Figure 4: Chua’s breadboard layout using Fritzing. Figure 5: Fully constructed Chua’s circuit. Page 26.348.8USB Soundcard ScopeIn order to visualize the chaotic attractor one would typically use an oscilloscope (see Figure 6),however such devices are frequently out of the price range for hobbyists and students to makea simple demonstration. Moreover, the measurement of analog signals using a Line-In port of adesktop soundcard is no longer a relevant solution to replace an oscilloscope. The 1990’s desktopscame commonly equipped with a soundcard which included a Line-In port. The current computermarket is split between desktop and laptop computers
. Twombly, Mark H. Salisbury, Shannon D. Tumanut, and Paul Klute Study Abroad in a New Global Century: Renewing the Promise, Refining the Purpose Wiley Periodicals (2012).10. Mark E. Mendenhall, Joyce S. Osland, Allan Bird, Gary R. Oddou, Martha L. Maznevski, Michael J. Stevens, and Gűnter K Stahl Global Leadership: Research, Practice, and Development 2nd Edition; Routledge (2013).11. Ross Lewin, ed., The Handbook of Practice and Research in Study Abroad Routledge, (2009). Page 26.372.13
technical support.We’d also like to thank Tim Stelzer for conversations that helped lead to and helped shape thiseffort.References [1] J. L. Azorlosa and C. H. Renner. The effect of announced quizzes on exam performance. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 33:278–83, 2006. [2] B. S. Bloom and D. R. Krathwohl. Taxonomy of educational objectives book 1: Cognitive domain. Addison Wesley Publishing Company, 1984. [3] F. M. Kika, T. F. McLaughlin, and J. Dixon. Effects of frequent testing of secondary algebra students. Journal of Educational Research, 85:159–62, 1992. [4] T. Kuo and A. Simon. How many tests do we really need? College Teaching, 57:156–160, 2009. [5] C. E. Nelson. Student diversity requires different approaches to college
response(s) is(are) most important. Figure 1: Predicted Responses for the Hanging Bar of Homogeneous Specific Weight, γPresenting a force (flexibility) method in the opening example helps students connect FEA to ear-lier coursework. Course lectures and assignments subsequently transition to the direct stiffnessmethod. Students solve spring and bar problems, then use coordinate system transformation matri-ces to analyze trusses. One dimensional heat transfer round out coverage of second order methods.The theory phase of the course completes with elastic beam analysis. For the second course of-fering (2014), this included activities to build upon laboratory exercises students had previouslyconducted in Strengths of Materials and Vibrations
. Individual Differences in Solving Physics Problems. 1978:325–348 3. Eccles JS, Wigfield A. Motivational Beliefs , Values , and Goals. Annu Rev Psychol. 2002. 4. National Academy of Engineering. Advance Personalized Learning. NAE Gd Challenges Eng. 2012. 5. McGough C, Benson L, Kirn A. Relationships between Engineering Students’ Future Time Perspectives and Their Problem Solving Processes. In: NARST Conference.; 2015. 6. Kirn AN. The Influences of Engineering Student Motivations on Short-Term Tasks and Long-Term Goals. Dissertation. 2014. 7. Nickerson RS. Thinking and Problem Solving. 2nd ed. (Carterette E, Friedman M, Sternberg R, eds.). Academic Press; 1994:425–430. 8. Grigg S, Benson LC. A coding scheme
, 1968.20- Guo, E., Gilbert, S., Jackman, J., Starns, G., Hagge, M., Faidley, L., & Amin-Naseri, M. (2014). Statics Tutor: Free Body Diagram Tutor for Problem Framing. In Intelligent Tutoring Systems (pp. 448-455). Springer International Publishing.21- Corbett, A. T. and Anderson, J. R.: Knowledge tracing: Modeling the acquisition of procedural knowledge. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 4(4), 253-278. (1995) Page 26.440.17
Physics course designed to assist student s with the transition to post-secondary education. He is a Co-Director of the NYS STEP Program, IMPETUS which provides economically disadvantaged students the opportunity to pursue their interest in math and science though educational summer camps, workshops, school-year tutoring and mentoring programs. He has helped provide numerous students and teachers with the opportunity to integrate STEM disciplines using real-world problem solving strategies through teacher/coach training institutes and contest coordination. He is the Adirondack Regional Science Olympiad Coordinator.Robert Prout Jaspersohn, Clarkson University Robert Jaspersohn is a PhD candidate in Physics at Clarkson
-Project.pdf .8. Dimitriu, D. and Karimi, A., 2005, “Exploring the Engineering Profession-A Freshman Engineering Course,” ASEE 2004-1793, Proceedings of the 2005 ASEE Annual Conference, June 12-15. Portland, Oregon.9. Karimi, A., 2002, “Does Problem Solving Recitation Session Improve Student Retention and Success?,” ASEE 2002-2793, ASEE Annual Conference, June 16-19, Montréal, Quebec Canada.10. Karimi, A., 2001, “Implementing a New Mechanical Engineering Curriculum to Improve Student Retention,” ASEE 2001-1566, ASEE Annual Conference, June 24-27, Albuquerque, New Mexico.11. Karimi, A., Bench, S., and Hodges, Susan, 2001, “Improving Engineering Student Retention in an Urban University,” Annual Meeting of the Gulf-Southwest
. Additional funding for undergraduate research was provided by the 2014 Seattle UniversityFr. Woods Fellowship Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed inthis material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NationalScience Foundation.Bibliography1 National Academy of Engineering, Educating the Engineer of 2020: Adapting Engineering Education to the New Century, Washington DC: The National Academies Press, 2005.2 ABET, "Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs Effective for Evaluation During the 2009-2010 Accredidation Cycle," ABET Engineering Accreditation Commission, 2008.3 American Society for Civil Engineering, "Civil Engineering Body of Knowledge for the 21st Century
research, and facilities layout. Before joining to SIUE he worked at Rochester Institute of Technology as a faculty member and Computer Integrated Manufacturing System project coordinator for RIT’s integrated circuit factory. He is a senior member of IIE and SME, and a member of ASEE, Alpha Pi Mu and Tau Beta Pi.Dr. Hasan Sevim, Southern Illinois University, Edwardsville Page 26.718.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 International Cooperation in an Industrial Engineering Dual-diploma Program S
] Fantz, T., Siller, T., and DeMiranda, M. (2011). Pre-collegiate factors influencing the self-efficacy of engineering students. Journal of Engineering Education, 100(3), 604-623.[5] Hackett, G. (1985). Role of mathematics self-efficacy in the choice of math-related majors of college women and men: A path analysis. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 32(1), 47-56.[6] Jenson, R., Petri, A., Day, A., Truman, K., and Duff, K. (2011). Perceptions of self-efficacy among STEM students with disabilities. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 24(4), 269-283.[7] Zeldin, A., Britner, S., and Pajares, F. (2008). A comparative study of the self-efficacy beliefs of successful men and women in mathematics, science, and technology
E.g. Okabe, D. (2004). Emergent social practices, situations and relations through everydaycamera phone use. In Proceedings of the International Conference on MobileCommunication and Social Change. Seoul, Korea.5 E.g. Kukulska-Hulme, A. (2013). Limelight on mobile learning: Integrating education andinnovation. Harvard International Review, 34(4), 12.6 Traxler, J. (2007). Defining, Discussing and Evaluating Mobile Learning: The moving finger writes and havingwrit.... The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 8(2).7 E.g. Ally, M. (Ed.). (2009). Mobile learning: Transforming the delivery of education and training. AthabascaUniversity Press.8 E.g. Anastopoulou, S., Sharples, M., & Baber, C. (2011). An evaluation of
, 133(2), 99-106. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)1052-3928(2007)133:2(99).[2] Bernold, L. E., Bingham, W. L., McDonald, P. H., & Attia, T. M. (2000). Impact of holistic and learning-oriented teaching on academic success. Journal of Engineering Education, 89(2), 191-199.[3] Honken, N., & Ralston, P. S. (2013). Freshman Engineering Retention: A Holistic Look. Journal of STEMEducation: Innovations And Research, 14(2), 29-37.[4] Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology, "Criteria for accrediting engineering programs," 2014.[5] Information literacy competency standards for higher education. http://www.ala.org/acrl/standards/informationliteracycompetency.[6] A. Naimpally, H. Ramachandran and C. Smith, Lifelong Learning for Engineers and
? Content specific feedback related to What is the current treatment option? technologies discussed What is your source(s) for information? Entrepreneurship feedback related to How would you find more relevant complementary skills information? Week 9 Week 4 o Final Project Assignment o Lecture Overview of final project Opportunity Recognition starts with finding a Discussion of deadlines and requirement need. Week 11 Comparison of finding problems in education o Final
There are a wide range of student perceptions about the panels, and this is unlikely to change Creating competitiveness between students is difficult and that these panels seem to have failed in that endeavor6.0 AcknowledgementsThanks are due to the individuals who served as panel members alongside the authors of thispaper. Dr. Dennis D. Truax is also owed thanks for helping to facilitate several items associatedwith the 2014 CE 3311 offering, and for working toward a solution allowing SPM’s. Page 26.832.137.0 Bibliography1. Larson, D., McKean, R., Cramer, S. (2014). “Learning Outcomes: Less is More-ABET’s Criterion 3 Needs
help rectify this situation. In the process,it is believed that enthusiasm for engineering and science will increase among both adults andyoung people. Survey data indicates that demonstrating the underlying ingenuity behind nature,as exemplified above, has been moderately successful in accomplishing this goal.Thus far, as a part of this grant-funded project, 79 presentations have been made to communitygroups, churches and Christian schools with a total audience of 2,500 people. A diverse selectionof 23 of these groups was anonymously surveyed in an attempt to assess the impact of thepresentations and drive improvements for the future. The presentations typically close with livelyquestion and answer sessions between speaker(s) and audience. A
Krathwohl, D. 1956. Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, the Classification of Educational Goals, Handbook I: Cognitive Domain. David McKay, New York, NY. 13. ASCE. 2011. Program Criteria for Civil and Similarly Named Engineering Programs. (https://www.asce.org/uploadedFiles/Education_and_Careers/University_Curriculum_Development/Conte nt_Pieces/criteria-for-accrediting-civil-engineering-programs.pdf). 14. Estes, A.C. and Lenox, T.A. 2014. “New Civil Engineering Program Criteria: How the Sausage is Being Made.” Proceedings of the 2014 Annual Conference of the American Society for Engineering Education, Indianapolis, IN. 15. Ressler, S. J. 2008. “Influence of the New Civil Engineering Body
Vision." International Journal of Engineering Education (1999): 376-382.12. Roemer, Robert, et al. "A SPIRAL Learning Curriculum in Mechanical Engineering." The 117th Annual Conference of the American Society for Engineering Education. Louisville, KY, 2010. AC 2010-1903.13. Besterfield-Sacre, Mary, Larry Shuman, Cynthia Altman. “Pittsburgh Freshman Attitudes Survey” http://civeng1.civ.pitt.edu/~outcomes/14. Kolb, David A., “ Learning Style Inventory Manual” , McBer, Boston, 1976.15. Prenzel, M. “ The selective persistence of interest”, In K.A. Renninger, S. Hidi & A. Krapp (Eds.), Interest in learning and development. 1992. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers (71-98).16. Urban-Lurain, Mark, et al
://www.griffith.edu.au/centre/gihe/griffith_graduate/home.html.7. Krajcik, J. S. (2010, April 23). Supporting Students in Developing Literacy in Science. Science, pp. 456-459.8. Chan, V. (2011). Teaching Oral Communication in Undergraduate Science: Are We Doing Enough and Doing it Right? Journal of Learning Design, 71-79.9. Noblitt, L. V. (2010). A comparison of case study and tradition teaching methods for improvement of oral communication and critical thinking skills. Journal of College Science Teaching, 26-32.10. Garber, R. I. (2011, August 14). 20 fears for a new millennium - replacing the 1977 Book of Lists . Retrieved from Joyful Public Speaking: http://joyfulpublicspeaking.blogspot.com/2011/08/20-fears-for-new-millennium
; Teasley, S. D.) 63–82 (American Psychological Assossiation, 1991).7. Adams, R. et al. A community of practice approach to becoming an engineering education re- search professional. in 121st ASEE Annu. Conf. Expo. (2014).8. Sattler, B., Carberry, A. R. & Thomas, L. D. Graduate student peer mentoring: A means for creating an engineering education reseracg community. in Am. Soc. Eng. Educ. (2012).9. Jesiek, B. K., Newswander, L. K. & Borrego, M. Engineering Education Research: Discipline, Community, Page 26.1783.14 or Field? J. Eng. Educ. (2009).10. Katehi, L. et al. Development of Graduate Programs
to be employed. That andother additions will soon to be realized.References[1] Sirinterlikci, A., Sirinterlikci, S., Utilizing Rep-Rap Machines in the Engineering Curriculum, 2014 ASEE Annual Conference.[2] Jaksic, N., New Inexpensive 3-D Printers Open Doors to Novel Experiential Learning Practices in Engineering Education, 2014 ASEE Annual Conference.[3] Ertekin, Y., Husanu, C., N.,I., Chiou, R., Konstantinos, J., Interdisciplinary Senior Design Project to Develop a Teaching Tool: Dragon Conductive 3-D Printer, 2014 ASEE Annual Conference.[4]Technology Overview DLP Process.EnvisionTec. http://envisiontec.com/technology-overview/. Accessed on December 31, 2013.[5] DIY DLP Printer. Dimensionext. http://www.dimensionext.co.uk
Engineering Education Conference& Exposition,Annual Conference, 2005.11. Seymour, E., Hewitt, N.(1997) Talking About Leaving: Why Undergraduates Leave the Sciences. WestviewPress, Boulder, CO12. Ohland, M., Sheppard, S., Lichtenstein, G., Eris, O., Chachra, D., Layton, R., “Persistance, Engagement, andMigration in Engineering Programs” Mechanical Engineering (2008)13. Eris, Ozgur; Chachra, Debbie; Chen, Helen; Sheppard, Sheri D.; Ludlow, Larry; Rosca, Camelia; Bailey, Tori;and Toye, George, "Outcomes of a Longitudinal Administration of the Persistence in Engineering Survey"(2010). 2010. Paper 3.14. Shuman, L., Delaney, C., Wolfe, H., Scalise, A., and Besterfield-Sacre, M., “Engineering Attrition: StudentCharacteristics and Educational Initiatives
. Page 26.40.15References1. Sheppard, S., and R. Jenison. (1997). Examples of Freshman Design Education. International Journal ofEngineering Education 13(4). 248-61.2. Dally, J.W., and G. Zhang. (1991). Experienced in Offering a Freshman Design Course in Engineering.Proceedings of the Conference on New Approaches to Undergraduate Education. July, 1991. Banff, Canada.3. Frank, M., I. Lavy, and D. Elata. (2003). Implementing the Project-Based Learning Approach in an AcademicEngineering Course. International Journal of Technology and Design Education 13. 273-88.4. Marra, R.M., B. Palmer, and T.A. Litzinger. (2000). The Effects of a First-Year Engineering Design Course onStudent Intellectual Development as Measured by the Perry Scheme. Journal of
Society of Engineering Education, 20124. Anderson, L.W. et al. A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing. Addison Wesley Longman, Inc., Illinois, 2001.5. Bland, L. “Applying Flip/Inverted Classroom Model in Electrical Engineering to Establish Life-Long Learning,” in Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the American Society of Engineering Education, 2006.6. Redekopp, M.W. and Ragusa, G. “Evaluating Flipped Classroom Strategies and Tools for Computer Engineering,” in Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the American Society of Engineering Education, 2013.7. Stickel, M., Hari, S., and Liu, Q. “The Effect of the Inverted Classroom Teaching Approach on Student/Faculty Interaction and Students’ Self