questions and the response choices were the subject of well-designedresearch, and each question included one correct answer and several distractors based onstudents’ customary or common sense ideas (i.e., commonly held misconceptions)8,9. The samecontent was covered in all three sections. In addition, there were three exams during thesemester, with each instructor creating his/her own exam. Two exam questions that wereidentical across the flipped versus non-flipped sections were statistically compared fordifferences in student performance. The assessment analyst for the project conducted a semi-structured interview with the instructors after the course to discuss learning gains and studentpreferences with the flipped classroom.To further assess our
courses in thermodynamics, heat transfer, energy systems laboratory, cryogenics, and vacuum technology.Mr. David J Gagnon, University of Wisconsin - Madison David J. Gagnon (University of Wisconsin, Madison) is a Discovery Fellow and program director of the Mobile Learning Lab in the Wisconsin Institutes for Discovery at University of Wisconsin, Madison. He directs a team of educational researchers, software engineers, artists and storytellers that explore the inter- sections of learning science and media design, specializing in mobile media, video games and simulation. David is also the Director of the ARIS project, a free and open tool that allows anyone to produce mo- bile games, stories and tours. He is also active
native English speakers.2.2 Interview ProtocolsInterviews, which were part of a larger project on gender and interpersonal communication inengineering, were 75 minutes long and took place in a private room at the participants’ campus.For one week prior to the interview, participants were asked to keep a journal chronicling anytime they felt the need to complain or ask help. Interviews began by asking students somegeneral questions about their study and then asked them to elaborate on one or two incidents inthe journal. During the discussion, participants were explicitly asked who they went to whenthey needed help and whether or not they felt comfortable asking professors and peers for helpwith academic work. Participants were then shown some
pedagogical research and undergraduate research projects, and his research interests include manufacturing laboratory pedagogy and writing pedagogy.Dr. Wendy M. Olson, Washington State University Vancouver Dr. Wendy Olson is a tenured Associate Professor of English and specialist in rhetoric and composition. She serves as the Director of Composition and Writing Assessment at Washington State University Van- couver, where she teaches undergraduate courses in first-year composition and professional and technical writing, as well as graduate courses in writing studies theory and pedagogy. Page 26.924.1
University, Lehigh University,University of Texas–Tyler, University of Rhode Island, Michigan Technological University andUniversity of Pittsburgh also have developed curriculums that cultivate core global competencyskills through intensive coursework, projects and/or thesis work, and international study-abroadexperiences. The main issue with some of these programs, however, is the duration of theinternational experience and the amount of training that the student receives before embarkingabroad. In 2012, 341,284 U.S. students participated in some form of international study abroadprogram (4% engineering discipline), however less than 1% of the total served or studied abroadfor more than one academic year3. Comparative studies have demonstrated the
projects in the program. He is also keen in engaging students in his classrooms using a variety of methods while developing some. Page 26.934.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 In-class anonymous student feedback and interactivity at the speed of light!AbstractDespite their utility, traditional approaches to gauge student understanding and collecting theirresponses in class have multiple shortcomings. This paper discusses the shortfalls of thesetraditional methods (student raising hand, use of clickers, etc) and compares them with a newmethod
items can contain both semantically and contextuallyinappropriate wording in a specific participant context.6 A particular word or phrase in thesurvey item may carry an unintended meaning in the participant context. It is also possible thatthe content of a survey item, while applicable to a different domain, may not represent the surveyconstruct in the participant domain. For example, taking time each week to work on side projectsmay be linked to innovation among professional engineers,18 but this action may carry differentmeaning to engineering students who may not link side projects to engineering innovation.Item analysis is a quantitative technique for understanding the functioning of individual items inthe overall survey.2 Quantitative data
of Engineering and Technology and National University of Singapore respectively. He has published more than 50 papers in refereed journals and international conferences and contributed to books, and been involved in several internal and external funded research projects in these areas. He has received numerous research awards including ’Best Paper Award - ATMAE 2014’, ’Outstanding Paper Award – SME, 2012,’ ’A.M. Stickland Best Paper Award – IMechE, 2010,’ and ’Most Downloaded Paper – Elsevier, 2010.’Dr. A. Mark Doggett, Western Kentucky University A. Mark Doggett is an Associate Professor and the Coordinator for the Master of Science Degree in Engineering Technology Management at Western Kentucky University. His
promising from the literatureavailable that discussed it. TermWatch is an academic project that claimed to handle multiword phrases [34]. Contact was made with one of the two primary academics associated withthe project. This academic suggested that the tool may well serve the stated need but it wouldbe necessary to contact the second academic who managed the codebase. Despite severalrequests, the Term Watch software was never made available for use.Computational grouping of the gathered remote laboratory characteristics sounded like agood idea but in practice was infeasible. The next section talks about how the characteristicswere grouped in practice.4.2 Procedure for Grouping Remote Laboratory CharacteristicsThe arrived solution for
. With expertise in the design of PD and learning communities, Beth leads a collaboration with educators as co-PI on an NSF K12 engineering education project. She is the 2014 Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching and the Council for Advancement and Support of Education Massachusetts Professor of the Year.Ms. Isabel Huff, Springfield Technical Community College After participating in the instructional design of Through My Window during her four years as an un- dergraduate, Isabel is thrilled to be working full-time as the outreach coordinator. She graduated summa cum laude from Smith College with a double major in Economics and Spanish in Spring 2014 and now works on the Springfield Technical
years of academic experience. He taught courses in Engineering, Computer Science, and Networking. Presently he is teaching courses in Cisco, Microsoft, UNIX, Data Communi- cations, and Emerging Technologies. Dr. Taher began his career as a Project Engineer for Zenith Data Systems Company. He worked at Benton Harbor Plant in Michigan for 2 years. Professor Taher is a member of IEEE and ASEE.Dr. Ahmed S. Khan, DeVry University, Addison Dr. Ahmed S. Khan is a Senior Professor in the College of Engineering and Information Sciences at DeVry University, Addison, Illinois. Dr. Khan has more than thirty-two years of experience in research, instruction, curricula design and development, program evaluation and
Paper ID #11470Engineering Students’ Perceptions of the Future: Exploratory InstrumentDevelopmentAdam Kirn, University of Nevada, Reno Adam Kirn is an Assistant Professor of Engineering Education at University of Nevada, Reno. His re- search focuses on the interactions between engineering cultures, student motivation, and their learning experiences. His projects involve the study of student perceptions, beliefs and attitudes towards becoming engineers, their problem solving processes, and cultural fit. His education includes a B.S. in Biomedical Engineering from Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology, a M.S. in
its battery depletion in 6 months, the resulting (now secure)device would be unacceptable, life-threatening, and impractical to use. Page 26.989.2In this paper, we present integrating emerging cryptographic engineering (used for protecting theaforementioned deeply-embedded systems) research with security education. This project isaddressing the respective tradeoffs between the security levels (noting the larger attack surfacefor deeply-embedded systems) and affording the overheads applicably, which are the two mainfacets of the proposed integration. To meet this objective, we have used such methodology formore than a year in educating graduate
specificcontent area, and micro-communities of practice as those reflecting collaboration of smallercohorts of STEM faculty, in-person and virtually.This study addresses the following research questions: 1) How do engineering faculty involvedin a community of practice engage in knowledge transfer? 2) How does knowledge transfer ofspecific evidence-based instructional practices occur in an engineering faculty community ofpractice?Conducted within a large research project aimed at exploring stages of pedagogical change, thiswork utilizes a qualitative methodology. Nine faculty in a first-year engineering departmentparticipated in hour-long semi-structured interviews exploring use of EBIPs and collaboration.Interviews were analyzed using thematic coding to
Systems and Wearable Computers at CMU. This Lab has developed over 30 novel Page 26.1090.1 mobile computer systems over the last twenty years. Dr. Smailagic has led or participated in numerous NSF, NIH, DARPA, and other research projects. Dr. Smailagic is a Fellow of IEEE and recipient of the Allen Newell Award for Research Excellence from Carnegie Mellon’s School of Computer Science. Dr. Smailagic has been a Program Chairman of over ten IEEE conferences. He was the Chair of the IEEE c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015
Page 26.1141.3with finding this connection in the First-Year Engineering program. While the experience of thetransition from pre-college to First-Year Engineering is characterized by the frustration, reactionsto this frustration include both drawing from pre-college engineering as a source of motivation topersist or leaving engineering to study engineering technology in hopes of eliminating thesources of frustration in First-Year Engineering.The third way of experiencing the transition to college engineering is Tedium. The tedium is dueto having significant prior exposure to engineering projects perceived as more authentic,perceiving First-Year Engineering as less academically intense than pre-college engineering, andrepeating content already
course5.Dyer and Schmalzel13 also reported great difficulty in finding textbooks that were structuredaround a “just-in-time” approach that would be suitable for project work.The course to be described below may be seen as a development of Heywood’s early work. Itis appreciated that in the US other definitions of integration and interdisciplinarity are usedand a substantial discussion of these will be found in Heywood (2005)14 (see also Fogarty,199315). However, there are two points that need to be made.First, the idea of inter-disciplinary study in the British Isles is mostly associated with coursesin which students study two subjects throughout the period of study to the major (honours)level. With rare exceptions it seems that academics do not
scholarly publications in journals, books, and conferences, 60 presentations at national and international events, and $4M in external funding for research, development and technology transfer. In addition, he has supervised ap- proximately 60 research students on Ph.D., M.S, B.S., and other research and development projects. Dr. Schaefer is a registered Professional Engineer in Europe (Eur Ing), a Chartered Engineering (CEng), a Chartered IT Professional (CITP), and a Fellow of the Higher Education Academy (FHEA) in the UK, as well as registered International Engineering Educator (Ing-Paed IGIP). From 2013 to 2014 he served as IGIP’s Founding President for the US region. Dr. Schaefer serves as a peer reviewer for approx
operations research, with a research emphasis on modeling systems under uncertainty. His research has been supported by the government and private sectors and disseminated in a variety of forums. He is a member of the Institute of Industrial Engineers; his honorary affiliations include Tau Beta Pi and Sigma Xi.Dr. Lisa Benson, Clemson University Lisa Benson is an Associate Professor of Engineering and Science Education at Clemson University, with a joint appointment in Bioengineering. Her research focuses on the interactions between student moti- vation and their learning experiences. Her projects involve the study of student perceptions, beliefs and attitudes towards becoming engineers and scientists, and their problem
c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Paper ID #11833Jessica Menold is a second year graduate student interested in entrepreneurship, the design process, andinnovativeness of engineering graduates and professionals. She is currently working as a student mentorin the Lion Launch Pad program, where she works to support student entrepreneurs. Jessica is currentlyconducting her graduate research with Dr. Kathryn Jablokow on a project devoted to the development of apsychometric instrument that will measure the skills, behaviors, and traits of an innovative engineer. Herhope is that this awareness of individual innovativeness levels will
, the Fresnel relations,electromagnetic plane wave theory, Maxwell’s Equations, interference, diffraction, and Fourieroptics. There is also a design project done in teams as well as a presentation on a contemporarytopic in optics by each student.The primary delivery mode of the traditional course is the lecture because, as is typical ofphysics courses, it involves a lot of derivations. Students come to class, take notes as fast as theycan, ask a few questions along the way, and then go home and work a few problems, some ofwhich involve deriving or proving some result from the lecture. Each offering, a few studentscomment on student evaluations that the course does not have enough worked example problemsduring class, that is, it is not applied
Paper ID #13134Retention of First-Year Undergraduate Engineering Students: Role of Psy-chosocial Interventions Targeting First-Generation College StudentsMs. Jennifer Maritza Paz, The University of Texas at Austin, Cockrell School of Engineering Jennifer Paz is a graduate student of the Department of Educational Psychology at The University of Texas at Austin. She received her Bachelor’s Degree in Psychology from Texas State University in 2011. She is currently working with Dr. Mia Markey in the Biomedical Engineering Department at The University of Texas at Austin in a project aimed at improving retention rates of first
been published. Examples include the digitalMichelangelo project that used tracked 3-D scanners to digitize large statues [ 16 ], theviewpoint-based approach of 3-D shape reconstruction using video sequences [17], dense 3-Dreconstruction from unregistered Internet-scale photo collections using appearance-basedclustering techniques [18], surface reconstruction from unorganized 3-D points by solving aspatial Poisson problem [19], and environment and object virtualization using a single 3-D scanner Page 26.1376.4[20,21].There is a body of research focusing on object scanning, and those techniques have been proven tobe suitable for building the
particular focus on bioenergy and bioproducts to STEAM educators and researchers; and2) to develop and provide curricular materials and a set of teaching tools for educators forenhancing multidisciplinary instruction in the areas of sustainable bioenergy and bioproducts.The academy focuses on lessons and activities pertaining to sustainability, systems thinking,bioenergy, bioproducts, bioheat, biopower, and environment and policies related to energyissues. The participants got the opportunity to acquire concrete experiences involving teamwork,time management, and project execution skills; reflected on their learning experiences throughpresentations and the end of the institute; developed concepts related to organic chemistry,physics, engineering
. During the programstudents learn about the STEM field, participate in leadership development, and connect withpeers and faculty. USC’s program is a 4 week program for engineering students (by participatingin the program students can actually earn college credits). During the program studentsparticipate in lectures, fieldtrips, and projects, and learn about the field of engineering as awhole.Though most of the summer bridge programs that were researched are significantly shorter, anddon’t require students to complete college-level courses, much of the co-curricular programming,such as workshops, team building activities, and field trips, proved to be useful in designing theUniversity of Portland summer bridge program.In addition to existing best
NSF-funded projects related to design, including an NSF Early CAREER Award entitled ”CAREER: Engineering Design Across Navajo Culture, Community, and Society” and ”Might Young Makers be the Engineers of the Future?” He has also been part of the teaching team for NSF’s Innovation Corps for Learning, and was named one of ASEE PRISM’s ”20 Faculty Under 40” in 2014. Dr. Jordan also founded and led teams to two collegiate National Rube Goldberg Machine Contest cham- pionships, and has co-developed the STEAM LabsTM program to engage middle and high school students in learning science, technology, engineering, arts, and math concepts through designing and building chain reaction machines. He has appeared on many TV
University Jennifer Francis is a graduate student at West Virginia University in the College of Education and Hu- man Services in the Education Research and Evaluation master’s program. Her research interests include mathematics education, project/problem based learning, and evaluations of a variety of educational pro- grams. Page 26.418.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Creating Inclusive Environments in First-Year Engineering Classes to Support Student Retention and LearningIntroductionA new NSF-funded experimental study seeks to incorporate
and keeping the required efficiency required for homes in Vermont. Thereduction in cost and application of different materials will continue to evolve as the studentsfurther examine the micro houses and explore alternative construction techniques andThe core micro-house module is designed to contain basic amenities, such as kitchen andbathrooms. Two walls of the core module are designed so that additional room modules can bereadily attached. These “add-in” modules can be designed to be more flexible and less expensiveto manufacture than the core module, and can vary depending on the needs of the occupant.This project will serve to demonstrate how houses could be constructed in stages from micro-houses, with the micro-houses being combined
Paper ID #12169Expanding Perception: How Students ”See” FluidsMs. Katherine Goodman, University of Colorado, Boulder Katherine Goodman is currently a graduate student at the University of Colorado Boulder in the ATLAS Institute, working toward a Ph.D. in Technology, Media, and Society. Her research is in engineering education, with a focus on fluids and design courses. She holds a B.S. in mathematics and a masters of professional writing. She has previously worked as a technical writer and project coordinator, and as an instructor in composition at the University of Southern California and the Community College of
Paper ID #12177Exploring Contemporary Issues in Sustainable EnergyDr. Paul Gannon, Montana State University Associate Professor, Chemical EngineeringDr. Ryan Anderson, Montana State UniversityMr. Justin W Spengler, Montana State UniversityDr. Carolyn Plumb, Montana State University Carolyn Plumb is the Director of Educational Innovation and Strategic Projects in the College of En- gineering at Montana State University (MSU). Plumb has been involved in engineering education and program evaluation for over 25 years. At MSU, she works on various curriculum and instruction projects including instructional development for faculty