, the instructor`s videos were recorded during live lectures. This semester theclass was taught in traditional way but the videos recorded served as the backbone of this flippedclassroom implementation. They contained the lectures in which the concepts were introduced aswell as the solutions to some sample problems, but they also contained the class discussionsrecorded live during the Fall 2014 class. Nevertheless, during the subsequent semesters, whenthe flipped classroom approach was implemented, the students were asked to watch the recordedlectures before coming to the class. Throughout the 4 semesters considered in this study theinstructor made syllabus changes to ensure that the students are watching the recorded lectures asrequired. Some
expect that a major one would be that we learn what kind of real-life obstacles to expect in research. If I’m correct, I’d say that that goal has certainly been achieved …”References[1] Downey, G. L., Lucena, J. C., Moskal, B. M., Parkhurst, R., Bigley, T., Hays, C., Jesiek, B. K., Kelly, L., Miller, J., Ruff, S., Lehr, J. L., and Nichols-Belo, A., 2006, “The Globally Competent Engineer: Working Effectively with People Who Define Problems Differently,” J. Eng. Educ., 95(2), pp. 107–122.[2] Gerhardt, L., Blumenthal, P., and Spodek, K., 2002, “Educating the global engineer: A program to promote study abroad, international exchanges and diversity in undergraduate engineering,” Proceedings
between semi-conductors in a solar cell. Students then connect the story to an actual solar cell given anoverview of the cell’s structure and vocabulary terms. Students can be assigned to groups, witheach group assigned a scene from the story, following by whole-class discussionCurriculum connections: This lesson pre-supposes that students have completed a unit on atomicstructure. The lesson was an expansion of a unit on types of energy, as part of a sub-unit on solar. This material is based upon work supported in part by the National Science Foundation (NSF) and the Department of Energy (DOE) under NSF CA No. EEC-1041895. Any opinions, findings and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do
experience the roles of engineers throughplanning, design, experimentation, building, debugging and creating a finished prototype.Students can fully document the process to produce a written report on the project and give aconference type presentation of their results. One of the difficulties in developing a project for students is finding a device or systemthat will inspire interest and reward successful completion of the objectives. A Theremin is anideal project because of the adaptability of the circuits and the resultant instrument is a uniquedemonstration piece. The Theremin was invented in the early 1900’s by Lev Theremin1 andpatented in 1928 and marketed by RCA. It is considered the world’s first electronic instrument.The most unique
Cleaner Production, 108, 916–923. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.06.134Brncich, A., Shane, J. S., Strong, K. C., & Passe, U. (2011). Using integrated student teams to advance education in sustainable design and construction. International Journal of Construction Education and Research, 7(1), 22–40. http://doi.org/10.1080/15578771.2010.512034Ceulemans, K., Molderez, I., & Van Liedekerke, L. (2015). Sustainability reporting in higher education: A comprehensive review of the recent literature and paths for further research. Journal of Cleaner Production, 106, 127–143. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.09.052Dobson, H. E., & Tomkinson, C. B. (2012). Creating sustainable development change agents through
ScienceFoundation.References1. Jonassen, D.H., Toward a Design Theory of Problem Solving. Educational Technology Research and Development, 2000. 48(4): p. 63-85.2. Perrenet, J., P. Bouhuijs, and J. Smits, The suitability of problem-based learning for engineering education: theory and practice. Teaching in higher education, 2000. 5(3): p. 345-358.3. Heitmann, G., Project-oriented study and project-organized curricula: A brief review of intentions and solutions. European Journal of Engineering Education, 1996. 21(2): p. 121-131.4. Freeman, S., et al., Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2014: p. 201319030.5
Foundation (EEC-1460988).References1. S. H. Russell, M.P. Hancock, and J. McCullough, "Benefits of Undergraduate Research Experiences," Science, 316, 548-549, 2007.2. Unpublished data, Department of Plastics Engineering, University of Massachusetts Lowell.3. C. Gonzàlez, "When is a Mentor like a Monk?" Academe, 92(3), 29-32, 2006.4. J. Ishiyama, "Expectations and Perceptions of Undergraduate Research Mentoring: Comparing First Generation, Low Income White/Caucasian and African American Students," College Student Journal, 41, 540-549, 2007.5. S. Hurtado, N. L. Cabrera, M. H. Lin, L. Arellano and L. L. Espinosa, "Diversifying Science: Underrepresented Student Experiences in Structured Research Programs," Research in
this purpose.References1. Marshall, P. A., Lafond, S., Valente, J. (2012). “Do Students Learn in Summer School College Majors Classes? Grade Comparison and Student Self-Assessment Indicate In the Affirmative.” Journal of the Arizona-Nevada Academy of Science, 43(2), 61-66.2. Ghanat, S. T., Brannan, K., Welch, R., & Bower, K. C. “Comparison of Direct and Indirect Assessment of a Summer Engineering Economy Course taught with Active Learning Techniques.” Proceedings Of The 2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition.3. Geltner, P. , Logan, R. “The Influence of Term Length on Student Success” Santa Monica Coll., Research Report, RR-2001.4.1.04. Daniel, E. “A Review of Time-shortened Courses Across Disciplines”, College Student
were interested inhelping the campers afraid of swimming to get into the pool and enjoy without necessarilyhaving to swim. As a solution for their problem statement, they designed an underwater domewith a slide used to enter it from the top of the pool.Team 26 “sailor scouts” and team 36 “white tigers” had similar interests. Figure 3 shows theirprototypes. They brainstormed to find solutions to get from one station to another without havingto walk. Team 26 made an inflatable trampoline cart with rails that would be pulled by theirteam leader, while team 36’s cart would be driven by motors and power. Team 26 also addedrails for safety of the passengers; they also made the cart soft so it would go through narrowspaces, and made it inflatable so
Governmental Organization to pursue and proliferate ethical behavioural practices at the sprouting age of undergrad engineering students .Dr. Aravind Joshi, Business Ethics Foundation The author has worked with State Bank of India, one of the largest Public Sector Banks in India for 30 years in various capacities at different geogrphies. Post voluntary retirement in year 2000, the author has completed Master´s degree in Personnel Manage- ment and completed Doctorate in Human Resources Management. Author has been working as a facilitator and professor in reputed business schools and corportate concerns in India. The author has published various articles in Management and Soft skills in News papers, magazines and
or rubric, suitable for thespecific assignment.CPR1’s rubric asks students to provide two levels of peer evaluation: analytical (a list oforthogonal, atomistic criteria) and holistic (a single score based on the overall success of thesubmission). Within the CPR1 authoring template, the instructor composes the analyticalquestions, using as many individual items as need. The system automatically includes a last itemasking the student reviewer to rate the whole piece on a scale of 1 to 10. As indicated below,three types of rating scales are available for analytical items and one for the holistic rating. Response Type Scoring Method Display Analytical questions Binary – Yes / No
), April, 2009, San Diego, CA.[3]. Creswell, J. W. (2012). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publication.[4]. Deakin-Cric, R., Broadfoot, P., & Claxton, G. (2004). Developing an effective lifelong learning inventory: the ELLI project. Assessment in Education, 11(3), 247-272.[5]. Denzin N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2011). The sage handbook of qualitative research (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publication.[6]. Froyd, J., Borrego, M., Cutler, S., Prince, M., & Henderson, C., (2013). Estimates of use of research-based instructional strategies in core electrical or computer engineering courses, Accepted for publication in IEEE
in a singleclassroom or over multiple classes across universities, with input from additional instructors.AcknowledgementsThis work was made possible in part by a grant from the National Science Foundation (EEC1227110). Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in thismaterial are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National ScienceFoundation.Some of the data analysis and representation was performed using Igor Pro (WaveMetrics, Inc.,Oregon, USA) https://www.wavemetrics.comReferences[1] Chi, M.T.H. and R. Wylie, The ICAP Framework: Linking Cognitive Engagement to Active Learning Outcomes. Educational Psychologist, 2014. 49(4): p. 219-243.[2] Krause, S. and C. Waters
course was developed and deployed makes it model forpossible replicated at other institutions.Bibliography1. Hansen, R. E. (1995). Five principles for guiding curriculum development practice: The case of technological teacher education. Journal of Industrial Teacher Education. 32(2). Winter 1995.2. Arnold, A & Flumerfelt, S. (2012). Interlacing Mission, Strategic Planning, and Vision to Lean: Powerful DNA for Change. AASA Journal of Scholarship and Practice, 9(1), 26 - 47.3. Emiliani, B., Kensington, C., & Most, U. S. (2005). Lean in higher education.Center for Lean Business Management. Available at http://www. superfactory. com/articles/lean_higher_ed. Aspx.4. Emiliani, M. L. (2004). Improving business school
from http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=23306664. Ryan SJ Baker, Albert T. Corbett, and Vincent Aleven. 2008. More accurate student modeling through contextual estimation of slip and guess probabilities in bayesian knowledge tracing. In International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems, 406–415. Retrieved February 12, 2017 from http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-540- 69132-7_445. Benjamin S. Bloom. 1984. The 2 sigma problem: The search for methods of group instruction as effective as one-to-one tutoring. Educational researcher 13, 6: 4–16.6. William G. Bowen, Matthew M. Chingos, Kelly A. Lack, and Thomas I. Nygren. 2014. Interactive Learning Online at Public Universities: Evidence from a Six-Campus
experts claimed would makelibraries obsolete. Some experts predicted that by 1970 technical libraries would be completelyautomated.[21] In late 1961, ASEE nominated McGowan and George S. Bonn, a former ESLCchair, to serve on the Engineering Information Services Committee of the Engineers JointCouncil (EJC).[22] Formed in 1952, the EJC was a federation of three dozen Americanengineering societies including ASEE. The EJC’s main purpose was to facilitate cooperationamong its members in order to address common problems.[23] It was especially interested intechnical information, libraries, and engineering education. For example, in the early 1950s theEJC led an initiative to rebuild the engineering libraries of war-ravaged countries by serving as
Paper ID #19637Approaches to Coaching Students in Design ReviewsDr. Robin Adams, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Robin S. Adams is an Associate Professor in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University and holds a PhD in Education, an MS in Materials Science and Engineering, and a BS in Mechanical Engineering. She researches cross-disciplinarity ways of thinking, acting and being; design learning; and engineering education transformation.Mr. Tiago R. Forin, Rowan University Tiago Forin is a PhD candidate in Engineering Education and researcher at Purdue University affiliated with
] Juacquez, R, Gude, V.G., Hanson, A., Auzenne, M, & Williamson, S., “Enhancing criticalthinking skills of civil engineering students through Supplemental Instruction”, Conference Proceedings of the ASEE, 2007.[4] Lin, J., and Woolston, D.C., “Important lessons learned from seven years of experience inundergraduate academic support programs”, Conference Proceedings of the ASEE/IEE Frontiersin Education Conference, Saratoga Springs NY, 2008.[5] Mahdi, A. E., “Introducing peer-supported learning approach to tutoring in engineering andtechnology courses”, International Journal of Electrical Engineering Education, 43(4), 2006,pp277-287.[6] Malm, J
transportationeducation. They are now available to the public. Before-and-after studies showed that theeducational games can improve students’ understanding of the targeted concepts significantly.Updates were made to encounter the issues faced when the games opened to larger scale ofaudiences.For the future work, the team will keep collecting feedback for the games and make updates andrevisions to meet the requirements from the broader user group.AcknowledgementThis work was funded by NSF- TUES-Type 1 grant: Game-Aided Pedagogy to ImproveStudents' Learning Outcomes and Engagement in Transportation Engineering. Grant number1245728.Reference:1. Gwee, S., Y.-S. Chee, and E.-M. Tan. Assessment of student outcomes of mobile game- based learning. in
between STEMcontent fields and an interdisciplinary approach to learning. This project advances pedagogicalunderstanding about how to teach, assess, and evaluate engineering and STEM in aninterdisciplinary manner and how to translate these evidence-based research findings into broadclassroom practice through the framework and through curricular units.ReferencesClements, D. H. (2007). Curriculum research: Toward a framework for "research-based curricula". Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 38(1), 35-70.Farmer, S., Moore, T. J., & Tank, K. M. (2015). Using STEM to reinforce measurement skills. Teaching Children Mathematics, 22(3), 196-199. doi: 10.5703/1288284314653Moore, T. J., Glancy, A. W., Tank, K. M., Kersten, J. A
the game. References 1. APPENDIX I – Engineering Design in the NGSS [PDF]. (2013, April). Next Generation Science Standards. 2. P21 Framework Definitions [PDF]. (2015, May). Partnership for 21st Century Learning. 3. Brophy, S., Klein, S., Portsmore, M. and Rogers, C. (2008), “Advancing Engineering Education in P12 Classrooms”. Journal of Engineering Education, 97: 369–387. 4. Bowen, B. (2014, June), “K12 Teacher Internships: Professional Development in the Engineering Design Process and STEM Learning Paper”. 2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Indianapolis
Student Transfer. Community College Review, 1993. 20(4): p. 27-37.3. Hagedorn, L.S., et al., Transfer between community colleges and 4-year colleges: The all-American game. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 2006. 30(3): p. 223-242.4. National Academies, Barriers and Opportunities for 2-Year and 4-Year STEM Degrees: Systemic Change to Support Diverse Student Pathways, S. Malcom and M. Feder, Editors. 2016, The National Academies Press: Washington, DC.5. National Academy of Engineering, Workshop on Effective Practices in Supporting Transfer Students. 2015.6. National Science Foundation, Women, Minorities, and Persons with Disabilities in Science and Engineering: 2015. 2015, National
#P120A140064. Opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendationsexpressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of thefunding agency.ReferencesAbel, J. & Deitz, R. (2014). Do the Benefits of College Still Outweigh the Costs? Current Issues in Economics and Finance, Federal Reserve Bank of New York, 20(3), 2014.American Psychological Association, (2012). Ethnic and Racial Disparities in Education: Psychology’s Contributions to Understanding and Reducing Disparities, American Psychological Association, 2012.Auerbach, S. (2004). Engaging Latino parents in supporting college pathways: Lessons from a college access program. Journal of Hispanic Higher Education, 3(2), 125–145.Baum, S
the overall individual ecosystems developed by working groups wereanalyzed by the project evaluators to produce an initial engineering education ecosystem map,Figure 4. Figure 4: Engineering education ecosystem map.CitationsAtman, C. J., Sheppard, S. D., Turns, J., Adams, R. S., Fleming, L. N. , Stevens, R, . . . Lund , D. (2010). Enabling Engineering Student Success: The Final Report for the Center for the Advancement of Engineering Education. San Rafael, CA.Augustine, Norman R. (2013). No Place Like Home. Innovation America, 11(1).Board, National Science. (2012). Science and Engineering Indicators 2012. Arlington VA: National Science Foundation.Carlson, C. R., & Wilmot, W. W. (2006
to empower our graduates to impact society by innovating withinthe contexts of social justice, peace, humanitarian advancement, and sustainable practices.AcknowledgementsThe authors thank the National Science Foundation for support of this work (Award #1519453).The views expressed herein are solely those of the authors.References 1. Comprehensive Assessment of Team Member Effectiveness (CATME) information available at https://info.catme.org/about/overview/ 2. Sgoutas-Emch, S., Baird, L., Myers, P., Camacho, M., & Lord, S. (2016). We’re Not All White Men: Using a Cohort/Cluster Approach to Diversify Faculty Hiring in STEM. Thought and Action, 32(1-Summer 2016), 91-107, 2016. http://www.nea.org/assets/docs/HE
Curriculum: Paper to be presented at the American Society for Engineering Education 2017 Annual Conference and Exposition.Creative Commons. (2017). Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International. Retrieved 02/12, 2017, from https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/Crittenden, K., Hall, D., & Brackin, P. (2010). Living with the Lab: Sustainable Lab Experiences for Freshman Engineering Students. Paper presented at the American Society for Engineering Education.Cronk, S., Hall, D., & Nelson, J. (2009). Living with the Lab: A Project-Based Curriculum for First-Year Engineering Students. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 2009 ASEE Gulf-Southwest Annual Conference.Hall, D., Barker
single institution study. Journal of Engineering Education 101(1), 6-27.Miskioglu, E. (2016, June), Self-‐Efficacy in Senior Design: Effects of Time and Team Paper presented at 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, New Orleans, Louisiana. 10.18260/p.26157 Morocz, R. J., & Levy, B. D., & Forest, C. R., & Nagel, R. L., & Newstetter, W. C., & Talley, K. G., & Linsey, J. S. (2015, June), University Maker Spaces: Discovery, Optimization and Measurement of Impacts Paper presented at 2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Seattle, Washington. 10.18260/p.24967 Morocz, R. J., & Levy, B., & Forest, C
thehighest risk while still supporting those struggling to make efficient progress through thecurriculum. Our hope is that as the rate of student engagement with the assessment improves, sowill its impact on students.References[1] Tyson, C. (2014, September 10). The 'murky middle.' Inside Higher Ed. Retrieved from https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2014/09/10/maximize-graduation-rates-colleges- should-focus-middle-range-students-research-shows[2] Bloom, J. L., Hutson, B. L., & He, Y. (2008). The appreciative advising revolution. Champaign, IL: Stipes Publishing.[3] Meyer, M., & Marx, S. (2014). Engineering dropouts: A qualitative examination of why undergraduates leave engineering. Journal of Engineering Education, 103(4