Paper ID #23289Crafting the Future of Computing Education in CC2020: A WorkshopDr. Stephen T Frezza, Gannon University Deacon Steve Frezza, PSEM is a professor of Software Engineering and chair of the Computer and In- formation Science department at Gannon University in Erie, PA. His research interests include Global Software Engineering, Affective Domain Learning, Engineering Education Research, as well as Philos- ophy of Engineering and Engineering Education. He is regularly involved in supporting the regional entrepreneurial ecosystem, as well as projects that serve the regional community. He is an active member
courses. She aspires to understand and improve student attitude, achievement, and persistence in student-centered courses.Mrs. Lindy Hamilton Mayled, Arizona State University Lindy Hamilton Mayled is a PhD candidate at Grand Canyon University. She is pursuing her PhD in Psychology of Learning, Education, and Technology. Her background in in K-12 education where she has served as a high school science teacher, Instructional and Curriculum Coach, and Assistant Principal. Her research and areas of interest are in improving STEM educational outcomes for Low-SES students through the integration of active learning and technology-enabled frequent feedback. She currently works as the Project Manager for the NSF faculty
that has been achieved in successfully chairing ten or more graduate student culminating projects, theses, or dissertations, in 2011 and 2005. He was also nominated for 2004 UNI Book and Supply Outstanding Teaching Award, March 2004, and nominated for 2006, and 2007 Russ Nielson Service Awards, UNI. Dr. Pecen is an Engineering Tech- nology Editor of American Journal of Undergraduate Research (AJUR). He has been serving as a re- viewer on the IEEE Transactions on Electronics Packaging Manufacturing since 2001. Dr. Pecen has served on ASEE Engineering Technology Division (ETD) in Annual ASEE Conferences as a reviewer, session moderator, and co-moderator since 2002. He served as a Chair-Elect on ASEE ECC Division
global energy crisis,but provides society with a cheap and user-friendly product is unprecedented. The skills learnedfrom this project were invaluable, as research, design, trial and error, as well as technical writingare all important experiences within engineering. This brake not only provides scientists andresearchers with more valuable information about alternative energy, but is also capable ofeducating the everyday person about the basics of engineering as well as the importance ofrenewable resources.IntroductionThis paper shares a sample project illustrating a new teaching approach via innovation. One of theobjectives of the Experiential Engineering Education1-4 and this paper is to reform engineeringeducation by moving away from the
performed many private and government projects. Dr. Fathizadeh has published numerous journal, conference and technical articles. He has been instrumental figure in establishing mechatronic engineering technology at Purdue University Northwest. His areas of interests are, control systems, power systems, power electronics, energy, and system integration. Dr. Fathizadeh is a registered professional engineer in the State of Illinois.Anan Ismail Ayyad c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Students’ Participation to Improve Formula SAE CarAbstractFormula Society of Automotive Engineers (FSAE) competition provides opportunity for studentsto enhance their engineering design and
, 2018 Using student video presentations to develop communication skillsIntroduction Communication skills continue to be one of the important professional skills that are requiredfor engineering graduates [1] that pose difficulties for engineering educators. The issues aroundthese skills include what to teach, how to teach them, and how to assess students’ abilities[2, 3]. As part of a curriculum reform project that is a component of a larger department changeeffort, three required classes of the third year curriculum of an Electrical and ComputerEngineering (ECE) program at Colorado State University have added a knowledge integrationcomponent that occurs approximately every five weeks. During these integration efforts, studentsare
Audit and Control Association. She has spoken on information security at numerous professional associ- ations, is the technical director for a global investment publication.Wayne Merrell c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Virtual Reality Education Modules for Digital Manufacturing InstructionAbstractThere is an imminent need to remedy the ‘skills gaps’ in the digital manufacturing (DM) sectoras evident from the Bureau of Labor Statistics projections pointing to a decline in traditionalmanufacturing jobs accompanied by marked growth in digital- and computer-drivenmanufacturing jobs. With proven advantages such as cost benefits, material conservation,minimized labor, and enhanced
Paper ID #21933Work in Progress: Visualizing Design Team Analytics for Representing andUnderstanding Design Teams’ ProcessDr. Corey T Schimpf, The Concord Consoritum Corey Schimpf is a Learning Analytics Scientist with interest in design research, learning analytics, re- search methods and under-representation in engineering, A major strand of his work focuses on develop- ing and analyzing learning analytics that model students’ cognitive states or strategies through fine-grained computer-logged data from open-ended technology-centered science and engineering projects. His disser- tation research explored the use of
without a laboratory. In the rare cases of existing labs, such hardware based teaching labslack the flexibility to evolve over time and adapt to different environments.Supported by a NSF TUES type II project, we have developed a series of software defined radio(SDR) based mixed signal detection laboratories for enhancing undergraduate communicationand networking curricula. In our previous NSF funded CCLI project “Evolvable wirelesslaboratory design and implementation for enhancing undergraduate wireless engineeringeducation”, we have developed and demonstrated the first nationwide example of evolvable SDRbased laboratories for three existing undergraduate courses.In this project, we are developing new lab components that can be adopted by
Engineering from Purdue University. Dr. Jordan is PI on several NSF-funded projects related to design, including an NSF Early CAREER Award entitled ”CAREER: Engineering Design Across Navajo Culture, Community, and Society” and ”Might Young Makers be the Engineers of the Future?,” and is a Co-PI on the NSF Revolutionizing Engineering Departments grant ”Additive Innovation: An Educational Ecosystem of Making and Risk Taking.” He was named one of ASEE PRISM’s ”20 Faculty Under 40” in 2014, and received a Presidential Early Career Award for Scientists and Engineers from President Obama in 2017.Ms. Courtney A. Betoney, Arizona State University, Polytechnic campus Courtney Betoney is from Ganado, Arizona and is studying
introduction to the concept of non-profit organizations and philanthropy as catalysts for social change, a series of lectures connectingvarious technical areas of engineering to their social impact, a semester-long project that examinesengineering successes and their unintended consequences, a student-driven proposal developmentand grant review process that would facilitate the selection of a non-profit organization to receivea $10,000 investment from the Neilom Foundation, and an end-of-the-semester celebration wherestudents present their projects to guests from non-profit organizations and the local community.Throughout the offering of the course, the instructional team learned that students appreciate theopportunity to be engaged in philanthropic
, knowledge, and skills to find and strengthen their own voice and to navigate critical transitions such as starting college and entering the workforce. Jordan-Bloch’s scholarly research centers on the intersection of social psychology and education, and current projects include work on: the perception of mattering as a mechanism in teacher-student relationships, the relational context of cohort-based learning, and how gender inequality is experienced and understood during critical transitions for young women. Jordan-Bloch received her B.A. in sociology from Brown University and her Ph.D. in sociology from Stanford University.Ms. Shoshanah Cohen, Stanford University Shoshanah Cohen is the Director of Community Engaged
Paper ID #215014-D Printing of Pressure Sensors and Energy Harvesting Devices for Engi-neering EducationProf. Tzu-Liang Bill Tseng, University of Texas, El Paso Dr. Tseng is a Professor and Chair of Industrial, Manufacturing and Systems Engineering at UTEP. His research focuses on the computational intelligence, data mining, bio- informatics and advanced manu- facturing. Dr. Tseng published in many refereed journals such as IEEE Transactions, IIE Transaction, Journal of Manufacturing Systems and others. He has been serving as a principle investigator of many research projects, funded by NSF, NASA, DoEd, KSEF and LMC. He
become well acquainted. Teaching assistants are not provided.A predominantly traditional approach to engineering education was the established pedagogy untilthe early 2000s. Group work was usually disconnected from technical engineering content andtended not to include engineering project work. Little formative assessment of the learning processexisted and the predominant approach relied upon summative assessments (e.g., individual end-of-semester written examinations). During the mid-2000s, some transformation in engineeringeducation occurred, with change manifested though the implementation of problem- or project-based learning (PBL) wherein the traditional curriculum began to include several ‘islands’ of PBL.For the academic year 2009/10, a
a tour of the primary structures andequipment which had been installed by a professional solar, hydroelectric power installationcontractor.The Rapid Center is a university-based research and development center. The Center’s industry-experienced faculty and staff work with business partners to address their specific needs and toremove obstacles to product commercialization and process improvement. The Rapid Centerfosters a culture of collaborative innovation that helps clients refine existing products, developnew ones and improve business practices. At the same time, the Center’s engineering andtechnology students, working with faculty mentors and course instructors, work to address real-world problems for project sponsors while they gain
to improve the information literacy instructional curricula at higher educationinstitutions, but will also provide an innovative and tested approach to evaluating theeffectiveness of instruction offered by the library. Findings from this study will be used todevelop a transferable model for information literacy instruction and assessment. Literature Review Assessing student learning from an information literacy session has always been amulti-faceted problem, depending on what the outcomes are and how engaged the students arewith those outcomes, whether during the session or in class through discussion or a project theyturn in. Other librarians using bibliographies and evaluation of citations
Louisiana State University (LSU) in energy researchto engage participating students in innovative projects related to biofuels, energy storage, andcatalysis. Participants interact with university faculty as well as local industry and entrepreneurs.Over the course of the summer, students develop a commercialization plan for their summerresearch project aided by mentors from the LSU Business & Technology Center. The combinationof local industry, entrepreneurship, and world-class research facilities and faculty offer the REUstudents an opportunity that is hard to match. In recent years the authors have discussed the uniqueopportunities available to those with graduate degrees with undergraduate chemical engineeringstudents at LSU. Through these
learning, music technology, and multimodality. He presented his work at national and international conferences such as GLS (Games + Learning + Society) and G4C (Games for Change). He is the author of the book La Quotidianit`a dell’Assurdo (The Everyday Absurd, Archetipolibri, Bologna, 2010).Mrs. Robin L. Nelson, University of Texas, San Antonio Robin Nelson is a doctoral student in the Department of Interdisciplinary Learning and Teaching and is pursuing a cognate in Instructional Technology at the University of Texas at San Antonio. Her research in- terests include the development of TPACK in preservice teachers and evidence-based teaching strategies. She is a Graduate Research Assistant for the TRESTLE project at
boundaries of traditional classroom-basedapproaches to project- concept- and team-based, and skill- and knowledge-integrated approachesusing real world situations. This new teaching approach can improve the effectiveness ofengineering education. Introducing new teaching approaches is always a challenging task andhas been explored using various tactics, and the detailed work is published in the peer reviewedjournals and proceedings8-13. For experiential energy innovation team project, we selectedmagnetism and its application to generate electricity via an innovative approach. Magnetic 1induction was discovered by Michael Faraday in the mid-19th century14
engineering student’s education in managing uncertainty in designdecisions. Our proposition is that while engineering education has advocated designmethodologies that indirectly address uncertainty and teamwork, such as the human-centereddesign approach [12, 13] and project-based service learning [14, 15], we may find a more directapproach to design, uncertainty, and teamwork outside of the engineering discipline.Research Methodology and Description of DataWe employ constructivism as the theoretical framework to explore our research question.Typically in constructivism, we consider the foundational questions “How have the people in thissetting constructed reality? What are their reported perception, ‘truths’, explanations, beliefs, andworld-view
that apply to multiple areas ofengineering (e.g., that students will understand the engineering design process), each section ofthe course may take different pedagogical approaches to achieving those outcomes. In addition,each professor selects his/her own topic and adds specific student learning outcomes to thecommon outcomes that are related to his/her area of disciplinary expertise. The sections of thecourse that serve as the foundation for the work presented in this paper are taught by facultymembers in chemical engineering, civil engineering, and mechanical engineering.The authors are motivated by a desire to understand how the different approaches faculty used inthis introductory course impact student learning. In a pilot project in fall
’ experiences and develop a futureprotocol and establish a baseline of identity and community development for FYE students. Thesurvey is part of a multi-year project, and this initial understanding will shape future interviewsallowing the impact of the FYE experience to be further explored. Ultimately, the larger studyseeks to understand the impact various decisions made regarding FYE have on community andidentity development as student move through multiple pathways. The baseline survey will guidethe development of future aspects of this project while providing insights about FYE students’communities and views of themselves.IntroductionOver the last several years, there have been calls for changes to engineering education in order toensure that
authors attended a three and one-half day meeting called theIntegrating Curriculum with Entrepreneurial-Mindset (ICE) Workshop to help students developan entrepreneurial mindset. [1] During the workshop, the authors developed a set of learningmodules focused using KEEN’s model. The student must deliver a presentation and a writtenreport focused on the entrepreneurial mindset for a digital communication course, identified asEE 463. Several Entrepreneurial-Minded Learning (EML) activities prepared students for theresearch project and report. Although the senior and adult students were exposed for the first-time to the KEEN framework, they performed tasks to foster an entrepreneurial mindset based onthe following topics covered in six of the eleven
Paper ID #22077Early-career Engineers at the Workplace: Meaningful Highs, Lows, and In-novative Work EffortsMr. Mathias J. Klenk, Technical University of Munich Mathias graduated from Technical University of Munich (TUM) with a B.Sc. ’15 and M.Sc ’17 in Man- agement and Technology. His majors were Computer Science, Innovation and Entrepreneurship. He was also a participant in the entrepreneurial qualification program ”Manage&More”. This is a program of the center for innovation and business creation at the Technical University Munich (”UnternehmerTUM”) which supports innovation and startup projects. While at
Chair ofthe Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering at Georgia Tech – Savannah. He was also the FoundingDirector of the Systems Realization Laboratory at Georgia Tech.Farrokh’s current research focus is the model-based realization of complex systems by managing uncer-tainty and complexity. The key question he is investigating is what are the principles underlying rapid androbust concept exploration when the analysis models are incomplete and possibly inaccurate? His questfor answers to the key question is anchored in three projects, namely,Integrated Realization of Robust, Resilient and Flexible NetworksIntegrated Realization of Engineered Materials and ProductsManaging Organized and Disorganized Complexity: Exploration of the Solution
Embedded in Junior Level Thermodynamics and Fluid Mechanics CoursesAbstractIn collaboration with the National Fluid Power Association (NFPA), the faculty at LawrenceTechnological University developed and implemented fluid-power based modules (i.e.,classroom exercises) for two BS Mechanical Engineering (BSME) core courses:Thermodynamics and Fluid Mechanics. The project aims to teach students the basic theories andconcepts in fluid power and expose them to real-world hydraulic and pneumatic applications.Modules designed for the Fluid Mechanics course focus on addressing hydraulics relatedapplications, and modules designed for the Thermodynamics course focus on pneumatic systems.Fluid power modules include homework to be completed
complex work of design for the first time,knowing how to plan and carry out a design project specific to their discipline, how to documentthe process, and how to make their invisible design thinking processes visible in a blank bookcan be a challenging task. Moore et al. reported on some of the challenges that students andinstructors encounter when using blank engineering notebooks, including confusion about whatshould go in the notebook, uncertainty about the purpose for keeping a design notebook, notseeing the value in careful documentation of design work, and a reluctance to engage inreflection of their design process [5]. The structured engineering design notebook described inthis paper can help support students as they build expertise in
University and Delaware State University and an adjunct Assistant Professor at the University of Pennsylvania. His research interests are in radio frequency and analog integrated circuit design, embedded systems, biomed- ical electronics, and engineering education. He received his Ph.D. in Electrical Engineering and Computer Science from MIT.Dr. Yalcin Ertekin, Drexel University (Tech.) (MERGED) Dr. Ertekin received his BS degree in mechanical engineering from Istanbul Technical University. He received MS degree in Production Management from Istanbul University. After working for Chrysler Truck Manufacturing Company in Turkey as a project engineer, he received dual MS degrees in engi- neering management and mechanical
thinking, guide development of aresearched writing piece, and as a rubric instrument to assess student critical thinking throughwriting. Student oral communication is another key outcome. A subjective rubric has beenreplaced with a transparent, straightforward, binary check sheet rubric.Another signature assignment in the course is a team-based design challenge. Evaluation ofstudent performance was difficult and subjective. Through continuous improvement built onstudent feedback we developed a transparent method of evaluating the design challenge. Wedemonstrate the effectiveness of a simple check-sheet style rubric for evaluation of demonstrateddesign thinking and project management skills in the team-based design challenge.Results of this 6-year
improve quality of life. Experience with financial auditing for state Congress, government projects, and universities in the U.S. demonstrate diverse work and skills. Mission: Global diversity and inclusion in STEM fields. Presence: U.S., Latin America, Caribbean and Asia.Ms. Denise Nicole Williams, University of Maryland, Baltimore County Denise N. Williams is a third year Chemistry PhD candidate at the University of Maryland, Baltimore County (UMBC) as a member of Dr. Zeev Rosenzweig’s nanomaterials research group. She is currently a National Science Foundation AGEP Fellow, a Meyerhoff Graduate Fellow, and a research associate of the Center for Sustainable Nanotechnology. Prior to her time at UMBC, Denise earned a