Page 23.1344.3that address practices inherent to an array of differing engineering concentrations.Background on Use of the Portfolio Approach and Multi-year Project CurriculumThe engineering department at this institution has been using portfolios to assess projectwork since 2007, when the multi-year engineering project curriculum was firstimplemented. This Integrated Projects Curriculum “builds on service-learningpedagogy…it embodies the three modes […] required for service-learning: content,engagement, and reflection.”16 The IPC intersects with, and is further resourced by theCollaboratory for Strategic Partnerships and Applied Research, where engineeringstudents interact with students in other disciplines.17 Messiah College is currently
has been supported by theNanotechnology in Undergraduate Education (NUE) program at the National ScienceFoundation. The first NanoCORE program was successfully completed during January 2009through December 2010, and the NanoCORE II program extended the project efforts duringJanuary 2011 through December 2012.The FAMU-FSU College of Engineering is home to a diverse student body where 42% of theundergraduate student population belongs to traditionally under-represented groups. TheNanoCORE program introduces and integrates nanoscale science and engineering (NSE) aspermanent components of the core undergraduate engineering curricula, presents multipleopportunities for undergraduate learning of concepts in nanoscale science and engineering
required collaboration with the Assistant Dean of Freshman Experience in theengineering college and the freshman engineering professors to define content, identify logisticproblems and solutions to those issues, and address the inherent challenges of teaching bothfreshmen and engineering students. Because of these different filters, the class was developed inconsideration of the ABET and ALA/ACRL/STS standards1. Additionally, ENGR 101 hasevolved over time through continued collaboration with the ENGR 101 professors.In spring 2011, an Information Literacy grant was given to the Assistant Dean of Engineering.This grant enabled the two engineering librarians to develop curriculum to be included in allENGR 101 classes to address library information
Paper ID #7052High School Students Modeling Behaviors During Engineering DesignMr. Tanner J Huffman, Purdue University Tanner Huffman is a research assistant and Ph.D. candidate in the Technology, Leadership and Innovation department at Purdue University. Additionally, he is an engineering and technology instructor at Richland Senior High School (7-12) in Johnstown, Pa. Tanner has experience writing integrated STEM curriculum and delivering professional development workshops on ITEEA’s Engineering by Design program. His research interests include modeling and design in STEM education, as well as STEM teacher professional
. Avoid the failure to plan well for meeting students’ needs at the program level. Think and plan beyond individual courses. How can everything from admission processes, to Page 23.1224.10 orientation, curriculum, cross-course integration, the projects that students complete, and alumni relations be structured to provide students with an integrated, innovative educational experience? Such experiences can and do occur in best-practice online degree programs, but only when such integrated experiences are valued by institutions and intentionally supported in program design and operation.ConclusionThe creative use of
higher-education engineering classrooms through the paradigm of STEM integration. She is creating and testing inno- vative, interdisciplinary curricular approaches that engage students in developing models of real world problems/solutions and working with educators to shift their expectations and instructional practice to facilitate effective STEM integration.Mr. Aran W Glancy, University of Minnesota, Twin Cities Aran W. Glancy is a graduate research assistant at the University of Minnesota pursuing a Ph.D. in STEM Education with an emphasis in Mathematics Education. He received his M.Ed. in Science Education (Physics) from Lehigh University. Prior to enrolling at the University of Minnesota, Aran spent six years
both the engineering design process andfrom the results of the project that the students follow.When soliciting company sponsors, the objectives of the Multidisciplinary Engineering CapstoneProgram must be clearly stated to ensure the program’s success. The focus of the program is todevelop a student’s skills to be a successful professional in the engineering field. Expectationsfor students, faculty advisors, and company sponsors are communicated to all participants.Students are screened prior registering for the course through the submission of a professionalresume and an interviewed to discuss the program and expectations. The screening process helpsunderstand the students’ integrity and motivation and will help increase the success of
are tightly integrated;writing and presentation assignments in 103 and 104 support lectures and lab content from 111and 112. The 103 and 104 courses meet in small sections only, with about 32 students persection. The 111 and 112 courses have both a large lecture section (with all ~300 students),and also small lab sections, again with approximately 24 students per section.Figure 1. Overview of freshman engineering curriculum at Binghamton UniversityThe main intent of these WTSN courses is to expose students directly to hands-on engineering intheir first year of college, as well as to help them make a more informed decision as to whichengineering major to select. As has been noted in several studies 3-7 it is believed that the highattrition
. Page 23.969.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2013 BT-ATE Pipeline for Progress: A Multi-Level Educational Plan for an Emerging IndustryAbstract: A dynamic and innovative Biosystems Technology (BT) curriculum was developed atthe secondary, technical college and university levels. The curriculum includes core concepts inlife science, engineering, technology and mathematics focused on applications in biologicalsystems that transition student learning and depth of understanding from one level to the next.The program was successful in educating students with increased STEM knowledge, with anemphasis on engineering content, to prepare them for the technical workforce in
industry. From a pedagogical perspective,simulation is often viewed as “something to expose a student to”, one of several skills that are tobe acquired in a CNC course. However, with current advances in IT, simulation should also beviewed as an enabler of learning. A properly developed and integrated simulation environment Page 23.1336.3can be used by the instructor to explain programming concepts during lectures and labs, and forassisting with assessment. It can be used by students to help develop and hone their skills whencompleting homework assignments and in preparing for machining labs. A simulationenvironment can provide a level of
courses to other sustainability-related educational efforts on campus.IntroductionSustainability has become an increasingly important consideration for society in general as wellas for the engineering profession. Materials engineering is particularly important for addressingsustainability, since materials engineers are involved both in the production and processing ofmaterials with low energy use and low environmental impact (supply side) as well as in theselection of materials (demand side). Thus, sustainability concepts are especially relevant inmaterials engineering courses and curricula.Sustainability content can be integrated into existing materials engineering courses or presentedin separate courses, both of which have value. Integration
making a businesscontact to determine educational needs of adult professional learners, the first step is todetermine basic needs or requirements of the target audience; in this scenario, the focus is adultprofessional learners and their respective businesses and industries.In offering graduate education to adult professional engineering and technology learners wefrequently assume one of three basic curriculum positions: (1) offer an existing program, (2)offer a curriculum permutation of existing courses, or (3) offer a permutation of existing andcustomized courses as deemed required by the end recipient (student or organization).This paper examines and extends a most recently evolved study that provides insight into thetarget engineering and
andespecially those of tomorrow need to be innovative, creative, inventive, inspired, and original inlearning how to do more with less. It is not any surprise then that the American Society of CivilEngineers (ASCE) is also simultaneously pushing to see these types of skills integrated intoacademic curriculum. ASCE has indicated that one of the attributes that should be embraced bythe Civil Engineer of 2025 is creativity, leading to “proactive identification of possibilities andopportunities and taking action to develop them.”2 ASCE has further indicated that civilengineering students need to also develop the ability to critically think.3 If our civil engineeringstudents are to achieve success in professional engineering practice, they must develop the
Paper ID #6714Use of Flash Simulations to Enhance Nanotechnology EducationDr. Lifang Shih, Excelsior College Li-Fang Shih received her Ph.D. in curriculum and instruction with specialization in online instruction from the State University of New York at Albany. Dr. Shih is current the Associate Dean for the School of Business and Technology at Excelsior College. Her researches have focused on issues related to quality online instruction, outcome assessments, online communication, and the development of online commu- nity, etc. Her papers have been presented in national conferences such as American Education Research
forms.2O’Neill and Harris identify four categories of e-mentoring:3 Ask-an-expert: professionals answer questions on an ad hoc basis. Tutoring: usually a one-to-one exchange based on a rigorous master-to-apprentice scenario. Curriculum-Based Tele-mentoring: students pursue in-depth examinations of topics covered in the classroom, guided by their external mentor-expert. A Tele-mentoring Relationship: exchanges move beyond question-and-answer to achieve goals of broad-based affective and cognitive development.We have adopted the best practices from these successful approaches in order to use socialnetworking to build powerful mentoring relationships among 9th-grade girls and female
. A., and Frey, W. J. (2003). An Effective Strategy for Integrating Ethics across the Curriculum in Engineering: An Abet 2000 Challenge. Science & Engineering Ethics, 9(4), 543-68.34. Barry, B. E., and Ohland, M. W. (2012). Abet Criterion 3.F: How Much Curriculum Content Is Enough? Science and Engineering Ethics, 18(2), 369-92.35. Streveler, R. A., Smith, K. A., and Pilotte, M. (2012). Aligning Course Content, Assessment, and Delivery: Creating a Context for Outcome-Based Education. K. Mohd Yusof, S. Mohammad, N. Ahmad Azli, M. Noor Hassan, A. Kosnin and S. K, Syed Yusof (Eds.), Outcome-Based Education and Engineering Curriculum: Evaluation, Assessment and Accreditation. Hershey, Pennsylvania: IGI
improvement consultant for a number of manufactur- ing and service companies, and educational institutions. Roberts has worked with K-12 teachers for 30+ years facilitating curriculum development, STEM activities, and providing information on engineering ca- reers. His work at K-State includes outreach and support of STEM programs like Future City, USFIRST, Odyssey of the Mind, Boy Scouts and Engineering & Science Summer Institute (ESSI).Dr. Gary A. Clark, Kansas State University Senior Associate Dean and ProfessorDr. Amy Rachel Betz, Kansas State University Dr. Amy Betz is an assistant professor at Kansas State University in the Department of Mechanical Engineering. She received her Ph.D. from Columbia University in
such places as Oak Ridge National Laboratory and the Universities of Texas and Wisconsin in the U.S., Kyoto and Nagoya Universities in Japan, the Ioffe Institute in Russia, and Kharkov Institute of Physics and Technology in Ukraine. He was ECSE Department Head from 2001 to 2008 and served on the board of the ECE Department Heads Association from 2003 to 2008. He is presently the Education Director for the SMART LIGHTING NSF ERC.Dr. Kathleen Meehan, Virginia Tech Dr. Kathleen Meehan is presently an associate professor in the Bradley Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at Virginia Tech. Her previous academic positions were at at the University of Denver and West Virginia University. Prior to moving
Society for Engineering Education, 2013 Implementing a Campus-Wide RCR Training Requirement for Doctoral StudentsOver the last few years, Responsible Conduct of Research (RCR) training has been takingon increasing importance in the graduate curriculum. This is primarily due to a change inpolicy that was promulgated by the National Science Foundation and to evolvingguidelines for NIH training grants and fellowships. In 2011, the Georgia Institute ofTechnology (Georgia Tech) implemented an academic policy that requires all newdoctoral students to receive RCR training. It was decided that the institution would move“beyond compliance” in the sense that doctoral students would receive RCR trainingirrespective of their
Year Research Experiences for Teachers ProgramAbstractWe have successfully finished our summer program in our National Science Foundation (NSF)supported Research Experiences for Teachers (RET) Site entitled “Multidisciplinary EngineeringResearch for Rural Michigan's Future.” The summer program was 6 weeks long and hosted 7 in-service teachers (high school science) and 5 pre-service teachers (integrated science majors).Participants are split into 6 groups and teamed up with an engineering faculty and an engineeringundergraduate student each. During their 40 hours/week work schedule, participants haveworked on faculty supervised research projects for half their time and the rest was reserved forclassroom unit plans
pedagogicaltheories into practice through the development of a new online engineering course. As a second-semester student in an engineering education doctoral program I was given the opportunity todevelop a new graduate-level course for an online Master of Civil Engineering (MCE) program.Concurrently, I was enrolled in an Engineering Education course, Content, Assessment, andPedagogy: An Integrated Engineering Design Approach (CAP) and a Curriculum and Instructioncourse, Advanced Issues in Distance Education (AIDE). This combination of coursework andemployment provided an ideal opportunity to immediately apply course concepts to a real-worldproblem.The purpose of this paper is to reflect on the process of translating theoretical course concepts toa new
to study applications using unmanned aerial systems (UAS). The UASprimarily serves in military applications but recently has begun meeting civilian applications5, 6.These grants have provided great undergraduate research opportunities. A MVS will be used to Page 23.351.2develop the CMP. Mounting the CMP to the UAS could provide a powerful tool for farmers inthe future. This paper discusses the integration of this undergraduate research with teachingcontrol systems, specifically machine vision.2. Machine vision2.1 Generic machine vision modelMachine vision can be defined as a combination of an imaging sensor with image processing toprovide
the Annual ASEE Conference, 2011. 11. D. Shetty and S. Choi: Globalization and Product Design Curriculum in Engineering Programs, Proceedings of the Annual ASEE Conference, 2003. 12. D. Nieusma: Integrating Technical, Social and Aesthetic Analysis in Product Design Studio: A case Study and Model for a New Liberal Education for Engineers, Proceedings of the Annual ASEE Conference, 2008. 13. W. Loendorf, D. Richter, and D. Teachman: Results from an Interdisciplinary Service Learning Pilot Project Incorporating Universal Design Concepts for ADA Compliance, Proceedings of the Annual ASEE Conference, 2010. 14. P. A. Manohar, C. Jones and J. Radermacher: Development and Implementation of a Junior-Year
Paper ID #5702Vertical assessment of math competency among freshmen and sophomore en-gineering studentsDr. Kendrick T. Aung, Lamar University KENDRICK AUNG is a professor in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at Lamar University. He received his Ph.D. degree in Aerospace Engineering from University of Michigan in 1996. He is an active member of ASEE, ASME, SAE, AIAA and Combustion Institute. He has published over 70 technical papers and presented several papers at national and international conferences.Dr. Ryan Underdown, Lamar University Dr. Underdown is an Associate Professor in the Industrial Engineering
pathways for working professionals and develops a locally-educated engineeringworkforce in support of the regional power industry. The power system protection laboratory isa critical feature of these two programs.In 2009, the IEEE Power System Relaying Committee (PSRC) established goals for protectionlaboratory curriculum.8 Following the goal of the PSRC for universities to adopt an educationmodel to successfully prepare students for industry, we established laboratory objectives for ourprotection laboratory to create a smooth transition from education to industry employment.8,9,10Power system protection is a rich and dense subject, and at PSU the course topics are coveredduring a fast-paced, ten week lecture series; time spent conducting
independent of the curriculum as is the case with English language?2) Is there a preference in core ICT tools ready to be integrated in the course to enhance students experience?3) Is there any difference in ICT literacy according to the majoring our students choose? Answering these questions will provide us an overview on the approach our students have to theICTs. This overview will allow us to prepare a plan for integrating ITCś in the courses, beyondthe standard use of course related tools.Overview of the Collected DataData Collection Methodology The data was collected using an on-line questionnaire during the first term of 2012. It washosted on a free server dedicated to surveys. Students completed the survey during a 30 minutesperiod in
justification for defining theTCEP as a high priority strategic enabler and cultural acceptance as paramount to the life of theorganization. The absence of knowledge applications relegates the TCEP to simply a set ofacademic exercises with a much lesser value to the organization.Career development integration addresses the benefit to the employee. Learning is work. Andlearning to apply is even harder work. So there needs to be a reward system in place to providethe incentive to learn. One big incentive is an advanced degree. But this alone will not realize thepotential gains without integrating the learning into career path development. Page
USB-6009 multifunction DAQ were chosen as astarting platform given the graphical programming environment, readily available tutorials, andintegration with the hardware. Students were shown demonstrations involving simplebreadboard circuits before the students worked in small groups to replicate and extend theLabVIEW code and breadboard wiring to include both measurements and control circuits. Aftercompleting the breadboard exercises with LabVIEW and the USB DAQ, students wereintroduced to the Arduino 1.0 Integrated Development Environment (IDE) and an Arduino Unomicrocontroller. As a high level programming language, students viewed the Arduino sketchesas easy to follow given a limited introduction in lecture and access to the Arduino website
new curriculum, requires an extensive administrative initiative. Itwould necessitate entering a bureaucratic maze involving obtaining both internal and externalpermissions and approvals which usually take years to complete with no guarantee of finalapproval. Furthermore, budget and funding requirements for such an endeavor makes it veryunrealistic considering the current economic and political conditions of the state, country, andthe world. The second option is less cumbersome and more attractive in lieu of the problemsfaced with the first option. This is the option we have undertaken.Selecting Proper DisciplineThe School of Engineering (SOE) at Morgan State University (MSU) has four degree grantingdepartments; Electrical and Computer
graduates in the department of engineering and technology at WCU,developing an emphasis in electric power engineering plays a vital role in educating the nextgeneration of the region’s power industry workforce.To that end, an undergraduate curriculum development effort was planned and is projected totrain, prepare for research, and educate the students enrolled in the Department of Engineeringand Technology for careers in the power industry. The curriculum includes three fundamentalpower engineering courses: 1. Power Systems 2. Power Electronics 3. Electrical Machines and DrivesThis paper describes in detail the first pilot implementation of the Power Systems coursecomponent entitled “Modern Power Systems Analysis” for Electrical and