interactions that influence under-represented students’ decisions to enter and persist in engineering.Research and Education GoalsThe specific goals of this NSF CAREER-funded project are to (1) build a conceptual model forunderstanding how engineering undergraduates develop, access and activate social capital inmaking academic and career decisions, (2) identify and characterize the potentially distinctmechanisms by which under-represented students utilize social ties that link them to resourcesrelated to engineering studies and (3) implement an education plan that provides research-to-practice training for university engineering outreach, recruitment, and retention practitionersusing webinars and workshops as learning forums.Theoretical FrameworkThe
Field Trip Why an Ed Plan Ed Plan2-2:20 pm Counseling OR Counseling OR Education Plan? Learning Styles Math Anxiety Time2:20-2:30 Signups for Workshop Managementpm Work Sessions2:30-3:30 Individual Ed Individual Ed Individual Edpm Plan Counseling Plan Counseling Plan Counseling[Optional] Skills Counseling Skills Counseling Skills Counseling Week 2 June 15 June 16 June 17 June 18
. Many students come to the College directly afterhigh school, while others bring a variety of living and work experiences to their studies. The Page 22.1377.2average age ranges from 25 years old in the day classes to approximately 31 years old in theevening courses. Some students take conventional college programs, planning to transfer to afour-year institution after graduation, while other students sign up for associate degree orcertificate programs leading directly to employment in specialized career fields. Also,significant numbers of students at NECC enroll in developmental and second language coursesto upgrade their skill sets before pursuing
useful if he had started with a better understandingof the parts they would be using and how they fit together. This comment points out apossible challenge facing these students when using their notebooks to facilitate ideageneration: the students did not know enough to draw detailed sketches. However, oncethey had enough familiarity with the VEX robotics kits to create useful sketches of theirdesign plans, they were no longer making frequent notebook entries.The students’ notebook entries align with the interviews by revealing the challenge withmaking detailed drawings as well as the emphasis on the early part of the design process.First, we see that the entries were rather sparse both in content and count. Donald’snotebook exemplifies this
influenced early by the thrill of engineering, which can last well into their college years.Over the past three years 320 grandparents and elementary students have specifically taken partin the Department of Mechanical Engineering’s efforts in bringing engineering to the young. Thebelief in creating a program that is both educational and fun was critical when planning anactivity for 8-12 year olds and their grandparents. The participants are engaged in learning aboutmechanical engineering, teamwork, and tower building. Details concerning the planning of theactivity, the educational value, the work that is accomplished by the participants; impressions ofthe faculty, staff, and graduate students; and plans for the future will be presented
and grouptutoring sessions as well as personal, professional and academic mentoring. Four of our six casestudy institutions also offered “living and learning” communities that used an all-inclusiveapproach to support student retention. For this panel session, we also examined if engineering seniors’ plans to work in oroutside of an engineering profession differed by gender and race/ethnicity. The P2P surveycontains three measures for this analysis, tapping students’ expectations that after graduationthey will: 1) be a practicing engineer in industry, government, or non-profit organization; 2)work in engineering management or sales; and 3) work outside engineering. We found thatwomen students were less likely than men to plan to be a
and grouptutoring sessions as well as personal, professional and academic mentoring. Four of our six casestudy institutions also offered “living and learning” communities that used an all-inclusiveapproach to support student retention. For this panel session, we also examined if engineering seniors’ plans to work in oroutside of an engineering profession differed by gender and race/ethnicity. The P2P surveycontains three measures for this analysis, tapping students’ expectations that after graduationthey will: 1) be a practicing engineer in industry, government, or non-profit organization; 2)work in engineering management or sales; and 3) work outside engineering. We found thatwomen students were less likely than men to plan to be a
of narrative and evidence.Students complete the assignments in section one, plus one of the two other portfoliocomponents.Portfolio Components: 1. Assignments: i. Graduate Attributes Self-Assessment ii. Work Term Goal Setting and Action Plan Exercise iii. Monthly EIT records iv. Daily Logbook v. Supervisors Performance Appraisal vi. Career Planning Exercise 2. Narrative: Students will answer a series of questions related to each learning outcome. Or, 3. Technical Report combined with an annotated work sample demonstrating significant advancement with one attribute, can be in lieu of the narrative questions for one work
improvement in skills targeted in the students’ Individualized Page 22.1.2Education Plans (IEPs) – two of which are skills of written and oral communication andcollaboration.It is important to know that, in New Jersey, special needs teachers are expected to follow thestate core curriculum content standards through the general education curriculum, and thatspecial needs students take the same tests as the regular population. The state has a goal ofincreasing teachers’ awareness of the growing emphasis on 21st century skills in teaching andlearning and on providing strategies to facilitate student achievement of these skills in classroomsettings.NJ Core
femalefaculty, through career coaching. The first coaching cohort of female post-tenure STEM facultybegan in the spring of 2010. Initial reaction was positive and the cohort decided to continue in2010 - 11. Due to popular demand, a second cohort was also established in fall 2010. This paperwill discuss the motivation, implementation, initial assessment, and future plans of the CareerCoaching Cohorts. Evaluation data and participant demographics will be presented.IntroductionWomen have been present in the academy for years, but their numbers remain stunningly low.Much work has been done to increase the number of female professors, especially in the STEMdisciplines where their numbers are the lowest, but the increases have been steady but slow.3Also
Implementation Team meetings and correctiveactions are produced and implemented in the key deliverables of the project. The currentsituation of Art2STEM and the recent results of the project’s progress and evaluation arehighlighted in this paper.2. BackgroundStarting in 2006 MNPS began plans to restructure its comprehensive high schools into wall-to-wall academies. As planning and implementation proceeded those who were leading the effortdiscovered an extremely low level of interest among middle school students to participate inSTEM-related career academies in high school, while interest in other career academies like artsand entertainment was extremely high, especially among girls. In general concept, the MNPSacademies are small schools within a larger
S-STEM funding has influenced educational practices in the ERE department.The lessons learned from SLS program have informed the ERE department Diversity andRetention Plan required by the new university accreditation process, whose purpose is to increaseretention of diverse students in all majors. One part of the plan that was informed by the SLSproject is the implementation of a peer mentoring program for first year engineering (ERE)students. The peer mentoring program was started due to the SLS project outcomes thatindicated the importance of peer mentoring. Assessment of the new peer mentoring program isnot yet complete. In addition, based on outcomes from the SLS project, the ERE department isencouraging the university to implement
AC 2011-275: STUDENT REFLECTION IN EXPERIENTIAL LEARNINGPROJECTSSwaminathan Balachandran, University of Wisconsin - Platteville Bala has more than 35 years of teaching, five years of industrial and about 10,000 hours of consulting experience. He is a fellow of IIE and senior member of SME, ASQ, APICS, HFES, INFORMS, INFOMS, ASEE, and IIE. He is a life member of Phi Kappa Phi, Alpha Pi Mu, and SME. He was the chair of the Department of Industrial Engineering at UW Platteville from 1986 to 1995, established the IE laboratory facilities and secured the accreditation of the program by EAC of ABET in 1987 and 1993. He serves on the editorial board of the International Journal of Production Planning and control. He is a
expose students to CAD/CAM technology in thecurriculum. All ET students with the exception of the Electronics program are required to take anintroductory CAD class (ETEC 113) and a manufacturing processes course (ETEC 246). Theseare new additions to the curriculum (246 will be taught for the first time in Fall 2011) replacingthree other courses in an effort to consolidate instruction and reduce resource requirements.Students are introduced to feature-based parametric modeling and generative drafting usingCATIA in ETEC 113. They will receive additional exposure in ETEC 246 where they arerequired to use CATIA in their project to model and generate tool paths to water-jet cut a sheetmetal component. There are also plans in the near future to
Page 22.1563.4students who listed a given skill as “Least Important” before and after the course. Of all the skills, only “Brainstorming” (before= 0%; after= 16%) had a statistically significant difference inpercentages (p=0.0033). Communicating Understanding Problem Brainstorming Prototyping Goal Setting Iterating Creativity Understanding POV Synthesizing Visualizing SeekingInfo Testing TradeOffs Planning Evaluating Identifying Constraints Decisions
implement reflects themany ways engineer take designs from ideas to reality. Many engineers do build designs using abroad array of techniques. Perhaps one of the biggest differences between engineeringdisciplines is the specialized methods and technologies they use to implement designs. Howeversome engineers implement ideas through manipulation of information, such as designingcomputer software or producing plans. Here the real value is the information in the blueprint orcode, not the medium (paper or magnetic disk) that contains the information. Another option forimplementing a design is to contract another company to build it. In this case the engineer workswith the company to ensure the work is done properly.The fourth step of the engineering
addressed with severaltactics that are described and assessed in this paper.Course DescriptionHistorically, civil engineers have planned and designed water infrastructure to prevent floods,supply water, collect stormwater and wastewater, generate hydropower, and manage waterways.Recently, challenges facing water resources projects have intensified and diversified becausegrowing metropolitan populations, aging infrastructure, changing climate, improved awarenessof environmental impacts, and policy have become much more nuanced and complex. Nowhereis this more evident than in the western United States, particularly in that region served by theColorado River. In essence, even if the skills, technologies, and solutions available to waterresources
AC 2011-1528: A NATIONWIDE EFFORT TO IMPROVE TRANSPORTA-TION ENGINEERING EDUCATIONRhonda K Young, University of Wyoming Rhonda Young is an associate professor in the Department of Civil and Architectural Engineering at the University of Wyoming specializing in the transportation field. Rhonda is a registered professional engineering and has been in academics for nine years after working as a transportation consultant for over ten years. Within transportation her focus areas are trasnportation planning and rural intelligent transportation systems.Kristen L. Sanford Bernhardt, Lafayette CollegeSteven W. Beyerlein, University of Idaho, Moscow Dr. Beyerlein is a professor of Mechanical Engineering at the University of
technical research related to the GSSE project.2. Planning the STESE Course and ProgramIn its initial planning stages, the new program relied heavily on other existing strengths at CSUin international development, global sustainability, and an established record of transforminglaboratory research into innovative startup endeavors to benefit the human condition on a globalscale. Specifically, these areas include: A burgeoning undergraduate entrepreneurship curriculum within the College of Business, The newly developed School of Global Environmental Sustainability and The Global Innovation Center (GIC) for Energy, Environment and Health.Each of these resources is discussed briefly below.Entrepreneurship Curriculum within the College of
AC 2011-2251: ”TUNING” ENGINEERING PROGRAMS IN THE CON-TEXT OF ABET ACCREDITATIONMary Eileen Smith, Ph.D., Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board Mary E. Smith has been employed with the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board since 1987 and now serves as Assistant Deputy Commissioner for Academic Planning and Policy. She is responsible for the administration and management of matters related to the Board’s higher education academic planning and policy functions, and she provides leadership on key projects, reports, and studies that cut across divisions of the agency. She has taught at The University of Texas at Austin, and she currently is an Adjunct Assistant Professor of Communication at St. Edward’s
in engineering careers, but it is also strongly focused on a particularfive step design sequence, “Ask, Imagine, Plan, Create, Improve.”8 Although aspects of what isput forward as design are included in each of the curricula, the interpretations and approacheswere found to be quite different. Clearly, a universal concept of engineering design may not beforthcoming, but the breadth of interpretations for just this aspect of the curricula demonstratesthe disparate status of K-12 engineering education and curricula that include engineering design.In their findings and recommendations, the NAE/NRC Committee described the development ofsystematic linkages between engineering design and scientific inquiry and furthermore, positedthese connections
architects, mechanical and structuralengineers, lighting designers and specialist simulation modelers contribute to anintegrated approach. The integrated approach may involve the use of local weatherconditions, such as wind-driven ventilation and daylighting, as well as the characteristicsof the building shape, materials and space planning needs.In this paper, a methodology presented to our students in the framework of this course ispresented. This methodology is based on using actual buildings, where local weatherconditions as well as engineering considerations and architecture are used in an integratedapproach to achieve a successful design.We discuss the course program from the students’ point of view, and the experienceearned in design
the tenure process at a teaching-based institution can use this article as aguide to create a portfolio/development plan that will contain the relevant information to satisfythe rank and tenure requirements at their institution. It is advised that the new faculty memberreviews in a yearly basis the contents of his/hers development plan with the department chair toobtain feedback and ensure a continuous progress towards advancement. By compiling thisinformation in a yearly basis, the new faculty member will be able to prepare his/hers tenure andrank application in a painless and smooth manner.2 Rank and Tenure Requirements before year 2000General requirements for rank and tenure at Gannon University consist of satisfying a set ofcategories
3 hours 6 credit hrs Program Requirements 64 credit hrsTable 1: Advanced Manufacturing Program, Northwest Michigan College 2010 Degree Page 22.10.3PlanSouth Texas Technical CollegesSouth Texas College (McAllen): The precision manufacturing technology program provides anenvironment to develop technical skills that are highly marketable to the South Texas industries.The STC degree plan requires 69 credit hours for graduation in the following areas: 16 credithours of general education, 30 credit hours or nine classes related
considerations such as size,speed, safety, and functionality of the robot are discussed, and robot building componentsincluding sensors, actuators, processing, communicating, and power supply are provided. Thelaboratory module is built on the 3D Webots simulation platform. Path planning, collisionavoidance, and other robot navigation methods are introduced to acquaint bio-medicalengineering students with modern robotic control techniques.IntroductionMicro/nano-robots for biomedical applications are an emerging area that has receivedadvancement during the last decade. Though books/textbooks exist in nanotechnology, thereare a growing number of articles appearing in journals and conference proceedings inbiomedical micro/nano-robotics. Medical robotics has
engineeringdisciplines, including mechanical, electrical, fire protection, and others. The architecturalengineers are responsible for the different systems within a building, structure, or complex.Architectural engineers focus several areas, including: the structural integrity of buildings; thedesign and analysis of heating, ventilating and air conditioning systems; efficiency and design ofplumbing, safety and fire protection and electrical systems; acoustic and lighting planning, andenergy conservation.In this paper, our objective is to present the new curriculum at University of Wyoming thatfocuses on several disciplines: HVAC systems design, energy, plumbing, fire protection andbuilding electricity. This multidisciplinary program focuses on the integration
Page 22.1540.3exchanged information via Scholar and email about their own programs relative to the team’sassignment. The teams are at various stages of developing and implementing work plans. Theprogress and plans of the various teams are described in the following paragraphs.Activity 1. Common Threads of the Biosystems Engineering Discipline The core concepts, or threads, of BE are variously understood by those within thediscipline, but have never been unequivocally defined due to the comparative youth of thediscipline. This makes communication and teaching difficult compared to other well establishedengineering subjects. The Atlantis POMSEBES project and Erasmus Network “ERABEE” haveworked towards defining a core curriculum for the
c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 The Land Development Design InitiativeIntroduction and BackgroundA large team of professional engineers has rallied around a call for participation in thedevelopment of a new emphasis in land development design within a Department of Civil andEnvironmental Engineering (CEE) at a major land-grant institution. Land development design isthe process of planning, design, and construction of infrastructure and facilities for residential,commercial, industrial, institutional, recreational, and government projects. Land developmentengineers must have strong knowledge about comprehensive plans, zoning, conceptual design, aswell as the engineering background in water resources
focusing on teamwork.Course Details – InstructorsThe TOP method was applied to the Construction Scheduling and Project Control course. Inorder to understand the suitability of TOP for this course, the course description is providedbelow:Construction Scheduling and Project Control ―provides a discussion on the theories, principles,and techniques of construction planning and scheduling with an emphasis on time management,costs, and resources through the preparation and analysis of network schedules.‖The objectives of student leaning for this course include: (1) understanding and describing theprocess of construction project planning, scheduling and control, and ethical issues involved inthe construction scheduling process, (2) developing a Gantt
in May of 2010. Planning and analysis was completed in phase I,design and implementation in phase II, and documentation and students’ assessment in phase III. Page 22.1300.2 Figure 1. A model of smart grid in electrical distribution systemPhase I: Planning and AnalysisInitially, each team member worked on individual research on the concepts of smart grid itspurpose. Later on, a decision was made as to what the team wanted to demonstrate with theproject. The decision was made to show specifically how smart meters would work and help infault detection as well as saving money by removing the need for meter readers to read the