Paper ID #11986Effect of Comfort Zone on Entrepreneurship Potential, Innovation Culture,and Career SatisfactionDr. Ikhlaq Sidhu, University of California, Berkeley Ikhlaq Sidhu is the Chief Scientist and Founding Director of UC Berkeley’s Center for Entrepreneurship & Technology. Prof. Sidhu also developed and founded the Fung Institute for Engineering Leadership. He received the IEOR Emerging Area Professor Award from his department at Berkeley. He has been granted over 60 US Patents in networking technology, IP telephony, and mobile computing. He was awarded 3Com Corporation’s ”Inventor of the Year” in 1999. Dr. Sidhu
Paper ID #12600Starter or Joiner, Market or Socially-Oriented: Predicting Career Choiceamong Undergraduate Engineering and Business StudentsMr. Florian Michael Lintl, Stanford University Florian is studying Environmental Planning and Ecological Engineering at the Technical University of Munich (TUM). His majors are Sustainable City Development, Renewable Energy, International Land Use Planning and Environmental Economics. He is also participant in the Entrepreneurial Qualification Program ”Manage&More”. This is a program of the Center for Innovation and Business Creation at the TU Munich (”UnternehmerTUM”) which
explored why some engineering alumni who co-founded or started a company in the pastmay no longer have an entrepreneurial interest. A logistic regression was conducted to explorewhat variables were the most important in predicting a student’s intention and interest inpursuing entrepreneurial activities.Three research questions guided this study: 1. How do engineering alumni with high intentions and high interest in pursuing entrepreneurial activities compare with peers with low entrepreneurial intention and interest in terms of demographics, career-related characteristics, self-confidence and interest in technical concepts and problems? 2. What factors influence alumni’s interest in and intention to pursue
and data products developed by Fujitsu. Along with Yau Chow Ching, Rodney conceived (and wrote the standards for), the SONET (Synchronous Optical Network) architecture, which served as the base for today’s North American telephone network. Rodney was Chairman of the T1X1 Technical Sub- Committee (the organization responsible for SONET standardization) from 1990 through 1994. He has been active in SONET’s National and International Standardization since 1985. In addition, Rodney has published numerous papers and presentations on SONET. Rodney began his career with Fujitsu Network Communications in 1989 as the Director of Strategic Plan- ning. He also held the positions of Director of Transport Product Planning, Vice
, ecosystems, careers, diversity and curriculum. This round ofcategorization was done by two investigators sequentially; first one investigator, then theother (working from the first investigator’s coding), followed by discussion to come toagreement.This second round of coding was refined by revisiting actual worksheets to better understandthe context of questions, going back to some of the question-authors for clarification, andallowing for classification not just of complete questions, but also the larger issues embeddedin some of the questions.4.2 Key Themes IdentifiedFive themes emerged from categorizing the 46 questions that were written by Summitattendees in the “Re-search” session. These are: 1) Educational Aims, 2) Students Are Not Allthe Same
Page 26.990.3global leader of innovation.Colleges of Engineering across the country and the globe are experiencing this reality. Feweryoung people enroll in engineering programs than in the past, and many who do either drop outof such programs at a high rate or become dissatisfied with their career options and seekemployment in other professions after graduating.8 The 2002 report, Engage to Excel, indicatesthat increasing retention is the most efficient way to boost STEM graduates, and identifies keychanges engineering faculty members can make to their curriculum and teaching to fosterretention. Key is the need for intellectual and personal engagement, something often stifled byuninspiring courses and unwelcoming faculty.7 Retention also
and studies: 1. Program-Level Assessment: The baseline survey shown in Appendix C will be administered to entering freshmen before they have completed any online module. Psychological measurement theory suggests that lengthy questionnaires can lead to low response rates and distorted responses due to fatigue.10,11 Therefore, the survey was designed to be concise with 37 items. Students’ general entrepreneurial mindset such as the intellectual and exploratory curiosity levels, interests and experiences in entrepreneurship, career goals, etc. will be measured through 12 items. The learning outcomes of the 18 online modules will be measured through 25 items, with one or at most two
Paper ID #11576The ”T-Shaped” EngineerDr. Peter Rogers, The Ohio State University Dr. Peter Rogers, Professor of Practice Engineering Education Innovation Center The Ohio State Univer- sity Columbus, OH 43210 Rogers.693@osu.edu Rogers joined the university in October, 2008 bringing with him 35 years of industrial experience. His career includes senior leadership roles in engineering, sales, and manufacturing, developing products us- ing multidisciplinary teams to convert customer needs to commercially viable products and services. He brings this experience to the university where he leads the effort in developing
, Entrepreneurship, and a Flipped Classroom Experience Abstract Graduates in chemical engineering pursue a wide variety of careers and, in today’s businessenvironment, technical proficiency is required but no longer sufficient to ensure success. Well-developed problem-solving skills and the ability to describe, convey, and sell those solutions toupper management is a must. The pace of business has also increased – higher productivity,shorter design turns, and global competition mean that successful engineers must be self-starters,seek out opportunities for improvements, and have an entrepreneurial mindset. Our currentcapstone design experience fails to fully prepare our graduates for these challenges. Currently,the course focuses on technical design
Assessment of the Rose-Hulman Leadership AcademyAbstractGiving students the ability to be entrepreneurial leaders is a potentially valuable outcome for anengineering program. Entrepreneurial leadership consists of communication, teamwork, andproblem solving skills that are important to careers in STEM fields, including engineering. Forengineering, in particular, entrepreneurship and leadership skills relate directly to accreditationoutcomes that every undergraduate engineering program must address. In this study, we describethe assessment of a three day leadership academy program at a small, technical school in theMidwestern United States. Activities in the academy consisted of seminars on leadership stylesand communication comingled with problem
Funded Jump Start Grant 9-credit Program in Start-Up Trek’s Entrepreneurship Pitch Competitions Student Incubator Mentoring Start-up Career Fair Student Entrepreneurial Organizations Figure 1. Co-Curricular Experiences Supported by the Center for Entrepreneurship. Institutional Support Start-‐Up Treks Student
Materials Technology at the Instituto Federal de Educac¸a˜ o, Ciˆencia e Tecnologia da Bahia. He is a mechanical engineer and holds a Bachelor’s degree in law and a Master’s degree in mechanical engineering. He has been teaching at different levels, from the first year of technical high school to the final year of mechatronic engineering course, since 1995. He also has considerable experience in the design and implementation of mechatronic and production engineering courses. His non-academic career is centered on product development and manufacturing processes.Prof. M. D. Wilson, Purdue University, West Lafayette M.D. WILSON is a lecturer for the Krannert School of Management, the entrepreneur-in-residence for the
of these pedagogical interventions to enhance the innovation capacity of the students.We derive our findings by analyzing data collected as a part of the Educate to Innovate projectthat was initiated to understand what factors contribute to the success of innovators, and howthese factors can be incorporated into our education system. Charles Vest, the former presidentof the National Academy of Engineering (NAE), appointed an advisory committee for the projectwho provided guidance to this research team at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign(UIUC) who would interview a select group of successful American innovators and ask them toreflect on their education and careers, and to identify factors that contributed to them
graduation, but they arealso meant to attract a mix of what Graham (2014) describes as “career focused students” and“subject focused students”. Career-focused students are only likely to engage in an activity ifthey see how it can improve their employability, while subject-focused students have deepdisciplinary knowledge. Thirty-eight students from engineering, science, art, design, andbusiness registered and attended the event. Five students would drop out before the end of theevent due to various reasons. Although students could request team members, teams wererandomly constructed before the event to encourage interdisciplinary collaboration. Each teamcontained 1-2 technical students, 1 design or art student, and 1 business or non-technical
. Page 26.1401.5 Exhibit 4: Components of University Entrepreneurial Ecosystems Element of effective ecosystem Examples University-Led Entrepreneurship and Formal courses, programs, and spaces Innovation Activity Leadership and Institutional Governance Stated mission, presidential initiatives Tenure and promotion policies, support of Academic Culture and Careers faculty development Student-led and Grassroots Entrepreneurship and Innovation Activity Clubs, pitch competitions Regional and National
currently working on development sensors and actuators for use in extreme harsh environments such as Venus, Mars, deep-sea beds, and inside airplane gas turbine engines. His primary research project involves the development of a harsh environment sensor for radi- ation measurements on a new material platform, and to qualify its reliability during operation. Before being enrolled in the Ph. D. program, he worked on his M.S. from Stanford University in Mechanical Engineering with a focus on energy systems and combustion of jet fuels. Prior to starting his Stanford career, Ateeq was awarded his B.Sc. in Mechanical Engineering with a minor in Business Administration from the University of Arizona in 2010. Mr. Suria is
Effectively manage projects Character Discern and pursue ethical practices4. Thermodynamic Course Module4.1 OverviewStudents tackle an iterative, team-based design problem, where they are small start-up companiescompeting to build an electric-generating power plant. The project provides students not onlywith the understanding of how to apply electric-generating power plant theory, but also howdesign is integrated with, and influenced by, economic, socio-political, and environmentalfactors. These are all factors the entrepreneurially-minded engineer must be aware of, and keepin mind, throughout their career.4.2 DetailsThe work proposed here consists of an educational module designed for thermodynamics (a
significant international business and project experience. He has served on the Board of Directors of the AIST, worked on several committees in professional societies, and is a member of AIST, ASM, TMS, Sigma Xi and ASEE. He has authored 28 technical papers on a wide range of activities in materials science, including education, innovation management, environmental issues, nano-materials, steelmaking, casting, plasma and alternate iron technologies and authored a book on the Horizontal Continuous Casting of Steel.Dr. J F Whitacre, Carnegie Mellon Univerisity Professor Whitacre started his career at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, where he worked on energy tech- nologies ranging from functional materials to systems
the areas of innovation andentrepreneurship. These students will start their career with an edge over other engineeringstudents because they will be able to launch businesses successfully by using concepts learned inour program. The offering of this course provided a culture of life-long innovation in our college;it enhanced our engineering students’ entrepreneurship skills. With this new course, our studentswill establish a foundation for a small business incubator in the region. Page 26.1275.9References1. Bousaba, N. and Conrad, J., “Recent Graduates’ Perspectives on Innovation and Entrepreneurship and the Creation of New Entrepreneurship
Midwestern university for the past three years. WIC leaders believe that participantsgreatly benefit from improved communication in terms of behaviors and resulting skills arethe focus of this paper. Communication has been identified by business executives as one of the top skillsneeded by professionals in the current workplace1. Professionals with good oral and writtenskills, as well as presentation and listening proficiency are more likely to be hired and leadsuccessful careers. ABET’s accreditation criterion for student outcomes include the “abilityto communicate effectively” 2.The WIC Competition Once a week participants from all majors ranging from the college of arts andsciences to law school come to the engineering school where
, and to provide apreview of law school for students considering legal study. The course primarily covered the IPfields of trade secret protection, patents, and copyright. The course emphasized critical thinking,with the expectation that these skills would transfer to the students’ future learning and work,regardless of major or of career plans. In its current form (the course is being taught for a fourthtime in the spring of 2015), the course’s expected learning outcomes are • Knowledge and comprehension: Explain the purpose and scope of the U.S. Constitution patent and copyright clause, federal statutes on patent, copyright and trademark, and judicial decisions on intellectual property; explain the key concepts of non
by peers and superiors, • anxiety regarding external motivators of grades, pay and future career opportunities, • anxiety regarding criticism of one’s mastery, • acceptance or rejection of critical comments that may improve the project results and team success. The net result of the interacting emotions may be anything from a meltdown of the engineer’s confidence (and concomitant drop in innovation-related competencies) to a team experience that improves the product, learns about the product/customer domain and builds team esprit de corps (and builds innovation-related competencies of individuals). These outcomes depend on many things including the dynamics of the design review and tone and content of
paper has focused on the pedagogical implications of us-ing the PAC to teach engineers to think like intrepreneurs. The short-term value of teaching withthe PAC is to highlight how decisions are made in the complex and rapidly changing environmentwithin a company. The long-term value is to develop habits of mind and action that will enablethem to make impactful contributions throughout their careers.8 AcknowledgementsThe author would like to thank the members of the Bucknell Biomedical Engineering Department,The Small Business Development Center at Bucknell University, Chris Sullivan, Charles Kim andSteve Shooter for their helpful conversations and comments.References [1] Henry Petroski, Henry Petroski, and Henry Petroski. To engineer is
in physical science.Dr. Senay Purzer, Purdue University, West Lafayette enay Purzer is an Assistant Professor in the School of Engineering Education. She is the recipient of a 2012 NSF CAREER award, which examines how engineering students approach innovation. She serves on the editorial boards of Science Education and the Journal of Pre-College Engineering Educa- tion (JPEER). She received a B.S.E with distinction in Engineering in 2009 and a B.S. degree in Physics Education in 1999. Her M.A. and Ph.D. degrees are in Science Education from Arizona State University earned in 2002 and 2008, respectively
on Creativity and Innovation in theEngineering Design Process. 1. The trip to [the external training organization]! But not just because of how much fun it was, but because of what we learned and what privileges we were provided. 2. The exercises we did to promote better creativity. 3. The entire course and especially the trip was more than just seeing behind the scenes at [the external training organization]. 4. I feel so confident in my abilities to be creative and successful in my engineering career. 5. Learning about the inner workings of [the external training organization] and how to apply it to life everywhere. 6. I honestly didn’t believe creativity could be taught or worked on…. I have been
early ideas through appropriate physical 4 and digital prototypes. X 5 An ability to apply discipline skills in highly interdisciplinary projects. X An ability to develop ideas and identify and communicate value 6 creation. X X 7 A respect for diverse viewpoints. X A recognition of the need for, and an ability to engage in, learning and 8 teaching complex concepts throughout ones career
withthe needs, experience levels, and career intentions of their students.The proposed framework attempts to address and create a bridge between two major debatesconcerning entrepreneurship education for engineers. It seeks to demonstrate and describe four majortypes of entrepreneurial learning based on the degree to which venture creation is an expectedoutcome of the learning, and the level of uncertainty in the value proposition of the opportunity.Given that entrepreneurship takes on vastly different forms depending on these two dimensions, it islittle wonder that researchers and practitioners in the field confront difficulties in defining majorideas, identifying best practices, or measuring and comparing programs’ success.Rationale for the
usually full to capacity within one (1) day of Page 26.295.13 announcement; As a member of the first cohort of the NSF funded Pathways to Innovation program, ledby the Epicenter at Stanford University and VentureWell, New Mexico State has been effectivein leveraging external academic and industry partners from across the country to advanceprogram offerings within the facility and work towards a plan for long-term sustainability.Further, the development of public-private partnerships ensure relevance across the curriculumtowards student career readiness. During the upcoming year, the leadership team will be focusing on
deductive teaching technique of proposing a concept, explaining the principles anddemonstrating mathematical models of the concept (Froyd et al., 2012). This required the studentto memorize the material or work examples which was followed by testing their performance onsimilar work during an exam (Prince and Felder, 2006). However, traditional engineeringcurriculum and coursework lacks important student learning opportunities, such as; the reason whythese concepts or mathematics are important, what is their real-world relevance and how this willimpact the students’ future career in engineering. An alternative to the traditional teaching methodis inductive learning, which is a student-centered approach that encompasses many pedagogicalmethods
Assistant Professor in the School of Engineering Education. She is the recipient of a 2012 NSF CAREER award, which examines how engineering students approach innovation. She serves on the editorial boards of Science Education and the Journal of Pre-College Engineering Educa- tion (JPEER). She received a B.S.E with distinction in Engineering in 2009 and a B.S. degree in Physics Page 26.1650.1 Education in 1999. Her M.A. and Ph.D. degrees are in Science Education from Arizona State University earned in 2002 and 2008, respectively.Ms. Jessica Dolores Menold, Pennsylvania State University, University Park