. Page 15.365.11 ReferencesBoni, A.A., Weingart, L.R., & Evenson, S. (2009, September). Innovation in an academic setting: Designing and leading a business through market-focused, interdisciplinary teams. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 8(3): 407-417.Green, J.V. (2009, January). An overview of the Hinman CEOs Program. U.S. Association for Small Business & Entrepreneurship Annual Conference, Anaheim, CA.Green, J.V. & Johnson, G.A. (2008, June). A holistic performance measurement system for entrepreneurship education. American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition, Pittsburgh, PA.Green, J.V. (2007, June). Discovering new
the recommendations ofthe students in this initial offering. More time will be used to introduce electrical engineeringmeasurement techniques and terminologies. Less classroom time will be used to discuss thefabrication process and this discussion will be moved to the laboratory sessions to fill downtimes during the processing. An overview lecture on electrical engineering will be developed andadded, along with more examples and discussions of electrical engineering job positions andskills. Page 15.745.14 12Bibliography1. www.montana.edu/msse.2. S
. Sanders, M., et al., Assessing interdisciplinary engineering capstone project. Proceedings for the 2006 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition.9. Latane, B., K. Williams, and S. Harkins, Many hands make light work: the causes and consequences of social loafing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1979. 37(6): p. 822-832.10. Milgrom, P. and J. Roberts, Economics, organization, and management. 1992, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.11. Strong, J.R. and R.E. Anderson, Free-riding in group projects: control mechanisms and preliminary data. Journal of Marketing Education, 1990. 12: p. 61-67
the Measure of Men: Science, Technology, and Ideologies of Western Dominance. Ithaca, Cornell University Press.Adas, M. (2006). Dominance by Design: Technological Imperatives and America's Civilizing Mission. Cambridge, Harvard University Press.Bridger, J. C. and A. E. Luloff (1999). "Toward an interactional approach to sustainable community development." Journal of Rural Studies 15: 377-387.Burkey, S. (1993). People first: A guide to self-reliant participatory rural development. London and New York, Zed Books.Diacon, T. A. (2004). Stringing Together a Nation: Candido Mariano da Silva Rondon and the Construction of a Modern Brazil, 1906-1930. Durham and London, Duke University Press.Downey, G. and J. Lucena
, humanities,business and social sciences.”17 The legacy of his guidance and vision live on at bothinstitutions.Bibliography1. National Academy of Engineering. The Engineer of 2020 – Visions of Engineering in the New Century. Page 15.1014.13 Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 2004.2. National Academy of Engineering. Educating the Engineer of 2020: Adapting Engineering Education to the New Century. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 2005.3. S.M. Blanchard, N. Egiebor, J.D. Sweeney, L. Zidek, C. Sechrist, S. Hulbert, J. Osborn, and R. O’Neill. Blank slate engineering at Florida Gulf Coast University – Innovative and
Grassroots level policy movements, professional associations and lobbying 10 1&2 Final Project PresentationReading Response Papers (3) – Short essays (minimum 2 pages double-spaced). May includereadings from textbook or from outside sources.Framing the Problem Papers (1) – Short essay (minimum 2 pages – Max 4 pages double-spaced) about an Engineering and Public Policy issue that you have been approved to writeabout. May include readings from textbook or from outside sources.Positional Papers (2) – Short arguments (minimum 3 pages double-spaced) For Positional Paper1, identify a situation, determine applicable decision-making framework(s), and argue oneposition for or against. For the second Positional Paper, write
appropriately, simulation can be used to wring the mostperformance out of engineered systems at an acceptable cost. A vivid example of this is the caseof the Speedo LZR swimsuit which was developed through a combination of simulation andphysical testing. Experts used FLUENT, a commercial computational fluid dynamics (CFD)software, to design modifications in the suit that led to a reduction in the water drag on thewearer. Swimmers wearing the LZR suit went on to claim 33 of the first 36 medals in the BeijingOlympic games and continue to break world records, as reported in the popular press6. If mostengineers, not just specialists with Ph.D.’s, are able to deploy simulation effectively, there wouldundoubtedly be significant improvements in the engineered
the students and faculty agree that this project has stimulatedstudent interest and has facilitated a more project orientated group of young engineers ready tocontinue their education.Bibliography1. M. Lowe, H. Moore, E. Langrall, and C. Gehrman, “Robots in the introductory physics laboratory,” American Journal of Physics, vol. 76, issue 10, pp. 895-902, Oct. 2008.2. K. C. Bower, T. E. Mays, and C. M. Miller, “Small Group, Self-Directed Problem Based Learning Development In A Traditional Engineering Program,” 34th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, Session S1B, pp. 16-21, Oct. 2004.3. L. G. Huettel, A. S. Brown, K. D. Coonley, M. R. Gustafson, J. Kim, G. A. Ybarra, and L. M. Collins, “Fundamentals of
reuse of the CALS Horse Barn is a good example of the Next Generation SeniorCapstone Design project. This project derived from the College of Engineering’s collaborativerelationship with the campus FP&M office. This is a real project currently in the final planningstages within the campus architect’s office. With the Capstone student involvement, the campusbenefits from the design insight and reality check the student work provides while clientsbecome more engaged in the design process providing more clearly articulate needs, wants anddesires. The students benefit from real world project challenges and through interaction withtheir clients.The project encompassed the rehabilitation of an 1880’s era, 18,000 GSF barn into asocial/conference
Student Responses for Q1For Q1 - “Who is the client?”, students are required to identify the direct client. This is theperson(s) who will utilize the written procedure or solution developed by the team. Descriptionsof the types of clients identified by students and sample student responses are shown in Tables 1-3. For each MEA, the types of clients are divided into four categories: 1) the direct client, 2) theindirect client, 3) non-clients, and 4) multiple clients - a combination of 1-3. For MEA 1 (Table1), the direct client is the technical installation team of TLP (a security system company) whowill install the security laser system and ultimately use the written procedure developed by theteam. The indirect clients include the CEO of TLP and
more complete design whereas a large project is difficult to downsize. The fall quarter project was too large for the short time frame. The winter quarter project, a renovation of an 8,000 square foot 1930’s building with an addition is expected to better complement the available time. o Project type is critical; the students should be reasonably comfortable with required technical expertise and use that expertise as a platform to explore the team and integrated project requirements. Winter quarter’s project which involves a renovation/seismic upgrade of an unreinforced masonry structure requires technical expertise for the ARCE students that are not covered in regular course work. This additional technical
plane and descriptive geometry with particular reference to the physical symbol system [26]. 3. As spatial visualisation skills are important for success in engineering [30], evaluation of participant’s spatial abilities pre and post instruction needs to take place to establish if improvement is occurring contemporaneously.Bibliography1. Lane, D., Seery, N., Gordon, S., The Understated Value of Freehand Sketching in Technology Education. Engineering Design Graphics Journal, 2009. 73(3): p. 10.2. Felder, R.M., Woods, D.R., Stice, J.E., Rugarcia, A., The Future of Engineering Education. II Teaching Methods That Work. Chem. Engr. Education, 2000. 34(1): p. 14.3. DES. Minister Hanafin launches
/2000/cawmset0409/cawmset_0409.pdf5. U.S. Department of Labor. (2002). Bureau of Labor Statistics, Unpublished data, Annual Averages 2002, Current Population Survey.6. Jeffers, A. T., Safferman, A. G., & Safferman, S. I. (2004). Understanding K-12 engineering outreach programs. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, 130, 95-108.7. Peterson, L., Tiernan, C., & Broussard, L. (2009). Girlgeneering vs. Entry to Engineering: Engineering Outreach Program Comparison of a Girls-Only vs. Co-Ed Engineering Summer Camp. Proceedings of the 2009 ASEE Gulf-Southwest Annual Conference – Baylor University, 2009.8. Margolis, J., Fisher, A., & Miller, F. (1999). Caring about
. Lane, N. (1999) Why are there so few women in science? Available online at:http://helix.nature.com/debates/women/women_contents.htlm. Retrieved 1/5/10.8. Brainard, S. G. & Carlin, L. (1998) A six-year longitudinal study of undergraduate women in engineering andscience, Journal of Engineering Education, 87(4), 17–27.9. Whitelegg, L. (2001) Girls in science education: of rice and fruit trees, in: M. Lederman, & I. Bartsch (Eds) Thegender and science reader (New York, Routledge), 373–382.10. Fennema, E. & Peterson, P. (1985) Autonomous learning behavior: a possible explanation of gender-relateddifferences in mathematics, in: L. C. Wilkinson & C. B. Marrett (Eds) Gender influences in classroom interaction(New York, Academic Press
semester, the graduate courses at two credits. Project operation followed a model familiar to engineering projects in industry. The authorapplied an operational methodology used during his employment in the late 1990’s in theautomobile parts industry. The fundamental structure clearly defined the students as thedesigners and developers; the professor’s role was that of mentor and design guide. This wasvery definitely not a case where the students obtained their technical information from theprofessor. The team met every Thursday afternoon, initially for three hours. During the first meeting,the tasking to be accomplished by each member of the team was identified, with particular
. (2008). “Integrated Design is Green,” Journal of Green Building, Vol. 3, No 4, pp. 78-94.15 Denning, S. (2004). “Telling Tales,” Harvard Business Review Online, July.16 Lightner, E. (2008) “Evolution and Progress of Smart Grid Development at the Department of Energy”, Presented at the FERC/NARUC Collaborative Workshop.17 Baldrige National Quality Program, 2009 - 2010 Criteria for Performance Excellence, Gaithersburg, Maryland.18 Timmons, J.A. (2006). New Venture Creation: Entrepreneurship for the 21st Century, 7th Edition. McGraw- Hill, pp. 191 – 210.19 Baldrige National Quality Program, 2009-2010 Education Criteria for Performance Excellence, Gaithersburg, Maryland, p. iv
.). San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann.6 Prensky, M. (2001). Digital game-based learning (1 ed.). St. Paul, MN: Paragon House.7 Berque, D. (2006). An evaluation of a broad deployment of DyKnow software to support note taking and interaction using pen-based computers. Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges, 21(6), 204-216.8 Lindell, S. (2010). Real-time collaboration tools for digital ink. Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges, 25(3), 24-31.9 Ramesh, C., Rusu, A., Ismail, M., & Skoglund, M. (2007). TrACS: transceiver architecture and wireless channel simulator. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 20th annual conference on Integrated circuits and systems design
, TryScience. Try Engineering website. Available online at http://www.tryengineering.org/play.php. (January 6, 2010)11. Dym, C. and P. Little. 2008. Engineering Design: A Project-Based Introduction. John Wiley and Sons Inc.12. Agosto, D. 2004. Design vs. Content: A Study of Adolescent Girls’ Website Design Preferences. International Journal of Technology and Design Education. 14: 245-260.13. Gibbons, M. 2007. Engineering by the Numbers. American Society of Engineering Education 2007 Engineering Profile. Available online at http://www.asee.org/publications/profiles/upload/2007ProfileEng.pdf. (January 7, 2010)14. Jacobs, J. and S. Simpkins. 2005. Mapping Leaks in the Math, Science, and Technology Pipeline. New
”, NACME Research Letter, Special Edition, NACME, Inc., New York, NY.[9] Crain, R.W.and Prouty, R. (1994). “Community College and University cooperation in engineering and engineering technology in the State of Washington.” Frontiers in Education Conference, 1994. Twenty-fourth Annual Conference Proceedings. IEEE: San Jose, CA.[10] DeBerard, S., & Spelmans, G. (2004). Predictors of Academic Achievement and Retention Among College Freshmen: A Longitudinal Study. College Student Journal, 38, (1), 66-80.[11] Durkheim, Emile. (1961). Suicide, trans. John A. Spaulding and George Simpson. New York: Free Press.[12] Guiffrida, D. A. (2003). African American student organizations as agents of social integration. Journal of
. Page 15.1012.6 Figure 6: Third Generation Design to be ManufacturedResearch on Rapid ManufacturingUpon the suggestion from a project mentor of investigating the feasibility of rapid prototyping,the team began to research this process. Initial research found out the basics of rapid prototyping:“rapid prototyping is the automatic construction of physical objects using additive manufacturingtechnologies.” [5] Rapid prototyping began in the 1980’s and has evolved greatly to the majorproduction means that it is today. Since the team had little knowledge of the process of rapidprototyping, a local prototyping company allowed a tour of their facility so the team couldbecome more familiar with the process. The powdered
Science Foundation (EEC#0647460, 0647532, and 0647929). The views expressed represent those of the authors and notnecessarily those of the National Science Foundation. Page 15.749.13Bibliography1. American Society of Civil Engineers (2009). Code of ethics. Retrieved December 23, 2009 from https://www.asce.org/inside/codeofethics.cfm2. Astin, A. W. (1993). Assessment for excellence: The philosophy and practice of assessment and evaluation in higher education. Phoenix, AZ: The Oryx Press.3. Bebeau, M. J., & Thoma, S. J. (1999). “Intermediate” concepts and the connection to moral education. Educational Psychological Review, 11
, What the best college teachers do. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2004.[3] R. Boice, "New faculty as teachers," Journal of Higher Education, vol. 62, pp. 150-173, 1991.[4] R. Boice, Advice for New Faculty Members. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon, 2000.[5] B. G. Davis, Tools for Teaching. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 1993.[6] P. L. Fox, S. P. Hundley, and H. O. Yurtseven, "Engineering technology faculty salaries: The past, the present, and the future," in 2000 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition: Engineering Education Beyond the Millenium, June 18, 2000 - June 21, 2000, St. Louis, MO, United states, 2000, pp. 2517-2522.[7] T. K. Grose. (January 2007) 21st Century Professor. ASEE Magazine.[8] J. W
order to eliminate the drag in the video andsound recording.From the 4 Panopto videos I have view so far I like this method of delivery.Panopto is very good. I wonder why we have to go through surveys before we could use it. I alsowonder why we waited this long before viewing the videos.I have a satellite internet connection. it is high speed DSL but will not run the Panopto. I haveto go to a place of business that has a high speed DSL with wireless to do any viewing. It is hardto concentrate and hear with earphones in a public place. Also it is very inconvenient with myschedule.My internet speed at home does not support the 300Mb/s that Panopto requires. I have to go towork at 5am to view the classes. It is still very much worth the trouble
, A., Benne, B., & Kalay, Y. E. (1998). Intelligent representation for computer- aided building design. Automation In Construction, 8, 49-71. 16 Eastman, C., Teicholz, P., Sacks, R., & Liston, K. (2008). BIM handbook: A guide to Building Information Modeling for owners, managers, designers, engineers, and contractors. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons. 17 Jernigan, F. (2007). BIG BIM small bim: The practical approach to Building Information Modeling, integrated practice done the right way! (1st ed.). Salisbury, MD: 4Sites Press. 18 Fox, S., & Hietanen, J. (2007). Interorganizational use of building information models: Potential for automational, informational and transformational effects
Page 15.561.12 (2008).2. P. Dawson, I. Han, M. Cox, C. Black, and L. Simmons, "Residence Time and Food Contact Time Effects on Transfer of Salmonella Typhimurium from Tile, Wood and Carpet: Testing the Five-Second Rule," Journal of Applied Microbiology, 102 [4] 945-53 (2007).3. J. Epstein, "Small Group Learning for 14,000 Undergrads" (2007) Inside Higher ED. Accessed on: August 1, 2007. Available at 4. B.I. Lee, S. Kaewgun, W. Kim, W. Choi, J.S. Lee, and E. Kim, "Visible Light Photocatalytic Properties of Polymorphic Brookite Titania," Journal of Renewable and Sustainable Energy, 1 [2] 023101 (2009).5. J.R. Wagner, "Embedding Creative Inquiry in the Undergraduate Geology," p. 218 in Vol. 38 2006
may “feel” less obvious; yet, RETs made strong connections between their summerresearch and their future goals. For example, one participant stated: “It has opened my mind upto a Masters, not in literacy. It’s possible that I would look for something in science education ormaybe even a particular science.” Yet another said: “There is a possibility of co-writing a grant. Iwould like to do more research at the community college.”Bibliography1. Kazerounian, K. & Foley S. (2007). Barriers to creativity in
Encyclopedia of Social Measurement, K. Kempf-Leonard, Editor. 2005, Elsevier: New York. p. 927-938.9. Stake, R.E., The Art Of Case Study Research. 1995: Sage Publications Inc.10. Guba, E.G. and Y.S. Lincoln, Fourth Generation Evaluation. 1989, Newbury Park, London, New Delhi: Sage.11. Brand, S., How Buildings Learn: What Happens After They're Built. 1994, London: Viking Penguin.12. Gibbons, A.S. and P.C. Rogers, The Architecture of Instructional Theory, in Instructional Design Theories and Models: Building a Common Knowledge Base (Vol III). 2009, Routledge. p. 305-326. Page 15.1109.12
: Association of American Colleges.2. Berryman, S.E. (1983) Who will do science? Minority and female attainment of science and mathematics degrees: trends and cause. New York, NY: Rockefeller Foundation.3. Hesse-Biber, S. N. & Leavy, P. (2006). The practice of qualitative research Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.4. Yow, V. R. (2005). Recording Oral History: A Guide For the Humanities and Social Sciences. Walnut Creek, CA: Altamira Press.5. Reason, P. & Denzin, N. (1994) Three Approaches to Participative Inquiry in Handbook of Qualitative Research Norman K., and Lincoln, Y. (Eds). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.6. Few A. L., Stephens D. P., & Rouse-Arnett, M. (2003) Sister-to-Sister Talk: Transcending Boundaries and
year reform)3. Baldwin, Doug. 2006. Aerospace for Educators: Removing the fear of teaching aerospace concepts in the classroom. Technical Papers – Space 2006 Conference, v. 2: 1007 – 1012. (aerospace in the classroom)4. Craig, J. L. et al. 2008. Innovation across the curriculum: three case studies in teaching science and engineering communication. 2008. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, v. 51, n 3, 280 – 301. Sept 2008. (aerospace in the classroom)5. Fraiberg, S. and Adam, M. 2002. Designing a writing across the curriculum program at the University of Michigan’s college of engineering. IEEE International Professional Communication Conference, 530-537. (communication issues)6. Galloway