Waterloo. Ada’s research and teaching interests include decision making under uncertainty, subjective probability, gender issues in STEM disciplines, design teaching, experiential and online learning, team processes, and peer review.Mehrnaz Mostafapour, University of WaterlooDr. Rania Al-Hammoud P.Eng., University of Waterloo Dr. Al-Hammoud is a Faculty lecturer (Graduate Attributes) in the department of civil and environmental engineering at the University of Waterloo. Dr. Al-Hammoud has a passion for teaching where she con- tinuously seeks new technologies to involve students in their learning process. She is actively involved in the Ideas Clinic, a major experiential learning initiative at the University of Waterloo. She
level. For twosemesters, the Microprocessors course at East Carolina University (ECU) has been taught in aflipped classroom format allowing students to watch online lectures before attending each lectureperiod and to allow students more opportunities to ask questions and complete learning activitiesin class. During the scheduled lecture period students are encouraged to work with each other tocomplete hands-on in-class exercises allowing them to evaluate their understanding of thematerial presented in the online lecture and the assigned reading. Such in-class exercises mayinvolve answering conceptual questions, writing code, or building circuits. It was observed bythe instructor in previous semesters that some students who had a good grasp of
, defined as the knowledge and regulation of one’s own cognitive processes, iscritically important to student learning and particularly instrumental in problem-solving. Despitethe importance of metacognition, much of the research has occurred in controlled researchsettings such that much less is known about how to help students develop metacognitive skills inclassroom settings. Further, there are significant bodies of research on the role of metacognitionin writing and solving math problems, but little work has been done on the role of metacognitionwithin engineering disciplines. As part of a larger project to generate transferable tools that canbe used to teach and evaluate undergraduate engineering students’ metacognitive skills, we aredeveloping
theseperceptions changed after STEP. Data were collected using open-ended entrance surveys andwritten responses on final exams. Research protocols were approved by the Institutional ReviewBoard (#13-577).Context and ParticipantsThe research setting was an introductory engineering course embedded within STEP. The courseis designed to introduce students to fundamental engineering concepts, and course objectivesincluded engagement with the engineering design process, exploration of engineering disciplines,engineering ethics, technical writing, and problem solving with software tools (Matlab). Thecourse curriculum integrated problem-based learning and product archaeology frameworks(Barrows, 1986; Kolmos, De Graaff, Johri, & Olds, 2014; Lewis et al., 2011
visiting assistant professor at a research one land grant university heforecasted that he would be introduced to many of the same hurdles as proposed byBrent and Felder (1998): Writing proposals and trying to get them funded, attracting and learning how to deal with graduate students, and having to churn out a large number of refereed 2 papers while you were still trying to figure out how to do research. You may remember the incredibly time consuming labor of planning and teaching new courses and the headaches of dealing with bored classes and poor student performance and possibly cheating and poor ratings and a host of other problems you never thought about when
level of interest incontinuing on to graduate/professional school (Lopatto, 2004, 2007; Massi et al., 2011), andare more likely to enroll in graduate/professional school compared to non-participants(Hathaway, Nagda, & Gregerman, 2002). REU participants from underrepresented groups aremore likely to be attracted to academic careers in the computing professoriate if they gainexperience collaborating with their peers and mentors, learn about social impacts related tocareers in computing research, understand the graduate admissions process, and familiarizethemselves with graduate student life (Tamer & Stout, 2016).High quality faculty-student mentor interactions are characterized by faculty preparation forthe arrival of the student
university. In total, the annual budgetis approximately $6,500, for a program that affects upward of 20 faculty and academic staff annually. 3Faculty participants see more benefits; for example, there are (independent of the NFLC) modest start-up packages that new faculty access through an internal grant process. The start-up packages are opento all new faculty, but those who attend the NFLC programming are able to share and refine their ideasin the space afforded by the community. In short, it behooves a new faculty member to attend thesemeetings so they can write a stronger proposal.Faculty are also introduced to best practices for retaining URMs and scholarship in that area throughcollaboration
that thesense of belonging in women students is consistently higher in departments where they arerepresented in higher numbers9. At Arizona State University, the long-term effects to a suite ofstrategies designed to increase sense of belonging were found to be an increase in retention from0.9% per year to 1.6% per year in their undergraduate engineering cohorts from 1998 to 201310.Four areas were identified at the University of Washington as being important to thedevelopment of community and belonging of ethnic minority students: co-curricular activities,peer support, faculty/department support, and residence programs. They found that supportmechanisms changed with time and responsive strategies should reflect that11. Sophomore andjunior level
. Activitiesof the program included: pre-test and post-test to gauge knowledge and interest; field trips todemonstrate green energy; professional STEM presenters; ArcGIS® software training todemonstrate geographical constraints. Field trips associated with the program included visits tothe Iowa Flood Center, to Iowa Hydraulics Modules and to the Kirkwood Community CollegeWind Turbine. The students worked in pairs and had to answer the question: Which geographicalfactors are most important when placing a wind turbine? Students presented the results of theirmapping exercise to their peers and mentors. Comparison of pre and post STEM interest surveyswere used to reveal the program impact, and provided guidance for further improvement of theprogram.17
past thirty years, many studies have emphasized the importance of applying ergonomicprinciples to product designs such as designing swimming suits3, non-powered hand tools4,writing instruments for children5, and luggage handles6. Thus, continuously injecting humanfactors and ergonomic (HFE) design concepts in the undergraduate engineering curriculum isimportant. It ensures that students have knowledge of applying HFE principles towards productdesign to minimize potential causes of injury and discomfort for the users7.Studies have noted that product design should address ergonomic considerations that take intoaccount the majority of customers’ capabilities and limitations when using the produce for itsintended purpose8. To discover the
experiments orzip-lining with ecology experiments. Mentoring and peer networking opportunities for studentsinclude: (1) positive and encouraging interactions with faculty members who specialize invarious STEM fields, (2) informal interactions with college-age STEM students, and (3) buildingpeer relationships with other students with similar interests.Table 1. Example of a Weekday schedule for program 8:00 AM Breakfast 9:00 AM 10:00 AM Canoe Design Project 11:00 AM 12:00 Lunch PM 1:00 PM Class 1: Civil Engineering 2:00 PM 3:00 PM Class 2: Electrical Engineering 4:00 PM 5:00 PM Dinner 6:00 PM Guest Speaker: Physician 7:00 PM
(Dym et al. 2005). At the start of the semester, students self-assemble into teams of 4-5,and each team chooses a lower-income country to explore. Over 14 weeks, teams use their chosencountry as a starting point to work through a cycle of biomedical device design, including broadscoping and needs assessment, problem definition, concept generation and iteration, CADprototyping, and design iteration based on peer, student instructor, and faculty feedback (see Table1). They also examine case studies of (successful and unsuccessful) biomedical device design,learn about healthcare innovation systems, and reflect on key challenges and best practices forbiomedical engineering design.Over 3 consecutive semesters, our students have developed a variety
) a single college or university within a country or an academic discipline.As our understanding of impactful learning evolves, many instructors are drawn to explorealternative pedagogies such as flipped classrooms, hands-on exploration, problem-based andproject-based approaches, case studies, peer instruction, and more. These and other activepedagogies can improve engineering student learning [2]. Effectively deploying any of theseapproaches entails a shift in curricular culture. Roles, activities, expectations, and artifactschange from one pedagogical approach to another, and so the underlying assumptions facultymembers make about teaching and learning must change as well.Faculty members undertaking such pedagogical modifications sometimes
associations were used as thebasis for sending survey solicitations, including: members of the American Society forEngineering Education (ASEE) ethics, community engagement, liberal education/engineering &society, and educational research & methods divisions; authors of papers from peer-reviewedjournals and the ASEE conference with ‘ethics’ as a keyword, principle investigators of NSFfunded grants related to ethics; faculty advisors for student professional, honors and servicesocieties (e.g., Society for Women Engineers, the American Society of Civil Engineers, TauBeta Pi, Engineers Without Borders); and faculty mentors of NSF funded Research Experiencefor Undergraduate sites.In total there were 1448 responses combined from both the curricular
. Our community college partnersmay accept students into their schools even if the student is not skills proficient inreading and/or writing and/or math; these students then take remedial or developmentalcourses so that they can become skills proficient in reading and/or writing and/or math.At the senior college, all of the students who enter into the school of engineering asfreshmen are skills proficient. Once a student is accepted into the school of engineering,s/he is classified as an engineering major and once s/he begins as a first-time, full-timestudent, the student is part of the cohort that is tracked and reported for retention andgraduation data analysis.In order for information to be consistent, the cohort of students in a program has
infrastructure • introduces each of the subdiscipline areas of civil and environmental engineering (transportation, environmental, construction, structural, and geotechnical), and • develops professional skills (e.g. report writing, oral communication, teamwork).This course is required of all CEE majors and is one of the first courses taken once studentsmatriculate into CEE programs from General Engineering, typically in their second year. Thecourse is one of three fundamentals courses (along with Surveying and Computer Applications)that students take before advancing to first courses in each of the CEE subdisciplines. Fivesections, with approximate enrollments of 30 students each, are offered each academic year in athree lecture hour
werefound in the frequency that some ethical topics were taught among individuals in differentdisciplines, as summarized in Table 4. Overall, civil engineering capstone design instructorsreported a higher number of ethics topics as compared to peers in electrical or mechanicalengineering. This may indicate a greater overall focus on ethics in civil engineering capstonedesign courses.Table 4. Percentage of senior capstone design instructors who teach different ethics topics Ethics-Related Topic Civil Mechanical Electrical Chi test p value Sustainability 78 43 35 <0.0001 Ethical failures/disaster 73 51 41 0.01
Cu complexsolution showed 2.419 (+/- 0.053) weight percent of Cu in the liquid solution when tested by theXRF analyzer. These results suggest that upon curing a greater amount of Cu metal is impartedto the polymer film and may be unevenly distributed throughout its 1.0 mm thickness within the1 cm diameter area of analysis. Figure 2 in the presented poster is an optical photograph of theelectrochemical test cell set-up configured to date. As of the writing of this REU report,electrochemical test results are pending.Mechanical Results - The Instron 2716-020 used for tensile testing and to estimate the modulusof elasticity was not sensitive enough to measure the strength of these films. Unistrut scaffoldingwas employed to fix the polymer films
understanding. He is a co- developer of the Reformed Teaching Observation Protocol (RTOP) and his work has been cited more than 1800 times and his publications have been published in multiple peer-reviewed journals such as Science Education and the Journal of Research in Science Teaching. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Paper ID #18739Prof. Robert J. Culbertson, Arizona State University, Department of Physics Robert J. Culbertson is an Associate Professor of Physics. Currently, he teaches introductory mechanics and electrodynamics for physics majors and a course in musical acoustics
) hension) hension) Non-SLA Few pictures, Multiple Students begin Students given Open-ended Based topics not well choice reading/writing challenging engineering Strategies explained. questions but programs to problems to project used Limited self- no simple solve synthetize to challenge testing about programs. engineering learning. understand- questions in Facebook problems. ing and screencasts. used, but no expand group
learner.Constructivist theory assumes that knowledge is constructed by learners as attempts to make senseof experiences.The role of teachers, as per Driscoll [16] is to allow learners to test their own understandingsagainst those of teachers or more advanced peers. The learner’s sense of their environment andtheir experiences must have some limits. The limits are constructed in the form of suggestions andguidelines from teachers and more advanced peers.Method in Teaching Design and Drafting Course (EGT212) Using Modified ConstructivistApproach 1. Start with the construct and drive at the theory (for example, a project comprising the design of a component, depicting one cross section): Step 1: Identify the Course: EGT212 – Computer Aided Design
the use of verified data. error, testing hypothesis, data troubleshooting Interest coming directly Discussion of student's Interest from outside the from the student, desire toStudent interest in subject matter individual like from know more about subject,Interest of research or research family, friends, or also includes expression of itself mentors/peers
activities.Recruitment processThe recruitment is mainly done through the STI program director’s annual letter on announcingSTI Program to the guidance counselors of the feeder high schools. This is done in the first weekof March. Additionally, it is also informed through the local science fairs such as Miami ValleyScience and Engineering Fair-West District Science Day and Dayton TechFest, and through theCSU students and the STI alumni who may know suitable applicants among their peers andjuniors in their high schools.The letter to the high school counselors summarizes the requirements and the details of thescholarships. The typical scholarship package includes tuition, workshops and handouts, roomand board, facility usage, equipment and supplies, travel (field
for at least two ABET 6-year evaluationcycles. The primary focus of this paper is on accreditation of computer science, but issues fromsoftware engineering accreditation will also be taken into consideration where appropriate.Nationally there are a large number of computer science and software engineering degree pro-grams that are ABET accredited. As of this writing, there are 287 four-year degree programs incomputer science that are accredited by ABET in the United States [1]. For software engineer-ing, there are 26 such programs [1].It is difficult to obtain a precise national estimate of the percentage of computer science programsthat are accredited compared to those that are not. In the state of California, in which our owninstitution
common freshman year focusing on the profession,preparatory skills and retention. A new innovation is the Chemistry for Engineers course, ascience course concerned with topics for professional development. GenEd is the University corerequirement which satisfies the social sciences and humanities requirement. First Semester Second Semester Calculus I Calculus II Chemistry for Engineers, Chemistry Lab Elementary Classical Physics I Introduction to Engineering Engineering Graphics GenEd Analytical Reading and Writing Computer Programming and Analysis
. While this course uses active learning approaches and team projects, the scope of theircontents distinguish them from similar courses that seek to achieve improved graduation andretention rates. For instance, in this course, soft skills such as technical writing, use of Excel,developing an individual academic plan of study, cooperative education, internships, culturaldiversity, quality, safety, and ethics are covered. Basic technical skills covered include math,mechanical, electrical, and computer engineering technology. The rationale for this course is toexpose students to these subjects and topics before they enroll in core engineering technologycourses such as applied statics.Assessment of learning:While the author plans to conduct this
alsoeducated about careers that require this skill set and were introduced to a programminglanguage called “Processing”. We observed that students showed increased enthusiasmtowards CS. In addition, we noticed that the group activity component of the classesencouraged sociability and idea synthesis among peers. This CS community outreachprogram motivated us to extend the effort to teach science concepts using the Processinglanguage. This may potentially promote sociability, creativity, and empowerment inSTEM among middle school students. Specifically, we plan to use the Processingprogramming language to facilitate learning of biological and chemical concepts, sincesuch concepts can be difficult for students to visualize from a textbook. This
theirassignment but are encouraged to explore and ask questions. Students are tasked to complete theprogram so the user can draw with at least 5 different paintbrush sizes (either square or circular)in 5 different colors. Students then draw any school appropriate picture and submit their codeand drawing as the assignment. Examples from four different students from last semester areshown in the collage below: Figure 2: Collection of student images drawn from their own Microsoft Paint Clone program written in C++ and MATLAB. Speed Gait This lab activity is different from the others in that students don’t explicitly write code;instead they
design has been used by the research teams to enhance other laboratory courses inmechanical engineering [1]. Duis et al. used a similar approach to modify laboratory curriculumin chemistry [3]. The technique has been used more widely in traditional classrooms [4]–[7]. Inthis project we used backward design to build student skills in professional development andtechnical areas. We used a list of learning outcomes developed by Kuh [8] that employersconsider essential, specifically: Self-direction, timeliness, cogent writing, critical thinking,adaptability, quantitative reasoning, social responsibility, teamwork and collaboration.Active learning is a pedagogical method to engage students more directly in learning, typicallyusing small groups and
editorial boards for 7 interna- tional journals, and served as the Chair and Co-Chair for 12 international conferences. For recognition of my research activities, I have been invited to a number of international conferences as Invited Speaker, chaired panel discussions and numerous international conference sessions. I have served on more than 200 international conference program committees. Furthermore, I have published number of articles in peer- reviewed international journals and conferences. I am also an active member of ACM, ASEE, ASEE/PSW and CSAB.Dr. Abdulbaset Abdulaziz Gaddah A.G., University of Umm Al-Qura Dr. Abdulbaset Gaddah is currently an assistant professor in Computer Science at the University of Umm