opportunities of the futurerequires that they learn to engage in analytical thinking, argumentation, and collaborativeteamwork and that they see such practices as central to design processes. Engaging middleschool learners in collaborative engineering design projects can provide them with opportunitiesto develop communicative competencies related to speaking like an engineer by participating intalk about designed products, design processes, and metacommunicative talk about designcommunication itself.9-11The K-12 engineering education community also recognizes collaborative interaction as a keyengineering practice. The National Research Council identified communication as a vitalengineering “habit of mind.”12 Additionally, the Next Generation Science
currently lives in Redmond, WA,where he works as a Service Engineer for Microsoft.Dr. Dale C Rowe, Brigham Young University Dr. Rowe has worked for nearly two decades in security and network architecture with a variety of industries in international companies. He has provided secure enterprise architecture on both military and commercial satellite communications systems. He has also advised and trained both national and international governments on cyber-security. Since joining Brigham Young University in 2010, he has designed a variety of courses on information assurance, cybersecurity, penetration testing, cyber forensics, malware analysis and systems administration and published over a dozen papers in cybersecurity.Samuel
University at Qatar has been recognized as one of the leading institutions offering engineering degrees in the region. The campus has attracted over 85 full-‐time faculty members representing some of the best minds in engineering education and scholarship. STEM Education The State of Qatar has long acknowledged the intrinsic value of science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) for empowering upcoming Qatari talent and to transform this fast-‐growing country into a world-‐class research and discovery icon in the region. Further, Qatar’s efforts to nationalize its energy workforce and reduce dependence on foreign workers creates an
Paper ID #13537Introduction to STEAM through Music Technology (Evaluation)Mr. Jeff Gregorio, Drexel University Jeff Gregorio is currently pursuing a PhD in Electrical and Computer Engineering at Drexel University. He received his BSEE from Temple University in 2011, and MSEE from Drexel in 2013. In 2012, he received the NSF-funded GK-12 Fellowship, for which he designed activities for Philadelphia high school students illustrating the connection between the arts and the sciences, to catalyze interest in STEM/STEAM. Jeff currently studies under Dr. Youngmoo Kim in Drexel’s Music Entertainment Technology lab, pursuing
demonstrated a small, but not yet significant, increase in interest aftercamp compared to camp surveys without social integration. When comparing theBioengineering track to other GAMES tracks, BIOE campers reported an 8% increase in interestin engineering and confidence in engineering careers. Students also provided open-endedresponses to the survey and comments were positive about the experience (Figure 4). “I was really surprised how the environment has influence over us” “I really liked how [we] talked about some ‘taboo’ topics for our age like race and gender roles” “Small groups really helped with difficult conversations” “It was neat to see how our mind, body, and social network
Paper ID #13303Leveraging the ASEE Annual Conference Robot Competition to IncreaseECE Recruiting and RetentionDr. Chad Eric Davis, University of Oklahoma Chad E. Davis received the B.S. degree in mechanical engineering, M.S. degree in electrical engineering, and Ph.D. degree in engineering from the University of Oklahoma (OU), Norman, in 1994, 2000, and 2007, respectively. Since 2008, he has been a member of the Electrical and Computer Engineering (ECE) faculty, University of Oklahoma. Prior to joining the OU-ECE faculty, he worked in industry at Uponor (Tulsa, OK), McElroy Manufacturing (Tulsa, OK), Lucent (Oklahoma City
communities in under- graduate physics departments, and an elected member of the Physics Education Research Leadership and Organizing Council (PERLOC).Dr. Ayush Gupta, University of Maryland, College Park Ayush Gupta is Research Assistant Professor in Physics and Keystone Instructor in the A. J. Clark School of Engineering at the University of Maryland. Broadly speaking he is interested in modeling learning and reasoning processes. In particular, he is attracted to fine-grained analysis of video data both from a micro- genetic learning analysis methodology (drawing on knowledge in pieces) as well as interaction analysis methodology. He has been working on how learners’ emotions are coupled with their conceptual and
Paper ID #13484”It’s Too Hard,” to ”I Get It!” – Engaging Developmental Science as a Tool toTransform First Year Engineering EducationProf. Carmela Cristina Amato-Wierda, University of New Hampshire Carmela Amato-Wierda is Associate Professor of Materials Science at the University of New Hampshire. She shifted her research focus several years ago to the area of cognitive development of STEM concepts and practices in grades K-16. She has held NSF funded curriculum projects in General Chemistry and Materials Science, and has recently developed two science courses for non-scientists, titled: The Science of Stuff and
communication of learninggoals5 – the knowledge they are expected to know, the skills they are expected to do, and thehabits they are expected to possess.6 In engineering, learning goals can be categorized into fourbroad areas: factual knowledge, conceptual understanding, skills (communication andprocedural), and habits-of-mind.7To foster engagement, schools are turning to active learning methods that stress dynamic studentinvolvement in classroom lessons and activities. Research supportive of active learning points toincreased levels of higher-order thinking, long-term information retention, and intrinsicmotivation.8,9 Strengths of the interactive model are attributed to the hands-on application ofnewly-attained information, more likely to be
Paper ID #11750Facilitating the Transition of a Traditional Engineering Course to a Struc-tured, Active, In-Class Learning Environment as a Teaching AssistantSarah Ilkhanipour Rooney, University of Pennsylvania Sarah I. Rooney is a Ph.D. candidate in the Bioengineering department at the University of Pennsylvania. She received her B.S.E. (2009) and M.S.E. (2010) in Biomedical Engineering from the University of Michigan (Ann Arbor).Dr. Julie Schafer McGurk, University of Pennsylvania Julie McGurk is an Associate Director for the Center for Teaching and Learning at the University of Pennsylvania. She earned her B.S. in
encountered by students as they move through these institutionalized trajectories. He is co-editor of a 2010 National Society for the Study of Education Yearbook, Learning Research as a Human Science. Other work has appeared in Linguistics and Education; Mind, Culture, and Activity; Anthropology & Education Quarterly, the Encyclopedia of Cognitive Science; the Journal of Engineering Education; and the Cambridge Handbook of Engineering Education Research. His teaching interests include develop- mental psychology; sociocultural theories of communication, learning, and identity; qualitative methods; and discourse analysis.Frederick A. Peck, University of Colorado Frederick Peck is a PhD Candidate in the School of
Paper ID #11777Designing a Multimedia Learning Environment that Engages Children ThroughNarrativeDr. Glenn W Ellis, Smith College Glenn Ellis is a Professor of Engineering at Smith College who teaches courses in engineering science and methods for teaching science and engineering. He received a B.S. in Civil Engineering from Lehigh University and an M.A. and Ph.D. in Civil Engineering and Operations Research from Princeton Univer- sity. The winner of numerous teaching and research awards, Dr. Ellis received the 2007 U.S. Professor of the Year Award for Baccalaureate Colleges from the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement
and a middle school mathematics teacher at a Title 1 school in Waco, TX.Dr. Johannes Strobel, Texas A&M University Dr. Johannes Strobel is Director, Educational Outreach Programs and Associate Professor, Engineering & Education at Texas A&M, College Station. He received his M.Ed. and Ph.D. in Information Science & Learning Technologies from the University of Missouri. His research/teaching focuses on engineering as an innovation in pK-12 education, policy of STEM education, how to support teachers and students’ academic achievements through engineering, engineering ’habits of mind’ and empathy and care in engi- neering. He has published more than 140 journal articles and proceedings papers in
Paper ID #12073Towards a T Shaped Electrical and Computer Engineering Curriculum: aVertical and Horizontally Integrated Laboratory/Lecture ApproachDr. Harry Courtney Powell, University of Virginia Harry Powell is an Associate Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering in the Charles L. Brown Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at the University of Virginia. After receiving a Bach- elor’s Degree in Electrical Engineering in1978 he was an active research and design engineer, focusing on automation, embedded systems, remote control, and electronic/mechanical co-design techniques, holding 16 patents in these
faculty. With the largerinformal learning institutions, the process involved more administrative processes and tooklonger to identify project ideas for the students. Smaller CBOs had a clear need for technical helpwith an engineering challenge making it easier to start the project once a team was identified.For civic-minded faculty, there was appreciation of the prescreening work in identifyingorganizations, projects, and resources to help them engage in projects of interest. Facultyinterested in community-based research were more successful at working with partners andidentifying appropriate student projects than those focused on laboratory research. Spin-offresearch projects are ongoing with community partners regardless of if they became
Paper ID #12482Using the Engineering Grand Challenges to Foster Critical Thinking andAwareness of the Engineer’s Role in the Global CommunityDr. Angela Thompson P.E., University of Louisville Dr. Angela Thompson is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Engineering Fundamentals at the University of Louisville. Dr. Thompson received her PhD in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Louisville. Her research interests are in biomechanics and engineering education, particularly related to critical thinking instruction.Dr. Patricia A Ralston, University of Louisville Dr. Patricia A. S. Ralston is Professor and
invitingfaculty from various types of institutions, from teaching intensive universities to communitycolleges, to present at the program, we hope to address this problem and ultimately strengthenthe program. Overall, iFEAT has proven to be a great resource for female engineering candidatespreparing for the academic job search and poses a potential framework for institutions to addressthe gender gap in academia.References1. Shen, H. Inequality quantified: Mind the gender gap. Nature, 2013.2. National Science Foundation, National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics. 2013. Women, Minorities,and Persons with Disabilities in Science and Engineering: 2013. Special Report NSF 13-304. Arlington, VA.Available at http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/wmpd/.3
Paper ID #12362Broadening Participation in Engineering: Making in the K-12 Classroom Fol-lowing an Interest-Based Framework (RTP, Strand 4)Miss Avneet Hira, Purdue University, West Lafayette Avneet is a doctoral student in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. Her research interests include K-12 education and first year engineering in the light of the engineering design process, and inclusion of digital fabrication labs into classrooms. Her current work at the FACE lab is on the use of classroom makerspaces for an interest-based framework of engineering design. She holds a B.E. in Aeronautical
school. Preliminary survey results indicate that the majority of teachers had amediocre level of interest and willingness to receive additional training. This study will presentthe final results of a school-wide survey as well as identify challenges, and benefits for furtherteacher engagement and buy-in towards the achievement of STEM certification for this schoolwhich will be applicable and beneficial to other elementary schools with similar demographics.RTP Strand 3 – Principles of K-12 Engineering Education and Practice ● Papers in this strand contain research focusing on developing engineering habits of mind in teachers and students. These engineering habits of mind include learning from failure, teamwork and collaboration, and
Paper ID #13961What is global preparedness? Arriving at answers in collaboration with stu-dent engineers working with underserved communities globallyDr. Bhavna Hariharan, Stanford University Bhavna Hariharan is a Social Science Research Associate at the Kozmetsky Global Collaboratory in the School of Humanities and Sciences at Stanford University. Her field of inquiry is Engineering Education Research (EER) with a focus on engineering design for and with underserved communities around the world. For the last nine years, she has worked on designing, implementing and managing environments for interdisciplinary
first-semester GPA, while logisticregression was used for first-year engineering retention because it is a binary outcome.43Consistent with standard practice,43 the logistic regression results are reported using odds ratios.Readers unfamiliar with logistic regression should keep in mind that odds are not the same asprobabilities. For example, if 60% of a cohort of students is retained in engineering (as wastypical both nationally and at the study university from 2011-2012), the probability of aparticular student being retained is 0.6 while the odds of his or her being retained are 60:40 or1.5:1. If, on the other hand, 82% of a group of students is retained (as was the case for the 2013Engineering LLCs at the study university), the probability
, like I said, I've had experience doing just about all of it so I feel comfortable saying that I can, at least from the classes I've taken and the work, that I can probably do, I won't say any of it, but to have at least some knowledge for everything.In this quote Jake describes his transition from not having much confidence and beingnervous about whether he was qualified to do the job to being confident and comfortablethat he can do whatever engineering job he puts his mind to. His professional identitybegins to develop as he tells stories from his co-op experience. Towards the end of hisco-op experience he became the only person that was familiar with some of theprocesses. He began teaching the full-time replacement because
Paper ID #11491Project-based learning in a high school pre-engineering program: Findingson student behavior (RTP, Strand 3)Todd France, University of Colorado, Boulder Todd France is a Ph.D. candidate at the University of Colorado Boulder. He is part of the Graduate STEM Fellows in K-12 Education Program and helps teach and develop curriculum at a high school STEM academy. His research focuses on pre-engineering education and project-based learning. Page 26.1266.1 c American Society for
Paper ID #12268The Impact of a Neuro-Engineering Research Experience for Undergradu-ates Site on Students’ Attitudes toward and Pursuit of Graduate StudiesDr. John D. Carpinelli, New Jersey Institute of Technology Dr. John D. Carpinelli is a Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering at the New Jersey Institute of Technology. He has served as coordinator of activities at NJIT for the Gateway Engineering Education Coalition and as a member of the Coalition’s Governing Board. He previously chaired NJIT’s Excellence in Teaching Awards Committee and is Past Chair of the University Master Teacher Committee.Linda Hirsch, New
that failure – orperhaps the normalcy of failure – be promoted as an engineering habit of mind for students topractice within P12 engineering education. Engineering habits of mind are engineers’ ways ofthinking and doing,31 and include “systems thinking … creativity … [and] optimism.32,i Includingthe normalcy of failure – and thus, productive and resilient responses to failure – as anotherengineering habit of mind seems appropriate given that engineers’ ways of thinking andbehaving include ways of thinking and acting about failure. As argued earlier, however, failurein the context of P12 education has not been well studied. This exploratory study begins toaddress this gap, providing insight into student responses to failure and, in turn
engineering projects. Table 7 below showsthe number and percent that selected “Yes,” with the highest percentage for each itemhighlighted in green: Table 7: Changes in Interest in Science and Engineering, Post-project Formal Informal (n=429) (n=347) This project changed my mind about how interesting science is. 45% 58% This project made me want to take more classes in science if they are available. 30% 54% This project changed my mind about how interesting engineering is
Paper ID #13336A reflection on the process of selecting, developing, and launching a new de-sign project in a large-scale introduction to engineering design courseMr. Kevin Calabro, University of Maryland, College Park Kevin Calabro is Keystone Instructor and Associate Director in the Clark School of Engineering at the University of Maryland.Dr. Ayush Gupta, University of Maryland, College Park Ayush Gupta is Research Assistant Professor in Physics and Keystone Instructor in the A. J. Clark School of Engineering at the University of Maryland. Broadly speaking he is interested in modeling learning and reasoning processes
Paper ID #11853Using an Instrument Blueprint to Support the Rigorous Development of NewSurveys and Assessments in Engineering EducationMs. Jessica Menold Menold, Pennsylvania State University, University Park Jessica Menold is a second year graduate student interested in entrepreneurship, the design process, and innovativeness of engineering graduates and professionals. She is currently working as a student mentor in the Lion Launch Pad program, where she works to support student entrepreneurs. Jessica is currently conducting her graduate research with Dr. Kathryn Jablokow on a project devoted to the development of a
engaging students but increasing their learning experiences. Though it isrecommended learning environments should be designed to actively engage students, professorsshould also be mindful of how these activities are perceived by the students. The purpose of this paper is to investigate the types of activities used to teach electriccircuits and students’ reported perceptions of these activities. This systematic literature review isaimed at answering the following questions: “How are engineering learning environmentsdesigned to promote students’ understanding of electric circuits? What are students’ perceptionsof the types of activities used in enhancing their understanding of circuit concepts?” Systematicliterature reviews as opposed to the
working at the pickle plant—to help support the family and her husband’s wages from working for the railroad and a grocerystore. Even though neither of her parents graduated from college, it was never a doubt in her orher brother’s mind that they would since her parents had insisted as such since they were verysmall.For Julie, the appeal of engineering was that it would provide a good job and an opportunity tohelp other people. Both she and her brother ended up at Mines after an engineer at her father’sworkplace told them that it was the best engineering school. After graduating with a degree inmechanical engineering, she had multiple interviews in varying industries but took a job at anengineering firm that was expanding the public lightrail