Paper ID #12565Problematizing Best Practices for Pairing in K-12 Student Design TeamsMs. Gina M Quan, University of Maryland, College Park Gina Quan is a doctoral candidate in Physics Education Research at the University of Maryland, Col- lege Park. She graduated in 2012 with a B.A. in Physics from the University of California, Berkeley. Her research interests include understanding community and identity formation, unpacking students’ re- lationships to design, and cultivating institutional change. Ms. Quan is also a founding member of the Access Network, a research-practice community dedicated to fostering supportive
leadershipeducation programs in Australia and Europe, this report synthesized the data collected in order topropose an engineering leadership education program structure.The current literature available outlines the importance of engineering leadership education andprovides broad summaries of programs and recommendations for best practices. However it failsto provide an overview of the specific details of current engineering leadership programs. Tofurther this field of research, this paper analyzes the specific program goals and learning outcomesof engineering leadership programs. The findings provide a comprehensive understanding of thefocus of current programs, as well as a detailed summary of the key program competencies
Engaging Freshmen Women in Research – Feedback from Students and Best Practices for FacultyIntroductionIncreasing the participation of diverse populations in engineering and technology fields is achallenge for many universities. A significant means to address this issue is to increase theparticipation of women students. However, this can prove to be challenging. In a studyconducted by Marra and Bogue,1 it was found that although women engineering students enterthe university with high levels of self-confidence and self-esteem, those levels decline quicklyduring the first year. They also found through their research, that the initial levels were neverregained. One method to help retain diversity in engineering and technology
engineering economy tools toprovide recommendations based on the results of the analysis. During the trip, the student willvisit a geothermal facility and speak with several experts about geothermal energy, hoping tofind additional useful information for his case study.Benefits of Student-Driven ResearchExposure to student-driven research and design has already had a strongly positive impact onboth the individual students involved and on the institution as a whole. We have also had asurprisingly positive reaction from our Engineering Advisory Council, made up of localemployers. They are particularly pleased with the emphasis on hands-on design and technicalpresentations, and are beginning to ask to be more involved, with mock Product Design
Engineering Education Center dedicated to engineering education related initiatives and research focused on building diversity and enhancing the educational experience for all engineering students. Dr. Shehab teaches undergraduate and graduate level courses in ergonomics, work methods, experimental design, and statistical analysis. Her current research is with the Research Institute for STEM Education, a multi-disciplinary research group investigating factors related to equity and diversity in engineering student populations.Ms. Cindy E Foor, University of Oklahoma Cindy E. Foor is the Associate Director/Research Associate for the Research Institute for STEM Ed- ucation (RISE) at the University of Oklahoma. Her
vision and our future.Prof. Oscar Antonio Perez, University of Texas, El Paso Mr. Oscar Perez received his B.S. and Masters in Electrical Engineering from the University of Texas at El Paso with a special focus on data communications. Awarded the Woody Everett award from the American Society for engineering education August 2011 for the research on the impact of mobile devices in the classroom. He is currently pursuing a PhD in Electrical and Computer Engineering. Mr. Perez has been teaching the Basic Engineering (BE) – BE 1301 course for over 7 years. Lead the design for the devel- opment of the new Basic Engineering course (now UNIV 1301) for engineering at UTEP: Engineering, Science and University Colleges
-based research topics as students are into the second year of their research projects. Thecurriculum will introduce students to practices in many areas of engineering and relateddisciplines. During the course, students apply programming and electronics knowledge to theRaspberry Pi computer and interface with a variety of sensors for real world data collection, suchas wireless water quality sensors. Students can also use robotics platforms for understandingbasic concepts in kinetics, control, programming, and intelligent systems. Other projects arerelated to the design and development of floating platforms and turbines for offshore windenergy. While the aim of this course is on integrating general engineering practices with scienceconcepts, we
lecture courses on developing creativity and research skills. Her current research focuses on identifying impacts of differ- ent factors on ideation of designers and engineers, developing instructional materials for design ideation, and foundations of innovation. She often conducts workshops on design thinking to a diverse range of groups including student and professional engineers and faculty member from different universities. She received her PhD degree in Design Science in 2010 from University of Michigan. She is also a faculty in Human Computer Interaction Graduate Program and the ISU Site Director for Center for e-Design.Dr. Shanna R. Daly, University of MichiganEli M. Silk, Rutgers, The State University of New
. Page 26.891.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Impact of the You’re Hired! Program on Student Attitudes and Understanding of Engineering (RTP, Strand 4)AbstractTo meet the growing need for qualified employees in STEM-based careers, it is critical thatmiddle and high school students participate in activities that increase their awareness ofopportunities in these areas. With proper design, these activities can not only increase awarenessof STEM-based careers, but can also help overcome current stereotypes and lead to a change inattitudes towards these careers. Researchers at North Dakota State College of Science, alongwith the University of North Dakota and North Dakota State
Page 26.894.8Findings section of this paper show results indicating that YSP students showed highlysignificant gains in all areas examined: 1) Fundamentals of neuroscience, engineering, andneuroethics research, 2) Neural engineering best practices, and 3) Connections to neuralengineering industry and careers.Post-program Reflective SurveysAn end-of-program survey was given to YSP students at the conclusion of each summer programto measure the impact on students’ content knowledge and skill set competency in areas ofneural engineering. A retrospective pre-test design was used on some survey questions todetermine if there were statistically significant differences in knowledge of neural engineeringskill sets.13 Considerable empirical evidence
Council of Advisors on Science and Technology (PCAST) in their2012 report2, the fastest way to generate graduates and attain our goal is through differentmethods of teaching, supporting and retaining students. Finding ways to engage them and helpthem to persist is critical to attainment of our goal6. In the following discussion, our partnershipoffers a number of Best Practices that help to generate and maintain students early in thepipeline, engage institutions to common purposes for the good of the students, create cleararticulated pathways in order to build the trust of students and parents, and work with industrialstakeholders as they are realizing that they can no longer take a passive role simply waiting forstudents to exit the
Paper ID #12879Exploring the Impact of Cognitive Preferences on Student Receptivity to De-sign ThinkingMs. Jessica Menold Menold, Pennsylvania State University, University Park Jessica Menold is a second year graduate student interested in entrepreneurship, the design process, and innovativeness of engineering graduates and professionals. She is currently working as a student mentor in the Lion Launch Pad program, where she works to support student entrepreneurs. Jessica is currently conducting her graduate research with Dr. Kathryn Jablokow on a project devoted to the development of a psychometric instrument that will
Paper ID #12268The Impact of a Neuro-Engineering Research Experience for Undergradu-ates Site on Students’ Attitudes toward and Pursuit of Graduate StudiesDr. John D. Carpinelli, New Jersey Institute of Technology Dr. John D. Carpinelli is a Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering at the New Jersey Institute of Technology. He has served as coordinator of activities at NJIT for the Gateway Engineering Education Coalition and as a member of the Coalition’s Governing Board. He previously chaired NJIT’s Excellence in Teaching Awards Committee and is Past Chair of the University Master Teacher Committee.Linda Hirsch, New
students for the changingdesign processes they will encounter after graduation.17,18 Incorporating stakeholder interactioninto the design process can be challenging for students who do not typically encounter thesetasks during early engineering coursework. Prior research on student understanding and use ofstakeholder interaction during the design process has found that students do not always interactwith stakeholders successfully (as outlined in the design practice literature).19–21 Some of thedifficulties student encounter when attempting to interact with stakeholders causes them toneglect or dismiss stakeholder interaction during design.20,22 Thus, more research is needed todevelop pedagogy for teaching these complex processes.This study sought
, Biomedical Device Design and Manufacturing, Automation and Robotics, and CAE in Manufacturing Processes fields.Mr. Keith G Moran JrMr. Christopher Steven Kremer , Robert Morris University Graduated with magna cum laude honors from Robert Morris University in 2014 with a B.S. in Me- chanical Engineering and a B.S. in Manufacturing Engineering. Participated in numerous engineering projects and achieved several academic accolades during my time at Robert Morris. Currently employed for Westinghouse Electric Company, as an engineer, working primarily in the pumps and motors field.Mr. Bruce Allen Barnes Jr, Robert Morris University Projected completed as a senior undergraduate student at RMU.Justin CosgroveSamuel A Colosimo III
Paper ID #12969Teaching as a Design Process: A Framework for Design-based Research inEngineering EducationDr. Margret Hjalmarson, George Mason University Margret Hjalmarson is an Associate Professor in the Graduate School of Education at George Mason University and currently a Program Officer in the Division of Research on Learning in Formal and Infor- mal Settings at the National Science Foundation. Her research interests include engineering education, mathematics education, faculty development and mathematics teacher leadership.Prof. Jill K Nelson, George Mason UniversityCraig Lorie, George Mason University
authored/co-authored over a hundred technical papers and reports during his career in private industry, government and academia. His current research interests are nearshore wave transformations, coastal structures, tsunami inundation, hurricane surges, high performance computing, and engineering education. Page 26.73.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 A New Coastal Engineering Graduate ProgramAbstractA Master of Science degree in Engineering with a Coastal Engineering concentration has beenapproved, students enrolled and several graduates are scheduled for
businessstrategy.With an increased focus on the diffusion of evidence-based instructional practices (EBIPs, alsoreferred to as research-based instructional practices (RPIPs)) in science, technology, engineering,and mathematics (STEM) education, the implications of knowledge transfer in CoP can increasethe understanding of how to facilitate the spread and adoption of these instructional techniques.This paper utilizes Wenger’s work on Cultivating Communities of Practice to define CoP as“groups of people who share a concern or a passion for something they do and learn how to do itbetter as they interact regularly.” Within post-secondary STEM education, this paper recognizescommunities of practice as the formal construct of individual departments related to a
various engineering, IT, and data analysis positions within academia and industry, including ten years of manufacturing experience at Delphi Automotive.Dr. Cheryl A Bodnar, University of Pittsburgh Cheryl A. Bodnar, PhD, CTDP is an Assistant Professor (Teaching Track) in the Department of Chemical and Petroleum Engineering at the Swanson School of Engineering at the University of Pittsburgh. She obtained her certification as a Training and Development Professional (CTDP) from the Canadian Society for Training and Development (CSTD) in 2010, providing her with a solid background in instructional design, facilitation and evaluation. Dr. Bodnar’s research interests relate to the incorporation of active learning techniques
Bachelor of Science in Public Policy from Georgia Tech in 2008. After graduation Anna spent a year working for a private sector event firm before eagerly returning to her alma mater and joining the Center for Education Integrating Science, Mathemat- ics, and Computing in January 2010. Anna completed a Master of Science in Educational Research with a concentration in Research, Measurement, and Statistics from Georgia State University in May 2013.Ms. Marcela Nicole Moreno, CEISMC Marcela Moreno is an Educational Outreach Coordinator for three National Science Foundation projects, SLIDER (Science Learning Integrating Design, Engineering and Robotics), AMP-IT-UP (Advanced Man- ufacturing & Prototyping Integrated to
. Hertzberg is currently Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering at CU-Boulder. She teaches graduate and undergraduate courses in measurement techniques, thermodynamics, fluid mechanics, heat transfer, design and computer tools. She has pioneered a spectacular course on the art and physics of flow visualization, and is conducting research on the impact of the course with respect to visual perception and educational outcomes. Her disciplinary research centers around pulsatile, vortex dominated flows with applications in both combustion and bio-fluid dynamics. She is also interested in a variety of flow field measurement techniques. Current projects include electrospray atomization of jet fuel and velocity and
Paper ID #13847Examining the Influence of an Ill- and Well-defined Problems in a First-YearEngineering Design CourseMs. Jessica E S Swenson, Tufts Center for Engineering Education and Outreach Jessica Swenson is a graduate student at Tufts University. She is currently pursuing a Ph.D. in mechanical engineering with a research focus on engineering education. She received a M.S. from Tufts University in science, technology, engineering and math education and a B.S. from Northwestern University in me- chanical engineering. Her current research involves examining different types of homework problems in mechanical engineering
questions were selected to provide a sense of what the GSIslearned. Further, these reflection questions encourage GSIs to consider how student learning intheir classes would be impacted by the pedagogical practices recommended. This combinationof questions has the potential to shift a senior learner to a more mature dimension on the TAdevelopment spectrum. Therefore, this research moves beyond program evaluation to focus onthe lessons GSIs’ glean from their professional development opportunities. Although there havebeen research studies designed to examine the types of teaching-related professionaldevelopment opportunities available to graduate students, 2, 5 this project is one that specificallyfocuses on examining the experiences of first-term
international research programs found that, in addition to the technical andprofessional impacts, the global or transcultural aspects of these experiences include: a) fuelingthe emergence of ‘best practices’ effective in sustaining transcultural collaborations, b)encouraging the innovative development of a ‘shared work space’ to accommodate culturaldifferences, c) developing and extending research communities beyond the U.S., d) increasingnon-English language proficiencies, e) affirming the centrality and power of language, and f)contributing to solutions of the ‘Global Grand Challenges’.23Despite these benefits, there remains a need for more assessment of specific outcomes. Aworkshop report issued by Sigma Xi regarding how to assess international
Bioengineering from Clemson University in December 2006. He has worked for over 25 years as a biomechanical research engineer, and has co-authored over 200 peer-reviewed conference or journal publications in the areas of biomechanics, biomaterials tribology, engineering education, biomed- ical design and mechanical testing. He directs the Laboratory of Orthopaedic Design and Engineering on the main campus of Clemson University, and in his 7 years since joining the bioengineering faculty, he has graduated 4 PhD students and 15 MS students, and has led or has been a co-PI on numerous multi-disciplinary research teams funded through NASA, DoT, DoD, NIH, NSF, the Gates Foundation, biomedical industry and other regional non-profit
support inthese three areas in a professional development program may contribute to improving STEMcurriculum design. Despite the rise in interest in integrated STEM education, there is little research on thequality of STEM curricular materials and professional development opportunities for teachers tosuccessfully integrate STEM. This study provides evidence for the impact of a professionaldevelopment program that aims to provide opportunities for teachers to explore STEMintegration and develop their own STEM units. Thus, the study findings have implications for thedesign of new STEM education professional development programs for teachers. First, teachersneed opportunities to learn new knowledge and skills to implement integrated
experiences fromthe summer Academy and the lesson plans developed therein, so as to help inform and attractother teachers to such opportunities. The plans are to post on-line the lesson plans developed by Page 26.1605.2participants in the Academy. This would make them available for worldwide access and helpbroaden the program’s reach and impacts.Review of relevant literature Research has identified five core features of best-practices for teacher professionaldevelopment Academies. These include: (a) content focus, (b) active learning, (c) coherence, (d)duration, and (e) collective participation. Content focus is defined by pedagogy and
Vice Chair of Biomedical Engineering with an affiliate appointment in Educational Psychology. Her research interests include vascular biomechanics, hemodynamics and cardiac function as well as the factors that motivate students to pursue and persist in engineering careers, with a focus on women and under-represented minorities.Prof. David Williamson ShafferZachari Swiecki, University of Madison-Wisconsin Graduate student in educational psychology, learning sciences area Page 26.679.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Epistemic Network Analysis as a Tool for
Vermont under David Warshaw. His research interests in- clude novel assessments of educational efficacy, and the molecular bases of cell movement and muscle contraction.Anna Stevenson Blazier, University of VirginiaAlyssa Becker, University of Virginia Page 26.995.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Integration of academic advising into a first-year engineering design course and its impact on psychological constructsIntroduction and SummaryEngineering educators often look to imbue students with behaviors or traits beyond the retentionand recall of facts, or
comments.The peer review process was selected as the vehicle to facilitate diffusion of research-based practices and enhanced teaching effectiveness, as it is through this process thatfaculty share experiences in the classroom in real time; engagement in the process shouldprovide a means by which participants share the best practices and provide constructivefeedback on those practices4. The design of the VAPR process draws on the literatureassociated with diffusion, the use of video cases in professional development, and socialreflexivity to limit the negative aspects of peer feedback and draw out opportunities ofdiffusion that are not readily addressed in current dissemination practices.Diffusion of research-based and innovative practicesThe term