. Poster session presented at the 4th International Conference on Environmental Science and Technology, Houston, TX.4. Perryman, M. Ray. (2007, February). The Potential Impact of an Initiative to Increase the Pool of Engineering and Computer Science Graduates on Business Activity in Texas. Waco, TX: Perryman Group.5. U.S. Department of Labor Report (2008). Retrieved February 1, 2009 from http://www.dol.gov/esa/olms/regs/compliance/rrlo/lmrda.htm.6. Wang, Y., Zhu, Y., Salinas, R., Karnae, S., Ramirez, D., & John, K. (2008). Roadside measurements of ultrafine particles at a busy urban intersection, Journal of Air and Waste Management Association, 58:1449–1457.7. West Texas Office of Evaluation and Research (WTER
.1Bibliography1. Shine, S., Kiravu, C., and Astley, J., “In Defense of Open-Book Engineering Degree Examinations.” International Journal of Mechanical Engineering Education, Vol. 32, No. 3, July 2005, pp. 197-211.2. Theophilides, C. and Koutselini, M., “Study Behavior in the Closed Book and the Open Book Examination: A Comparative Analysis,” Educational Research and Evaluation, Vol. 6, No. 4, December 2000, pp. 379-393.3. Theophilides, C., and Dionysiou, O., The major functions of the open-book examination at the university level; A factor analytic study, “Studies in Educational Evaluation, Vol. 22, No. 2, 1996, pp. 157-170.4. Williams, J.R., and Wong, A. (2009), “The Efficacy of Final Examinations: A comparative study of closed
arethinking about purpose.Bibliography1 Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs,” October 31, 2009, ABET Inc.2 “University Relations: Desired Attributes of an Engineer,” Boeinghttp://www.boeing.com/educationrelations/attributes.htms3 Clooney, E., Alfrey, K., and Owens, S., “Critical Thinking in Engineering and Technology Education: A Review,”Proceedings of the 2008 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition, ASEE4 Worldwide CDIO Initiative. https://www.cdio.org, January 20095 Agrawal, Pradeep K. “Integration of Critical Thinking and Technical Communication into UndergraduateLaboratory Courses.” Proceedings of the 1997 American Society for Engineering
Oriented towards inputs or outputs. o Structure of the evaluation model. • Economic Aspects o Sources of financing, fees, and costs. • Relation of accredited programsThe contents of each section for each agency were based on material found on the agency’s webpage(s), on normative and operation documents of the agency, and on interviews with those withthe agency responsible for development and operations. Page 15.334.4The information obtained has been organized and analyzed in three distinct ways: 1. In a homogenized way and presented in a series of informative summary tables with the information specific to each system
maps as facilitative tools in schools and corporations. 1998, Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.30. Weiss, C.H., Evaluation: Methods for studying programs and policies. 1998, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice Hall, Inc.31. Strauss, A.L. and J. Corbin, Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. 1990, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.32. Scale-up in Education: Volume 1: Ideas in Principle, ed. B. Schneider and S.-K. McDonald. 2006: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc. 328. Page 15.500.15
. Page 15.263.914. Fortenberry, N.L., Sullivan, J.F., Jordan, P.N., Knight, D.W. (2007). Retention: Engineering education Research aids instruction. Science, 317(5842), 1175-1176.15. Rhoten, D., Pfirman, S. (2006) Women in interdisciplinary science: exploring preferences and consequences. Research Policy, 36, 56-75. Page 15.263.10Appendix ACareerWISE: An Interdisciplinary Experience for Graduate StudentsQuestions for Team Members The following questions will be used to help us better understand the experiences of students and faculty members who work on a large, interdisciplinary research team. Please respond to the
15.674.12improvement in programs and services8. Page – 11 -The management of SBT places a high premium on on-going self-assessment to monitor therigor, quality, and effectiveness of each of its academic programs. With the on-going self-assessment, SBT not only assesses the results of program outcomes but also continuouslyevaluates its “assessment process” to establish a systematic and sustained assessmentapproach and create an assessment environment that is receptive, supportive and enabling.Bibliography1. Anwar, S., Rolle, J.A.,& Memon A. A. (2005), Use of Web-based Portfolios to Assess Technical Competencies of Engineering Technology Students –A Case Study. Proceedings: 2005 ASEE Annual Conference
. Theauthor would also like to thank Darla Cooper, Michelle Barton, and Kathy Booth of the @ONEScholars Program, and Charles Iverson of Cañada College for invaluable input, discussions,comments, and suggestions.References1. Birk, J., & Foster, J. (1993). The importance of Lecture in General Chemistry Course Performance. Journal of Chemical Education, 70, 180-182.2. Meltzer, D. E., & K. Manivannan, K. (1996). Promoting Interactivity in Physics Lecture Classes. The Phys. Teacher, 34, 72-76.3. Felder, R.M., Felder, G. N. & Dietz, E. J. (1998). A Longitudinal Study of Engineering Student Performance and Retention. V. Comparisons with Traditionally-Taught Students, J. Engr. Education, 87, 469-480.4. Rodger, S. H. (1995). An
Outsourcing Trends”, Computer Economics, 2006(http://www.computereconomics.com/article.cfm?id=1161)4. “Outsourcing Trends to Watch in 2010”, Computer World, December 2009(http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9142427/10_outsourcing_trends_to_watch_in_2010) .5. “Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Technology Programs, Effective for Evaluations During the 2010-2011Accreditation Cycle”. ABET Technology Accreditation Commission. October 2009.(http://www.abet.org/Linked%20Documents-UPDATE/Criteria%20and%20PP/T001%2010-11%20TAC%20Criteria%2011-3-09.pdf ) Page 15.934.13
://seniordesign.engr.uidaho.edu/1999_2000/powerbrokers/ .[5] Schlee, J., I. Higginson, P. Anderson, W. Knepper, S. Frazier, and H.Hess, “Taylor Wilderness Research StationPower System Expansion,” Internal Report, Department of ECE, University of Idaho, 11 December 2009.[6] Nelson, R., D. Flegel, B. Johnson, and H. Hess, (2002, June 19). “Undergraduate Research and TeachingOpportunities from a Transient Network Analyzer,” Retrieved 8 January 2010, from Past Asee Annual Conferenceswebsite: http://soa.asee.org/paper/conference/paper-view.cfm?id=17878 . Page 15.1302.14
Student Responses for Q1For Q1 - “Who is the client?”, students are required to identify the direct client. This is theperson(s) who will utilize the written procedure or solution developed by the team. Descriptionsof the types of clients identified by students and sample student responses are shown in Tables 1-3. For each MEA, the types of clients are divided into four categories: 1) the direct client, 2) theindirect client, 3) non-clients, and 4) multiple clients - a combination of 1-3. For MEA 1 (Table1), the direct client is the technical installation team of TLP (a security system company) whowill install the security laser system and ultimately use the written procedure developed by theteam. The indirect clients include the CEO of TLP and
more complete design whereas a large project is difficult to downsize. The fall quarter project was too large for the short time frame. The winter quarter project, a renovation of an 8,000 square foot 1930’s building with an addition is expected to better complement the available time. o Project type is critical; the students should be reasonably comfortable with required technical expertise and use that expertise as a platform to explore the team and integrated project requirements. Winter quarter’s project which involves a renovation/seismic upgrade of an unreinforced masonry structure requires technical expertise for the ARCE students that are not covered in regular course work. This additional technical
plane and descriptive geometry with particular reference to the physical symbol system [26]. 3. As spatial visualisation skills are important for success in engineering [30], evaluation of participant’s spatial abilities pre and post instruction needs to take place to establish if improvement is occurring contemporaneously.Bibliography1. Lane, D., Seery, N., Gordon, S., The Understated Value of Freehand Sketching in Technology Education. Engineering Design Graphics Journal, 2009. 73(3): p. 10.2. Felder, R.M., Woods, D.R., Stice, J.E., Rugarcia, A., The Future of Engineering Education. II Teaching Methods That Work. Chem. Engr. Education, 2000. 34(1): p. 14.3. DES. Minister Hanafin launches
/2000/cawmset0409/cawmset_0409.pdf5. U.S. Department of Labor. (2002). Bureau of Labor Statistics, Unpublished data, Annual Averages 2002, Current Population Survey.6. Jeffers, A. T., Safferman, A. G., & Safferman, S. I. (2004). Understanding K-12 engineering outreach programs. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, 130, 95-108.7. Peterson, L., Tiernan, C., & Broussard, L. (2009). Girlgeneering vs. Entry to Engineering: Engineering Outreach Program Comparison of a Girls-Only vs. Co-Ed Engineering Summer Camp. Proceedings of the 2009 ASEE Gulf-Southwest Annual Conference – Baylor University, 2009.8. Margolis, J., Fisher, A., & Miller, F. (1999). Caring about
. Lane, N. (1999) Why are there so few women in science? Available online at:http://helix.nature.com/debates/women/women_contents.htlm. Retrieved 1/5/10.8. Brainard, S. G. & Carlin, L. (1998) A six-year longitudinal study of undergraduate women in engineering andscience, Journal of Engineering Education, 87(4), 17–27.9. Whitelegg, L. (2001) Girls in science education: of rice and fruit trees, in: M. Lederman, & I. Bartsch (Eds) Thegender and science reader (New York, Routledge), 373–382.10. Fennema, E. & Peterson, P. (1985) Autonomous learning behavior: a possible explanation of gender-relateddifferences in mathematics, in: L. C. Wilkinson & C. B. Marrett (Eds) Gender influences in classroom interaction(New York, Academic Press
semester, the graduate courses at two credits. Project operation followed a model familiar to engineering projects in industry. The authorapplied an operational methodology used during his employment in the late 1990’s in theautomobile parts industry. The fundamental structure clearly defined the students as thedesigners and developers; the professor’s role was that of mentor and design guide. This wasvery definitely not a case where the students obtained their technical information from theprofessor. The team met every Thursday afternoon, initially for three hours. During the first meeting,the tasking to be accomplished by each member of the team was identified, with particular
. (2008). “Integrated Design is Green,” Journal of Green Building, Vol. 3, No 4, pp. 78-94.15 Denning, S. (2004). “Telling Tales,” Harvard Business Review Online, July.16 Lightner, E. (2008) “Evolution and Progress of Smart Grid Development at the Department of Energy”, Presented at the FERC/NARUC Collaborative Workshop.17 Baldrige National Quality Program, 2009 - 2010 Criteria for Performance Excellence, Gaithersburg, Maryland.18 Timmons, J.A. (2006). New Venture Creation: Entrepreneurship for the 21st Century, 7th Edition. McGraw- Hill, pp. 191 – 210.19 Baldrige National Quality Program, 2009-2010 Education Criteria for Performance Excellence, Gaithersburg, Maryland, p. iv
.). San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann.6 Prensky, M. (2001). Digital game-based learning (1 ed.). St. Paul, MN: Paragon House.7 Berque, D. (2006). An evaluation of a broad deployment of DyKnow software to support note taking and interaction using pen-based computers. Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges, 21(6), 204-216.8 Lindell, S. (2010). Real-time collaboration tools for digital ink. Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges, 25(3), 24-31.9 Ramesh, C., Rusu, A., Ismail, M., & Skoglund, M. (2007). TrACS: transceiver architecture and wireless channel simulator. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 20th annual conference on Integrated circuits and systems design
, TryScience. Try Engineering website. Available online at http://www.tryengineering.org/play.php. (January 6, 2010)11. Dym, C. and P. Little. 2008. Engineering Design: A Project-Based Introduction. John Wiley and Sons Inc.12. Agosto, D. 2004. Design vs. Content: A Study of Adolescent Girls’ Website Design Preferences. International Journal of Technology and Design Education. 14: 245-260.13. Gibbons, M. 2007. Engineering by the Numbers. American Society of Engineering Education 2007 Engineering Profile. Available online at http://www.asee.org/publications/profiles/upload/2007ProfileEng.pdf. (January 7, 2010)14. Jacobs, J. and S. Simpkins. 2005. Mapping Leaks in the Math, Science, and Technology Pipeline. New
”, NACME Research Letter, Special Edition, NACME, Inc., New York, NY.[9] Crain, R.W.and Prouty, R. (1994). “Community College and University cooperation in engineering and engineering technology in the State of Washington.” Frontiers in Education Conference, 1994. Twenty-fourth Annual Conference Proceedings. IEEE: San Jose, CA.[10] DeBerard, S., & Spelmans, G. (2004). Predictors of Academic Achievement and Retention Among College Freshmen: A Longitudinal Study. College Student Journal, 38, (1), 66-80.[11] Durkheim, Emile. (1961). Suicide, trans. John A. Spaulding and George Simpson. New York: Free Press.[12] Guiffrida, D. A. (2003). African American student organizations as agents of social integration. Journal of
. Page 15.1012.6 Figure 6: Third Generation Design to be ManufacturedResearch on Rapid ManufacturingUpon the suggestion from a project mentor of investigating the feasibility of rapid prototyping,the team began to research this process. Initial research found out the basics of rapid prototyping:“rapid prototyping is the automatic construction of physical objects using additive manufacturingtechnologies.” [5] Rapid prototyping began in the 1980’s and has evolved greatly to the majorproduction means that it is today. Since the team had little knowledge of the process of rapidprototyping, a local prototyping company allowed a tour of their facility so the team couldbecome more familiar with the process. The powdered
Science Foundation (EEC#0647460, 0647532, and 0647929). The views expressed represent those of the authors and notnecessarily those of the National Science Foundation. Page 15.749.13Bibliography1. American Society of Civil Engineers (2009). Code of ethics. Retrieved December 23, 2009 from https://www.asce.org/inside/codeofethics.cfm2. Astin, A. W. (1993). Assessment for excellence: The philosophy and practice of assessment and evaluation in higher education. Phoenix, AZ: The Oryx Press.3. Bebeau, M. J., & Thoma, S. J. (1999). “Intermediate” concepts and the connection to moral education. Educational Psychological Review, 11
, What the best college teachers do. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2004.[3] R. Boice, "New faculty as teachers," Journal of Higher Education, vol. 62, pp. 150-173, 1991.[4] R. Boice, Advice for New Faculty Members. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon, 2000.[5] B. G. Davis, Tools for Teaching. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 1993.[6] P. L. Fox, S. P. Hundley, and H. O. Yurtseven, "Engineering technology faculty salaries: The past, the present, and the future," in 2000 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition: Engineering Education Beyond the Millenium, June 18, 2000 - June 21, 2000, St. Louis, MO, United states, 2000, pp. 2517-2522.[7] T. K. Grose. (January 2007) 21st Century Professor. ASEE Magazine.[8] J. W
order to eliminate the drag in the video andsound recording.From the 4 Panopto videos I have view so far I like this method of delivery.Panopto is very good. I wonder why we have to go through surveys before we could use it. I alsowonder why we waited this long before viewing the videos.I have a satellite internet connection. it is high speed DSL but will not run the Panopto. I haveto go to a place of business that has a high speed DSL with wireless to do any viewing. It is hardto concentrate and hear with earphones in a public place. Also it is very inconvenient with myschedule.My internet speed at home does not support the 300Mb/s that Panopto requires. I have to go towork at 5am to view the classes. It is still very much worth the trouble
, A., Benne, B., & Kalay, Y. E. (1998). Intelligent representation for computer- aided building design. Automation In Construction, 8, 49-71. 16 Eastman, C., Teicholz, P., Sacks, R., & Liston, K. (2008). BIM handbook: A guide to Building Information Modeling for owners, managers, designers, engineers, and contractors. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons. 17 Jernigan, F. (2007). BIG BIM small bim: The practical approach to Building Information Modeling, integrated practice done the right way! (1st ed.). Salisbury, MD: 4Sites Press. 18 Fox, S., & Hietanen, J. (2007). Interorganizational use of building information models: Potential for automational, informational and transformational effects
Page 15.561.12 (2008).2. P. Dawson, I. Han, M. Cox, C. Black, and L. Simmons, "Residence Time and Food Contact Time Effects on Transfer of Salmonella Typhimurium from Tile, Wood and Carpet: Testing the Five-Second Rule," Journal of Applied Microbiology, 102 [4] 945-53 (2007).3. J. Epstein, "Small Group Learning for 14,000 Undergrads" (2007) Inside Higher ED. Accessed on: August 1, 2007. Available at 4. B.I. Lee, S. Kaewgun, W. Kim, W. Choi, J.S. Lee, and E. Kim, "Visible Light Photocatalytic Properties of Polymorphic Brookite Titania," Journal of Renewable and Sustainable Energy, 1 [2] 023101 (2009).5. J.R. Wagner, "Embedding Creative Inquiry in the Undergraduate Geology," p. 218 in Vol. 38 2006
may “feel” less obvious; yet, RETs made strong connections between their summerresearch and their future goals. For example, one participant stated: “It has opened my mind upto a Masters, not in literacy. It’s possible that I would look for something in science education ormaybe even a particular science.” Yet another said: “There is a possibility of co-writing a grant. Iwould like to do more research at the community college.”Bibliography1. Kazerounian, K. & Foley S. (2007). Barriers to creativity in
Encyclopedia of Social Measurement, K. Kempf-Leonard, Editor. 2005, Elsevier: New York. p. 927-938.9. Stake, R.E., The Art Of Case Study Research. 1995: Sage Publications Inc.10. Guba, E.G. and Y.S. Lincoln, Fourth Generation Evaluation. 1989, Newbury Park, London, New Delhi: Sage.11. Brand, S., How Buildings Learn: What Happens After They're Built. 1994, London: Viking Penguin.12. Gibbons, A.S. and P.C. Rogers, The Architecture of Instructional Theory, in Instructional Design Theories and Models: Building a Common Knowledge Base (Vol III). 2009, Routledge. p. 305-326. Page 15.1109.12
: Association of American Colleges.2. Berryman, S.E. (1983) Who will do science? Minority and female attainment of science and mathematics degrees: trends and cause. New York, NY: Rockefeller Foundation.3. Hesse-Biber, S. N. & Leavy, P. (2006). The practice of qualitative research Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.4. Yow, V. R. (2005). Recording Oral History: A Guide For the Humanities and Social Sciences. Walnut Creek, CA: Altamira Press.5. Reason, P. & Denzin, N. (1994) Three Approaches to Participative Inquiry in Handbook of Qualitative Research Norman K., and Lincoln, Y. (Eds). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.6. Few A. L., Stephens D. P., & Rouse-Arnett, M. (2003) Sister-to-Sister Talk: Transcending Boundaries and
year reform)3. Baldwin, Doug. 2006. Aerospace for Educators: Removing the fear of teaching aerospace concepts in the classroom. Technical Papers – Space 2006 Conference, v. 2: 1007 – 1012. (aerospace in the classroom)4. Craig, J. L. et al. 2008. Innovation across the curriculum: three case studies in teaching science and engineering communication. 2008. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, v. 51, n 3, 280 – 301. Sept 2008. (aerospace in the classroom)5. Fraiberg, S. and Adam, M. 2002. Designing a writing across the curriculum program at the University of Michigan’s college of engineering. IEEE International Professional Communication Conference, 530-537. (communication issues)6. Galloway