scholars because of conflictingacademic structures. As a result, we pose the following research questions: 1. How do individual, microsystem, and mesosystem-level influences in a students’ academic environment affect graduate students’ abilities to develop a strong sense of interdisciplinary scholar identity, critical to self-efficacy and professional development, as they become professors in interdisciplinary spaces? 2. What are graduate students’ perceptions of the interrelationship between various layers of their academic environment (i.e., academic backgrounds and previous learning, microsystems, and mesosystems) and their interdisciplinary scholar professional identity development?Theoretical
visibility spectrum, Black engineers have alsodescribed feelings of hypervisibility in which they are the center of attention, flagged orhighlighted in ways that make them stand out from the majority group. McGee et al. [15] presentan example where Black students' achievements are questioned despite being earned from theirown merits. Black engineers in leadership positions face additional trials in these scenarios ofvisibility, such as garnering respect, representing their entire race, and extra labor withoutconsideration or compensation for their roles and duties [16], [17]. Language is often used as a tool for shaping identity in STEM fields [18]. For Blackpeople, the use of language is also used as an identity-shaping device that connects
: 10.1080/13613324.2021.1924137.[15] B. A. Burt, “Toward a Theory of Engineering Professorial Intentions: The Role of Research Group Experiences,” American Educational Research Journal, vol. 56, no. 2, pp. 289–332, Apr. 2019, doi: 10.3102/0002831218791467.[16] J. Seniuk Cicek, P. Sheridan, L. Kuley, and R. Paul, “Through ‘Collaborative Autoethnography’: Researchers Explore Their Role as Participants in Characterizing the Identities of Engineering Education Graduate Students in Canada,” in 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, Columbus, Ohio, Jun. 2017, p. 29029. doi: 10.18260/1-2--29029.[17] J. B. Main, L. Tan, M. F. Cox, E. O. McGee, and A. Katz, “The correlation between undergraduate student
disciplines [31], [32], there is anundeniable link between a students’ personal identities, institutional culture, the global politicalclimate, and their lived experience in graduate school [33]–[35]. For decades it has been knownthat there is a graduate student attrition problem [36], with 24-35% of domestic engineering PhDstudents prematurely leaving degree programs [37] and an even higher rate at 43% forunderrepresented groups like African American doctoral engineering students [38]. At the timeof writing this even, I consider the goodbye-party I will attend this evening for a studentprematurely leaving my partner’s research group.Beyond the degree completion stage, attrition in academia and STEM remains an issue, withonly 48.5% of all US PhD
apply formedical and law school entrance exams due to their unsteady citizenship status, and otherstudents noted the changing nature of immigration policymaking that threatened undocumentedstudents with temporariness. In another study, a participant, Alysa, said “‘I heard about thewhole graduate school and Ph.Ds. and all that, and I’m like yeah, I want to be a doctor. But thenI’m like ‘wait, what if DACA gets taken away?’” [46] (p. 327). Her question, along with others,highlighted the effects of political threats on a displaced students’ liminal legality andprofessional identity; they reified one’s in-between status, espouse its temporariness, and madelooking for work seem futile [21]. These students’ experiences also showed that, liminal
Paper ID #37488Student curiosity in engineering courses and research experiences: ”I’mkind of torn between being a decent student and a decent engineer.”Dr. Natalie Evans, University of Virginia Natalie Evans, Ph.D. is a postdoctoral research associate in the UVA school of Education and Human Development. Her research examines how educational experiences influence the development of curiosity and creativity in students from preschool through college.Jessica Scoville, University of VirginiaJamie J. Jirout, University of VirginiaDr. Caitlin Donahue Wylie, University of Virginia Caitlin D. Wylie is an associate professor of Science
Paper ID #37733Board 191: Are female faculty role models to female students in highereducation? A study of teachers’ perceptions of their roles andresponsibilities in computer science and engineeringDr. Qian Wang, Xi’an Jiaotong-Liverpool University (XJTLU) Dr. Qian ”Sarah” Wang is a Research Director, Ph.D. supervisor, and former Program Director of the MA in Global Education at the Academy of Future Education, XJTLU. Dr. Sarah graduated from Teachers College, Columbia University in New York (MA in Social-organizational Psychology; Ed.D in Education Leadership). Her research focuses on technology-enhanced education
the mentoring relationship hasbeen understudied. Thirdly, the intersectionality of graduate students' identities, including race,ethnicity, gender, and sexual orientation, and how it may affect mentoring relationships andretention rates, has not been thoroughly explored. Fourthly, there is a lack of clarity on the mosteffective formats and structures of mentoring for various graduate student groups. Finally, whilemost of the existing work on STEM mentoring has been conducted in academic settings, therole of mentoring in professional contexts, where graduate students may face uniquechallenges, requires further investigation. Addressing these gaps in the literature will contributeto a more comprehensive understanding of the role of mentoring in
university. Departments can also ensure the financial stability of their students by hav-ing policies and procedures in place for continued student funding. Stress fromnot knowing if they will be funded in the next semester or over the summer canbe detrimental to many graduate students. With some form of ensured fundingmechanism, student financial-stress could be greatly reduced. Departments can also assist in ensuring graduate students have a positivework culture and promote work-life balance. Department culture is a criticalcomponent of graduate students feeling welcome and encouraged. Having eventsthat support graduate students, assistance programs for students, and encour-gaing positive interactions between graduate students, faculty, and
how collaborative learning impacts the development oftheir egonet. We want to build egonets for the students to determine if there is a relationshipbetween the structure of a student’s egonets and the student’s characterization of the amount ofteamwork required in their major classes. The network characteristics of interest are socialcapital and clustering coefficient.Social capital is a measure of worth that comes from human interactions, and is typically foundin the ties that are made between individuals in a social network. The social capital that existswithin the social network of an individual can play a major role in their success in school, workor in their personal life [17]. Using an egonet, the quality and quantity of an
the role of academic researchers, including graduate students in technologycommercialization and entrepreneurship (Astebro et al. 2012; Hayter et al. 2017; Shah andPahnke 2014).Launched in 2011, the nationwide or "Teams" program originated from the Lean LaunchPadapproach to entrepreneurship education and startups developed at Stanford University (Nnakweet al., 2018). The I-Corps curriculum centers around a market research and validation processknown as “customer discovery”, which requires participants to interview 100 potential customersand stakeholders (Nnakwe et al., 2018) to assess the product-market fit of their technologies(National Science Foundation, 2019; VentureWell, 2019). Participants apply to the program inteams of three
Engineering Education at Virginia Tech, where she directs the Virginia Tech Engineering Communications Center (VTECC). Her research focuses on communication, collabo- ration, and identity in engineering.Margaret Webb, Virginia Tech Margaret (Maggie) Webb is a master’s and Ph.D. student in sustainable land development (civil engi- neering) and engineering education, respectively, at Virginia Tech. She graduated with her mechanical engineering degree from Rice University and worked for ExxonMobil as a subsea engineer and as a high school STEM teacher in a Houston charter school before starting grad school. Her research interests in- clude supporting the needs of displaced engineering students, understanding the supports and
cope withstress should focus primarily on improving their emotional relationship with their position [7],[15], [34]. In this study, students who developed a healthy work-life balance and found time todetach completely from academic responsibilities both had lower levels of stress and a greaterself-reported ability to manage their stress. However, as previous studies have found, it is likelythat a student’s identity as an engineering graduate student, and the environment they live andwork in, might stand between them and more effective coping strategies [6], [15], [34], [40].The engineering student “boot camp mentality”—the belief that an experience of sharedsuffering and hardship can bring people closer together—can make some students feel as
discussions withcurrent engineering leaders, researchers, and graduate students was a crucial tool for consideringtheir career paths. Specifically, students from underrepresented groups related the knowledgeobtained from interpersonal relations with engineers from underrepresented groups with astronger self-efficacy in their academic formation and a stronger desire to become role modelsfor other minorities. Hence, activities outside the classroom, such as this REU, are an essentialtool for developing skills that employers are looking for, in addition to providing a betterunderstanding of the career paths in engineering. These experiences influence how studentsperceive their future impact on society as engineers and encourage undergraduates to persist
appropriate expectations for graduate students, navigatingdifferences in perspectives and goals, managing self-doubt, and addressing problems outside thetraditional role(s) of a graduate advisor. The student-advisor relationship allows both the advisorand the student to act as catalysts for growth in terms of both professional and personaldevelopment.The work presented within this paper is only the preliminary results of a larger body of researchseeking to identify and characterize mutually beneficial graduate advising practices. Future workwill include the analysis of transcripts from all four of the workshop sessions (EffectiveStrategies for Mentoring Graduate Students, Effective Strategies for Identifying the RightGraduate Students, Effective
Facility at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln (UNL). Dr. Rutt received her doctorate in Educational Studies from the UNL in 2020. Her personal research interests and experiences include examining international students of Color’s first-year experiences at Predominantly White Institutions (PWIs), ethnic identity development in heritage scholars (study abroad), working on eliminating minority health disparities, and studies on identity (including cultural identity, conflict identity, and nationalism). ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 “I haven't really made those connections that maybe most would their first year”: A qualitative study of the COVID-19 pandemic and student social
(WIED) at ASEE convened a panel of current graduate students andpostdoctoral scholars to discuss visions of gender equity in engineering 130 years from now, whereall gender identities feel respected, experience gender equity, and are able to maintain a healthywork-life balance. The panelists reflected on their experiences on advancing womxn and genderequity in engineering, envisioned the progress that should be made in the coming 130 years, andshared ideas on how to achieve those visions, focusing on how dualistic thinking around genderand cis-normativity serve to marginalize womxn in engineering’s learning environments andworkplaces, as well as the critical ways that racial identity and gender intersect in womxn of colors’experiences
works from authors with diverse identities is present in theresearch. This paper documents the efforts that have been put in place so far aroundimplementing citation justice education at UMD libraries including developing instructionmodules and research guides. In particular, focusing on the librarians’ instigation of a closepartnership with the faculty and graduate students of the Civil and Environmental EngineeringDepartment (CEE) who were particularly receptive to expanding their scholarly communicationpractices to include aspects of citation justice. Additionally, it explores the potential to developfurther support for tools including code, templates, and author associations and lists that can beused to implement diverse citations. Future
that guide engineering research. I, and many of my colleagues, while noting the historyof marginalization of people who look and think like us in engineering contexts, beganquestioning the value systems that undergird the engineering research enterprise in which weoperate. We noted discrepancies between the espoused values of the enterprise and those thatwere enacted by some of the agents that operate in engineering research spaces. For example, inour graduate context, we noted an espoused desire for equity and inclusion alongside aperpetuation of stress culture, a centering of White theories in our foundational classes, and alack of accommodation for non-traditional and neurodivergent students. We began to questionother value systems having
University of Washington. Engineering education is her primary area of scholarship, and has been throughout her career. In her work, she currently focuses on the role of reflection in engineering student learning and the relationship of research and practice in engineering education. In recent years, she has been the co-director of the Consortium to Promote Reflection in Engineering Education (CPREE, funded by the Helmsley Charitable Trust), a member of the governing board for the International Research in Engineering Education Network, and an Associate Editor for the Journal of Engineering Education. Dr. Turns has published over 175 journal and conference papers on topics related to engineering education
the hassle and cost of relocation. • Students who have declared a major are more likely to succeed at the new institution [14], [15]. • Academic preparedness [27], [29]: If the new institution is tougher than the old one, some students tend to struggle. • Work/life/school balance, specifically for working students [27], [31]: The struggle to main- tain a balance between work and personal life compels some students to drop out or change their career path [33]. Adversities to life expectancy like COVID-19 disrupt the educational plans of students [10]. Students who did not have a balanced life found that it made them more tired and feel lower self-esteem, which gave them the
necessary to develop impactful, innovative, and successfulengineering solutions [9]–[11].In addition to preparing engineering students to successfully address modern engineeringproblems, the inclusion of comprehensive engineering skills in the curriculum has implicationsfor students’ engagement and persistence in the field. Students’ engagement in their field as wellas their plans to pursue an engineering career or engineering graduate education is determined inpart by an alignment between their personal and professional interests and values in engineeringand curricular messages about what engineering practice includes. For some students, thepotential to leverage engineering for social good is a key motivation for pursuing work in thefield [12
, particularly for secondary students.The course seeks to strike a balance between the level of rigor typically found in high schoolsand engineering college courses. The aim is twofold: first to reinforce the introduction andlearning of new knowledge to prepare the student for in-class dialogues and projects, and second,to challenge their comfort levels in terms of the amount of homework and effort required,thereby helping them adjust their habits. These habits include time management, organizationalstrategies, sustained critical reading and writing, and voluntary attention spans. Through thisapproach, students are actively engaged in cultivating the purpose, outcomes, and goals of theirlearning, with an emphasis on intrinsic motivation and student-led
evidence-based approaches to improve the engineering education environment. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Engineering While Black: Exploring the Experiences of Black University of Florida Undergraduate Engineering Students Using PhotovoiceAbstractBlack engineering students attending a predominantly white institution (PWI) must often navigateunwelcoming and hostile environments on their journey to degree attainment. Despiteencountering such adverse circumstances, these students persist to graduation, albeit at lower ratesthan their white counterparts. Addressing this discrepancy is a critical factor in improving diversityin the workforce. This
context of research involvement, positively influencedstudents’ success by fostering the development of students’ scientific identity and their beliefs intheir own abilities [8,9]. In addition, adequate socioemotional and culturally relevant mentoringseems to play an important role for the positive development of underrepresented students in thiscontext (e.g., first-generation college-going students) [10]. Unfortunately, these studies did notinvestigate the impact of faculty mentoring for transfer students in particular, leaving a gap inknowledge as to whether transfer students would benefit from these additional beneficialoutcomes as well.Apart from faculty mentoring, research also indicates that peer interaction and peer mentoringseems to
known as NetworkFellows (NF), who oversee communication between sites and document, plan, and implementprojects for network and site level activities. In practice, the AF team’s work is focused intenselyon planning the Assembly, while the NF team does its work continuously over a semester-longtimescale. The NF team is the focus of our study in this paper.The NF team is made up of student representatives from each site in Access. They are given astipend that is compensation for their work during their semester-long tenure. The NF teamincludes both undergraduate and graduate students, usually at a 2:1 ratio, respectively. Studentswho serve in this role may also be involved in their own site leadership; some NFs have gone onto become members of
facilitators andcreated three groups– each with two Faculty Fellows from different disciplines, three StudentFellows, and visiting student and PI faculty facilitators. Two of the Student Fellows in eachgroup had been brought into the project by a Faculty Fellow; the third was unaffiliated witheither Faculty Fellow. This was intended to help facilitate the development of interdisciplinaryconversations. Mines PIs and Student Fellows spent significant time with this material inadvance of the event. With that preparation, Student Fellows took a primary role in promptingconversation, making the workshop space more than just another conversation between faculty.With support from Mines PIs and visiting faculty facilitators, Student Fellows led FacultyFellows
what happened during the journey and to reconcile the new identity with the world that the student left behind. 16. Master of Two The student can exist in both the Her opportunities for independence are much different between Ireland Worlds “real” world (home) and the and home, where she will follow customs to live in her parents’ home special world (Ireland). until she marries. She enjoys more freedoms in Ireland, knows the expectations back home, and has ideas for how to strike an appropriate balance. 17. Freedom to Mastery leads
/ISEC49744.2020.9280745.[12] K. B. Lang, “The relationship between academic major and environmentalism among college students: Is it mediated by the effects of gender, political ideology and financial security?,” J. Environ. Educ., vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 203–215, 2011, doi: 10.1080/00958964.2010.547230.[13] T. Li and Y. Xie, “The evolution of demographic methods,” Soc. Sci. Res., vol. 107, p. 102768, Sep. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2022.102768.[14] S. L. Laursen, H. Thiry, and C. S. Liston, “The Impact of a University-Based School Science Outreach Program on Graduate Student Participants’ Career Paths and Professional Socialization,” J. High. Educ. Outreach Engagem., vol. 16, no. 2, p. 47, 2012.[15] B. A. Holland, “Factors and Strategies that
without truly realizing the problematic nature of their actions. StudentW (a Black woman) shared, “It’s not unintentional, but it’s not intentional small acts of racism,small comments that you make. You’re kind of unaware of it, but it’s just instilled within you…”The subtleness of microaggressions meant that students often second-guessed their own reactionsto the microaggression, or were quick to label microaggressive interactions as acts of curiosity asopposed to potential harms. For example, Student P (a Black woman) noted that if her classmatesasked questions about her identity they would preface anything potentially insulting with “no,I’m just asking.” Students within the study were often reluctant to label microaggressions asharmful, and