Department of Civil Engineering & Construction Engineering Management California State University at Long Beach 1250 Bellflower Blvd., Long Beach, CA 90840 - U.S.A Email: jinlee.kim@csulb.edu Abstract: This paper presents the assessment results from an ongoing NSF TUES project for the Green-BIM teaching method that seeks to deepen the knowledge and skills for BIM technology in order for the construction engineering management students to learn the state-of-art skills and knowledge of sustainability practices. The Green- BIM teaching method developed by the author was used to teach a construction management course offered at
Paper ID #11481Facilitating Problem-Based Learning with an Inverted ClassroomDr. Gregory S Mason, Seattle University Gregory S. Mason was born and raised in Spokane Washington. He received the B.S.M.E. degree from Gonzaga University in 1983, the M.S.M.E. degree in manufacturing automation from Georgia Institute of Technology in 1984 and the Ph.D. degree in mechanical engineering, specializing in multi-rate digital controls, from the University of Washington in 1992. He worked in a robotics lab for the Department of Defense for five years after receiving his M.S.M.E. He is currently an Associate Professor in the De
Paper ID #11368Project-based Learning in Manufacturing Processes CourseDr. Tumkor Serdar, University of Pittsburgh, Johnstown Serdar Tumkor is an Assistant Professor of Mechanical Engineering Technology at University of Pitts- burgh at Johnstown. Dr. Tumkor has 20 years of experience in academia, having taught at Stevens Institute of Technology and Istanbul Technical University. His 25 years engineering experience includes design, manufacturing, and product development. He has been lecturing Manufacturing Processes, Machine De- sign, Engineering Design, and Computer Aided Technical Drawing courses
for digital transformation of education to support effective integration and seamless adoption of advanced learning technologies into education. In addition to her work focusing on STEM learning in K-20 educational settings, her research was also carried out in professional contexts including army, aircraft maintenance, air-traffic control, emergency response, en- vironmental sciences, climate change, medical education, instructional design, architecture, construction science, mechanical engineering, industrial engineering, and systems engineering.Uzair Nadeem, Prairie View A&M University I am a junior mechanical engineer at Prairie View A&M University. I currently tutor in UGS NX 7.5, a CAD based class
the secondsemester after taking Mechanics. Particularly, as some departments (e.g., Biological andAgricultural Engineering and Engineering Technology) guided the course to be taken in the firstor second semester of sophomore, relatively fewer number of students achieved the coursecredits. While on average, about 72% of FTIC students and about 28% of FTT students achievedcredits on the courses by taking the courses at the institution. In contrast, about 7% of FTICstudents and about 62% of FTT students achieved the transfer credits on the common courses. Page 26.1728.6Table 3. 2006 Cohort FTIC and FTT Students’ Course Credits on FYE Common Courses
Paper ID #11342Expanding Photonics Education in the International Year of LightDr. Anca L. Sala, Baker College, Flint Dr. Anca L. Sala is Professor and Dean of Engineering and Computer Technology at Baker College of Flint. In addition to her administrative role she is involved with development of new engineering and technology programs and curriculum, improving teaching and assessment of student learning, assessment of program outcomes and objectives, and ABET accreditation. She is a founding member of Mi-Light Michigan Photonics Cluster, and is active in the ASEE, ASME, and OSA professional societies serving in various
long-term11-15. Case-Based instruction has been used extensively in medical andlaw schools to prepare students for the real world practices8,15-17. With the success of case-basedinstruction seen in medical and law curriculums, an increasing number of science, technology,engineering and math (STEM) instructors have begun to integrate cases into their courses. A newchampion for the use of cases in the sciences emerged in 1994 with the work of Herried andfunding from the National Science Foundation to form the National Center for Case StudyTeaching in the Sciences (NCCSTS). This educational pedagogy promotes the use of cases, orinteractive “stories”, to engage students in STEM courses and to help reform STEM instruction14,18-20 . These
orderto enhance the understanding of the bio-nano interfaces [8, 9]. Such interdisciplinary educationallows us to begin to predict the biological response to nanomaterials in order to more rationallydevelop materials such as diagnostic, therapeutic, imaging, and theranostic agents and implantmaterials [10]. Under the funding support from National Science Foundation-NanotechnologyUndergraduate Education (NUE) in Engineering we have developed a plan to enhanceundergraduate student learning in bioengineering and provide students with researchexperiences, introducing them to the area of bio-nano devices and systems. Our plan integratesnanoscale technologies with biological systems in the development of new materials, biomimeticnanostructures, tools
connecting the community of students andengaging them in intellectual activities including multi-day face-to-face meetings, field trips,webinars, peer interaction through a forum in a learning management system, a virtual world,and online communication(8). Based on observations and participant feedback about cohortdevelopment over several years of NEES REU programs, Virtual Peers Teams (VPTs) wereintroduced to the program in 2013. The VPTs were modeled on industry virtual teams and peerteams used in education. These teams were organized around goals to develop students’: Professional identity as researchers and practitioners (specifically in earthquake engineering) Collaborative and technological skills associated with working
; Divitini, M. (2009). Shared timeline and individual experience: Supporting retrospective reflection in student software engineering teams. In Software Engineering Education and Training, 2009. CSEET'09. 22nd Conference on (pp. 85-92). IEEE.27. Lunt, B. M., & Helps, C. R. G. (2001). Problem solving in engineering technology: Creativity, estimation and critical thinking are essential skills. In Proceedings, ASEE Annual Conference.28. Martin, T., Petrosino, A. J., Rivale, S., & Diller, K. R. (2006). The development of adaptive expertise in Page 26.171.12 biotransport. New Directions for Teaching and
Paper ID #13923Reality in the Nuclear Industry: Augmented, Mixed and VirtualMiss Ya¨el-Alexandra Jackie Monereau, Elyape Consulting, LLLP.; The University of Tennessee (Knoxville) Ya¨el-Alexandra J. Monereau was born in Brooklyn, New York. She received her B.S. degree in con- struction management from Southern Polytechnic State University and since then she has taken leave from a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering Technology and is presently teaching at a Harmon STEM School in Tampa, FL. Recently, teaming up with Prewitt Solutions, LLC., Ya¨el hopes to help develop STEM education amongst the generations. From 2011 to 2013, she
is the past chair of the IN/IL section. He is a fellow of the Teaching Academy and listed in the Book of Great Teachers at Purdue University./ He was the first engineering faculty member to receive the national Campus Compact Thomas Ehrlich Faculty Award for Service-Learning. He was a co-recipient of the National Academy of Engineering’s Bernard Gordon Prize for Innovation in Engineering and Technology Education and the recipient of the National Society of Professional Engineers’ Educational Excellence Award and the ASEE Chester Carlson Award. He is a fellow of the American Society for Engineering Education and the National Society of Professional Engineers.Dr. Carla B. Zoltowski, Purdue University, West Lafayette
that lag behindother majors, particularly among students in the physical and life sciences and engineering. Forthe 2012-13 academic year, the most recent for which data is available, social science, business,and humanities majors comprised over half of all U.S. students studying abroad for academiccredit, while physical and life sciences accounted for just 8.8%, and engineering for just 4.1%.3In comparison with earned bachelor’s degrees in S&E, this means that just 6.7% of S&Estudents nationwide study abroad.4 While the participation in study abroad among S&Estudents has been slowly rising over time, the low engagement of S&E students has persisted inspite of the Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET
Paper ID #12824Identifying Roles in University-Industry Research PartnershipsLynette F. Wilcox, Virginia Tech Lynette Wilcox is a doctoral candidate in Industrial and Systems Engineering at Virginia Tech. She has been investigating various aspects of academic and industrial partnering while completing her dissertation research on trust in university-industry research partnerships. Lynette has held administrative and research assistantships with the NSF Center for e-Design to support her research work in this area. Additionally, Lynette also holds a Master’s degree in Industrial and Systems Engineering and a Bachelor’s
, communication, computer aided design, ethics, andteamwork, are practiced continuously during these courses. Figure 1 enumerates the key aspectsof the curriculum, their explanations, and their student outcome reference on the AccreditationBoard of Engineering Technology (ABET) Criterion 3. 9 Page 26.1436.3 ABET ref. Curriculum Key Aspect Example activities Criteria •Students solve problems for clients from industry or non-profit organizations •Regular client meetings provide opportunities for students to receive E, C, Client-based and
Paper ID #11140How Professional Society Membership is Affected by Returning Student Sta-tusDr. Anne M Lucietto, Purdue University Dr. Lucietto is a Visiting Assistant Professor in the School of Engineering Technology at Purdue Univer- sity.Dr. Diane L Peters, Kettering University Dr. Peters is an Assistant Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Kettering University. Page 26.859.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 How Professional Society Membership is
Communication Society, he is primarily interested in designing curricula and tools which can help engineers and scientists develop life-long competencies in communication. In the past seven years he has also been the Lead of co-Principal Investigator in projects related to the design, implementation and assessment of learning technologies, especially in the domains of language learning, health communication and public discourse.Suguru Ishizaki, Carnegie Mellon University Suguru Ishizaki is an Associate Professor of Rhetoric and Communication Design in the Department of English at Carnegie Mellon. His current research interests include pedagogy of commu-nication and de- sign for students and professionals in the technology
Competition. He has worked for United Technologies (Hamilton Sundstrand) and General Dynamics on numerous projects including International Space Station Life Support, Joint Strike Fighter Propulsion Control Systems and U.S. Army Biodefense. He received his B.S. from Vanderbilt University and his M.S. and Ph.D. in Biomedical Engineering from the University of Connecticut. Dr. Browne serves as the Chair of the Engineering Technology Division of the Southeastern Section of ASEE; he also does extensive volunteer work for the FIRST Foundation (For Inspiration and Recognition of Science and Technology).Mr. David George Vutetakis Jr, University of North Carolina, Charlotte Mr. Vutetakis is a graduate student at The University of
Paper ID #13362Entering the First Year of a Multi-disciplinary, Hands-on, Competency-BasedLearning Experience: Hopes and concerns of students, parents and facultyDr. Marisa Exter, Purdue University Marisa Exter is an Assistant Professor of Learning Design and Technology in the College of Education at Purdue University. Dr. Exter’s research aims to provide recommendations to improve or enhance university-level design and technology programs (such as Instructional Design, Computer Science, and Engineering). Some of her previous research has focused on software designers’ formal and non-formal educational experiences and use
Paper ID #12748Curricular Enhancement to Support Activity-Based Learning in Introduc-tory Circuit Analysis CoursesDr. Shiny Abraham, Tuskegee University Shiny Abraham is an Assistant Professor in Electrical Engineering Department at Tuskegee University. She received the B.E. degree in Telecommunication Engineering from Visveswaraiah Technological Uni- versity (VTU), India in 2007 and Ph.D. from Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA in 2012. Her research interests span the areas of wireless communication, cyber security, optimization using Game Theory and engineering education research. Her current research includes
/orcapstone projects are the favored experiences of engineering students during their undergraduateeducation; however, writing reports is often expressed as one of their least favorite experiences.Indeed, engineering students enjoy working with machines, instruments, and numbers rather than Page 26.924.2words. The reality, though, is that effective written communication is a necessary competencyfor engineers because engineers actually spend 20 to 40 percent of their workday writing [1]. Forthis very reason, the Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology [2] has addressed incriterion 3g that “an ability to communicate effectively” in the
education, 21st century skills, and design and evaluation of learning environments informed by the How People Learn framework.Dr. Michael Johnson, Texas A&M University Dr. Michael D. Johnson is an associate professor in the Department of Engineering Technology and In- dustrial Distribution at Texas A&M University. Prior to joining the faculty at Texas A&M, he was a senior product development engineer at the 3M Corporate Research Laboratory in St. Paul, Minnesota. He received his B.S. in mechanical engineering from Michigan State University and his S.M. and Ph.D. from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Dr. Johnson’s research focuses on design tools; specifi- cally, the cost modeling and analysis of
Paper ID #11405Research Experiences for High School Teachers and College Instructors inMechatronics, Robotics and Industrial AutomationDr. Sheng-Jen ”Tony” Hsieh, Texas A&M University Dr. Sheng-Jen (”Tony”) Hsieh is a Professor in the Dwight Look College of Engineering at Texas A&M University. He holds a joint appointment with the Department of Engineering Technology and the De- partment of Mechanical Engineering. His research interests include engineering education, cognitive task analysis, automation, robotics and control, intelligent manufacturing system design, and micro/nano manufacturing. He is also the
prospects of learningin higher level courses and pursuing careers in software engineering. Keywords—software engineering education; engineering pedadogy; project-basedlearning; teamwork;1.0 Introduction It is widely known and acknowledged that there are significant problems with attractingstudents to the STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering and Math) disciplines. As stated inthe recent report from the U.S. Department of Education1 : “A total of 48 percent of bachelor’sdegree students and 69 percent of associate’s degree students who entered STEM fieldsbetween 2003 and 2009 had left these fields by spring 2009. Roughly one-half of these leaversswitched their major to a non-STEM field, and the rest of them left STEM fields by exitingcollege
Paper ID #12170Assessing the Learning Gains of Manufacturing Students in an IntegratedHands-on CurriculumDr. Mukasa E. Ssemakula, Wayne State University Mukasa E. Ssemakula is a Professor in the Division of Engineering Technology, at Wayne State University in Detroit, Michigan. He received his Ph.D. from the University of Manchester Institute of Science and Technology, in England. After working in industry, he served on the faculty of the University of Maryland before joining Wayne State. He is a leader in developing and implementing new pedagogical approaches to engineering education. He also has research interests in
online laboratories and design and use of simulator interfaces for metrologyand quality control systems to enhance the cognitive learning of online labs. The major outcomesof the project are: 1) Facilitate student exposure to potential careers in the area of manufacturingtechnology and CN, while improving the precision metrology skills shortages by incorporatingcurrent advances in CNC technology and engineering metrology into the undergraduate/adultlearning environment. The emphasis is placed on the laboratory activities and projects tosimulate innovative design, analysis, process simulation, and prototyping and improvementcycle. 2) Using Project Centered Learning (PCL) pedagogy in the learning modules, students aredeveloping skills to confront
Paper ID #12310CA2VES, an NSF Regional Center, Enhancing the Engineering and Techni-cian Education PipelineDr. Kristin Kelly Frady, Clemson University Dr. Kris Frady is the Director of Operations for the Clemson University Center for Workforce Devel- opment. Additionally, she has earned experience in the corporate sector working with Blackbaud Inc., designing and delivering professional training seminars in online, blended, and live environments. She also has experience in the educational sector in both live and online environments as an adjunct instruc- tor in computer technology for Greenville Technical
, while advisor support was more important to autonomy and relatedness.According to a recent NACADA keynote address, advisors must think of themselves asintentional interaction designers.3 Advising is moving from disseminating campus information tostimulating learning, setting expectations, and establishing goals. Intentional interactions getindividual students to grow, understand their options, and want to persist at college.Opportunities exist use orientation sessions, testing and placement programs, online sessions(group or individual), and apps.Intrusive advising can help underprepared science, technology, engineering, or mathematics(STEM) students. In one intrusive advising program, orientation meetings, multiple meetingsduring the first
J. and Hugh Jack, “Reinventing Manufacturing Engineering: Refocusing and Exploring Future Opportunities for Students,” ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, 2005, pp.12181-‐90. 7) Johnson, Daniel P., “Updating the Objectives of a Manufacturing Engineering Technology Program,” ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, 2005, pp. 14883-‐95. 8) Mason, Greg, “Results of an Industry Survey on Manufacturing Engineering and Manufacturing Engineering Education,” Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 87, No. 3, July 1998, pp. 211-‐214. 9) Wosczyna-‐Birch, Karen and Karl Prewo, “Next Generation Manufacturing,” ASEE
Advancement of Science (AAAS) Science and Technology Policy Fellowship in 2013-2014, with a placement at the National Science Foundation.Ms. Aubrie Lynn Pfirman, Clemson University Aubrie L. Pfirman is a Ph.D. student in Department of Engineering and Science Education at Clemson University. Her research interests are in the experiences of doctoral students in chemistry and the social capital of underrepresented students in STEM. Ms. Pfirman received a B.S. in Chemistry and an Instruc- tional I Certification in Secondary Education from Misericordia University, and she also received her M.S. in Chemistry from Clemson University.Rachel K. Anderson, Clemson University Rachel Anderson is a doctoral student in Engineering and