. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Influences on Displaced Engineering Student Professional Identity Development: A Scoping Literature Review Across Forced Migration ContextsIntroductionDisplaced students, forcibly uprooted because of major traumas like civil unrest, poverty, andrelated disasters, are unafforded opportunities to pursue engineering at alarming rates [1][2]. Forexample, as of 2022 only 5% of refugee students attended college compared to a 41% globalaverage. Additionally, despite increasing displacement rates from climate change and unrest,fragile contexts’ demands for engineering, and the known challenges of identity development inmigration, disparities in engineering are
. The Graduate RecordExamination (GRE), administered by the Educational Testing Service (ETS), is a widely usedstandardized test and is often required or requested for admission into graduate-level programs inthe United States.The research questions addressed in this study are: 1. How do faculty members perceive the importance of the GRE for admission to MS Thesis and Doctoral programs? 2. How do faculty members' perceptions of the GRE differ across faculty groups (Tenure, discipline, race, ethnicity, gender)?The GRE aims to measure an individual's verbal reasoning, quantitative reasoning, and analyticalwriting abilities and comprises three sections offered in computer-based centers all year round
andinfrastructure. An even more integrated approach, BIMM, can support more efficient andeffective building operation and maintenance while it is in use, although the terms are often usedinterchangeably. BIM and BIMM can potentially improve project efficiency, reduce constructionwaste, and improve collaboration and communication among stakeholders [1]. Although manylarge companies in the Architecture, Engineering and Construction (AEC) industry are usingBIM to streamline their work, BIM tools and practices are not yet well-infused across the sector.Many small firms lack the resources and/or capabilities to use BIM effectively. Small toMedium-sized Enterprises (SMEs) face many barriers concerning legal context, attitude andmarket perceptions, education
Learning in Community Colleges and Four-Year UniversitiesIntroduction Community colleges serve an important role in the development of students in science,technology, engineering, and math (STEM) fields. Most community colleges are open-accessinstitutions, with students coming from all different walks of life to enroll in these schools [1].These include students directly out of high-school, or those that are returning to school for asecond career. When looking that the demographics of community colleges, we find that theyserve a disproportionate number of students who are marginalized [2]. These institutions oftenare a gateway to transferring into a four-year school where a student can continue their educationand receive a bachelor’s
-efficacy of undergraduate environmentalengineering students is explored in a target course before and after a curricular interventionwhich has been shown to have the potential to enhance innovation self-efficacy. A design mentorand an education mentor outside of the course supported the students through their engineeringdesign process. During the start and end of this curricular intervention, a survey consisting of theVery Brief Innovation Self-Efficacy scale (ISE.5), the Innovation Interests scale (INI), and theCareer Goals: Innovative Work scale (CGIW) was administered to measure students’ shift in: 1)Innovation Self-Efficacy, 2) Innovation Interests, and 3) Innovative Work. Formal feedback fromthe mentors was utilized in interpreting the survey
make military engineers at all ranks valuable candidates for humanitarian, peace, ordevelopment focused engineering programs.IntroductionCombat is not the only form of military engagement. In 2022, the Congressional ResearchService reported 471 deployments since 1798 with 11 formal declarations of war [1]. These factsconfirm that 98% of U.S military engagements are for operations other than war. The 460 otherengagements involved engaging military partners and allies through military training,peacekeeping, humanitarian assistance, and disaster management or response. Theseexperiences give military engineers insight to the challenges that global communities face andthat are addressed through some type of construction project in a community. Some
in the 21st century thanin the preceding timeframes. Engineering technology and the requirements from the globalworkforce are in constant evolution. This behooves engineering programs at universities acrossthe world to adapt their curricula to prepare the graduates for the challenges in the engineeringindustry. The engineering curriculum which adopts integrated projects on a centralizedengineering project platform [1] enables the student to become an active, intentional, and goal-oriented learner through problem-solving [2]-[3] in a project-based [4]-[6] and project-enhancedlearning [7] environment. Traditionally, core lecture and laboratory courses have been taught inrelative isolation of each other. This approach does not effectively
technology students enrolled in the Principles ofMechanical Systems course participated in this study, and were tasked with the design of avehicle that would solve overcrowdedness in urban areas in the next century. Focus of theresearch was on innovative bio-inspired design that is backed by scientific evidence and the useof arts to convey the design. The students then expressed their opinions on their design projectusing a photovoice reflection of their learning. Student responses to the photovoice reflectionprompts related to the design were qualitatively categorized under three themes: 1)demonstrating the importance of entrepreneurial thinking from the end user’s perspective 2)stressing the importance of teamwork and communication and 3) using
Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, Instagram, etc. [1]. Recent research hasdemonstrated how to use network science concepts and data-driven methodologies to quantifysocial influences in social media [2]. Due to the ease and ubiquity of Social Media tools and easeof accessibility via a laptop, smartphone, or tablet, an increasing number of students are usingthem [3]. Students can interact with current and previous peers through social media, which alsomakes it easier to access emotional support and suggests creative activities [4]. This is crucialbecause, for minority students, making connections is one of the essential components of afulfilling academic experience. Due to communication barriers or other reasons, minoritystudents are typically less
students [1]. Studies have shown that the adoptionof OER materials provides significant cost savings without sacrificing academic outcomes [2,3],and that students appreciate the variety and ease of access of the resources [4]. Additionally, OERsallow for more interactivity as well as having a smaller impact on the environment, reducing paperwaste [5]. Lastly, OERs were shown to have more positive impact on historically underservedstudents, international students, and low-income students [3,6].At the University of Prince Edward Island, an informal survey by the Student Union from Fall2022 showed that 94% of the nearly 600 students would use an OER if it were available, with 69%of surveyed students rating the quality as a good or very good
only be counted in this field and not any of the race categories [1].Yet according to the National Science Foundation, “underrepresented minorities are defined to be“three racial or ethnic minority groups (Black or African Americans, Hispanics or Latinos, andAmerican Indians or Alaska Natives) whose representation in [science and engineering]education or employment is smaller than their representation in the US population” [2].However, in all cases, the multiracial category is lumped into an “Other” category, whichtypically includes American Indian/Alaska Native, two or more races, and nonresident aliens. Itis also interesting to note that the US Department of Education includes Native Hawaiian andPacific Islanders in the Aisan
rely on the growth of technology to improve their researchcapabilities and further their findings within studies. Qualitative research fields, specifically, havebenefitted from growing technology, especially relating data collection (e.g. audio/visualrecordings, transcription services) and analysis (e.g. statistical software packages, word processingtechnology) [1]. However, an area that is underutilized by qualitative researchers is artificialintelligence (AI). AI and its sub-fields present a space for qualitative researchers to build uponexisting research to enhance future studies through computational methods and modeling. In thispaper we will focus on the potential for agent-based modeling (ABM), one such sub-field of AI,to contribute to
peer-reviewed journal articles and conference proceedings and served as a journal reviewer in engineering education, STEM education, and educational psychology. She has also served as a co-PI, an external evaluator, or an advisory board member on several NSF-funded projects.Dr. Cedrick Kwuimy, University of Cincinnati Dr. Kwuimy is currently an Assistant Professor - Educator in the Department of Engineering & COmput- ing Education - CEAS at the University of Cincinnati. He graduated from the University of Yaounde 1 in Cameroon with a focus on applied nonlinear dynamics and applied physics. Prior to joining the Univer- sity of Cincinnati, Dr. Kwuimy was Research Fellow at the African Institute for Mathematical
significantmilestone occurred in 1997, when the national accrediting board for engineering programs, ABET(Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology) created the Engineering Criteria 2000 (EC2000). These criteria, which have continued to evolve over the last 20+ years, documented specificlearning outcomes required of engineering educational programs to remain accredited, one of thetwo pathways for engineering graduates to pursue a Professional Engineering (PE) license [1 –3].The ABET Engineering Criteria required that future engineers demonstrate proficiencies inmultidisciplinary teams, engineering in a global context and an understanding of contemporaryissues [2], among other technical skills. This “a-k” (updated to 1-7 in 2019) criteria became
. However, these topics can be learnedthrough effective implementation of laboratory exercises with physical models instrumented tomeasure time-dependent forcing and response [1]. Laboratories are a particularly effectiveenvironment for students to learn structural dynamics concepts and methods of analysis [2]. Richlaboratory experiences are increasingly possible thanks to low-cost computing and controlplatforms like Raspberry-Pi and Arduino [3] but are even more accessible with phone-basedsensors and tailored apps [4,5].Most structural dynamics textbooks [6,7] follow a straightforward progression of topics,focusing on single-degree-of-freedom (SDOF) systems first, then exploring various forcings,well-described continuous systems, and finally multi
Lozada-Medellin1, Ivonne Santiago2, Yuanrui Sang31 Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, University of Texas at El Paso2 Department of Civil Engineering, University of Texas at El Paso3 Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Texas at El PasoKeywords: Equity, Inclusion, Electric Vehicles (EVs), EVs Charging Stations, ElectrifiedRoadways, Transportation Infrastructure 1. AbstractAs the transportation and the automotive industries continue to grow, the impacts on theenvironment and human health remain a growing concern on the general public and policy-makers[6], [9]. Although Electric Vehicles (EVs) are entering the market as a green technology solutionto
assignedproblem sets successfully while expressing positive perceptions, and adequate levels of comfortduring these experiences. However, they also showed adequate levels of anxiety.1. IntroductionEffectively preparing computer science (CS) majors to become proficient practitioners in thefield is a challenge. CS is considered a field with one of the fastest growing career paths in theworld [28]. Yet, the supply of candidates needed to meet the demands of such growth isrelatively low.Research surrounding CS majors and how to appropriately prepare them for success has garneredmuch attention [2-3, 10, 14 18, 21, 29]. Yet, student success that is primarily contingent uponfeeding the CS pipeline with new majors, and encouraging their matriculation through a
Scientists (SPSS 25.0). Thisresearch carefully investigated the gender differences in students’ motivation and learning at a95% confidence level.Keywords: Experiment-centric pedagogy, critical thinking, student motivation, student learning,COPUS (Classroom Observation Protocol for Undergraduate), STEM (Science, Technology,Engineering, and Mathematics).INTRODUCTIONIn recent years, the existing educational system has been increasingly criticized for its inability tofoster students’ learning and motivation. The Traditional pedagogy, which involves heavylecturing with little or no student participation and expecting them to retain a lot of material, is nolonger an effective method of instruction [1].To increase student learning and motivation
development. Our institution, a private multi-campus Mexican university, faces these challenges by migrating the traditional, lecture-basededucational model to a challenge-based learning methodology emphasizing competencydevelopment instead of content knowledge acquisition [1]. Under the new educational model, thecurricular structure of undergraduate programs consists of three phases: exploration, focus, andspecialization. While in the exploration phase (the first two or three semesters), academicprograms in the same area have a core curriculum. This means that the programs related to theSchool of Engineering and Sciences share the same curriculum for the first three semesters,allowing students to shift smoothly from one area to another.All the
performancewas tested by forcing water at two different pressures through the devices, and the time to drainvolume was measured. Finally, the entire water was completely drained through the devices,proving the successful fabrication of the devices.IntroductionTechnical ConceptMicrofluidics has been on the rise since the introduction of the field in the 1960s; however, theproduction was not the most available or optimized at the time. Some of the first and mostsuccessful microfluidic devices were created to advance Inkjet printing in the 1990s [1].Currently, microfluidic devices are being implemented within many fields, notably the medical,research, and fuel cell fields. The medical field has begun using microfluidics in applicationssuch as microfluidic
studytime solving textbook problems [1, 2]. In undergraduate engineering courses, most of thesetextbook problems (and course assessments designed by instructors to include these textbookproblems either verbatim or a variation of these problems) are designed to evaluate the ability ofstudents to recall facts and basic concepts, and apply these concepts in various contexts to solvenumerical problems (Please refer to Tables A.1 and A.2 for sample questions). Students mightdevelop problem-solving skills, partially through pattern-based recognition, by completing theseassignments and also be able to achieve good grades in the course. However, these grades (andoverall GPAs) are often not an accurate reflection of their understanding of
to the rubric in Table 1 and was included as 10% of the overall course grade.Table 1: Rubric for grading homework chat participation. 0 points Student did not participate in the homework chat. Student showed up for the chat but was unprepared and 5 points unable to demonstrate understanding of the material. Student had some elements of the solution correct but had 7 points some significant misunderstanding of fundamental concepts. Student had the majority of the solution correct. They 9 points needed some prompting, but they were able to verbalize
researchers can disrupt the chilly, heteronormativeculture of STEM by modeling inclusive classroom and lab practices. Additionally, we offerinsights on how students negotiate their identity visibility in a chilly, heteronormative, and silentculture. Introduction Despite efforts to increase diversity and inclusion on college and university campuses,Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) programs continue to be largelycisgender, male, heterosexual, and white [1]–[3]This continued lack of diversity is largely due tothe heteronormative, racist, and sexist culture that serves to make STEM spaces inhospitable formarginalized students, and results in high levels of attrition for these groups [1], [4]. In order toaddress this, we
for DASA Aerospace in Wedel, Germany 1993. His initial research also made a major contribution to the M1A1 barrel reshape initiative that began in 1995. Shortly afterwards he was selected for a 1 year appointment to the United States Military Academy West Point where he taught Mathematics. Following these accomplishments he worked on the SADARM fire and forget projectile that was finally used in the second gulf war. Since that time, circa 2002, his studies have focused on unmanned systems both air and ground. His team deployed a bomb finding robot named the LynchBot to Iraq late in 2004 and then again in 2006 deployed about a dozen more improved LynchBots to Iraq. His team also assisted in the deployment of 84
racism on campuses as recently as September 2021where an anonymous racist letter was emailed to the student chapter of the National Society ofBlack Engineers (NSBE) (and subsequently almost all of the Black/African American students) atthe University of Massachusetts – Amherst [1], [2]. In June 2020, a mixed methods research study was conducted on how underrepresentedengineering students were impacted by COVID-19. The study included 500 participants, withroughly 50% of those participants identified as Black/African American. Participants were askedto respond to the prompt “Imagine you are chatting with a friend or family member about theevolving COVID-19 crisis. Tell them about something you have experienced recently as anengineering
programs, but the current published literature concerning these types ofprograms is lacking [1]. This study analyzes the Integrated Design Engineering (IDE) program atthe University of Colorado Boulder, one such multidisciplinary program. Quantitative surveydata and qualitative focus group data from the students in IDE are obtained and analyzed todetermine the value of these programs, as well as improvements that can be made. The results ofthe surveys and focus groups show that multidisciplinary engineering programs are in factvaluable in recruiting and retaining engineering students. These programs attract students whoare well-rounded, have many interests, are collaborative, and are looking for versatility in futurecareers. The program is able to
necessary, important, and hard to do well.Existing research in engineering education typically has overlooked investigating harm thatteammates enact on each other, and instructors’ understanding of how to teach about teamworkor about their responsibility for providing all students a safe and supportive environment. Thereis ample evidence that teaming experienced by women in undergraduate engineering educationexperience regular and routine marginalization by their teammates, threatening their right tolearn in a safe and supportive environment in ways that their majority teammates don’texperience [1]–[4]. There is much less research on the experience of racially minoritized studentsprecisely because they are so much less represented, yet it is clear
criteria for accrediting engineering and engineering technologyprograms reflect the importance of standards competence for students. Specifically, the 2023-2024 Engineering Accreditation Commission (EAC) criterion 5d states, “The curriculum mustinclude a culminating major engineering design experience that 1) incorporates appropriateengineering standards and multiple constraints, and 2) is based on the knowledge and skillsacquired in earlier course work.” [1] Also, the Engineering Technology AccreditationCommission (ETAC) criterion 3 states student outcomes of “an ability to conduct standard tests,measurements, and experiments and to analyze and interpret the results” (3.A.4) and “an abilityto conduct standard tests, measurements, and experiments
faculty and improvement of curriculum and researchin academic institutes of other member countries.Keywords: Fulbright, Fulbright Scholar Award, Council for the International Exchange of Scholars.INTRODUCTION US Congress in 1946 approved the Fulbright program, which later proved to be a beacon forinternational understanding and collaboration [1]. The Fulbright Scholar Program wasadministered by the Council for International Exchange of Scholars (CIES) a non-profitorganization that was founded in 1947. Later in 1996, the Fulbright Scholar Programadministration transferred to the Institute of International Education (IIE). The Fulbright U.S.Scholar Program offers over 800 awards for US citizens to teach, conduct research and carry
in Science and Engineering for 10 years and is a past President of WEPAN. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Future GR.A.D.S. (GRaduate & Advanced Degree Students); A mentoring program to support undergraduate Hispanic seniors through the graduate school application process.Background/MotivationThe continuous development of the United States economy requires increased participation of itsSTEM workforce. While there is currently a STEM workforce supply shortage in some fieldsand surplus in others, there is consistently a shortage of STEM workforce supply for individualswith graduate degrees in engineering [1]. Hispanic people are a growing demographic in theUnited