Conference Session

International Division Technical Session 7

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Larry J. Shuman, University of Pittsburgh; Renee M. Clark, University of Pittsburgh; Scott Duplicate Streiner, University of Pittsburgh; Mary E. Besterfield-Sacre, University of Pittsburgh

Tagged Divisions

International

reported for eachsubscale19 (see below). There are different reports about the acceptable values of alpha, rangingfrom 0.70 to 0.9520.Theory of Cultural Development is based on the work of Robert Kegan21 who argued that aspeople grow they are engaged in meaning making. People rely on their thinking, feeling, andrelating with others in forming their life journey. King and Magolda have refined these domainsin describing students in their social-cultural development during their college years, and call thisdevelopmental view “intercultural maturity6,22. The subscales in the GPI that reflect the theory ofcultural development are:  Cognitive – Knowing (α = .66);  Intrapersonal – Identity (α = .74); and  Interpersonal – Social

Conference Session

First-Year Programs Division Technical Session 2A: Using Alternative Measurements to Look at Students and Their Success

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Nick Tatar, Franklin W. Olin College of Engineering; Lauren Van Beek, University of St. Thomas; Laura Ann Lilienkamp, Smith College

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

conduct quantitative and qualitative analysis on students’activity participation by asking students to reflect on their experiences and performing the sameanalysis that has been performed on the activities after the students complete their first semester.The authors are particularly interested in understanding if introducing students to Chickering’sstudent development theory will cause more diversity in students’ choices of what vectors theyparticipate in. The authors plan on expanding the submission form students use to report theirparticipation to include self-reporting of what vectors they believe they engaged in and an areafor students to comment and reflect on their experience.ConclusionStudent development in the first year is complex and

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Technical Session - Retaining and Developing Women Faculty

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Elizabeth Dell, Rochester Institute of Technology (COE); Margaret B. Bailey P.E., Rochester Institute of Technology (COE); Maureen S. Valentine, Rochester Institute of Technology (CAST); Sharon Patricia Mason, Rochester Institute of Technology; Carol Elizabeth Marchetti, Rochester Institute of Technology (COS); DeLois Kijana Crawford, Rochester Institute of Technology; Wendy A. Dannels, Rochester Institute of Technology (NTID)

Tagged Topics

ASEE Diversity Committee, Diversity, Engineering Deans Council

Tagged Divisions

Engineering and Public Policy, Women in Engineering

NTIDcommunity and faculty’s professional development plans. The Connectivity series at RIT issupporting the goals of the AdvanceRIT project by removing barriers to resources that supportcareer success and creating new interventions and resources.AcknowledgementsThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grants0811076 and #1209115. The researchers wishes to express their gratitude for the support of thisproject. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this materialare those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National ScienceFoundation.References1. Hill, C.; Corbett, C.; Rose, A., Why so few. American Association of University Women: Washington D.C

Conference Session

Promoting Engineering and Technological Literacy

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

John Krupczak Jr, NSF Division of Undergraduate Education; Mani Mina, Iowa State University

Tagged Divisions

Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering

- ing philosophy and literacy. In particular how such literacy and competency are reflected in curricular and student activities. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016An Exercise to Promote and Assess Critical Thinking in Sociotechnical ContextThis work addresses a practical means to more clearly link the completion of an ABET-accredited undergraduate engineering degree with critical thinking about sociotechnicalissues. An exercise has been created which can be used to develop and measure an aspectof critical thinking by engineering students in a sociotechnical context. This exercise canbe used as one possible measurement of the ability of an engineering student todemonstrate attainment of ABET

Conference Session

Using Laboratories for Instruction in Mechanical Engineering

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Amanie N. Abdelmessih, California Baptist University

Tagged Divisions

Mechanical Engineering

retirement plan or layoff, new faculty.The tenured faculty elected to cut the pension plan, which was latter restored in full.ManagementType of management reflects directly on the Dean, and Chair, but could also be a reflection ofProvost and President’s policies. Micromanagement and too many rules can hinder anycreativity or progress. An incompetent manager, who says no just to show his/her command,loses the respect of the faculty, and their enthusiasm. The Chair/Dean must be supportive, bysupportive does not mean give sweet vague words, with no real support. Support needs to be byaction, and fighting for his/her faculty, where it counts, not by the manager’s account. Most ofthe tenure of the author at that University, there was a visionary

Conference Session

Pedagogy and Learning Within Engineering Design Graphics I

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Raghu Pucha, Georgia Institute of Technology; Tristan T Utschig, Georgia Institute of Technology; Sunni Haag Newton, Georgia Institute of Technology; Meltem Alemdar, Georgia Institute of Technology; Roxanne Moore, Georgia Institute of Technology; Caroline R. Noyes, Georgia Institute of Technology

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Design Graphics

skill for learning design thinking and influencing the designoutcome.Design thinking in engineering education and challenges:Design thinking reflects the complex processes of inquiry and learning that designersperform in a systems context, making decisions as they proceed, often workingcollaboratively on teams in a social process, and “speaking” several languages with eachother (and to themselves)(10). In cornerstone design courses, design thinking skills thatsupport an iterative loop of divergent (creative) and convergent (critical) thinking throughindividual and team project-based learning environments are needed in addition toinstruction of graphics and visualization tools. Critical thinking skills have a moreestablished history in academia

Conference Session

Understanding the Military Veteran's Human Resource Needs - Transition from Military Service to the Engineering Profession

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jae Hoon Lim, University of North Carolina, Charlotte; Peter Thomas Tkacik, University of North Carolina, Charlotte; Claudia G Interiano, University of North Carolina, Charlotte; Jerry Lynn Dahlberg Jr, University of North Carolina, Charlotte; Caroline Elizabeth Nowell, University of North Carolina, Charlotte

Tagged Divisions

Military and Veterans Constituent Committee

variousstrategies to recruit more minority participants that included sending out multiple, individualizedemails to minority student veterans, hiring an African-American graduate student to reach out forthe small number of minority student veterans, and requesting referrals from a minority facultymember in the college. However, the final sample remained largely homogenous due to theoverall demographics of the student population in the college and lack of positive response fromminority student veterans. All student veterans who volunteered to participate were interviewed.Five of the twenty participants were interviewed twice—individually then later in a group.Individual interviews provided students with an opportunity to take time and reflect on

Conference Session

Works in Progress: Curricula and Pathways

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Lynette Frances Johns-Boast, Australian National University; Gerry Corrigan, Australian National University

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

terms “studentskills” and “learning objectives” were each used by a single individual.Using fewer terms to identify and describe course outcomes and using them moreconsistently, suggests participants had greater familiarity with the design and development ofcourses as opposed to programs. Participants were also more comfortable talking about theircourses and course outcomes rather than the program, again suggesting greater familiaritywith the concept of courses having outcomes than they were with programs having outcomes.Familiarity with courses rather than program curricula was noted by Stark et al. 36. Theliterature that discusses curriculum in higher education also reflects this focus on courses 1,with an emphasis on course rather than

Conference Session

First-Year Programs Division Technical Session 8: Ways to Measure "Things" About Your Course(s)

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Tony Andrew Lowe, Purdue University, West Lafayette; David A. Evenhouse, Purdue University; Dhinesh Balaji Radhakrishnan, Purdue University; Stephen R. Hoffmann, Purdue University, West Lafayette

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

matter, pedagogical approaches, political and personal preferences, orother criteria as dictated by a dynamic group of stakeholders. Many changes originate from aclearly defined need or mandate, while others may sneak in without a full analysis of the course.Repeated and often subtle changes compound to have a significant impact on the course, creatinga narrative reflecting the intents of the faculty and the concerns of the institution as course goalsand methods are updated in each subsequent semester.This paper describes a process to employ engineering education research methods to describe thenature, development, implications, and motivation behind of course changes. We define a sixstep process focused on the use of artifact analysis to

Conference Session

Engineering Economy Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Paul C. Lynch, Penn State University Erie, The Behrend College; Joseph Wilck, United States Air Force Academy; Omar Ashour, Pennsylvania State University Erie, The Behrend College

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Economy

startup businesses. The paper discusses theevolution of the student group from the engineering economy course and the work of theentrepreneurship consulting group that is receiving much attention from program advisory boardmembers, startup businesses, and university leadership.DisclaimerThe views expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect theofficial policy or position of the U.S. Air Force, the U.S. Department of Defense, or the U.S.Government.Introduction and MotivationCompany executives from Alcoa, ADT, and Armstrong among representatives from othercompanies that serve on the Industrial & Professional Advisory Council (IPAC) and a ServiceEnterprise Engineering Advisory Board (SEE) in Industrial

Conference Session

Enhancing Student Success in Two-Year Colleges

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Nicholas P Langhoff, Skyline College; Eva Schiorring; Erik N Dunmire, College of Marin; Thomas Rebold, Monterey Peninsula College; Tracy Huang, Canada College

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Two Year College Division

reading or video assignments that prompted students to thinkabout concepts and strategies for success in what they read or watched, reflect on newknowledge they gained, and how these strategies applied to their own journey throughengineering education.The second hour of the lecture meeting was generally used to explore engineering careersand conceptual background and applications for the lab activities and design projects.Topics included measurements and error analysis, computational methods and analysiswith MATLAB, mechanical properties of materials, trusses and structures, fundamentalelectronics, sensors and signal conditioning, Arduino programming, and robotics andsimple control scenarios.All of the lab activities and design projects listed in

Conference Session

International Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ivan E. Esparragoza, Pennsylvania State University; Uladzislau Ivashyn, Pennsylvania State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

International

multinational projects in an introductoryengineering design course. This paper reports the preliminary findings from a survey based onthe Intrinsic Motivation Inventory (IMI) given to students before starting their participation inthe multinational projects. The data collected provides information in five constructs which are:interest/enjoyment, perceived competence, pressure/tension, perceived choice, andvalue/usefulness. These constructs provide a perception about students’ interests, belief, andfeelings about the international project that reflect their level of motivation and confidence tocarry on the tasks. The data is evaluated and considered in the development of the learningmodule to be incorporated before the project in the same course in the

Conference Session

International Division Technical Session 8

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Alan R. Parkinson, Brigham Young University; Spencer P. Magleby, Brigham Young University; Gregg Morris Warnick, Brigham Young University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

International

and Jerusalem.3.2 Ira A. Fulton College of Engineering and TechnologyThe Ira A. Fulton College of Engineering and Technology at BYU currently has an enrollment of4000 students in five engineering and five technology programs. The college awardsapproximately 600 B.S., 100 M.S. and 20 Ph.D. degrees in a year. These degree totals reflect thedirection of the Board of Trustees that BYU remain predominantly an undergraduate institution.About half of the graduates go on to graduate school.The current college administration began to serve in May of 2005. It was natural that we tooksome time to identify strategic directions we felt would help prepare our students for success inthe 21st century and increase the visibility of the college.Concurrent with

Conference Session

Measuring Learning in Statics & Dynamics

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Christopher Papadopoulos, University of Puerto Rico, Mayaguez Campus; Aidsa I. Santiago-Roman, University of Puerto Rico, Mayaguez Campus; Manuel Jose Perez-Vargas, University of Puerto Rico, Mayaguez Campus; Genock Portela-Gauthier, University of Puerto Rico, Mayaguez Campus; Wadson C Phanord, University of Puerto Rico, Mayaguez.

Tagged Divisions

Mechanics

’ qualitativeunderstanding of basic concepts and principles. CI’s typically consist of multiple choicequestions with one correct answer and several “distractors” that reflect common misconceptions.The misconceptions are usually identified through formal research processes, such as using focusgroups in which students answer questions and explain their reasoning in an expository manner. A CI can be used to assess both individual student learning gains and effectiveness ofpedagogical strategies, particularly by measuring differences in performance via pre-test (beforeinstruction) and post-test (after instruction). If the CI is not appropriate as a pre-test, then itsability to measure learning gains might be established via other correlations, such as with

Conference Session

Works in Progress: Assessment and Research Tools

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Cheryl Q. Li, University of New Haven; Ronald S. Harichandran, University of New Haven; Maria-Isabel Carnasciali, University of New Haven; Nadiye O. Erdil, University of New Haven; Jean Nocito-Gobel, University of New Haven

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

”indicates the validation team’s certainty about their judgements using a three level scale: 1 = notvery sure, 2 = pretty sure, and 3 = very sure, and “Relevance” reflected how well they thought anitem measured what was intended to be measured, using the following scale: 1 = low/norelevance, 2 = somewhat relevant, 3 = highly relevant. Netemeyer, et. al.9 also recommendedretaining items with sureness and relevance levels higher than the means. The items included inthe questionnaire have Sureness > 2.17, which means the judges were quite sure about theirjudgments, and Relevance > 66%, which means more than 66% of the judges rated this item asrelevant to what was intended to be measured. After the content validation process, all 37 itemswere

Conference Session

Trends in Accreditation and Assessment

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Nathan M. Hicks, University of Florida; Richard J. Aleong, Purdue University, West Lafayette

Tagged Divisions

Liberal Education/Engineering & Society

Criterion 3 modifies and restructures the previous 11 outcomes (a)–(k) intoseven new student outcomes (numbered as 1–7).15Notably, the seven new outcomes omit the phrase “life-long learning.” This motion represents asignificant time of reflection in engineering education: a time when reform to accreditationrequirements could dramatically change the way engineering is taught. Despite the potentialremoval of the phrase “life-long learning” from the prescribed outcomes, professional engineerswill still need to possess the characteristics of a life-long learner to be effective. To this end, ourfindings demonstrate several components of life-long learning that are currently being capturedby different engineering programs. Of these current components

Conference Session

Revitalization of Manufacturing Education

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ananda Mani Paudel, Metropolitan State University of Denver; Devi Kiran Kalla, Metropolitan State University of Denver

Tagged Divisions

Manufacturing

. Parametric solid modelling and surface modelling are the basic CAD technologies. Solid modelling creates a model that has the filled volume. It closely represents a physical object by having data of physical properties such as mass, density, along with the geometric information. Surface modelling, on the other hand, generates the outlook of the objects as a surface model but doesn’t reflect the physical properties as in a solid model. Solid modelling is preferred over surface modelling in AM as it has simpler representation of geometric information and provides information that is useful to generate tool path. 4. 3D scanning technology enables reverse engineering of a physical part

Conference Session

K-12 & Pre-College Engineering Division: Evaluation: Impact of Curriculum for PreK-12 Engineering Education

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Amy Trauth, University of Delaware; Jenni Buckley, University of Delaware; Manuela Restrepo Parra, The Perry Initiative

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Pre-College Engineering Education Division

variables such as gender, race, ethnicity, family’seducational background, and socioeconomic status. English et al. (2013) reported findings from a STEM-based lesson in whichstudents explored engineering concepts and principles pertaining to simple machines.The students clearly indicated how the machines were simulated by the materials. Thestudents were also able to reflect on different aspects of their design, especially onmaterial properties and how they affected stability. Allowing students to suggest ways toimprove their designs provided opportunities for further reflection in subsequent designprocesses. In general, students did not make explicit references to underlyingengineering and science principles, but they were able to link

Conference Session

Engineering Cultures and Identity

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Allison Godwin, Purdue University, West Lafayette

Tagged Topics

ASEE Diversity Committee

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

used with cautionand only adjust the model if they are consistent with theory. In this case, the wording ofQ8Eng_k and Q8Eng_l are very similar and these measurement items capture similarinformation about students’ competence beliefs; therefore, this modification was made and theresulting model better reflects the data implied matrix.Figure 2. Confirmatory factor analysis of the latent constructs of identity: interest (Int),recognition (Rec), and performance/competence (PC) beliefs for 2790 students in first-yearengineering at four U.S. institutions during the fall semester of 2015. All paths are significant atthe p < 0.001 level. Image generated using the semPlot package in R74,75.The confirmatory factor analysis indicates that the data do

Conference Session

Maker Spaces within the University

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Meredith Frances Penney, James Madison University; James Deverell Watkins; Bryan Levy, Georgia Institute of Technology; Julie S Linsey, Georgia Institute of Technology; Robert L. Nagel, James Madison University; Wendy C Newstetter, Georgia Institute of Technology; Kimberly Grau Talley P.E., Texas State University, San Marcos; Shaunna Fultz Smith, Texas State University, San Marcos

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

spaces; is it the same or different?Our studyThis research project is investigating three very different universities with engineering programsthat have embraced the maker culture: University B, University A, and University C. Each ofthe spaces are different, reflecting the differences in the institutions. University B is first andforemost a technological institute with the majority of undergraduates majoring in engineering.Its maker space, housed within the Department of Mechanical Engineering, is operated by a 70person team comprising of 65 undergraduate volunteers and 5 non-student members. The makerspace comprises five rooms totaling 2,500 square feet that includes a rapid prototyping suitewith six 3D printers having various material

Conference Session

Measuring Learning in Statics & Dynamics

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Nick Stites, Purdue University, West Lafayette; David A Evenhouse, Purdue University; Mariana Tafur-Arciniegas P.E., Purdue University, West Lafayette; Charles Morton Krousgrill, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Craig Zywicki, Purdue University; Angelika N Zissimopoulos, University of Chicago; David B Nelson, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Jennifer Deboer, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Jeffrey F Rhoads, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Edward J. Berger, Purdue University, West Lafayette

Tagged Divisions

Mechanics

Concept Inventory20. Additionally, the moderate correlation coefficientsbetween the inventory scores and exam scores fall in the range of values found in previouspublications comparing concept scores to problem-solving skills16. This fits with the observationthat much of the final grade and the exam scores reflect assessments of problem-solving ratherthan conceptual understanding. Overall, the expert selection of questions for the 11-questionsubset and the significant correlations between the aDCI scores and other assessment metricsprovide evidence that the aDCI is sufficiently valid for use in this study. Table 2. Spearman correlation coefficient (ρ) for aDCI scores and other performance metrics. aDCI Pre-Test

Conference Session

Emerging Computing and Information Technologies II

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Yujian Fu P.E., Alabama A&M University; Md Hossain Shuvo, Alabama A&M University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Computing & Information Technology

, demonstrate thecapability of mobile platform specially the Android platform which bear the testimony thatmobile platform can be made efficient in controlling robot.Preliminariesi. UMLUnified Modeling Language28 widely known as UML is a software engineering tool used formodeling software systems. Fundamentally it is used as a tool for analyzing, designing andimplementing software intensive systems. UML provides a visual representation of the systemwhich reflects the standard and interactive organization or system’s elements. From thebeginning till now, there are several versions of UML have been evolved and UML 2.0 is usedfor the modeling of our system. UML offers two types of system modeling, one is structural orstatic modeling which require the

Conference Session

Writing and Communication I

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Brad Jerald Henderson, University of California - Davis

Tagged Divisions

Liberal Education/Engineering & Society

paper’s style and structure also meld twodistinctive document types—technical report and narrative essay—in order to reflect upon asmall-scale, field-test type experiment and to identify initial positive or negative trends withinthe experience.Instructional ConceptThe development of a specialized grammar course for engineering and other STEM students waspredicated upon four assumptions. The first was that possessing a complete functionalunderstanding of how sentences work can help students to produce technical documents that areclear, concise, and correct; and second, that adequate grammatical skills are too often missing inengineering and STEM majors.Another assumption was that engineering and other STEM students already have mastery in

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session I

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

John R. Reisel, University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee; Cindy M Walker, University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee; Luciana Cancado, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee; Dian Mitrayani , University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

; this may suggest that students andfaculty have different ideas of what constitutes a critical thinking skill.(3) Faculty perceived students learning how to work independently as a much lower rate thanthe students themselves identified, likely reflecting what each group would consider to be“independent” work. Faculty also saw significantly less success by the students in learning howto conduct a research project (#6), which may indicate that the students are not fully sharing theirmentor’s vision of what is involved in conducting research at a high level. This is mirrored bybenefit #8, regarding a student’s research skills, which a much larger percentage of studentsthought was a benefit received in comparison to the percentage of faculty who

Conference Session

Dissecting the Nuances that Hinder Broad Participation in Engineering

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Brian A. Burt, Iowa State University; Alade S McKen, Iowa State University; Jordan Anthony Burkhart, Iowa State University; Jennifer Hormell, Iowa State University; Alec James Knight, Iowa State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Minorities in Engineering

other outcomes that resulted from offenses. Finally, the findings wereorganized into themes. Several steps were taken to ensure the quality of the findings. First, after thetranscriptions were produced, the audio recordings were checked against the transcripts to verifythe accuracy of the data. Second, transcripts were sent to participants to verify the accuracy ofcontent and meaning; no participants responded with changes to their transcriptions. Finally,because five researchers analyzed the data, and the five had various backgrounds andperspectives, the researchers reflected on their positionalities and subjectivities. This process ofbeing reflective helped them acknowledge who they were – and the biases they held – relative tothe

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 8

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Sergio Celis, Universidad de Chile; Isabel Hilliger, Pontificia Universidad Catholica de Chile

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

in the description of both cases—regardless of cultural and institutional differences—there are several common places between the two approaches to change presented in this paper(see Table 2 for a summary). There is a common motivation and goal, which is achievingexcellence in engineering education within the region and worldwide. Although each institutiondescribes its guideline principles in a different way, they all respond to the logic model suggestedby CORFO. Of note is that both leading engineering schools were aware of previous experiencesrelated to cultural change in engineering education and to the creation of university-basedentrepreneurship ecosystems. This awareness can be reflected in three major change strategiesconsidered from

Conference Session

CEED Paper Session 1: Using Co-Op and Internships to Improve Diversity, Retention, Learning, and Assessment

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Vedaraman Sriraman, Texas State University - San Marcos; Bobbi J. Spencer, Texas State University - San Marcos; Kimberly Grau Talley P.E., Texas State University - San Marcos; Araceli Martinez Ortiz, Texas State University - San Marcos

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Cooperative & Experiential Education

deemedundesirable by the IABs: 1) the program was offered only in the summer sessions; 2) it requiredconsiderable academic supervisor oversight; 3) the internship grade was mostly determined bythe academic supervisor; and, 4) as a writing intensive course, some of the program requirementswere consuming students’ working hours in a manner that was inefficient. Specifically, theinterns had been required to prepare daily logs that painstakingly described the details of workengagement by the hour and an equally tedious, descriptive account of reflections of the studentson those activities. The summer-based, five-week long regimen could not permit the industry toaccomplish much of substance with an intern. The department’s industrial partners also had todeal

Conference Session

First-Year Programs Division Technical Session 1: Using Technology and/or Technology Tools to Enhance Learning

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

John Matthew Long, Deakin University; Sivachandran Chandrasekaran P.E., Deakin University; Simon William Cavenett

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

student-student learning through online collaboration, where students and staff have interactive discussion forums, access to units, assessments items and engage with lecturers, tutors and other students.20 3. Reimagined learning experience through media-rich study materials and virtual learning environments.21 4. Providing modern tools (such as e-Portfolio) for storing, organizing, reflecting and sharing student learning with others.22 5. Online peer support, seminar groups and workshops to improve the students study skills.Deakin University students also have an opportunity to alternate and combine on-campus andonline education study modes into the undergraduate engineering program on a course-by-course

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Technical Session - Understanding and Changing Engineering Culture

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Omoju Miller, UC Berkeley

Tagged Topics

ASEE Diversity Committee, Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

the role of mentors inattracting underrepresented students, previously constructed instruments from 12 in theirattitudinal study of CS in the Level Playing Field’s Summer Math and Science Honors Academy(SMASH) were used. Additional instruments were developed by the researchers to measurecultural competency. The survey uses a 5-point Likert scale (where 1 = Not Really, 3 = Neutraland 5 = Absolutely).Along with the surveys, interviews were conducted to get a deeper sense of the effectiveness ofthe BJC curriculum in attracting historically underrepresented students. These audio-recordedinterviews were conducted at the university with participants that either attended CS10, CS61A,or both. Furthermore, participants were carefully chosen to reflect

Conference Session

K-12 & Pre-College Engineering Division: Addressing the NGSS: Supporting K12 Teachers in Engineering Pedagogy, Engineering Science, Careers, and Technical Pathways

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Julie Cafarella, University of Colorado - Boulder; Kevin O'Connor, University of Colorado - Boulder; Jacob (Jenna) McWilliams, University of Colorado - Boulder

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Pre-College Engineering Education Division

applicable to asignificant population of students and educators. Further, this case study is relevant toengineering education in that it centers around a classroom that is engaged in “application ofscientific knowledge to an engineering problem,” and NGSS frames this case study as anexample of its “vision of blending disciplinary core ideas, scientific and engineering practices,and crosscutting concepts.” Throughout this paper the authors examine and reflect on the purposes of science andengineering education as well as the ways in which large-scale science reforms (such as NGSS)attempt to address issues of access and equity that continue to persist in science and engineeringeducation. In future, the authors hope to analyze other NGSS case