Conference Session

DEED Technical Session 5 Design Teams

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Shulong Yan; Eunice Kang; Andrew Katz, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Avneet Hira, Boston College

engineering epistemology. Her work is inspired by Making and tinkering practices, especially those from different local knowledge systems. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com Augmented Reality for Sustainable Collaborative DesignMs. Eunice KangEunice Kang is an undergraduate student at Boston College studying international studies with aconcentration in ethics and social justice as well as a minor in computer science. She is aresearch assistant in Dr. Avneet Hira’s HER lab.Dr. Shulong YanShulong Yan is a Postdoctoral Research Fellow in the Human-Centered Engineering program atBoston College. Her research focuses on

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Chris Ferekides, University of South Florida; Carol Haden, Northern Arizona University; Gokhan MuMcu, University of South Florida; Ismail Uysal, University of South Florida; Joel Howell; Chung Seop Jeong, University of South Florida; Wilfrido Moreno, University of South Florida; Arash Takshi; Kevin Yee; Paul Spector, University of South Florida

: foundation in: engineering ethical codes and identifying academic and processes of engineering creeds research career opportunities design, innovation, invention, and assessing the benefits of and entrepreneurship pursuing graduate degrees exploring ideas of identifying current methods to determine engineering career engineering research customer needs and obtaining opportunities and factors that activities at USF and best continuous feedback will influence individual practices preferences formulating short and long- enhancing technical skills by using stakeholder

Conference Session

ERM: Student Professional Development: Professional Skills and Moving Beyond the Classroom

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Tiantian Li, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE); Eric Holloway, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE); Kerrie Douglas, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE); Julie Martin, The Ohio State University; Victoria Bill, New York University Tandon School of Engineering

Engineering Education [1]–[3]. Theseorganizations advocate for engineering programs to incorporate the development of skills such asteamwork, leadership, business management, and engineering ethics into the engineeringcurricula [1]–[3]. In addition, research has shown that opportunities for students to practiceprofessional skills significantly contribute to them being prepared for actual professional practiceupon graduation [4], [5].While engineering programs have worked to incorporate non-technical professional skills intothe already-packed curriculum, the development of these skills has also been shown to occur inother settings. Co-curricular activities such as professional societies, student organizations, andresearch opportunities offer students

Conference Session

Engineering and Public Policy Division Technical Session

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Sandra Allain, Pennsylvania State University

, engineers, andtechnologists the skills to be versed in technology ethics, regulatory policy, and emergingtechnology trends for business growth and societal impact.Development of the MELP program initiated with the formation of an interdisciplinary academiccommittee tasked with designing the MELP program. The interdisciplinary team was comprisedof twelve faculty members across the College of Engineering, the School of InternationalAffairs, Penn State Law and the LPE director. The team worked on MELP’s curricular structurebetween January and March 2020, including adopting a systems thinking approach as theframework for students to understand law and policy as systems within systems.The context of engineering is one dominated by systems and the

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Prateek Shekhar, New Jersey Institute of Technology; Aileen Huang-Saad, Northeastern University; Aida Lopez Ruiz, New Jersey Institute of Technology; Jacqueline Handley, University of Michigan

of EEP non-participants also shared criticism ofentrepreneurship and EEPs, moving beyond disinterest into specific concerns aboutentrepreneurial spaces. These women STEM academics described critiques or concerns about thepractices of entrepreneurship conflicting with their personal ethics and/or stances that academiashould not be about making money. For example, Dr. Madani shared: “I just want to be on the record as saying I am flat-out straight against entrepreneurship because as a scientist, I don’t want our students to grow up thinking, “I’m making this to sell it.” I am 100% supportive of entrepreneurship mindset” (Madani Interview, 04/29/2021)Dr. Madani’s exemplar animates the challenges some women STEM faculty

Conference Session

NEE Technical Session - the Best of NEE

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Shannon Parks, University of Pittsburgh at Johnstown; Tumkor Serdar, University of Pittsburgh at Johnstown; Laura Wieserman, University of Pittsburgh; Kurt Klavuhn, University of Pittsburgh at Johnstown; Amy Miller, University of Pittsburgh at Johnstown

toCOVID-19. As the fall semester continues, faculty continue to research, share ideas, and try newways to ensure academic integrity. Some have opted for take-home or open-book, open-notesexams, while others take advantage of the variety of software that monitors student activitiesduring exams. In the end, academic integrity comes down to trust and ethics. Students must bedriven to build this strong sense of ethics that will be with them throughout their engineeringcareers. Students (and everyone) should strive to do what is right and fair even when no one islooking.Time should be taken upfront in an online learning environment to teach students how to succeedin this environment. Learning tips such as active participation in synchronous classes

Conference Session

Educational Research and Methods (ERM) Division Poster Session

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Daniel Castaneda, James Madison University; Joi Merritt, James Madison University; Joel Mejia, The University of Texas at San Antonio

skills,communication skills, and problem-solving efforts in domain-specific contexts [7] [13] [14] [15][16]; or influence learners’ self-regulation phases [17] [18] or ethics [19]. Yet, no studies haveexplored how ill-structured problems, specifically used in engineering classroom contexts,promote learners’ understanding of their own social realities. Our study seeks to redress this gapin the literature by exploring how the ill-structured characteristic of an engineering mechanics-based PBL unit fostered learner’s understanding of the world around them.We use Freire’s critical consciousness (CC) to understand how a learner comes to understand theworld, its injustices, and their individual responsibility to resolve those injustices [20]. There

Conference Session

ERM: Let's Continue the Conversation about Tests! Part 2

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Logan Perry, University of Nebraska - Lincoln; Jeremi London, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Steven Ayer; Wei Wu, California State University, Fresno; Kieren McCord, Arizona State University

].Other competencies include ethics, professional judgement, and an understanding of practicalityand constructability, all of which have a critical impact on real-world engineering design. Mostimportantly, students must understand how these competencies fit into the complex nature ofdesign and the difficult choices that often must be made to satisfy design criteria and developsolutions in realistic conditions. Thus, to best prepare graduates for work, engineering educationprograms must incorporate authentic design experiences into their curricula, providing studentswith opportunities to think through real-world scenarios using a holistic set of competencies thatgo beyond technical knowledge alone.The purpose of this study was to understand how

Conference Session

ETD Technical Session 8 - ET Pedagogy II

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

James Kribs, North Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University

students to reflect on their level of proficiency in their understanding and, when deficient,work to further their development. As part of the code of ethics of many of the professionalorganizations for engineers and technologists, such as the National Society of ProfessionalEngineers, there is a requirement for members to only undertake activities in their areas ofexpertise and to not misrepresent their knowledge and skills to any clients.[1] While grades areconsidered to be a way for students to reflect on their skill level and see where any deficienciescould exist, but it has been shown that engineering students routinely over estimate their grades,even after multiple assessment scores.[2] Due to exposure effects, such as the Dunning

Conference Session

Understanding Inclusivity and Equity in STEM Contexts: Equity, Culture & Social Justice in Education Division Technical Session 7

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Tyrine Jamella Pangan, Tufts University; Chelsea Andrews, Tufts University

ethics seminars (Hess &Fore, 2018). To better integrate these concepts, some researchers suggest starting at a smallerscale within existing engineering courses, such as engaging students in sociotechnical thinkingthrough class assignments or rubrics (Claussen et al., 2019; Salzman et al., 2019).Although academic institutions are now working to integrate the social, economic, and politicaldimensions of engineering in undergraduate engineering coursework, there remains a lack offundamental research on how to engage students in these sociotechnical topics. This isparticularly true within the scope of traditionally technical courses, such as the engineeringsciences, where students are only expected to demonstrate technical competencies by the

Conference Session

Multidisciplinary Engineering Division Technical Session - Interdisciplinary Capstone Projects, Pandemic Adapted Mechatronics Lab, Call for Change

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Adeel Khalid, Kennesaw State University

Critical Design Review (CDR) – Design for environment, sustainability, safety, reports and fabrication drawings Week 13-15 Final Design Review (FDR) – Final design and models presented and delivered to the industry 11. Course Learning OutcomesThe capstone senior inter-disciplinary course is offered as a two-course sequence culminating theundergraduate engineering education. Under the guidance of a faculty mentor and an industrypartner mentor, students form small interdisciplinary teams to apply engineering design principlesand methods for solving and industry-relevant engineering design problem. The first course in thesequence also covers topics including the engineering ethics, the Fundamentals of Engineeringexam, and

Conference Session

DEED Technical Session 6 Design Pedagogy

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Joan Tisdale, University of Colorado Boulder; Angela Bielefeldt, University of Colorado Boulder; Katherine Ramos, University of Colorado Boulder; Rebecca Komarek, University of Colorado Boulder

CEAE Department (2008-2018). Bielefeldt is active in the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), serving on the Civil Engineering Program Criteria Task Committee (2019-2022) and the Body of Knowledge 3 Task Committee (2016-2018). She is the Senior Editor for the International Journal for Service Learning in Engineering (IJSLE) and a Deputy Editor for the ASCE Journal of Civil Engineering Education. Her research focuses on engineering education, including ethics, social responsibility, sustainable engineering, and community engagement. Bielefeldt is also a Fellow of the American Society for Engineering Education.Katherine Ramos (Teaching Assistant Professor)Rebecca Komarek (Graduate Student) Rebecca Komarek is the

Conference Session

DEED Technical Session 9 - Design Across the Curriculum

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Christopher Rennick, University of Waterloo; Michael Lenover, University of Waterloo; Eugene Li, University of Waterloo; Sanjeev Bedi, University of Waterloo

Organize and critically interpret generated and received information Professionalism Articulate the roles and responsibilities of the professional engineer in society Describe the importance of codes, standards, best practices, laws and regulations in engineering Impact on Society Identify the relevance of and uncertainty associated with different aspects of an engineering project Analyze the social, health, safety and environmental aspects of an engineering project Ethics and equity Identify ethical and unethical behavior in professional situations Identify how an

Conference Session

Student Division Technical 3: Mixed - Research, Engineering Design, Design Thinking, and Curriculum Design

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Gracie Judge, University of Michigan; Susan Lord, University of San Diego; Cynthia Finelli, University of Michigan

, and society’senergy problems [11], [12]. Polmear et al. proposed an in-class intervention they call a “micro-insertion” of ethics and societal impacts [13]. In this study, students explored a hydraulicfracturing micro-insertion in three different courses. They found that facilitating self-guidedand/or collaborative learning, exploring engineering in the societal context, and creating acomfortable environment were important to students. Polmear et al. make a strong argument thatincluding technical content in preexisting technical courses makes efficient use of availablecredit hours, while engaging students with engineering ethics [13]. Electric circuits is typically the first course electrical engineering (EE) students take intheir

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Hannah Huvard, New Mexico State University; Hengameh Bayat, New Mexico State University; Sandra M. Way, New Mexico State University; Catherine Brewer, New Mexico State University; Addison Miller; Antonio Garcia, New Mexico State University

skills [8], [9]. Beyond practical skills gained, co-curricular programs have the potential to improveengineering education by enhancing students’ leadership, ethical training, professional skills, anda variety of social-psychological traits [9]–[13]. Finelli et al. [11] explain how the engineeringprofession requires engineers to understand and incorporate many ethical standards into theirwork, but most engineering curricula do not formally teach ethics. Co-curricular activities havethe capacity to allow for students to learn and understand ethical issues outside of the classroom[11]. Athreya and Kalkhoff [10] describe a program that helps students grow as engineers bylearning about leadership. Even though the program is not directly

Conference Session

Technological and Engineering Literacy - Philosophy of Engineering Division Technical Session 3

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Alan Cheville, Bucknell University; John Heywood, Trinity College Dublin

in common models of learning.A Critique of Outcomes-Based EducationThe above offers several possible critiques of outcomes-based education. In the spirit ofHabermas’ discourse ethics, the point is not to assert outcomes are bad per se, but rather torecognize that the limitations of a system that has become extremely prevalent in education areoften ignored. For example, when ABET adopted outcomes-based evaluation with EC-2000 thefocus become on continual quality improvement. This framework was well understood byengineers and thus readily accessible to engineering educators. In this case the quality that isbeing improved in the ABET process are the defined student learning outcomes that eachprogram is responsible for assessing and evaluating

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kang Xia; Mohammad Yunus Naseri, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Gautam Biswas, Vanderbilt University; Manoj Jha, North Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University (CoE); Erin Henrick, Vanderbilt University; Emily Kern; Caitlin Snyder; Landon Marston, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Abhishek Dubey; Christopher Vanags; Niroj Aryal; Steven Jiang, North Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University (CoE); Erin Hotchkiss; Vinod Lohani, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Brendan McLoughlin, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Sambridhi Bhandari

different STEM disciplines, course pedagogies, academic levels, and needsindependent of each other. However, using only an emergent approach to coding would haveobscured the topical inadequacies of our modules. Therefore, we conducted a literature reviewon the most common categorization of data science concepts and techniques. Despite theevolving nature of data science as an academic discipline, we found general trends of datascience concepts and techniques common across disciplines. These general trends werecategorized into six broad categories: (1) data acquisition, (2) data quality issues, (3) data useand visualization, (4) machine learning, (5) data ethics, privacy, and security, and (6)miscellaneous. Table 2 summarizes the coding scheme and

Conference Session

Computers in Education 1 - Programming I

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

AHMET ARIS, Florida International University; Luis Puche Rondon, Florida International University; Daniel Ortiz, Florida International University; Monique Ross, Florida International University; Mark Finlayson, Florida International University; A. Uluagac, Florida International University

et al. [20], the recent non-traditional approaches of gamification [21], behavioralaspects [22], multidisciplinary techniques [23], and ethical aspects [24].AI Education. AI is a challenging topic for beginners to learn due to complex fundamentaltheories (e.g., machine learning, game theory) [25]. In order to motivate learners and help themlearn, researchers proposed several methods to teach AI to students including the cumulative wayto teach AI components [26], the use of games [25, 27–29], emotional intelligence [30], andconsideration of ethical aspects [31, 32]Cybersecurity and AI Education. In terms of the studies that consider both cybersecurity andAI education, there exists only one study in the literature. Farahmand [33] shared the

Conference Session

Civil Engineering Division ASCE Liaison Committee - Accreditation and Curriculums - What Changes Are Occurring?

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Sami Alshurafa; Laura Wieserman, University of Pittsburgh; Hanan Alhayek; Khaled Hussein

solidunderstanding of professional and ethical responsibilities.Civil Engineering Program Learning OutcomesThe program learning outcomes set to help graduates of the civil engineering program to gaincompetence, and to apply the knowledge of mathematics, science, and engineering. The plan wasdesigned to enable students to gain the skills to design and conduct experimental testing,simulate, analyze, and interpret data and can design a system to meet the set needs withinrealistic boundaries such as environmental, social, economic, political, ethical, health and safety,and sustainability. Students are expected to have the capacity to work effectively onmultidisciplinary teams, to develop the skills to classify, articulate, and solve engineeringdiscrete problems

Conference Session

ETD - A Technology Potpourri I

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Marilyn Barger; Ron Eaglin, Daytona State College; Sam Ajlani

requirements of the program. Most A.S. degree seeking students have not had an examination experience that was not directlyconnected to success in a single course they are currently taking. They are not aware that therewill be an exam after most of their engineering courses are completed but before they graduatenor that this exam is discipline specific for any of the following areas: Chemical, Civil,Electrical and Computer, Environmental, Industrial and Systems, Mechanical, and OtherDisciplines. The “Other Disciplines” exam is the target for students with the A.S. EngineeringTechnology degree. This exam covers mathematics through differential equations, statistics,chemistry, instrumentation and controls, engineering ethics, safety, engineering

Conference Session

LEAD Tech Session #2: Assessing and Evaluating Engineering Leadership Development.

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Elizabeth Volpe; Madeline Polmear, University of Florida; Denise Simmons, University of Florida; Danielle Weisenfeld, University of Florida; Jackson Carcaba, University of Florida

faculty development. Elizabeth received a B.S. in civil engineering from Clemson University (Clemson, SC).Madeline Polmear (Dr.) Madeline Polmear is a Marie Sklodowska-Curie, EUTOPIA Science & Innovation Cofund Fellow in the Law, Science, Technology & Society research group at the Vrije Universiteit Brussel in Belgium. Her primary research interests relate to engineering ethics education and the development of societal responsibility and professional competence inside and outside the classroom. She also works in the areas of informal learning and diversity, equity, and inclusion. She has a Ph.D. in civil engineering, M.S. in civil engineering, and B.S. in environmental engineering from the University of

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Xumin Liu; Erik Golen; Rajendra Raj, Rochester Institute of Technology (GCCIS)

modeling, and data analytics models. We adopt the format of a curricularmodule, as it has been common in computing pedagogy as self-contained units of instructions tobe incorporated in a specific course 4,5 . The curricular module has two settings, Level I and LevelII, targeting the first and second CSP courses for non-computing majors, such as the CSPrinciples and DS Principles courses for non-majors. Both of these two levels incorporate theusage of the DSLP into the teaching and learning, assisting students to obtain hands on practice ofhandling, understanding, and analyzing real world data sets, as well as an awareness ofdata-related ethics and privacy.The first targeted course is equivalent to AP CSP and is offered to first year college

Conference Session

Bringing Engineering Leadership Pedagogy to Life!

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Emily Moore, University of Toronto; Cindy Rottmann, University of Toronto; Patricia Sheridan, University of Toronto; Samina Hashmi, University of Toronto

Associate Director, Research at the Troost Institute for Leadership Education in Engineering at the University of Toronto. She conducts research on engineering leadership, engineers' professional practice, and ethics and equity in engineering. She is currently the Program Chair of the ASEE LEAD division.Patricia Kristine Sheridan (Assistant Professor, Teaching Stream)Samina Hashmi Instructor © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com Work in Progress: Exploring Engineering Leadership Orientations in the ClassroomOver the past twenty years, many engineering programs have introduced leadership

Conference Session

Aerospace Division Technical Session: Sustainability and the Workspace

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Yun Dong, Iowa State University of Science and Technology; Subhanwit Roy, Iowa State University of Science and Technology; MacKenzie Reber, Grove City College

actionsfrom newcomers. Similarities and differences can be identified by comparing the codeschemes from the results. The followings are the criteria for determining the similarities anddifferences:1) Similarity exists when a supportive action directly supports a proactive action. Or,it does not directly support a proactive action, however, has the same goals and takesthe same or similar approaches as the proactive action. For instance, in Social Integration,newly-hired engineers maintain a good work ethic to show they are reliable to coworkers. Inthis way, they acquire respect and develop a good social relationships with their coworkersthrough the working process. Managers, in Social Integration, would allow newcomers tonaturally develop the

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Cheryl Bodnar, Rowan University; Jeffrey Stransky, Rowan University; Cayla Ritz, Rowan University; Emily Dringenberg, The Ohio State University; Elif Miskioglu, Bucknell University

Paper ID #38226MIND THE GAP! …between engineers’ process safety beliefsand behaviorsJeffrey Stransky Jeffrey Stransky is a PhD candidate in the Experiential Engineering Education (ExEEd) Department at Rowan University. His research interests involve studying engineering ethics and decision making and using digital games as safe teaching environments. He has published in the overlap of these topics by integrating digital games into chemical engineering curriculum to help students build an awareness of the ethical and practical implications of their decisions. Jeffrey obtained his BS and MSc in Mechanical

Conference Session

CIT Division Technical Session #3

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Teresa Ober, University of Notre Dame; Emmanuel Johnson, University of Southern California; Philip Gonsalves; Mayank Kakodkar, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE); Janice Zdankus

consider the ethical and long-termconsequences of this particular application of AI in education 13 14 to ensure that it is achieving itsaim of supporting underserved and underrepresented students in STEM+C. 28 For example, weshould strive to ensure that AI-enabled platforms such as CPI minimize the negative impact ofalgorithmic bias, whether it is apparent or not 29 . Inviting input from educators and students fromdiverse backgrounds in the development of such systems may help to prevent the negative impactof algorithmic bias. 30 Further work in each of these areas has the potential to greatly improve theimpact CPI platform on student users’ knowledge of STEM+C as well as their future academicand career interests development at scale. These aims

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kirsten Dodson, Lipscomb University; Courtney Deckard, Lipscomb University; Hannah Duke, Lipscomb University; Elizabeth Buchanan; Justice White, Lipscomb University

investigated further. The demographics of the alumni respondents matched the expectations of the researchteam based on the demographics of Lipscomb [17] and the engineering field [18]. Additionally,because white males represent the majority of engineering jobs, data from this group will behighly useful to understanding inclusion perspectives in the workplace. Of note, however, is theimpact that underrepresented groups may have on inclusivity in engineering. McGee and Bentleydescribe how black and Latinx undergraduate STEM students develop an equity ethic or aconcern for social justice based on past suffering from inequities [19]. It’s possible thatunderrepresented groups in engineering feel a desire for inclusivity because of an equity ethic

Conference Session

EMD Technical Session 2: Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Cindy Rottmann, University of Toronto; Emily Moore, University of Toronto; Andrea Chan; Lee Weissling; Dimpho Radebe, University of Toronto

Paper ID #38132“What’s getting in the way?” Personal and ProfessionalBarriers to Engineering LeadershipCindy Rottmann (Associate Director Research) Cindy Rottmann is the Associate Director, Research at the Troost Institute for Leadership Education in Engineering at the University of Toronto. She conducts research on engineering leadership, engineers' professional practice, and ethics and equity in engineering. She is currently the Program Chair of the ASEE LEAD division.Emily Moore Dr. Emily Moore is the Director of the Troost Institute for Leadership Education in Engineering at the University of Toronto

Conference Session

Civil Engineering Division - Huh? What Did You Say? What Does That Mean?

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Angela Bielefeldt, University of Colorado Boulder; Cristina Torres-Machi; Qin Lv, University of Colorado Boulder

roles including Faculty Director of the Sustainable By Design Residential Academic Program (2014-2017), Director of the Environmental Engineering program (2006-2010), and ABET Assessment Coordinator for the CEAE Department (2008-2018). Bielefeldt is active in the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), serving on the Civil Engineering Program Criteria Task Committee (2019-2022) and the Body of Knowledge 3 Task Committee (2016-2018). She is the Senior Editor for the International Journal for Service Learning in Engineering (IJSLE) and a Deputy Editor for the ASCE Journal of Civil Engineering Education. Her research focuses on engineering education, including ethics, social responsibility, sustainable engineering, and

Conference Session

Construction Engineering Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mohamed Elzomor, Florida International University; Rubaya Rahat, Florida International University; Piyush Pradhananga; Claudia Calle Müller, Florida International University

- assignments and term, 5-semester or 8- assessments) quarter weeks) 1. Why sustainability? 1. Why sustainability? 2. What is sustainability? Freshman – Sophomore 2. What is sustainability? 3. How to measure it 3. How to measure it? 4. Role of the engineer, 4. What is the triple-bottom line? ethics, and