theseevents occurred over a five-year period (2010 – 2015). The authors will describe the curriculum,development of courses and laboratories, the senior design capstone, and preparation of the self-study report necessary for accreditation. All curricula and assessment tools are linked to amodified Bloom’s Taxonomy and ABET Outcome 3 Criteria a through k. A description of theuniversity, its service area, and student population is also provided. In 2015 West Texas A&MUniversity achieved a major milestone through designation as a Hispanic Serving Institution(HSI, 25% or more of student population) [1] and is seeking to improve participation of womenand underserved populations in STEM fields, such as civil engineering. Lessons learned andfuture
condition.Even though the Rapid Prototyping Laboratories are equipped with three FDM/FFF (UPrint SE,CubeX, CubeProDuo), two Powder-based (Prometal RXD and Projet 460plus), and one SLA(Projet 1200) printer, maintenance issues and time sharing of the equipment with other coursesincluding the capstone projects reduce the availability of 3D printers. Therefore, multiple newmachines including a Mendelmax and Prusa Mendel were built to utilize in the class. Since theSLA Viper machine was replaced with a Projet 1200, the old but comprehensive software tool of3D Lightyear had to be replaced with new tools used for both processing of the STL files andprinting. These new tools are easier to use but not as comprehensive as the old ones. Thus, a low-cost software
Breakers Course, a course targeted to take the students out of the books and into applying their core competences and the scientific methods to put urban legends to the test and understand all sorts of phenomena.Mr. Maurice Forget, Aalto University c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Geographically Distributed Teams in Engineering Design: Best Practices and Issues in Cases of International Teams Working from Opposite HemispheresAbstractIt is not rare to have engineering design teams in companies, working from different parts of the worldon a shared project. This new addition to the working context has been triggered by advances incommunication technologies and the knowledge economy. This begs
Paper ID #19163Practicing What we Preach: A Multi-Disciplinary Team Teaching Multi-DisciplinaryTeamworkDr. Ada Hurst, University of Waterloo Ada Hurst is a Lecturer in the Department of Management Sciences at the University of Waterloo. She has taught and coordinated the capstone design project course for the Management Engineering program since 2011. She also teaches courses in organizational behavior, theory, and technology. She received a Bachelor of Applied Science in Electrical Engineering, followed by Master of Applied Science and Doctor of Philosophy degrees in Management Sciences, all from the University of
assessment.18-24Otherresearches focused on the assessment methods of program and course. Course is an importantcarrier of engineering education, and course quality is the core element of the engineeringeducation quality. Therefore, the course assessment is an important aspect of the qualityassurance in engineering education. Related researches concentrated on general courseassessment, capstone design course assessment,25 EPICS project assessment,26 and also shareexperiences based on course assessment within institutions practice.272.2. Research ReflectionThe research perspective tends to the nature of “practice” when responding the programaccreditation, however, weakens the nature of “theory” when discussing the quality ofengineering education. Most
speaking countries maytest out the first level of Academic Writing course. In that case, the students must choose to takea second-language course such as Chinese or German language courses offered at the jointinstitute.Every student must complete a 4-credit Capstone Design course replacing the graduation thesisthat is typical in traditional Chinese universities. Through carefully designed and open-endeddesign problems, students learn how to approach design problems in a systematic way and howto use the engineering knowledge and skills acquired from various courses to tackle engineeringproblems. Many “soft skills” such as oral presentation, teamwork, critical thinking, timemanagement are re-emphasized in this course. A full project report and a
Civil Engineering Elective; for Civil Engineering, Capstone 3 advanced NTU Challenge undergrad Workshop of Required with Environmental elective Building and 3 6 Planning and projects; Planning, NTU Design graduate level Elective; for Principles of Air
and the school of peace studies. The course will be co-taught, with GDHrepresenting engineering and ACF representing peace studies. The semester will be spent on asingle project, designing a drone for social good. Drones come with an ideal combination oftechnical and ethical challenges that will force students from both schools to wrestle togetherwith unfamiliar questions. One of our primary learning outcomes will be for this struggle tocultivate individual empathy across disciplinary boundaries. Put more practically, we want thestudents to understand how using alternative disciplinary frameworks changes theirunderstanding of problems. During the semester small teams (4-6 students) will each 1) build aquadcopter drone using the open source
impacts (selected from among 18 potentialtopics listed on the survey): professional practice issues, ethical failures, engineering code ofethics, societal impacts of engineering and technology, ethics in design projects, ethical theories,risk and liability, sustainability, safety, and engineering decisions in the face of uncertainty.Among the professional issues courses described on the survey, 23 were undergraduate coursesrequired within civil engineering (and 8 also in environmental engineering). Four were coursesalready identified at institutions that graduate the largest number of civil engineeringundergraduate students (described previously). Online information that was found on theadditional professional issues courses was added to Table 2A
lastiteration, the 2017 Report Card for America’s Infrastructure, America’s cumulative GPA forinfrastructure received a D+, which is the same as it was in 2013 although grades improved inseven infrastructure categories. The 2017 Report Card demonstrates that when investments aremade and projects move forward, the grades rise. In addition to this national Report Card,ASCE’s sections and branches also prepare state and regional Infrastructure Report Cards on arolling basis, to localize these public education and advocacy efforts to the state and local levels.Nearly half of the states have a recent Report Card.Infrastructure Categories, Grading Scale, and Key CriteriaThe 16 categories graded in ASCE’s Infrastructure Report Card include Aviation, Bridges
ability to discern best fit is gained by experience with successin this area. In regard to safety, safety concerns are paramount in industry, while they may not beextensively covered in engineering coursework. Certainly, safety is emphasized in lab classes,and a capstone design project may include safety as a criterion; but the issues of meetingindustry-specific safety standards, machine guarding, and OSHA requirements are much moreprevalent in industry than in any undergraduate courses.ImplicationsReturners and direct pathway students do not differ in their self-perception of their ability toutilize computer applications. Since it is a commonly held belief that there is a great differencebetween older and younger students—“digital natives and
as well as other outcomes that are more distantto the experiments themselves; e.g., teamwork, professionalism and ethics, life-long learning,and especially communications. This paper will describe the process of redesigning a junior-level mechanical engineering laboratory on measurements and instrumentation at Georgia Tech.Such classes are fairly standard in ME curricula, and they are often structured so that a newmeasurement technique, or new sensor/actuator is introduced in every lab. Such courses have theadvantage of introducing students to a wide variety of instruments and measurement techniques,but they do this at the risk of losing conceptual connections between the weekly projects. Thispotential problem was compounded by the original
Paper ID #19345Development of Enhanced Value, Feature, and Stakeholder Views for a Model-Based Design ApproachDr. William A Kline, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Bill Kline is Professor of Engineering Management and Associate Dean of Innovation at Rose-Hulman. His teaching and professional interests include systems engineering, quality, manufacturing systems, in- novation, and entrepreneurship. As Associate Dean, he directs the Branam Innovation Center which houses campus competition teams, maker club, and projects. He is currently an associate with IOI Partners, a consulting venture focused on innovation tools and
engineering education research interests focus on learning through service-based projects and using an entrepreneurial mindset to further engineering education innovations. He also researches the development of reuse strategies for waste materials. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Incorporation of Ethics and Societal Impact Issues into First Year Engineering Courses: Results of a National SurveyAbstractThis paper summarizes the results of a national study that asked engineering and computingfaculty to report the types of courses where they incorporated ethics and/or societal impacttopics. An online survey was conducted in spring 2016, with 1216 responses from
entrepreneurial mindset by internationaldevelopment project”, in American Society of Engineering Education Conference, proceedingsof, Seattle, WA, 2015.[9] Gerhart, A. L., and Carpenter, D. D., “Campus-wide course modification program toimplement active & collaborative learning and problem-based learning to address theentrepreneurial mindset”, in American Society of Engineering Education Conference,proceedings of, Atlanta, GA, 2013.[10] Boulanger,B.O., and Tranquillo, J., “Blending entrepreneurship and design in an immersiveenvironment”, in American Society of Engineering Education Conference, proceedings of,Seattle, WA, 2015.[11] Brouwer, R., Sykes, A., VanderLeest, S. H., “Entrepreneurial mindset development in asenior design/capstone course”, in
assignment required a full documentation of the final project describedabove. Analyzing the design journals from this capstone project should provide an indication ofthe students’ design thinking mindset after the course instruction. A sample of 92 artifacts wascollected from students enrolled in the Design Thinking course during the same Fall 2016semester. The sample size of 92 was chosen to demonstrate the research method and validate itseffectiveness. Sampling of the artifacts yielded a data set with 44 design journals from theintegrated sections and 48 from the non-integrated sections. All artifacts were sampled from thefinal design project and evaluated with the Engineering Design Process Portfolio Scoring Rubric(see Appendix A). This rubric
. Mike’s research concerns how people think and learning, and specifically how technology can enhance the way people think and learn. His NSF-funded project, GEEWIS (http://www.geewis.uconn.edu/), focused on streaming real-time water quality pond data via the Internet and providing support for the integration of this authentic data into secondary and higher education science classrooms. His approach features the analysis of log files, ”dribble files,” that maintain time-stamped listing of navigation choices and lag time. This approach has been applied to hypertext reading (Spencer Foundation grant), videodisc-based prob- lem solving (Jasper project), and online navigation (Jason project). Recent work concerns playful
and Barnes 2009). When compared to writing code in atraditional programming assignment, the students that practiced the learning objectives within agame environment outperformed students who participated in the traditional assignment (Eagleand Barnes 2009).There are several ways to assess student progress towards learning goals. Traditional methodsinclude, but are not limited to, quizzes, papers, projects, reports, portfolios, exams, attitudesurveys, journal entries, and capstone design projects. However, entirely student-designed gamesas a method for assessing student learning is absent from the literature.This paper explores the use of student-developed board games as a method to assess studentmastery of construction and engineering
development, engineering education, product design for developing areas, and the utilization of renewable resources for the production of chemicals.Ms. Terri Christiansen Bateman , Brigham Young University Terri Bateman is adjunct faculty in the Brigham Young University College of Engineering and Technol- ogy where she has worked with Women in Engineering and Technology at BYU, numerous mechanical engineering capstone senior design teams, the Global Engineering Outreach class, and the Compliant Mechanisms Research Group. She received her bachelor’s and master’s degrees in Mechanical Engineer- ing from BYU and also worked at the Ford Motor Company as a manufacturing and design engineer in Automatic Transmission
paper describes how Makerspaces help cultivate students’ communities ofpractice (CoP). We interviewed 19 engineering students with different participation levels in theMakerspace, from different engineering disciplines to understand how they became participantsin the makers’ community of practice at the Richard L’Abbé Makerspace. We found that theMakerspace provided engineering students with a platform for forming a CoP that shares acommon interest in making, by providing them with access to equipment, workshops,competitions, and by connecting engineering students from various disciplines to work on hands-on engineering projects that allowed them to translate theories learned in classroom to practice.The paper also describes the lessons learned
Paper ID #18698Scaling a Faculty Professional Development Program to Multiple Disciplinesthrough Disciplinary Communities of Practice Evolving from Evidence-BasedWorkshopsProf. Stephen J Krause, Arizona State University Stephen Krause is professor in the Materials Science Program in the Fulton School of Engineering at Arizona State University. He teaches in the areas of introductory materials engineering, polymers and composites, and capstone design. His research interests include evaluating conceptual knowledge, mis- conceptions and technologies to promote conceptual change. He has co-developed a Materials Concept
educational setting could be changed, considering a range of possible educator moves or actions, hypothesizing how changes to the educational setting and/or the educator’s actions may influence shifts in the students’ engagement/learning and developing intentions and associated plans-of-action for when similar situations arise in the future (in light of salient learning goals). 4. Communicate effectively about their scholarly practice in written, oral and visual forms through a capstone project by writing a synthesis paper, building a visual poster representation of their argument, and presenting their poster publically.We prepared rubrics to track the progress of the LAs along these dimensions of learning
and engineering literacy practices within K-12 science classroom and professional communities.Ms. Noreen Balos, University of California, Santa Barbara Noreen Balos is a doctoral student in the Learning, Culture & Technology program at the University of California, Santa Barbara (UCSB). Prior to UCSB, she served as Student Affairs Officer for UCLA’s Biomedical Research minor program advising undergraduate researchers in their pursuit of MD or MD- PhD. At ASU’s School for Engineering of Matter, Transport, & Energy (SEMTE), she was a Project Manager, overseeing with CO-PIs, an NSF Innovation through Institutional Integration (Iˆ3) grant col- laborating with academic departments such as mathematics, physics
increased from the new courses approach to teaching its core topics. References[1] D. R. S.-M. Dr. Afsaneh Minaie. "Capstone Projects in a Computer Engineering Program Using Arduino," 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. New Orleans, 2016, pp.[2] D. S. G. N. Dr. Jose Antonio Riofrio. "Teaching Undergraduate Introductory Course to Mechatronics in the Mechanical Engineering Curriculum Using Arduino," 120th ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. Atlanta, GA, 2013, pp.[3] D. Y. E. Dr. Warren Rosen, Mr. M. Eric Carr. "An Autonomous Arduino-based Racecar for First-Year Engineering Technology Students," 121st ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. Indianapolis, IN, 2014
of Mechanical Engineering and Mechanical Engineering Technology at Eastern Washington University. He teaches courses in the areas of Robotics, Mechanics, Thermodynam- ics, Fluids, CAD, and Capstone Design.Dr. Donald C. Richter, Eastern Washington University DONALD C. RICHTER obtained his B. Sc. in Aeronautical and Astronautical Engineering from The Ohio State University, M.S. and Ph.D. in Engineering from the University of Arkansas. He holds a Professional Engineer certification and worked as an Engineer and Engineering Manger in industry for 20 years before teaching. His interests include project management, robotics /automation, Student Learning and Air Pollution Dispersion Modeling
students connect to industry partners through theincorporation of a real-world project embedded into their full-year capstone (senior design)course. These projects, over the span of three years, have provided students with relevantindustry examples to problem solve and connect curriculum to career. They have also offeredstudents industry-based experiences to add to their resumes, and facilitated informal mentoringand networking opportunities with several local, national and international corporate partners. Insome instances, these partners have recruited students for future internships and/or jobs,particularly after working with them on these projects.3. AssessmentA survey was conducted to assess the impact of these initiatives. Current students
available for assistance, the students are encouraged to discuss and get help from their peers when they encounter difficulties.• Design for Manufacture Communication Requirement (CR) As a capstone requirement for the DFM class, students are required to demonstrate their ability to effectively communicate on a drawing the specifications of a part with GD&T. Drawings must be generated using only the annotations input on the 3D model. This requirement ties into their final project where teams of three to four students must design a part that is to be fabricated using different manufacturing strategies (one per team member e.g. machining, die-casting, forming, forging), and compared based on cost to find where breakeven
engineering educators creates Capstone experiences that are of intellectualinterest to the undergraduate student.Research Conducted by CSU Research TeamsThis multidisciplinary effort is aimed at conducting research related to cellulosic materialsderived from a variety of resources for polymer fabrication, characterization, and application toengineering materials manufactured from natural products. It is of significant interest to theCSU community as a focus area for land grant research currently funded by agencies such asNational Science Foundation Research Experience for Teachers (NSF-RET) and the UnitedStates Department of Agriculture (USDA). In the past two years, four CSU research teams haveworked on natural product related projects.7 Each team
electives throughout their sophomore and junior years like"Healthcare Innovation by Engineering" that deepen their understanding of healthcaretechnology, policy, and needs, and can participate in clinical or industry immersion experiences.These classes and experiences culminate in their capstone design project, which they plan intheir junior year and complete in their senior year. Future WorkMoving forward, we aim to come closer to solving the health challenges that will shape thetracks in our curriculum and implement these challenges into faculty-led communities of practicethat are integrated into the project-based curriculum. The health challenges in these communitieswill be the point of integration for co-curricular, research, and core
Paper ID #17683MAKER: Smart Lighting Module for Teaching High School Science and En-gineering Students about Programmable Logic ControllersMr. William H. Heeter, My name is Bill Heeter. I have been teaching pre-Engineering classes now for fifteen years. I have taught four different Project Lead the Way classes. Currently, I am certified to teach three PLTW curriculum’s and I am a past ”Master Teacher” for Engineering Design and Development, the capstone PLTW curricu- lum. I taught several non-PLTW classes including Manufacturing Engineering and AC/DC. I also taught a Petroleum Engineering curriculum. I graduated from Texas