Paper ID #45250Work-in-Progress: Development of an HBCU/Research 1 Collaborative toIncrease African American Semiconductor Manufacturing ResearchersDr. Laura Sams Haynes, Georgia Institute of Technology Dr. Laura Sams Haynes is faculty and Director of the Office of Outreach in Electrical and Computer Engineering at the Georgia Institute of Technology in Atlanta. Laura is passionate about developing and launching various outreach initiatives for K12 Atlanta Public Schools (APS) partners, including students and school counselors, as well as fostering HBCU partnerships, collaborations, and pathways, often with a focus on NSF
. 4Purpose & Research QuestionsOur study seeks to address the unique challenges faced by Black/African American undergraduatestudents in STEM entrepreneurship and to develop targeted solutions. By identifying specificbarriers and motivations within this demographic, we aim to enhance the STEM-RAEE programand better address these issues. The following results and discussion provide insights from ourresearch that will guide the creation of tailored interventions to increase diversity in the STEMentrepreneurship ecosystem.Utilizing pilot survey data from over 80 Black/African American students across two HBCUs, ouranalysis focused on three primary research questions: 1. Barriers: What specific barriers do students anticipate encountering
Education, 2025 Supporting Engineering Graduate Students to Create Inclusive Learning Environments: A Professional Development Program at a Hispanic-Serving Institution Keywords: Graduate, undergraduate, engineering IntroductionIncreasing diversity and equity remains a national goal for STEM (science, technology,engineering, and mathematics) education in the United States [1], as men and white individualscontinue to receive a disproportionate share of STEM bachelor's degrees and are overrepresentedin the national STEM workforce [2]. Creating cultures of inclusion at institutions and withinSTEM departments and classrooms is vital for the success of
: What are the gendered experiences that women engineering students describe as directly affecting their mental health and help-seeking attitudes? 5Research Approach• Thematic analysis of women identifying participants during Year 1 of the study (n=25)• Performed by one of the team members• Interrater reliability was secured 6Results• Being the only woman exacerbates MHCs, deters help-seeking, and limits ability to build networks of support• Gendered perceptions can hide MHCs and deter help-seeking• Sexist comments limit women ability to create
to ensure an equitable, inclusive, and supportive workplace and learning community. • Collaborates with the Associate Dean (AD) to 1) define strategic priorities and examine policies, and 2) develop DEI goals and objectives for the College and its units. • Utilizes data collection and analysis to identify challenges, enhance transparency, establish accountability measures, propose effective solutions, and define metrics for evaluating progress within the college’s units and other assigned areas. • Leads and oversees the development and implementation of programs, activities, and other initiatives to educate the community on diversity, inclusion, and belonging, and to increase diversity within GCOE. Prior to
Underrepresented Entrepreneurs in Interdisciplinary Engineering TechnologyAbstract:In the realm of unaddressed ethnic disparities in the United States, the issue of venture capitalfunding is often overlooked. Despite their significant presence in the population, Hispanic andBlack entrepreneurs receive only a fraction of venture capital investment, which is a starkcontrast to their demographic representation. A staggering 77% of venture capital recipients areWhite, 9% women, and nearly 2% Latino, leaving just a minuscule 1% for African Americanentrepreneurs (remaining were Asians and Middle Easterners), regardless of their gender oreducational qualifications [1]. Multiple sources claim an even higher population than 80% ofWhite and approx. 1% Black
Bakka, Jill Castle, Dr. Maura Borrego The University of Texas at Austin 1 RoadmapBackground on LGBTQ+ studentexperiences in STEM Describe the details of the study and data analysis Discuss the themes that emerged and next steps 2 Language Used I will be using the terms “LGBTQ+” and “Queer” interchangeably to refer to anyone with a marginalized sexual or gender identity. I will be using the term “transgender” to refer to someone whose gender identity does not align with their sex they were assigned at birth I will use the term TGNB to refer to anyone with a
participants’ social interactions and mentornetworks. We included an emphasis on technology through coding and computer science, variousengineering fields, and included a mental health focus. More pre- and post-assessments wereprovided to help decide ANGELS participants’ engineering identity and engineering communalvalues. This CoNECD paper will lead to a discussion on the importance of connecting academiaand the community as it relates to diversity in education, as modeled in the ANGELS Programs.Keywords: girls in STEM, Summer Program, Networks, non-traditional STEM educationIntroductionWhile many STEM fields (e.g., Biology) have made significant strides in supporting therecruitment and retention of some underrepresented groups [1], women
by increasing women’s participation in the engineering field. Wediscuss our process and findings further.Keywords: gender gap, Middle Eastern students, engineering, systematized reviewIntroduction:There is clear gender inequity in the global landscape of engineering education and professionalpractice, leading women to be significantly underrepresented in comparison to men [1]. Thesedifferences are especially clear in Middle Eastern countries, where such societies exist with specialcultural, social, and institutional characteristics that lead women to face unique challenges. Thesefeatures–for example, job market biases that favor males in engineering and other technical fieldsand societal expectations that steer women towards fields perceived
, disability is stigmatized, and open discussions ofneurodivergence and disability are less prevalent, leading to an inability to understand howindividuals with ADHD navigate engineering ecosystems. We have two main objectives in thispaper: 1) critically analyze framings of ADHD and disability in engineering, and 2) create anddisseminate qualitative elicitation questions to create counterstories from individuals withADHD. This work forms part of a larger project to answer the following research question: Canwe reconceptualize ADHD in engineering beyond deficit frameworks through criticalmethods that uncover and question hegemonic discourses and the power those discourseshave? Positionality Statement and Introduction to Co-authorsOur
of color-evasive ideology.METHODSData CollectionInstruments. During December 2023 we administered a survey to STEM faculty members andadministrators throughout the U.S. The first two sections were Pohan and Aguilar’s (2001)Personal Beliefs about Diversity and Professional Beliefs About Diversity scales, consisting of15 and 25 items, respectively. The belief scales included questions that address a range ofidentities, including race, ethnicity, gender, disability, LGBTQ identity, socioeconomic status,and nationality. For this study, we examined only race, ethnicity, and nationality. Respondentswere asked to what extent they agreed or disagreed with each statement using a five-point Likertscale that ranged from strongly disagree (1) to
engineering sparked my interest in wanting tounderstand the experiences & knowledge of faculty, specifically the experiences that influenced their pedagogical practices. 1 Knowledge Check Critical When you hear the term critical, what does It mean to you? Critical ConsciousnessHave you heard of the concept criticalconsciousness? If so, where and what Is your understanding of it? 2Background 3 Critical Consciousness An individual’s awareness of oppressive systemic forces in society, Defined a sense of
, and educatio ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Gendered Impacts of Code Critiquers on Self-Efficacy in First-Year Engineering StudentsIntroductionThe demand for skilled programmers in industry continues to grow. However, research hasshown that women often face challenges in developing programming skills, primarily due tolower levels of programming self-efficacy [1], [2]. This discrepancy has contributed to persistentgender gaps in technology-related fields. There remains a critical research gap regarding thedifferential impact of educational interventions on programming self-efficacy across genders,particularly in engineering. Addressing this gap is essential to
, there has been a growing emphasis on the importance of inclusive and equitableteaching practices in higher education [1], [2]. As diversity in student populations increases [3],it becomes imperative for faculty to adapt their teaching methods to create equitable andinclusive learning environments and to adapt their course material to address societal issues. Thisneed is especially pronounced in engineering education, which has traditionally been perceivedas a meritocratic field where objective measures of performance overshadow the nuancedrealities of diverse student experiences [4], [5]. This perception can inadvertently perpetuatestructural inequities, as it overlooks the diverse backgrounds and learning needs of students,leading to
-political trends increasinglyemphasize “data-driven” ideas, boosting the importance of statistical and data literacy forinformed participation in our broader communities. However, there is a persistent “digitaldivide” in which individuals from under-resourced communities have less exposure and access totechnological tools and learning [1]. This gap corresponds with new inequalities as technologiesare largely developed by and accessible to people with privilege [2], [3]. This makes equitableaccess to relevant knowledge and skills an important social justice concern.Research suggests that in SDS, people who are lower-income, Black, Latine, women, and/ordisabled are underrepresented in high school coursework and/or the profession [4], [5], [6], [7
orchallenges of these groups, underscoring the need for further research to identify these variables.[1]Another study by Griffin et al. focused on group size effects in a capstone senior design projectrevealed similar results. Over two semesters, students in larger groups achieved high grades andreported better experiences than those in smaller groups. [2] The upcoming sections of our studywill delve into the possible reasons behind these outcomes, including the impact of personalitiesin smaller groups versus factors like work distribution in larger groups.In a preliminary study to this one, the authors’ examined the impact of gender compositionwithin medium-sized groups. This study seemed to indicate that students in groups with an evengender
stakeholder groups.Introduction & Literature ReviewNationally, there are widely known, persistent inequities in STEM student outcomes. This studyhas its origins in concerns about inequities, but concerns were accompanied by a skepticismabout simplistic diagnoses of the problem. Inequitable student outcomes have strong associationswith race and family income, which can be proxies for access to quality secondary education andparental college achievement [1], but there are other factors at work. Students pursuing STEMmajors in college often suffer even worse outcomes than their non-STEM peers, with studentsfrom underserved groups experiencing much lower retention rates (i.e., retention in a STEMmajor and retention in college generally) and
environment, setting a newparadigm in personalized, diverse, and inclusive engineering education through AI technology.1. IntroductionThe pursuit of educational equity for students living with disabilities (SLWD) has been atransformative journey, marked by a series of legal and policy milestones that reflect an evolvingunderstanding of what equity should look like in learning environments. Initially, the concept ofeducational equity in the United States emerged from the need to provide accessible education toa diverse population amid industrialization and increased immigration [1], [2]. However, thisearly notion of equity often overlooked the needs of marginalized groups, including the poor,SLWD, indigenous peoples, and African Americans. The Civil
after high school completion, known as the immediate college rate [1, p. 24].Specifically, increasing enrollment and retention in STEM degrees remains an ongoing challengeas its workforce accounts for 24% of the total U.S. workforce [2]. In this regard, there is a specialinterest in increasing the number of degrees in STEM, but also in the fact that workers representthe diversity of the country. In order to promote STEM degrees, it is important to work alongsideacademia to maintain a steady professional flow and achieve diversity goals, as underrepresentedprofessionals just accounted for 23% of STEM workforce in 2021, compared to 31% of the USemployment in Non-Stem fields. [2]. Thus, efforts to increase academic preparation forunderrepresented
environment,social cognitions, job satisfaction, and turnover or persistence intentions. 1 Background search Latinx in the U.S. • One of the youngest and fastest growing groups in the U.S. • comprised 19% of the population • Represent a growing segment of the U.S. labor force • almost 1 in 5 workers are LatinxWe will start by providing a context for this group and why more research is needed
-environmental factors shaping STEM persistence and post-secondary plans Pulled in or pushed out? Underrepresented minority high school students describe socio- environmental factors shaping STEM persistence and post-secondary plans AbstractIntroductionThis research applies the Phenomenological Variant of Ecological Systems Theory to understandthe persistence of racially underrepresented minority (URM) youth in STEM pathways. URMyouth aspire to STEM careers at the same rate as White peers [1], but Black and Latinx studentsleave STEM disciplines at nearly twice the rate of White students [2]. As a result, the STEMworkforce does not reflect the country’s diversity. Literature reveals key
focus on elements of academic and career advising.With undergraduate engineering education being an externally-accredited (ABET) professionaldegree, the importance of academic and career advising is well known. Although ABET doesnot specify how programs and institutions should support students towards engineering degreecompletion and career preparation, the following are some of the criteria that a programevaluator is trained to look for and evaluate against: (1) appropriate evaluation and monitoring ofstudent performance towards degree completion (Criterion 1), (2) appropriate academic advisingprocedures and practices (Criterion 1), (3) appropriate career advising procedures and practices(Criterion 1 and 6), (4) engagement with engineering
education faces, and manyorganizations face, in recruiting diverse talent is also known. According to ChatGPT 4.0(September 2, 2024) and edited to be represented in a figure format (Figure 1), we highlight justsome of the challenges that hinder organizations from building diverse teams. Some of thesechallenges that hinder higher education and hinder engineering education too include: • Biases in Recruitment Processes • Biased Institutional Barriers and Practices • Misalignment of Goals and Practices • Resistance to Change • Company Culture and Lack of Inclusivity • Resource Constraints to Implement Effective Strategies • Lack of Diversity
. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 A narrative study of food insecurestudents in engineering and computing Justin C. Major, Ph.D 2025 CoNECD Conference This material is based upon grants supported by the New Jersey Office of the Secretary of Higher Education (NJOSHE). Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the reviews of NJOSHE. 1 Hunger is a serious issue among college students. • ~24-30% of college
proceedings were extracted and analyzed for this purpose.These proceedings constitute a significant portion of current scholarly research in engineeringeducation and offer a robust foundation for examining trends in language use over this three-yearperiod. To identify biased language, we utilized a keyword-based model, drawing keywords fromthe language guidelines of the APA 7th edition, which emphasize the importance of inclusiveand bias-free language. We identified 85 keywords that could potentially induce bias,categorizing them by subject area in engineering education, as detailed in Table 1. This approachled to the initial identification of 5,134 potential instances of language bias. A subsequentmanual review was then conducted to exclude
(Tech.) (MERGED) Dr. Wright is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Teaching, Learning, & Curriculum in Drexel University’s School of Education. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 “Three strikes, you’re out… actually, that’s four strikes”: Transgressive Teacher and Student Humor in a Pre-College Engineering Classroom George Schafer (they/them), Christopher Wright (he/him) Drexel University School of EducationCoNECD Presentation Page 1 of 22OVERVIEWIntroductionContext of StudyHumor and EquityTheoretical ApproachThemes from AnalysisConclusionCoNECD Presentation Page 2 of 22 CONTEXT OF STUDY
practices andstructures that form an HSI. The multitude of practices and structures of an institution that can besteered towards servingness are defined as Structures for Serving in the framework. In turn, themeasurable outcomes in the student’s experiences that result from these structures, encompassingacademic and non-academic outcomes, are considered Indicators for Serving in the framework.As a relationship has been characterized as being directly influenced by an institution's policies,practices, organizational culture, and structures (NASEM, 2018), we use the HSI Servingnessframework to characterize graduate faculty advising as a potential Structure for Serving. In thisline, we consider the students’ TSE an Indicator of Serving.Figure 1. A
students in CET - Invested in SWAG items (Total ~ $1000) Actions Taken 1. Targeting First-Year Students a. Recognizing the comments about the Accepted Student Overnight as a welcoming tradition, we wanted to ensure that we were making connection with incoming class of students to our College b. Creating a CampusGroups page - the online portal for Student Activities and Student Organization/Club management c. Participated in the New Student Orientation Move-in Days Resource Fair for new students and families 2. Sending emails to all women students in our College to join the new WIT CampusGroups page a. Previously a newsletter was