career and manage a project which requires developing anumber of soft skills, such as interpersonal, marketing, and communications 14. In order to be atrue engineering leader, engineering students must possess technical and nontechnical soft skills,which would give them an edge in the workplace 13. They must possess skills such as written andoral communication, customer relations, personal initiative, teamwork abilities, organizationalknowledge, and decision making that will facilitate the development of solutions to businesschallenges, to be effective leaders 15.According to the NAE (2004), “engineers must understand the principles of leadership and beable to practice them in growing proportions as their careers advance”. Engineers need
slate of programs to address diversifying goals on multiple frontsgreatly vary. Decisions about which K-12 activities to offer range from whether to host small tolarge size events, the design of an activity with respect to the appeal for younger, high school,minority and/or women students and whether to host it on campus or at a local school. Creatingand executing retention initiatives to support students once on campus may involve determiningthe amount of scholarship support necessary, teaching strategies to help students build anacademic community and maintaining pathways to involve more diverse students in research.An institution’s diversity slate may include individual projects resulting from faculty grants thatcreate a one-time outreach or
is the assessment chair and study abroad advisor for her department, the freshman director of the Civil Engineering Division for ASEE, and is the chair of the Continuing Education Committee for the Geo-Institute.Mrs. Kathleen Louise NazarPaul Bonfanti, Villanova University Paul Bonfanti is the Director of Planning and Policy Analysis for Villanova University. In that capacity, he performs quantitative and qualitative research and analysis for the University to inform policy and support strategic decision making. He also serves as an adjunct faculty member in the University’s Department of Public Administration, teaching Non Profit Management and Research and Analysis
? RQ1b: What are the professional and educational contexts in which participants experience mentorship?MethodParticipantsA total of 25 male undergraduate and graduate engineering students from a large, midwesternuniversity participated in the study. From an initial pool of personal contacts, researchers utilizedsnowball-sampling methods to create “chains of referral”.25 We attempted to diversify ourinterview pool to reflect the various disciplines of engineering by utilizing additional recruitmentmethods because sampling through “chains of referral” can lead to a bias toward selectinginterviewees who share homogenous attributes such as backgrounds or preferences,25 Thesemethods included posting recruitment flyers in campus buildings (See
education, deaf education, and online learning. She is a co-PI on RIT’s NSF ADVANCE IT project, Connect@RIT, and leads grant activities in the Human Resources strategic approach area.Prof. Sharon Patricia Mason, Rochester Institute of Technology Professor Sharon Mason is an Associate Professor in the Department of Information Sciences and Tech- nology at RIT where she has served on the faculty since 1997. Sharon has been involved in computing security education at RIT since its inception. She is the PI of for the Department of Defense (DoD) In- formation Assurance Scholarship Program (IASP) awards to RIT. These scholarships enable students to study and do research in graduate programs in security, forensics and information
Page 26.693.2information about courses and registration procedures, and ensuring that students enroll in thecorrect courses. Developmental advising encourages a two-way relationship with the advisor andstudent working together to help the student make his or her own decisions. Praxis is a hybrid ofprescriptive and developmental advising. Based on their study of millennials, the authorsrecommended dual advising where a professional advisor provides prescriptive advice and amentor, such as a faculty member, provides developmental support. According to Wiseman andMessitt, institutions using faculty advisors should provide specialized support.7 Faculty report (a)advising training helps them use their teaching skills in an advising setting and (b
the world, and has been applied in the City of Pittsburgh and counties in New Jersey. Previously, Dr. Klima worked at the Center for Clean Air Policy (CCAP), where she helped New York and Washington DC advance their adaptation planning. Dr. Klima completed her doctoral research in the Department of Engineering and Public Policy (EPP) at Carnegie Mellon University where she used physics, economics, and social sciences to conduct a decision analytic assessment of different methods to reduce hurricane damages. She has published several journal articles, won multiple speaking awards including the AGU Outstanding Student Paper Award, is an active member of 9 professional societies, and serves on the Natural Hazard
opportunities, and make informed decisions ontheir career choice, and to gradually build an education portfolio to best market themselves for it.Two programs are offered: 1) Corporate mentoring program, which is developed between theCEAS Emerging Ethnic Engineering (E3) Program and General Electric (GE) Aviation forethnic minority engineering students. Students are assigned mentors from GE who periodicallymonitor the students’ performances till graduation. 2) Paid industrial cooperative program (Co-Op). This program places students in co-op paid jobs by the UC’s Division of ProfessionalPractice (DPP) during the sophomore, pre-junior and junior years. Mentorship is provided byDPP faculty (one for each degree program) to guide them to appropriate paid co
industry where he held leadership positions focused on process improvement and organizational development. Page 26.1557.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 The Management Tree of Life - An Aid for Undergraduate Engineers to Structure Management ThinkingAbstractBoth members of industry and expert panels continue to call loudly for increasing the ability ofengineering undergraduates to effectively lead and work within diverse teams. Yet fewengineering programs have a formal approach to providing students with the knowledge ofmanagement, human motivation, and
Paper ID #12150Something to Write Home(work) About: An Analysis of Writing Exercises inFluid Mechanics TextbooksNatascha M Trellinger, Purdue University, West Lafayette Natascha Trellinger is a second year Ph.D. student in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. She received her B.S. in Aerospace Engineering from Syracuse University where her interest in the teaching and learning aspects of engineering began. At Purdue, Natascha is a member of the Global Engineering Education Collaboratory (GEEC) and is particularly interested in graduate level engineering education.Ms. Rebecca R Essig, Purdue University
increase students’ success, persistence and engagement wasintroduced into our department with an NSF funded project to adapt and augment the TekBoT®mobile robot platform developed at Oregon State University to the undergraduate curriculumfrom freshman through senior year in a vertically integrated manner. 1 By the end of this verticalarticulation project spanning 2005 – 2008, the TekBot was completely integrated into thefreshman year sequence, in one sophomore lab, and in one junior level experiment. 2 In thisproject, it was discovered that the TekBot was not well suited for the department’s upper levelclasses.2 As a result of this discovery, in 2008, a team of students and faculty came up with anew design for a brand new robot learning platform
study will identify influences in engineeringstudents’ lives that shape SR understanding. It will explore if there are differences in these ideasby gender. Specific research questions explored in this study are (i) how are student ideas aboutSR changing from their first to second years of college and (ii) what are major influences thatcause these changes?MethodsIn September 2013, first year civil (CE), environmental (EnvE), and mechanical (ME)engineering students from five institutions were invited to participate in an online survey of SR.At two institutions where students don’t declare a major until after the first year, the surveyinvitation was sent out to all engineering students. The Engineering Professional ResponsibilityAssessment (EPRA
,professional presentations and conferences, academic and career advising, applying for tenureand sabbaticals, and teaching techniques are common conversations during the faculty meetings.These informal conversations provide the faculty and graduate assistants with professionaldevelopment and peer mentoring outside of their department colleagues.When the program expanded in 2011 to include more majors, we experienced greater diversity inthe student scholars, but an unintended tradeoff has been fewer opportunities for peer-mentoringamongst the students within academic majors. To compensate for this change, the weeklyseminars regularly break up for discussion into groups clustered by major or academic year, aswell as by affinity relationships based on
literature search.Literature SearchPrevious papers 4, 5 explored broad areas of best practices in teaching characteristics and distanceeducation effectiveness. To build on this past work and more fully address the focus of thispaper, literature in the area of student perception and learning was explored. There is asignificant body of literature involving the combined areas of teaching method effectiveness,how that relates to intelligence beliefs (e.g. survey responses) and actual learning. The following Page 26.378.2paragraphs provide an overview of this work.Several studies we found had particular application to our work and addressed the
Community Service (EPICS) and MichiganTech’s D80 program exemplify how both students and institutions highly value such activities.Research into the effects of activities such as these has shown that students gain a greaterunderstanding of their civic and social responsibility, awareness of the world, and increasedacademic, personal and professional advancement. There remains, however, significantuncertainty about what happens when these students leave school and enter the engineeringprofession, and to what degree they are able and willing to continue participating in engineeringservice.Engineering service opportunities and value in the workplace were explored through interviewswith twelve engineering company employees. The employees were engaged
and technical programs to increase awareness of well-paying, available jobsrequiring vocational and technical training.3 Research indicates that, in order for the UnitedStates to retain its preeminence in science and technology, a million more STEM professionalswill be needed over the next decade.Key to reaching this goal is an increase in the retention of current STEM students. This can beaccomplished by training STEM faculty in an evidenced-based teaching method that keeps thestudents actively engaged in the STEM field.4 In addition, the results of a study that evaluated anumber of engineering curriculum projects, from small to large, determined that when done well,engineering projects are meaningful to a student’s personal experience. It
afford, which is nice. A lot was just making it up, trying it out, and seeing what worked and what did not work.” (Hayley)Richard and Hayley’s ability to engage led them to learn new ideas and perspectives on how todesign.Invested & CommittedOur framework also highlights invested and committed student designers. In the context of ourframework, this category captures personal commitment to social justice and the sustainability ofthe design and processes. At the novice sophistication level, a student approaches design as asingular task without intention to apply what has been learned to a new situation. An awarestudent has a developing sense of social responsibility and ethics. They begin to explore theimpact of the design in the social
Leadership Coach and attended by the Director of Studentswho provides the student leaders with insight and context regarding the academic program and theoperating decisions of the school. The Leadership Coach creates the opportunity to look at leadershiproles and responsibilities in a different way. In addition, the Leadership Coach initiates dialog betweenthe students to ensure they recognize the opportunity to learn from one another on an on-going basis. Oneof the meetings is used to provide each of the participants with a Myers Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI®)assessment with the intention of providing the students with: o a better understanding of their personal personality preferences, o an awareness of differences in personality types
. Unfortunately,limited work exists on this group, but what does exist31 begins to highlight the complexchallenges African-American women face as they negotiate identities as engineering studentsand professionals.MentoringTo respond to the calls and tap into the talent of African-American women, African-Americanwomen must successfully persist in an engineering degree program and into graduate programs.While no single solution will address this need, research suggests that mentors are one verysignificant component. Work by Lichtenstein et al., notes that “positive interactions withengineering faculty role models can have a significant influence on students’ decisions to pursuegraduate study in engineering”1, and these interactions may be even more
affecting the recruitment, retention, and career development of underrepresented students in engineering. Dr. Martin is a 2009 NSF CAREER awardee for her research entitled, ”Influence of Social Capital on Under-Represented Engineering Students Academic and Career Decisions.” She held an American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) Science and Technology Policy Fellowship in 2013-2014, with a placement at the National Science Foundation.Dr. George T. MacDonald, University of South Florida Dr. George MacDonald is the interim Director for the Center for Research, Evaluation, Assessment, and Measurement (CREAM) in the College of Education at the University of South Florida(USF). He is the Co-Principal
-curricularor both. Entrepreneurial Site and Data Collection Data was collected from an entrepreneurship program anchored in a large, Midwest,public research university college of engineering center for entrepreneurship (CFE). The CFEwas developed in response to student, alumni, faculty and administrative demands to address theneeds of educating engineering students for the changing economy. Both curricular and co-curricular experiences were supported by the CFE (Table 2) at different levels (i.e., staff,training, funding, mentorship, etc.). Curricular experiences included individual entrepreneurshipclasses and a formal 9-credit certificate program, designated the Program in Entrepreneurship.The formal Program in Entrepreneurship required
project designed toincrease the participation of people with disabilities in education and careers in engineering andimprove engineering fields with their perspectives and expertise. We are working withengineering faculty nationwide to (1) better serve a diverse student body that includes studentswith disabilities in engineering courses and programs, and (2) integrate relevant disability-relatedand universal design content into engineering courses.Starting in 2015, we will host a workshop each year with engineering faculty from across thecountry to discuss their approaches to achieving these goals. We will be drafting resources basedon these conversations and disseminating them widely through our networks of engineeringfaculty members, the
26.311.10 person shares in already have and rest of the Sharing with elders to technical content.Introduce common with their what they will group. Soft skills build confidence.LabVIEW, group members. learn by will be emphasizedgroup completing the and “support” careersstructure program. for non-engineers.and STEM Strengths and weaknesses.Week Two: • Life Skills: Week two explores the process of goal setting, providing activities where students are held accountable for building a business that benefits their
value insystematically creating one’s portfolio of leadership experiences and self-tracking their owndevelopment. The detailed comparison of one’s leadership attributes in comparison with theirpeers is also valuable in leading discussions with faculty members or mentors, which could alsohelp to normalize any discouragement a student’s who compares poorly to her/ his peers mightfeel after taking the survey. The methodology described in this paper extends the utility of the survey instrumentcreated by Ahn et al.1, which has thus far been used in gaining insights into the general trends ofthe experiences and observables outcomes of undergraduate engineering students, by providingthem with a personalized assessment of their skillset and
using a concise form. The authors and aprogram director of the granting agency review the proposals received to select a developer foreach module. The developers are required to undergo formal training on how to design andconstruct online learning modules that are highly interactive and of high quality. The Office ofeLearning at UNH provides the necessary training through a 3-week online course to both UNHfaculty and to faculty at other institutions. The modules are designed for course instructors todeploy in an asynchronous mode. Exercises and assessment of student learning are included ineach online module. The online modules will be integrated into the courses identified in Table 1and students will be required to complete them as part of
topInformation school that has been dedicated to training new librarians since 1928. The authorswill present their experience working with student librarians at the engineering library, which onseveral occasions has led to graduate student workers who return for full-time professionalpositions – a testament to the mutual benefits of the relationship.The authors will also discuss the ongoing mentoring of the newest engineering librarians on theirteam. These efforts include invitations to meetings with engineering faculty to facilitatenetworking, involvement in a variety of decision making processes, and careful training for ahost of new responsibilities. The team’s more experienced librarians impart their expertise andact as coach and counsellor
B.S. degree and beyond for several participants, and strongoutcomes for degree attainment. These, in addition to providing students with a sense ofbelonging, community, and a network of faculty members who become a touchstone or constantfor the students, make this bridge experience notable in a student’s academic career. Page 26.1576.14Degree Completion and Graduate School Enrollment: The development of strong educationalgoals leads directly to positive outcomes for degree completion. More than 120 students haveparticipated in the SCCORE program through 2013. At the conclusion of the Fall 2013 semester,69.1% of the participants had transferred
interviews taking place in the years following.For example, it was found that of the original 20 graduate students interviewed, only five weremaster’s degree candidates, which is not representative of the larger population in whichmaster’s students make up over 60% of the engineering and textiles graduate students. Toaddress this, five more master’s students were interviewed in the spring of 2012. An additionalthree PhD students offered to speak to us at that time, so they were interviewed as well. Deeperanalysis of the faculty interviews revealed early-career faculty as users that the library might beable to better support, and so additional interviews of faculty in this category were conducted inthe spring of 2013 to acquire more data from this
past several decades, there has been an increasing emphasis on the importance of engineerspossessing important professional skills, including global readiness or awareness. In 2004, theNational Academy of Engineering (NAE) described the Engineer of 2020 as being proficient in“interdisciplinary teams [with] globally diverse team members” (p. 55).1 As the NAE stated,“While certain basics of engineering will not change, the global economy and the way engineerswill work will reflect an ongoing evolution that began to gain momentum a decade ago.” (p. 4).Engineering graduates will be called to solve increasingly global problems and to work in teamsthat contain members who are either from international locations or are globally distributed.Across the
Paper ID #12161Electronic Notebooks to Document the Engineering Design Process: FromPlatform to ImpactDr. Rachel Louis Kajfez, Ohio State University Dr. Rachel Louis Kajfez is an Assistant Professor of Practice in the Engineering Education Innovation Center and the Department of Civil, Environmental, and Geodetic Engineering at The Ohio State Univer- sity. She earned her B.S. and M.S. degrees in Civil Engineering from Ohio State and earned her Ph.D. in Engineering Education from Virginia Tech. Her research interests focus on the intersection between motivation and identity of undergraduate and graduate students, first-year