AC 2011-146: TEACHING ETHICS FOR PREPARING TRANSPORTA-TION SYSTEMS AND MANAGEMENT STUDENTS FOR PROFESSIONALPRACTICERobert M. Brooks, Temple University Dr. Robert M. Brooks is an associate professor in the department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Temple University. He is a registered professional engineer in PA and a fellow of the American Society of Civil Engineers. His research interests are Civil Engineering Materials, Transportation Engineering, and Engineering Education.Jyothsna K S, Department of English, St.Joseph’s College, Bangalore Secured a gold Medal for the highest aggregate marks in the Post Graduate English Literature Course at St.Joseph’s College (Autonomous). Working for the Department of
AC 2011-2419: TOOLS TO CRAFT ETHICAL BEHAVIORMartin S. High, Oklahoma State University Marty High is an Associate Professor of Chemical Engineering at Oklahoma State University. His aca- demic interests include teaching in all areas and at all levels of chemical engineering with a focus on instruction in thermodynamics and mass transfer. His research interests are in the areas of mass transfer in polymeric systems, corrosion modeling, equation of state development and refinery catalysis. Marty also writes in the area of sustainability and on the intersection of law, science and society. He received his engineering education at Penn State (B.S., M.S., and Ph.D.) and earned his law degree (J.D.) from the
. This is the case when all team members are involved in the decision making process and participate in problem solving activities. Timely accomplishment of goals is greatly enhanced by having an agreed upon decision making process. Avoiding the “paralysis by analysis” problem is critical to the team‟s success. In some cases, decisions must be made by consensus. Once a decision has been reached, even through consensus, all team members must accept, own and support it. Appreciation and celebration for team‟s success is also important. Human beings want to be appreciated and valued for contributions. It is the leader‟s responsibility, in many cases, to ensure that this need is met. Working in a
technology.With this background, it‟s not surprising that many of our students connect to technologythrough science fiction (SciFi). This paper describes a course on artificial intelligence andscience fiction. It has been offered as a general education elective, meeting writing-intensive,literature, and ethics categories for undergraduates, and as a graduate course with semester-longprojects.Artificial intelligence (AI) presents many complex theoretical, societal and ethical issues thathave historically been examined in works of science fiction. The interplay between sciencefiction from the 1950s to the present and the development of the field of AI can be used to showhow imaginative creativity and technical innovation fueled each other. As a non-AI
theoretical framework that posited discrete stages of moral development. Further, hedeveloped, for the first time, an empirical means of assessing individual levels of moraldevelopment. This theory has inspired the most widely used and researched assessment tools formoral reasoning [19], such as the Defining Issues Test (DIT) by James Rest [20]. However,Kohlberg's theory has been criticized on several accounts, most notably by Carol Gilligan in the1980's as containing an implicit gender bias [21]. Emerging from Gilligan's work was theobservation that Kohlberg's theory was founded on the deontological (duty-based) philosophy of Page 22.1505.5Kant and
-year calculus-based physics course reduced the achievement gap between menand women in the course, and elevated women‟s modal grade from a C to a B.20 In the first yearcourses for civil and environmental engineering at the University of Colorado (CU) therespective BOK6,1 is presented to students in order to show that a diversity of knowledge, skills,and values are important, in the hopes that students will find some parts of the profession withwhich they can personally identify.A secondary goal of this research was to determine if there were significant differences in theattitudes toward sustainability of the first year students in the civil engineering course versus theenvironmental engineering course. My hypothesis was that a higher
-averageperformance for example, in a prerequisite course). In this case, a negative correla-tion between website use and final exam performance would not determine a negativeeffect. For this reason, Cramster website use was first compared with common mea-sures of students’ skills entering the course to determine whether a lack of preparationcaused a predisposition for website use. Scores on both the SAT Math test and thefinal exam of the prerequisite course were normalized; the Z score for a given student’sexam, s, is calculated by normalizing the deviation from the mean by the standarddeviation, or s−µ Zs = . (1
Engineering Classroom," European Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 34, pp. 29-45, 2009.5. M. Borrego and S. Cutler, "Constructive Alignment of Interdisciplinary Graduate Curriculum in Engineering and Science: An Analysis of Successful IGERT Proposals," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 99, pp. 355-369, 2010.6. M. Borrego and L. K. Newswander, "Definitions of Interdisciplinary Research: Toward Graduate-Level Interdisciplinary Learning Outcomes," Review of Higher Education, vol. 34, pp. 61-84, 2010.7. G. L. Downey, The machine in me: an anthropologist sits among computer engineers. New York: Routledge, 1998.8. G. Kunda, Engineering culture: control and commitment in a high-tech corporation. Philadelphia: Temple
Economic Sciences, Directorate for Social,Behavioral & Economic Systems of the National Science Foundation through grant #0832922. Page 22.510.9References 1. Bebeau, M. J. (2002) “The Defining Issues Test and the Four Component Model: contributions to professional education,” Journal of Moral Education, 31(3), 271 – 195. 2. Huff, C. & Frey, W. (2005) “Moral Pedagogy and Practical Ethics,” Science and Engineering Ethics, 11, 389 – 408. 3. Plemmons, D.K., Brody, S. A., & Kalichman, M. W. (2006) “Student Perceptions of the Effectiveness of Education in the Responsible Conduct of Research,” Science and Engineering
collaborators who share an interest in the development of ethical reasoning. Pleasecontact the authors for more information.AcknowledgementsThis research is funded by the National Science Foundation, CCLI grant # 0817531. Anyopinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those ofthe authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation. References1. NAE, Center for Engineering, Ethics and Society. (2011). [Web page] Retrieved from http://www.nae.edu/26187.aspx2. NSPE Code of Ethics. (2011). [Web page] Retrieved from http://www.nspe.org/Ethics/CodeofEthics/index.html3. Hartwell, S. (1995). Promoting moral development
traversing of an engineerthrough the world in this context can help define engineering. Bibliography 1. Dall’Alba, G., J. Sandberg. (2006). Unveiling Professional Development: A Critical Review of Stage Models. Review of Educational Research. 76(3). 383-412. 2. Dall’Alba, G. (2009). Learning Professional Ways of Being: Ambiguities of Becoming. Educational Philosophy and Theory. 41(1): 34-45. 3. Florman, S.(1976). The Existential Pleasures of Engineering. St. Martin’s Griffin. New York City. 4. Bonasso, S. G. (2001). Engineering, Leadership, and Integral Philosophy. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education & Practice, 127(1), 17. 5
experience with the team project. If you speak about thecontents of the focus group outside the group it is expected that you will not tell others whatindividual participants said. Please let us know what you think. 1. To start off this conversation, I’d like to know more about you: a. Please state your name, major(s), and minor(s) b. Please take a minute to explain the MTR project in your own words. c. List three things you learned (specifically) while working on this project. 2. In what way has participation in the MTR project shaped your global awareness and understanding (of other people and cultures). Please give an example. 3. You may consider yourself a
., Steadman, J. W., Tietjen, J. S., White, K. R., & Whitman, D. L. (2005). Using the fundamentals of engineering (FE) examination to assess academic programs. Clemson: National Council of Examiners for Engineering and Surveying.McNeel, S. P. (1994). College teaching and student moral development. In J. R. Rest & D. Narvâaez (Eds.), Moral development in the professions: Psychology and applied ethics (pp. 27-49). Hillsdale, N.J.: L. Erlbaum Associates.National Council of Examiners for Engineering and Surveying. (2008). Exam development procedures manual: Exam development, scoring, and general procedures: NCEES.Pascarella, E. T., & Terenzini, P. T. (2005). How college affects students : a third decade of
documents seemed veryuseful to evaluate any of the 3 skill areas for a pilot. However, an interesting idea surfacedregarding the team status meetings with the instructor in which an interview Q&A style could beused to gather sufficient evidence.A pilot was conducted in spring 2010 involving the capstone for Electrical Engineering as wellas Computer Engineering majors. The face-to-face meetings with the teams provided anexcellent opportunity to evaluate the skill levels. The instructor reported that each teamemployed all 3 skills at one or more point(s) during the semester. The results are shown in Table5 for all 6 teams. Good performance was observed in 2-3 teams for each skill; however, the bestteams were not always the same. No team
1 Harris, Jr., C. E., Davis, M., Pritchard, M. S., Rabins, M. J., “Engineering Ethics: What? Why? How? And When?” Journal of Engineering Education, ASEE, 4/19962 Abraham, S., Knies, A. D., Kukral, K. L., and Willis, T. E., “Experiences in Discussing Ethics with Undergraduate Engineers,” Journal of Engineering Education, ASEE, 10/19973 Freyne, S. F. and Hale, W. M., “A Preliminary Survey of Engineering Ethics Courses Nationwide,” Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, 20094 Hole, L. D., Radebaugh, D. W., and Soschinske, K. A., “Strategies for Industry and University Cooperation in Engineering Ethics Education,” Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, 20055 Davis, M. and
First-Year Engineers: The Struggle to Build a Solid Foundation”, 2005 ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings, 2005.4. Maara, R., Shen, D., Jonassen, D., Lo, J., Lohnai, V., “Fostering Engineering Ethics Problem Solving through Cognitive Flexibility Hypertext: An Aplication of Multiple Perspective, Making Connections and Crisscrossing”, AC2008-150, 2008 ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings, 2008.5. Wise, G., Keat, W., Balmer, R., Kosky, P., “Systematic approach to ethical decision making using matrices”, 38th Annual Frontiers in Education Conference, 2008.6. Freyne, S., Abulencia, J., Draper, P., “First Year Engineering Students’ Perceptions of Contemporary Ethical Issues”, AC2010-1257, 2010 ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings
://edition.cnn.com/W ORLD/9512/skorea_store/sentencing/index.html.45. Lee, M. S., C. S. Han, D. I. Kwak, and J. S. Lee. 1997. “Psychiatric Symptoms in Survivors of the Sampoong Incident.” Journal of the Korean Neuropsychiatric Association 36 (5): 841-9.46. Kim, Jung Bum, Seol Young Ryu, and Hyunnie Ahn. 2005. “A Review of Korean Mental Health Studies Related to Trauma and Disasters.” Psychiatry Investigations 2 (2): 22-30.47. “The Lake That Vanished.” 1981, December 1. Newsweek: 42.48. Nichols, Philip M. 2000. “The Myth of Anti-Bribery Laws as Transnational Intrusion.” Cornell International Law Journal 33: 627-55.49. Bryson, Chris. 1998. “The Donora Fluoride Fog: A Secret History of America’s W orst Air Pollution Disaster.” 13 (3). Earth Island
internal document, Adoption of the Engineer of 2020 Target Attributes.3 J. T. Kroll, Office of the Inspector General at NSF, oral presentation at NSF-CMMI Grantees Conference,Knoxville, TN, January 8, 2008, and personal communication, January 25, 2008.4 www.onlineethics.org5 Karl D. Stephan, “A Survey of Ethics-Related Instruction in U.S. Engineering Programs,” J. Eng. Ed., 10 459-64(1999).6 David Haws, “Ethics Instruction in Engineering Education: A (Mini) Meta-Analysis,” J. Eng. Ed., 4 223-9 (2001).7 L. P. Pojman and J. Fieser, Ethics: Discovering Right and Wrong (6th ed.), Wadsworth Publishing, 2008.8 Aristotle, Nichomachean Ethics (5thed.), translated by F. H. Peters, Barnes & Noble, 2004.9 S. Milgram, Obedience to Authority
. Krishnamurthi, M. Enhancing Student-Teacher Interaction in Internet-Based Courses. Proceedings of the 2000 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition. 5. Paterson, K. Student Perceptions of Internet-Based Learning Tools in Environmental Engineering Page 22.642.9 Education. Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 88, No. 3, pp. 295-304, July 1999.6. Starrett, S. A Beginner’s Approach to Teaching with the Internet. Proceedings of the 1996 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition.7. Wallace, D., Mutooni, P. A Comparative Evaluation of World Wide Web-Based and Classroom
., Cabral, M. T.,Frodeman, R., Hogenhuis, C., Heyd, T., Lemons, J., McKinstry, R., Lutes, M., Meulller, B., Domingos,J., Miguez, G., Munasinghe, M., Muylaert de Araujo, M. S., Nobre, C., Ott, K., Paavola, J., Pires deCampos, C., Pinguelli Rosa, L., Rosales, J., Rose, A., Wells, E., Westra, L., (2006), White Paper on theEthical Dimensions of Climate Change, The Collaborative Program on the Ethical Dimensions of ClimateChange, accessed from the Internet, January 2011.[3] Brown, D., 2002, American Heat, Ethical Problems with the United States Response to GlobalWarming, Roman and Littlefield, Lanham, Maryland Page 22.906.9Appendix ASTS 201 Ethics
teaching. In W. Wulf (Ed.), Emerging technologies and ethical issues in engineering: Papers from a workshop, October, 2003. Washington D.C: National Academic Press.10. Herkert, J.R. (2000). Engineering Education in the USA: Content, pedagogy and curriculum. European Journal of Engineering education, 25(4).11. Ohland, M. & Barry B., (2009) Applied Ethics in the Engineering, Health, Business, and Law Professions: A Comparison. Journal of Engineering Education, October 2009.12. Pritchard , Michael S., (2010). Teaching Engineering Ethics: A case study approach. Center for the study of Ethics in Society, Western Michigan University.13. Interview with Tinus (January 10, 2011).14. Svinicki, M. (2004). Learning and
). Preface. In F. Voss, D. N. Perkins & Segal (Eds.), Informal reasoning in education. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. 13. Nussbaum, E. M., & Schraw, G. (2007). Promoting argument-counterargument integration in students' writing. The Journal of Experimental Education, 76(1), 59-92. 14. Schworm, S., & Renkl, A. (2007). Learning argumentation skills through the use of prompts for self-explaining examples. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(2), 285-296. 15. Ross, B.H., & Spalding, T.L. (1994). Concepts and categories. In R.J. Sternberg (Ed.), Thinking and problem solving (pp. 119-148). New York: Academic Press. 16. Wittrock, M. (1990). Generative processes of comprehension. Educational