range of potential applicability to students at many different levels – from freshman thru tograduate students.The toolbox has only recently been developed, and will be used for the first time in Spring 2011in a senior-level Machine Learning course. Students will implement a genetic algorithm toenable a spider-like robot to learn how to walk. It is also intended to use the toolbox in a senior- Page 22.1516.8level Automatic Controls course where the students will stabilize a Segway-like mobile invertedpendulum. Further work will be required to assess the learning benefits of these curriculainnovations and to develop additional laboratory modules
and courses at Sinclair Community College. He has published on building’s thermal loads and has presented at the 2007 Energy Sustainability Conference in Long Beach, California, the 2009 Energy Sustainability Conference in San Francisco, California, the Renewable Energy & Energy Efficiency Workforce Education Conference in Hudson Valley, New York, the Sustainability Symposium in Eugene, Oregon, and others. Page 22.1298.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 Blueprint for Developing a Laboratory and Curriculum for Energy Efficiency, Renewable and
• determine the equivalent circuit of single- and three-phase transformers • apply the principles of electric machines and their control, • apply AC circuit analysis techniques to transmission lines and interconnected power networks.Virginia Electric Power Laboratory experiments based on principles of electric power engineeringTech17 Engineering Major Measurable Learning Objectives: Laboratory • develop models of transformers, motors, and transmission lines from experimental data, • apply models to
the Solar Decathlon spans 2 academic years. 2009 2010 2011 2012 Topic Fall Spring Summer Fall Spring Summer Fall Spring Proposal Conceptual DesignRecruit Project Team Detailed Design Construction Commissioning Competition Monitoring Event PlanningFundraising, PR, etc. A proposal for participation in the 2011 Solar Decathlon was submitted to the NationalRenewable Energy Laboratory in Fall of 2009. The proposal did not have much technical detail;it focused on the overall design philosophy, the structure of the team, and the resources availablefor completing the project. Based on that document
attendance in e-learning activities in blended-learning format is of equalimportance as face-to-face learning, if not more critical. The fast-growing pace ofblended-learning delivery trend necessitates the need for quantifying the impact ofdifferent levels of virtual attendance in e-learning activities on students’ performance.In blended-learning format, the e-learning activities include the following components: 1. Instructor-led threaded discussions 2. Internet-based e-books 3. Online or tele-Q & A sessions 4. Virtual document sharing 5. Internet-based Webiography 6. Web-based practice quizzes and tests 7. Web-based laboratory exercises 8. Web-based homework exercises 9. Web-based grade-books with feedback commentary areas
more value inreturn. But otherwise their objectives are roughly the same. However, the function that willsatisfy their needs might be somewhat different. For instance, for graduate students who havespecific knowledge needs, there may be a desire or need for more personalized attention fromfaculty or more specialized dedication of resources, such as laboratories in order to fill theirneeds.Professional StudentsProfessional students are generally interested in knowledge that will help them perform better atjobs that they currently hold. They may also be interested in obtaining certificates orcertifications that might increase their earning potentials or allow them to switch jobs. But ineither case, the practical nature of the additional
instructor’s personal expertise. For example, a teacher who had been working on measurements of different process variables chose to teach all sensors including different types of thermal, displacement, position, motion, pressure, flow and optical sensors. A different substitute teacher chose to teach all topics about motors. They still introduced some basic concepts about process control system, however, the author and the department think the course can benefit students more if the courseware is redesigned at a different level. There is a need to change the existing courseware and establish a comparatively fixed pattern. Laboratory needs to be changed to match up the course contents and teaching philosophy.To
Page 22.1361.4as a laboratory for students learning construction management12. Retrofits can later beinstrumented and monitored after installation, providing an opportunity for campus-basedresearch13. The remainder of this paper describes how such a project was implemented at a sitenear Lafayette College.Case StudyIn September 2004, the remains of Hurricane Ivan moved north through the mid-Atlantic region,resulting in widespread localized flooding. In eastern Pennsylvania, Ivan caused major damageto many small tributaries whose headwaters had become suburbanized over the previous 30years. Severe damage to streets and sidewalks occurred below an eroding stormwater channel(see Figure 1) that eventually discharges to Bushkill Creek, designated a
AC 2011-517: PROJECT-BASED RESIDENCY COURSE FOR ONLINEGRADUATE PROGRAMBimal P. Nepal, Texas A&M UniversityDr. F. Barry Lawrence, Texas A&M University Dr. Barry Lawrence holds the Leonard and Valerie Bruce Leadership Chair, the Program Director of the Industrial Distribution Program, Director of the Thomas and Joan Read Center, and Director of the Global Supply Chain Laboratory at Texas A&M University. As a faculty member of the Industrial Distribution Program he is involved in graduate, undergraduate, and professional continuing education teaching activities, funded research projects, publications and in- dustry presentations. His teaching activities surround classes in manufacturer/distributor
do not leave enough room for interdisciplinary/cross-disciplinary courses that could be important for the future careers of the graduates. Further, thelack of facilities such as appropriate laboratories and trained faculty could markedly hamper theinclusion of well-structured cross-disciplinary topics in the curriculum. Nevertheless, effortsshould be made to somehow incorporate such activities in the program of study 5, 7, &8. Forexample, students could be engaged in cross-disciplinary projects or case studies at the juniorand senior levels.The survey of pertinent literature suggests an increased need to equip computing professionalswith interdisciplinary/cross-disciplinary skills and some solutions have been offered to theproblem
, engaging discussions about entrepreneurship and engineeringdisciplines with graduate students, faculty, and invited speakers, an interactive chemistrylaboratory, campus tours, evening fireside chats with industry executives, nightly researchcollaborations, guided site visits to corporations such as Google and NASA, computerscience lectures and laboratories, and a hands-on collaborative research experience. Althoughall these elements work in tandem to make the LEAD-SEI experience phenomenal, the last Page 22.623.4two activities are critical elements that have helped to make LEAD-SEI a success at U.Va.Hence, we will give an in depth overview of these
appropriatebackground for the project, and that, after learning more details about the project, the studentsare still interested.Once a project is staffed with the necessary student(s), the project officially begins. This isinitiated by a kick-off meeting at the company. The MEDITEC program pays for the students totravel to the company to meet their technical leads, learn all relevant information about theproject, obtain necessary parts or equipment, and see the facilities.FinancesThe donation from each company is used to support the MEDITEC projects. The moneyallocated per project is nominally $5,000. Any funds that are not used remain in the MEDITECfund. This covers student stipends, site visits and travel, project materials, laboratory usagecosts, and
Engineering award, and the 1999 College of Engineering Outstanding Engineering Educator Award.Dr. Bill B Elmore, Mississippi State University Bill B. Elmore, Ph.D., P.E. is the Interim Director and Hunter Henry Chair for the Dave C. Swalm School of Chemical Engineering, Mississippi State University. His teaching areas include integrated freshman engineering and chemical engineering courses through the curriculum including ChE Problem Analysis and Unit Operations laboratories. His current research intersts include engineering education reform, enzyme-based catalytic reactions and bioengineering applied to renewable fuels and chemicals
developing and sharinglearning tools in the Renewable Energy field.The general educational outcomes of the EE program in UTPA are, concisely written: 1- usemath, 2- make experiments, 3- design equipments, 4- do team work, 5- communicate ideas, 6- beresponsible, 7- lifelong learning, and 8- computer literacy. Student's working on theseexperiments can develop further these abilities. Assessment of these outcomes will be done bythe inclusion of pertinent questions in Lab handouts.7- ConclusionGiven the current interest in the integration of solar technologies to the electric utilities, and thelack of teaching materials in this area, UTPA has developed six laboratory experiments on PVsolar technology topics. The experiments use software and hardware
ASEE.Daniel Lpez Gaxiola, Michigan Technological UniversityDaniel A. Crowl, Michigan Technological UniversityDavid W. Caspary, Michigan Technological University David Caspary is the Manager of Laboratory Facilities and Instructor in the Chemical Engineering De- partment at Michigan Technological University. He received a B.S. Engineering degree from Michigan Tech in 1982 and has also worked as a Training Specialist, Project Engineer, and Project Manager. He has over 25 years experience instructing and coordinating Unit Operations and Plant Operations Labora- tory, implementing distributed control and data acquisition systems, and designing pilot-scale processing equipment.Abhijit Mukherjee, Michigan TechDennis Desheng Meng
AC 2011-814: ASSESSING ENGINEERING STUDENT ATTITUDES ABOUTCOGNITION DUE TO PROJECT-BASED CURRICULUMDonald Plumlee, Boise State University Dr. Plumlee is certified as a Professional Engineer in the state of Idaho. He has spent the last ten years es- tablishing the Ceramic MEMS laboratory at Boise State University. Dr. Plumlee is involved in numerous projects developing micro-electro-mechanical devices in LTCC including an Ion Mobility Spectrometer and microfluidic/chemical micro-propulsion devices funded by NASA. Prior to arriving at Boise State University, Dr. Plumlee worked for Lockheed Martin Astronautics as a Mechanical Designer on struc- tural airframe components for several aerospace vehicles. He developed and
21 Publishing faulty data 50 “Need” to produce agreeable results 43 Page 22.106.7 The case study for the pretest (shown in its entirety in the appendix) describes a junior-level graduate student attempting to learn a new laboratory technique and in the processreproduce results previously published by a senior-level graduate student in the lab, his advisor,an undergraduate in the lab, and a collaborator from another institution. Conflict arises when thejunior-level graduate student cannot reproduce the results and believes that the senior-levelgraduate student
, for example that by graduation students must know and canapply basic principles of thermodynamics.At graduation, undergraduate students in mechanical engineering should be able to: 1. Apply knowledge of physics, mathematics, and engineering in their writing 2. Record and analyze activity related to laboratories and design projects 3. Visually represent designs and explain salient features of a part or concept 4. Synthesize and summarize key points 5. Strategize and demonstrate engineering project metrics such as productivity, costs and time to completion 6. Analyze the audience and create a document that meets the needs of the audience 7. Represent themselves professionally 8. Explain, discuss, and demonstrate
. (Ed.) (2000). Calculus Renewal: Issues for undergraduate mathematics education in the next decade. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers., 200117. Manseur, Z., Ieta, A., and Manseur, R. (2010). Modern Mathematics Requirements in a Developing Engineering Program. Proceedings, ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition.18. Ganter 2004 Page 22.153.919. Hestenes, D., Wells, M., & Swackhamer, G. (1992). Force concept inventory. The Physics Teacher, 30(3): 141- 151.20. Thornton, R., & Sokoloff, D. (1990). Learning motion concepts using real-time, microcomputer-based laboratory tools. American Journal of Physics
internet based and half laboratory based 4. The flexibilities afforded by an on-linecourse are well-suited to many students as they can be made to fit with their work schedules andfamily commitments. It is important to point out this portion is asynchronous, but is paced on aweek-by-week basis. Our college is trying to minimize student trips to campus. This hybridapproach fits well with that goal, and also reduces required carbon emissions inherently bydesign. The faculty, however, felt that a hands-on approach is too important to abandon. They are notwilling to relinquish personal contact, nor direct observations of the students and criticalinstructor-student interactions. Discussions about making “marathon” laboratory sessions once amonth
Program Curriculum (starting from fall 2010):The Program’s aim is to meet the educational objectives and outcomes and to educate graduatesthat are well-rounded to enter the profession or to pursue graduate studies. This is achievedthrough a well-balanced set of courses to ensure the strength needed in basic science andengineering, basic architectural engineering, hands-on experience through laboratory andprojects, humanities and social sciences, senior level architectural engineering professionalexperience and major design experience through senior-level courses and the capstone designcourse. The courses required are versatile. Each course has a set of objectives that focuses onlearning the materials needed to ensure the level of competency
Recommendation: Business topics, automation/controls, product design, and lean manufacturing should be priorities for curriculum changes.5. Education MethodsThe process of delivering a curriculum is addressed in Table 6. There were clear responses thatcooperative education, internships, laboratories, and project work are very high priorities. This isa clear message that ‘hands-on’ education is a very high priority. As would be expected there aremismatches in priorities between academics and manufacturers.Table 6 - Education Method Priorities Top Second Manufacturing Academic Priority Priority Priority PriorityCertifications 7
closeone-on-one working relationships between research scientists and participating teachers. EachRET experience was structured to include the following components:1) Collaborative development of agenda, expectations, and goals for the specific research project and overall laboratory experience.2) Safety training and an overview of the laboratory facilities and equipment.3) Hands-on experiences in current laboratory techniques and studies being performed by scientists, which could lead to integration of cutting-edge science into inquiry-based learning. Page 22.1552.54) Focused research project with mentor scientist.5) Regular meetings with the
graduatestudents teaching in the undergraduate program. Also, the class size for lecture and laboratorysections are intentionally kept small, even during the first-year, in order to be consistent with themission of the School. Laboratory sections are geared to be between ten and fifteen students.Lifelong learning in the curriculum. A rubric was developed to assess students on thedemonstration of knowledge and awareness of lifelong learning, of application of skillsconsistent with, and of behavior associated with someone who is a lifelong learner. Performanceindicators constituting evidence that lifelong learning is occurring included: ● recognition of the need for further education and self-improvement; ● recognition of the necessity of continuing
populations. Participating teachers attend a ten day,six hour per day summer workshop, that is offered simultaneous to the graduate student summersession, and this workshop addresses the applications of mathematics and science to engineering.Joint sessions are held during the summer session among graduate students and teachers,allowing for collaboration and brainstorming on lesson plans that will be implemented during theacademic year. The bond between the graduate students and the teachers begins to developduring the summer and is strengthened throughout the academic year. These workshops aretaught in collaboration with expert district teachers, university faculty, and engineers andscientists from a local national laboratory. Each workshop further
immerseundergraduate students in the research community by giving them a full year of lab experiencethat also offers a global perspective on research challenges and opportunities in the field ofbiomedical engineering. It is our hope that this will inspire students not only to enter a graduateprogram, but also to seek a program with an international component.An additional, and equally important, goal of CURE is to build relationships between personnelin the three collaborating institutions by linking the collaborators and their work with each otherthrough these students. We conceptualized the participating student as a resource that would beshared by the collaborating laboratories and, thus, would be prepared by the Georgia TechTech/Emory PIs and mentors to
AC 2011-1650: STEM PROFESSIONALS WITH CLASSSharon F. Bendall, San Diego State University, Center for Research in Mathematics and Science Education Sharon Bendall started her career as a professional physicist at IBM’s T.J. Watson Laboratory but early on switched her focus to physics education. She is an Adjunct Faculty member of the San Diego State University Physics Department and a Senior Scientist in SDSU’s Center for Research in Mathematics and Science Education. As a nationally recognized materials developer and leader of professional develop- ment, she has been the PI or co-PI on many NSF grants in science. She has developed and implemented numerous content and pedagogical workshops for K-12 teachers, and is a
Department at California Polytechnic State Uni- versity in San Luis Obispo. Prior to joining the faculty at Cal Poly in 2006, he taught for seven years at the United States Air Force Academy and worked for four years in the Air Force Research Laboratories. Research interests include active learning and engineering education, spatial disorientation, rehabilitation engineering, sports biomechanics, and aerospace physiology. He worked on a team that developed the Dynamics Concept Inventory and is currently collaborating on a grant to develop and assess Model Elic- iting Activities in engineering. Brian was the 2008-2010 ASEE Zone IV Chair and serves as Cal Poly’s ASEE Campus Representative.Lynne A Slivovsky
coming decade is going to have to become intelligent also. That requires homenetworking and home integration. Moreover, as plug in electric vehicles (PEVs) become morenumerous, only an intelligent grid can support their use by the general population. Again, thisbrings a new set of electronics based technologies into the picture.Along these same lines are e-health care initiatives that are waiting in the wings. e-health caresystems are beginning to come out of the laboratory and also into the public eye as the countrycontemplates what to do about soaring healthcare costs and the impending retirement of thebaby-boomer generation. As with the smart grid, the enabling technology of e-health care issensor network technology17. Some of the proposed e
Journal cover. She is an active men- tor of undergraduate researchers and served as co-PI on an NSF REU site. Research within her Medical micro-Device Engineering Research Laboratory (M.D. ERL) also inspires the development of Desktop Experiment Modules (DEMos) for use in chemical engineering classrooms or as outreach activities in area schools. Adrienne has been an active member of ASEE’s WIED, ChED, and NEE leadership teams since 2003.Donald P. Visco, Tennessee Technological UniversitySusan M. Montgomery, University of Michigan Susan Montgomery is Lecturer IV and program advisor in Chemical Engineering at the University of Michigan. She also serves as ASEE campus representative. She earned a BSEChE from the