engineering self-efficacy (ESE). Students were asked to indicate frequency oftypes of interactions with faculty (e.g., discuss plan of study; discuss future career plans)and extent to which they experienced negative attitudes from faculty. Engineering self-efficacy (e.g., succeed in engineering curriculum; excel in engineering major) was assessedusing items from a published instrument on engineering self-efficacy, and the scaledemonstrated internal consistency. Overall, students who reported more frequentinteractions with faculty (more than once), and lower perceived negative attitudes fromfaculty indicated higher levels of engineering self-efficacy. Further, we examined resultsfor sub-groups of specific underrepresented students (women; transfer
assembled in AY17 and empowered to work with collegeleadership to envision, develop, and resource infrastructure and communication needs to engageall college employees in our culture change process. The work of the Change Team has emergedas essential to advancing our goals in relation to community. We will discuss inception andevolution of the Change Team, profile five projects launched in AY18, and summarize some ofthe challenges that still remain.BackgroundThe efforts described in this paper are enabled to a great extent by the broader university-levelcontext. The most important initiatives supporting work within the College of Engineering(COE) are highlighted below. We also provide a brief overview of the college’s strategic plan,which for the
addition, the SOE along with Science faculty ran a pilot workshop in the fall onways of teaching for diversity and inclusion. This workshop was based on the Bryn MawrCollege Teaching to Increase Diversity and Equity in STEM (TIDES) workshop. To encouragefaculty to attend future workshops on diversity and equity, the SOE had a raffle for staff andfaculty who took the implicit bias tests found at the Harvard site: Project Implicit:https://implicit.harvard.edu/implicit/takeatest.html.The formal response addressed each of the students’ recommendations. In some cases, wewere able to inform the students of activities already in process of which they were unaware. Inothers, we shared plans to address their issues, and in one case, we had to redirect some
Graduate Student Steering Committee at the University of DelawareAbstractThe University of Delaware (UD) has had an active Women in Engineering (WIE) program sincethe early 2000s. The goal of WIE is to foster a warm climate in which all members of theCollege of Engineering feel welcomed and can be productive. WIE activities have evolved overthe years, but in the last decade most of the programming has been planned and executed by theWIE Graduate Student Steering Committee. Sponsored by the dean of engineering and overseenby an associate dean and faculty advisor, the committee is made up of two women graduate-student representatives from each of the seven engineering departments. The committee planssocial, networking, and
women are under-represented.INTRODUCTIONExtension Services for Undergraduate Programs (ES-UP) at the National Center for Women &Information Technology (NCWIT) employs a multi-pronged, systemic approach to increasing theenrollment and retention of women in undergraduate computing departments. ES-UP advocatesimproving the environment for all students using research-based strategies that correspond to thesix components of the NCWIT ES-UP Systemic Change Model. The components include creatinga Recruiting Strategic Plan; retaining students with Inclusive Pedagogy, Curriculum, and StudentSupport; securing appropriate Institutional Policies and Support; and finally, implementing acomprehensive Evaluation and Tracking System (See Figure 1.)Figure 1
semester), we are now expanding this into a 4-credit SocialWorld course at UMass Amherst. Section 2 of this paper describes the first offering of the course duringSpring 2016; section 3 describes the second offering during Fall 2016, where changes were made in theschedule based on student feedback and instructor experience. Section 4 describes the logic and plan toimplement this course as a 4 credit course in the future. Section 5 offers conclusions, and references are givenin section 6. The appendices to this paper reproduce verbatim comments that students have provided abouttheir experiences in this course.2. First Course Offering: One Credit Seminar, Spring 2016 Queer Lights was initially developed in
will also be explored during this Module. 2Module IV – ConclusionTo conclude this presentation, a summary of the three most significant lessons learned fromthe AAC&U TIDES initiative will be reviewed. Of particular importance is the inclusion of insightsinto which elements of TIDES can and should be adapted within other institutions’ settings.Additionally, in keeping with its interactive approach, this presentation will invite attendees tonot only ask questions, but to also share their individual experiences, successes, and challengesrelated to implementing culturally responsive undergraduate teaching strategies.A direct outcome of the Conclusion Module will be an agreed-upon plan for
focused on student success research and policies. Dr. Rincon holds a B.S. in Civil Engineering from The University of Texas at Austin, an MBA and an M.S. in Information Management from Arizona State University, and a Ph.D. in Educational Policy and Planning from The University of Texas at Austin. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 A Descriptive Study of Community College Transfers in Engineering and Computer Science in TexasAbstractCommunity colleges are an increasingly popular route towards a baccalaureate degree, offeringopen enrollment policies, flexible schedules, and opportunities to address gaps in academicpreparation. Unfortunately, research has
primary role is to coordinate data collection, interpretation and dissemination to support teaching and learning, planning and decision-making across the college.Prof. TJ Tsai, Harvey Mudd College TJ Tsai completed his BS and MS in electrical engineering at Stanford University in 2006 and 2007. From 2008 to 2010, he worked at SoundHound, a startup that allows users to search for music by singing, humming, or playing a recorded track. He completed his Ph.D. at the University of California Berkeley in May 2016, and is now an assistant professor of engineering at Harvey Mudd College. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018Erasing a Gender Gap in Performance in a Multidisciplinary
University in the Industrial and Man- ufacturing Systems Engineering Department. He graduated in 1999 from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign with a PhD. in Industrial Engineering in the Human Factors Program. His research interests focus on human factors, human-computer interaction, and adaptive systems that enable people to be effective in the complex and often stressful environments found in aviation, military, robotic, and space applications. His teaching methods include team projects and the application of team-based learning methods into the classroom.Cassandra DoriusJane Rongerude PhD, Department of Community and Regional Planning, Iowa State University Jane Rongerude is an assistant professor in the
staff. The paper concludes with implementablesuggestions for how to fully engage the lesbian, gay, bisexual, queer, and others (LGBQ+)population in the ASEE Dean’s Diversity Initiative. IntroductionIn 2011, the ASEE Diversity Committee was formed and charged with developing a strategicplan “to position the Society to increase diversity in the profession” [2, Sec. Strategic Plan]. InOctober 2011, National Academy of Engineering member Dr. Lynn Conway appeared on thePrism magazine’s cover to accompany an article titled, “Secrets are out: Lesbian, gay, bisexual,and transgender engineers are no longer willing to hide their true selves” [3]. Dr. Conway was aformer IBM engineer who made significant
Invisible Key actor in Diversity Planning Efforts in Higher Education," Planning for Higher Education Journal, V44N4 July-September {kjfnbvnbvbv{ 2016 [online]. Available www.scup.org/phe. [Accessed Nov. 8, 2017] • [3] The National Academies Press, "Expanding Underrepresented Minority Participation: America's Science and Technology Talent at the Crossroads," [online]. Available http://nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=12984. [Accessed Nov. 8, 2017]Contact InformationSandra English, Sr. ManagerCenter for Engineering Experiential Learnings.l.english@csuohio.eduAnnette Karlsson, Dean for Washkewicz College of Engineeringa.karlsson@csuohio.eduHannah Rosen, Coordinator Engineering Student Programs
social change. These changes will require pre-existing leaders and also produce more leaders in the long run. When I graduate college, I plan to create a scholarship for women in STEM fields. This scholarship is just one little stepping stone that will be a piece of a much larger movement I plan to lead which will one day break the unfavorable norms for women in STEM majors.A WiSE approach: Examining how service-learning impacts first-year women in STEM 12Olivia helps communicate how we need to help current leaders shift to process-orientedleadership and continue to enhance future leaders in activism and positive social change. Sheclearly states her goals to make change within her major and field
community of interest. Employing a targeted approach to outreach,NSBE must recognize both national and local barriers to provide engineering experiences that areaccessible and engaging for their target audience. Central to NSBE’s outreach approach is a four-stage strategic plan, including: (1) city identification, (2) school/site identification, (3)advertisement and marketing, and (4) selection and enrollment. While many of these strategies arecommon among outreach programs, increasing access requires an additional layer of planning inwhich stakeholders must not only identify what approaches to implement, but also how best toimplement them based upon the target population. In the following sections, we will provide anoverview of each stage and
? race/ethnicity), conference information, and motivation for attending a non-technical conference. Selection of awardees wasB. Data Collection and Assessment Instruments student level-blind (graduate or undergraduate), race/ethnicity- This study presents data collected during a span of two years, blind, and based on responses to three questions: (1) Pleasewith four collection periods: Spring 2016, Fall 2016, Spring indicate why you would like to attend the conference(s), (2)2017, and Fall 2017. For each collection period, participants Please indicate how you plan to fully utilize the conference(s)completed an application form, conference pre-survey, and
about the experience at the event center: “Disney in our town… The guy was really cool who met Presidents, and rocks stars, not a stereotypical engineer.” “Interesting to learn more about the (event center) and to be able to use engineering with planning. It shows me that we can use our degree for more than just engineering.” “I would love that job - Take away. Gave me a new side to what my degree can do.” “It is a new experience to consider. Yes! It allowed me to experience more in an engineering career field so I would know what I would potentially be doing.” When classes began, student availability was more limited, which posed some challenges. The next tour was a short walk by the students to the
central evaluation questions addressed by the evaluation were as follows: 1. What do youth learn about the design process and engineering through participation? 2. How does participation in the program influence youth attitudes towards STEM in general and engineering in particular? 3. How does participation in the program influence youth plans for future college and career?ProgramDesignThe TechHive program was designed to create a culture of HOMAGO (Hang Out, Mess Around& Geek Out) for participants. HOMAGO was initially developed as a theory of how youthinteract with new media, using it to “hang out” and extend their friendships, “mess around” toexplore their interests and tinker, and “geek out” by diving deeply into
completion of their plans of study, and act to ensure intellectual health ofthe student (Noy & Ray, 2012). Solem, Lee, and Schlemper (2013), in a study of graduatestudents in a geography program, found that students reported the need for faculty advisors to aidthem with the “publish or perish” culture and climate evident in graduate education.Additionally, Cress (2008) found that, especially for underrepresented minority graduatestudents, the faculty-student relationship plays an important role in mitigating the negativeeffects of a poor campus climate. Beyond the roles and responsibilities of a faculty advisor, the interactions andrelationship between the student and advisor impacts students’ perceptions of climate andsuccess in their
helps us define what we do,explain why we invest in leader development, and shows how we do it consistentlyacross the corps of cadets during the 200-week experience. The LEAD frameworkenables the transformation of cadets from freshman into service-ready ensigns who areLeaders of Character. 2Diversity CouncilsCGA also works to ensure our leaders are developed in an inclusive and supportiveenvironment. This environment is cultivated through diversity councils supported by theOffice of Inclusion and Diversity and is comprised of members of the Cadet Corps. Perthe Coast Guard Academy’s Strategic Plan to “Cultivate a Supportive and InclusiveEnvironment”, the councils seek to promote a culture of respect
similarities intheir views may be due to their experiences in mechanical engineering as opposed to theirexperiences in WISER or Clemson University. For this reason, we recruited five students with avariety of majors and ethnicities.Study DesignThis qualitative study consisted of one interview with three parts for each participant. Questionswere centered around the best and worst experiences the students have had thus far, availabilityand use of resources within and outside of WISER, feelings about being female in science andengineering fields, and future career plans. The interviews lasted for about 30 minutes each. Theinterviews were semi structured, which allowed for impromptu probing questions whennecessary.AnalysisAfter each interview had been
Paper ID #240942018 CoNECD - The Collaborative Network for Engineering and ComputingDiversity Conference: Crystal City, Virginia Apr 29Quantitative Analysis of Barriers to Completion of Engineering Degrees forFemale-Identifying and Under-Represented Minority StudentsNancy Mariano, Seattle University Nancy Mariano is a first generation college student, of Pacific Islander heritage, attending Seattle Uni- versity. She is currently majoring in Computer Science and minoring in Mathematics and is scheduled to graduate in June 2018. Upon graduation her plans are to spend two years gaining industry experience as a software engineer
emphasis in Public Policy and Administration from Boise State University. Her thesis was entitled, ”Nanomanufacturing Outside of the Lab: An Academic-Industry Partnership Case Study.” She also re- ceived her B.S. in Materials Science & Engineering from Boise State in 2014. In the Spring of 2016, Ann was recognized as part of the first cohort of University Innovation Fellows at Boise State, and has worked as a Fellow to collect and incorporate student feedback into future plans for makerspaces on the Boise State campus. As an undergraduate and graduate student, she has been involved with the Society of Women Engineers, and also taught a materials science laboratory course as a graduate teaching assis- tant. She has
,BestPracticesandQualitativeDataCultivating225EMIXinternswith15sponsorsovertwelveyearshasyieldedbestpracticestoeffectivelynavigatethechallengesinherentlypresentinthecomplexEMIXinitiative.Anarray of complexities potentially impacts intern success and retention including studenthousing,transportation,andgeographicculture.Practitioners should be forewarned that it can be a challenge to identify appropriatehousinginasafelocationthatwillacceptanaffordableshort‐termlease.Asimportantly,notallinternshiplocationsfeaturepublictransportation,andmanystudentinternsdonothave access to a vehicle. It is advised to inquire about transportation during the studentinterviewprocesstofacilitatetransportationplanningforinterns.Lastly, it can be a challenge to attract a young professional to a very rural geographiclocation unless the company plans to orchestrate weekend activities. It is not necessarythat the location be urban, but undergraduate interns
) together for the three quarters of their firstyear. The students were notified of their placement in the cohort and encouraged to studytogether, but there was no enforcement or expectation to do so. Surveys are planned to gaugemarkers like GPA, change of major, sense of belonging, how much they connected with orcollaborated with their cohort. It is hoped that since this cohort requires minimal intervention orstaff support, this might be a low-cost retention tool. Figure 3 shows the design of courses thesestudents are taking together.Figure 3. A schematic of the degree program cohort scheduling pilot for 3 different majors forfirst year engineering students.Impacting other engineering students with Engineering Success CoursesBy virtue of the NSF
are conducted by phone and the committee meets in person once a year to pairthe next cohort of mentors and mentees and to plan the year’s orientation and core workshopevents. The approximate time commitment to serve on the Executive Committee is 25 hoursannually for members and about 50 hours annually for the Chair.Matching Mentoring PairsOne of the primary duties of the Executive Committee is to match the mentoring pairs. Afterlearning from several cohorts, it has worked best to gather applications using SurveyMonkeyduring the month of May, as faculty have some breathing room after finishing their springsemester. The application process has evolved from a lengthy multi-page pencil and papersolicitation to a simple 20-minute online survey
lines, one student said it was important to make personal connectionsand eliminate the isolation created by high engagement with social media, computers and videogames. It is necessary to be social in order to manage the high level of stress. It it is important toget out, explore campus opportunities, and engage in professional organization activities. Severalstudents emphasized that it is important to use time management to plan study, class and relaxationtime in order to maintain yourself physically, mentally, and emotionally. Some students encourageexpanding your horizon beyond your major to learn about other areas and talking to a wide arrayof people across campus. One student encouraged finding a study group with a mixture of peers,not
Ecology, Cellmisunderstandings about the functionality and and Molecular Bio, and Microbiology, proposed andorganization of their modules by members of their group. defined this project with the help of faculty advisors from The other topics that were applicable to all of the Bioinformatics and Computer Sciences. With guidance ofstudent groups, were project planning, and version control by a CS Senior research mentor, the students developed ausing git. In addition to these topics, students learned a solid prototype for this web application that is completevariety of technical approaches, such as, package with user-stories and multiple
shall conduct themselves in a manner in which all persons are treated with dignity, respect, and fairness. Engineers shall not engage in discrimination or harassment in connection with their professional activities. Engineers shall consider the diversity of the community, and shall endeavor in good faith to include diverse perspectives, in the planning and performance of their professional services. 32Recently, ABET adopted a new set of student outcomes which includes: “An ability to functioneffectively as a member or leader of a team that establishes goals, plans tasks, meets deadlines,and creates a collaborative and inclusive environment” [emphasis mine]. 33 Those of us inaccredited engineering
incollege. Central among those are student involvement and interaction with campus groups andactivities [34]. African American students, in particular first generation students, face a numberof obstacles, from the lack financial planning and knowledge about the college process tofeelings of isolation upon arrival [35]. While at home, many of these students could rely onnetworks comprised of family and friends to help them navigate life’s rough terrains [36]. Incollege and away from home, however, in particular PWIs, these students become vulnerable dueto an absent or weak supportive and familiar network. For example, McKether et al. [35]showed that African American and Latino students either withdrew from the mainstreampopulation and hung out with
management. He also has over eight (8) years of academic and academic enrichment (experiential learning) program planning, design & lead- ership experiences. A trained human factors engineer and fitness enthusiast & advocate, Dr. Woodrow W. Winchester, III brings with him a strong passion for the health & wellness space with research interests that seek to advance an understanding of consumer connected fitness technologies in improving health outcomes especially among marginalized populations. JAMEELA AL-JAROODI received the B.Sc. degree in computer science from the University of Bahrain, the M.Sc. degree in computer science from Western Michigan University, the Ph.D. degree in computer science from the