what has been done by librarians in the past, so that college anduniversity libraries across the country are better able to plan, implement, and assess potentialoutreach and assistive programs for veterans on their campuses, both residential and virtual.INTRODUCTIONSince World War II, there have been several “G.I. Bills” passed by Congress to provide benefitsfor veterans of America’s wars. The first, officially known as the Servicemen’s ReadjustmentAct of 1944, included low-cost mortgages and loans, a year of unemployment compensation, and(most importantly) dedicated tuition and living expenses for veterans attending college. By 1956,when the act expired, over 2.2 million veterans had successfully used the G.I. Bill to attend thecollege of
Batch of Universities under the “Excellent Engineer Education and Training Program” Outline of National Medium and Long-term Education Reform 12 2010 and Development Plan (2010-2020) The Decision of the State Council on Accelerating the 13 2010 Cultivation and Development of Strategic New Industries Hu Jintao. Report to the Eighteenth National Congress of the Communist Party of China. Steadfastly advance along the road 14 2012 of socialism with Chinese characteristics and strive to build a moderately prosperous society in all aspects 15 2015 Made
workers (division of labor) to collaboratively Figure 2: Example of an engineering activity produce the components of the power grid. They do system in this study this work using specialized tools (computers, plans, knowledge, and skills) according to existing rules(regulations, norms, ‘best practices’) to achieve their objectives and ultimately deliver theoutcome, that is power service to customers (see Figure 2).Data AnalysisThe interviews were transcribed and analyzed using a thematic analysis approach [17], in whichthe data were analyzed to find patterns and themes in the texts. Braun and Clarke formulated athematic analysis process comprised of six general phases: 1
evolution is not without barriers to entry andassociated risks.The objective of this paper is to share the experiences of three established civil engineeringfaculty and their mentor who are within two years of receiving their first NSF grants to supportEER projects at their home institution. Barriers to entry, challenges, and the lessons learnedassociated with their growth as emerging engineering education researchers are discussed.Strategies and resources are provided to assist new engineering educators to: lobby forinstitutional support, secure initial extramural funding, initiate collaborations, formulate short-and long-term career plans, build an Individual Development Plan (IDP), and develop aneffective mentor-mentee relationship with an
. When we formulated the structure of the workshop, wetherefore built the topic of intersectionality into our plans, and attempted to live out thoseprinciples in our design.Workshop GoalsWith this in mind, we sought to bring together experts across a range of computing, engineering,and related technical and data-based disciplines as well as experts from other fields in the socialsciences, including education and the learning sciences, to build an agenda for inclusive policy,practices, and research for TNB computing students. Our specific goals were to: ● Define near- and long-term agenda items for intersectional research about the inclusion of TNB learners in computing for the Computing Education Research (CER) community ● Advance
this competition. An initial investmentpurchased 10 robot kits and a competition field. This outfits a class size of 25 students workingin 5 teams. The first-year implementation cost was approximately $1200 per student and thesecond and third-year cost under $400 per student. With the outbreak of the COVID pandemicand safety restrictions occurring just prior to the first year of implementation, this choice wastimely and allowed the college to provide a capstone project for a full class of students. Facultyhad the ability to control and adapt the project as needed. During the second-year, restrictionseased, and faculty again adapted the project. All students were required to participate as amember of a team. Each team planned, designed, built
course up a level.The teaching pyramid can also be used as part of assessing the teaching center. Are thereprograms that support faculty at each level? Do the programs help faculty or courses move up alevel over time? Are any faculty consistently in the lowest level and how is that beingaddressed? Are there any patterns of courses or classrooms often showing up at the lowest levelsand what support is needed to make changes?In summary, this paper shares a teaching pyramid framework for thinking about teachingimprovements, for planning programming to meet faculty where they are with enable actionablenext steps in moving towards teaching excellence, and for assessing the teaching center.IntroductionThe mission of our teaching center is to improve
onengineering and applied science. In fact, most educators trained in humanities, arts, and socialsciences work in a single department.We planned these activities in response to significant recent interest in pedagogies inflected bySTS for engineering students [1, 2, 3]. Such efforts are often strongly interdisciplinary, crossingboundaries between engineering and humanities fields. There are some signs that engineeringeducation, on the whole, considers interdisciplinary education to be useful for students: evidenceof these considerations include ABET criteria [4], curricular and co-curricular requirements ofengineering degrees, and pedagogical activities in which different disciplinary knowledgessupport the integration of “sociotechnical” themes [5, 6
allow students to give backto the community, such as local volunteering or STEM initiatives for younger students. Stressrelief events were defined as those intending to increase the mental well-being of students, suchas yoga or painting. And finally, general information events were defined as anything outside ofthe defined categories such as financial planning or other specialty topics.We also asked open-ended questions about what students would hope to gain from participatingin a GradWIE group, what types of resources or graduate school information they wish theyknew when they started their degree, and if there was anything else they wanted to share. Thecomplete survey can be found in the Appendix.ParticipantsThis survey was sent to a pre
University with specializa- tion in Construction Management. His research focus is in the area of contract administration on heavy civil projects. His teaching areas include 1. introduction to the built environment and construction man- agement, 2. construction materials and methods, 3. construction equipment, 4. building construction cost estimating, 5. heavy civil construction cost estimating, 6. project planning, scheduling, and control, 7. temporary structures, and 8. contract changes and claims management.Mr. Chris Souder, M.S. Chris Souder graduated with an undergraduate degree in Construction Management in 1988 before going to work for Kiewit Pacific Co. in Northern California. Chris had a successful sixteen year
and schooladministrators when planning TPD [2], [16]. While there is general consensus regarding thenecessary features for effective professional development, proving which individual orcombination of components in producing the largest effect can be elusive. Research indicates themost effective type of teacher professional development (TPD) involves a sustained and ongoingexperience, which is coherent, job-embedded, and involves active participation by the learnerand includes a learning community [2], [3], [4], [5]. However, most teachers continue toparticipate in episodic workshops [3]. Expenses related to TPD is another reason districts areresorting to shorter duration, incremental TPD, as these types of experiences are less expensivethan
our design. The solution to our problem was the addition of a lipon the front of the propeller component that could fit into a gap in the hubcap which kept thepropellers from being pushed off of the axis. Figure 1: The Solidworks assembly of our design.MotorThe motor of our prototype is the “Underwater Thruster 16V 300W Brushless Motor with CW 3-Blade Nylon Propeller for RC Bait Tug Boat Nest Ship Submarine,” which we bought fromAmazon. [22] Another concern to us was waterproofing the electrical parts, so we opted to buy amotor that was already waterproofed. However, after significant testing, we realized that the motor,when used as a generator, did not create as much electricity as we had originally planned.[23
wouldpractice the principles of design for manufacturability (DFM). This paper details a plan for aproject-based course conceived to accomplish exactly this while maintaining a realistic scope interms of safety and available resources. This plan includes curriculum additions such as reviewof DFM case studies, a hands-on casting lab, and machining observation, although the majorityof the course would be self-paced and taught through computer-aided manufacturing (CAM)software tutorials and computer projects. Avoiding the mistakes of past attempts to incorporatemanufacturing topics into mechanical engineering education by instead narrowing the vision forthe course to the practical context of enhancing students’ design skills, the proposed content
easy enough for a single person to operate. A finalizeddesign of a new zipline tower for the camp needed to be completed in the fall, while the newzipline tower was to be built during the spring semester. The implementation of the design wouldallow the camp to resume using the zipline, with hopes of increasing demand and usage of thenew facility.The project's scope of work is shown in Figure 1, which includes the tasks to be completed inthree phases throughout the year: scheduling (pre-design), planning (design), and construction.To kick off the project, students contacted the client and set up a site visit to examine the existingzipline setup and the space for new constructions. Three preliminary design ideas weredeveloped and sent to our
developing the High-QualityEngineering Guidebook [15].This qualitative research aimed to assess the effectiveness of four TaLENt fellows, who areschool-based teacher leaders, as in-school change agents for educators who are inexperiencedin engineering design. Notably, this study's term "novice teacher" does not exclusively refer tofirst-year teachers. Instead, it pertains to educators who have yet to attempt to integrateengineering design into their lesson plans. Literature ReviewThis literature review aims to provide an overview of the research conducted on teacher-ledprofessional development for engineering design, the use of action-based research in K-12settings, and the advantages of adopting an asset-based
facultyAbstract In engineering, most contingent faculty positions are held by minoritized groups such asbut not limited to Black, Indigenous, People of Color of all intersecting identities (BIPOCx)representing a missed opportunity to broaden participation. Since many of these professionalsdirectly support minoritized students in fundamental undergraduate courses, it is imperative tounderstand how to professionally develop and mentor these faculty. As part of a National ScienceFoundation Broadening Participation hub called Raíces Institute for Transformative Advocacy(RITA), the authors seek to facilitate a mentoring hub to train, mentor, and equip BIPOCxcontingent faculty to form their own grassroots transformative advocacy plans for
’ solutions. In 2022, we heldworkshops in March and October, with 32 and 47 participants, respectively, which includedstudents from 9 different institutions spanning five states and territories.Throughout critical points in the program, students evaluated their learning and provided surveyfeedback. The program organizers also performed a direct assessment of the student projects.From these data, we found that student learning progressed throughout the workshop. We plan tocontinue hosting these workshops and believe they positively impact student development andchange perspectives in engineering design, allowing them to understand culture’s influence onengineering design better.MethodsApproval: This study was carried out with Institutional Review
excerpts of studentresponses.In addition to reporting on the research question itself, this paper will serve as a process guide foranalysis of a small set of qualitative data in the context of chemical engineering education. Theintent is to make thematic analysis more accessible for faculty who might otherwise not considerthis approach in pedagogical work.IntroductionLaboratory courses are often the first, and sometimes only, place where undergraduate ChemicalEngineering students encounter real Chemical Engineering equipment and work in a large-scalelaboratory environment. Beyond technical and sensory experience, capstone laboratory alsoaffords students the ability to practice other critical skills, such as safety, experimental planning
) labs.All courses include hands-on activities of either pre-defined projects or open-ended students’chosen projects. To further align the SAFE mission with the degree plans, we decided to integrateour project-based learning with service and community-engaged learning. The goal is thatstudents would find true value in their technical and academic studies by putting them intopractice through community service.We started by approaching nonprofit organizations from within our community. The lack offinancial support for many nonprofit organizations induced several technologies and performancegaps which in turn can result in ineffective management and communication, an uninspired donorbase, and a lack of data-driven decision-making [9, 10]. For these
subjects at an early age [7]. Around a third of peopleworking in STEM careers attribute underrepresentation to not believing in their own ability tosucceed in these fields (34%), the lack of Black and Hispanic role models in these fields (32%),and discrimination in recruitment, hiring and promotions (32%) [7]. The SUPERCHARGEproject’s primary focus on STEM education attempts to addresses, at a state level, the acute lackof representation of low-income and Students of Color in STEM programs nationwide [8].Project Organization The SUPERCHARGE project is organized as a four-year program spanning from July2022 to June 2026. The project is currently in the midst of Year 1 (July 2022 – June 2023),which is designated as a planning, development
fromStanford University to Hampton University students. The course description is as the following:AA 274A: Principles of Robot Autonomy I (AA 174A, CS 237A, EE 160A, EE 260A)Basic principles for endowing mobile autonomous robots with perception, planning, and decision-making capabilities. Algorithmic approaches for robot perception, localization, and simultaneouslocalization and mapping; control of non-linear systems, learning-based control, and robot motionplanning; introduction to methodologies for reasoning under uncertainty, e.g., (partiallyobservable) Markov decision processes. Extensive use of the Robot Operating System (ROS) fordemonstrations and hands-on activities.Prerequisites: CS 106A or equivalent, CME 100 or equivalent (for linear
, and overall social stability.Southern Command, the Department of Defense’s Combatant Command responsible forrelationships with military leaders across the Caribbean, Central and South America investsannually in various programs that require military engineers to design, plan, and build projectsthat were requested by partner nations and approved by the commanding general. Theseprograms are critical to engineer officer and enlisted professional development. Engineer unitcommanders request these missions due to the realistic experiential training value and theproject’s alignment with deployment readiness skills. These State Department and CombatantCommander approved training projects provide engineer leaders and service members anopportunity to
exposure to standards while in school [3-5]. Through a study done in 2004, itwas revealed that standards education was not considered a priority at the institutions surveyed[6]. Nevertheless, employers expect new hires to possess knowledge of standards and theirapplications [5]. Moreover, collaboration between universities and industry is essential to ensurethat education programs are relevant and up-to-date. However, not all universities may haveestablished partnerships with industry, which can limit their ability to provide students withrelevant and practical education on standards and standardization.To bridge this gap, Georgia Southern University (GaSou) is planning and implementing acurriculum innovation to integrating engineering standards
planningcommittee grew to include partners from our campus Career Center and the Center forInnovation and Entrepreneurship. Each of these developments has expanded the scope of theseries and helped fill gaps in coverage.In total, the series has included 77 workshops covering 44 unique topics over the course of sevensemesters. The library led 33 workshops covering 11 topics while outside departments, includingthose on the planning committee, led 44 workshops covering 33 topics. Restrictions related to theCOVID-19 pandemic forced one workshop to be cancelled; otherwise, the workshops switchedto remote from fall 2020 through spring 2021 with some additional workshops transitioning toremote in spring 2022 per university recommendations on gatherings. Since
significant undertaking that requires properplanning and commitment. The planning phase is crucial in defining the scope of the work andsecuring the necessary resources for the project. During this phase, I used the followingquestions to guide my thought process. • Why is this open textbook project important? • What features are essential and are of pedagogical significance? • What resources are required for this project in terms of time commitment, funding, and team support? • What open platforms will be used to host the book? • How to maintain the book in the post-publication stage?As of 2019-2020, there were limited OER on thermodynamics [8-10] and on relevantengineering subjects in general. The proposed open textbook aims to
the course LMS, meet with the instructor to discuss the approach to the course, student discuss the approach to the course, student challenges and issues and plan for observed lessons. challenges and issues and plan for observed lessons. Section B: Flipped Classroom Observation Section B: Classroom Observation Tool Tool This tool includes observation items in areas This tool includes observation items in eight major areas: Lesson Organization, Content related to instructor-student interactions and Knowledge & Relevance
dispositional changes in STEM self-efficacy and identity.Students completed surveys and reflections at multiple points throughout their internship,including a retrospective pre/post survey capturing dispositional shifts during the experience.The results of the internship experience on student intern participants educational andprofessional plans at the 3 sites are evaluated in this paper. Results show significant gains onitems related to professional discernment (desire to work in a STEM field, use technical skills,on open ended problems for the betterment of society) for participants at all sites. Additionally,there are differences by gender.OverviewBeginning in 2015, the College of Engineering researchers and staff at UNIVERSITYdeveloped, piloted
important.The interview protocol was designed to correspond with Experiential Learning Theory’s (ELT)learning cycle (A. Y. Kolb & Kolb, 2009; D. A. Kolb, 1984). The learning cycle is composed offour parts: concrete experience, reflective observation, abstract conceptualization, and activeexperimentation. During the cycle an individual experiences an event (concrete experience),reflects on said experience (reflective observation), congeals said reflections into abstractconcepts (abstract conceptualization), and plans on using the concepts in future situations (activeexperimentation). The theory was selected to frame how/if students are learning professionalskills experientially through their participation in engineering project teams. Since project
follows: the next section presents an overview of the powerengineering curriculum redesign and motivations behind it; section III describes the situativepedagogy strategies that have been implemented; section IV presents the evaluation tools used toassess the effectiveness of the curriculum redesign; section V then presents and compares selectresults from the control and the test groups; finally, the paper concludes in section VI with asummary and a discussion on ongoing work and future plans. II. Power Engineering Curriculum Redesign Most courses in electric power engineering have remained unaltered in decades and are failingto deliver relevant information with respect to current energy needs and industry practice [1]-[7].Traditionally
canaddress them. In this stage, research scientists can collaborate with applied scientists,economists, and data scientists depending on the action that is being taken in the productexperience. In all cases there is engineering work required to make the desired changes, integratethe product with additional features, or setup the infrastructure to pilot new experiences.These product innovations are accompanied by an evaluation plan to measure the causal effect ofthe changes or new features on the outcomes of interest. The goal of the evaluation plan istypically to determine if the customer problem has been solved, which is often the definition ofsuccess. Economists and data scientists typically lead the causal inference part of the scienceworkflow.It