, biodegradable films, an unit operations in food engineering. His teaching interests are statistics, heat transfer, unit operations in food engineering, bioseparations and experimental design.Dr. S. Murat Bagdatli, Celal Bayar University Dr. S. Murat Bagdatli is a faculty member of Mechanical Engineering Department at the Faculty of Engi- neering, Celal Bayar University, Manisa, Turkey. His areas of research are mainly modeling of nonlinear systems, linear/nonlinear vibrations in mechanical systems, experimental linear/nonlinear vibrations, and perturbation methods. His teaching interests are dynamics, mechanical vibrations, and automatic control.Dr. Ismet Anitsal Dr. Ismet Anitsal is Faye Halfacre Moore Professor of
Paper ID #7238Using the ASME Student Design Competition as the Culminating Design andBuild Experience in a Freshman Level CAD-CAM CourseDr. Wendy S. Reffeor, Grand Valley State University Dr. Wendy Reffeor, Ph.D. is an Assistant of Engineering in the Padnos School of Engineering at Grand Valley State University. She holds a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from GMI Engineering & Manage- ment Institute, an M.S. in Mechanical Engineering from Purdue University and a Ph.D. from Michigan State University. Since joining GVSU, she has focused on introducing design in traditionally analytical courses in the Engineering Mechanics
s tudents todevelo p res earc h s k ills (s uc h as reviewing literature, c o nduc ting experim ents , Res po ns e Res po ns eAns wer Optio ns Perc ent Co untNot met 0.0% 0Partly met 0.0% 0Mostly met 20.0% 1Completely met 80.0% 4 answered questio n 5The s ec o nd o bjec tive is to help
multiplechoice questions (see Appendix) was taken to evaluate students’ knowledge of the FDM 3000operations and applications. The test scores from three groups were tabulated and illustratedbelow (see Table 1 and Figure 9): Table 1: The test performance among the designated three groups Group #1 (Control Group-Live Group #2 (RP Simulator-Old Group #3 (RP Simulator-New Instruction) Version) Version) S. No For 16 S. No For 16 S. No For 16 1 14 1 10 1 9 2 8 2 9 2 9
materials and processes with a view to maximize energy conservation, minimize environmental impact and facilitate sustainable development via recycling / reuse. Be something that you can realistically prototype without costing a fortune. Prototype must look and feel as much like the final design as possible Have some special characteristic(s) that will make it marketable e.g. added functionality, pleasing appearance, lightweight etc. Try to come up with a concept for a tool or product that you would like to own and that you want to work on.4. Course Implementation4.1 IDS Course Delivery Tasks and TimelineEngineering and marketing students work together to develop ideas for new product(s).Marketing
presented in the lectureclasses. Some students preferred advanced machining (Use of CNC machines) but thought theshop experience was worthwhile. The student evaluations were generally positive and thestudents enjoyed the lab sessions where they learned a variety of manufacturing and assemblyprocesses, and developed an appreciation for the working of machine tools and other equipment.The supplemental activities following each manufacturing process helped to tie in the lecture andlaboratory classes.BIBLIOGRAPHY[1] Manufacturing Engineering and Technology,, Kalpakjian, S., and Schmidt, S., 6th Edition, Prentice Hall, 2010..[2] Materials Selection in Mechanical Design, Ashby, M. F., Fourth Edition, Butterworth-Heinneman, 2006
. Page 23.100.3 2. Since the tool used is not designed for wet application(s) and is not protected against intrusion of the fine glass dust generated as a byproduct of polishing, each tool only lasts approximately one month before the tool is degraded to the point to which it is no longer economically repairable. At about $275 per tool and the need for replacement at an average rate of three tools per month, the added cost of tool replacements adds significantly to the cost of hand polishing. Figure 1: Traditional polishing processDesign ProcessThe goals of the senior design project were to reduce process cost
& Exposition, Austin, TX.18. Frank, M., & Waks, S., 2001. Engineering Systems Thinking: A Multifunctional Definition. Systemic Practice Page 23.1129.11 and Action Research 14(3): 361-379.19. Davidz, H.L. & Nightingale, D.L., 2008. Enabling Systems Thinking to Accelerate the Development of Senior System Engineers. Systems Engineering 11(1): 1-14.20. Froyd, J., Pchenitchnaia, L., Fowler, D. & Simpson, D., 2007. Systems Thinking and Integrative Learning Outcomes. Proceedings of the 2007 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Honolulu, HI.21. Senge, P. M., 1990. The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of
, Van Nostrand Reinhold New York 1990.6. Pahl G. and Beitz W and Wallacw K., Engineering Design: A Systematic Approach, 2nd Edition, Springer 1995.7. Ullman D.G.,The Mechanical Design Process, 3rd Edition, McGraw Hill, Singapore 2004.8. Mohd Hashim, Using Functional Descriptions to Assist the Redesign Process, PhD Thesis, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Leeds, UK 1993.9. Sivaloganathan S., Abdulrahman A., ALDousari S., ALShamsi A. and ALAmeri A., Design of Next Generation Products by Novice Designers Using Function Based Design Interpretation, Proceedings of ICoRD’13, IITMadras, Chennai India, January 2013.10. Boothroyd G., Knight W.and Dewhurst P, Product Design for Manufacture and Assembly, 2nd Edition
://www.statit.com/services/SPCOverview_mfg.pdf (3) Rajalingam, S., Bono, Awang, Sulaiman, Jumat Bin. “Identifying the Critical Moulding Machine Parameters Affecting Injection Moulding Process by Basic Statistical Process Page 23.110.8 Control,” International Journal of Engineering and Physical Sciences, 6, 2012, 358-364.Page 23.110.9
exposure to metal working fluid, NIOSH Publication No. (1998) 98-102.[2] E. O. Bennett, D. L. Bennett, Occupational airways diseases in the metal working industries, Tribology International, 18/3 (1985) 169-176.[3] N. Boubekri, V. Shaikh, Machining using minimum quantity lubrication: A technology for sustainability, International Journal of Applied Science and Technology, 2 (2012) 111-115.[4] K. Weinert, I. Inasaki, J.W. Sutherland, T. Wakabayashi, Dry machining and minimum quantity lubrication. CIRP Ann. Manuf. Technol. 53 (2004) 511-537. [5] S. Zhang, J.F. Li, Y.W. Wang, Tool life and cutting forces in end milling Inconel 718 under dry and minimum quantity cooling lubrication cutting conditions, Journal
Factors Affecting Student Satisfaction”, Journal Of Education For Business, Vol. 85, No. 2, pp. 95 – 100, 2009.4. Koenig, R., “A Study in Analyzing Effectiveness of Undergraduate Course Delivery: Classroom, Online And Video Conference From A Student and Faculty Perspective”, Contemporary Issues in Education Research, Vol. 3, No. 10, pp. 13–25, October 2010.5. Kim, K. S., and Moore, J. L., “Web-based learning: Factors affecting students’ satisfaction and learning experience”, 2005, Retrieved December 30, 2010, from http://www.firstmonday.org/issues/issue10_11/kim/index.html6. Young, A. and Norgard, C., “Assessing the quality of online courses from the students' perspective”, The Internet and Higher Education, Vol. 9
. Arc Flash is due to the rapidrelease of energy caused by an arcing fault between two phases or from a phase to ground of anAC power circuit. The discharge of energy may be massive and vaporize copper causing an arcblast devastating everything in its path. This may be more easily described in the followingfigure or from the YouTube video inadvertently shown in the EET class a year ago. The resultsare devastating.Why the focus on Arc Flash?The study of arc flash dates to the early 1980's paper "The Other Electrical Hazard: Electric ArcBlast Burns" by Ralph Lee which was published in the IEEE Transactions on IndustrialApplications. The standards based on this paper have been available for quite a long time buthave only recently been taken
required by investors, E(R)In estimating the expected rate of return, the assumption was made that the company could belocated in either the US or a Latin American country such as Peru. For the US option, the riskfree rate of return, RF was 6%, the market rate of return, RM, was 10% (S&P 500),5 the unleveredbeta, β, for the company was 1.29.6 This is beta value for the diversified chemical industry,which is a close substitute for the plastics company’s beta value. Substituting these values inequation (2) yields an expected rate of return of 11.2% for the plastics company. ERUS 6% 1.2910% 6% 11.2%Estimating the E(R) for Peru with equation (2) seemed a bit more difficult because of sparsefinancial data to
Coordinator Conference and completion of Student Evaluation Form)Following grading scale is observed for each course: (94 - 100%, A), (90- 93%, A-), (87- 89%,B+), (83- 86%, B), (80- 82%, B-), (77- 79%, C+), (70- 76%,C), (60 -69, D), (0 -59, F)During the course of the internship, the student must develop and maintain a weekly journal, toserve as a tool for recording learning experiences5. The journal should also include log of thestudent's activities and a collection of thoughts and insights gained from the activities. Thejournal may contain any on-the-job issues or problems and related solutions or courses of actiontaken. A final report is also mandatory. This is above and beyond the weekly journal. The formatand topic(s) of the final report is
make manufacturing flow smoothly. 4. DFV determines tolerance using tolerance analysis. Designers have a tendency to arbitrarily assign tolerances to critical components in products. Using scatter plots (Bhote, 2000) tolerances can be decided on critical components that are close enough to achieve the functional requirement and at the same time are not Page 23.664.6 too restrictive to unnecessarily increase the manufacturing cost. An example of 6 how this can be done using Shainin’ s Red X and Green Y ideas (Bhote, 2000) is shown in Figure 3
Project-based learning modules 18 Current STEM research articles/studies from the field Standards from your content area paired with standards from 19 another STEM content area Ideas and resources you learned at professional development 20 session(s) 21 Formative assessments to measure student content knowledge Graphing utilities as software tools to model mathematical 22 phenomena 23 Engineering design concepts 24 Diagrams as tools for problem solving 25 Information about cutting-edge STEM careers Page 23.383.8Teacher Videotapes: As a part of their Letters of Partnership, LEAs participating at the
Priority s turers Priority Priority Priority Priority Top Top Priority Priority Advanced processes 16 12 11 4 25 18 23 18 Advanced theoretical methods 1 4 0 1 5 6 1 3 Automation and controls 33 19 16 17 36 19 36 22 Basic science and mathematics 11 3 3 8 16 6 18 8 Basic processes 11 6 5 5 5
, Object 2: Differentiate between servo and non-serve control systems Higher Order Thinking Skillsits components question, Object 3: Differentiate between manual and automatic programmingto see differentiate Object 4: Differentiate between robot handling and assemblyinterrelationship contrast ...s and ideasB5: Synthesis Create, design,- to use creativity Object 1: Create and Generate Automatic Path Generation develop, collect,to compose and
Page 23.1201.84 Materials and Processes in Manufacturing 4th Mechanical4 Vibration Analysis OR Control Systems 4th Mech/Elec6 Senior Design Project 4th CommonCourse Content. When the course was first developed, it included only topics directly related tomaterials and processes. However, over the last 20 years the content has been expanded toinclude more topics relevant to contemporary manufacturing competitiveness, such as qualityand design for manufacturing. The official course description reflects this mix of content. ENGR 324. Materials and Processes in Manufacturing (4) S. This course introduces
, H., Wu, Y., “Web-based virtual operating of CNC milling machine tools”, Computers in Industry, Vol. 60 (9), December 2009, pp. 686-687.13. Djassemi, M., “A HANDS-ON APPROACH TO TEACHING CAD/CAM FOR MANUFACTURING AND RAPID PROTOTYPING APPLICATIONS”, The Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition (on CD), June 24-27, 2007, Honalulu, Hawaii, 9 pages.14. Pritschow, G., and S. Röck. "“Hardware in the Loop” Simulation of Machine Tools." CIRP Annals- Manufacturing Technology 53.1 (2004): 295-298.15. Adamski, W. (2010). Manufacturing Development Strategies in Aviation Industry. Advances in Manufacturing