teaches advanced undergraduate laboratory courses and manages the senior capstone program in the Micron School. He ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Building a Communication-Integrated Curriculum in Materials ScienceAbstractWith the need to meet ABET outcomes around professional skills, such as communication andteamwork, engineering programs have long explored approaches to ensure their graduates areable to participate in the workplace in ways that employers demand. While approaches vary andsuccess depends on a number of factors, research demonstrates that an integrated approach toprofessional skill development is the most impactful for student learning. How can anengineering program build an
Paper ID #37173GIFTS: Building a sense of connection to campus and engineering identitythrough information literacyDr. Jessica Ohanian Perez, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona Jessica Ohanian Perez is an assistant professor in Electromechanical Engineering Technology at Califor- nia State Polytechnic University, Pomona with a focus on STEM pedagogy. Jessica earned her doctorate in education, teaching, learning and culture from Claremont Graduate UniversityMr. Paul Hottinger, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona Paul R. Hottinger is an associate librarian in the Research and Instruction Services unit
improved to support student mental health,reduce attrition rates, and bridge the gender and ethno-racial gaps in graduation rates, makingdoctoral education a more viable career path for engineers.Identity development in engineering doctoral students Research on identity development in engineering students has primarily focused onundergraduates, and only a handful have considered identity development in graduate students[1], [2], [3], [4]. Because engineering graduate students, and especially doctoral students, oftenmatriculate with professional experience, researchers have assumed that graduate students enterdoctoral programs with a ready-made professional identity as engineers. However, training indoctoral engineering programs requires
, and she has co-authored three popular textbooks, most recently Digital Design and Computer Architecture: RISC-V Edition in 2021.Dr. Yingtao Jiang, University of Nevada - Las VegasChristine ClarkEd JorgensenTiberio Garza, Florida International UniversityNorma A Marrun, University of Nevada - Las VegasValerie L. Taylor ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Promoting Success Through Building Community for Computer Science and Computer Engineering Undergraduates Sarah L. Harris, Christine Clark, Norma A. Marrun, Edward Jorgensen, Yingtao Jiang, Valerie Taylor, Tiberio Garza University of Nevada, Las Vegas (all except T. Garza), Florida International
, veneration of engineering’s “hardness” persists, including as symbolically yetpotently represented through the endurance of weed-out culture. At our institution, discoursearound engineering’s inherent difficulty, a celebration of our students’ “grit” in the face ofacademic adversity, and a hazing-like narrative around student “suffering” all endure despiteextensive, systematic attention to student mental health and the importance of “work-lifebalance” across the university community. Research indicates that emotionally unsafeenvironments lead to stress, lower attendance at school, and less engagement in learning,whereas emotionally safe environments are related to more positive identity development, betterlearning experiences, and greater feelings
focuses on communication, collabo- ration, and identity in engineering. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Investigating Graduate Students’ Perspectives of Influences on Interdisciplinary Scholar Identity Development: An Ecological Systems Theory ApproachAbstractSpanning hundreds of higher education institutions, the surge in interdisciplinary graduateprograms designed to prepare the future STEM professoriate for the grand challenges, big ideas,and demands for convergence is difficult to ignore. These interdisciplinary graduate programspose great opportunities for expanding the professional skills and knowledge base of STEMgraduate students, but they exist
, identity building, and coping for boththe producer and the consumer [27], [28]. Moreover, social media and memes have beenidentified as an important medium through which minoritized graduate students, especially atprimarily white institutions, can build social support, challenge racialized stereotyping, solicitadvice, and practice self-care [28], [29].Meme-producers often leverage techniques such as hyperbole, humor, and dark humor toexaggerate their lived-experiences in the quest for “relatability,” likes, and retweets. While manyindividuals [27] including the present authors, have associated graduate school memes withfeeling less alone in their programs and development of their identity as graduate students, thesesame memes may serve to
, conflict management, innovation, andoral and written communication. The need for effective communication permeates through everyengineering discipline. The accrediting board for engineering programs in the US and manyschools abroad is ABET, and they define student outcomes as “what students are expected toknow and be able to do by the time of graduation.” One of the Student Outcomes is (3)“demonstrate an ability to communicate effectively with a range of audiences” [9]. Clearly,discipline-specific vision statements see communication as an essential component in theprofessionalization of the modern engineer. As educational institutions follow suit, students willneed to become fluent in managing personal narrative and mission in online contexts—as
on students’ identity, asking:RQ1: How does an open-ended, real-world problem influence the development of studentengineering identity?RQ2: How do open-ended, real-world problems generate a sense of engineering identity?BackgroundThe engineering education community has recently shown high interest in the study ofengineering identity development in undergraduate students, which has been found to haveimportant links to student retention and education, perhaps particularly for students frompopulations underrepresented in engineering [6], [7], [10]. Godwin’s work on the developmentof a survey instrument to measure engineering identity [1] has been widely cited and used withinthe field in recent work. Godwin’s instrument employs a three-factor
, persistence, and career trajectories; engineering writing and communication; and methodological development. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023Capturing attrition decisions in engineering graduate students using longitudinal SMS dataKeywords: Attrition, longitudinal study, SMS (Short Message Service), time series dataAbstractThis research paper reports results from a longitudinal Short Message Service (SMS) text messagesurvey study that captured attrition decisions from engineering graduate students who decided toleave their Ph.D. program or change degree objectives from Ph.D. to M.S. (Master’s-leveldeparture). While past research has investigated doctoral attrition across disciplines to
, presentations, and web materials to support numerous initiatives related to graduate student professional development, graduate assistant training, and other enrolled student services.Dawayne WhittingtonJuanda Johnson-Taylor ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 NCLSAMP Bridges to the Doctorate: Preparing future minority Ph.D. researchers (PFMPR) through a holistic graduate student development modelIntroductionWhile there are initiatives, such as the Alliance for Graduate Education and the Professoriate(AGEP) embedded in universities across the country that focus on preparing the next generationof science, technology, engineering, and math scholars who are prepared to enter the STEM
investigate the ways that peer mentorship affectssense of belonging and discipline identity for students from varied matriculation points.IntroductionAs higher education institutions foster increasingly diverse undergraduate populations, it isimperative that student success initiatives purposefully develop students’ sense of belongingwithin an institution, a campus, a peer community, and an academic discipline. Belonging is acritical dimension of student success affecting a student’s degree of academic adjustment,persistence, and post-graduate aspirations, while also contributing to institutional benchmarkslike retention and degree completion [1]. Additionally, the decline in the number of traditional-age college students after 2025, a result of the
experience in the workforce before pursuing graduate school. Lewis Ngwenya has been working with Dr. Dodson to research how humanitarian engineering projects impact professional formation and views of diversity, equity, and inclusion.Ms. Hannah Grace Duke, Lipscomb University Hannah Duke is an undergraduate student in the Raymond B. Jones College of Engineering at Lipscomb University. Hannah is studying mechanical engineering and plans to continue on to graduate school, following the completion of her undergraduate degree, to ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Creating Inclusive Engineers through Humanitarian Engineering: Quantitative Results from a
families to hands-on STEM experiences. Henderson’s research interests are in engineering identity development among Black men. He was most recently recognized by INSIGHT Into Diversity Magazine as an Inspiring STEM Leader, the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign with the College of Liberal Arts & Sciences (LAS) Outstanding Young Alumni Award, and Career Communications Group with a Black Engineer of the Year Award for college- level promotion of engineering education. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Paper ID 39415 Contemplating Quality: Conceptions of
Engineering Education at Virginia Tech, where she directs the Virginia Tech Engineering Communications Center (VTECC). Her research focuses on communication, collabo- ration, and identity in engineering.Margaret Webb, Virginia Tech Margaret (Maggie) Webb is a master’s and Ph.D. student in sustainable land development (civil engi- neering) and engineering education, respectively, at Virginia Tech. She graduated with her mechanical engineering degree from Rice University and worked for ExxonMobil as a subsea engineer and as a high school STEM teacher in a Houston charter school before starting grad school. Her research interests in- clude supporting the needs of displaced engineering students, understanding the supports and
Paper ID #38035Board 155: Broadening Participation and the Mission of Engineering forUS All (e4usa) through Design Projects That Engage Students withDisabilities as Stakeholders (Work in Progress)Dr. Jennifer Kouo, The Institute for Innovation in Development, Engagement, and Learning Systems (IDE-ALS) at the Johns Hopkins University School of Education Dr. Jennifer Kouo is an Assistant Research Scientist at the IDEALS Institute. Jennifer’s areas of expertise include Universal Design for Learning, technology integration, assistive technologies, and serving stu- dents with a range of disabilities, particularly autism spectrum
treatment in stored grains and 2) innovate instructional strategies for Biologicaland Agricultural Engineering students. She is also a Member of the Engineering Education Faculty, In-stitute for Engineering Education and Innovation, Food Science Graduate Faculty, and MultidisciplinaryEngineering Graduate Faculty groups at Texas A&M University. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023Abstract Effective mentoring is critical to the success of graduate students; however, manymentors lack the skills and resources necessary to provide comprehensive support. To addressthis issue, the STAND model offers a framework for faculty mentors to guide and support theirstudents through five main actions: setting
tocomplex crises, and recognize the importance of sustainability to future national competitivenessand growth.1,2,5–7 Educators and students are similarly rallying for changes to better address andforestall environmental and social challenges through sustainability. Engineers are poised to helpcreate this sea change because they impact nearly every industry and everything human-made.Through their design and execution decisions, engineers directly and indirectly influence thecreation of everything from consumer goods to hardware and software products to buildings andmodes of transportation, thus their decisions make positive or negative impacts on the planet andits people, today and into the future.5 For engineers to contribute in a positive and
resources can be harnessed tocommunicate technical ideas to others in their discipline to get them to understand new ideas andthen take action based on that information [3]. This challenge is prevalent in academia, morespecifically in engineering-serving institutions.Engineering programs across various institutions have integrated professional communicationskills through community engagement projects, dovetailed with existing assignments inengineering courses, or have developed a separate communication for engineers course [4-7].These programs have utilized collaborative efforts from Engineering, English, Communication,Education, and Applied Linguistics faculty [7-11]. The challenges often encountered are theintegration techniques and logistics
Department of Mechanical Engineering at Penn- sylvania State University. She earned her B.S. in Chemistry from The University of South Dakota, her M.S. in Aeronautical and Astronautical Engineering and her PhD in Engineering Education from Purdue University. Her research expertise lies in characterizing graduate-level attrition, persistence, and career trajectories; engineering writing and communication; and methodological development. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Burnout: The Cost of Masking Neurodiversity in Graduate STEM ProgramsAbstractA growing body of literature suggests that neurodivergent individuals, such as those with autism
laboratory, there also needs to be an appropriate amount of rigor in the coursecontent to help close the gap in preparation for subsequent undergraduate-level STEM courses. Ablend of fun and technical content can lead to increased student engagement [29]. The coursewill develop critical thinking and problem-solving skills and tools that will benefit students in awide range of general education courses. At USAFA, along with humanities, social sciences, andbasic sciences, general education requirements include 15 semester hours of engineering courses.Skills such as literature review, project management, and technical communication, whichstudents will practice in this first-year course, are expected to be useful in several future coursesand in their
Paper ID #36904Relationship between High School STEM Self-Competency and Behavior ina Parametric Building Design ActivityStephanie Bunt, The Pennsylvania State UniversityLaura HinkleAndrew WaltonDr. Nathan C. Brown ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Relationship between High School STEM Self-Competency and Behavior in a Parametric Building Design ActivityBuilding designers receive discipline-specific education which prepares them to address distinctdesign goals, but they may struggle to address criteria not considered part of their professionbased on their disciplinary identity. In STEM subjects
first-and second-year graduate students in the biomedical engineering program were enrolled in theseseminar courses since they are required to complete a degree (BS/MS/PhD) in biomedicalengineering at PSU. Second, these seminar courses provide professional development forbiomedical engineering students by presenting current research and career opportunities throughweekly invited speakers. The overall professional development learning objectives of the courseswere compatible with our education modules designed to increase student understanding andcompetency of topics related to diversity, equity, and inclusion. Third, the format of the courses(i.e., weekly invited speakers) made it easy to insert our content into the curriculum. During each
a 29 year career in the Consumer Packaged Goods, Pharma- ceuticals, and Agricultural Chemical Industries to lead the four School of Engineering Technical Leader- ship and Communication (TLC) Programs – the Gordon-MIT Program in Engineering Leadership (GEL), the Undergraduate Practice Opportunities Program (UPOP), the Graduate Engineering Leadership Pro- gram (GradEL), and the School of Engineering Communication Lab. Immediately prior to MIT, Reza was the Vice-president of Research, Development, and Innovation for the Specialty Division of the Clorox Company. In that role he was accountable for developing innova- tion strategies for a diverse set of businesses and ensuring robust technology roadmaps and innovation
Paper ID #38378Better together: Co-design and co-teaching as professional developmentLynn Mandeltort, University of VirginiaDr. Priya Date, University of VirginiaDr. Amy M. Clobes, University of Virginia Dr. Amy M. Clobes is committed to supporting current and future graduate students as Assistant Dean for Graduate Affairs for the University of Virginia School of Engineering and Applied Science. In her current role, Dr. Clobes collaborates to support existing programs and develops new initiatives in graduate student recruitment, training, education, and career and professional development. Dr. Clobes holds a B.S. in
programs was $5,665 [24] or approximately one-third thecost of the University of Minnesota.F. Engineering Pathway“Community Colleges play a key role in preparing Americans to enter the workforce withassociate’s degrees or certificates or to transition to four-year educational institutions” [2].Nearly half (47%) of all U. S. students who earned bachelor’s degrees in science andengineering between 2010 and 2017 did some coursework at a community college, and 18%earned associate degrees [2]. Students can take the first two years of a four-year engineeringdegree at a community college, and then transfer to and graduate from a four-year engineeringprogram. This is considered the community college pathway toward a Bachelor of Sciencedegree in
centered on the ability of community engagement to change theirperceptions of populations, its role in confidence building, the sense of contribution as amotivation factor, and the idea that community engagement is the only tool to receive suchintangible and priceless benefits. The final theme entailed three concepts that focused primarilyon sheer enjoyment and fun participants and students found in the event, the importance ofhands-on experiences to promote such engagement, and the usage of hands-on activities to createcuriosity and engage in problem-solving.A. Community Engagement in Student IdentityRecent studies suggest that outreach as a context for developing retention-oriented identities hasled many students to seek formal volunteer
, altmetrics, and patron use data of electronic resources. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Mapping Graduate Student Workshops to Career Readiness FrameworksAbstractAlong with campus collaborators, the Colorado School of Mines library has facilitated aworkshop series for graduate students since 2019. Recent developments inspired us to re-examine past workshop offerings in the context of career readiness. To understand strengths andweaknesses in workshop coverage, we compared our past offerings to frameworks from thePerkins Collaborative Research Network (PCRN) and the National Association of Colleges andEmployers (NACE). The results of this effort highlight strengths and weaknesses of theworkshop series
research. In our classes,they learn how to apply the socially responsible engineering (SRE) framework, whichemphasizes “contextual listening” [63] and identification of opportunities to create value withstakeholders so they can empathically engage communities before, during and after their fieldresearch [64]. Through specific coursework assignments, they explore and reflect with otherson the reasons for being in HES and for wanting to do sustainable community development, toexplore the constraints, opportunities, and pathways placed in front of them by the histories oftheir families, of engineering, of development, and by the multiple dimensions of their identity(gender, race, ethnicity, national origin, sexual orientation, etc.). Then
surveys from the Graduate Student Experience in the Research University (gradSERU)online service. The fellows recognized several gaps in Purdue’s graduate mentoring experiencethat needed to be addressed: an engineering-specific individual development plan (IDP), surveysof faculty members, and educating students about taboo mentorship topics.An IDP was created for PhD or master’s students in the College of Engineering. The document isintended to guide students through four steps: a skillset self-assessment, goals for Year 1 ofgraduate school, a meeting between student and advisor, and progress updates after the first year.The IDP was published on the university website and distributed among the engineeringdepartments in August 2022 and has since