, her work includes studies on the teaching and learning of communication, effective teach- ing practices in design education, the effects of differing design pedagogies on retention and motivation, the dynamics of cross-disciplinary collaboration in both academic and industry design environments, and gender and identity in engineering. Page 26.1545.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 The Impact of Personal Interactions on the Experience of African-American Males on Multiracial Student Engineering TeamsAbstractTeam projects in undergraduate engineering programs
reform effort risks being undermined by the curricular and cultural practices thatpervasively shape student experience and outcomes and drive away too many could-be engineerswith diverse interests, aptitudes, lived experiences, and values.PDI’s response to the bait-and-switch problem employs design-oriented logics of engagement inparallel with the fundamentals-first approach, which provides a partial corrective to the logic ofexclusion. This configuration offers educators new avenues for thinking about explicit andimplicit connections between the design-centric emphasis in K-12 and the content-driven modelof fundamentals first. Moving forward, we hope to conduct empirical research using participantobservation and interviews to compare students
: Global Visions of Engineering Practice and Education” [Online],Available: best.berkeley.edu/~aagogino/papers/NSB2005.pdf3. Lam F., Arlett C. and co-authors, “Engineering Graduates for Industry”, The Royal Academy of Engineering, February 2010, London, UK, ISBN 1-903496-52-74. Marquis E, Vajoczki S “Creative Difference: Teaching Creativity Across the Disciplines”, International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning”, vol. 6, no.1, January 2012.5. M. Radu, C. Cole, M. Dabacan, J. Harris, ”The Impact of Providing Unlimited Access to Programmable Boardsin Digital Design Education” IEEE Transactions on Education, Special Edition in Microelectronics Education,May 2011, vol.54, no.2.6. Smith K., Shepard S., Johnson D., Johnson R
at http://ccliconference.org/files/2013/11/Measuring-STEM-Teaching-Practices.pdf[11] Prince, M. (2004). Does active learning work? A review of the research. Journal of engineering education, 93(3), 223-231.[12] DeVellis, R. F. (2012). Scale development: Theory and applications. Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE Publications, Inc.[13] de Ayala, R. J. (2009). The theory and practice of item response theory. New York, New York: Guildford Press.[14] Smith, T. W., (2004). Developing and evaluating cross-national survey instruments. In S. Presser, J. M. Rothgeb, M. P. Couper, J. T. Lessler, E. Martin, J. Martin, & E. Singer (Eds.), Methods for testing and evaluating survey questionnaires (pp. 431-452
perform a reality check on the software results. In most cases, the systems that engi-neers deal with have become complex and involve phenomena from multiple disciplinary do-mains. For example, digital logic, electric-circuit behavior, and heat transfer all play a role in de-signing computer chips. Does our engineering curriculum prepare our graduates to deal withsuch complexity?The authors suggest that the current approach to the engineering curriculum is out of step withthe current practice of engineering. A modification to the early engineering science courses, andpossibly the first-year science and mathematics courses, would serve to change the students’ ap-proach toward problem solving and better prepare them to apply what they learn to
a steady economic growth that will warranty sustainability. In response to these facts, Tecnológico de Monterrey created the Industrial Consortium toFoster Applied Research and attracts top talent, searching for a top graduate program, and askedthe companies to first select and second retain the ones that best fit their needs. After selectingthe best candidates the companies assign them to a full time graduate program that will preparethe students to face the challenges and solve the problems that the company will assign to themthe very first day at the program. The Industrial Consortium started class activities in August2008 with thirteen students, selected by five companies. Before then, it took about one year ofnegotiations to
of Technology Transfer. This support allowed these two teams to designand prototype the product during the fall 2013 and spring 2014 semesters. These two teamsreceived multiple cash awards while competing in the State of North Carolina SocialEntrepreneurship Conference and the Ventureprise business competition. One team built acompany which is still active even after the participants graduated with their Baccalaureatedegrees. Thus far the faculty have supported four entrepreneurial teams in the capstone seniordesign courses.While the entrepreneurship course gives a chance for our students to work with a faculty on thedevelopment of a new product, linking it to the capstone senior design course strengthens thefoundation for our engineering
answer these questions when she teaches some of these methods to engineering, design, business, and law students. Her courses use active storytelling and self-reflective observation as one form to help graduate students and leaders traverse across the iterative stages of a project- from the early, inspirational stages to prototyping, to prototyping some more - and to delivery. Barbara likes to paint pictures.Mr. Ville Mikael Taajamaa, University of Turku Ville M. Taajamaa, MSc (TECH) is in his fourth year of Ph.D studies focusing on engineering education reform. The main focus in the action based research is to create a new model for global interdisciplinary engineering education: O-CDIO where emphasis is more in the
(1), 21-51.3. Fairweather, J. (2008). Linking evidence and promising practices in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) undergraduate education. A Status Report for The National Academies National Research Council Board of Science Education.4. Linenberger, K., Slade, M.C., Addis, E.A., Elliott, E.R., Mynhardt, G., & Raker, J.R. (2014). Training the foot soldiers of inquiry: Development and evaluation of a graduate teaching assistant learning community. Journal of College Science Teaching, 44(1), 97-107.5. Bohrer, K., Ferrier, A., Johnson, D., & Miller, K. (2007). TA training workshops. In K.L. Chase (Ed.), Association for Biology Laboratory Education (ABLE) Proceedings, 29, 67
in Engineering Education department. Her research interest includes graduate studies, global engineering, design for community services. Page 26.442.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Defining and Assessing Global Engineering Competency: Methodological ReflectionsIntroductionResearchers face manifold challenges as engineering education continues to grow and evolve asa distinct field of scholarly activity. For instance, discussions about criteria for evaluatingengineering education research have intensified, including through published
students whoare still in the process of learning how to generate ideas for product design, since it is a strategythat allows students to ensure that their innovation ideas are quickly followed by implementationusing resources close at hand.The final project in this design experience is the Graduation Project (a compulsory requirementfor graduation), conducted during the senior year, with emphasis in research or applications. Theindependent work to be developed in this project aims to provide students with a space forcarrying out the integration of knowledge and skills necessary to properly perform a veryspecific task which involves components of either Product and/or Process Design. Depending onthe level of complexity, such project can be
about the first course in the sequence:CvEEN 1000 Introduction to Civil and Environmental Engineering, CvEEN 3100 TechnicalCommunications for Civil Engineers, and CvEEN 4910 Professional Practice & Design. CvEEN4910 is the capstone course for the program. All three classes are required for graduates of thedepartment’s baccalaureate programs. Each is a one semester experience. Table 1 Professional Skills Outcomes and Courses in the Utah CvEEN Program U. of Semester Course Title BOK Professional Related Outcomes* Utah CreditCvEEN Hours
research experiences with GNSS.References[1] Find it with GPS!, Developed by IEEE as part of TryEngineering (www.tryengineering.org).[2] Bednarz, S. W., and R. H. Audet (1999),The status of GIS technology in teacher preparation programs, Journalof Geography, 98(2), 60-67.[3] Hartell, E. (2010), GPS-performance in technology education, In Knowledge in Technology Education: Volumeone Proceedings (pp. 171-177), Griffith University.[4] Hartell, E. (2012), GPS-Performance in Technology Education Part II, In Explorations of best practice inTechnology, Design & Engineering Education, Volume One (pp. 141-148), Griffith Institute for EducationalResearch.[5] Zecha, S. (2014), Outline of an Effective GPS Education Trail Methodology, 352-361.[6] Walters
establish a line of communication the same way students in a single institution may communicate amongst themselves to team form based on interest and capabilities. • Project support: o The resources section of the website will continue to be expanded ▪ Findings from ongoing research into best practices for exposing undergraduates to system engineering and systems thinking will be used to provide tools and suggestions for students and faculty. ▪ A tool for securely storing relevant project materials will be added to enable sharing across institutions, sponsors, mentors, and if applicable the
important sources of data for identifying areas for improvement. When several options present themselves, time constraints forces a choice, and it is not always an easy matter to decide which. The Lean Manufacturing framework presented here can be used to develop a mechanism for instructors to use to weigh options and point them towards the ones that have the highest potential to positively impact Just-In-Time delivery, use of available brainpower and building-in quality. This can be motivational for the instructor by giving them a priori a degree of confidence that the changes they are considering will have benefit, as opposed to just hoping for the best.3. Promotes collaboration, ownership and teamwork: Teamwork and collaboration
. in Electrical Engineering.Dr. Randa L. Shehab, University of Oklahoma Dr. Randa L. Shehab is a professor and the Director of the School of Industrial and Systems Engineering at the University of Oklahoma. She was recently appointed as Director of the Sooner Engineering Education Center dedicated to engineering education related initiatives and research focused on building diversity and enhancing the educational experience for all engineering students. Dr. Shehab teaches undergraduate and graduate level courses in ergonomics, work methods, experimental design, and statistical analysis. Her current research is with the Research Institute for STEM Education, a multi-disciplinary research group investigating factors
processing research include the design and modeling of intelligent controls, Kalman filters, and automation. Engi- neering education research includes curriculum and laboratory development for these concepts.Mrs. Anastasia Marie Rynearson, Purdue University, West Lafayette Anastasia Rynearson is a Purdue Doctoral Fellow pursuing a degree in Engineering Education at Purdue University. She received a B.S. and M.Eng. in Mechanical Engineering at the Rochester Institute of Technology. Her teaching experience includes outreach activities at various age levels as well as a position as Assistant Professor in the Mechanical Engineering Department at Kanazawa Technical College. Her current research interests focus on early P-12
, he participated in several research assistant positions with a focus in renewable energy and youth education. His research interest include radar and mobile communication signal processing. Address: Information and Telecommunication Technology Center, Nichols Hall, 2335 Irving Hill Rd, Lawrence, KS 66045 Phone: (785) 864-7708 Email: lharnett@ku.edu Page 26.1451.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 System Analysis Methodology for Teaching K-12 Algebra: An Instrument for Introducing the Engineering Design Approach in K-12 Education
Paper ID #13952Concentrated Solar, Dual Axis-Tracking, Multi-junction GaAs Cell Photo-voltaic System Design for Efficient Solar Energy ConversionDr. Mustafa G. Guvench, University of Southern Maine Dr. Guvench received M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in Electrical Engineering and Applied Physics from Case Western Reserve University. He is currently a full professor of Electrical Engineering at the University of Southern Maine. Prior to joining U.S.M. he served on the faculties of the University of Pittsburgh and M.E.T.U., Ankara, Turkey. His research interests and publications span the field of microelectronics including I.C
high school graduates continue on to Baccalaureate-level (B.Eng. or B.Sc.) instruction, and for 50% of these to obtain the higher Candidate’s degree (M.Sc.) Simultaneously, an attempt to contain the costs of higher education through the rationalization of higher education, both through the legislatively mandated consolidation of the nation’s semi-professional schools (those established for teachers, technicians, nurses and others) into a single University College system, and through fiscal policies designed to force administrative restructuring within the nation’s universities. Many nationally funded, not-for-profit research institutes were also absorbed into the nation’s universities under
what thiscareer path would look like in practice, but I’m committed to finding out.About half way through my freshman environmental seminar, my professor, Dr. Walther, askedme if I would be interested in working on a research project in engineering education. Hedescribed a study of media representations of engineering that he was working on with hiscolleague and told me that they were looking for a student who would like to help with dataanalysis. I agreed, and attended his research group’s next meeting. I was initially intimidated byworking with professors on a research project, but I quickly became comfortable after help andencouragement from my supervisors.My participation in this research group formed the context for the present
design reviews prepares students for professional practice, enhances achievement ofboth professional development and solution development, and provides valuable exhibits for students’professional portfolios. The authors of this work-in-progress paper seek collaborators for implementingand testing the proposed assessment structure in capstone design courses.IntroductionConsider this scenario: An engineering graduate walks into a job interview and hands the interviewerachievement scores for his or her teamwork, communication, problem solving, project management,ethics and professional responsibility, willingness to take risks, motivation to continue learning, and otherknowledge, skills and abilities important to the employer. The interviewer
. Page 26.1268.6 The group had two full-scale prototypes of the filters constructed in order to test the design.The filter body was a plastic tank 122 cm high purchased off-the-shelf, which was then modifiedto fit the design. The rest of the materials consisted of PVC pipe and hardware fittings whichwere purchased at a local hardware store. Since the group was uncertain of the type of sand that could be obtained in Uganda, theyinvestigated the impact of different sands on filter performance. They looked for types of sandthat might be commonly available for different construction needs, and thus would be availablein the developing world. Specifically, they obtained a fine “mortar sand” as well as an “all-purpose concrete sand” from a
Institute ofTechnology." In Elements of Quality Online Education: Practice and Direction, edited by J. Bourne and J. C.Moore, 261-78. Needham, MA: Sloan Consortium, 2002. 7. Collis, B., “Course Redesign for Blended Learning: Modern Optics for Technical Professionals,”International Journal of Continuing Engineering Education and Lifelong Learning, 13 (2003): 22-38. 8. Kaleta, R., Skibba, K. and Joosten, T., "Discovering, Designing, and Delivering Hybrid Courses." InBlended Learning: Research Perspectives, edited by A. G. Picciano and C. D. Dziuban, 111-43. Needam, MA: TheSloan Consortium, 2007. 9. Peercy, P. S. and Cramer, S. M., “Redefining Quality in Engineering Education Through HybridInstruction,” Journal of Engineering
tools available to students. Therehas been a tremendous amount of work on best practices for instruction in college courses, andresearchers have identified the value of formative assessments to help students and instructorsidentify strengths and weaknesses and adjust instruction. We add to this discussion byundertaking a psychometric analysis of classroom tests. In particular, we will focus on themeasurement precision when tests are analyzed using Item Response Theory (IRT), a non-linearlatent variable model that evaluates the student’s probability of responding to items correctlyconditional on ability level. A useful byproduct of IRT analysis is that measurement uncertaintyis quantified conditional on ability level, and it often reveals that
: MethodologyThe flipped class format can be used as a more engaging and effective teaching method;however, flipped classes typically require a large amount of materials to be developed. Thesematerials can require a significant upfront time commitment, which can be a barrier for adoption.This can be especially true for a faculty member that has spent years developing a traditionallecture style course.Dr. Anna Howard at NC State has several years experience teaching a flipped statics course.Through some trial and error, best practices were identified for the types of materials to use,including: short three to five minute videos summarizing the lectures key topics29, pencastivideos of example problems, skeleton course notes for students to complete on their
Engineering Education Research Center (EERC) in the Swanson School of Engineering, and serves as a Center Associate for the Learning Research and Development Center. Her principal research is in engineering education assessment, which has been funded by the NSF, Department of Ed, Sloan, EIF, and NCIIA. Dr. Sacre’s current research focuses on three distinct but highly correlated areas – innovative design and entrepreneurship, engineering modeling, and global competency in engineering. She is currently associate editor for the AEE Journal.Dr. Gisele Ragusa, University of Southern California Gisele Ragusa is a Professor of Engineering Education at the University of Southern California. She conducts research on college
methods include the use of content experts, reviews of existinginstruments, and lists of behaviors and descriptors commonly associated with the construct(s) wewish to assess. Unfortunately, however, item creation sometimes becomes overly dependentupon a researcher’s personal attitudes about the construct(s) being tested, or on “borrowing”items from other instruments that may or may not be sound measures of the construct(s) ofinterest. These risks are particularly likely for new researchers in engineering education, whomay have little experience with best practices in social science research.One way to support best practices in the development of new surveys and assessments is to usean instrument blueprint to guide the creation of items, as well
supported after the partnership was initiatedAs a practical matter, almost all of the Cohort 3 students represent very difficult cases thatextend over a very long period of time. These cases also span the two support service structures.Since this research focuses on the role of the SAA partnership in student academic outcomes, we Page 26.1049.8will focus our analysis on Cohorts 1 and 2 only.Data for the cohorts are parsed by a number of different factors, including: number of semestersbefore graduation of our first contact with a student, academic major, gender, race, and status aseither a first-year admit or a transfer student to the school of
tools and application and having also total quality management diploma and being quality master holder dealing with all quality systems as documentation , CAPA management , RCA , facility maintenance and also ISO 9000/2008 expert in addition to being certified from Bernard Castle in UK as sterile area facility Design expert as per ISO regulations . Egyptian pharmacist graduate of 2007 who started my career as a research and development pharmacist in SEDICO pharmaceuticals in EGYPT for about 2 years dealing with new dosage forms formulation and then rotated to Methodology and stability department in which i dealt with dosage form analysis and innovation of new methods of analysis dealing with all laboratory