solution iteration earlier in their undergraduate career, advancing their capacityto make independent decisions. Integrating courses into a single project illustrates the necessity ofunderstanding and combining a wide variety of concepts to effectively arrive at comprehensivesolutions. Thus, it is expected that efforts to increase the education potential of students in theirsecond year will significantly improve their performance in designing and delivering theircapstone project in their final year of study.The IDP used to integrate these courses was a stir stick bridge design and construction groupproject. The IDP involved students in designing, analyzing and constructing a bridge made ofwood or plastic stir sticks, subject to requirements, which
at our university. All members of the team volunteered to be part of an initiative that,while perceived as important to the development of well-rounded engineers, would nonethelessbe considered by most to provide limited opportunities for career advancement and recognition.The efforts of the group aligned with the paid duties of only some of the team members. Someindividual goals – for example reducing team conflicts that an instructor with a project-heavyteaching assignment will need to handle, or increasing the number of publications in the area ofresearch in engineering education – tended to be recognized after joining the team rather thanbeing a motivation for initially joining. In addition, none of the team members came to the tablewith
to ARL’s Vehicle Technology Directorate from West Point he has continued his research on unmanned systems under ARL’s Campaign for Maneuver as the Associate Director of Special Programs. Throughout his career he has continued to teach at a variety of colleges and universities. For the last 4 years he has been a part time instructor and collaborator with researchers at the University of Maryland Baltimore County (http://me.umbc.edu/directory/). He is currently an Assistant Professor at York College PA.Dr. Jason Forsyth, York College of Pennsylvania Jason Forsyth is an Assistant Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering at York College of Penn- sylvania. He received his PhD from Virginia Tech in May 2015. His
creative critical ideas to develop. Wemaintained rigorous expectations for students while demanding the out of the box thinking thatinnovations require. Developing comfort with discomfort, working collaboratively with peoplefrom other disciplines, and attaining agency through their individual talents and skills were allarenas where we saw significant student growth, particularly articulated in the Final Projectpresentations. Students also expressed gratification at the opportunity to work acrossdisciplines, learn from each other, and even share strengths with each other. For many it wasthe only class that held space for that experience in their University career. While timeconsuming to plan, the rewards for students and faculty are worthwhile
they might actuallysolve in their professional careers. As one student stated: “It provided a realistic scenario similar to a problem which could be encountered on the job.”Other students explained how the real world example helped them “to learn the material better”: “By working on a real life problem with [company name] Superchargers, it allowed me to see real world problems and how we can solve them with dynamics.”One student stated that the experience helped them to value what they are learning in class: “It was nice to get a taste of what real world problems are like. Because it helps me see the value of what I am, or should be learning.”Open-endednessStudents expressed both excitement and frustration
? d. They also give an example of how “a fluid pressure of 1,000 psi can push with 3140 lbs. of force. A pneumatic cylinder using 100 psi air would need a bore of almost 6½ in. (33 sq. in.) to develop the same force.” How is this so? e. Go to the “Education & Careers” section on the website. Under the “Employment” section review the companies listed where career opportunities exist. Pick three companies and describe how they may use pneumatics.A second analytical computational assignment is being developed to help expand a student'sknowledge of pressurized air and transitioning from ideal gas operational ranges to non-ideal gaspressure ranges and how those two ranges can impact
, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Dr. Brent K. Jesiek is an Associate Professor in the Schools of Engineering Education and Electrical and Computer Engineering at Purdue University. He also leads the Global Engineering Education Collabora- tory (GEEC) research group, and is the recipient of an NSF CAREER award to study boundary-spanning roles and competencies among early career engineers. He holds a B.S. in Electrical Engineering from Michigan Tech and M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in Science and Technology Studies (STS) from Virginia Tech. Dr. Jesiek draws on expertise from engineering, computing, and the social sciences to advance under- standing of geographic, disciplinary, and historical variations in engineering
of New Mexico, Drake State Technical College, and Chandler-Gilbert Community College. The award focused on expanding outreach activities to increase the awareness of potential college stu- dents about career opportunities in electronics technologies. Dr. Alaraje is a member of the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE), a member of the ASEE Electrical and Computer Engineer- ing Division, a member of the ASEE Engineering Technology Division, a senior member of the Institute of Electrical & Electronic Engineers (IEEE), and a member of the Electrical and Computer Engineering Technology Department Heads Association (ECETDHA).Mr. Mark Highum, Bay de Noc Community College Mark Highum is currently the
Tucker, Tucker Innovations Dr. Tommy Tucker is the CEO and owner of Tucker Innovations. He has a Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineer- ing from the Georgia Institute of Technology. He has over 15 years of experience writing computationally intensive software applications for engineering, medical, and defense applications. After spending the early part of his career at high tech start-up companies, Dr. Tucker founded Tucker Innovations to fa- cilitate his software consulting activities. Through Tucker Innovations, Dr. Tucker has aided various organizations in producing software applications from concept to product launch and continuing through multiple release cycles. Clients range from small high tech startup companies to
undertaken to support the current campus operations and research at the UMES toreduce its carbon footprint. The first phase, led by a multidisciplinary team of university faculty,career scientists, staff, and supported by students, saw the implementation of a year-roundbiodiesel generation capability [7]. The project’s rationale stemmed from the institution’s sizeableagricultural operations (UMES is an 1890 land grant institution) which were undertaken by heavymachinery operating on copious amounts of traditional diesel fuel (Figure 1). Biodiesel, on theother hand, is a renewable alternative which can be produced by virgin oils extracted from oilseeds, or used oils, such as the waste oils from the university’s cafeteria. Through the process
curricular content makes a difference in shaping the beliefs and expectationsstudents hold as they transition into their professional careers. Such an assumption is warrantedgiven the way other topics appear in the curriculum. For example, if an emphasis on teamworkand problem-solving were not perceived as relevant to professional practice, then one would notexpect them to receive as much attention as they do4,5. Similarly, engineering ethics is anothersuch pivotal topic, and therefore one would expect it to appear in undergraduate courses. Yet,this is not uniformly the case. To understand the discrepancy in engineering ethics coverage, thiswork focuses on some of the central actors in course content decisions – engineering departmentfaculty members
conceptual change and situated cognition. He received the NSF CAREER award in 2010 and is working on a study to characterize prac- ticing engineers’ understandings of core engineering concepts. He is a Senior Associate Editor for the Journal of Engineering Education.Dr. Kathleen Quardokus Fisher, Florida International University Dr. Kathleen Quardokus Fisher is an assistant professor at Florida International University. Her research interests focus on understanding how organizational change occurs in higher education with respect to teaching and learning in STEM courses.Mr. Sean Lyle Gestson, Oregon State University Sean Gestson is a recent graduate from the University of Portland where he studied Civil Engineering
results. Section 5 is a discussion ofconclusions and future steps to address issues encountered in the assessment.2. BackgroundWe describe instructional strategies and infrastructure that focus on wireless communicationssystems and enable development and evaluation of educational modules designed to makecomplex topics more accessible throughout academic and professional careers of STEM workers.These learning experiences are intended to be immersive, and include game-like, visuallyengaging tutorial exercises as well as asynchronous exercises in which participants program orconfigure autonomous radios and systems.GamificationOne of the major hurdles to overcome in the education process is in teaching the computationalprocesses involved in SDR
. His research interests include Humanitarian Engineering, social justice in engineering education, global engineering education, professional engineering practice, and curriculum design.Prof. Brent K. Jesiek, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Dr. Brent K. Jesiek is an Associate Professor in the Schools of Engineering Education and Electrical and Computer Engineering at Purdue University. He also leads the Global Engineering Education Collabora- tory (GEEC) research group, and is the recipient of an NSF CAREER award to study boundary-spanning roles and competencies among early career engineers. He holds a B.S. in Electrical Engineering from Michigan Tech and M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in Science
(e.g., TexasA&M University, University of Georgia, and University of Florida). The overarching goal of forming STEM education focused programs across the UScampuses is to enhance the quality of the college students’ STEM learning experiences andattract diverse student populations to choose STEM as their careers. For this purpose, the STEMfaculty, who are the major actors in the students’ learning experiences, play a central role. It is critical to ensure that STEM education faculty in general and engineering educationfaculty in particular in the university levels are well informed about the evidence-basedpedagogies. Evidence-based pedagogies are often the ones that are student-centered and learner-oriented. An essay
thedevelopment goals. Also, the need to support multiple platforms (iOS, Android, web) is a realisticchallenge that exposes students to tradeoff decisions that they will face in their future careers assoftware engineers. Close interaction with the transit system helped the students see how thesoftware is used and helped us better define the SPL assets as they were developed.4.2 Product ArchitectureThe product we developed for the transit systemconsists of several components and is designed tobe easy to update for the transit system. Riders ofthe busses can use the Transit Application (TA)with or without an internet connection. The TA isdeployed natively for Android and iOS and includesdatabase on the mobile device for offlinefunctionality. A screenshot
to bring more faculty andstudents together to develop novel therapeutics that can be translated to the clinic. To trainstudents on current methods and research in drug delivery for academic or industrial careers, wehave developed a new course on drug delivery systems (DDS) for juniors, seniors and graduatestudents at the University of Pennsylvania.The course is taught by engineering and medical school faculty for students in engineering,chemistry, pharmacology and other biomedical science programs. The students enrolled in theclass reflect the range of expertise of engineers and scientists working on drug delivery projectsin academia and industry. Faculty and industrial speakers involved in drug delivery researchpresent lectures in their
higher-level tasks earlier intheir careers, necessitating the development of this judgment in undergraduates. This clearly hasbecome a priority for many programs, as evidenced by the growth of project-based learning.Developing this type of judgment and creativity is challenging, but inquiry-based learning willplay an important role and well-tested tools for inspiring new types of knowledge acquisitionmethods in our students are needed.This paper describes hands-on, inquiry-based learning activities that were recently designed andimplemented in the first mechanics course taken by students in the Department of Civil andMechanical Engineering at the US Military Academy in part to help accelerate the developmentof students’ engineering judgment
Tajvidi P.E., Utah State University Moe Tajvidi is a PhD candidate in engineering education at Utah State University. His BS and MS degrees are in structural engineering and he has a sixteen year long career experience in structural engineering along with four years of instruction of civil engineering courses. In his teaching experience he has been committed to introducing real life engineering problems to the learning environment. The subjects he has taught include engineering mechanics (statics, dynamics, and mechanics of material), structural analysis and design, soil mechanics and foundation engineering. His research areas of interest include: use of computer simulation in engineering education, project-based
part of electrical and computer engineeringexpands, it is necessary for us to explore how curriculum design should be addressed. If we areto prepare students for a career in modern industry, it is imperative that we reconsider the skill-set that an undergraduate needs to succeed.19 Virtually none of our undergraduates go intosingle-topic specialties with their undergraduate degrees; they are members of multi-disciplinarydesign teams and are frequently in leadership-track positions in which they must considertechnological problems with concerns for the complex relationships across topics - theboundaries are fuzzier than ever.At the University of Virginia we are addressing this with a new breadth-first curriculum thatplaces a strong emphasis on
, electric power and electronics for technology students, senior design, as well as a long-standing residential/online graduate course on the fundamentals of biorenewable resources and technology. He has leveraged this interest into over $10M in teaching-related grant funding over his career and has contributed broadly to the literature in areas of curriculum, student risk characterization, and mentoring. He believes well trained, curious, thoughtful people are crucial to a university’s research effort, and similarly to the function and survival of society. For this reason, the overarching goal of his teaching is to impart the core content needed by the students, and to do so while encouraging inquisition and higher
engineering programs for K-12 education.Prof. Amy E. Landis, Clemson University Dr. Landis joined Clemson in June 2015 as the Thomas F. Hash ’69 Endowed Chair in Sustainable Development. Previously, she was an Associate Professor at Arizona State University in the School of Sustainable Engineering and the Built Environment. She began her career as an Assistant Professor at the University of Pittsburgh, after having obtained her PhD in 2007 from the University of Illinois at Chicago under the supervision of Dr. Thomas L. Theis. She has developed a research program in sustainable engineering of bioproducts. Her research ranges from design of systems based on industrial ecology and byproduct synergies, life cycle and
Paper ID #20287Examining engineering concepts in practice: Is conceptual understandingrelevant to practice?Dr. Shane A. Brown P.E., Oregon State University Shane Brown is an associate professor and Associate School Head in the School of Civil and Environmen- tal Engineering at Oregon State University. His research interests include conceptual change and situated cognition. He received the NSF CAREER award in 2010 and is working on a study to characterize prac- ticing engineers’ understandings of core engineering concepts. He is a Senior Associate Editor for the Journal of Engineering Education.Mr. Matthew Stephen Barner
faculty members fromtwo-year and four-year colleges in USA have requested our modules and IPAR. After a professorat Fairleigh Dickinson University in Hackensack NJ tried our material in his graduate class inforensics administration, a retired policeman who is going to start another career in computerforensics wrote: “I had completed both the Academic Dishonesty case and Incident Responseportion of this forensic game. I was very impressed about the real life experience it gives you.Everything that you could encounter is right in front of you. But I was more impressed with usingthe real life tools like FTK imager and Autopsy and well as other that the game tells you todownload in advance. I’m a believer in this game process of learning.”6
engineering programs at the University of Houston, Texas Tech University, and the University of Texas at Tyler. To promote confidence in student support services, the program’s department chair, the South Campus engineering program coordinator, and the faculty of the engineering program all maintain open-door policies. Additionally, staff and faculty meet with 5 students regularly—collectively and one-on-one—to discuss career goals and ensure necessary course sequences. This is especially important for students who may be the first in their families to attend college. Faculty members also mentor pre-engineering students in the Clear Horizons Early College High School, which is
Paper ID #20381Extended Faculty Development Effort Based on Faculty NeedsDr. Shane A. Brown P.E., Oregon State University Shane Brown is an associate professor and Associate School Head in the School of Civil and Environmen- tal Engineering at Oregon State University. His research interests include conceptual change and situated cognition. He received the NSF CAREER award in 2010 and is working on a study to characterize prac- ticing engineers’ understandings of core engineering concepts. He is a Senior Associate Editor for the Journal of Engineering Education.Mr. Matthew Stephen Barner, Oregon State University M.S
major Jhalil Paynefrom Central State University, pre-service STEM education teacher Brein Babbs from CentralState University, and in-service teachers David Oldiges and Kerensa Hughes from Xenia HighSchool/Greene County Career Center and Dayton Public Schools, respectively, for assisting withthe preparation of cellulosic materials for polymer fabrication and characterization presented inthis paper.References1. Roksa, J., Kilgo, C., Trolian, T., Pascarella, E. Blaich C., and Wise, K. “Engaging withDiversity: How Positive and Negative Diversity Interactions Influence Students’ CognitiveOutcomes”, Journal of Higher Education (2017) 88:3 297-322.2. Larive, C. K. “Problem-based learning in the analytical chemistry laboratory course”, AnalBioanal Chem
. “Pursuing and Adjusting to Engineering Majors: A Qualitative Analysis,” J. Career Assess., vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 48–63.
] Hsieh, S. "Skill Sets Needed for Industrial Automation Careers" 2016 ASEE AnnualConference, June 26-29, New Orleans, LA.[4] Robotics Industries Association (RIA). (2008-2017) The Growth of Robotics in STEMEducation. Accessed January 19,2017 from: http://www.robotics.org/robotic-content.cfm?id=243[5] Kapoor, Chetan. August 2015. Breaking down the robot-factory language barrier. Accessedon January 19, 2017 from Robotics Tomorrow Online Robotics Trade Magazine:http://www.roboticstomorrow.com/article/2015/08/breaking-down-the-robot-factory-language-barrier/6544/[6] Shum, A., Wang, Y., and Hsieh, S., “Design, Build and Remote Control of a MiniatureAutomated Robotic Sorting System,” International Journal of Computer Applications (0975 –8887), Volume
, no. 1 (2016): 36–39.5. National Institutes of Health, “Design by Biomedical Undergraduate Teams (DEBUT) Challenge,”National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering, May 22, 2013,https://www.nibib.nih.gov/training-careers/undergraduate-graduate/design-biomedical-undergraduate-teams-debut-challenge.