sequence and faculty focused onclassroom implementation while also participating in discipline-based communities-of-practice.The communities-of-practice sessions focused on themes featured in the workshops, but allowedfor more give-and-take, flexibility of topics, and sharing of instructional ideas. Themes includedtopics such as promoting an inclusive environment, engaging students through collaborativeprojects, and using formative assessment during class time.Throughout the academic year, classroom practices of the faculty were evaluated by trainedobservers using the Reformed Teaching Observation Protocol (RTOP). The RTOP is a 25-itemvalidated observation protocol with sound psychometric properties [1], [2] and it has beenutilized in numerous
laboratory education involve two commonly used modes of laboratory:face-to-face and remote. The effectiveness and suitability of a mode for laboratory work forfirst-year students in terms of better learning of practical skills depend to some extent on theform of the interactions that are possible in the two laboratory modes. In other words, theskills attainable through laboratory education are direct consequences of the interactions thatoccur in laboratory work.There are basically three types of interactions in the laboratory: student-student, student-instructor and student-equipment [1]–[4]. The level of these interactions determines thestudent satisfaction and their engagement in the laboratory. In remote laboratories, studentsinteract with their
. JCR and SJR and SNIP, oh my.The Engineering Design Graphics Journal (EDGJ) was examined on selected metrics withrespect to its effect: what it brings about, what it produces, and what it accomplishes. Thepurpose of this examination was to provide the Journal’s stakeholders—researchers, authors,administrators, and the Journal staff—with a sense for the Journal’s standing among its peers.This examination was limited to the data collected and analyzed by Scimago Lab [1], a companywhose mission is to improve scientific visibility and online reputation. Specifically, theexamination focused on statistics available through Scimago Lab’s Journal Rankings [2], whichis a component of their Journal & Country Rank [3].Journal & Country Rank was
engineeringcurriculum.ASEE saw an increase in interest in the topic and launched the Engineering LeadershipDevelopment Division (LEAD) as of 2015. LEAD has grown to over 1,000 members across over400 institutions and seeks to “support the creation of engineering leadership educationalprograms and outcomes, viewed by those who participate in the programs and those who hire thegraduating students, as the best in the world” [1]. A strategic planning committee, analyzing thedrivers of change and the challenges related to engineering leadership, developed four strategicinitiatives to focus research and initiatives of the division. These four initiatives highlighted theneed to understand the concept of engineering leadership and how to incorporate it intoengineering
an approach to the world, a critical way to understand and explore and engage with the world, and then have the capacity to change that world… President Barack Obama, March 23, 2015 [1]The Founders of the United States’ democratic system of government realized the importance ofinnovation for the newly formed Republic. In Article I of the Constitution they bestowed uponthe Congress powers it deems necessary, “To promote the progress of science and useful arts, bysecuring for limited times to authors and inventors the exclusive right to their respective writingsand discoveries” [2]. Today we see a rich and complicated legal landscape that has evolved forthe past 250 years within the US. The
(Epicenter). Chen earned her undergraduate degree from UCLA and her Ph.D. in Communication with a minor in Psychology from Stanford University in 1998. Her current research interests include: 1) engineering and entrepreneurship education; 2) the pedagogy of ePortfolios and reflective practice in higher education; and 3) reimagining the traditional academic transcript.Dr. Sheri Sheppard, Stanford University Sheri D. Sheppard, Ph.D., P.E., is professor of Mechanical Engineering at Stanford University. Besides teaching both undergraduate and graduate design and education related classes at Stanford University, she conducts research on engineering education and work-practices, and applied finite element analysis. From 1999
situational variables interact with the cognitive component to determine how anindividual is likely to behave in response to an ethical dilemma" (Trevino, 1986, p. 602). Thismodel considers two groups of variables to moderate the effect of cognitive moral developmenton ethical behavior: (1) individual variables and (2) situational variables. Ego strength (strengthof self-regulating skills), field dependence (i.e., the degree one depends on external referent toguide one's behavior), and locus of control (i.e., the degree one perceives one has control onone's life events) are the three individual variables. Situational variables are then categorizedunder three main categories: (1) characteristics of the work, (2) organizational culture, and (3
learning in basic sciences and math were applied in BE, to establish acommunity of learners, and to combat retention issues. The curriculum was overhauled in partto address a lack of enrollment, and the faculty wanted to ensure that students enrolled in themajor would learn about BE in a supportive environment.The first two courses in the BE curriculum that comprise the “first year sequence” in the majorare:BE 1250 (offered each fall): 2 credit hours; 6 hrs. lab. Fundamentals of engineering design;presentation of an engineering design; graphical expression of engineering design usingcomputer-aided drafting.BE 1252 (offered each spring): 2 credit hours; 1 hr. lecture; 3 hrs. lab. Effect of variability andconstraints of biological systems on
Economics, Moscow, Russia, npulya@stanford.edu Dr Victor Taratukhin, Regional Director, SAP Next-Gen, Knowledge and Education, SAP Silicon Valley and European Research Center for Information Systems (ERCIS), University of Muenster, Germany, victor.taratukhin@sap.com1. Introduction At present, project-based education is one of the most significant and in-demand profes-sional skills. Project-based education is the important part in the whole studying process aswhile exactly working at the project the students gain skills of solving the practical importanttasks, get the knowledge and skills, which can be used in further educational and professionalactivity [1],[2]. To tribute the significance of the project based methods, both in
Society for Engineering Education, 2018 The Graphic Novel: A Promising Medium for Learning ResearchAll education requires a medium for facilitating learning. Oral education gave way to books, whichhave remained an educational staple until the present day. Thanks to the Internet and more recentlymassively open online courses (MOOCs), learning through video has become more widespreadthan before (see [1], [2] for review). As we become more familiar and proficient with creating thesemultimedia artifacts, we can better understand their limitations and possibilities. Videos can offeran audiovisual experience that evolves in a linear manner. Books can offer a multimedia experience(mainly a verbal-visual one) that readers can determine the rhythm
diversity at the K-12, undergraduate, graduate and faculty level. She has been primary organizer as well as a faculty mentor for several Future Faculty Workshops. She also worked in the Office of Institute Diversity at Georgia Tech on a part-time basis from 2011-2015. She was named Senior Goizueta Faculty Chair in 2015.Dr. Jennifer Tygret, University of Colorado, Colorado Springs c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018Running head: IMPACT MENTORING PROGRAM 1 The IMPACT Mentoring Program: Exploring the Benefits of Mentoring for Emeriti Faculty Sylvia L. Mendez, Valerie Martin Conley, and Jennifer Tygret
the creative process, and that the experience dispelled misconceptions ofcreativity that it only applies to the arts. Limitations of the study and future directions for theprogram and related research are discussed.IntroductionAccording to the National Science Foundation (NSF), Research Experiences for Undergraduates(REU) programs strive to increase the number of students, including those from underrepresentedgroups, who are involved in research in meaningful ways (NSF, Retrieved February 1, 2018). TheNSF Program solicitation estimates awarding grants for approximately 180 new REU sites eachyear with anticipated funding, including new sites and supplemental awards, exceeding $68million annually. The number of awards and the amount of
stipulated in the program criteria are limited to the areas ofcurricular topics and faculty qualifications. There is a perception that innovation, flexibility, andcreativity in civil engineering curriculums are stifled by the EAC-ABET program criteria. Thegoals of this study are to determine if the civil engineering program criteria (and indirectlyASCE's Body of Knowledge) have 1) hindered innovation and 2) standardized civil engineeringcurriculums.A curriculum study was performed of 86 EAC-ABET accredited civil engineering programs inthe United States. The study included programs from all 50 states; small and large; public andprivate; and research and teaching focused. For uniformity in the study and because the majorityof civil engineering
facultymember’s teaching, future teacher training sessions should offer free lunch or other benefits toincrease attendance.Key Words: Teacher Training, Voluntary Attendance, Workshop Structure1. Introduction The responsibilities of a college or university faculty member are incredibly diverse. Mostfaculty have responsibilities to teach, perform research, develop courses and curriculum, reviewpapers, recruit students and serve on various committees. The amount of skills that a facultyneeds to be successful in many of these endeavors is immense. Over the course of a career, most faculty spend an enormous amount of time teaching. Evenfaculty at universities focusing on research with a 2/1 load (two classes one semester and oneclass the other semester
between the systems. Functional modeling, a qualitative modeling approachto represent systems through their transformations of energy, material, and information flows, isused to demonstrate this functional similarity by mapping components in each system to acommon function. One system, a household hair dryer, was chosen for its familiarity to students,while the other, a car radiator, was chosen to be intentionally less intuitive for the students. Keyquestions in this research were as follows: (1) would students have a significantly betterunderstanding of the more common hair dryer than the car radiator? (2) And, would students’understanding of the two systems change following learning functional modeling? This researchprovides a starting point
successfully improved student satisfaction and self-perceived understanding of coursematerial. This format also improved the delivery of content to students as assessed bymaintaining pertinence to the lab topics and clear understanding of learning concepts.Keywords: Inquiry-based learning; Flipped lecture; Laboratory modules; Active-learningIntroductionThe Biotransport Laboratory at Purdue University’s Weldon School of BiomedicalEngineering Program implements three main pedagogical learning methods, including inquiry-based, active-learning, and flipped-classroom strategies. Inquiry-based learning has beenstudied extensively and is reported to have positive impact on student performance and on theapplication of fundamental theory.1-4 Through this
cross-culturally, and more generally about how engineering andtechnology can contribute towards creating positive change within communities. DesignSummits have predominantly been held in Cambodia and India, as well as Nepal, Malaysia,Timor-Leste, and Samoa, with community-based organisations that EWB Australia alreadyhas an existing relationship with.The Design Summit program has a number of aims, including ‘nurturing future developmentleaders’ and ‘embedding people-centred values and approaches in engineering education’. Toevaluate how well these aims are being met, a questionnaire was adapted from existinginstruments that purport to measure multi-cultural competence [1] and the perceived socialresponsibility of engineers [2, 3]. The results
the critical pre-requisitechains involves the so called “mechanics sequence,” which runs from Physics to Staticsand then to Mechanics and Dynamics. This paper examines how performance in thesekey classes affects students’ persistence in engineering, as measured by GPA atgraduation and time-to-graduate. It is found that Statics has the largest impact on theacademic success of struggling mechanical engineering students. While some studentscan overcome poor grades in Physics, struggles in Physics often foretell continuedproblems throughout the mechanical engineering curriculum.1. IntroductionRecent decreases in state funding and corresponding increases in tuition have transferredthe financial burden of college to the student, resulting in a
in establishing theexternship was key. These results suggest that externships can positively influence trainees’career development, but that impact could be enhanced through clear, structured planning. Inresponse, we developed a learning contract that is being piloted. We present the learning contractas an emergent tool to support experiential learning among predoctoral biomedical students.IntroductionProviding biomedical predoctoral students with information about a variety of career pathwaysand the ability to pursue them is a longstanding national concern [1] - [5]. Previous predoctoraleducation models—and associated research—emphasized preparation for faculty careers [6], [7].However, changes in funding structures, scientific and academic
. Rather than assuming to employ peripheraltactics that include popular culturally relevant themes (such as music, language, or token symbols),we utilize a deeply committed approach and a pedagogy and research methodology based oncritical race theory in education with the components posited by Solórzano and Yosso (2000): 1)the centrality and intersectionality of race and racism, 2) the challenge to dominant ideology ofcolor-blindness and objectivity, 3) commitment to social justice, 4) value and centrality ofexperiential knowledge, and 5) use of interdisciplinary perspectives.Overview of STEM Career Engagement ApproachesThroughout the last decade, researchers have recommended that career exploration and awarenessbegin before high school
questions were posed to the students at each university. Tounderstand how grading biases propagated throughout the exam questions, each of the professorsre-graded the questions from all three universities at the conclusion of the course after thestudent identifiers were removed. A comparative study was then performed to determine if therewere patterns in the grading results from each professor.Background and Literature ReviewSynthesis Providing feedback on engineering exams is an important phase of the learning processfor both the professor and student [1]. For the student, this leads to grades and a permanentrecord of achievement, which influences their attitude toward the course and even profession [2],[3]. For professors, student
chemistry and GPAs afterthree semesters if they perceived chemistry was important for their engineering degree. Thesefindings suggest greater encouragement of the use of SI in gateway science classes by femalesand students undecided in their engineering major in particular can impact their academicsuccess.IntroductionSupplemental instruction (SI) has been utilized in academic institutions as a strategy to retainstudents, particularly females, in their degree programs [1], [2], [3]. To limit attrition inprograms such as engineering, universities have provided academic support for first-yearstudents enrolled in the gateway math and science courses that have been historically challengingfor students and have prevented or deterred students from
. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 The Internet of Things prototyping platform under the Design Thinking methodology. Yulia Yadgarova, Research Scholar, Georgia Institute of Technology, yyadgarova3@gatech.edu Dr. Dr. Victor Taratukhin, Professor University of Münster, victor.taratukhin@sap.com Dr. Dr. Jörg Becker, Professor, University of Münster, becker@ercis.uni-muenster.de Abstract. The paper describes the current gap in the Design Thinking [1] process with respect to creatingthe complex Internet of Things prototypes. The study lasted the several years have proven the usability of Design Thinking process whiledeveloping user-centered and complex IT applications [2
regarding the stateand trends of online education. Data from these reports are summarized below. While there arevarying definitions of an online course, the Babson Survey Group defines an online course as“one in which 80% or more of the course content is delivered online.”1 All students who wereenrolled in one or more online courses were included in this data.Figure 1 shows the overall enrollment trends in higher education since 2002. Caution should beused when interpreting these results as the methods used to gather data have changed during thistime period. In 2012, the Babson Group switched their data collection methods from surveyingand projecting from individual institutions to using data from the United States Department ofEducation’s
engineering.IntroductionDespite gender similarities in mathematics and science achievement, women continue to beunderrepresented in STEM education and careers [1]-[3]. Of the 108,969 bachelor’s degrees inengineering awarded in 2013-2014, 20,031 (18.4%) were awarded to women [4]. Between 2000and 2013, the proportion of science and engineering bachelor’s degrees in all fields awarded towomen remained mostly flat with declines in computer science (10%), mathematics and statistics(5%), physics (3%), and engineering (1%) [5]. Some researchers reported retention rates inscience and engineering in the U.S. have been disproportionately high for women [1], [6], whileothers have pointed out the attrition rates for women were consistent with those in other majors[7]. Research has
program, continuing education, experience,and mentoring: material sciences, mechanics, experiments, problem recognition and solving,design, sustainability, contemporary issues and historical perspective, risk and uncertainty,project management, breadth in civil engineering, and technical specialization.(C) Professional outcomes achieved through the degree program, experience and mentoring:communications, public policy, business and public administration, globalization, leadership,teamwork, attitudes, and professional and ethical responsibility.Detailed commentaries on these outcomes, along with their rubrics in the cognitive domain andthe desired level of achievement can be found in the report published by the BOK2 TaskCommittee [1]The BOK3TC
directorate and significantly easethe process of engaging future scientists via REU sites.IntroductionThe CISE directorate of NSF has funded Research Experience for Undergraduates (REU) sitesfor over 30 years, offering hundreds of faculty principal investigators (PIs) the experience ofmentoring undergraduates through research projects by running an REU site. Starting in 2002,CISE has organized REU PI meetings to share best practices among PIs to raise the quality ofimplementation across all sites. According to Matzen and Alrifai [1], however, a 2008 SIGCSEsurvey showed notable differences in PIs’ objectives for and conceptualization of undergraduateresearch. Thus, while the structure of successful REU sites can vary, there is still a need
industrial-scale system that operates based on theconcepts previously introduced. Design then allows for the broadest application of experientiallearning. This stage drives students to create an experiment answering a specific problem, or finda solution to a specific challenge dealing with fundamental properties; Design effectivelyincorporates inquiry, discovery, experimental methods, open-ended problem identification, andsolution. Overall, the 3-D approach integrates hands-on experiences with lecture learning,laboratory courses and in-class demonstrations/projects to give students the knowledge andexperience necessary to be strong problem solvers with a grasp on curiosity and the importance oflife-long learning.1-4At Northeastern, the two semesters
intelligent system, and an instrument forencouraging collaboration among industry partners. It is flexible and adaptable to meet the needof individual partners, inspiring to grow knowledge, build skills and abilities to support thecollaboration. It is idealized to be managing operations with a holistic approach throughout thesupply chain and thus providing customers the fullest satisfaction. Business owners will be ableto establish a fast and data-driven communication with all stakeholders, such as customers,business partners, and employees to bring innovative and customized solutions. As shown inFigure 1, the structure of the Smart Management System is founded on the enhancedconnectivity among stakeholders; the two key technologies, Internet of
enrolled in an introductory programming course in theElectrical Engineering and Computer Science program. This course is a prerequisite formany computer science and computer engineering students, while also serving asubstantial non-major population at the institution. Our sample includes 948 students whotook this course from four instructors in the Fall 2016 academic semester. The course isstructured as two lectures per week and one weekly lab section. All instructors used thesame instructional resources, including all assignments and exams. Demographics forstudents in the course are shown in Table 1. Students in the sample were 61% male andpredominantly White (49.6%) or Asian (31.3%). We included also included EWS data onall other courses in