, pp. 392 – 401, 2013.[8] Aristotle. Nicomachean Ethics, second edition, translated by Terence Irwin, IN: Indianapolis, Hackett Publishing, 1999.[9] H. J. Curzer, Aristotle and the virtues. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2012.[10] R. Y.-Y. Chan and C. K. Y. Chan, “Nurturing virtuous minds in gifted engineering learners”, in Teaching Gifted Learners in STEM Subjects: Developing Talent in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics, K. S. Taber, M. Sumida, and L. McClure, L., Eds., Abingdon, Oxon, UK: Routledge, 2018, pp. 186 – 197.[11] S. L. Goldman, “Why we need a philosophy of engineering: A work in progress”, Interdisciplinary Science Reviews, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 163-176, 2004.[12] D
et. al. (1994) [27] have found that 3D solid modeling systems help enhance spatialvisualization skills in engineering graphics students. Other research involving youth aged 11 to15 has shown that the process of 3D modeling helps develop spatial awareness skills [4]. Thespatial abilities include perception of objects from different angles, mental construction andmaintenance of visuals, and rotation and changing of shapes in the mind [15], [16]. Many of themost powerful 3D modeling tools are difficult for new learners to approach due to issues likeconfusing terminology and having to deal with complex geometries. Tools like Tinkercadprovide a much low barrier to entry with fewer unfamiliar words and simpler geometry [5], [6].This in turn makes
learner.” (ID 54, File 05) Instructors: Individual (62%): -“Math is the skill that springs to mind first, but there are more skills that define a professional engineer. A “professional” has a level of expertise, responsibility, and accountability that he or she
of Tintin. London: Methuen Children's, 1992.Print.[6] Kelley, W. The Complete Idiot's Guide to Calculus, 2nd Edition. S.l.: DK, 2006. Print.[7] Pickover, Clifford A. Calculus and Pizza: A Cookbook for the Hungry Mind. Hoboken, NJ:John Wiley, 2003.[8] Averbach, Bonnie, and Orin Chein.Problem Solving through Recreational Mathematics.Mineola, N.Y.: Dover Publications, 2000.[9] Azad, Kalid. Math, Better Explained, 2014.[10] Fernandez, Oscar E. Everyday Calculus: Discovering the Hidden Math All around Us.Princeton: Princeton UP, 2014.[11] Tom Apostol, A Visual Approach to Calculus Problems, ENGINEERING & SCIENCE NO.3, 2000 http://www.mamikon.com/VisualCalc.pdf[12] www.mamikon.com[13] D. Raviv, P. Reyes and J. Baker, “A Comprehensive Step-by
students are engaged(i.e. feel they belong) they will also demonstrate intrinsic motivation, this engagement will lead to short-termand long-term positive academic outcomes. The Icarus program was structured with this theoretical framework in mind. The expectation was thatthe students that participate in Icarus, positively engage with their engineering program, and with their peers, butnot to the expense of their academic coursework. Icarus emphasized the value of the alignment between theresearch project offered, and the coursework students were enrolled in. Furthermore, we expected intrinsicmotivation in the students that participated in the voluntary research projects. In addition, we hypothesizedstudents were going to develop short
Paper ID #23155Preliminary Findings of a Phenomenological Study of Middle Eastern Women’sExperiences Studying Engineering in IrelandProf. Shannon Massie Chance, University College London & Dublin Institute of Technology Prof. Shannon Chance is a licensed architect with 18 years of experience teaching three major subjects: ar- chitecture (at Virginia Tech and Hampton University, where she was Professor of Architecture), education (at William and Mary University), and engineering (at Dublin Institute of Technology in Ireland where she serves as Lecturer in the School of Multidisciplinary Technologies). Alongside
andperhaps responsibility as working engineers, the use of reflection as a tool for making decisionsbecomes much more important. A challenge will be conveying to students this important use ofreflection, as only 8% of student respondents considered this form of use.Finally, it is important to note that remembering is a moderately important use of reflection forboth students and faculty, but not for practitioners. Keep in mind that remembering implieslooking back upon past events without actually attempting to make meaning from it. Whystudents and faculty would be more prone to use this relatively passive form of reflection isunclear. Perhaps there is something about working in industry that pushes practitioners to seereflection as a precious
Paper ID #21076Professional Development Program for Improving the Diversity of Faculty inElectrical and Computer Engineering (iREDEFINE ECE)Dr. Susan M. Lord, University of San Diego Susan M. Lord received a B.S. from Cornell University and the M.S. and Ph.D. from Stanford University. She is currently Professor and Chair of Electrical Engineering at the University of San Diego. Her teach- ing and research interests include electronics, optoelectronics, materials science, first year engineering courses, feminist and liberative pedagogies, engineering student persistence, and student autonomy. Her research has been
engineering.GEOTECHNICS MAJOR RELATED COURSESEngineering geology is so important that the father of soil mechanics Karl Terzaghi, when hetaught at University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign, it is said that he only taught theengineering geology course [16]. His teaching and emphasis on engineering geology instead ofinstruction of soil mechanics, that was created and developed by himself, shows the importanceof engineering geology in the father of soil mechanics’ mind. The introduced fundamental casestudy and explanation of the failure mechanism of the highway embankment slope movement isillustrated with the geotechnics in conjunction of both soil mechanics and engineering geologyprocesses. Most civil engineering programs offer at least one geotechnical
Paper ID #22024No-cost Implementation of Electronic Lab Notebooks in an Intro Engineer-ing Design CourseDr. Daisuke Aoyagi, California State University, Chico Daisuke Aoyagi received a B.Eng. in Mechanical Engineering from Waseda University in Tokyo, Japan, and a M.S. and a Ph.D. in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering from University of California, Irvine. He worked as a research engineer at Los Amigos Research and Education Institute in Downey, Cali- fornia. He is an assistant professor in the department of Mechanical and Mechatronic Engineering and Sustainable Manufacturing at California State University, Chico. His
scientific oral presentationMethodsConcept maps organize information graphically. They were first developed and used as apedagogical tool in biology by Stewart et al. [2]. In developing a concept map, a student writesdown terms that come to mind as the result of a prompt and connects them with directionalarrows and text describing the nature of the connections. If the concept maps are to be used toassess or evaluate student learning, the instructor must decide not only how to construct theassignment prompt but also how to evaluate the map. Per [1], in engineering education, conceptmaps have been used to assess knowledge integration across an engineering program [3],conceptual understanding in a engineering
, and learning as socio- culturally organized phenomena. A major strand of his research explores the varied trajectories taken by students as they attempt to enter professional disciplines such as engineering, and focuses on the dilem- mas encountered by students as they move through these institutionalized trajectories. He is co-editor of a 2010 National Society for the Study of Education Yearbook, Learning Research as a Human Science. Other work has appeared in Linguistics and Education; Mind, Culture, and Activity; Anthropology & Education Quarterly, the Encyclopedia of Cognitive Science; the Journal of Engineering Education; and the Cambridge Handbook of Engineering Education Research. His teaching interests
a class community is established early in the program.The format of Engineering Design Days is very similar among the different implementations. Forthe first half-day, students are presented with constrained problems strongly tied to their coursecontent. These problems serve as warm-ups, introducing the problem space and leading studentsthrough an analysis of a related but simplified system. These warm-up problems also provide anassessment opportunity that can be used as an assignment in one or more courses, whichstrengthens the links to course content in students’ minds and makes the expectation clear thatthe time is not just about having fun as a team. The next two half-days are an open work periodfor students to design, construct and
Paper ID #22619Fundamental: A Teacher Professional Development Program in EngineeringResearch with Entrepreneurship and Industry ExperiencesMr. Sai Prasanth Krishnamoorthy, New York University Sai Prasanth Krishnamoorthy received his BSEE from Amrita University and M.S in Mechatronics from NYU Tandon School of Engineering, Brooklyn, NY. He is currently a Ph.D. student in Mechanical En- gineering at NYU Tandon School of Engineering, serving as a research assistant under NSF-funded RET Site project. He conducts research in Mechatronics, Robotics and Controls Laboratory at NYU and his research interests include automation
Paper ID #21516Reactions from First-year Engineering Students to an In-depth Growth Mind-set InterventionDr. Emily Dringenberg, Ohio State University Dr. Dringenberg is an assistant professor in the Department of Engineering Education at Ohio State University. She holds a BS in Mechanical Engineering (Kansas State ’08), a MS in Industrial Engi- neering (Purdue ’14) and a Ph.D. in Engineering Education (Purdue ’15). Her research is focused on decision-making within the context of engineering design. She is working to leverage engineering edu- cation research to shift the culture of engineering to be more inclusive of
technology and society. There is aneed to reliably capture student learning about complex and dynamic socio-technical systemswithout privileging an assessment tool that a priori evaluates “more is better”. With that in mind this manuscript addresses three key issues in this area. The firstobjective, efficiency, is to interrogate the use of concept maps to capture student learning aboutthe complexity of socio-technical systems in large-scale engineering programs where a review ofeach individual map would require extensive time investments. Conducting the conceptmapping exercise and analysis strategy are impacted under this objective. This leads to thesecond objective, methodological development, which assesses how complexity can be evaluatedin
U.S. National Science Foundation’s Early Career Award in 2009. He is co-editor of the Cambridge Handbook of Engineering Education Research (CHEER) published by Cam- bridge University Press, New York, NY. Dr. Johri earned his Ph.D. in Learning Sciences and Technology Design at Stanford University and a B.Eng. in Mechanical Engineering at Delhi College of Engineering.Dr. Aqdas Malik, George Mason University Aqdas Malik is a Postdoctoral Research Fellow at the Department of Information Sciences and Tech- nology, George Mason University. His multidisciplinary academic and industry experience spans two key disciplines: Human-Computer Interaction and Social Media Communication and Analytics. He is currently engaged in a
positiveinterpersonal (such as belongingness) and intrapersonal (such as mindfulness) competencies thatcomplement the field’s traditional focus on academic competencies (such as GPA). Thisapproach to conceptualizing thriving is consistent with Seligman’s (2013) claim thatinterventions which mitigate problems differ from those that foster thriving.The purpose of this conceptual framework for engineering thriving is to take the first step indefining the competencies relevant to engineering student success, as informed by a search ofengineering education literature, review of professional reports relevant to undergraduateengineering student success, feedback from engineering education faculty and conversationswith undergraduate engineering students. As a result
Paper ID #21181Use of Active Learning and the Design Thinking Process to Drive CreativeSustainable Engineering Design SolutionsDr. Renee M. Clark, University of Pittsburgh Renee M. Clark serves as research assistant professor focusing on assessment and evaluation within the University of Pittsburgh’s Swanson School of Engineering and its Engineering Education Research Cen- ter (EERC), where her interests center on active and experiential learning as well as learner-centered instruction. She has 25 years of experience as an engineer and analyst, having worked most recently for Walgreens and General Motors/Delphi Automotive
Paper ID #21949Work in Progress - the Undergraduate Perspective: How to Survive an Un-dergraduate Engineering ProgramBryon Kucharski, Wentworth Institute of Technology Bryon Kucharski is an undergraduate Computer Engineering student from Wentworth Institute of Tech- nology who will graduate in August of 2018. After the completion of his undergraduate degree, Bryon will attend the University of Massachusetts Amherst to pursue a Master’s in Computer Science where he plans to focus on Artificial Intelligence.Prof. Aaron Carpenter, Wentworth Institute of Technology Professor Carpenter is an Assistant Professor at the Wentworth
Catherine Mobley, Ph.D., is a Professor of Sociology at Clemson University. She has over 30 years experience in project and program evaluation and has worked for a variety of consulting firms, non-profit agencies, and government organizations, including the Rand Corporation, the American Association of Retired Persons, the U.S. Department of Education, and the Walter Reed Army Institute of Research. Since 2004, she been a member of the NSF-funded MIDFIELD research project on engineering education; she has served as a Co-PI on three research projects, including one on transfer students and another on student veterans in engineering.Dr. Catherine E. Brawner, Research Triangle Educational Consultants Catherine E. Brawner is
Paper ID #22016Professional Engineering Pathways Study: The Value of a Community ofPractice to Stimulate Use of Research Findings that Inform PracticeDr. Ruth A. Streveler, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Ruth A. Streveler is an Associate Professor in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. Dr. Streveler has been the Principal Investigator or co-Principal Investigator of ten grants funded by the US National Science Foundation. She has published articles in the Journal of Engineering Education and the International Journal of Engineering Education and has contributed to the
Paper ID #21101Navigating Process-Product Tensions using a Design CanvasDr. R. Alan Cheville, Bucknell University Alan Cheville studied optoelectronics and ultrafast optics at Rice University, followed by 14 years as a faculty member at Oklahoma State University working on terahertz frequencies and engineering educa- tion. While at Oklahoma State, he developed courses in photonics and engineering design. After serving for two and a half years as a program director in engineering education at the National Science Founda- tion, he took a chair position in electrical engineering at Bucknell University. He is currently
Factors Influencing the Interest Level of Secondary Students going into STEM fields and their parents’ perceived interest in STEM (Evaluation)Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) disciplines are essential to societyand to competing in the global economy [1]. The role of STEM education has evolved fromproviding students with STEM content knowledge and understanding, to preparing students to beinterested in and committed to pursuing careers in the STEM workforce. According to thePresident’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology, “We must prepare all students,including girls and minorities, who are underrepresented in these fields, to be proficient in STEMsubjects. And we must inspire all students to learn STEM
Arizona Byron Hempel is a PhD graduate student at the University of Arizona, having received his B.S. in Chem- istry at the University of Kentucky and Masters in the Chemical and Environmental Engineering Depart- ment at the University of Arizona. Working under Dr. Paul Blowers, Byron is focusing on improving the classroom environment in higher education by working in the flipped classroom. He is a University Fellow, a Mindful Ambassador, and Chair of the Graduate Student Working Group for the ASEE Chapter at the University of Arizona. In his ”free time” he enjoys rock climbing.Ms. Christina Julianne Loera, University of ArizonaSamantha Davidson, University of ArizonaMs. Savannah Boyd, University of Arizona Graduate
ideas, which helped them to minimize evaluation of early ideas. They aimed togenerate a specific number of ideas and further used idea generation techniques such as MindMapping, Brainstorming, Design Heuristics, and Functional Decomposition to expand thepossible number of concepts. For example, Brian used Mind Mapping to come up with sub-component ideas and synthesized whole idea by combining various sub-components. Ideationtechniques helped students to come up with a larger number of ideas that varied. Currently, only a few engineering courses provide explicit instruction on promotingcreativity in idea generation and problem solving [39-42]. A common instructional method inengineering to encourage creative problem solving is through
Paper ID #22709Successfully Building a Diverse Telescope Workforce: The Design of the Aka-mai Internship Program in Hawai’iMr. Austin Barnes, Institute for Scientist and Engineer Educators Austin Barnes is a program manager with the Institute for Scientist and Engineer Educators, which is housed in the Division of Social Sciences at UC Santa Cruz. Coming from an educational background in astronomy and engineering, Austin manages the Akamai Internship Program, a seven week summer internship program in Hawai’i dedicated to retaining local undergraduate participants in science, technol- ogy, engineering, and mathematics
Paper ID #21208Engaging Children in Design Thinking Through Transmedia Narrative (RTP)Dr. Glenn W. Ellis, Smith College Glenn Ellis is a Professor of Engineering at Smith College who teaches courses in engineering science and methods for teaching science and engineering. He received a B.S. in Civil Engineering from Lehigh University and an M.A. and Ph.D. in Civil Engineering and Operations Research from Princeton Univer- sity. The winner of numerous teaching and research awards, Dr. Ellis received the 2007 U.S. Professor of the Year Award for Baccalaureate Colleges from the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teach
-Scoping/Problem Framing Problem-scoping or Problem Framing, the process by which engineers iteratively define and refine the problem, is an important part of the engineering design process but also one that requires specific skills and habits of mind. Few activities, however, are structured to help students develop these skills. Here we share three activities that were specifically developed to emphasize the problem-scoping phase of the engineering design process: The Paper Airplane Contest, the Changing Leaves Problem, and the Protecting Pelican Colonies problem. In these activities, students are presented with a client who has a rich, but ill-defined realistic problem. Students then engage in a structured
runofffrom downspouts to redirect the water from entering the sewer system, and directly into thegroundwater aquifers. The installation of a rain garden was one of many positive aspects of BCAin the students’ and parents’ minds, as it provided each student the ability to contribute totangible evidence of what they have learned and turn learning into action. Students were alsoable to come away with the notion that plants can be solutions through a combination of natureand engineering to increase efficiency.Day 5: Outdoor laboratory and BCA GraduationBCA’s last day gave the students a chance to learn from and network with a nearby highlyselective university environmental monitoring research site. The site allows researchers thecontrol of a laboratory