, but then found out the wood used wouldnot support the bobby pins and simplified the plan by using just a piece of plywood. Please seeFigure 3 for examples of instruments designed and created by student groups. Figure 3. Examples of Student Designed Instruments Via the Audacity program, students tested their instruments to see if they were in tune. Iwould have the program up and running when the students came into class. After playing theinstrument and importing it into Audacity, students would take the cursor and highlight aselection from the song, and zoom in until they can see the wave form. Often, they would haveto magnify to thousandths of a second to measure the length of one cycle of the wavelength. Todetermine if
faculty members in front of students added to students’ sense that theenvironment was chaotic rather than well planned. The transition to student autonomy may haveoccurred too rapidly for these students.Most students seemed to better understand why the PI learning experience was designed as itwas by mid-semester, suggesting that some of the initial faculty concerns about studentconfusion may have been exaggerated. The time and pace required for this transition will be anobvious area of research moving forward.Nevertheless, it became clear that a full four year curriculum design was needed to help studentsconceptualize how they would move through the program and how their current work would tieto long-term academic and professional goals
videoclips, simulations, and PowerPoint presentations.Future Work and Concluding RemarksWe plan to fully complete this project including the identification of resources andimplementation of the website by fall 2015. We not only would like our own students to use thewebsite extensively, but also sincerely hope that other interested students from all over the worldwould do the same. To this end, invitation letters and emails will be sent to as many nuclearengineering programs as possible to introduce our website to a wider audience after thecompletion of the project. In addition, the letters would invite members of the American NuclearSociety (ANS) student chapter to participate in the website review and provide feedback aboutselected resources. This
communication barriers.The analysis of the subgroup Ambivert types has been combined with the analysis of the currentcommunication modes to present a recommended intra-team communication structure. Thisstructure describes modes of communication that may generally be expected to be successful. Itshould be noted, however, that individuals within the sub-teams may have differentcommunication types and that this plan may, and probably will, have to be adjusted by theproject manager based on the personnel actually involved.Figure 5 shows the proposed communication flow chart for the team. The Engineering Managernow communicates with all of the engineering teams on a two-way base communication system.All of the engineering teams are also on a two-way base
. Page 26.1091.3The Role of Building RelationshipsIn order to undertake challenging design and build projects with industry sponsors, a substantiallevel of trust must be established between the university and the sponsors. Such projects requirean understanding of the capabilities of the student teams on the part of the corporate sponsors, aswell as an understanding of the culture and expectations of their corporate partners by thestudents and faculty. This level of trust requires long term planning, development, and nurturing.The engineering programs as Grand Valley State University were launched at the request of localindustry in the 1980’s. The programs were designed by a team of faculty in collaboration withpracticing engineers from industry
integration. Theactivity provides an excellent opportunity for students to integrate their knowledge of automationbuilding blocks (such as sensor, actuator, relays, switches, push buttons, PLC and interfacing) inreal-life problem solving. The experience is challenging, but seems positive and has been well-received by students (some have even brought their parents to see their projects). Future plansinclude combining multiple models to form a large scale system, creating an on-linedocumentation system so that teams can blog about their learning experience throughout theproject development stage, and making the systems available to be controlled remotely via theweb. We also plan to conduct experiments using mobile devices for remote control of systems
accurate interpretations of the items by engineering students, (2)accurate alignment of what the instrument is measuring as evaluated by content experts, and (3)support of the instrument and planned intended use of the instrument by education researchersand practitioners. The initial steps for validating the SCAEI presented here, steps which areoften overlooked or ignored by instrument developers [12], have provided valuable informationfor the development of the SCAEI.These results also indicated social and behavioral context that engineering instructors shouldconsider when planning classroom activities. Specifically, the engineering students perceived“arguing” or “defending” ideas as something that is disrespectful to the instructor. If
workThis paper demonstrates that it is possible for a public PUI to develop and deliver a successfulMOOC for relatively low cost using local resources. For this plan to be replicated at other publicPUIs, the instructor(s) must be willing to be only partially compensated for their time; theSummer 2012 workshop stipend and six units of release time received by the lead authorrepresents a fraction of the total time put into the creation of the hybrid course and MOOC. AMOOC developed using the model discussed in this paper would have to be a “labor of love.”While this may turn off many faculty members from creating their own MOOC, the lead authorexperienced a tremendous amount of personal satisfaction from helping hundreds of peoplearound the world
concept. Materials on ‘soft skills’ such as communication, teaming, and project planning may be more universally transferrable. The application of the engineering design process is sufficiently unique for each course to potentially require individualized university-specific introduction videos. In-class exercises need more context and definition. Quizzes need to address higher levels on Bloom’s Taxonomy rather than just recall, understanding, and comprehension. There is currently no consensus on best practices to achieve high compliance of participation for out-of-class activities (watching videos, completing quizzes).Through collaboration with other engineering faculty at the FYEE conference
published, and they are used by over 6500 facultyat over 1200 institutions in 62 countries. The peer-evaluation instrument can be previewed atwww.CATME.org. Although the tools were developed to help instructors manage teams,4,5 theycan also facilitate research on students’ learning and document student outcomes related tolearning and the quality of their team experiences.6 We propose seven empirical studies tomeasure the effect sizes of the following learning experiences: teamwork training, working inteams, rating teamwork, and giving and receiving feedback.Research OverviewThe research plan illustrated by Figure 1 shows our outcomes (in rectangles), the strategies bywhich we expect to achieve them (in ovals), and the studies by which we will
data were shared with fellow researchers and colleagues as a meansto ensure trustworthiness.ResultsOf the 42 posdocs in this study, 69% were in their first postdoc position, 29% were in theirsecond, and 2% were in their third. Of these 42, 48% were interested in academic positions aftertheir current position, while 29% were interested in industry. The remaining postdocs eitherwere uncertain of their plans or had plans unrelated to industry or academia. The followingsections summarize the reasons these postdocs decided to pursue postdoc positions, and theresponsibilities, benefits, and challenges that came with the position. The participants’ genderand field are represented by M (male), F (female), SCI (science), and ENG (engineering).Reasons
expected to be a guy in engineering,” with a sense of exasperation at theprogram coordinator’s lack of acknowledgement of the hypocritically stacked playing field (i.e.women are powerful! but actually be a guy). She continues this deconstruction of the idea ofstereotypically feminine team roles further, pointing out the hypocrisy of blaming girls for doingwhat they are good at: If because you are a girl and just happen to be really good at organizing or planning or doing numbers or making nice spreadsheets, that should not be an indication that you are failing. 1st interview, (emphasis hers) If she's good at paperwork, paperwork! I mean again, no one wants to do it, yet why do people go to business school to
countries. The peer-evaluation instrument can be previewed atwww.CATME.org. Although the tools were developed to help instructors manage teams,4,5 theycan also facilitate research on students’ learning and document student outcomes related tolearning and the quality of their team experiences.6 We propose seven empirical studies tomeasure the effect sizes of the following learning experiences: teamwork training, working inteams, rating teamwork, and giving and receiving feedback.Research OverviewThe research plan illustrated by Figure 1 shows our outcomes (in rectangles), the strategies bywhich we expect to achieve them (in ovals), and the studies by which we will measure theconnections (arrows). The model is informed by prior research. To establish
engineering student project teams. Additionally, she has co-developed a framework for measuring and in- terpreting an array of team dynamics. An online assessment tool has been created based on this framework which allows teams to diagnose and improve the ”health” of their team. She is passionate about her area of research and plans to continue conducting research on factors that contribute to effective teamwork.Ms. Amanda Deacon, University of Calgary I am currently in my second year masters in Industrial Organizational Psychology at the University of Calgary under the supervision of Dr. Tom O’Neill. My area of focus is teams within organizational contexts and that results in a plethora of research conducted with engineering
tovariation in 1) delivery method, 2) collaboration, 3) feedback response, and 4) performanceconsequences. Ideally, a full factorial design of experiments would be conducted to obtain aproper analysis of the interaction effects of different combinations of learning resources. Thelogistics involved in planning, documenting, and executing the numerous combinations offactors in the same semester for our large cohort presents a logistical challenge. Future workplans to include the evaluation of new learning resources designed with the combination offactors that were not met in this study. The end goal is to determine an optimum combination oflearning resources to provide the ideal educational experience for the collective group ofstudents.MethodsFor this
corresponding allowable stresses.Separate lectures were presented on materials selection. The students were made aware of thefact that a designer had to choose the material best suited for the specific situation from a vastmenu of materials. The material selection decision could be effectively performed usingAshby’s book [3] and elements from the Cambridge Engineering Selector [4]. The software CESEduPack[4] was not used, but was planned to be used the next offering of the course. To establishthe rational way of material selection, the concept of the material indices as discussed in Ashby’s Page 26.265.4text [3] was briefly mentioned. These indices
, including the NSF grant principalinvestigator (PI) and co-PI. The aforementioned data shows that 65.6% of students fromtechnology programs took the survey. Even though demographics and baseline data left no doubtthat the communities served are disadvantaged, come from low-income families in WestVirginia, and require financial assistance, more insight is needed to determine a proposed, well-rounded plan to increase retention using the prospective grant.Data CollectionTo obtain objective information for the grant-writing process, fifteen survey questions werecreated. All survey questions were closed-ended, and were either multiple-choice or scaled.Students were surveyed during the same week by the instructors of pre-selected courses in orderto avoid
one-semester capstone class. These half-courses allow students to exploreembedded system interfacing or higher-level embedded concepts while planning andinvestigating ideas for their capstone project.Our objective in this presentation is to give other educators working with courses in EmbeddedComputing a description of our laboratory experiments that have been shown to provide studentswith a contextual basis for the relevance of the in-lab experience1. We will describe theseexperiments in a high level way and show how they build on earlier BYOE presentation materialfrom the University of Virginia. In showing how we structured these experimental courses, alongwith the actual experiments, we provide insight on how individual institutions may
Curriculum – Year 4Overview and ObjectivesWe report on the progress of the fourth year of a CCLI Type 2 project. The goal of this project isto create a community of learning within the discipline of chemical engineering (ChE) focusedon concept-based instruction. The project plan is to develop and promote the use of a cyber-enabled infrastructure for conceptual questions, the AIChE Concept Warehouse, whichultimately could be used throughout the core ChE curriculum (Material and Energy Balances,Thermodynamics, Transport Phenomena, Kinetics and Reactor Design, and Materials Science).Conceptual questions, both as Concept Inventories and ConcepTests, are available through aninteractive website maintained through the Education Division of the American
-stakes meeting may have reducedsocial loafing and contributed overall to students’ verbal participation.I. IntroductionIn the workplace and the academy, professional engineers, researchers, and students typicallyfunction in teams. Even if individual team members have diverse technical backgrounds andexpertise, the effectiveness of their work together depends on more than engineering ‘chops’. Inorder to negotiate, plan, motivate, and integrate tasks at the team and even department level,engineers must practice and become skilled at interpersonal tasks like “communication,collaboration, networking, feedback provision and reception, teamwork, lifelong learning, andcultural understanding”1. As a collective rather than individual endeavor, the
exam and the D-F-W rate dropped. Thebiggest continuing challenge is getting instructors that are supportive of active learning activitiesduring lecture.To prepare for lecture, students currently have a choice of watching a video or reading through aset of PowerPoint slides. For those students who prefer a hands-on approach to learning, analternative is being developed. It is an interactive MATLAB GUI with lessons on the topics Page 26.1698.11covered in the videos. The GUI is modeled on the interactive lessons offered by Codeacademy12for various programming languages. The plan is to make this GUI available to students inEngineering Models I
sequence of the raised floor platform of the Hall of Central Harmony (ca.24-m by 24-m): (I) Compact earth for floor base; (II) Erect floor-base perimeter and stairs/stepsfrom stone blocks: (III) Install column-base blocks inside this perimeter; (IV) Place strip masonryfoundations (grade beams) between column bases; (V) Place and compact soil in layers up to floorelevation level; and (VI) Place marble floor slabs. Page 26.1708.9 Fig. 6. Top view of temple floor plan of the Hall of Central Harmony (ca. 24-m by 24-m)III. Walls and Columns Walls and columns are central to the establishment of a Chinese temple. Despite thenumerous variations of the construction materials, in general
hour rule”. There was no significant difference in these findings whenlooking at subsets such as engineering only vs. non-engineering students or female vs. malestudents with a slight exception in regards to what seems to be a polarization of computer sciencestudents’ involvement. From the service-learning and student outcome questions we can clearly see that skills utilizedextend beyond just what we would consider normal classroom/course objectives. There are a largenumber of students who indicated that they used a professional skill such as time management,process planning, task delegation, construction, power tools, and/or developed a new skill and/orexpanded upon a current skill. Again, based on the findings, this was neither major
with better features.”“I have learned a great deal of things from the contest: technical, mathematical, and theexperience of the contest itself, the presentation of our work in front of such an exclusiveaudience”.“I learned a lot about complex system’s planning and verification”.Several students’ comments refer to the job offers or scholarships that they received afterparticipating in this competition and meeting industry representatives:“It helped me get a job in the embedded design”.“For me, the 4th edition of the Diligent Design Contest was a career-changer... literally... At theend of my 3rd year at TUCN, I was looking for a job... and I found it thanks to the DesignContest”.“The fact that I won a prestigious European contest contributed
5) A user evaluation plan a) Test for effectiveness b) Test for efficiency c) Test for satisfaction Data Collection Six groups of students consented to participate in this study. Students were required to post all 14deliverables on Interactive Learning and Collaboration Environment (InterLACE). For the purposes of this study, only two deliverables were examined: list of user needs and list of product specifications (including materials). Page 26.705.5
tocreate the NC-code required to create an artifact using computer numerically controlledmachining centers. This requires students to create the component in the FeatureCAM programas well as the associated process plan. The process plan requires the student to identify whichtools are necessary to machine the component. Two examples are shown in Figures 4 and 5.Overall lab grades for the CAM Course are reported as out of 100 possible points. a. b. Figure 5. CAM Course Laboratory Exercise Requiring the Generation of Complex Curves Showing the Expected Geometry (a.) and Necessary Lofted Surfaces (b.).This work assesses the following research questions with respect to the effects
combustion, and learned about the future needs of combustion development.The following were identified strengths of the program: Early exposure to combustion concepts helped students gain more from the laboratories and guest instruction. Teacher attendance and participation at the Combustion Institute meetings helped provide material for instructional instruments and laboratories. Students enjoyed using the high-tech equipment purchased with the grant money. Guest instruction by Dr. Belovich was an excellent capstone to the year’s emphasis on combustion.The following are lessons-learned: Some experiments planned will require more time to design and engineer for in-class use.Mr. McLinden intends to continue
Paper ID #11608Experience-Based Approach for Teaching and Learning Concepts in DigitalSignal ProcessingDr. Daniel Raviv, Florida Atlantic UniversityJuan D. Ramirez, Florida Atlantic University Juan Ramirez is pursuing his bachelor’s degree in electrical engineering at Florida Atlantic University and expects to graduate in December of 2014. Some of his research interests lie in the areas of power electronics, control systems, and engineering education. He has held leadership positions in organizations such as Tau Beta Pi, IEEE, and SHPE. Upon graduation he plans to start working with General Electric. His long-term goals
higher education. For a number of years within engineering education, engineeringaccreditation boards in the US, Canada, and internationally, have recognized lifelong learning asone of the key competencies of engineering graduates. Characteristics of the lifelong learnerinclude the ability to “set goals, apply appropriate knowledge and skills, engage in self-directionand self-evaluation, locate required information, and adapt their learning strategies to differentconditions” (p. 292-293)1, 2. Inherent in these skills of lifelong learning is the ability for one to bea self-regulated learner with the ability to plan, monitor, control, and adjust his or her behaviourto achieve a desired outcome. In a learning context, self-regulation is highly
FDM system and that may delay the prompt delivery to current masterdata to consumers [4]. Operational MDM (FDM) can deliver significant gains in the formof operational efficiencies and process consistencies, but companies recognize thepotential risk, costs and time to enterprise-breadth data to management of such a programand seek the executive sponsorship and funding required to make it a success [9].Godinez [4], Shankar [13], Shankar and Menon [14], and Loshin [10] focusedspecifically on the factors influence have on FDM and CDM. They discussed how thesefactors influence CDM or FDM selection and the influence of business and technologyon the master data management planning. For instance Shankar [13] explained thedifference between business