Proceedings of the 2019 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition.[7] Gupta, A. (2017, June). A practitioner account of integrating macro-ethics discussion in an engineering design class. In 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition.[8] Hess, J. L., & Fore, G. (2018). A systematic literature review of US engineering ethics interventions. Science and engineering ethics, 24, 551-583.[9] Winiecki, D., & Salzman, N. (2019, January). Analyzing and Working-Out Ways of Addressing Problems of Social-Justice in an Engineering or Computer-Science Context. In 2019 NSF REDCON (Revolutionizing Engineering & Computer Science Department CONference), Arlington, VA.[10] Gupta, A., Turpen, C., Philip, T., & Elby, A
1 Story-driven Learning in Higher Education: A Systematic Literature Review Abstract Stories have been a pervasive, ubiquitous feature of our lives throughout humanhistory—indeed, storytelling itself is robustly associated with a host of positive benefits,including better mental health (Robertson et al., 2019), increased empathy (Cummings et al.,2022), and a greater sense of belonging (Ritter et al., 2019). As such, storytelling has thepotential to be a powerful tool in a range of settings, including higher education (i.e., story-driven learning). To uncover how story-driven learning has been used in higher education sofar—as well as to discover patterns in pedagogical methods and
://archives.tricolib.brynmawr.edu/agents/corporate_entities/8575. Accessed March 2020.[2] Swarthmore College, “Swat History.” [Online]. Available: https://www.sccs.swarthmore.edu/users/03/dbing/history/academic.html. Accessed March 2020.[3] E.E. Morison, "New Liberal Arts", Change, 1986.[4] M. Kranzberg, “Educating the whole ENGINEER,” ASEE Prism, 1993.[5] S. Tobias, “Revisiting the New Liberal Arts Initiative, 1980-1990.” [Online]. Available: https://www.asee.org/documents/teagle/SloanNewLibArtProj.pdf. Accessed March 2020.[6] Wikipedia, “3-2 Engineering,” 2019. [Online]. Available: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/3- 2_engineering. Accessed March 2020.[7] J. D. Van Putten Jr., “Development of Engineering as a Liberal Arts Major,” in ASEE
attempting toimplement such assessments in their own contexts.IntroductionSTEM education plays a critical role in maintaining the nation’s position as a global leader intechnological innovation. Such innovation is necessary for addressing increasingly complexissues such as global warming and cybersecurity and requires a national workforce that consistsof diverse perspectives. Yet, extant cultures within the institutions that educate and train the nextgenerations of STEM professionals tend to privilege long-held majority perspectives of knowing,thinking, and doing in science and engineering. Such cultures are perpetuated through courseassessments, which students use to define and make meaning of their major (Stevens et al., 2014;Yoon et al., 2019
consider theimpact of engineering solutions in global, economic, environmental, and societal contexts” (p.8). FEIAP (2019) stipulates that “Engineering practice must consider economic, public health,safety, legal, social, environment and sustainability factors” (p. 2). Similarly, ENAEE (2021)states that Bachelor Degree Graduates must demonstrate an “awareness of the widermultidisciplinary context of engineering,” an “awareness of non-technical - societal, health andsafety, environmental, economic and industrial - implications of engineering practice (p. 11) the“ability [...] to recognise the importance of non-technical [...] constraints” (p. 9), and the “abilityto develop and design complex products (devices, artifacts, etc.), processes and
sociotechnical integration professional development proposal.Finally, we thank the Colorado School of Mines Office of Research and Technology Transfer foran internal planning grant that financially supported our research collaboration and intervieweeparticipation.References[1] W. E. Bijker and T. Pinch. Eds. The social construction of technological systems: New directions in the sociology and history of technology. MIT Press, 1987.[2] J. S. Rossmann and H. Stewart-Gambino, “Cornerstone design for sociotechnical ‘Grand Challenges,’” in Proc. 2019 ASEE Annu. Conf. & Expo., 2019.[3] G. D. Hoople and A. Choi-Fitzpatrick, Drones for good: How to bring sociotechnical thinking into the classroom. Springer Cham, 2020.[4] N. Andrade and D
modern challenges.References[1] K. Johnson, J. Leydens, B. Moskal, and S. Kianbakht, “Gear switching: From ‘technical vs. social’ to ‘sociotechnical’ in an introductory control systems course,” in 2016 American Control Conference (ACC), 2016, pp. 6640–6645.[2] K. Johnson et al., “The Development of Sociotechnical Thinking in Engineering Undergraduates,” in 2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2022.[3] B. Friedman and D. G. Hendry, Value sensitive design: Shaping technology with moral imagination. MIT Press, 2019.[4] S. Costanza-Chock, Design justice: Community-led practices to build the worlds we need. The MIT Press, 2020
-care.IntroductionResearch indicates that underrepresented students who participate in engineering education, likewomen, students of color, LBGTQIA+ students, and students with disabilities, may experience thecampus and classroom environments as alienating and hostile, which can cause feelings ofdisorientation and uncertainty and affect their mental well-being (Allen, 2017; Cech & Waidzunas, 2011;Godfrey, 2007; Harper, 2010; Haverkamp et al., 2019; Kimmerer, 2013; Lee, 2020; Liptow et al., 2016;Lord & Camacho, 2013; Rice & Alfred, 2014; Riley, 2008, 2013; Seron et al., 2015, 2018; Slaton, 2013;Stonyer, 2002; Tate & Linn, 2005). Further, the culture of engineering education has been identified as abarrier to increasing the participation of
©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 2023 ASEE Annual Conference Applying STS to Engineering Education: A Comparative Study of STS Minors MC Forelle, Kent Wayland, and Bryn Seabrook University of Virginia/University of Virginia/University of VirginiaAbstract In recent years, the field of Science and Technology Studies (STS) has seen tremendousgrowth in universities across the United States. A subset of these new STS programs are beingintegrated in engineering and other STEM-focused institutions, frequently in the form of STSminors. The purpose of this study is to expand on previous work by Neeley, Wiley, andSeabrook
/accreditation-policy-and-procedure-manual-appm-2023-2024/[5] Hoople, Gordon D., and Austin Choi-Fitzpatrick. Drones for good: How to bringsociotechnical thinking into the classroom. Springer, 2022.[6] Reddy, Elizabeth, and Juan C. Lucena. "Engagement in practice paper: Engineering studentsvs. geological risk in the gold supply chain: Using geological risk in gold mining communities toovercome technical instrumentalism among engineering students." In ASEE Annual Conference& Exposition. 2019.[7] National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. The Integration of theHumanities and Arts with Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine in Higher Education: Branchesfrom the Same Tree. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2018.[8] Snow, Charles
Paper ID #39198Divergence and Convergence in Engineering Leadership, Entrepreneurship,Management, and PolicyDr. Kathryn A. Neeley, University of Virginia Kathryn Neeley is Associate Professor of Science, Technology, and Society in the Engineering & So- ciety Department of the School of Engineering and Applied Science. She is a past chair of the Liberal Education/Engineering & Society Division of ASEE and isDr. Rider W. Foley, California State University, Channel Islands Dr. Rider W. Foley is an assistant professor in the science, technology & society program in the De- partment of Engineering and Society at the
knowledge and skills in both. Also, this work providesa novel perspective from individuals who might not have necessarily experienced traditional conceptionsand practices of engineering, which are often artificially separated from societal contexts andresponsibility.References[1] W. K. Jenkins, “Today’s Engineering Education Is a Liberal Arts Education of the Future [Point of View],” Proc. IEEE, vol. 102, no. 9, pp. 1306–1309, 2014.[2] S. B. Sample, “Engineering education and the liberal arts tradition,” IEEE Trans. Educ., vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 54–57, 1988.[3] K. L. S. Bernhardt and J. S. Rossmann, “An integrative education in engineering and the liberal arts: An institutional case study,” in 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Conference Proceedings.” Paper presented at 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference. https://peer.asee.org/37866.[2] Polmear, M., Bielefeldt, A.R., Knight, D., Swan, C., & Canney, N.E. (2019). “Hidden Curriculum Perspective on the Importance of Ethics and Societal Impacts in Engineering Education.” Paper presented at 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition.[3] Simmons, D.R., & Groen, C.J. (2018). “Increasing Impact of the Hidden Curriculum: Exploring Student Outcomes from Out-of-Class Activities.” Paper presented at 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition.[4] Villanueva, I., Gelles, L.A., Di Stefano, M., Smith, B., Tull, R.G., Lord, S.M., Benson, L., Hunt, A.T., Riley, D.M., & Ryan, G.W. (2018). “What
transgender and gender nonconforming engineering undergraduate experiences through autoethnography," in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Tampa, FL, June 2019.[16] B. E. Hughes, ""Managing by not managing": How gay engineering students manage sexual orientation," J. Coll. Stud. Dev., vol. 58, no. 3, pp. 385-401, 2017, doi: 10.1353/csd.2017.0029.[17] oSTEM, "About oSTEM," oSTEM, n.d. [Online]. Available: http://www.ostem.org/.[18] NOGLSTP. "NOGLSTP is Out to Innovate." National Organization of Gay and Lesbian Science and Technical Professionals. https://noglstp.org/ (accessed February 24, 2023).[19] K. Yoshino, Covering: The hidden assault on our civil rights. New York City: Random House (in English
they do not continue reproducing unfair neo-colonial practices andassumptions of past development practices. Here we explore how STS concepts have servedengineering students to develop critical praxis, a more robust and responsible understanding ofthe relationships between engineering faculty, students, and communities, and the materialand social worlds in which they are embedded, using community development projects relatedto artisanal gold mining, inclusive management of electronic waste, and water access forunderserved communities as examples.BackgroundAs shown in our 2022 ASEE paper [1], pedagogies of formation are explorations that implicatethe self in questioning “what engineering is for” and how answers to these questions begin toshow
building, and macroethics in science education. She received her PhD in physics at the Uni- versity of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign in 2019, where she focused on mastery-style online learning for engineers in a large preparatory physics course. In her postdoctoral work at Texas State University, she co-developed and implemented curricula to engage students in conversations about ethics, science and society, with a research interest in how to best support students and instructors in these conversations. She recently finished a AAAS Science & Technology Policy Fellowship at the National Science Foundation, supporting and working with the Hispanic-Serving Institutions (HSI) Program. She is also an organizer for the
. She also earned a graduate certificate in human-centered design (HCD) from the Interdisciplinary Graduate Education Program at Virginia Tech. Marie’s interest in values and engagement in professional cultures also extends to innovation and its experts.With Matthew Wisnioski and Eric Hintz, Marie co-editedDoes America Need More Innova- tors?(MIT Press, 2019). This project engages innovation’s champions, critics, and reformers in critical participation.Dr. Aubrey Wigner, Colorado School of Mines Aubrey Wigner is an assistant professor at the Colorado School of Mines where he teaches engineering design, entrepreneurship, and systems design.Dr. Dean Nieusma, Colorado School of Mines Dean Nieusma is Department
Interactive Timeline, last updated April 21, 2021, https://humanorigins.si.edu/evidence/human-evolution-interactive-timeline[4] J. Hamilton, “Myth Busting: The Truth About Animals And Tools,” National Public Radio, 2011. https://www.npr.org/2011/12/23/143833929/myth-busting-the-truth-about-animals-and-to ols (accessed Feb. 24, 2023).[5] D. Fraga, “The Manifesto of Ontological Design,” Medium, 2020. https://medium.datadriveninvestor.com/the-manifesto-of-ontological-design-7fdb191691 07 (accessed Feb. 24, 2023).[6] S. Fernandez, A. Kumar, and M. T. Alkattan, “Solidarity Engineering using a Pedagogy of Love,” presented at the ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, 2022.[7] D. Walls, “The
Press, 2017.[2] P. Nagy, R. Wylie, J. Eschrich, and E. Finn. “Facing the Pariah of Science: TheFrankenstein Myth as a Social and Ethical Reference for Scientists,” Science and EngineeringEthics, vol. 26, pp. 737-759, 2020.[3] J. Canino and K. B. Teichert. (2019, June). A Frankenstein-inspired Engineering DesignProject. Presented at 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Tampa, Florida. [Online].Available: https://peer.asee.org/a-frankenstein-inspired-engineering-design-project[4] H. Markus and P. Nurius, “Possible Selves,” American Psychologist, vol. 41, no. 9, pp.954-969, Sep. 1986.[5] M. Shelley, Frankenstein: Or, the Modern Prometheus, M. Hindle, Notes, E. Kostova,Introduction, New York, NY, USA: Penguin Books, 2007.[6
) advancing engineering design research by integrating new theoretical or analytical frameworks (e.g., from data science or complexity science) and (3) conducting design-based research to develop scaffolding tools for supporting the learning of complex skills like design. He is the Division Chair Elect for the Design in Engineering Education Division for the 2023 ASEE conference.Dr. Jessica E S Swenson, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York Jessica Swenson is an Assistant Professor at the University at Buffalo. She was awarded her doctorate and masters from Tufts University in mechanical engineering and STEM education respectively, and completed postdoctoral work at the University of Michigan. Her current
/s40594-020-00241-4.[3] W. Faulkner, “Dualisms, Hierarchies and Gender in Engineering,” Soc. Stud. Sci., vol. 30, no. 5, pp. 759–792, Oct. 2000, doi: 10.1177/030631200030005005.[4] E. O. McGee, Black, brown, bruised: how racialized STEM education stifles innovation. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard Education Press, 2020.[5] E. A. Cech and T. J. Waidzunas, “Navigating the heteronormativity of engineering: the experiences of lesbian, gay, and bisexual students,” Eng. Stud., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 1–24, Apr. 2011, doi: 10.1080/19378629.2010.545065.[6] M. Jennings, R. Roscoe, N. Kellam, and S. Jayasuriya, “A Review of the State of LGBTQIA+ Student Research in STEM and Engineering Education,” in 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference
understanding for solving problems, decision-making, anddesign. In turn, these abilities to act ethically, think critically, and empathize are essential skillsfor success in the workplace [23].Courses and AssignmentsCourses. Two courses were carried out where problem-solving assignments were analyzed.These HDSTEM courses were team-taught, pairing an engineering instructor with a historyinstructor: “HONS 1301: War, Machine, Culture, and Society: History and Engineering in theSecond World War” at TTU in the fall of 2019 and “HIST 255: History of World War II” at RITin the fall of 2022. Both engineering instructors were industrial engineers covering the STEMcontent. Historians were a specialist in European and Italian history for TTU and a specialist
transformative worldviews, which "holdsthat research inquiry needs to be intertwined with politics and a political change agenda toconfront social oppression at whatever levels it occurs" [16, p. 9]. The authors acknowledge thepotential detrimental effects that oppressive forms of communication can have on the subsequentdecisions and actions of marginalized and minoritized students in disciplines like, but not limitedto, engineering.Research Question: The research question that drove this study is: What are the emotions expressed bystudents about who should and shouldn’t become and belong in engineering and how are theyconnecting these to active or passive HC experiences?Research Design and Instrument: Between 2018 and 2019, a mixed-method
(RESPECT), Philadelphia, PA, USA, 2022, pp. 1–2.[5] A. Haverkamp, “The complexity of nonbinary gender inclusion in engineering culture,” presented at the 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Salt Lake City, UT, USA, Jun. 23–27, 2018.[6] P. H. Collins and S. Bilge, Intersectionality. Cambridge, U.K.: Polity Press, 2016.[7] P. H. Collins, “Intersectionality’s definitional dilemmas,” Annual Review of Sociology, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 1–20, 2015.[8] T. J. Weston, W. M. Dubow and A. Kaminsky, “Predicting women’s persistence in computer science- and technology-related majors from high school to college,” ACM Transactions on Computing Education, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 1–16, 2019.[9] A. Munson, B. Moskal, A
engineering curriculum using practice architectures," European Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 44, no. 1/2, pp. 71-84, 2019.[5] P. M. Davies, R. J. Passonneau, S. Muresan and Y. Gao, "Analytical Techniques for Developing Argumentative Writing in STEM: A Pilot Study," IEEE Transactions on Education, vol. 65, no. 3, p. 373–383, 2022.[6] M. Biango-Daniels and M. Sarvary, "A challenge in teaching scientific communication: academic experience does not improve undergraduates’ ability to assess their or their peers’ writing," Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, vol. 46, no. 5, p. 809–820, 2021.[7] J. T. Kramer, J. Zeccardi, C. A. Emhoff, C. Williams, Dunn, R. J., & Rose, J. , R. J. Dunn and J. Rose, "How Timing and