course: 1) each instructor represents a unique engineeringdiscipline and collectively the team provides a foundation for a broad introductory curriculum,2) each instructor is physically located at a different regional campus, mimicking thegeographical dispersion of students and supporting student learning and engagement, and3) together, the interplay of the multi-disciplinary, geographically dispersed instructor teamrealistically depicts today’s engineering workplace and promotes the field as a viable,meaningful career choice through open discussion and learner discovery. Results from studentcourse evaluations and surveys, and instructor reflections are used to comment on and assess thebasic effectiveness of the instructional approach.Team
AC 2011-696: MEASURING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF TEAM-BASEDSTEM PROJECT LEARNING AMONG HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS ANDTEACHERSFelicia Chong, Michigan Technological UniversityDouglas E. Oppliger, Michigan Technological University Mr. Oppliger is a professional engineer and a lecturer in the Engineering Fundamentals department at Michigan Technological University. He is the director of the High School Enterprise program which has a mission to increase the numbers of students pursuing post-secondary degrees and careers in STEM fields. At its core, this program supports K-12 teachers who are leading teams of students in long-term STEM projects. This work is the latest in Oppliger’s history of working in K-12 STEM areas. For the past 10
Research Design. Research Design and Analysis Consultation, CareerWISE.Bianca L. Bernstein, Arizona State University Professor, Counseling Psychology, Women and Gender Studies Principal Investigator, CareerWISE re- search program Page 22.660.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 Exaggerating the typical and stereotyping the differences: Isolation experienced by women in STEM doctoral programsAbstractThis paper describes the initial results of a qualitative, longitudinal study designed to understandhow career and educational choices unfold for women in
AC 2011-700: UNDERWATER ROVS IN PRE-COLLEGE EDUCATION:UNIVERSITY-K12 PARTNERSHIPS THAT GO BEYOND THE COMPE-TITIONSDouglas E. Oppliger, Michigan Technological University Mr. Oppliger is a professional engineer and a lecturer in the Engineering Fundamentals department at Michigan Technological University. He is the director of the High School Enterprise program which has a mission to increase the numbers of students pursuing post-secondary degrees and careers in STEM fields. At its core, this program supports K-12 teachers who are leading teams of students in long-term STEM projects. This work is the latest in Oppliger’s history of working in K-12 STEM areas. For the past 10 years he has developed and taught first
, the SHPE Educator of the Year 2005, and the National En- gineering Award in 2003, the highest honor given by AAES. In 2002 she was named the Distinguished Engineering Educator by the Society of Women Engineers. Her awards are based on her mentoring of students, especially women and underrepresented minority students, and her research in the areas of re- cruitment and retention. A SWE and ASEE Fellow, she is a frequent speaker on career opportunities and diversity in engineering.Dr. Armando A. Rodriguez, Arizona State University ARMANDO A. RODRIGUEZ is the co-PI of the NSF METSTEP grant to work with non-metropolitan community colleges to produce more engineers, especially female and underrepresented minority engi
class without aninstructor and the EPICS Program scrambling to fill that slot. By developing the partnershipwith the company’s management and the EPICS Program, we are able to work together toreplace employees as they move through their careers and maintain the academic support duringthe school year. Some corporate volunteers cannot commit to a weekly meeting and they serve as designreviewers. Twice each semester, every EPICS team conducts a design review, at the midpointand end of the semester. Corporate representatives serve as the design reviewers for the teamsand provide valuable feedback to the students. Each design reviewer is given training andstandardized forms to provide feedback and the teams are scheduled so that a reviewer
definition of quantitative and precise metricsthat reflect changes in the program. A second is the data collection and the action definitions thatshould minimize or, at least, allow the resolution of interdependencies and correlations amongthem. While these form an intellectually interesting modeling and feedback problem, one mustalso be prepared to accommodate some faculty resistance, indifference, or simply lack of time toperform such tasks. Viewing automation and consistency as a key for the success of continuousimprovement, we have implemented this feedback process for the last four years and here wepresent some of our experiences.1. IntroductionObjective and meaningful evaluation of student performance and career success is a complicatedproblem
multiple sources forenergy and climate data (DOE, NASA, NOAA, etc.), simulation results from global climatemodels, and results from their own simulations utilizing climate models (EdGCM). Extensiveuse of MS Excel and Matlab are required for processing and analysis of the large data sets. Theimpacts of the course on the students were assessed with a combination of quantitative andqualitative approaches. Substantial quantitative gains were made in the students’ climate literacy,especially in knowledge areas. Students also showed gains in their self-reported feelings thatthey could solve a new problem or tackle a challenge, were good at interpreting charts andgraphs and manipulating databases, and were interested in pursuing a career in science
of achievement,persistence, direction, and self-efficacy2-4; all are important in the field of engineering educationas many students, especially underrepresented minorities, leave before reaching their goal ofgraduating with an engineering degree.5 Because goal setting and monitoring involve reflection,both introspective and prospective, they can be difficult for engineering students to engage insince students are often uncomfortable with, and even resistant to, reflective activities. 6-8However, we observed that students began to engage in goal setting and monitoring as naturalby-products of the development of a professional portfolio. The professional portfolio is ademonstration of students’ preparation for an engineering career, and thus
Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) where women make up 51% of its science undergraduates and 35% of its engineering undergraduates. For women to participate to their full potential across all science and engineering fields, they must see a career path that allows them to reach their full intellectual potential. Much remains to be done to achieve that goal.”6In 2004, the Board of the InterAcademy Council formed an Advisory Panel on Women for Science. In 2007,the study Women for Science: An Advisory Report7, funded by L’Oreal Paris, the Netherlands Ministry ofEducation, the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation and an anonymous donor, was prepared by the InterAcademyCouncil.It shows the concern is global, stating: “The low representation of women
top 5% engineering teacher for 2009-2010. She received the WEPAN Engineering Educator Award 2009, ASEE Minorities Award 2006, the SHPE Educator of the Year 2005, and the National En- gineering Award in 2003, the highest honor given by AAES. In 2002 she was named the Distinguished Engineering Educator by the Society of Women Engineers. Her awards are based on her mentoring of students, especially women and underrepresented minority students, and her research in the areas of re- cruitment and retention. A SWE and ASEE Fellow, she is a frequent speaker on career opportunities and diversity in engineering.Anita Grierson, Arizona State UniversityDr. Rakesh Pangasa, Arizona Western College PAKESH PANGASA is the PI of the
- sity. She obtained a B.S. in mathematics from Spelman College, a M.S. in industrial engineering from the University of Alabama, and a Ph.D. in Leadership and Policy Studies from Peabody College of Vanderbilt University. Teaching interests relate to the professional development of graduate engineering students and to leadership, policy, and change in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics education. Pri- mary research projects explore the preparation of engineering doctoral students for careers in academia and industry and the development of engineering education assessment tools. She is a NSF Faculty Early Career (CAREER) award winner and is a recipient of a Presidential Early Career Award for Scientists and
and research, motivation, and new and junior faculty development. She also studies gender issues in the STEM disciplines.Susan M. Lord, University of San Diego Susan M. Lord received a B.S. from Cornell University and the M.S. and Ph.D. from Stanford Univer- sity. She is currently Professor and Coordinator of Electrical Engineering at the University of San Diego. Her teaching and research interests include electronics, optoelectronics, materials science, first year engi- neering courses, feminist and liberative pedagogies, and student autonomy. Dr. Lord served as General Co-Chair of the 2006 Frontiers in Education Conference. She has been awarded NSF CAREER and ILI grants. She is currently working on a
and research, motivation, and new and junior faculty development. She also studies gender issues in the STEM disciplines.Dr. Susan M. Lord, University of San Diego Susan M. Lord received a B.S. from Cornell University and the M.S. and Ph.D. from Stanford Univer- sity. She is currently Professor and Coordinator of Electrical Engineering at the University of San Diego. Her teaching and research interests include electronics, optoelectronics, materials science, first year engi- neering courses, feminist and liberative pedagogies, and student autonomy. Dr. Lord served as General Co-Chair of the 2006 Frontiers in Education Conference. She has been awarded NSF CAREER and ILI grants. She is currently working on a
todemonstrate students the link between the scientific principles and their engineering applications.The course is team taught by faculty from various engineering and technology disciplines toprovide students experience related to multiple fields to help them identify their career discipline.Students work in groups to build devices and test them. Student evaluations indicate a marked increase in learning and comprehension ofscientific principles and engineering concepts. The paper will discuss the design anddevelopment effort that have gone into creating the PBL kits that were developed related toMarine and Maritime industry. It will also discuss implementation within the course and resultsfrom pre and post surveys from students.1. Research on
attributes. The learningoutcomes for the first work term are for students to be able to: A. Demonstrate their progress with developing four graduate attributes B. Identify and describe the aspects of their work term that contributed to, and detracted from, their progress with the selected attributes C. Summarize how the attributes connect with: 1. the EIT program 2. logbook keeping Page 22.815.3 3. performance feedback 4. career planningTo achieve these goals, students create a ‘learning portfolio’ during each work term thatdemonstrates their learning accomplishments through a combination
Abstract A two semester senior level capstone design course has been restructured (Senior Design I and II) in response to the outcomes defined by the industry to assure job ready engineers and outcomes set by the academicians to assure math and science based fundamentals. The restructuring purpose was also to align the course outcomes with the college mission of graduating „Career- Ready‟ engineers. The department offers programs in civil engineering and construction engineering. Both program curriculums require a two semester course on a comprehensive design application. The courses are designed to meet specific ABET outcomes. Also to meet an additional program outcome of: students are able to explain
in Electrical Engineering from Morgan State University and is presently working on his Doctorate Degree in Math Education. Mr. Martin has worked at NASA Goddard Space Flight Center and the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) as a Power System Engineer. He has taught high school Mathematics in the Baltimore City Public School System as well as Mathematics at several colleges and universities. Just before coming to BDJ, Mr. Martin worked for the Maryland State Department of Education as a Regional Coordinator for Career and Technology Education, where he assisted many local school systems with their implementation and management of pre-engineering and technology programs.Maisha Drew, Innovative STEM Foundation
AC 2011-934: IPHONE ENTREPRENEURSHIP CLASS: BRIDGING THEGAP BETWEEN ENGINEERING AND BUSINESS TO CREATE AN EN-TREPRENEURIAL CULTUREGerald Nelson, Mississippi State University Gerald Nelson is an Industrial Engineering graduate of Mississippi State University who later went on to receive his MBA. Nelson’s career includes former positions as Plant Manager, Trinity Industries; Presi- dent and Chief Operating Officer of the Wear Resistance Group of Thermadyne Industries, Inc.; Executive Vice President of Operations, Viasystems Group, Inc.; and Chief Operating Officer of Deka Medical, Inc. In 2006, Nelson assumed responsibility as Director for the Thad Cochran Endowment for Entrepreneur- ship, which fosters funds and
, online content with interactive animations, hands onactivities, an online mathematical simulation and culminates with the students designing,constructing, testing, evaluating and reporting on their design solution. The program bridgesmath and science content with engineering to better prepare students to pursue engineering ortechnology related careers. Between 2003 and 2007 there has been a decline of enrollments inengineering programs1, in addition women and minorities are underrepresented in the scienceand engineering workforce2, so programs with the same goals as INSPIRES help expose studentsto careers that involve studying science or engineering. The INSPIRES curriculum is designedto specifically target three Standards for Technology
AC 2011-110: UNDERGRADUATE DESIGN: DESIGN OF A REUSABLESTIR FRICTION WELDING TOOLFredrick A. Nitterright, Pennsylvania State Erie, The Behrend College Mr. Fred Nitterright is a lecturer in engineering at Penn State Erie, The Behrend College. He received the A. A. S. in Mechanical Drafting and Design in 1989 from Westmoreland County Community College, the B. S. in Mechanical Engineering Technology in 1991 from Penn State Erie, The Behrend College, and the M. S. in Manufacturing Systems Engineering from the University of Pittsburgh in 1998. Mr. Nitterright is a member of the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE). Fred Nitterright began his career as a machinist at Elliott Support Services in Donora
requirements to obtain an associates degree?” Determining the ability toanswer this question is central to determining the ability to answer several broad follow-onquestions that will allow us to more closely gauge the preparation and success of communitycollege students in baccalaureate engineering programs. For example, • Do engineering students who begin at community colleges perform as well, better than, or not as well as other students? What factors influence their success rate? • How many community college graduates are admitted to Research I Institutions? • How many obtain graduate degrees? • What career paths do students with A.S. degrees in e/et follow?Two critical steps in this project are (1) examining enrollments of
fosters thedevelopment of engineering knowledge, skills, and achievement, both within college and inlaunching a successful career as an engineer. We define a successful engineering career as onethat is beneficial to the young person and – through his or her skills, creativity andentrepreneurship – to society. While it is of course the case that students need to developtechnical fluency in science, engineering, and math, as well as the ability to approach problemsfrom a multidisciplinary perspective, there is reason to believe that these science/technologyskills are not sufficient to foster engineering achievement in school and in life. The Personalfactors, such as motivation, orientation towards teamwork, planning, persistence and even
groups. This is a pure indication that fewer women and minoritychoose careers in engineering and technology. Women have been traditionally underrepresentedin science and engineering.1,2 Ethnic minorities are also traditionally underrepresented in scienceand engineering. According to the US Code – Section 1067: Congressional Findings, “As theNation’s population becomes more diverse, it is important that the educational and training needsof all Americans are met; underrepresentation of minorities in science and technological fieldsdiminishes our Nation’s competitiveness by impairing the quantity of well prepared scientists,engineers, and technical experts in these fields.”3 In the book Talking About Leaving, WhyUndergraduates Leave the Sciences,4
concepts and increase student interest in engineering asa career, Power Wheels® cars were purchased and provided to student teams in afreshman engineering design course. The teams were asked to “reverse engineer” thevehicles e.g. determine how the power was supplied to the vehicle, examine thetransmission, steering mechanism etc. Accelerometers and velocity sensors were alsomounted on the vehicles for data collection. Another class of engineering sophomores,majoring in electrical and computer engineering, provided expertise to the freshmandesign course in the development of control devices, such as an automatic steering andvehicle speed control. The toy car platform was designed to support radio control ofvehicle operations and also to allow semi
knowledge and skills from their capstone experience that they couldtransfer to their future careers. Yet, little is known about what students actually transfer to lifeafter graduation.2. MotivationThe transfer literature is filled with varying definitions and frameworks about what constitutestransfer. While it is not the intent of the authors to advocate for a particular framework, it isimportant to articulate the theoretical background from which our work originates. Our view oftransfer is influenced by the work of Schwartz et al.11 In their view, transfer is not necessarilythe ability to directly apply what one has learned to new situations but rather an identification ofskills and knowledge that best position preparation for future learning
University of Wisconsin-Madison. Her research is focused on the STEM career pipeline, especially related to engi- neering, engineering education and the molecular biosciences. In addition to her work in education re- search, she is also the Director of scientific courses at the BioPharmaceutical Technology Center Institute in Madison, WI, where she coordinates curricula in the area of molecular biology.Christine G. Nicometo, University of Wisconsin, Madison Christine G. Nicometo is an associate faculty associate in the Engineering Professional Development (EPD) Department at the University of Wisconsin-Madison. Within EPD, she teaches technical commu- nication courses in three programs: Technical Communication Certificate
Emeritus Professor of Purdue University. USA. Most of his academic career is associated with Purdue University. He has been a Professor of Computer Science and Director of the Computational Science & Engineering Program of Purdue University. He is a member of working groups WG2.5 IFIP on mathematical software and European ICT Directors. Page 22.1521.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 3rd graders experience on using an autodidactic programming software: A phenomenological perspectiveIntroduction Interest in informal, meaning out of classroom
: collaborating in teams, learning about the broad social contextand implications of engineering projects, and practicing habits of mind that lead to lifelonglearning. As students critically reflect on their information-seeking behaviour, they are self-evaluating and re-directing their personal learning experience and expanding their awareness ofwhat comprises a salient and valid information source. Page 22.1682.6References:1. Kerins G, Madden R, Fulton C. Information seeking and students studying for professional careers: The cases ofengineering and law students in Ireland. Information Research. 2004;10.2. Ercegovac Z. What engineering sophomores know and
more peoplewould consider an engineering career.5 Some believed that bringing engineering to childrenearlier in their educational career might be a productive strategy.4,28,131.2 Challenges of Teaching Engineering to EveryoneThe Engineering in Your World course was designed with very specific characteristics, based onProfessor Ng’s personal experience, conversations with colleagues, and research done whilewriting the book, She’s an Engineer? Princeton Alumnae Reflect. Since SCU is an all-women’sinstitution, the challenges of bringing engineering material became greater. Three maincharacteristics were maintained from the inception of the course: 1) Hands-on activities, 2