engineers to obtain 21st century skills related to communication, leadership, and cultural, humanities, and ethical sensitivities, Provide opportunities for students to gain in-depth experiences in Challenges areas, as a mechanism to prepare them for engineering careers broadly, and to prepare them to be the future innovators to help solve these challenges. Figure 1: National Academy of Engineering, Engineering Grand ChallengesBelow are details of the implementation of strategic messaging in K-12 programming, theapplication process, and first-year engineering program in support of improving studentperformance metrics:B.1.1 Pre-College Programs: The College of Engineering at University Name has a substantialPK-12
multidisciplinary teams 77% Exhibit prototyping and fabrication skills 73% Use modern engineering tools 73% Design a product or process to meet desired needs 73% Manage time 67% Engage in professional and ethical practice 65% Communicate effectively (verbal and technical writing) 60% Design and conduct experiments
professional behaviour. a. Identify and utilize standards of academic honesty/integrity. b. Indentify how the foundations of engineering ethics impact their experience. 2. Articulate unique, personally relevant examples of how the things they are learning apply to the real world. 3. Demonstrate interpersonal and relationship skills, such as tact, diplomacy, teamwork. 4. Demonstrate logical thought process to break up a complicated problem into simple, resolvable steps or segments. a. Utilize algorithmic/computational thinking/design processes. 5. Apply basic principles, relationships, and mathematical laws to solve problems. 6. Understand the principles of developing a model for a complex system, and
efforts mentioned above.Table 3. Course learning objectives Course objectives ABET student outcomes Applying appropriate mathematical and scientific models to solve client- a based problems Designing a system, component, or processes to meet desired engineering c and k needs Determining the impact of contemporary issues on the design process j considering realistic constraints such as economic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety, regulatory, manufacturability, and sustainability Developing an understanding and being able to explain the importance
knowledge and methods required to evaluate sustainability concepts and systems. • Design, manufacture, and manage processes in an environmentally conducive manner. • Analyze engineering and management problems in their social and environmental context. • Develop economic, environmental, and social sound sustainable decisions. • Evaluate the impact of products, processes, and activities through life cycle assessment. • Develop written communication skills required for this profession. • Demonstrate professional, legal, and ethical responsibility in decision making practicesPLOs clearly enunciate both the technical and the management skills needed to be a leader in anorganization. The objective of
Paper ID #21418Reimagining Energy: Deconstructing Traditional Engineering Silos UsingCulturally Sustaining PedagogiesDr. Gordon D. Hoople, University of San Diego Dr. Gordon D. Hoople is an assistant professor of general engineering at the University of San Diego. His research interests lie in microfluidics, rapid prototyping, genomics, engineering ethics, and engineering education. He earned his MS and PhD in mechanical engineering from University of California, Berkeley and a BS in engineering from Harvey Mudd College.Dr. Joel Alejandro Mejia, University of San Diego Dr. Joel Alejandro (Alex) Mejia is an assistant
experienced them. However, elementssuch as the real-time interaction between students with their peers, instructors and mostimportantly the instruments were felt to be missing in the remote laboratory and this absencewas a matter of concern for them. They stated that each interaction type had a significant roleto play in their learning during the first-year of engineering studies and also for building astrong foundation of engineering concepts for further engineering studies in their degree.Students’ responses further indicated that internet-mediated interactions could also interferewith their acquiring some of the expected learning outcomes such as instrumentation,communication, experimentation, ethics and safety matters, and learning from failures
. Their responsesrevealed a wide range of perspectives with the level of appropriation of the concept ofchangemaking engineering expressed along a continuum. As pointed out by Kabo and Baillie[10], concepts such as social justice, sustainability, humanitarian practices or ethics can bethreshold concepts to define what a changemaking engineer is. Using this idea, the authorscreated three distinct categories to classify how students defined changemaking engineering. Thefirst group represents students who did not relate engineering and changemaking in ways thatreflect the perspective of the university, or the RED project. These students did not relateengineering with changemaking or by defined every engineer as a changemaker. Nine (32%)students were
competitions they could lead as a junior or senior (i.e., concrete canoe, steel bridge, mini-Baja, ethics, robotics)Fall-Spring Club Meetings Mentorship, connection to future internships and jobs, service opportunitiesFall Mathematics Jeopardy Opportunity to compete using calculus skills only STEM majors are developingJanuary Academic Training for
invites student participation. Class exercises are designed to explicitly facilitate that. Woods and Howard [11] effectively used class exercises for information technology students to study ethical issues. Day and Foley [12] used class time exclusively for exercises, having their students prepare beforehand for class with materials provided online. Frydenberg [13] primarily used hands-on exercises to foster student understanding in data analytics. Based on the context of the class module, class exercises were designed for the class time to explicitly raise questions to invite student participation. It may be questions to think further into the concepts for a deeper understanding, or practice using their knowledge with
; society program in the De- partment of Engineering and Society at the University of Virginia. He is the principal investigator at University of Virginia on the ’4C Project’ on Cultivating Cultures of Ethical STEM education with col- leagues from Notre Dame, Xavier University and St. Mary’s College. He is also the co-leader of the ’Nano and the City’ thematic research cluster for the Center for Nanotechnology in Society at Arizona State University. Rider is a Research Collaborator with the Sustainability Science Education program at the Biodesign Institute. His research focuses on wicked problems that arise at the intersection of society and technology. Rider holds a Ph.D. in Sustainability from Arizona State University
higherorder thinking skills. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 20(4), 401-422.[7] Perry W G. (1970). Forms of intellectual and ethical development in the college years: ascheme. San Francisco, USA: Jossey-Bass.[8] Culver, R.S. & Hackos, J.T. (1982). Perry's model of intellectual development (Vol. 72).Engineering Education, 73: 221-226.[9] Belenky, M. F., Clinchy, B. M. N., Goldberger, R. & Tarule, J. M. (1986). Women's ways ofknowing: The development of self, voice and mind. New York, USA: Basic Books.[10] Baxter Magolda, M. B. (1992). Knowing and reasoning in college. San Francisco, USA:Jossey-Bass.[11] King, P. M. & Kitchener, K. S. (1994). Developing reflective judgment: understanding andpromoting intellectual growth and
Wind by William Kamkwamba and Bryan Mealer, about a boy inMalawi who built a windmill to power his community. In 2017, the book selection was TheImmortal Life of Henrietta Lacks by Rebecca Skloot, which focuses on ethics and issues of classand race within science.During the fall semester, students participate in a 1.5-hour discussion session led by two upper-level College of Engineering students. These discussions focus on important themes in the bookand how these relate to engineering and the experiences of a first-year student. The sharedexperience is intended to encourage community-building and promote a sense of belongingamong the students. This discussion also prompts reflection about what it means to be anengineer, including the
digital library, and professional development workshops such as the STEM Think Tank (Goal 1). D. Have their STEM interest sparked by using modern engineering tools and gaining new knowledge of engineering careers (Goal 2). E. Understand the social relevance and ethical implications of engineering activities related to manufacturing (human rights, environmental impact, etc.) (Goal 2). F. Share knowledge, ideas and concepts working on teams with professional and pre- service teachers, research mentors and industry partners (Goal 2). G. Acquire collaboration and networking possibilities through interaction with real-world engineering industry and government mentors and partners (Goal 3). H. Attain
. Severalapproacheshavebeenusedtoattempttobridgethisgap.Theapproachesincludepairingengineeringfacultywithfacultyfromotherdisciplinessuchasthesocialsciences,liberalarts,andpeacestudiestodevelopcontentandtolearnformeachother.Inaddition,avarietyof“FacultyEmpowermentWorkshops”wereoffered.Faculty Empowermentworkshops are events dedicated to providing the faculty with preparation needed to effectivelyteach professional skills such as teamwork, communication, social impact, and ethics. Thesealso include discussions of effective pedagogies (e.g. active learning, or project-based learning)and innovative approaches such as incorporating everyday examples. Three FacultyEmpowerment Workshops were held during the past year, which include:• Teaching Student Teams This workshop, from Matthew Ohland at Purdue University, was designed to help faculty design, implement, and evaluate positive
projects they face as professionals. Dr. Koretsky is one of the founding members of the Center for Lifelong STEM Education Research at OSU.Michelle Kay Bothwell, Oregon State University Michelle Bothwell is an Associate Professor of Bioengineering at Oregon State University. Her teaching and research bridge ethics, social justice and engineering with the aim of cultivating an inclusive and socially just engineering profession.Dr. Devlin Montfort, Oregon State University Dr. Montfort is an Assistant Professor in the School of Chemical, Biological and Environmental Engi- neering at Oregon State UniversityDr. Susan Bobbitt Nolen, University of Washington Professor of Learning Sciences & Human DevelopmentDr. Susannah C
associate professor of electrical engineering at Kettering University. Dr. Finelli’s current research interests include student resistance to active learning, faculty adoption of evidence-based teaching practices, the use of technology and innovative pedagogies on student learning and success, and the impact of a flexible classroom space on faculty teaching and student learning. She also led a project to develop a taxonomy for the field of engineering education research, and she was part of a team that studied ethical decision-making in engineering students. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Introduction and Assessment of iNewton for the Engaged Learning of
include funding opportunities for students who starttheir engineering studies at ECU and students who elect to begin their engineering studies at acommunity college. Currently 23% of seniors scheduled to graduate from the engineeringprogram at ECU in either May or December 2018 began their college experience at a communitycollege. It has been observed that transfer students tend to be more mature than many of thestudents who started as freshmen and have a very strong work ethic. This makes transferstudents, who have proven they are capable of completing college course for two years, lessrisky investments for scholarship funds. In the 2015-16 academic year, 49% of bachelor’sdegree recipients had been previously enrolled in two-year public
classrooms andprovided with opportunities to visualize what process skills look like in student interactions andstudent written work.IntroductionIt is generally recognized that students need to become proficient in skills that help themoptimize their education in active learning environments and prepare them to be successful in theworkplace. Recent National Research Council (NRC) reports [1, 2] focused on undergraduateeducation in STEM fields noted that current global challenges require people working in sciencefields to be skilled in solving problems, reasoning, communication, and collaboration withpeople in other disciplines. In a similar fashion, the engineering community listed teamwork,communication, and ethics/professionalism as being critical
director of the Center for Excellence in Teaching and Learning, and associate professor of electrical engineering at Kettering University. Dr. Finelli’s current research interests include student resistance to active learning, faculty adoption of evidence-based teaching practices, the use of technology and innovative pedagogies on student learning and success, and the impact of a flexible classroom space on faculty teaching and student learning. She also led a project to develop a taxonomy for the field of engineering education research, and she was part of a team that studied ethical decision-making in engineering students. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018
that includes synthesis, dissemination, exchange, and ethically-sound application of knowledge to improve the health of Canadians, provide more effectivehealth services and products, and strengthen the health care system.” [1]. Knowledge translationis emphasized in health care especially because: 1) there are high costs associated with longtemporal lags and 2) there are large gaps between new research and clinical practice which leadto an inefficient use of limited health care resources [2–4]. This area of scholarship has advancedto the stage where there are journals (e.g., Implementation Science) dedicated to addressing theseconcerns specifically. In practice, knowledge translation can be applied to the initial design ofresearch protocols [5
Paper ID #23879Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Peer AssessmentDr. Edward F. Gehringer, North Carolina State University Dr. Gehringer is an associate professor in the Departments of Computer Science, and Electrical & Computer Engineering. His research interests include computerized assessment systems, and the use of natural-language processing to improve the quality of reviewing. He teaches courses in the area of programming, computer architecture, object-oriented design, and ethics in computing.Dr. Ferry Pramudianto, North Carolina State University Dr. Ferry Pramudianto is a Senior Research Engineer at Computer
- Year Students as of 2009 The reasons for the low retention in the minority undergraduate students were identified in the literature as lack of academic preparedness, campus climate, lack of commitment to educational goals and the institution, problems in social and academic integration and the lack of financial support [5]. The authors’ institution, the only HBCU with the Water Resources Management and Environmental Engineering majors, has a professional and ethical obligation to change this situation by providing financial support and academic guidance through the faculty and peer mentorship to the African American students, especially the female students from the low-income families. In addition, the department
policies. Currently, the federal government is threatening to rescind theDeferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program. Consequently, at the time ofsubmission, there was more disagreement than consensus regarding DACA recipients andimmigration policies in general.This political climate is important because SCC is located in a state with a large population ofDACA recipients and a large population of immigrants. When creating the recruitment survey,our research group initially wanted to ask questions about US citizenship, but given the largeimmigrant population at our study site, ethics, and overall empathy, we decided not to includethis question on the survey. Additionally, we believe that this political climate might influencesome students
literate citizen needs to have: (1) a basic vocabulary of scientific terms andconstructs; and (2) a general understanding of the nature of scientific inquiry [5, 6]. The sixelements of science literacy are: (a) understanding basic science concepts, (b) understandingnature of science, (c) understanding ethics guiding scientists’ work, (d) understandinginterrelationships between science and society, (e) understanding interrelationship betweenscience and humanities, and (f) understanding the relationships and differences between scienceand technology [7]. The proportion of U.S. adults qualifying as being scientifically literate isnow 28% and has doubled over the last two decades, but the current level is still problematic fora democratic society that
for the field of engineering education research, and she was part of a team that studied ethical decision-making in engineering students.Dr. Khalil Najafi, University of Michigan Khalil Najafi is the Schlumberger Professor of Engineering, and Peter and Evelyn Fuss Chair of Elec- trical and Computer Engineering at the University of Michigan since September 2008. He received the B.S., M.S., and the Ph.D. degrees in 1980, 1981, and 1986 respectively, all in Electrical Engineering from the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor. His research interests include: micromachining technologies, micromachined sensors, actuators, and MEMS; analog integrated circuits; implantable biomedical mi- crosystems; hermetic and vacuum
Paper ID #21174Engagement in Practice: Using Community Engagement to Teach DraftingSoftware to Civil Engineering StudentsDr. Nathan E Canney P.E., Dr. Canney conducts research focused on engineering education, specifically the development of social responsibility in engineering students. Other areas of interest include ethics, service learning, and sus- tainability education. Dr. Canney received bachelors degrees in Civil Engineering and Mathematics from Seattle University, a masters in Civil Engineering from Stanford University with an emphasis on struc- tural engineering, and a PhD in Civil Engineering from the
engineering, mechanical design, engineering mechanics, engineering education, engineering ethics, tech- nology and society. He is a member of ASEE, ASME and SAE. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Engagement in Practice: CAE Education via Service-LearningThe Call"To Seek to Learn is to Seek to Serve." This is our university’s motto [1]. It fits well with theintents and purposes of service-learning for students. Service-Learning has long been proven tobe an effective tool for engineering education [2], [3], [4]. In a National Academy of Engineering(NAE) report titled Educating the Engineer of 2020 - Adapting Engineering Education to theNew Century, service-learning is listed as one of six
relating to curriculum design in engineeringas well as to suggest ways in which teaching in engineering classrooms can be improved formaximum benefit to both instructors and students.Background One major goal of engineering education is to prepare students who possess disciplinaryknowledge, technical skills, and are capable of identifying and applying solutions to complexproblems [1]. These engineering traits have also been recommended in publications such as TheEngineer of 2020 [2]. In this report attributes of the future engineer are explicitly described aspossessing strong analytical skills, practical ingenuity, creativity, good communication,leadership roles such as in business and management, demonstrated levels of ethics
. References[1] "Interdisciplinary," in Merriam-Webster, ed, 2017.[2] L. Westbrook, Interdisciplinary information seeking in women's studies. Jefferson, N.C.: Jefferson, N.C. : McFarland & Co., 1999.[3] J. T. Klein, "Interdisciplinary," in Encyclopedia of Science, Technology, and Ethics, C. Mitcham, Ed. Detroit: Macmillan Reference USA, 2005.[4] D. Goldenberg-Hart, "Enhancing graduate education: A fresh look at library engagement," ARL: A Bimonthly Report on Research Library Issues and Actions from ARL, CNI and SPARC, no. 256, 2008.[5] Association of College and Research Libraries. (2016). Framework for Information Literacy for Higher Education. Available: http://www.ala.org/acrl/standards/ilframework[6