discounted cash flows to 18. I have improved my ability to function onvalue project and investment alternatives. multidisciplinary teams.7. Evaluate engineering project and investment alternatives using rate of 19. I have improved my understanding ofreturn methods such as IRR, B/C analysis, and payback period. professional and ethical responsibility.8. I am able to analyze various methods of depreciation and influence of 20. I have improved my understanding of thedepreciation on investment tax alternatives. impact of engineering solutions in a global and9. I am able to
that will demonstrate their leadership proficiency tofuture employers and graduate schools.Elective courses are a compilation of pre-approved courses from various academic disciplines.These courses are categorized into four concentrations (communication; ethics; creativity andinnovation; and global and societal impact) with students taking courses in one or twoconcentration areas. The selection of these concentrations is a result of research about otherengineering leadership programs and availability of course options across the university. Thecommunication concentration courses focus on the development of students' professional skillsand engagement with technical and non-technical audiences. The ethics concentration coursesalign with
the electrical and/or mechanicalengineering disciplines.Elect team leader. The students elected a team leader based on popular vote. The team leaderselected was known for his maturity, work ethic and demonstrated leadership skills. The primaryfunction of the team leader was to coordinate all aspects of the project, maintain the projectschedule, and maintain team cohesiveness and unity.Establish requirements. Given a brief description of the project, the design team elected tomeet with the user to discuss specific project requirements. For the following list ofrequirements were set: - Maintain temperature at 150 oF +/- 5oF - Maintain temperature for up to 120 hours (5 days) - Provide capacity for multiple (12) 6” x 12” cylinder samples
-rounded education that declares, “We are Marquette” has beenestablished. Students start with courses in rhetoric (6 credits) and mathematical and logicalreasoning (3 credits). Then they take basic theology, ethics and human nature courses (with need6 credits of theology and 6 in ethics and human nature required). Students then add courses inscience and nature, individual and social behavior, literature and performing arts, histories ofcultures and societies, and diverse cultures (with three credits required in each area.TotalsThe Core of Common Studies is completed by taking: 6 credits of Rhetoric 3 credits of Mathematical Reasoning 3 credits of Literature and Performing Arts 3 credits of Histories of Cultures and Societies 3
problems. Examples are Ohm’s Law to analyzea simple circuit, energy transformation and conservation for projects involving dropping objectsor projectile motion, or chemical reactions to evaluate soil or water contamination. The goals ofthis class are similar to those of other first-year engineering courses: Summarize the steps of the engineering design process Apply basic physics concepts to the design and analysis of built systems Apply teamwork skills and resolve team conflict Write a simple engineering report and present the report orally Use tools such as spreadsheets, programming, and CAD software to support engineering design and analysis Use ethical reasoning to address to evaluate ethical dilemmas Explain principles
. … they learn to be engineers by applying their textbook learning to complex projects-by doing their work as students the way real engineers do their work. They work on projects at every level in their program of study, from …steam engine models in their first engineering classes, to industrially-sponsored projects …in their capstone classes. Page 23.369.2 …WKU engineers not only master technical skills and knowledge, but also acquire and hone professional skills such as teamwork, communication, and ethical professional behavior.The Mechanical Engineering faculty at WKU have developed, implemented, assessed
. Faculty can reviewC-I course requirements on a university website and then submit documentation via that websiteto receive the C-I designation. The requirements for C-I certification are • Use of informal communication for learning and formal communication for sharing ideas publicly • Emphases on at least 2 of 4 modes • Student/faculty ratio of no greater than 35:1 • Focus on genres and audiences appropriate to the discipline or profession • Dedication to effective communication techniques • Use of draft-feedback-revision process • 40% of course grade based on communication work • Ethical and professional standards for all class workFaculty members teaching these courses give students direct feedback on
this level spend a majority of their time developing this skill or learning how to access other people’s perspective. Many learners are at this stage during the middle of their collegiate career. • Independent Knowing – Individuals view most knowledge as being uncertain. They begin to think for themselves and make decisions based on their own understandings and beliefs. Some students reach this level toward the end of college. • Contextual Knowing – Individuals generate knowledge based on the context on which evidence supporting the knowledge is used. Very few students obtain this level before they graduate. [24]C. Scheme of Intellectual and Ethical Development A team of Harvard
and Communication Systems 5. Fiber Optics 6. Electronics 7. Power Systems 8. National Electrical Code 9. Data Analysis 10. Computer Engineering 11. Ethical Issues in EngineeringA main consideration while preparing these topics was that the focus of the course was not tomake the students understand all the details from each topic. Instead, the objective was to exposethem to these topics by keeping in mind that most of them do not possess the necessaryknowledge on calculus and differential equations. Based on the amount of exposure that thestudent will receive on each of the topics, either two or three weeks were allocated for eachtopic. In addition to the two hours of lectures per week a three-hour laboratory was preformedonce a
experience the benefits that will last alifetime. (3)III. The Mentor as a FriendSome academics believe and advice strongly in maintaining a business-like relationshipbetween mentors and mentees. They claim that: a professor should not have any casualrelationships with students, and such relationships “conflict with our fundamentalobligations as faculty members,(4) and the ethics of the relationship require that thefaculty member remains “dispassionate,” avoiding any appearance of partiality. Thefaculty member should “not seek to be their psychiatrist, friend, or lover.” (5) While someof us may agree about the psychiatrist and lover part, many of us do not agree thatfriendship between students and faculty members has ill effects and should not
, teamwork and other professionalskills, and are forced to learn “on the job.”2,11-13 Skills outlined by ABET criteria further reflectthe necessity for integrating such attributes in engineering education, including: (a) an ability toapply knowledge of mathematics, science, and engineering; (b) an ability to design and conductexperiments, as well as to analyze and interpret data; (c) an ability to design a system,component, or process to meet desired needs within realistic constraints such as economic,environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability, and sustainability;(d) an ability to function on multidisciplinary teams; (e) an ability to identify, formulate, andsolve engineering problems; (f) an understanding of
interested in transferring to a bachelor’s program in engineering.The purpose of the course is to introduce potential Grove students to the practice of engineering Page 23.249.4research in the engineering disciplines the school offers. The course consists of a group researchassignment, lab and library visits, guest lectures on engineering ethics and statistics, groupreports and presentations, math tutoring, and writing exercises analyzing a research article andexploring a research problem. A program description is provided in appendix 2. The studentswere recruited by Grove’s office of student programs using its contacts in many communitycolleges and
education.Dr. Barbara B. Kawulich, University of West Georgia Dr. Barbara Kawulich is Interim Director of the Evaluation Center and Associate Professor of Research in the Educational Technology and Foundations Department at the University of West Georgia. She teaches qualitative and action research, ethics, leadership, and diversity to graduate and undergraduate students. Her research focuses on research methods, research pedagogy, and issues related to indigenous women. She has authored numerous publications on these topics and has co-authored two books on research methods.Prof. P.K. Raju, Mechanical Engineering Dept, Auburn University,Al Dr. Raju is the Thomas Walter Distinguished Professor of Mechanical Engineering at
and computer engineering programs areidentical to the ABET a-k outcomes of the ABET 2012-2013 accreditation cycle as listed below.1 (a) an ability to apply knowledge of mathematics, science, and engineering (b) an ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as to analyze and interpret data (c) an ability to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs within realistic constraints such as economic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability, and sustainability (d) an ability to function on multidisciplinary teams (e) an ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems (f) an understanding of professional and ethical
visual communication. 5. function effectively both individually and on teams. 6. be able to identify, analyze, and solve problems creatively through sustained critical investigation. 7. be able to make connections between disciplines and to integrate information from multiple sources. 8. be aware of how their decisions affect and are affected by other individuals separated by time, space, and culture. 9. be aware of personal, societal, and professional ethical standards. Page 23.874.4 10. have the skills, diligence, and commitment to excellence needed to engage in lifelong learning.The two required
of the school of engineering at Nazarbayev University. 36 studentsparticipated in this elective in a semester that was otherwise uniform for all second yearengineering students. The course was then offered as an elective for first year students in theirsecond semester starting in the 2012-13 academic year. 100 students enrolled in the course in itssecond offering. The aim of this course is to act as an introduction to engineering ethics whilealso exploring the societal impact of engineering projects and developing written and verbalcommunications skills. At the successful completion of this course, students are expected to beable to: evaluate and explain the position and responsibilities of the engineer in relation to industry
, environmental, ethical and global issuesin product design10,11, 12). There are also examples of broadening design methodologies bycreating products that may used by people with the widest range of abilities (e.g. people withdisabilities) and operating within widest possible operating conditions 13). Page 23.714.2In the spring of 2006, a junior year level Product and Tool Design course was deliveredconcurrently with appropriate complementing courses from Manufacturing Engineering, andMarketing departments. This initial effort of developing and delivering interdisciplinary coursehas been quite successful. The details of this work were reported in ASEE
and Shells 3 31 16 78 13 66A7. Properties & Behavior of CE Materials 6 66 47 97 23 81A8. Numerical Methods 3 44 13 56 9 66 E. Management and Professional ToolsE1. Design Office Organization/Management/Office Ethics 0 19 34 94 0 48E2. Business Development and Practices 0 10 22 81 0
Education Oral and Written Communications Ethics and Professional ConductMSSE Admission RequirementsThe entrance requirements for the MSSE Program include: • GPA > 3.0 • Letter of Purpose • Two recommendation letters • Official TranscriptsFor applicants with a Bachelor’s degree that is not in engineering, physics, or math:21 credit hours of junior/senior/graduate level engineering leveling courses are requiredbefore an application to the program will be considered, with 3.0 GPA or greater forthese leveling courses required. Because Systems Engineering is an inter-disciplinaryfield, the leveling courses may be from any department or mix of departments. Exampleleveling courses from the IMSE Department
can address a wide variety of community needs.); 3. Structured reflection on the service activity to gain further understanding of course content, a broader appreciation of the discipline, and an enhanced sense of civic responsibility15, 16.Service learning is a necessary aspect of engineering education. Globally, there is an increasingsense of social consciousness making it progressively more important for engineering students tounderstand the effects of their work as engineers17. Studies have shown that service learningresults in greater ethical and moral development, increasing student initiative and engagement18,19 . Following Vanasupa‘s Four Domain Development Diagram (4DDD), service learning allowsthe student to
finding ajob and initiating a career. Topics included networking, participating in career fairs, researchingprospective employers, writing a resume, crafting an audience-driven cover letter, interviewing,using social media strategically, using the career center’s resources effectively, applyingprofessional ethics, and learning best practices in today's marketplace. The course requiredunusual collaboration and cooperation among the instructor, university career center staff, andengineering school administrators. Assignments and deliverables were coordinated with thecareer center’s on-campus recruiting activities and resources.This paper describes the first semester of the course, its rationale and development, collaborativeefforts, lessons learned
production laboratory prior to the 2010-11 academicyear to the current R&D focus starting in 2010-11 had a significant impact on some of the courseobjectives. The course objectives are listed in Table 1 for the production laboratory, the 2010-11 Page 23.730.10transition year, and the most recent year. Examination of the table shows that this was anevolutionary process where the objectives were adjusted to meet the new requirements. Inaddition to the transition of the capstone course we added a 2 credit course on Contracts, Patents,and Ethics in this time frame to both strengthen our program upon the advice of our IndustrialAdvisory Board and to
Milking the Rhino Innovation Showcase maintains a playlist of all student videosfor each year of the contest. All videos are publicly available for 2009, 2010, and 2011.In this paper, I analyze five videos from the 2011 Milking the Rhino Innovation Showcase.These videos received the top monetary awards available. I selected these videos because theoriginal judges thought these videos best responded to the challenge of the Milking the RhinoInnovation Showcase. The Milking the Rhino Innovation Showcase has five learning domains:1) Appreciation of Indigenous Knowledge, 2) Ethics Education, 3) Non-Travel Based GlobalExperience, 4) User Centered Design, and 5) Frugal Innovation and Entrepreneurship.33 The useof the Milking the Rhino documentary to
Paper ID #6643The Teaching Circle for Large Engineering Courses: Clearing the ActivationBarrierDr. Cynthia J. Finelli, University of Michigan Dr. Cynthia Finelli is Director of the Center for Research on Learning and Teaching Engineering and research associate professor in the College of Engineering at the University of Michigan. She actively pursues research in engineering education and assists other faculty at U-M in their scholarly endeavors. Her current research interests include studying faculty motivation to change classroom practices, evalu- ating methods to improve teaching, and exploring ethical decision-making
groups or team projects. 5. Demonstrate an ability to understand professional, ethical and social responsibilities, including the impacts of culture, diversity, and interpersonal relations. 6. Demonstrate proficiency in communicating technical information in formal reports, documentation, and presentations to users and information technology professionals. 7. Demonstrate the ability to identify and analyze the impacts of information technologies and computing on public, organizations, and individuals. 8. Demonstrate the ability to identify and apply current and emerging technologies and tools for information technologies solutions. 9. Demonstrate expertise in the core information technologies data base
provide an update on the project and to receive feedbackfrom the project mentor. The project progress and tasks were tracked at each DR. The objectivesof the LR were to address topics related to the engineering professional development. At each Page 23.1388.3LR, the team discussed teamwork skills, engineering ethics, engineering design process, andcontextualization.3.3 Technical learningUnlike traditional design courses, where technical learning (i.e. coursework) may not be relatedto the design project, the idea behind project-based learning is to facilitate learning using designprojects. The team used this project to facilitate the learning of
f on waste, w the seecond encourraged studennts to explore an [8]idea brouught forth by y Cynthia Baarnett whicch she termeed a “water eethic”. In new winterdisciiplinary grou ups, studentss were askedd to create twwo deliverabbles that thouughtfullyinvestigaated how a water w ethic might m be inspired in the loocal commuunity. The deeliverables w weresimilar to o the first deesign challen nge in that twwo visual reppresentationss were expeccted. First, anndslightly different d from m the
, Whiting, & Shaeiwitz, Analysis, Synthesis, and Design of Chemical Page 23.675.8 Processes, Prentice Hall, 2012 Ulrich, Product Design and Development, McGraw Hill, 2011Figure 7 illustrates the distribution of adoption of capstone design texts reported by surveyrespondents.The use of textbooks amongst instructors is diverse. Some rely on personal experience and usetexts as reference material (if at all). Others seek more case studies, details on methodologies(especially heuristics), and more coverage of ethics, safety, and environment. 25 Number of respondents 20
feel strongly thatthey are helping the communities and that their experiences could change the type of volunteerwork some students pursue in the future.IntroductionTo be fully prepared for a professional career in the engineering field requires students todevelop different types of skills. According to ABET, engineering baccalaureate graduatesshould possess a set of five “hard” skills and a set of six professional skills3,4,5. The professionalskills, outlined below, are skills that employers desire from engineering professionals.(1) an ability to function on multidisciplinary teams(2) an understanding of professional and ethical responsibility(3) an ability to communicate effectively(4) the broad education necessary to understand the impact of
knowledge of mathematics, science, and engineering • Ability to analyze and interpret data • Ability to design system, and process to meet the desired needs with realistic constraints such economic, environmental, social, health and safety, and sustainability • Ability to work in multidisciplinary teams • Knowledge of the current issues • Understanding professional and ethical responsibilityThe Governors program is a five week residential program and the engineering focus areadirectly hits on various ABET outcomes, that most of the engineering curriculum is designedupon.IntroductionThe Governor's Scholars Program is a summer residential program for outstanding high schoolstudents in Kentucky who are rising seniors. The Program