ofresults includes faculty observations of student learning experiences.BackgroundThe STEM scholarship is awarded on a competitive basis with an emphasis on selecting studentsto form a diverse cohort. The intention is to create a group of scholars representing differentSTEM majors, academic years, gender, race, socioeconomic background, and culturalexperience. Scholars are awarded a $5,000 scholarship (providing significant tuition assistance)which is renewable for up to three years. These scholarships are funded by a National ScienceFoundation S-STEM grant and the selected students must have demonstrated financial need andan eligible declared major (Mathematics, Biology, Chemistry, Physics, Information Technology;Electrical, Computer, Civil
modified to include recently developed and publicized concepts ofLean Startup13,14 and Business Model Canvas15 (BMC). As a result instead of a full-blownBusiness Plan students were asked to develop an abridged business model using BMC approachand then verify its assumptions by performing multiple interviews with potential customers. Anexample business model in BMC format is shown in Fig. 4. • Internet provider(s) o Affordability o Design o Design o Manufacturing o Students living • Component o Manufacturing o Durability manufacturers o Space
, and the temperature is controller. The high sensitivity Company A cannot exceed 20°C modulated by an ethanol cooling thermocouple can be or the material will spontaneously stream which spirals around the approximated as a first order combust and eradicate a 3 mile tank. We found that as an isolated system with the following transfer radius around the transporting truck. Company B cannot use the system, the open loop response of function: g(s) = 0.995
pressure at the point where the nozzle attaches to the 3” hose is 50 psig. What is the force (in lbf) a fireman would have to exert to hold the nozzle stationary?Say this problem was given on a quiz and was worth 10 points. How many points should aninstructor deduct for each of the following student mistakes? • Sign error • Error entering numbers into calculator • Forgot factor of ½ in the Bernoulli equation for dynamic pressure • Left out the pressure force entirely • Used air density instead of water density • Unit conversion error, involving any of the following – 12 in = 1 ft, 1 min = 60 s, 1 Gal = 231 in3, 1 psi = 144 psf, 1 lbf = 32.2 lbm ft/s2 • Incorrect number of significant digitsThere would be a
presented in this paper are those of theauthors and do not necessarily represent those of the NSF.References[1] Lovell, M. D., Brophy, S. P., and Li, S. (2013). “Challenge-Based Instruction for a Civil Engineering DynamicsCourse,” Proceedings, 2013 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Atlanta, June 23-26, 2013.[2] CTGV, Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt (1997). The Jasper project: Lessons in curriculum, Page 24.1273.10instruction, assessment, and professional development, Mahwah, NJ, Erlbaum[3] R. J. Roselli and S. P. Brophy, “Effectiveness of challenge-based instruction in biomechanics,” J. Eng. Educ.,vol. 93, no. 4, pp
cl t s gn se t st ct h h ev s cl es s ys ys ys c g se et et en le le ra ra ra s rin si m
Paper ID #10633Ultra Low-Cost Software-Defined Radio: A Mobile Studio for Teaching Dig-ital Signal ProcessingDr. Cory J. Prust, Milwaukee School of Engineering Dr. Cory Prust is Assistant Professor in the Electrical Engineering and Computer Science Department at Milwaukee School of Engineering (MSOE). He earned his BSEE degree from MSOE in 2001 and his Ph.D. from Purdue University in 2006. Prior to joining MSOE in 2009, he was a Technical Staff member at MIT Lincoln Laboratory. He teaches courses in the signal processing and embedded systems areas.Dr. Steven Holland, Milwaukee School of Engineering Steven S. Holland (M ’13
. (2013, October 17). Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs, 2013 – 2014 [Online]. http://www.abet.org/DisplayTemplates/DocsHandbook.aspx?id=3149[2] E. Rushton et al., “Infusing Engineering into Public Schools” in Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, 2002 © American Society for Engineering Education[3] A. Bandura. Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control. New York: W.H. Freeman, 1997.[4] “The Condition of Education.” United States Department of Education: National Center for Education Statistics. Washington, D.C.: U. S. Government Printing Office, 2006.[5] S. Peirce-Cottler et al. (2007). “Designing a Medical Device to Extract Foreign Bodies from the Ear”. [Online
within the American University community forproviding their thoughts and insights throughout the various phases of this study.IX. Bibliography[1] http://www.aip.org/statistics/trends/reports/bachdemograph10.pdf, Accessed 18.10.13.[2] http://www.aip.org/statistics/trends/reports/bachdemograph10.pdf, Accessed 19.10.13.[3] Rosser, S. V. (Ed.). (1995). Teaching the majority: Breaking the gender barrier in science, mathematics, and engineering. New York: Teacher’s College Press.[4] National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine of the National Academies. (2007). Beyond bias and barriers: Fulfilling the potential of women in academic
enough investigation into this and other disciplines has not been done so as to be able tomake generalizable statements.Reference 1. Smith, K. A., Sheppard, S. D., Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2005). Pedagogies of engagement: Classroom-based practices. Journal of Engineering Education, 95(2), 123-138. 2. Chi, M. T. H. (2009). Active-constructive-interactive: A conceptual framework for differentiating learning activities. Topics in Cognitive Science, 1(1), 73-105. 3. Resta, P., & Laferrière, T. (2007). Technology in support of collaborative learning. Educational Psychology Review, 19(1), 65-83. 4. Roselli, R. J., & Brophy, S. P. (2006). Experiences with formative assessment in
pedagogical approach, CE most strongly is connected to service-learning (S-L). ThoughFurco (2003) stated that at least two hundred different definitions of service-learning have beenpublished, the distinguishing factor of between S-L and community-service is that S-L isintentionally designed to meet learning (often academic) objectives. Other components commonin service-learning definitions include 1) the need for student reflection on the value of the effort,2) the connection and integration of the effort with the community, and 3) the attainment byparticipants of the desirable outcome of civic or social responsibility.The benefits of CE projects are well documented in the literature13, 27. A longitudinal study on
work. Italso may have been due in part to his appropriation of Ms. W.’s warning to expect that theirproduct would change. However, none of Bobby’s group members elaborated or seemed to sharehis uncertainty. Also noteworthy is that Isabel took the opportunity to broach a subject that wasbecoming contentious – who was project manager – perhaps bringing it up in front of an adultfor a measure of safety in addressing a relational difficulty.As to how the feedback they received during the first design critique session shaped this group’ssocial interaction, findings indicate a decrease in students’ focus on social-relational issues asmembers became more task-focused after receiving negative feedback. No social topics weretaken up post critique
Paper ID #10282Feasibility of interactive eTextbooks with computationally intense contentDr. Jacques C. Richard, Texas A&M University Dr. Richard got his Ph. D. at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, 1989 & a B. S. at Boston University, 1984. He was at NASA Glenn, 1989-1995, taught at Northwestern for Fall 1995, worked at Argonne National Lab, 1996-1997, Chicago State, 1997-2002. Dr. Richard is a Sr. Lecturer & Research Associate in Aerospace Engineering @ Texas A&M since 1/03. His research is focused on computational plasma modeling using spectral and lattice Boltzmann methods for studying plasma turbulence
sum of all values𝑐=0 // A variable to store the lost low-order bitsfor 𝑖 = 0 to num −1 do 𝑦 = 𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑎𝑦[𝑖] − 𝑐 𝑡 =𝑆+𝑦 // If S is big and y is small, low-order digits of y are lost 𝑐 = (𝑡 − 𝑆) − 𝑦 // c recovers the low-order digits of y 𝑆=𝑡end for Page 24.627.53. FPAvisual SoftwareFPAvisual was developed to provide engaging visualizations that show the inaccuracies causedby FPA, their significant influence on programs, and the techniques to increase the accuracy. Ithas Windows and Linux versions. FPAvisual consists of four components: Roots, Pentagon
engineering fields (e.g. mechanical, environmental, orelectrical) through design challenges targeted for specific grade levels, contextualized in aparticular country (e.g. India, USA, or El Salvador), and set in a elementary aged child’s story13.Some researchers are analyzing the impact of these resources for integrating engineering intoelementary curricula16-18. For example, Karatas and colleagues19 performed a phenomenographic Page 24.270.4study with 20 sixth-grade students to understand elementary students’ views about engineeringand its differences compared to science. For this, researchers collected student interviews anddrawings of engineer(s
students engage in course content and motivatethem to try harder, but faculty also have the power to weaken student engagement. Thefollowing are possible implications for faculty as a result of our analyses. a. To facilitate students’ sense of belonging and motivation to participate in class, an instructor can implement the following ideas that require minor effort on the part of the instructor: i. Learn student names or simply recognize if students have been attending class, asking questions, working hard, etc. ii. Tell students explicitly during class that s/he cares that students learn the course material. iii. Encourage students to attend office hours if/when they need
curricular pedagogy. Further in-depth researches are needed with 11 more appropriate samples having focus on discerning the impact and significance of differentscaffolding attributes on learning outcomes.ReferencesAcademies, N. A. o. E. o. t. N. (2005). Educating the Engineer of 2020: Adapting Engineering Education to the New Century: The National Academies Press.Ambrose, S. A., Bridges, M. W., DiPietro, M., Lovett, M. C., & Norman, M. K. (2010). How learning works: Seven research-based principles for smart teaching: John Wiley & Sons.Anderson, K. J. B., Courter, S. S., McGlamery, T., Nathans-Kelly, T. M., & Nicometo, C. G. (2010). Understanding engineering work
on defining STEM integration and investigating its power for student learning. She is creating and testing innovative, interdisciplinary curricular approaches that engage students in developing models of real world problems and their so- lutions. Her research also involves working with educators to shift their expectations and instructional practice to facilitate effective STEM integration. Tamara is the recipient of a 2012 Presidential Early Career Award for Scientists and Engineers (PECASE) for her work on STEM integration with underrep- resented minority and underprivileged urban K-12 students.Dr. Senay Purzer, Purdue University, West Lafayette S¸enay Purzer an Assistant Professor in the School of Engineering
: http://www.abet.org/uploadedFiles/Accreditation/Accreditation_Process/Accreditation_Documents/Current/ea c-criteria-2012-2013.pdf..2 M. W. Ohland, M. L. Loughry, D. J. Woehr, L. G. Bullard, R. M. Felder, C. J. Finelli, R. M. Layton, H. L. Pomeranz and D. G. Schmucker, "The Comprehensive Assessment of Team Member Effectiveness: Development of a Behaviourally Anchored Rating Scale for Self and Peer Evaluation," Academy of Management Learning and Education, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 609-630, 2012.3 J. McGourty and K. P. DeMeuse, The Team Developer: An Assessment and Skill Building Program Student Guidebook, New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons Inc., 2001.4 S. Loddington, K. Pond, N. Wilkinson and P. Willmot, "A case study of
- 306.25. Segalàs, J., D. Ferrer-Balas, and K.F. Mulder, What do engineering students learn in sustainability courses? The effect of the pedagogical approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2010. 18(3): p. 275-284.26. Carey, S., Knowledge Acquisition: Enrichment or Conceptual Change?, in The epigenesis of mind, S. Carey and R. Gelman, Editors. 1991, Erlbaum: Hillsdale, NJ. p. 257-291.27. Chi, M.T.H., Three Types of Conceptual Change: Belief Revision, Mental Model Transformation, and Categorical Shift, in Handbook of Research on Conceptual Change, S. Vosniadou, Editor. 2008, Erlbaum: Hillsdale, NJ.28. Craig, S., M.T.H. Chi, and K. VanLehn, Improving classroom learning by collaboratively observing human tutoring
and may offer insights into their futuretrajectory. STEM students and faculty thinking about their career trajectories (e.g. whether topursue a job in a research university vs. bachelor’s only institution in light of balancing withfamily responsibilities) may also benefit from the findings of this study.Our data come from the National Study of Postsecondary Faculty (NSOPF). NSOPF includesfaculty member and institutional data. Our dataset for this study contains data from 1993 and2004, which is the last year the NSOPF was administered. These two years were selectedbecause FMLA was passed in 1993. NSOPF 1993's data collection started in 1992 and cantherefore serve as a baseline of the patterns of policy distribution before FMLA’simplementation
. Government WorkplaceAbstractThis paper reports the results of a quantitative, nonexperimental, cross-sectional, one-time, web-based survey on the career self-efficacy1 of self-selected black engineers in the engineeringworkplace—a workplace that has been described as a “haven of whiteness and masculinity”3,p.14and “pale” and “male”4,p.86. Engineering has been a key component of the U.S.’s globaltechnological superiority. However, U.S. racial demographics are changing. The number ofwhites currently in the workforce and the number of whites entering the workforce will decreaseover the next several decades. Given current college and university graduation rates by race, thenumber of underrepresented minority engineers is not on a path to maintain the
Paper ID #9097Why I Am an Engineering Major: A Cross-Sectional Study of Undergradu-ate StudentsDr. Louis Nadelson, Boise State University Louis S. Nadelson is an associate professor in the College of Education at Boise State University, with a PhD in educational psychology from UNLV. His scholarly interests include all areas of STEM teaching and learning, inservice and preservice teacher professional development, program evaluation, multidis- ciplinary research, and conceptual change. Nadelson uses his over 20 years of high school and college math, science, and engineering teaching to frame his research on STEM teaching
through guided activities and assignments. After class, assignments are completed andstudents prepare for the next class. Table 2: Typical Inverted Class Day ScheduleBefore Class In Class After Class• Preparation activity: Reading, • Short lecture • Finish application assignments, • Activities Page 24.1389.3 video, tutorial, or problem(s) open lab• Evaluation: online quiz or turned • Application assignments or lab • Prepare for next class in solutionThe
development for faculty in their respective area(s) of expertise is imperative for theviability of any academic program and the success of the institution of higher education [1].Professors are expected to understand the subject(s) that they teach and understand how to applythe material to real-world scenarios. While research suggests that most faculty members “areinherently self-driven learners” [1], some academic disciplines, such a pharmacy education, useaccreditation councils that specifically advocate an effective continuing professionaldevelopment program [1]. This paper posits that one of the most effective ways for engineeringand technology faculty to obtain continuing professional development is through active andcontinual engagement with
function forthe PID controller can be represented by Equation (3) K D s 2 K props K I K GPID K prop I sK D , (3) s s where Kprop is the proportional constant, KI is the integral constant, and KD is the derivativeconstant. A discrete PID controller can be implemented through MATLAB simulation as in (4)[13], r(k ) r(k 1) K1e(k ) K 2 e(k 1) K3e(k 2) (4)where e command K1 K prop K I t K D / t
analysis.Ed Moran, Western Washington University RF and Instrumentation technician from San Jose area, supporting Western Washington Univ.’s Electron- ics Engineering Technology Dept.Jeremy Ruhland, Western Washington University Jeremy Ruhland is an electrical engineering technology student from Western Washington University in Bellingham, WA. Eir interests include electromechanics, robotics, communications and embedded sys- tems. Ey is also head electrical engineer of the WWU Marine Technology Club, which builds underwater remotely operated vehicles for the MATE ROV competition. Page 24.88.1
designdifficulty of the selected design element(s), and the need to generate team interactions. Teamassignments can also be adjusted during the course so that all teams have an equivalent workload. If a particular design component becomes easier than anticipated to design then anadditional component can be added to the design team’s the scope-of-work. Or if a teamstruggles with the completion of their design, the instructor could provide additional informationto move the design along.The ability to select the project months prior to the beginning of the course eliminates therequirement of locating a local practice design professional, an engineering firm, and anacceptable project or the need to fabricate a project and supporting data. This
. Page 24.437.7Bibliography1. Micceri T, Wajeeh E. The Influence of Geographical Location and Application to Multiple Institutions on Recruitment. BPA-IR technical report, USF, Tampa, FL. Available on the WWW (http://isis. fastmail. usf. edu/surveys/Studies/). 1998.2. Price IF, Matzdorf F, Smith L, Agahi H. The impact of facilities on student choice of university. Facilities. 2003;21(10):212-222.3. Rocca SJ, Washburn SG. Factors influencing college choice on high school and transfer matriculants into a college of agriculture. NACTA Journal. 2005;49(1):32-38.4. Briggs S. An exploratory study of the factors influencing undergraduate student choice: the case of higher education in Scotland. Studies in Higher
and other STEM majors. The research questions were: 1) Do teachers believe that they can influence their students’ choices of undergraduate major? 2) If teachers believe they can have such influence over their students what is/are the mechanism(s) of this influence? 3) To what extent do high school seniors intending to study engineering in college report that teachers’ instruction or advising influenced their choice of major?Method This research comprised two sample populations: 1) in-service teachers participating insummer professional development programs (including RET), and 2) high school seniors fromaround the country who planned on attending college within a year of graduation. During