engineering, K-12 engineering, and engineering curriculum development.Dr. Marisa K. Orr, Clemson University Marisa K. Orr is an Assistant Professor in Engineering and Science Education with a joint appointment in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at Clemson University. Her research interests include student persistence and pathways in engineering, gender equity, diversity, and academic policy. Dr. Orr is a recipient of the NSF CAREER Award for her research entitled, ”Empowering Students to be Adaptive Decision-Makers.” c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 The WISER Experience: Perceived Supports Embedded in a Living-Learning
thenumber of African American, and Hispanic individuals becoming Science andEngineering professionals when compared to non-Hispanic Whites and Asians [3]. Thishas been linked to the disparities in exposure to technology both in the home andschool [4].Panelist 1 – Provides equal and equitable opportunities for underrepresented ethnicminorities and students with marginalized identitiesThe Cockrell School of Engineering at the University of Texas (UT) at Austinestablished the Equal Opportunity in Engineering (EOE) Program in 1970 to promotethe recruitment and academic development of African American, Hispanic, and NativeAmerican students interested in pursuing careers in engineering. Since that time, EOEhas expanded its goals and now seeks to increase
Paper ID #242382018 CoNECD - The Collaborative Network for Engineering and ComputingDiversity Conference: Crystal City, Virginia Apr 29Penn State Engineering Mentoring for Internship Excellence (EMIX): ”Gen-erating Strategic Corporate Partnerships to Catalyze Professional Success forWomen Engineers”Ms. Cheryl L. Knobloch, The Pennsylvania State University CHERYL KNOBLOCH is a ceramic engineer by academic preparation and early technical career. As a higher education professional for more than 20 years, Cheryl initiated her Penn State engineering re- search role in 1997; her career focus shifted in 2002 through her appointment as
-studentrelationships, benefits of underrepresented student organizations, problems with advising, lackof communication of School of Engineering policies, procedures, and initiatives, and finally,excessive expectations of student organizations to improve the student experience.The six recommendations of the report highlighted concrete steps the school could enact toimprove the environment for all students. 1. Create a Center for Engineering Diversity – dedicated to working with minority engineering students. The goals of the center would include: a. Increase the diversity of students who apply, enroll, and graduate from the School of Engineering, b. Increase awareness of engineering careers by underrepresented groups
deficit growing invarious STEM fields. The need for scientists is growing beyond the rate of scientists enteringthe career market, and the promotion of these underrepresented students may help fill this void[4]. The current research intends to predict the academic performance of early engineeringmajors based on student beliefs and feelings about their education in addition to academicpreparation during high school. Prior research has demonstrated a correlation between low-income individuals and specific psychological beliefs that are relevant to student success: lowerself-efficacy [5], fixed mindsets [6], and a lack of sense of belonging in academia [7] are allinstrumental in understanding the underrepresentation of low-income students in
. Thomas served as the Virginia Community College System’s director for statewide Workforce Investment Act programs. She also served as Director of Capacity Building for the Cameron Foundation, and Deputy Director at the Crater Regional Workforce Investment Board in Petersburg, Vir- ginia. Over the course of her career, Dr. Thomas’ work has generated grants and contracts totaling more than $1.5 million.She was named a Southeastern Council of Foundations Hull Fellow, keynote speaker at the Virginia Career Coach Academy and Commencement Address speaker at Fortis College, Richmond, VA. In February of 2013, she received the Living Legacy Award from the Association for the Study of African American Life and History. She
various field in engineering for over 30 years. Aimee received her degrees in Mechanical Engineering and Masters in Business Administration from Ohio State. She began her career as a packaging equipment engineer at Procter and Gamble, then moved to Anheuser-Busch where she worked for over 27 years. She worked as project manager, engineering manager, utility manager, maintenance manager, and finally as the Resident Engineer managing all technical areas of the facility. During her tenure, the brewery saw dramatic increases in productivity improvement, increased use of automation systems, and significant cost reductions in all areas including utilities where they received the internal award for having the best utility
4 10. K-12 – Schools, Teachers, Administrators, Districts 11. Parents 12. American Citizens 13. Media 14. Other – stakeholder not specified Actions suggested to “Help girls recognize their career-relevant skills.” Recommendation broaden participation “Improve access to all postsecondary education” in in STEM. “Changing the context of test-taking to eliminate stereotype threat.” Decade in which 1. 1970 recommendations 2. 1980
strategic partnerships. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018Social Enterprise Model for a Multi-Institutional Mentoring Network for Women in STEMSTEM-UP PA was launched through an NSF-ADVANCE (Increasing the Participation andAdvancement of Women in Academic Science and Engineering Careers) grant with the missionof supporting academic women in STEM from a consortium of teaching-focused institutions inthe central Pennsylvania region. Unlike many ADVANCE grants awarded to large researchinstitutions, STEM-UP PA brings together women from teaching-focused regional colleges anduniversities who face similar challenges but are isolated in their small STEM departments. Thispaper focuses on the establishment and
high school and then considerpursuing a technology-related field in college. In the place of longitudinal data, researchers haveoften relied upon one-time measures meant to predict persistence with no follow-up evidence ofhow students’ intentions actually played out. In our study we examined how survey responses byhigh school girls predicted persistence three years later defined as being tech and computerscience majors [or minors] in college. We also examined other factors that may be influential inthat choice of major. A number of studies exploring field persistence from education to career have used theSocial Cognitive Career Theory (SCCT) model which holds that personal, behavioral, andenvironmental factors play a role in career decision
engineering self-efficacy (ESE). Students were asked to indicate frequency oftypes of interactions with faculty (e.g., discuss plan of study; discuss future career plans)and extent to which they experienced negative attitudes from faculty. Engineering self-efficacy (e.g., succeed in engineering curriculum; excel in engineering major) was assessedusing items from a published instrument on engineering self-efficacy, and the scaledemonstrated internal consistency. Overall, students who reported more frequentinteractions with faculty (more than once), and lower perceived negative attitudes fromfaculty indicated higher levels of engineering self-efficacy. Further, we examined resultsfor sub-groups of specific underrepresented students (women; transfer
images that show diverse people workingtogether on interesting projects, and emphasize the wide variety of careers in computing. Provide“talking points” for those who come in contact with prospective majors, such as advising and2 NCWIT’s NEXT Award recognize ES-UP client institutions for excellence in successfully implementing ES-UPrecommended strategies and demonstrating sustained progress in increasing the representation of women in theirundergraduate computing programs. 6 Recruiting and Retaining Womenadmissions personnel, and make sure they understand and can effectively communicate about thereality of computing and the
. Allie Parrott Lora Leigh Chrystal Iowa State UniversityA WiSE approach: Examining how service-learning impacts first-year women in STEM 2 Introduction Women are drawn to science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) fields with apurpose to “change the world” and the opportunity to engage in a meaningful STEM experiencesearly in their academic career can serve as a strong recruitment and retention tool (Carlone &Johnson, 2007). Service-learning is one vehicle to offer intentional, high impact, and meaningfulexperiences for students in STEM. Service-learning provides a space for students to
-Development Activities These activities are designed to build professional skills.Many are led by UD faculty or staff. For example, UD COE faculty have hosted WIE brown-baglunches on topics including communicating in the STEM workplace, handling rejected papers orproposals, implicit bias, and impostor syndrome. We have collaborated with our university’sOffice of Career Services to provide workshops on preparing professional resumes andinterviewing for jobs. We have partnered a number of times with UD’s Office of InternationalStudents and Scholars (OISS) to provide a workshop for international students on the visaprocess after they graduate1. Finally, while most WIE activities are focused on grad students, wehave assembled panels for undergraduates on
technicaleducation relates to their future career goals. In addition, students who receive and are successfulin these experiences are better able to overcome the marginalization and isolation that is inherentin current STEM programs, and are better positioned to mentor and support other URMs tosuccessfully complete their course of study. Roper [3] states that students that attend a HistoricallyBlack College (HBCU) are more likely to earn a STEM degree because of these pre-existingstructures of community and support. Gandara, et al. [4] also found that minority engineering programs and/or universities thatare more highly effective were typically smaller. However, because of their smaller size, theseprograms may not be able to create a critical mass of
research interest focuses on changing the deficit base perspective of first-generation college students by providing asset-based approaches to understanding this population. Dina is interested in understand- ing how first-generation college students author their identities as engineers and negotiate their multiple identities in the current culture of engineering.Dr. Allison Godwin, Purdue University-Main Campus, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Allison Godwin, Ph.D. is an Assistant Professor of Engineering Education at Purdue University. Her research focuses what factors influence diverse students to choose engineering and stay in engineering through their careers and how different experiences within the practice and
built from the constructsof recognition, interest, and performance/competence is strongly predictive of the choice of acomputing career [20]. These findings are still under review and therefore mentioned asrecognition of work in progress in this space. However, all references to the role of identity inpersistence will largely be from the body work established in STEM identity. Figure 1. Computing Identity Framework4 DATA AND METHODSThe data was collected as part of a large National Science Foundation (NSF) funded project,[title and grant number blinded for anonymity], geared towards enhancing the educationalexperiences of high-achieving underserved students in Florida. The project focuses onsupporting first year
Professor in Industrial and Manufac- turing Engineering at Cal Poly, SLO. In her current role she overseas Engineering Students Services and diversity effort in the college. Coming from a 24 year career of practicing innovative pedagogies from Project based learning to flipped classrooms, she now works to transform the institution of high education through structures and practices.Dr. Jane L. Lehr, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo Jane Lehr is Chair of the Women’s & Gender Studies Department and a Professor in Ethnic Studies at California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo. She is also the Faculty Director of the Cal Poly Louis Stokes Alliance for Minority and Underrepresented
and underrepresented group in STEM fields. Recently, she has been investigating the intersec- tion of education and career path with cultural identity and is developing strategies to inform programming and policies that facilitate recruitment and retention of underrepresented populations in academia. In 2012 Dr. Zurn-Birkhimer was presented with an Outstanding Alumni Award from the Department of Earth, At- mospheric, and Planetary Sciences at Purdue University. She also serves on their Alumni Advisory Board. Dr. Zurn-Birkhimer earned her B.S. in Mathematics from the University of Minnesota, and an M.S. and Ph.D. in Atmospheric Science from Purdue University.Rachel Ann Baker c American
central evaluation questions addressed by the evaluation were as follows: 1. What do youth learn about the design process and engineering through participation? 2. How does participation in the program influence youth attitudes towards STEM in general and engineering in particular? 3. How does participation in the program influence youth plans for future college and career?ProgramDesignThe TechHive program was designed to create a culture of HOMAGO (Hang Out, Mess Around& Geek Out) for participants. HOMAGO was initially developed as a theory of how youthinteract with new media, using it to “hang out” and extend their friendships, “mess around” toexplore their interests and tinker, and “geek out” by diving deeply into
to these disparities.At Seattle University, if we analyze all students who matriculated between 2002 and 2010, and who atsome point in their academic career were enrolled in an engineering program, we find that only 19.5%identified as female, and only 9.3% identified as URM.Seattle University’s mission and values statement includes a commitment to the importance of diversityin educational excellence. While we have seen an increase in the percentages of female- and URM-identifying students entering our engineering programs over recent years, there is still much progress tobe made before we will reach a state of equality.A recent grant from the Boeing Company provides resources to address the barriers to access andsuccess currently faced by
well as experienced professionals. A seasoned leader and former high school special education teacher, Meeropol reorganized and restructured NSBE’s Programs Division to reflect strategic priorities and make better use of resources. Through its programming, NSBE strives to increase the number of black engineers graduating from college each year and to make Engineering a mainstream word in homes and communities of color. Prior to NSBE, Meeropol served as Assistant Superintendent for Postsecondary & Career Education for the District of Columbia.c American Society for There he oversaw theEngineering $35M/year Education
other resources as needed Career Counseling and resources to help students secure internships in industry Mentoring and research opportunities with faculty A supportive community of peers, faculty and staff ScholarshipsApproach to Address Working withUnderrepresented Organizations Continued –Corporate Funding Model for a Bridge Program This approach is based on “best practice” from STEM programs across the nation. The requested funds will be used for staff support and other program costs.Alumni Mentoring Program Our DDC worked with local Cleveland Engineering Society and University Alumni office to identify potential Mentors We invited students to attend based on faculty/staff recommendation and
]. Further, the lack of access andinclusion begins much earlier than the college level. Traditionally, access to pre-collegeengineering education programming in classrooms could be described as limited and sporadic,with most such programs in extra-curricular or summer programming [16]–[19]. Such programsare important but depend on students being able to access them and may not be sustained overmore than a few weeks’ time. Thus, issues of access and exclusion in engineering can begin inK-12 education: students without access to such programming have had less opportunity todevelop an engineering identity, defined here as relating to, “…[students] earliest conceptions ofengineering and potential career aspirations and how these conceptions and
engineering education,and embody diversity from the perspective of gender, international identity, career stage,underrepresented minority status, and first-generation. We will present salient features fromeach pathway that connect to potential recommendations for advancing recruitment and retentionefforts in engineering. We will also highlight themes across each pathway in the context offrameworks that represent the college experience, and conceptualizing value within a system.IntroductionThe topic of diversity and inclusion has been a longstanding topic of exploration with theengineering education community. From the onset and over a century long period, societal needshave influenced the evolution of the engineering education field and the field in
gradeandtheirperceptionsofengineering? MechanicalEngineers Hollands Career Centerhttp://www.utsa.edu/careercenter/images/riasec/riasec.png http://www.onetonline.org PreliminaryResults:InterestFit of Personal Interests and Perceptions of Engineering Survey (F-PIPES) 3.00 2.90 2.80 2.70 2.60 All Students 2.50 2.40 2.30 2.20 2.10 2.00 Realistic Investigative Artistic Social Enterprising Conventional Interests (N=715) 2.57 2.55 2.50 2.80 2.63 2.42 Perceptions (N=653
underrepresented in STEM careers. Prior to joining Howard, she served as a Research Fellow at the American Association of University Women (AAUW) and a postdoctoral researcher at the American Society for Engineering Education. Dr. LeSure worked as an engineer for over a decade before switching gears and devoting her time and talents to focus on pertinent issues, including STEM education, equity and inclusion initiatives in education and the STEM workforce, and corporate development and training. She is also the founder and Executive Di- rector of Engineers for Equity - a mission-driven organization focused on fostering equity and inclusion in engineering. Dr. LeSure earned a Ph.D. in Engineering Education at Utah State
%, and 4) for at least the last half centuryin the United States, health services baccalaureate degree programs have exhibited the highestfemale-concentration relative to other degree programs. Hence, the climate for male studentswishing to pursue a career in health services is an ideal comparison to be made to female studentsin engineering.For the purpose of this study, gender-balanced departments were defined as having female studentenrollment between 33 % and 67 % (between one third and two third) of the total enrollment inthat department. Six such departments were selected for this study with three from STEM fieldshoused in the College of Math and Science (CSM), i.e. Biology, Chemistry, and Math, andremaining three from non-STEM fields that
queer students. We spent summer2017 interviewing these people, including three administrators from the Dean of StudentsOffice, one Associate Dean of First-Year Programs, two from the Office of MulticulturalAffairs, one from Career Services, two from Student Counseling Services, one fromResidence Life, and two faculty. We also interviewed two transgender students who haddone a junior-year research project on support for transgender students, and one non-identifying student who was responsible for bringing a queer poet to campus for BlackHistory Month. During the months of August-December 2017 we continued ourinterviews, reaching 2 LGBTQ alumni. We will continue interviewing LGBTQengineering majors and alumni during spring 2018.Focus group: We
for college-wide diversity that includes having representatives from the Office ofAdmission involved, the two-week Summer Bridge experience, and GoldShirt curriculum.Components of the Summer Bridge program include fall course placement, orientation tocollege life, learning technical skills, creating shared core values, interdependent learning andcreating close friendships. The academic performance of the first cohort of EngineeringGoldShirt students was very good with a median grade point average of 3.44 at the end of theirfirst year. Student feedback was also gathered and presented as related to three goals: (1)increasing engineering student interest and knowledge of an engineering career; (2) building asense of community among GoldShirt