Paper ID #36689Virtual adaptation of introductory materials engineering: apartially asynchronous approach to engage a large classJonathan Brown Jonathan Brown (B.S., M.S. Mathematics, New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology; Ph.D. Materials Engineering, New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology) is an Assistant Professor of Practice in the Department of Materials Science and Engineering at The Ohio State University. His background is in computer simulations and theory of polymer glasses and block copolymers for energy applications. He teaches introduction to materials science and engineering and
Western Illinois University. She earned her doctoral degree in Mass Communications from the Pennsylvania State University and her master’s degree in Public Relations from the University of Florida. Her research areas focus on social and psychological effects of new media technologies. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com 8QGHUVWDQGLQJWKH(IIHFWLYHQHVVRI 2QOLQH(QJLQHHULQJ(GXFDWLRQLQWKH7LPHRI&29,'$EVWUDFW7KLVUHVHDUFKSDSHUGHVFULEHVDVWXG\RIHQJLQHHULQJVWXGHQWV¶SHUFHSWLRQVRIRQOLQHFODVVHVLQWKHWLPHRI&29,',QWKHHQJLQHHULQJILHOGRQOLQHFODVVHVZHUHUHODWLYHO\XQFRPPRQSULRUWRWKHSDQGHPLF GXH WR WKH
Foundation. Kacey serves as Managing Editor of Engineering Studies, Deputy Editor of the Australasian Journal of Engineering Education, and is Past Chair of the SEFI Working Group on Gender and Diversity. She holds a Ph.D. in Science and Technology Studies from Virginia Tech, along with graduate certificates in Engineering Education and Women’s Studies. Her current research focuses on gender, interdisciplinarity, and mental wellness in engineering and engineering education. Further information about her work can be found at www.sociologyofengineering.org. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com A Systematic Literature
a Danish university had to negotiate their gender identityin ways men did not (e.g., examples of women ensuring they were dressed non-provocatively,“becom[ing] deaf to the male jokes and language”), in order to be taken seriously within themasculine culture of their engineering program. The interpersonal and communication skills,strengths among the women in the study, did not align with the “technology-relatedidentification” of engineering despite such competencies being essential to the practice ofengineering broadly. The women’s contribution on this front went unacknowledged by malecolleagues and faculty and remained largely invisible [3].These gendered identity negotiations were often carried into the workplace, where sexistinteractions
Paper ID #37100Event Related Potentials (ERP) Study to UnderstandFunction to Object Mapping for Engineering StudentMegan MarshallMd Tanvir Ahad Md Tanvir Ahad received his Bachelor’s degree from Ahsanullah University of Science and Technology on November 2013 in Electrical and Electronic Engineering. From January 2015July 2015 he was at the Dana Engineering International Ltd (GEWaukesha) in Dhaka, Bangladesh as an Assistant Engineer (GEWaukesha) gas engine. From 2015-2018 he was at the Applied DSP Laboratory of the Lamar University at Beaumont,TX, USA, and obtained a Master’s degree in Electrical Engineering on
environments for the teaching and learning of scale (co-PI), and an NSF IGE grant analyzing and improving graduate engineering and computer science courses (co-PI). He teaches courses on technological tools for teaching, the learning sciences, learning theories, equity and diversity, and methods for teaching. He wrote the supporting materials for a course on project-based learning that is being enacted in 44 universities in 21 states and the District of Columbia.Kevin Han (Assistant Professor) Assistant professor, Dept of Civil, Construction, and Environmental Engineering at NC State University. PI of NSF IGE and IUSE projects. Interested in creating and validating new ways to teach by developing tools and applying
the 10 professional skills elicited, ones that moreclosely relate to the engineering discipline (i.e., Engineering design, including use of relevantcodes/standards, Use of appropriate computer technology, Use of engineering tool) are less oftendeveloped even in technical work experiences. Students may mistakenly think that engineeringdesign is only what they had experienced in their first-year design or capstone course. However,engineering students may be unknowingly using elements of design thinking in theirengagements [31], [32]. For example, even in non-technical work experiences, students usecreative concept development to solve small problems that arise. Students may be thusundervaluing certain experiences in terms of what they develop
. Eng. Educ., vol. 95, no. 2, pp. 123–138, 2006.[2] M. Mosgaard and C. M. Spliid, “Evaluating the impact of a PBL-course for first-year engineering students learning through PBL-projects,” in 2011 2nd International Conference on Wireless Communication, Vehicular Technology, Information Theory and Aerospace Electronic Systems Technology (Wireless VITAE), Feb. 2011, pp. 1–6. doi: 10.1109/WIRELESSVITAE.2011.5940927.[3] K. M. Yusof, A. N. Sadikin, F. A. Phang, and A. A. Aziz, “Instilling professional skills and sustainable development through Problem-Based Learning (PBL) among first year engineering students,” Int. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 333–347, 2016.[4] C. S. Simmons, “Using CATME team-maker to form student groups in a
demographics Male-identifying student demographics Year Race & Major Year Race & Ethnicity Major Ethnicity Sophomore Asian, Indian Mechanical Engr First-year White First-year Engr Sophomore Asian, Mechanical Engr First-year Asian, Chinese First-year Engr Chinese Technology Junior Black Civil Engineering First-year White, Middle First-year Engr Eastern Senior White Biomedical Engr Sophomore Asian, Indian Mechanical Engr Senior
Paper ID #37494The Use of Lean Principles to Improve Teaching Efficiencyfor Engineering CoursesJohn A. Mirth (Associate Professor) John Mirth is a Professor of Mechanical Engineering at St. Cloud State University in St. Cloud, MN. Dr. Mirth received his Ph.D. and MSME degrees from the University of Minnesota, and his BSME degree from Ohio University. During his career he has taught at five different universities: University of Denver, University of Wisconsin-Platteville, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology, University of Iowa, and St. Cloud State University. Dr. Mirth's technical expertise lies in areas
Paper ID #37460Expansion of Biomedical Devices in an Engineering DesignProject to Promote Student WellnessIsabel MillerSara Rose Vohra Sara Vohra is an undergraduate studying Bioengineering with a minor in Chemistry at the University of Illinois at Urbana- Champaign. Her interests lie in education as well as medicine with a future career goal as a physician.Calvin CostnerKarin Jensen Karin Jensen, Ph.D. is a Teaching Associate Professor in bioengineering at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign. Her research interests include student mental health and wellness, engineering student career pathways, and
it? Now!. Medical Teacher, 33(2), e105-e112.[12] King, A. (2002). Structuring peer interaction to promote high-level cognitive processing. Theory into practice, 41(1), 33-39.[13] Webb, N. M. (1982). Student interaction and learning in small groups. Review of Educational research, 52(3), 421-445.[14] Bartholomew, S. R., & Strimel, G. J. (2018). Factors influencing student success on open- ended design problems. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 28(3), 753-770.[15] Springer, L., Stanne, M. E., & Donovan, S. S. (1999). Effects of small-group learning on undergraduates in science, mathematics, engineering, and technology: A meta- analysis. Review of educational research, 69(1), 21-51.
have existed in an existing technology or may not have the project existed on the existing design specifically because of the added function….So, yeah, in very simple terms, the boundaries and the constraints increased as you begin studying and noodling.” (P2) Problem- Identify “And I think that was key to success of this was we had a solving activities or check process, right? The designer designed, engineer did Methods and methodologies the engineering and the checker checked and then it got Strategies to support released and then it went and got built. And I didn't follow work
Paper ID #37266Student perceptions of oral exams in undergraduateengineering classes and implications for effective oral examdesignSaharnaz Baghdadchi Saharnaz Baghdadchi is an Assistant Teaching Professor at UC San Diego. She is interested in scholarly teaching and uses active learning techniques to help students achieve expert-like level of thinking. She guides students in bridging the gap between facts and usable knowledge to solve complex engineering problems.Huihui Qi (dupe) (Assistant Teaching Professor) Dr. Qi is an Assistant Teaching Professor at University of California, San Diego.Marko Lubarda (Assistant
professional development; educator integration of technology; supporting minoritized student in science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM); and student and peer mentorship. She is the Director of the University of Texas El Paso (UTEP) Yes, SHE Can Program, a Department of Education funded program designed to engage, motivate and support minoritized students, especially women in engineering. Her work continues in the realm of improved STEM education as she leads the Department of Education, STEMSHINE initiative. Diane Elisa is a 2022 recipient of the Academy of Distinguished Teachers Award for her outstanding contributions to teaching and learning at UTEP.Crystal Cholewa (Program Manager)Nora Cuvelier (Research Assistant
engineering students’ identity development, belonging, and agency in interdisciplinary engineering education. She leads the ASEE CDEI virtual workshop team focused on building a community of educators passionate about expanding their knowledge concerning diversity, equity, and inclusion in engineering education.Nicole Adia Jefferson (Student) Nicole Adia Jefferson is an Engineering Education Ph.D. student at Virginia Tech in Blacksburg, Va. She holds a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering & Technology and M.S. in Computer Science HCI, from Virginia State University, Petersburg, Va. Nicole is current member of The Research’s Impact on Society and Education (RISE) Research Group where she is a GRA for CAREER: Disrupting the
Engineering Identity,” Global Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 119-131, 2012.[3] American Association for Engineering Education, “Going the Distance in Engineering Education: Best Practices and Strategies for Retaining Engineering, Engineering Technology, and Computing Students,” 2012.[4] D. R. Johnson, M. Soldner, J. B. Leonard, P. Alvarez, K. Kurotsuchi Inkelas, H. T. Rowan-Kenyon and S. D. Longerbeam, “Examining Sense of Belonging Among First-Year Undergraduates from Different Racial/Ethnic Groups”, Journal of College Student Development, vol. 48, no. 5, pp. 525- 542, 2007.[5] “Expanding Underrepresented Minority Participation: Americas Science and Technology Talent at the Crossroads
S-STEM proposals,” Proceedings of the 122nd ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, June 14-17, 2015, Seattle, WA.2. L.M. Landgraf, T. Salmon-Stephens and I. Ul-Haq, “An ABC sampler of best practices, NSF STEM scholar program at UW-Plattville,” 2012 ASQ Advancing the STEM agenda in Education, the Workplace and Society, Session 3-3, July 16-17, 2012.3. Going the distance: Best practices and strategies for retaining engineering, engineering technology and computing students. ASEE.4. PCAST 2012. “Engage to Excel: Producing one million additional college graduates with degrees in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics,” President’s Council of Advisors on
between academia and industry to reduce female attrition from engineering. 2017 IEEE Women in Engineering (WIE) Forum USA East. doi:10.1109/WIE.2017.8285612[6] Accreditation Board of Engineering and Technology (ABET) engineering accreditation commission: Criteria for accrediting engineering programs. (2020). Retrieved from https://www.abet.org/wp- content/uploads/2020/03/E001-20-21-EAC-Criteria-Mark-Up-11-24-19-Updated.pdf[7] Burke, A., Okrent A., & Hale, K. (2022). The State of U.S. Science and Engineering 2022. National Science Foundation (NSF). National Center for Engineering and Science Statistics (NCESS). Alexandria, VA. Retrieved from https://ncses.nsf.gov/pubs/nsb20221[8] National Center for Science and Engineering
(NSF)Innovative Technology Experiences for Students and Teachers (ITEST) program in 2017 (furtherdescribed in Grohs et al. [10]). The partnership was initiated by researchers at Virginia Tech, alarge, R1, land-grant institution situated in Appalachia and involved middle school teachers andindustry partners working in three counties near the institution (two in Appalachia and onebordering Appalachia per the defined map from the Appalachian Regional Commission). Thepartnership focused on connecting teachers and working engineers in each county to integrateengineering into existing science curriculum as a way to expose students to engineering whilestill meeting the required state standards of learning. The project initially started working
Fritz Haber?” criticalnarrative elicited the most direct and comprehensive discussions about ethics. The compellingnarration asks listeners to place Haber’s accomplishment on a scale–ranking his ability to solveGermany’s food scarcity with his invention to pull nitrogen from the air along with his WWI warcrime of gassing enemies at the front line using similar technology. Because of its successfulstorytelling techniques, the Haber narrative elicited responses regarding weapons developmentand the ethics of engineering inventions and innovations. For instance, respondents claimed that “Fritz Haber…was a very good engineer – he found solutions to very difficult problems that were manufacturable and scalable. However, he did not have
undergraduate research and classroomdemonstrations. 3D printing has already revolutionized the teaching of mechanical engineering,but applications in civil engineering have been somewhat limited to date. To leverage thisemerging technology and provide a problem-based learning experience to students, asemester-long 3D-printing Dynamics Design (3D3 ) Competition was developed in conjunctionwith the undergraduate dynamics course. A select group of competition participants (or “3D3Scholars”), who are concurrently enrolled in the junior-level course, completed four 3–4 weeklong challenges that are synchronous with concepts covered in the class, including rigid bodykinematics and structural dynamics. By the end of the semester, each student will have
, and community programs designed to develop children’sinterest in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (or STEM) related activities.Many such programs are designed to increase participation by individuals often consideredunderrepresented in STEM (e.g., girls and students of color), and thus, pipelines are created toand through college for STEM related disciplines. This has particularly been the case forengineering with making-related programs that allow pre-college age students to applyengineering concepts through design and making in makerspaces. As a result, many engineeringstudents arrive at college with a wide range of pre-college experiences; this preparation has ledus to ask: Which experiences influence pre-college age
Paper ID #37868Predicting learning outcome in a first-year engineeringcourse: a human-centered learning analytics approachLaura Melissa Cruz Castro Laura M. Cruz Castro is a Ph.D. candidate in the Department of Engineering Education under the guidance of Dr. Kerrie Douglas. She holds a B.S. in Statistics from Universidad Nacional de Colombia, a M.S. in Business Intelligence from Universität de Barcelona, and a M.S in Electrical and Computer Engineering from Purdue University. Her research interests include educational data analytics, ethical considerations regarding the use of data in education, incorporation of
, andPell eligibility in the School of Engineering and an S-STEM program. In all cases, the S-STEMprogram retained more students than the SoE as a whole. S-STEM students have to meet a GPArequirement to be eligible for the program. Because of this, the subset of SoE students that areeligible for S-STEM are academically talented and more likely to be retained. Nevertheless, thepositive retention findings for S-STEM encourage us to seek ways to provide similar support(mentoring, etc.) to a larger number of students.AcknowledgementsThe authors gratefully acknowledge the support of the National Science Foundation under grantDUE-1742112.References1. “NSF Scholarships in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (S-STEM),” NSF. [Online
Paper ID #36449Implementation of Graphical Visualization Techniques andRobotics Labs in ‘Introduction to Engineering’ CourseAkbar M. Eslami (Professor)Chandra Bhushan Asthana (Associate Professor)Kuldeep S Rawat (M.D. Thorpe Endowed Professor & Dean) © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.comImplementation of Graphical Visualization Techniques and Robotics Labs in ‘Introduction to Engineering’ CourseAbstractThis paper discusses the development and implementation of two new topics, graphicalvisualization and robotics, in ‘introduction to engineering’ course. Sample of
profession Influence of culture on the engineering design International trade process Appropriate technology International ethics Likely experiences in other cultures International relationsWednesday class periods are devoted to helping students learn about the culture that they will beworking in. If the country that they will be traveling to uses a language other than English, thesedays may focus on teaching basic conversational language skills. The language lessons arehighly interactive in that they rely on students speaking to each other rather than focusing onreading competence. These periods also include presentations, sometimes by guest speakers,about the history, people, food, customs, religion
, or evaluating.I. IntroductionIn this era of fast changing technologies and interdisciplinary work culture, engineers need tobe well equipped with a wide variety of skills that will enable them to be creative, effectivecommunicators, proficient at performing analytical tasks, and lifelong learners. Along theselines, ABET defined student outcome 7 as “an ability to acquire and apply new knowledge asneeded, using appropriate learning strategies” [1]. Self-reflection is one such appropriatelearning strategy wherein individuals assess their own knowledge, skills, and learningprocesses. Self-reflection provides opportunities to recognize areas for improvement in one’sown learning, to consider ways to pursue improvement, and to monitor one’s
Paper ID #36491Experiential Learning as a Tool for Deep CollaborationBetween Business and Engineering MajorsPhilip Appiah-kubi Dr. Appiah-Kubi is an Associate Professor at the University of Dayton (Department of Engineering Management, Systems, and Technology). He has a Ph.D. in Industrial and Systems Engineering and a master's degree in Aviation Systems and Flight Testing from Ohio University and The University of Tennessee, respectively. He also has a graduate certificate in Engineering Management. His research interests lie in engineering pedagogy, data analytics, and supply chain management.Melissa
settings on how well engineering students learn content, develop group-work skills and perceive their learning environment. He has written more than 150 refereed technical papers, and his opinion editorials have appeared in the Tampa Bay Times, the Tampa Tribune, and the Chronicle Vitae.Ali Yalcin (Assistant Professor) Ali Yalcin, is an Associate Professor of Industrial and Management Systems in the College of Engineering at the University of South Florida. He is the co-founder of Collaborative for Research & Education in Aging and Technology. Previously he was part of the leadership team who founded the Patel College of Global Sustainability at USF. His research interests include Data Analytics, Ambient Intelligence