used in ourlaboratory course. For example, a Progressive Paper was used in a chemistry capstone course,in which students wrote a large laboratory report in sections, resulting in a complete paper at theend of the semester (Van Bramer & Bastin, 2013). The students received detailed feedback aftereach section, which they could use to revise the section as well as apply it to future sections.Breaking the laboratory report into parts and spreading the work out demonstrated to studentshow to keep the project manageable. Coinciding with this, the successive draft submissionsshowed significant score improvements over time, and the students and instructors valued theexperience. In fact, teaching a process approach to writing can support students
students in the Electrical and Computer Engineering and the MechanicalEngineering Departments for this project has proved fruitful and an extremely positiveexperience. A capstone project with a group of students with different backgrounds allowedstudents to utilize their varying skill sets. While there are many core courses in the engineeringcurriculum that are included in both the electrical and mechanical tracks, the divergence ofcourses and emphases between departments meant that the students needed to learn each other’sstrengths to determine who would be best at various aspects of the project. Electrical and computer engineering students were able to help compose the basis of the modeland determine the initial direction of the project. In
librarians get caught up on teaching only search skills andfinding databases, and instead they need focus on choosing and narrowing topics, conceptmapping, and developing search terms.Finally in the article by Paretti et al4, the authors researched the types of team conflictsexperienced by teams in Capstone classes. While there were different reasons for conflict, mostof faculty considered the problems to be generated from team dynamics. Conflicts or problemsmaking decisions related to the project itself, including scope, criteria, alternative selectionemerged as a prime consideration for teams4 The mentoring that supports capstone teams isconducted by the course instructors and graduate assistants. However, librarians who have abackground or
to gently wake the sleeper at anoptimal point in their sleep cycle. The idea for RemZen was conceived by Jeremiah S. inan entrepreneurial capstone program (Launch-in-9). The project attracted small angelinvestments and an equity offer, as well as the attention and support of experts in themedical, technology, and start-up community. It successfully completed a crowdfundingcampaign and delivered a first product to the backers. However, it stalled after thefounder ran out of funds for living expenses and accepted a full-time, permanent job.Jon T., Matthew S., Taylor R. and Anne P.: Aquaponic SystemThis student team developed a self-regulating, closed-loop aquaponic system bycombining a fish tank with artificial lighting and growing medium. The
the collection of 2D images that are then translated to 3D byexternal reconstruction software.As with many computer engineering programs, students of the computer engineering program atUtah Valley University (UVU) conclude their degree programs with a semester capstone designexperience. The intent is for students to utilize competencies developed in the first three years ofthe curriculum in the solution of an embedded design problem. This paper summarizes theresult of an undergraduate capstone experience where the feasibility of utilizing ubiquitoustechnology (2D ultrasound) to mimic the functionality of enhanced but expensive 3D ultrasoundmachines is assessed.Capstone Projects at UVUThe goal of projects in our Capstone Design course is to
solving, and skills development, who also took the previous Engineering Practicecourse. The recent student-faculty research collaborative work in SHE (Safety, Health, andEnvironmental) Subjects in 3D Printing led to multiple journal papers, including a recognitionfrom Emerald Literati Network by a Highly Commended Paper Award7. Original work in 3Dprinting material development have also been carried out by students were enrolled inEngineering Practice to be shifted to this new course.With the new research course, each student or student team will be matched to a faculty memberbased on their interests. The capstone course at this department is usually an interdisciplinaryone. The new research course projects may also include a good number of
full list in Table 1). While the rubric was designed to allowfor assessment of a variety of project types, it has only been applied to civil engineering studentdesign projects.5The rubric includes two four-point rating scales to aid evaluators in judging capstone reportsbased on the 16 sustainable design criteria. The earned points scale [0-3] captures the extent towhich students consider each sustainable design criterion in their capstone projects. Evaluatorsassign a score of 0 to projects that show no evidence of incorporating the design criterion, whilea score of 3 is assigned if the project shows evidence of extensive criterion application. Thepotential points scale [0-3] describes the extent to which each sustainable design criterion
Paper ID #20374Student Paper: Small Team Agile Systems Engineering For Rapid Prototyp-ing of Robotic SystemsMr. Charles Avery Noren, Texas A&M University Vehicle Systems & Control Laboratory Charles Noren is an undergraduate research assistant at the Texas A&M University Vehicle Systems & Control Laboratory and task leader for the rail-based robotic system project. He is expected to graduate with a Bachelor of Science in Aerospace Engineering in May of 2018, and plans to continue his education at Texas A&M University with a Master of Science in Aerospace Engineering.Kendra Lynne Andersen, Texas A&M
extending acrossall four years of the undergraduate coursework including: Introduction to Civil Engineering (CE103) Surveying (CE 205), Geomatics (CE 208), Surveying Lab (CE 235/239), HighwayEngineering (CE 302), Geotechnical Engineering Lab (CE 402), Introduction to GeotechnicalEngineering (CE 409), and Capstone Design (CE 432). Teamwork assignments in these coursesinclude: laboratory teams, problems solving sessions, homework assignments, classpresentations, exam preparation exercises proposal preparation, design projects, and designproject presentations. Course-based Embedded Indicator results, Department Senior Exit Surveydata, and student perception data of teamwork effectiveness will be evaluated and compared.Results will be useful in
engineering profession, and through this coursework, to learn frameworks for analysis: a policy or an economic framework, for example. These courses are also open to (and popular with) nonmajors, leading to interdisciplinary discussions and project teams. The curriculum builds to a unique capstone experience (e.g. Rossmann and Sanford Bernhardt, 2015).Engineering students at Lafayette College also take approximately one-third of theircourses outside STEM subjects, in the humanities, arts, and social sciences. Thesedistribution requirements introduce engineering students to alternate “ways of knowing,”comprising a liberal education. However, these requirements are not necessarilyintegrative; they may provide opportunities for
collaborative,mutually agreeable relationship that involves teaching, learning and building knowledge. Theirinteraction may be on a time from requiring basic skills to application of advanced, disciplinaryskills, as in a capstone experience. Students may observe, participate, teach, or offer a talent.Some of these opportunities may embody values orientation, such as practical and active learningfor engineering and different technical fields. Some students may interact in style, production orinstallation of a small project or be a part of an oversized project with business partners’ currentactivities, while others might have students support a method of growth, development, andvisioning around core issues. No matter what kind of engagement, the outcome
engineering degree programs, includes combined with an embedded computer on mobileproviding a two-semester capstone project designexperience. In a few cases, undergraduate electrical 1platforms to demonstrate automatic following Details of these technologies were received asscenarios in indoor environments.Figure 1.0 Illustration of stop-and-go and adaptive cruisecontrol (ACC) technologies. Figure 2.0 Raspberry Pi 2B Single Board Computer intriguing by
. Students complete an integrative design project in each courseand apply presented theory into real-world engineering problems. Course deliverables includewritten reports with detailed design data and analysis, group and individual presentations, andone or more working, physical product prototypes. Projects are also used to introduce enterprisesoft skills, including various levels of communication, teamwork, professionalism, andrecognizing ethical values. The sequence is finalized by a senior level capstone “Senior Design”course that requires student participation in interdisciplinary teams to bring a product fromconceptual design through manufacture. Activities include detail design, material selection, costestimation, process planning, schedule
or capstone projects are usually the first experience college students have withexperimental or engineering design processes.4 Incorporation of authentic PBL methods to teachengineering principles with uncertain investigation outcomes to a broader group ofunderrepresented students (i.e. minorities, women) prior to research based coursework enablesthem to make connections between instruction and the real world earlier and to gain a deeperunderstanding of their course content.5-9Problem Based Learning Design and ObjectivesThe engineering practice of using models to simulate systems and interactions as a means toconstruct explanations and design solutions based on valid and reliable evidence is directlyrelatable to the instrumental analysis
“Disaster”) Robot. This four-wheeled, differential steering robotincludes a Texas Instruments LaunchPad microcontroller, wireless networking and a phone appto allow the user to control the robot remotely. Both the Krisys and DSTR robots continue to beused and improved through lab and capstone projects. The team also brings teacher enhancement experiences to the project. Faculty haveparticipated in teacher and curriculum development workshops hosted by the College ofEngineering, the College of Education, and local groups involved with preparing math andscience teacher to integrate more technology and engineering into their high school courses. Finally the research team has experience in all three of the primary areas associated
ways of thinking)” (p. 2). Theyimplemented a studio requirement each year, where project based learning, community service,and reflection are highlighted. Kellam et al.8 drew from student reflections and focus grouptranscripts in their evaluation of this long-term integration. Guthrie et al.6 used quantitativestudent self assessment and collected student comments to gauge the effectiveness of theirinterdisciplinary capstone design course. Rhee et al.9 in “A Case Study of a Co-instructedMultidisciplinary Senior Capstone Project in Sustainability” discussed a senior capstone coursewhere students engage together with specific shared projects, share classroom space and meetingtimes. Mentors from several engineering and non-engineering disciplines
faculty recognizes the benefit in combining service learning activities intobeginning engineering courses, as well as capstone courses. This is done by planning a feasibleproject with a community-based organization, having both beginning and senior level engineeringstudents engage in it over a period of one to two semesters.The paper discusses an effective approach on how to integrate learning in a reverse hierarchicalmanner. It also presents measures to evaluate both successes and failures of this approach. Theprojected longevity of the approach, tackling various projects, is integrated into the study. The twoCECM faculty members also discuss the viability of transferring this approach to other universitiesand engineering colleges.INTRODUCTIONA
that provided the projects, and one of his engineers who worked on the project.During the students’ final team design project presentations, three (3) engineering faculty, three(3) industry professionals, and six (6) students provided feedback on the level of the team’s oralcommunication skills compared to those of other young professionals. They were also asked torate the team’s oral communication via the Association of American Colleges and UniversitiesOral Communication VALUE Rubric. Students were also asked to rate their teammates via theTeamwork VALUE Rubric (Association of American Colleges and Universities 2010). Theratings were made on a scale of 1 to 4, with 4 representing greatest communication or teamworkskill (i.e. capstone
higher enrollments in subsequent years. Secondly, itwould offer our students a chance to work on a real-world engineering design problem thatwould make a lasting impact on the community. Along with the transport course, the potentialwould exist for students to complete their capstone design project by continuing their work onthe evaporator. For the syrup-making program, the main benefit would be an evaporator withimproved efficiency and/or safety, making the syrup production process easier and more flexible.They would also gain some insight into how the engineering field views the world, andpotentially increase their technical and scientific literacy. This could help to improve otheraspects of production not specifically addressed by the student
four levels: Level 1: Freshman engineering. Level 2: Basic digital system. Level 3: Advanced digital system without a processor. Level 4: Advanced digital system with a processor. Level 5: Capstone projects. The level 1 is for freshman engineering students. Many schools now have an “introductionto engineering’’ course for the new engineering students. It is usually a project-oriented courseto introduce the basic engineering concepts and practices. The level 2 corresponds to the first digital system course in the curriculum, which covers thecombinational circuits, sequential circuits, and FSM 17. Unlike the first digital system course, there is no single “standard” follow-up course. Theadvanced topics
://lectroetch.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/gmk-grid-marking-kit.pdf11. Alan, D. J., Magleby, S. P., Sorensen, C. D., and Todd, R. H., A Review of Literature on Teaching Engineering Design Through Project-Oriented Capstone Courses, Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 86, No. 1, pp. 17-28, 1997.12. Lackey, L.W., Jenkins, H.E., Mines, R.O., and Schultz, S.R., Utilizing Senior Capstone Design as an Instrument for Student and Faculty Assessment of Program Outcomes, 2009 ASEE Conference, Marietta, GA, paper, 2009006MIN, pp. 1-11, April 2009.13. Todd, R.H., Sorensen, C. D., and Magleby, C. D., Designing a Capstone Course to satisfy industrial customers, Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 82, No. 2, April 1993, pp. 92- 100.14. Paliwal, M
, 2017 Teams and Team Building at Baylor University: Why Should We Do This and Where Should This Occur in the Curriculum?AbstractExperience with teams is a desirable outcome with employers. Academic programs often havestudent teams accomplish course, design, and lab projects starting with the freshmen introductorycourses and culminating with capstone senior design. Where do students learn about teams in thecurriculum? How do they learn to be good team members? It seems the most pervasive approachto teams in higher education is a “sink or swim” attitude where teams are allowed to form on theirown and work out any issues that arise. Little, if any, formal instruction on being a team memberis given throughout the curriculum. Even less
heavily integrated into the classroom piece whichwould be not be replicable in our project as we had no classroom piece to use to grade such. “Inengineering, there are many examples of service-learning programs ranging from freshmanintroductory courses to senior capstone courses. Despite their successes, an area that theengineering education community has yet to fully develop is the reflection component of service-learning.”3 We have made a conscious choice to keep the project housed outside the bounds of a forcredit course due to student feedback which will be specifically discussed in the results section.RESULTS The exhibits that have been created over the years have varied greatly in design and have grown in depthand complexity over that
achieve student learning outcomes at hightaxonomic levels; however, a large cohort of Civil Engineers fall short in achieving learningoutcomes at the highest levels. An analysis of course outcomes, particularly in the senior levelSustainability course and the senior capstone design course, presents the results of curricularedesign in regards to sustainability. Continuing the longitudinal study begun in 2015, there isan enhanced immersion of students in all the environmental courses with an emphasis on project-based learning; civil students are exposed to sustainability in the required Fundamentals inEngineering with a majority of civil students also taking the stand alone Sustainability course.Survey results continue to demonstrate that a focus
test section and actively with a recirculation valve. The total cost for this projectwas approximately $3500 and required 3 months of part-time work to construct. Flow velocitymeasurements in the test section were made by simple flow visualization and found velocityranged from 0.32-0.65 ft/s within a 6”x12”x12” test section. The water flume was subsequentlyused by a senior capstone project for testing of their water turbine. Student self-evaluations wereused to assess whether their experiences reinforced fluid mechanics concepts and developed theirskills in experimental fluid mechanics. The results show that the students believed their workwith the water tunnel strongly met the learning objectives in the area of experimental methodsand
the current paper.A course in which students applied systems engineering principles to a lunar mining robotproject was described at the 2013 ASEE conference. The authors argue for the “inclusion ofsystems engineering in university-level capstone curricula to improve engineering design.”2Although this project involved an intense competition, it was limited to paper designs, whichlacked the realism of hardware-intensive projects. The claim made in the previously cited studyabout the importance of real hardware was found to ring true.Just last year, a couple of engineering educators from California made the case for integratingsystems engineering into senior design. They claim that the traditional sequence of courses inmost mechanical
offered for the first time this year, and since only fivesenior energy engineering students were eligible for capstone design projects this year, weused overlap scheduling and included those five in the same room with the 65 students inthe ME capstone course. The capstone project for the energy engineering students wasproposed by the university’s building energy systems manager – review and update thebuilding energy models for four new campus buildings built with LEED certification inmind, identify discrepancies between actual building performance and model predictions,and develop engineering proposals for projects which provide a return on investment in lessthan 3 years and that would enable the buildings to meet or exceed the energy use goals
improvement.AcknowledgementThis material is supported by the National Science Foundation under DUE Grant Numbers 1501952and 1501938. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations presented are those of theauthors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.References[1] Wang, J., Fang, A. & Johnson, M., (2008). Enhancing and assessing life long learning skills through capstone projects. ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings. Pittsburgh, PA, 2008-324.[2] Shuman, L.J., Besterfield-Sacre, M. & Mcgourty, J., (2005). The abet "professional skills" — can they be taught? Can they be assessed? Journal of Engineering Education, 94 (1), 41-55.[3] Earnest, J., (2005). Abet
following questions are left unaddressed: how toevaluate the effectiveness of a gamification product in education? What would students learn ifthey create and criticize gamification products? To answer the above research questions, thispaper proposes a peer-based gamification critiquing process based on peer-developedgamification products. Both the development and critique processes were applied throughCapstone projects. Capstone projects in the United States have become increasingly popularamong many engineering education programs under ABET requirements since the 20th century[19-21]. Capstone projects are different from traditional engineering courses in terms ofproviding senior-standing engineering students with experience solving “real world
6b: A 3D printed smartphone stand designed by a freshman4. Applications in Research, Community Engagement and Outreacha. Utilizing AM in Student Research through Senior Design Capstone CourseEngineering technology curriculum of the Department of ENT at Miami University, Ohioincludes a capstone course, which consists of a sequence of two semester-long courses namely:ENT 497-Senior Design Project I and ENT 498-Senior Design Project II. The students conductmajor open-ended research and design projects utilizing their knowledge and skills acquired inearlier course work, work in teams, and incorporate engineering standards. The projects offeredin this course are chosen from real-world problems. Design projects include the establishment