theory, which has been used to analyze students’motivation to persist in rigorous engineering programs (Matusovich, 2013).Similarly, religious identity refers to similar characteristics, values, and beliefs and directly affectsbehaviors of many individuals within the communities. For more than a generation, studies have shownreligiously engaged individuals to be more civically engaged (Wuthnow, 1999; Lewis, Mcgregor &Putnum, 2013; Rockenbach, 2020). This characteristic may directly relate to women from religiouscommunities finding more meaning in careers such as engineering as they relate to contributions tobroader society.Women are less prominent in engineering fields than men (Pawley 2019). While there has been growthand change in recent
for all and expand opportunities for those traditionally underserved andmarginalized in engineering to pursue careers as engineers and expand the STEM workforcepipeline. IntroductionThe societal role of engineers has steadily evolved from a technical problem solver to that of a“technical mediator,” in which engineers engage with stakeholders to define the problem, ideate,and develop solutions [1,2]. Yet, engineering curricula still tends to focus on guiding studentsthrough problems that can be answered in a single, technical solution [3], ignoring thecomplexities needed to prepare students to solve real world problems [3, 4]. As stated bySchwartz et al. [2], “of particular interest to educators are
significant real-world problems and strengthen theintegration of knowledge, understanding, and practices of engineering within STEM (1). Another affordance ofSTEM partnership is bringing in STEM professionals to support content teachers are transferring to students (2).Many students have yet to learn first-hand how their math and science courses relate to careers they may beinterested in pursuing (1). The engineering education partnership in this paper aims for the primary STEM educationgoals of ensuring students spark interest and excitement in STEM, understand STEM content and knowledge,engage in STEM reasoning and computational thinking, reflect on STEM, use the tools and languages of STEM, andidentify with STEM Enterprise (1). As
scholarship.Engineering Identity DevelopmentCareer identity is the construct that individuals formulate around their perception of themselvesand their career choice. Therefore, engineering identity can be defined as the construct thatengineering students and professionals construct at the intersection of their perception ofthemselves and their career in engineering [8-9]. Research shows that engineering identity isdirectly correlated to personal values that can assist in the development of becoming an engineerand their understanding of engineering as a field. This development can lead to the enhancementof the altruistic and individualistic goals of engineering students [8]. Student’s engineeringidentity development is needed for a growing engineering program and
student experience.To extend understandings of interdisciplinary scholar development beyond students’ immediatesurroundings and to incorporate graduate students’ perspectives into this research space, thisstudy takes a qualitative approach grounded in Ecological Systems Theory [4][5]. The dataconsist of 48 semi-structured interviews with students in an interdisciplinary graduate program,spanning four program cohorts and three years. The study investigates how the broader academicsocial environment in which interdisciplinary graduate students operate influences students’abilities to see themselves as interdisciplinary scholars and align their studies with convergentresearch career goals.Ultimately this longitudinal qualitative case study suggests
country [26], [18]. Finally,with long-term orientation Ecuador does not have a score within the Hofstede tool fornow, however in the United States its low score reflects that citizens are not pragmatic,this is reinforced in that Americans have strong ideas about what is good or bad so theycan refer to issues such as abortion the use of drugs among other controversial issues,also in the country companies measure performance in the short term, this drives peopleto seek to obtain quick results [26].Through the national analysis provided by the Hofstede tool, it is possible to consider apoint of reference to make the academic comparison between construction careers in thetwo universities of study, for example, in Ecuador due to the high score in
eitherstudent success or engineering lab tours. The student success topics presented to the on-sitestudents included time management, GPA calculation, resume building and internshipopportunities, library services, and personal learning styles.The faculty lectures discussed the engineering design process; engineering disciplines;importance of mathematics in engineering, chemistry and computers in engineering; leanmanufacturing; engineering mechanics; data analysis and visualization; ethics; professionallicensure; and career searches. Content varied from material that would be included infreshmen engineering courses to material that introduced advanced (upper-level) engineeringcourses. The portion of the SBP program involving industry professionals as
indicates the presence of all fourpathways. All results taken together demonstrate how understanding individuals’ experiencesthrough early childhood and high school can evolve or stagnate with age and development.1. IntroductionIt is the unique experiences and perceptions of an individual which develop personal identity;often each of those experiences are heavily influenced by others surrounding us [1-2]. One’schoice in a college, or major, or even a particular career path is shaped by both positive andnegative perceptions of prior experiences, often emerging from passions or interests developedthroughout childhood [3]. Perception is a subjective evaluation of these experiences, and thus,positive and negative experiences differ from person to
explanation of the situation based on my own experiences.Table 2Composite Narrative ExampleComposite Narrative Excerpt Direct Quote from Manager Decisions in Developing a Narrative ThreadAs a recent graduate, Sofia is excited So we had hired in November of last year, an Each of the three excerpts focused on anto be a design engineer – a role she is engineer, mid-career probably about 10 years engineer at a different career stage (late, mid,passionate about and has experience of experience, to come in as a design or early). I chose to use the mid-career designin. She starts her new position, and engineer on a specific project. The project engineer example with the early
case for using undergraduates in research by discussing the benefits of usingthem in research programs; it also identifies some pitfalls. Based on these observations and theliterature, the recommendation is made to engage undergraduates in research early in theiracademic career, during their first or second year. Benefits for undergraduates in research overtheir academic career can result in these students continuing with the graduate program at theirhome institution or at other institutions.The Kern Foundation recognized the importance of undergraduates in research and sponsored aRequest for Proposal (RFP) to address this topic. A collaboration of five universities from theKern Entrepreneurial Engineering Network (KEEN) answered the RFP and
, departments and universities often rely on aprofessional development driven approach to establish community. While useful, these effortsare misdirected because literature shows that women’s isolation and lack of sense of community,rather than lack of career preparedness, contribute to attrition from graduate programs. To besteradicate this isolation and lack of belonging among graduate women in engineering, we took auser-centered approach. Community-led, stakeholder-centric, participatory research is astakeholder-owned means by which to elicit community member needs. This process translatesinto strategies that are developed by community members themselves to address those needs.The authors of this paper developed a pilot survey distributed to all
two workshops conducted in 2022 with 56 participants as examples. Thefirst workshop was for a group associated with 9 North Carolina State University CollegeAdvising Corps (CAC) members, recent college graduates who may or may not have a STEMdegree. These CAC advisors with high school students in rural parts of the state to advise themalong career pathways. The second workshop was for 49 teachers in a K-8 STEM schoolneeding to understand integrated STEM instruction and get ideas for nearly immediateimplementation in their classrooms. Both groups needed orientation with regards to authenticengineering for K-12 students, as well as an understanding of engineering careers. Bothworkshops included hands-on engineering activities, discussion of
we take a different tack, wanting to identify the nexus, or common ground, ofInnovative and Entrepreneurial self-efficacies, and Innovative and Entrepreneurial behaviors.Thinking about common ground is a useful lens with which to look at the intentional or focusedcreativity of engineers, whether they are working in new or existing enterprises. First, we showthe development of this intersectional/nexus concept (which we call Embracing New Ideas, ENI)in terms of measures of self-efficacy (ENI-SE; consisting of six items, with a Cronbach’s Alphaof .85) and behavior (ENI-B; consisting of five items, with a Cronbach’s Alpha of .80). Thenbased on Social Cognitive Career Theory (SCCT), we model ENI-B (our dependent variable) asa function of ENI-SE
Transfer Partnership program is to increase bachelor’sdegree completion of low-income transfer students.Our initial efforts focused on identifying shared data needs around student success barriers,establishing inter-institutional data sharing protocols, and developing a framework to significantlyincrease, diversify, and enhance our existing outreach, recruitment and academic advisingpractices in support of these students. We present a holistic data model for transfer pathway(Academic Success, Career Preparation, College and Transfer Navigation, Basic Needs andFunding, and Psychological Factors) to build on the Transfer Student Capital model [6] to obtaina more complete understanding of educational barriers as they interplay with each other.BIPOC
. Derrick James Satterfield, University of Nevada, Reno Derrick Satterfield is a doctoral candidate in Engineering Education at the University of Nevada, Reno. His research focuses on engineering graduate students’ experiences and motivation centered on career planning and preparation.Dr. Adam Kirn, University of Nevada, Reno Adam Kirn is an Associate Professor of Engineering Education at University of Nevada, Reno. His research focuses on the interactions between engineering cultures, student motivation, and their learning experiences. His projects involve the study of studenDr. Alexandra Coso Strong, Florida International University As an assistant professor of engineering education at Florida International University
, The Boeing Company (Space Division), Alcatel, USA (Alcatel-Lucent) and the Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA). My professional goals consist of achieving the position of Senior Executive Service (SES) member within the Department of Defense (DoD). Afterwards, I would like to pursue either a research position at a national laboratory, think-tank, or board of directors and/or academia as a second career. I am a certified scuba diver, I enjoyed skydiving, trying different foods/eating, traveling the world, live sporting events/comedy shows, attending events such as Homecoming at Prairie View A&M University, spending time with my family, friends, fraternity brothers, and love ones!Dr. Janie M. Moore, Texas A&M
to expand across the globe 4 butstill primarily focusing on the “employability/ placement” as the objective5.It is important not only that a student be employable at the end of his/ her graduation, but thats/he continues to remain employable for the rest of the career by staying relevant and future-ready, particularly in the sectors that adopt rapidly transforming technologies.Can the WIL model of education, which has been found successful in meeting theemployability demand serve the graduates to remain relevant? Can such a model be used tomeet the continuing education needs of the people at scale without compromising on the 1A descriptive study of
incorporate inclusive practices in the engineering curriculum which preparesneurodiverse students to achieve their full potential in the workforce. This work-in-progresspaper seeks to capitalize on the unique strengths of marginalized neurodiverse engineeringstudents. In this study, the innovation self-efficacy of engineering students who self-identify asneurodiverse is explored before and after a curricular intervention, which has been shown tohave the potential to enhance innovation self-efficacy, in an environmental engineering targetcourse. A previously validated Likert-type survey was used, which included the Very BriefInnovation Self-Efficacy scale, the Innovation Interests scale, and the Career Goals: InnovativeWork scale. Among the 47
motivational aspects might also be crucial determinants for determining theperformance and perseverance of engineering students [3].Many engineering students in Bangladesh are primarily motivated by their own aspirations.Increased self-efficacy is mainly congruent with the idea of greater ambition. When studentsbelieve in their ability to complete a particular activity or objective, they are driven to act inways that increase the likelihood of success [1]. Often, students are motivated to succeed inengineering by their passion and attitude [11]. In addition, a solid foundation in disciplines suchas mathematics, physics, and science inspires students to pursue higher education in engineeringto pursue a career in various sophisticated and intriguing
participant who did not submit a post-survey. Figure 4. Pre/Post Survey Results for Career InterestsThe results seen in Figure 5 below display the answers to the second Likert Scale question in thepre- and post-surveys that asked students about their outlook on the limitations and career desiresassociated with pursuing a degree in aerospace engineering. This data reveals that the hydrofoilboat activity did not significantly change students’ perspectives on if an aerospace engineer’sintended career pursuit lies within the aeronautics/space sectors (red bar). However, the datareveals a shift from 32.5% (pre-survey) to 51±3% (post-survey) of students that agreed thataerospace engineering is more limiting than other engineering fields
. He has also con- ducted a Faculty in Residency at Google during the summer of 2018 to learn more about this company’s culture, practices, and to understand the expectations for candidates (e.g. aspiring CS majors) who pursue career opportunities at this company and related prominent companies in tech.Abigail DinaMariah McMichaelTheodore Wimberly Jr.Lauren Brown Lauren Brown is a Morgan State University Research Assistant majoring in Computer Science.Krystal L. Williams, University of Georgia ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Exposing Early CS Majors to Technical Interview Practices in the Form of Group-Based Whiteboard Problem Solving ActivitiesAbstract:Upon degree
trainingand real-world applications. While students have learned the necessary technical skills in college,they may not have had the opportunity to apply the body of knowledge in a practical setting.Addressing this challenge generally requires colleges offering S/G programs to incorporateproject-based learning opportunities into their curricula. Such opportunities provide studentswith hands-on experience and help develop their critical thinking and problem-solving skills thatare essential for a successful career in today’s evolving geospatial industry.2. LiDAR Point CloudsA point cloud is essentially a huge collection of individual points in 3D space. Each point in thecloud corresponds to a specific location, and may also include additional
also explains the career placement, student retention, and community collegetransfer rates.Project ActivitiesThis NSF-funded project was initially planned for three years but was extended to four years dueto the COVID situation. The project includes five major activities as listed in Table 1. In thesubsequent sections, these activities and the project evaluation plan will be explained in detail. Table 1. Project activities. Activity Description (i) Design, develop, and offer the new course and laboratory (renewable energy) (ii) Summer K-12 workshops through the CPCP at NJIT (iii) Faculty development workshops for the instructors of other 2- and 4
the quality of institutional management, additional factors have been found thatinfluence students' academic performance in STEM degree programs. For example, Russell& Zafonte [5] report that first-year students have valuable skills that enable them to succeedin their careers, such as critical thinking. Nevertheless, this study argues that studentsconsider writing skills and collaborative work less important for their career development.Regarding those mentioned above, it has been widely documented that university studentsrequire a broad set of skills to be successful in their careers. For example, it has been shownthat collaborative work helps students to promote conceptual learning, developcommunication skills, foster interdependence
mixes technical skills, undergraduate research, professional development, personaldevelopment, team projects, and career advising. The stakes are low, the group is small (20STEM students), and almost all activities are performed within the scheduled class time. Theintent is to bring these students together to increase all aspects of engagement and make themmore successful in school and eventually in a STEM career. The engagement data collected canthen be analyzed to determine which, if any, aspects of engagement are good predictors ofretention and graduation. Once we develop a reliable way to track changes in studentengagement levels and understand how those levels relate to success, we can use thatinformation to design more impactful early
? Experimental Findings on Factors Driving Faculty Perceptions of Tenure Candidates in STEMIntroductionHiring, academic reviews, and tenure and promotion (T&P) are the most importantcheckpoints along the academic career path in STEM. The hiring process shapes the sub-field and demographic composition of academia, while annual reviews dictate advancementto promotion, awards, and salary. Tenure is a particularly high-stakes juncture, as it sets upa decades-long relationship with faculty colleagues, and grants life-long job security whilealso conferring a badge of honor and legitimacy in the global scientific community. Whatdetermines whether or not a scholar passes through these critical academic checkpoints?Evaluation by
theory, optimal control, network control, and mathematical foundation of deep learning. He hasalso applied research to UAV systems, power generation systems, electric vehicles, and marine vehicles.Dr. Qian is a recipient of 2003 U.S. National Science Foundation (NSF) CAREER Award and one of theinaugural recipients of the University of Texas System Regents’ Outstanding Teaching Award in 2009.He received the 3rd Best Paper Award in the ISA (International Society of Automation) Power IndustryDivision Symposium (2011) and the Best Poster Paper Award in the 3rd IFAC International Conferenceon Intelligent Control and Automation Science (2013). He currently serves as an Associate Editor forAutomatica and International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear
for funding by NSF. He has also con- ducted a Faculty in Residency at Google during the summer of 2018 to learn more about this company’s culture, practices, and to understand the expectations for candidates (e.g. aspiring CS majors) who pursue career opportunities at this company and related prominent companies in tech.Theodore Wimberly Jr.Mariah McMichaelMiss Lauren Brown, Morgan State University Lauren Brown is a Morgan State University Research Assistant majoring in Computer Science.Abigail DinaKrystal L. Williams, University of Georgia ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023Examining Psychological and Social Factors that Impact the Experiences and Representation of Black Women in
Paper ID #37333Work in Progress: Exploring the Use of Faculty and Peer Mentoring as aTool to Support Engineering Transfer Students’ TransitionDr. Anna-Lena Dicke, University of California, Irvine Dr. Dicke is an Associate Project Scientist within the School of Education at the University of California, Irvine. In her research, she aims to understand how students’ motivation and interest in the STEM fields can be fostered to secure their educational persistence and long-term career success. Trying to bridge the gap between theory and practice, she is currently involved in an NSF-funded project aimed at fostering the
students to potential career paths throughcourse content and guest lectures related to sustainability inengineering. Each semester of the course has featuredseveral invited guests from academia and industry to sharetheir work and how it relates to the SDGs (Table 2), aswell as sharing their personal experiences and perspectives.The after-course survey inquired about the impacts of thecourse and the guest lectures on future career andeducational pursuits. 77% of respondents expressedinterested in furthering their education in sustainable Figure 6: Guest lectures andengineering, and 71% want to incorporate sustainable course content increased interestengineering in their future career. Overall, the course in careers