American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) has also proposed a set of coreprinciples stipulating that engineering learning may be considered three dimensional with a focuson engineering habits of mind (e.g., creativity, iteration, collaboration), engineering practices(design, optimization, constraint assessment), and engineering knowledge (principles, problemsolving, and technological outputs) [5]. This approach diverges from the way STEM hastypically been taught in U.S. middle schools, where science and engineering principles are rarelyanchored in relevant phenomena [6]. Since teachers often assume the main responsibility forimplementing engineering tasks in their classrooms to comply with the widespread focus onSTEM integration, they may
capstone project.ConclusionAs a capstone project, we successfully designed and implemented an 8-bit CPU using the DE2FPGA board. The CPU has 16 operations in its instruction set, each defined by a 4-bit opcode.With the use of VHDL code, we were able to realize the arithmetic functions of the ALU-CU ata higher level, bypassing the need for circuit-level design. We tested all the operations in theinstruction set and verified the results through the use of the 7-segment displays and LEDs on theDE2 board.References[1] Ronald Hayne, “An instructional processor design using VHDL and an FPGA”, Proceedingsof 118th ASEE Annual Conference, Vancouver, BC, Canada, June 26 - 29, 2011.[2] Karim Salman, Michael Anderton, “5-step design methodology for a general
Society of Engineering Education (ASEE) Peer Document Repositorydatabase, and (3) the ProQuest Education Database. We started our literature search using thesearch query (recruit* OR college choice AND Black or minorit* AND undergraduate studentsor college students AND engineer*) or near equivalent queries. We used the asterisk wildcard (*)on recruit*, minorit* and engineer* to pick up words like “recruitment” or “recruiting,”“minority” or “minoritized,” and “engineers” or “engineering”. It quickly became apparent thatmany peer-reviewed sources with the content we needed were under the keyphrase of“broadening participation in engineering,” and so we chose to include that search term as well,but still only selected articles that focused
Paper ID #39253Making Electric Machinery Labs Easier to GradeDr. Glenn T. Wrate P.E., Northern Michigan University Dr. Wrate returned to his boyhood home and began teaching at Northern Michigan University in 2014. He was promoted to full professor in 2016 and tenured in 2018. He is a member of HKN and IEEE and is a past chair of the Energy Conversion and Conservation Division of ASEE ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Making Electric Machinery Labs Easier to GradeAbstractThe best way to teach electric machinery is with hands-on labs. At the beginning of the Fall2020 semester
. 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2017.08.018.[6] L. C. O. Tiong and H. J. Lee, “E-cheating Prevention Measures: Detection of Cheating at Online Examinations Using Deep Learning Approach -- A Case Study.” arXiv, Jan. 24, 2021. Accessed: Feb. 10, 2023. [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/2101.09841[7] M. Knight and R. Cooper, “Taking on a New Grading System: The Interconnected Effects of Standards-Based Grading on Teaching, Learning, Assessment, and Student Behavior,” NASSP Bull., vol. 103, no. 1, pp. 65–92, Mar. 2019, doi: 10.1177/0192636519826709.[8] J. Acosta and M. A. Guerra, “Validating Guerra’s Blended Flexible Learning framework for Engineering Courses,” in 2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2022.[9] H
students. We will also presentour most recent findings since ASEE 2022 based on our ongoing research.AcknowledgementsThis research was supported by the National Science Foundation, ”Collaborative Research:Fostering Engineering Creativity and Communication through Immediate, Personalized Feedbackon 2D-Perspective Drawing”: 2013612 (Texas A&M University), 2013504 (Georgia Institute ofTechnology), 2013575 (San Jose State University) and 2013554 (Purdue University). Anyopinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those ofthe authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.References [1] D. P. McCrum, “Evaluation of creative problem-solving abilities in undergraduate
, “Product Design and Development,” 7th ed.; McGraw-Hill: Hightstown, NJ, USA, 2020.[10] J. S. Gero, and J. Milovanovic, “A framework for studying design thinking through measuring designers’ minds, bodies and brains,” Design Science, vol. 6, e19, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1017/dsj.2020.15 4[11] U. Kannengiesser, and J. S. Gero, “Design thinking fast and slow: a framework for Kahneman’s dual-system theory in design,” Design Science, vol. 5. e10, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1017/dsj.2019.9[12] J. Alcaide-Marzal, J. A. Diego-Mas, and G. Acosta-Zazueta, “A 3D shape generative method for aesthetic product design,” Design Studies, vol. 66, pp. 144–176, 2020. https
., Katz, J., Wandersman, A., Skiles, B., Schillaci, M. J., Timmerman, B. E. and Mousseau, T. A. (2013). Exploring the role of sense of community in the undergraduate transfer student experience. Journal of Community Psychology, 41: 277- 290. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcop.21529[3] Walters, N., DeSalvo, A., & Shafer, S. 2017. Intervention for College Attendance Program: 2015-2016 Report. Minnesota Office of Higher Education. Retrieved from https://www.ohe.state.mn.us/pdf/ICAP_Report_15-16.pdf. on March 10, 2021.[4] Smith, B. 2013. Mentoring At-Risk Students through the Hidden Curriculum of Higher Education; Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.[5] Polmear, M., Bielefeldt, A., Knight, D., Swan, C., Canney, N., 2019
/1-27/9. Accessed: Jan. 27, 2022.[8] D. A. Martin, E. Conlon, and B. Bowe, “The role of role-play in student awareness of the social dimension of the engineering profession,” European Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 44, no. 6, pp. 882–905, Nov. 2019, doi: 10.1080/03043797.2019.1624691.[9] J. E. Lewis and D. Wheatley, “Using a Mock Hearing to Engage Students in Critical Thinking,” presented at the 2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Jun. 2011, p. 22.1602.1-22.1602.13. Accessed: Jan. 21, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/using-a-mock-hearing-to-engage-students-in-critical-thinking[10] J. L. Carlson and N. T. Skaggs, “Learning by Trial and Error: A Case for Moot Courts,” Journal of
identity,development and socialization, especially among underrepresented minorities and women. Wehave also aimed to identify key characteristics of academic or non-academic spaces, structuredby the program, that foster STEM identity development.References[1] U. Ghosh-Dastidar, D. Samaroo, A. Solis, and S. Han, “S-STEM: An Educational Model for Retention at an Urban Institution,” 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2018.[2] Institutional Description [Online] Available: https://facultycommons.citytech.cuny.edu/sponsored-programs/institutional-description/ . [Accessed: 28 Feb. 2023].[3] U.S. News and World Report [Online] Available: https://www.usnews.com/best- colleges/cuny-tech-2696 [Accessed 28 Feb
continueadopting academic and community partnerships as an effective student learning model. 6References [1] A. Dominguez, H. Alarcon, and F. Garc´ıa-Pe˜nalvo, “Active Learning Experiences in Engineering Education,” 2019. [2] M. Prince, “Does Active Learning Work? a Review of the Research,” Journal of engineering education, vol. 93, no. 3, pp. 223–231, 2004. [3] A. Shekar, “Project-Based Learning in Engineering Design Education: Sharing Best Practices,” in 2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2014, pp. 24–1016. [4] M. L. Fioravanti and et.al, “Integrating Project Based Learning and Project Management for Software Engineering Teaching: An Experience Report,” in Proceedings of the
. J. Eng. Educ. 111, 2 (April 2022), 357–375. [2] Jill Davishahl and Sura Alqudah. 2020. Investigation of sense of belonging to engineering in introductory-level pre-engineering classes. In 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access Proceedings (Virtual On line). ASEE Conferences. [3] E.L. Deci, H. Eghrari, B.C. Patrick, and D. Leone. 1994. Facilitating internalization: The self determination theory perspective. Journal of Personality 62 (1994), 119–142. [4] E.L. Deci and R.M. Ryan. 2012. Self-determination theory. In Handbook of theories of social psychology, P.A.M. van Lange, A.W. Kruglanski, and E.T. Higgins (Eds.). Sage Publications Ltd., 416–436. [5] C.S. Dweck. 2006. Mindset: The new psychology of success
Cell/Diesel Generator Energy System for Dubai Ferry," 2019 Advances in Science and Engineering Technology International Conferences (ASET), 2019, pp. 1-5, doi: 10.1109/ICASET.2019.8714292.[10] A. Dicks, "Hydrogen generation from natural gas for the fuel cell systems of tomorrow," Journal of Power Sciences, vol. 61, no. 1-2, pp. 113-124, Apr. 1996, doi: 10.1016/S0378- 7753(96)02347-6.[11] A. Salazar Llinas, E. Ortiz-Rivera, and J. Gonzalez-Llorente, "Dynamic Power Control of a PV-Fuel Cell Hybrid Energy System Used in DC Motors Applications," 2014 IEEE Green Technologies Conference. 49-53. 10.1109/GREENTECH.2014.19.[12] M. Perez, Ph. Rogers, J. Buchert, D. Sullivan, and T. Emami, "Design and Efficiency Analysis of a
," 2010 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), 2010, pp. S3G-1-S3G-6, doi: 10.1109/FIE.2010.5673256. 2. Rahman, F., & Andrews, C., & Wendell, K. B., & Batrouny, N. A., & Dalvi, T. S. (2019, June), Elementary Students Navigating the Demands of Giving Engineering Design Peer Feedback (Fundamental) Paper presented at 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Tampa, Florida. 10.18260/1-2--32699 3. Pintrich, P. R., & De Groot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 33–40. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.82.1.33 4. Pintrich, P. R., Marx, R., & Boyle, R. (1993). Beyond
Covid-19 on Applied MathematicsCourses for Engineering Students. In 2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition.[2] Besser, A. et al. (2020) ‘Adaptability to a sudden transition to online learning during the COVID-19pandemic: Understanding the challenges for students.’, Scholarship of Teaching and Learning inPsychology. doi:10.1037/stl0000198.[3] Faulkner, B., Earl, K. and Herman, G. (2019) ‘Mathematical Maturity for Engineering Students’,International Journal of Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education, 5(1), pp. 97–128.doi:10.1007/s40753-019-00083-8.[4] Jamalpur, B. et al. (2021) ‘A comprehensive overview of online education – Impact on engineeringstudents during COVID-19’, Materials Today: Proceedings. doi:10.1016/j.matpr.2021.01.749
, “Transgender and Gender Nonconforming Undergraduate Engineering Students: Perspectives, Resiliency, and Suggestions for Improving Engineering Education.” Ph.D. thesis, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, 2021.[3] S. James, J. Herman, S. Rankin, M. Keisling, L. Mottet, and M. Anafi, “The Report of the 2015 U.S. Transgender Survey,” National Center for Transgender Equality, 2016.[4] G. Beemyn, “Campus Pride Trans Policy,” Clearinghouse, 2021, Available: www.campuspride.org/tpc[5] R. Figard, M. Dalal, J. Roarty, S. Nieto, and A. Carberry, “Understanding High School Student Experiences in an Engineering Course Designed For All (Fundamental, Diversity),” In Proc. ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2022
faculty mentors, and develop more effective techniques for faculty mentoring.References1. M. Klawe, “Why We Need More STEM Students to Study Abroad,” Forbes, Mar 6, 2019. [Online]. https://www.forbes.com. [Accessed February 21, 2023].2. R. Jones and B. Oberst, International Experience for Engineering Students through Distance Learning Techniques. ASEE 2000 Annual Conference Session 2360. 2000.3. ABET Criterion. https://www.abet.org/accrediation. [Accessed February 15, 2023].4. S. Gerras et al. Strategic Leadership Primer. Army War College, Carlisle Barracks PA, 2010.5. J. Schreiner and G. Dixon. The Engineering Management Handbook 3rd Edition, Chapter 1 The Engineering Management Profession. The American Society for Engineering Management
and co-Director of the Youth Engineering Solutions (YES) Middle School project focusing on engineering and computational thinking. Dr. Klein-Gardner is a Fellow of ASEE. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 High School Administrator’s Perspectives on an Engineering Program Aimed at Broadening Participation (Fundamental)AbstractThis work explores the experiences of administrators supporting teachers in the e4usa programwhich emphasizes broadening participation in engineering at the high school level to exploreefforts to broaden participation that leverage multiple levels of the school system. Two rounds ofconvenience samples of administrators in public and independent schools
Classroom in the Online Environment of Covid? Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 2022. 30(2): p. 517-531.5. Morgan, J., E. Lindsay, C. Howlin, and M. Bogaard, Pathways of Students' Progress through an on-Demand Online Curriculum, in ASEE Conference and Exposition. 2019: Tampa, FL.6. Tsai, Y.-S., D. Rates, P.M. Moreno-Marcos, P.J. Muñoz-Merino, I. Jivet, M. Scheffel, H. Drachsler, C.D. Kloos, and D. Gašević, Learning Analytics in European Higher Education—Trends and Barriers. Computers & Education, 2020. 155: p. 103933.7. Mavroudi, A., M. Giannakos, and J. Krogstie, Supporting Adaptive Learning Pathways through the Use of Learning Analytics: Developments, Challenges and Future
.1742-1241.2011.02659.x.[8] S. M. Van Anders, “Why the academic pipeline leaks: Fewer men than women perceive barriers to becoming professors,” Sex Roles, vol. 51, no. 9–10, pp. 511–521, Nov. 2004, doi: 10.1007/S11199-004-5461-9/METRICS.[9] R. Ysseldyk et al., “A leak in the academic pipeline: Identity and health among postdoctoral women,” Front. Psychol., vol. 10, no. JUN, p. 1297, Jun. 2019, doi: 10.3389/FPSYG.2019.01297/BIBTEX.[10] N. D. Jackson, K. I. Tyler, Y. Li, W. T. Chen, C. Liu, and R. Bhargava, “Keeping current: An update on the structure and evaluation of a program for graduate women interested in engineering Academia,” in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings
technique that is not often applied in a person-centered manner (Godwin et al.,2021). PCA is one of the most frequently used dimension reduction methods, which aims toidentify a subset of variables to represent a dataset in a lower dimension without losingsignificant information (Kherif & Latypova, 2020). In this example, Martin & Sorhaindo (2019)compared intrinsic and extrinsic motivational factors as predictors of academic achievement forcivil engineering students. They employed PCA to consolidate motivational factors into intrinsicand extrinsic groups. The original twenty-two motivation variables were ultimately grouped intofive principal components, which accounted for 66% percent of the variance. Thisimplementation of PCA to aggregate
-doctoral fellowship at Lawrence National Laboratory focusing on com- putational analysis for nonlinear seismic analysis of Department of Energy nuclear facilities and systems. After joining SFSU in 2016, she established an active research lab at SFSU with a diverse group of under- graduate and Master’s level students. For her engineering education research, she is interested in exploring how to use technology such as virtual reality and 3D printing to enhance student engagement. She is an active member of ASCE, ASEE, and SEAONC.Shah Rukh Humayoun, San Francisco State UniversityKhanh NguyenYongjian Pan ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Reinforcing Human-Technology Interaction Theory
to use the notebook combined with Python, while the second class will be applying the traditional approach. This stage is not yet done as this is still a work in progress. Nevertheless, the plan is to introduce this new approach next year when the kinetics and reactor design course is offered.Presenting this research at the 2023 ASEE annual conference, while it is still at the progressstage, enables us to interact with other instructors who have done something similar to shareexperiences and to develop our structured assessment for next year’s intervention. In principle,the proposed intervention can be implemented in other engineering courses that have a similarteaching challenge and require a computational approach. Following the
review of empirical studies,” Computers & Education, vol. 148, Apr., 2020.[9] Computer Science Teachers Association, “Code.org Advocacy Coalition & Expanding Computing Education Pathways Alliance,” 2019 State of Computer Science Education. Available: https://advocacy.code.org/. [Accessed Dec. 14, 2020][10] J. Margolis, R. Estrella, J. Goode, J. Holme, and K. Nao, Stuck in the Shallow End: Education, Race, and Computing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2017.[11] J. Margolis, J. and A. Fisher, A. Unlocking the Clubhouse: Women in Computing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2002.[12] V. Barr and C. Stephenson, “Bringing computational thinking to K-12: What is involved and what is the role of the computer
to 27high-enrolment courses. In a previous work-in-progress ASEE paper we described the PAC andan evaluation of the WTA carried out for a single course (Piña et al. 2021). In this paper, we givean overview of the TW, the PAC, and the PM; furthermore we provide statistics and a generaldescription of the interactions between WTAs and students.We identify three advantages of our approach. First, the proactiveness of the WTAs is veryappreciated by students even in cases where no actions are triggered as a result ofcommunication. Second, WTAs document cases, which helps professors of the same course tomake consistent flexibilizations through time. Third, since WTAs are coordinated at a schoollevel, lessons learned in specific courses are shared
-2-- 30982.[7] J. Wierer, “Standards-based grading for signals and systems,” in Proc. ASEE Annu. Conf. Expo., Tampa, FL, June 2019, pp. 1-12, doi: 10.18260/1-2--33282.[8] S. A. Atwood, M. T. Siniawski, and A. R. Carberry, “Using standards-based grading to effectively assess project-based design courses,” in Proc. ASEE Annu. Conf. Expo., Indianapolis, IN, June 15-18, 2014, pp. 1-10, doi: 10.18260/1-2--23278[9] M. Price, K. Handley, J. Millar, and B. O’Donovan, “Feedback: all that effort, but what is the effect?,” Assess. Eval. High. Educ., vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 277–289, May 2010, doi: 10.1080/02602930903541007.[10] H. A. Diefes-Dux and H. Ebrahiminejad, “Standards-based grading derived data to
for the Ford Foundation Fellowship Program. Her research interest focuses on changing the deficit base perspective of first-generation college students by providing asset-based approaches to understanding this population. Dina is interested in understanding how first-generation college students author their identities as engineers and negotiate their multiple identities in the current culture of engineering. Dina has won several awards including the 2022-2023 Outstanding Research Pub- lication Award by the American Educational Research Association (AERA) Division I, 2018 ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference Best Diversity Paper Award, 2019 College of Engineering Outstanding Graduate Student Research Award
Home-based, Hands-on Lab Activities to Effectively Engage STEM Students During a Pandemic,” in 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access Proceedings, Virtual Conference: ASEE Conferences, Jul. 2021, p. 36744. doi: 10.18260/1-2--36744.[4] J. “Kemi” Ladeji-Osias et al., “Initial Impact of an Experiment-centric Teaching Approach in Several STEM Disciplines,” in 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access Proceedings, Virtual On line: ASEE Conferences, Jun. 2020, p. 34829. doi: 10.18260/1-2-- 34829.[5] S. Ikiriko, A. Wemida, S. Efe, M. Shokouhian, O. Owolabi, and J. K. Ladeji-Osias, “Home- based Cantilever Beam Experiment for Civil Engineering Undergraduate Students,” ASEE Virtual Annual Conference
assistant for the Virginia Tech Disaster Resilience and Risk Management interdisciplinary graduate program, as well as for the VT Center for Refugee, Migrant, and Displacement Studies.Hannah Wilkinson, Utah State University Hannah Wilkinson is a graduate student in Engineering Education at Utah State University. She received a B.S. in Chemical Engineering in from the University of Utah. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 A Panel Envisioning Gender Equity in Engineering for the Next 130 Years:Perspectives from Graduate Students and Postdoctoral Researchers in WIEDAbstractIn celebration of 130 years of the American Society of Engineering Education (ASEE), the Womenin Engineering Division
been recognized as a Diggs Teaching Scholar, a Graduate Academy for Teaching Excellence Fellow, a Global Perspectives Fellow, a Diversity Scholar, a Fulbright Scholar, a recipient of the NSF CAREER award, and was inducted into the Bouchet Honor Society. Homero serves as the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Chair for the Commission on Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (CDEI), the Program Chair for the ASEE Faculty Development Division, and the Vice Chair for the Research in Engineering Education Network (REEN). ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Comparison of student global perspectives pre and post-COVID for a study abroad