. BrainHex: A neurobiological gamer typology survey. Entertainment computing, 5(1), pp.55-62.20. De Freitas, A.A. and de Freitas, M.M., 2013. Classroom Live: a software-assisted gamification tool. Computer Science Education, 23(2), pp.186-206.21. Featherstone, G., Aston, H. and Houghton, E., 2013. Game-based learning: Latest evidence and future directions. Slough: NFER.22. Deterding, S., Björk, S.L., Nacke, L.E., Dixon, D. and Lawley, E., 2013, April. Designing gamification: creating gameful and playful experiences. In CHI'13 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 3263-3266). ACM.23. Wang, Y. and Witten, I.H., 1996. Induction of model trees for predicting continuous classes (pp. 128-137
overall better results.References[1]Ural, A and Yost, J., Integration of Finite Element Modeling and Experimental Evaluation in a Freshman Project,Mid-Atlantic American Society for Engineering Education Conference, 2010.[2] Howard, E., Williams, R., and Gurganus, S.C., Using Additive Manufacturing and Finite Element Analysis in aDesign-Analyze-Build-Test Project, 122nd ASEE Annual Conference and Exhibition, Seattle, WA, USA., 2015.[3] ABAQUS, Student Edition, version 6.14-2, 2014, Simulia, Providence, RI.[4] HyperWorks by Altair Engineering.[5] http://www.abet.org/eac-criteria-2014-2015/[6] Thomson W. T. and M. D.Dahleh, Theory of vibration with applications, Upper Saddle River, N.J.: PrenticeHall, c1998.[7]Ilanko S. and Monterrubio L.E., The
low noise amplifier, 17-bit ADC and powerful DSP unit thus achieving high accuracy andresolution of the thermometer. The thermometer comes factory calibrated with a digital SMBusoutput giving full access to the measured temperature in the complete temperature range(s) witha resolution of 0.02°C. The user can configure the digital output to be PWM. As a standard, the10-bit PWM is configured to continuously transmit the measured temperature in range of -20°Cto 120°C, with an output resolution of 0.14°C. When NCTD measurements were compared tohigh end FLIR camera, the temperature differences were different. Therefore, the project teamdecided to use another infrared temperature sensor to determine if the measurements weredifferent because of the
. Issues Eng. Educ. Pract., 10.1061/(ASCE)EI.1943-5541.0000002, 58-63.5Gibson, G., Wang, Y., Cho, C., & Pappas, M. (2006). What Is Preproject Planning, Anyway? Journal ofManagement in Engineering, 22(1), 35–42. http://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0742-597X(2006)22:1(35)6 Schunk, D. H. (1991) Self-Efficacy and academic motivation, Educational Psychologist, 26:3-4, 207-231.7Sullivan, Howard, and Higgins, Norman. (1983). Teaching for Competency. Teachers College Press, New York,NY.8 Toor, S. and Ofori, G. (2008). Developing construction professionals of the 21st century: renewed vision forleadership. J. Prof. Issues Eng. Educ. Pract., 134:3(279), 279-286.8Wiggins, G. & McTighe. J. (2001) What is Backward Design? Understanding by Design. 1st
: Roy Kravitz;and, the Portland State University administration and faculty, for their continued partnership anddevelopment of high quality and innovative capstone products and experiences. Additionally, “Blocks ofCode” and the other capstone projects referenced in this paper were funded by Erebus Labs, with fundsused entirely for the physical components and fabrication of the end products.References[1] Blackley, S., & Howell, J. (2015). A STEM Narrative: 15 Years in the Making. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 40(7). http://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2015v40n7.8[2] Nadelson, L., Callahan, J., Pyke, P., Hay, A., & Schrader, C. (2010). Teaching Inquiry Based Stem In The Elementary Grades Using Manipulatives: A Systemic
, pages 335–344, 2012. [5] T. Carlson, W. Heirman, S. Eyerman, I. Hur, and L. Eeckhout. An evaluation of high-level mechanistic core models. ACM Transactions on Architecture and Code Optimization (TACO), 2014. [6] Doug Burger and Todd M. Austin. The simplescalar tool set, version 2.0. SIGARCH Comput. Archit. News, 25 (3):13–25, June 1997. [7] CACTI. Cacti: An integrated cache and memory access time, cycle time, area, leakage, and dynamic power model, 2008. URL http://www.hpl.hp.com/research/cacti/. http://www.hpl.hp.com/research/cacti/. [8] N. Agarwal, T. Krishna, L. Peh, and N.K. Jha. Garnet: A detailed on-chip network model inside a full-system simulator. In Performance Analysis of Systems and Software, 2009. ISPASS 2009
value,that of the application layer’s Instant Messenger application (used to create LL3P packets). Eachpacket has a unique identifier (2 bytes long), and a 1 byte Time To Live field which must bedecremented as the packet is forwarded through the network. The payload is variable sized and a1’s complement checksum is calculated over the packet using a method similar to IP’s method ofzeroing out the checksum field and placing the resulting checksum in the checksum field.Accordingly, when the TTL field changes the checksum must also change. LL3P Frame Structure Offset 0 1 2 3 4 5 Source LL3P 0x00
. Besterfield-Sacre, and Harvey Wolfe. "Using multisource assessment and feedback processes to develop entrepreneurial skills in engineering students." Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education Conference. 2003.6. Durfee, William K. "Engineering education gets real." Technology Review, 97 (1994): 42-42.7. Dahm, Kevin D., James A. Newell, and Heidi L. Newell. "Rubric development for assessment of undergraduate research: Evaluating multidisciplinary team projects." In CD) Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education Conference. 2003.8. Whitman, Lawrence E., Don E. Malzahn, Barbara S. Chaparro, Mark Russell, Rebecca Langrall, and Beth A. Mohler. "A Comparison of Group Processes
., & Camba, J. D. (2014), A Review of the Design Intent Concept in the Context of CAD Model Quality Metrics, Paper presented at 2014 ASEE Annual Conference, Indianapolis, Indiana. https://peer.asee.org/199925. Kirstukas, S. (2013). A Preliminary Scheme for Automated Grading and Instantaneous Feedback of 3D Solid Models, Proceedings of the Midyear Conference of the Engineering Design Graphics Division of ASEE, pp. 53- 58.6. Baxter, D., & Guerci, M. (2003). Automating an Introductory Computer Aided Design Course to Improve Student Evaluation, Paper presented at 2003 Annual Conference, Nashville, Tennessee. https://peer.asee.org/11479
. Since 1950-s, there was intensive international cooperation inthe area of training Vietnamese students in Soviet universities for industrial companies inVietnam. Training of students was accompanied by academic mobility of Soviet engineerswho contributed to the implementation of industrial projects in Vietnam.The decay of the Soviet Union resulted in drop in the number of joint projects in engineeringeducation. Vietnamese students also shifted their focus to other countries (such as the U.S.)offering a good system of engineering education. Russia is trying to progress in internationalcooperation with Vietnam and has almost returned its position in the number of students.Table 1 represents selected statistics of Russia, Vietnam and their
training sessions was not only to raise the level atwhich the teaching assistants use the workflow, but to also ensure they could accurately conductPre-CAM Consultations.Pre-CAM ConsultationsPrior to beginning formal work on a CAM project, students must consult with a member of theAFL staff. During the Pre-CAM Consultation, the staff member views the model(s) provided bythe student and discusses the manufacturing approach that will be used to machine the part. Thisincludes a discussion on the proper stock size, the proper fixturing approach, the order in whichprocesses should be applied, among other topics. The purpose behind this consultation is toprovide the student with a starting point to begin the CAM work. Also, it ensures they alsofollow
, Institute of Medicine. ISBN: 0-309-65442-4, (2007).2. G. Lichtenstein, H. G. Loshbaugh, B.Claar, H. L. Chen, , K. Jackson, S. D. Sheppard, “An EngineeringMajor Does Not (Necessarily) Make an Engineer: Career Decision Making Among Undergraduate EngineeringMajors,” Journal of Engineering Education, 98, 3, 227-234, (2009).3. National Science Board, Figure 2-11, Science and Engineering Indicators 2002. Arlington, Virginia:National Science Foundation, (NSB-02-1), 2002.4. National Science Board, Figure 2-17. Science and Engineering Indicators 2014. Arlington Virginia:National Science Foundation (NSB 14-01), 2014.5. National Science Board, Figure 2-18, Science and Engineering Indicators 2002. Arlington, Virginia:National Science
make a profit on this order and many orders to follow. (Sample just enough cards to make a confident well- informed decision and give the right answer)Bibliography 1) Kalpakjian, S., and Steven R. Schmid. "Chapter 4." Manufacturing Processes for Engineering Materials. 5th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 2008. Print. 2) Control Chart Constants and Formulae. Institute of Quality and Reliability, 2013. Web. 4 Mar. 2015. .Appendix: Homework assignment as given to students. ME323 – Spring 2015 Tell me by THIS FRIDAY… if you wish take the Bet! M. Schaefer Plan how you would
Warehouse Worker Hazards for Structural Steel Fabricating and Supply Companies,” American Society of Engineering Education26.488.2–26.488.8 (2015).[8] Brunette, M.J., “Development of Educational and Training Materials on Safety and Health: Targeting Hispanic Workers in the Construction Industry,” Family and Comunity Health 28(3), 253–266 (2005).[9] United States Department of Labor, “Women in the Construction Workplace: Providing Equitable Safety and Health Protection,” 1999, (2 October 2012).[10] Fox, S., and Livingston, G., “Latinos online: Hispanics with lower levels of education and English proficiency remain largely disconnected from the internet,” Pew Hispanic Center and Pew Internet Project1– 23 (2007
, especially in the field of Public Administration. Chairman of the Board of the GCC - Computer Graphics Center since 2005. Pr´o-Rector of University of Minho between 2006 and 2009. President of the National College of Informatics (Order of Engineers) since 2010.Prof. Victor F. A. Barros Ing.-Paed IGIP, Science and Education Research Council Prof. Victor Freitas de Azeredo Barros, Ing.-Paed IGIP is Executive Secretary of Science and Education Research Council. He is Researcher at AlgoritmiCentre/University of Minho; University of S˜ao Paulo; Mackenzie University; Pontifical Catholic University of Goias; Goi´as Federal Institute; Amap´a Federal Institute and Catarinense Federal Institute. He is Editor-in-Chief of the
. Gonzalez and R. E. Woods, Digital Image Processing. Upper Saddle River, NJ (USA): Prentice Hall, 3rd ed., 2008.[11] A. Daniels, Field Guide to Infrared Systems, Detectors, and FPAs. Bellingham WA (USA): SPIE Press, 2nd ed., 2010.[12] M. Bass, ed., Handbook of Optics, vol. I. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2nd ed., 1995.[13] G. C. Holst and T. S. Lomheim, CMOS/CCD Sensors and Camera Systems. Bellingham, WA (USA): SPIE Press, 2nd ed., 2011.[14] Idaho Power Company. Accessed 15 Feb 2016: https://www.idahopower.com/AboutUs/ EnergySources/FuelMix/typical_fuelMix.cfm. Appendix A Infrared (IR) Camera Introduction What is it
for the opportunity to be addressed. Describe the problem to be solved, objectives/goals, and assumptions. Design Process – Describe initial brainstorm options, selection criteria, refined options with detailed sketches/components, and selection of a built prototype. Always label (caption) any figures. As common practice, any figure in the report must be discussed somewhere in the text. Prototype Results – Include photographs of the device and testing. Show data to support or reject this design’s function. Description of Final Product – Include a comprehensive schematic(s) of your final design. Include details of all components. Be logical in your sequence of this section. Conclusion – Summarize
) undergraduate education. Board of Science Education, National Research Council, The National Academies, Washington, DC.5. Feisel, L. D., & Rosa, A. J. (2005). The role of the laboratory in undergraduate engineering education. Journal of Engineering Education, 94(1), 121-130.6. Raines, J. M. (2012). FirstSTEP: A preliminary review of the effects of a summer bridge program on pre- college STEM majors. Journal of STEM Education: Innovations and Research, 13(1), 22.7. Felder, R. M., Woods, D. R., Stice, J. E., & Rugarcia, A. (2000). The future of engineering education II. Teaching methods that work. Chemical Engineering Education, 34(1), 26-39.8. Ritchie, S. M., & Rigano, D. L. (1996). Laboratory apprenticeship through a student
.4. Shuman, L.J., Besterfield-Sacre, M., and Mcgourty, J. (2005). The ABET “Professional Skills” – Can They Be Taught? Can They Be Assessed? Journal of Engineering Education, 41-55.5. Hanus, J., and Russell, J.S. (2007). Integrating The Development Of Teamwork, Diversity, Leadership, And Communication Skills Into A Capstone Design Course. In ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition. (Honolulu, HI, American Society for Engineering Education.6. Howe, S., and Wilbarger, J. (2006). 2005 National survey of engineering capstone design courses. In American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition, ASEE, ed. (Chicago, IL, ASEE), pp 5-10.7. Bayless, D.J., and Robe, T.R. (2010
Engineering Programs. Paperpresented at the 2006 Annual Conference & Exposition.2. Chesler, N.C. & Chesler, M.A. (2002). Gender-informed mentoring strategies for women engineering scholars:On establishing a caring community. Journal of Engineering Education, 91. 49-55.3. Darwin, A., & Palmer, E. (2009). Mentoring circles in higher education. Higher Education Research andDevelopment, 28, 125-136.4. Kram, K.E., & Isabella, L.A. (1985). Mentoring alternatives: The role of peer relationships in careerdevelopment. Academy of Management Journal, 28, 110-132.5. Bhatia, S., Asce, M. & Amati, J. P. (2010). “If these women can do it, I can do it too”: Building womenengineering leaders through graduate peer mentoring. Leadership &
students in engineering disciplines.With a four year graduation rate exceeding that of Non-Bridge African American students in 2010,the efforts of the Bridge program are viewed favorably. The MSU Bridge program remains diligentin utilizing the best practices shared in this paper to continue to improve URM student outcomes.References[1] Reisel, J. R. (2012). Assessment of Factors Impacting Success for Incoming College Engineering Students in a Summer Bridge Program. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, Volume 43 Issue 4, 421-433.[2] Booth Womack, V., Dickerson, D., Solis, F., Stawlley, C. S., & Zephirin, T. (2014, June 15). Can an Engineering Summer Bridge Program Effectively
that serves all the LOBs(Line Of Businesses) and Channels in the organization, 3) increased sales revenues because ofmore cross sell and up sell Opportunities, 4) lower TCO (Total Cost of Ownership) because oflesser maintenance costs as the existing SOR s will slowly retire, 5) increased customersatisfaction and retention, 6) consolidated data enables rapid sales and marketing turnaroundtimes, 7) fast performing SOA web services resulting in increased productivity, 8) analyze theconsumer pattern analysis through intelligent analytics, 9) ability to monitor the applicationhealth through intelligent and real-time monitoring dashboards, and 10) enhanced applicationmaintenance and scalable, reliable catering to future needs [10]. The other
strategies. In the developed economies, researchers such as ClaytonChristensen have been delivering workshops that are rooted in research-based strategies.ApproachCompetencies can be seen as inclusion of skills, knowledge and attitudes including the patternsof personal competencies and the way they work together for achievement 11. We adoptedRichard Lyons‘ definition of innovation - fresh thinking that creates value for all thestakeholders12 - for developing our framework. This includes two elements – fresh thinking orcreativity and value delivery. Fresh thinking results in generating a number of quality ideas andchoosing the best idea(s) and value delivery entails, developing solutions and deploying them toensure benefit to the stakeholders. Our
an established microfluidic technology. Lab on a Chip, 2014. 14(17): p. 3241-3247.5. Wu, J., X. Wu, and F. Lin, Recent developments in microfluidics-based chemotaxis studies. Lab on a Chip, 2013. 13(13): p. 2484-2499.6. Zheng, G., et al., An integrated microfluidic device in marine microalgae screening application. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 2013. 72(1): p. 231-243.7. Mazutis, L., et al., Single-cell analysis and sorting using droplet-based microfluidics. Nature Protocols, 2013. 8(5): p. 870-891.8. Teh, S., et al., Droplet microfluidics. Lab on a Chip, 2008. 8(2): p. 198-220.
practice of teaching these twotopics in an integrated manner. In fact, the faculty already integrated Statics with Strengths ofMaterials and is exploring the possibility of integrating other topics such as Dynamics andVibrations.1 Daisie Boettner, Blace Albert, and Bret Van Poppel. "A Proposal For An Integrated Mechanical EngineeringCurriculum At The United States Military Academy". 2003 Annual Conference, Nashville, Tennessee, 2003, June.ASEE Conferences, 2003. https://peer.asee.org/11426 Internet. 24 Sep, 20152 Boettner, D. D., Norberg, S. A., Melnyk, R. V., Highley, J. L., Rounds, M. J., & Arnas, A. O. (2006, January).Teaching the Fundamentals of Thermodynamics and Fluid Mechanics through an Integrated Systems Approach.In ASME 2006
Undergraduate Students in Engineering through Freshman Courses, ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Montreal, Quebec.2. Johnson, J., & Niemi, A. D. (2015). A First-year Attrition Survey: Why Do They Say They Are Still Leaving? ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Seattle, Washington.3. Meyer, M. & Marx, S., (2014). “Engineering dropouts: A qualitative examination of why undergraduates leave engineering”, Journal of engineering education, Vol. 103, Issue 4, Pages 525-548, October 20144. Skurla, C., Thomas, B., & Bradley, W., (2004). Teaching Freshman Using Design Projects and Laboratory Exercises to Increase Retention, ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Salt Lake City, UT.5. Hall, D., et al., (2008). “Living with the Lab
to persist among African American and White first-year college students. Research in Higher Education, 48(7), 803–839.14. Wilson, D., Bell, P., Jones, D., Spring, D., & Hansen, L. (2010). Cross sectional study of belonging in engineering education. International Journal of Engineering Education, 26(3), 1–12.15. Ohland, M. W., Sheppard, S. D., Lichtenstein, G., Eris, O., Chachra, D., & Layton, R. A. (2008). Persistence, engagement and migration in engineering programs. Journal of Engineering Education, 97(3), 259–278.16. Floyd-Smith, T., Wilson, D., Campbell, R., Veilleux, N., Bates, R., Plett, M., Scott, E., & Peter, D. (2010). A multi-institutional study of connection, community, and engagement in STEM education
Annual Conference8. Garrison, R. & Vaughan N. (2008). Blended learning in higher education. Jossey-Bass.9. Olbina, S. (2008). Improving the Delivery System for Teaching the Project Planning and Feasibility/SiteDevelopment Course to Building Construction Undergraduate Students and Real Estate Graduate Students.International Journal of Construction Education and Research, 4 (1), 46-6410. Quality Assurance for Blended and Online Courses. (2016). [QOLT Materials Request Form]. Retrieved fromhttps://docs.google.com/forms/d/1NkWmm4j_TfKydeXOU6yaqobkkzTjI83n_E7RS4fveo4/viewform11. Richardson, J., & Swan, K. (2003). Examining Social Presence in Online Courses in Relation to Students’Perceived Learning and Satisfaction. Journal of Asynchronous
%) reported that they intend toattend college. Of those intending to attend college, (57%) plan to major in a STEM discipline.Following the camp, students were asked about their academic interests. Student participantsreported their degree of interest in Language Arts, Social Studies, Mathematics, and Science on a6‐point Likert scale (1 = Not Interested at All, 6 = Very Interested). The student participantswere most interested in Science (M = 5.43, SD = 1.03), followed by Mathematics (M = 4.38, SD= 1.56), Social Studies (M = 4.09, SD = 1.68), and Language Arts (M = 2.86, S = 1.42).When trying to look at motivation of students to participate in STEM disciplines, the internalevaluation team developed instrumentation to measure the impact of project
active role in demonstrating that they personallyhave achieved the degree program’s SLOs through the completion of work as demonstrated in anindividual student learning portfolio. The student constructs their own portfolio as s/heprogresses through the program relying, in large part, on evaluated/graded assignments carefullymapped to outcomes. The final, graduation-level portfolios are a mandatory requirement fordegree completion. Portfolios have been used by the program for approximately ten years andfor multiple ABET visits. Faculty and members of the department’s external advisory boardhave traditionally evaluated the graduation portfolios. As the department’s enrollment anddegree production has grown significantly, portfolios have evolved to