general, the commentswere focused primarily on Contributing and secondarily on Having Related Knowledge, Skills,and Abilities; not all five CATME dimensions. However, when detailed comments are given,they often provide additional insights into peer ratings and explanations for the CATMEexception codes. These insights into team functional or dysfunctional behavior provideinformation to the instructor that goes well beyond what can be obtained from the peer ratingsalone.1. IntroductionWorking in teams is widely viewed as a key skill for having a successful career. However,effective team behavior does not necessarily come naturally to many students. In engineeringeducation, developing teamwork and communication skills, among other things, are
from their competitors and prospective studentsenjoy increased access to information about various programs. Armed with this data, prospectivestudents can identify, apply to and enroll in the program that best supports their specific careergoals.Background Graduate programs in the U.S. play an important role in advancing their graduates’ careergoals. In the last 30 years, overall enrollment in graduate programs has continued to increase at arate higher than undergraduate degree enrollment, with individuals obtaining their master’sdegrees increasing 240% between 1985 and 2013 [1]. However, in the 10-year period ending in2013, obtaining a master’s degree became a “less popular” option for students. A strong U.S. andglobal economy provides
cross-disciplinary MSCE/MBA and MSCE/JD dual-degree programs. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Comparison Between the New Bodies of Knowledge for the Civil Engineering Professional and the Civil Engineering TechnologistBackgroundCivil engineering relies on a strong formal knowledge and skills base acquired largely throughhigher education and experience. Central to the identity of civil engineering as a profession isthe need for such expert knowledge and skills, independence of thought and judgment, and anethos to serve the public good grounded in a sound code of ethics [1], [2]. The American Societyof Civil Engineers (ASCE) formally endorsed the
hands-on activities to promote transformational learning strategies in STEMeducation.1. Introduction Engagement in school is one of the primary building blocks to a successful educationalsystem. Fredricks et al. preformed a literature review on the outcomes of effective engagement,finding evidence for improved achievement and lower dropout rates [1]. However, maintainingstudent engagement in the classroom has become increasingly difficult in recent years. Studentsare constantly being pulled to multi-media devices, which provide a level of entertainment that isdifficult to match in the classroom. Consequently an emphasis has been placed on developingteaching strategies to improve student engagement including Active Learning, Flipped
globalization is the internationalization ofhigher education. Governments are investing in international education and students’ mobility [1]leading to the increase of the international students’ population in U.S. universities. Among manychallenges faced by those students (related to their different cultures, languages and social habits),the most demanding are the settlement in the new environment, the adaptation of their informationprocesses and communication skills [2]. Often non-native English speakers may not feel fit orcapable to interact with their domestic counterparts in class activities.However, the implications of the internationalization of the campuses populations goes far beyondthe issues of adaptation and socialization; issues related to
demonstrated competency in two additional skills, determined as required forcontinued advanced study in dynamics. Students could demonstrate proficiency on additionalskills to earn higher grades. Each skill increased the final letter grade by 1/3 of a grade.Comparisons were made using the rate at which students demonstrated proficiency.Competency-based offerings of the course were compared to a similar group of students assessedwith a more traditional grading system (2014 offering). In the competency-based courses, >93%of the students demonstrated proficiency on the required skills, compared to 43% in thetraditional offerings (Chi-Squared p<0.01).Several aspects of course design can help foster the successful use of the competency-basedsystem of
the total HECI and their respectivesub-tests than those who used computer simulations. This same pattern was seen with conceptarea and gender.Introduction and Background Heat and temperature concepts are found at all levels in the science curricula [9] and arewell-known for creating conceptual difficulties for learners [28]. Carlton [1] found manystudents described temperature as “…a measure of how hot or cold something feels” (p. 102).Others found students believed there is no difference between heat and temperature or that heatis a form of energy [6], [7], [25], [29]. While it could be hypothesized that the more courseworktaken, the greater the conceptual understanding, Jasen and Oberem [9] found that the number ofcourses/semesters
students’ interest in this course, which also improved their performance.1. IntroductionRobotics is becoming one of the most attractive majors in the Colleges of Technology because ofthe advantages in respect of applications, jobs, and prospects. Therefore, more and more Collegesof Technology have or are planning to create robotics program. Usually, as an interdisciplinaryfield, the robotics programs are provided by either Computer Engineering Technology or MET.However, students of Engineering Technology, especially MET, are facing two dilemmas whenproviding robotics courses:(1) Technology programs mainly focus on hands-on skills and there are fewer fundamentalrobotics-related courses in the MET curriculum than in electrical engineering
, and computer science;therefore observing responses of graduate and senior undergraduate students to Taylor series questions appears to be theinitial step for understanding students’ conceptual cognitive reasoning. These observations help to determine and develop asuccessful teaching methodology after weaknesses of the students are investigated. Pedagogical research on understandingmathematics and conceptual knowledge of physics majors’ power series was conducted in various studies ([1-10]); however,to the best of our knowledge, Taylor series knowledge of engineering majors was not investigated prior to this study. In thiswork, the ability of graduate and senior undergraduate engineering and mathematics majors responding to a set of
the improv game intervention are less conclusive. No significanteffect of the games specifically on self-efficacy or ambiguity tolerance could be found within thescope of this study. Nevertheless, the instructor and a large majority of students indicated that thegames were a positive addition to the course climate.Introduction Many first year engineering courses emphasize design principles. Inherent to design workis creativity, implying that there is a significant degree of choice in how to perform the work.This flexibility can be difficult for first year students. Often, the technical and pre-collegecourses to which these students are accustomed focus on closed-ended problems. As defined byWood [1], a closed-ended problem is one
) or somewhat (28/91responses) that demonstrations and hands-on modules help them learn, a notion that is supportedby extensive active learning literature. Specifically, active learning techniques (collaborative,cooperative, problem-based learning), when properly implemented, have been shown to improvelearning compared to traditional lecture [1]. A meta-analysis of 225 studies investigating activelearning in undergraduate STEM courses reported that student performance increased by 0.47SDs with active learning and the odds ratio for failing the course was 1.95 under traditionallecturing [2]. Importantly, these results held true across STEM disciplines and class sizes [2],supporting that the methods can be expanded to benefit students studying a
personal sense of social responsibility and engineeringcurriculums. By answering these questions, we seek a deeper understanding of how students canform meaningful connections with engineering and become more inclined to stay in the program.Data will be presented in the form of pre- and post-surveys from the students regarding thecourse and engineering overall and the students’ impressions of the Ethics lectures.IntroductionMany professional engineers agree that the most rewarding aspects of their jobs are seeing theirideas come to life and having a direct effect on people’s everyday lives [1]. Students respondpositively to messages that promote these values of engineering, yet there are low retention ratesin engineering, due to students
vs. Law/Employer: #1: Decision Making: 61% Class Case Study: 44% Class Case Study: 38% Class Case Study: 38% TriggeredSituationalInterest 36% Top3StudentSituationalinterestdefineshowstudentsconnecttolessoncontentandhowthey #2: Class Case Study: Ethics Codes & Morals: An Engineer’s Role in Ethics vs. Law
wasconducted on a six-year cycle, in which both direct and indirect measures were used by the CETprogram. Direct measures included Performance Indicators (PIs) that are drawn from both thesenior project and the coursework. Indirect measures included senior exit surveys, alumnisurveys, and industry advisory council surveys. The framework presented enabled the CETprogram to implement continuous improvement measures into the program, and thus, could beimplemented by other construction engineering programs nationwide, both as a generalassessment tool and/or to achieve ABET accreditation.IntroductionWith today’s competitive educational environment, assessment has become one of the maindrivers of excellence for most educational institutions [1], giving
contribute to thecurrent syllabus content related to learning outcomes and aimed at exploring the student mind-set.The Department expected the experiences gained through interclass collaborations and activefeedback would enable a better EDM and SDP course structure. The integrated activities wouldalso improve syllabus material drawn from surveys to afford the students’ subject mastery.I. IntroductionAcross engineering departments in universities, the Capstone Design course is arguably the mostinfluential course for engineering students. Fundamentally, the Capstone Design course is thesummative assessment of the engineering curriculum, which pushes students to reach the createlevel in the revised Bloom’s Taxonomy [1]. In addition, many universities
each year were surveyed. Participants were also asked for their CEE preferencessuch as which types of courses (technical, management, EH&S, legal, other) they would prefermore of and what was their preferred delivery format (face to face, hybrid, online). Thisinformation should be invaluable to those developing curricula and designing and deliveringcontinuing professional development for engineers.IntroductionThe need for CEE has been well-documented [1]. Continuing education is critical for workingengineers because of the breadth of processes and equipment they design and use and because ofrapid changes in technology [2]. For example, plant engineers take courses to learn how tooperate different types of equipment specific to their
1 and 2 show representative project topics adopted with collaboration from industry incivil engineering and environmental majors, respectively. Various projects were performed bystudents in both civil engineering and environmental engineering majors in the past years.Faculty typically seek projects from the networks of local practitioners in the fall semester andhad a list of projects with associated practitioner-mentors ready at the first week of the capstonedesign classes in the spring semester. Students then formed their own teams and selected aproject to work on throughout the spring semester. The capstone projects were real-world design-oriented projects that were in their conceptual stage. As such, in addition to data provided
professional and interpersonal skills within engineering curricula, as aresponse to calls from professional bodies and industry for these skills in graduates [1] – [5]. Arecent example of this is the proposed ABET Student Outcome 7, which is related to functioningeffectively as a team [5]. This increased emphasis on non-technical outcomes has also led to areevaluation of the concept of ‘engineering leadership’, and how it might be effectively taught toundergraduate engineering students. As educators continue to create learning experiences todevelop a host of professional, interpersonal, and entrepreneurial skills, multiple definitions andmodels for engineering leadership have emerged [6].One common approach to teaching ‘engineering leadership’ at the
” (or, in the context of differentialforms, “1-forms”2) for stacks, “contravariant vector densities” for sheaves, and “covariantvector capacities” for thumbtacks.It cannot be the objective of introductory courses to teach that full menagerie. Nevertheless,the concept of co- and contravariance and dual bases strikes the authors as essential enough tobe embedded into the course content of undergraduate engineering mathematics. Dual basesemerge in a variety of contexts, reaching from solid state physics over continuum mechanicsto multiresolutional analysis.In solid state physics, for instance, one takes advantage of the fact that the atoms are arrangedin crystalline lattices. When considering waves propagating through such a lattice (x
enrollments in VIP at the GeorgiaInstitute of Technology, and examines the number of semesters students (N = 869) participate in VIP bypolicy, by academic rank, and by matches-mismatches between student and instructor departments. In asecondary analysis, persistence rates are compared for a degree program before and after an incentivizingcredit-use policy was established (N = 45). Results show correlation between higher persistence and twopolicies: 1) allowing all VIP credits to count as in-major electives after a minimum number are earned;and 2) allowing students to fulfill a design sequence requirement through VIP, with no additionalplanning/requirements beyond the normal design sequence. The study employed chi-square analysis forall but one
(SAT/ACT) and high school GPA are often the primary measures ofperformance by which potential for success is evaluated. In other institutions, students areadmitted to an ME program after completing certain pre-requisite courses within theundergraduate curriculum. Pre-requisite courses may include a series of math and sciencecourses that provide a solid foundation for upper-level ME courses. In both cases, data-drivenadmission criteria may provide a more informed quantitative measure of student potential forsuccess.Others studies have examined relationships between various measures of performance andstudent success in college [1], [2], [3], [4]. A study conducted at the University of Michigan’sCollege of Engineering concluded that ACT math
semesters. The results show that studentsthat used shared answers received statistically significant lower average class scores. The resultsalso show that the GUIs did not affect the students learning in sketching shear and momentdiagrams, but the results provided the instructor with data about which students shared solutions,which students used shared answers, and that no answer sharing occurred between the courses ofdifferent semesters.IntroductionIn the learning process, instruction is provided to students through varying styles of teaching thatfall under one of the many common learning models and theories [1], [2], [3]. The instructionprovides students new information that needs to be assimilated into their understanding [1]. Theretainment of
’sandbeyond.ThisworkshopprovidesanoverviewoftheCC2005andrelatedreportsandlinksthemtothetransitionintotheCC2020project.ItalsoprovidesparticipantswithauniqueopportunitytocollaboratewithmembersoftheCC2020taskforceandcontributetothedevelopmentoftheresourcestheprojectwilldeliver.TheworkshopauthorsandparticipantswillengageinactivitiestohelpdefinehowComputingisdefinedwithintheprojectanddiscusshowtoextenditsinfluenceinglobalundergraduatecomputingeducationforthefuture.Theauthorsanticipatefullaudienceinvolvementandparticipationinformulatingthisvision.Keywords—Computingeducation,CC2020,CC2005,futureComputingeducationI.INTRODUCTIONIn2015,theAssociationforComputingMachinery(ACM)begantoexploreavenuesthroughwhichtoupdatethebroadlyinfluential:ComputingCurricula2005document,taggedasCC2005[1].ACM,theAssociationforInformationSystems(AIS),andtheIEEEComputerSociety(IEEE-CS)weresponsorsofthe2005document.In2016,ACMdecidedtoproceedwiththenewproject.Itestablishedanexploratorycommitteetoascertaintheneedforanewreport.ACMandIEEE-CSbecametheprincipalsponsorsoftheCC2020project.Otherprofessionalorganizationshavejoinedintheeffortwithadditionalsponsorship;theseincludetheAssociationforInformationSystems(AIS),andAssociationforInformationTechnologyProfessionals,EducationSpecialInterestGroup(AITP/EDSIG
) Mary A. Sadowski has been at Purdue since 2003 and until September 1, 2011 served as the Associate Dean for Undergraduate Programs and Learning in the Purdue College of Technology where she provided leadership for strategic initiatives in undergraduate education. She was Dean of Purdue Extended Campus from 2011 to 2015 and professor of Computer Graphics from 2015 -2017 when she officially retired from Purdue. As a professor of Computer Graphics, her research interests include enhancing visualization skills, cre- ative thinking, and learning styles. She developed a Delphi instrument to gather data to create a concept inventory for engineering graphics and has worked with a team to develop and test the fully developed
believe it could be usedsuccessfully by others.IntroductionAn interdisciplinary group of university faculty worked together in a Faculty LearningCommunity to study a pedagogy called Understanding by Design (UbD). We then implementedit in our university courses. Results were reported in [1].Just as we were completing this study, I was tasked with developing a new program inManufacturing Engineering Technology. The school had no engineering technology programs atthat time so there was no guideline to follow. But this also meant there were no constraints.Where to start? It seemed natural to turn to the principles underlying the UbD approach andadapt it to use in the development of the program. It was helpful for many aspects of this taskproviding
will explore a successful faculty developmentprogram. For more effective teaching and learning in undergraduate engineering education,there is a strong need for evidence-based faculty professional development to shift frominstructor-centered teaching to student-centered, active learning, which is more effective [1].The NSF's Improving Undergraduate STEM Education (IUSE) program funded a large-scalefaculty development program at a large, public university which uses a train-the-trainerapproach, similar to Pimmel, et al., to engage faculty in a year-long modeling program with asemester of eight biweekly workshops, followed by a semester of six biweekly Community ofPractice innovation discussions. Here, we describe the creation, scaling
piezoelectrics, nanomanufacturing, optical measuring techniques, and intercultural design.Dr. Jeffery J. Leader, Rose-Hulman Institute of TechnologyMiss Jessa B. Ward, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Jessa Ward is a master’s student in the Biology and Biomedical Engineering Department at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology. She is interested in biomechanics, prosthetics, and orthotics. More specifically, her thesis work is examining the biomechanics of Kinesio tape. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Creating Laboratories to Aid Student Modeling Ability in Calculus IAbstractIn this paper we will report on the development and deployment of a laboratory sequence forCalculus 1 students
: Modern Diagnostic Imaging Systems. Taught for (junior and/or senior) students,this course has an enrollment of 70-80 students each year. The learning objectives of thelaboratory modules were to 1) give students a sense of how the equipment works in a real lifesetting; 2) incorporate elements of creativity and design; 3) improve student performance; 4)increase student interest in the subject material; and 5) give the students the opportunity to learntangible skills that are applicable in the industry.Throughout the course of the semester, the students experienced a combination of designchallenges, lab experiences, and clinical experiences based on the section of the course they werecompleting. The course had 6 sections, 5 of which had
post-secondary level, with a number of institutions developing WeBWorK problems for use inengineering. The WeBWorK Open Problem Library (OPL) contains around 33,000 problemsthat are freely available to instructors to use within their courses (currently, around 200mechanical engineering problems are available)1. The OPL problems are organized under ahierarchical taxonomy structure of “subject”, “chapter”, and “section”, where subject is an areaof study (e.g. linear algebra, probability, etc.), and chapter and section locate a particularproblem within the subject (e.g. linear algebra – matrices – inverses), analogous to a textbookstructure2. Having an easily understandable and comprehensive taxonomy available makes itsimpler for contributors to
to AMtechnologies [1], [2]. The Combat Direction Systems Activity (CDSA) at Dam Neck is atechnical lead for Print the Fleet, and has provided feasible and cost-effective solutions to issuesencountered by sailors, like adapter brackets for phone boxes and models to use in the flight deckcontrol board [2]. More recent efforts to support future Navy innovations and problem-solvingskills include 3D Print-a-thon events, and the establishment of the Marine Maker community,which includes Maker Labs, Maker Units, Mobile Training, Collaboration Portals, and courses[3] – [5].The Creating the Fleet Maker (CFM) project is an effort supported by the Navy and MarineCorps Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics Education, Outreach and