Organizational Leadership (OL). She is also the Director of Graduate Studies in OL. She is an attorney, licensed to practice law in the state of Indiana, and she teaches law courses in both the undergraduate and Master’s degree programs in OL. Her primary research areas are employment law and cyber law, specifically related to the legal implications of social media use, data privacy, and sexting laws.Dr. S. Scott Moor P.E., Indiana University Purdue University, Fort Wayne Scott Moor is an Associate Professor of engineering and Coordinator of First-year Engineering at Indi- ana University-Purdue University, Fort Wayne. He received a B.S. and M.S. in chemical engineering from MIT. After more than a decade in industry, he returned
engineering.References[1] R. S. Adams, J. Turns, and C. J. Atman, “Educating effective engineering designers: The role of reflective practice,” in Design Studies, 2003, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 275–294.[2] G. Lemons, A. Carberry, C. Swan, L. Jarvin, and C. Rogers, “The benefits of model building in teaching engineering design,” Des. Stud., vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 288–309, 2010.[3] D. Tolbert and S. R. Daly, “First-year engineering student perceptions of creative opportunities in design,” Int. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 879–890, 2013.[4] S. R. Daly, E. A. Mosyjowski, and C. M. Seifert, “Teaching Creativity in Engineering Courses,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 103, no. 3, pp. 417–449, Jul. 2014.[5] L. A. Liikkanen and M. Perttula, “Exploring problem
within the College.ReferencesFletcher, S. L., Newell, D. C., Newton, L. D., & Anderson-Rowland, M. R. (2001, June). The WISE summer bridge program: Assessing student attrition, retention, and program effectiveness. In Proceedings, American Society for Engineering Education.May, G. S., & Chubin, D. E. (2003). A retrospective on undergraduate engineering success for underrepresented minority students. Journal of Engineering Education, 92(1), 27-39.Peuker, Steffen, (2017). Improving Student Success and Retention Rates in Engineering: A Four- Year Longitudinal Assessment of the DYP Program. In American Society for Engineering Education. American Society for Engineering Education.Science & Engineering
study the effectiveness of this approach and to develop arobust framework for assessing the direct impacts of these labs on choice of major.References[1] Carnasciali, M., Thompson, A., Thomas, T., “Factors influencing students’ choice ofengineering major” 120th ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, (2013) 407-416[2] Haines, C. S., D Lima, M., Li, N., Spinks, G.M., Foroughi, J., Madden, J. D.W., Kim, S.H.,Oliver, R., Fang, S., Jung de Andrade, M., Göktepe, F., Göktepe, O., Mirvakili, S.M., Naficy, S.,Lepró, X., Oh, J., Kozlov, M.E., Kim, S.J., Xu, X., Swedlove, B.J., Wallace, G.G. andBaughman, R.H., “Artificial Muscles from Fishing line and Sewing Thread” Science, Vol. 343,(2014) pp. 868-872[3] Edwards, R., “The Role of Laboratory Work in
, write a problem statement, collect requiredinformation/data, calculate a numeric answer, and justify their solution. Informed by our pilot study, Grigg et al.’s [7] problem solving rubric, and our own experiences,we redesigned the ill-structured problem assignment used in spring 2017 and assigned it to 130 first-yearengineering students as a replacement for a 20-point exam question. The assignment required students toidentify and analyze a physical phenomenon using physics principles from the course. The module thatthis was assigned during focused on Newtown’s Laws, forces, circular motion, drag, terminal velocity,Newton’s Universal Law of Gravitation, and weightlessness. Students were given two weeks tocomplete the assignment and
the operationalization of LMMI in thecontext of EML which will inform future curriculum development, particularly for large first-year engineering design and project-based learning courses.References[1] A. J. Dutson, R. H. Todd, S. P. Magleby, and C. D. Sorensen, “A review of literature on teaching engineering design through project-oriented capstone courses,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 86, no. 1, pp. 17–28, 1997.[2] D. Clive et al., “Engineering design thinking, teaching, and learning,” J. Eng. Educ., no. January, pp. 103–120, 2005.[3] C. Charyton and J. A. Merrill, “Assessing general creativity and creative engineering design in first year engineering students,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 98, no. 2, pp. 145–156, 2009.[4
. Matthews, and D. R. Kelly, “Grit: Perseverance andPassion for Long-Term Goals,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol. 92, no. 6, pp.1087-1101, 2007.[2] A. L. Duckworth and P. E. Quinn, “Development and Validation of the Short Grit Scale(Grit-S),” Journal of Personality Assessment, vol. 91, no. 2, pp. 166-174, 2009.[3] A. L. Duckworth and D. S. Yeager, “Measurement Matters: Assessing Personal QualitiesOther Than Cognitive Ability for Educational Purposes,” Educational Researcher, vol. 44, no. 4,pp. 237-251, May 2015.[4] A. L. Duckworth, R. E. White, A. J. Matteucci, A. Shearer, and J. J. Gross, “A Stitch inTime: Strategic Self-Control in High School and College Students,” Journal of EducationalPsychology, vol. 108, no. 3, pp. 329-341
allengineering science courses during the spring of 2018 are satisfied with this change. The data from courseevaluations in May 2018 support this change.Preliminary data supports the used of the Engineering Science Learning Laboratory as scores on examsare higher for those that use this laboratory versus those that do not. These methods have been assessed intwo student cohorts and the data to be presented is preliminary with a sample size of approximately 15 percohort.REFERENCES[1] Oklahoma Employment Security Commission Economic Research and Analysis Division, STEMOccupations and Employment: A Brief Review for Oklahoma, 2012.[2] S. Freeman, S. L. Eddy, M. McDonough, M. K. Smith, N. Okoroafor, H. Jordt, and M. PatWenderoth, “Active Learning Increases
. One possibility is to have multiple stations. Another is to write or display results in real time and make it a competition.Readers are encouraged to contact the authors if they would like further details about the project,including assignments, PCB files, and bill of materials.References [1] J. W. Dally and G. M. Zhang, “A freshman engineering design course,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 82, Apr. 1993. [2] J. Kellar, W. Hovey, M. Langerman, S. Howard, L. Simonson, L. Kjerengtroen, L. Sttler, H. Heilhecker, L. Ameson-Meyer, and S. Kellogg, “A problem based learning approach for freshman engineering,” in 30th Annual Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), Feb. 2000. [3] H. Lei, F. Ganjeizadeh, D. Nordmeyer, and J
require supporting evidence Clarification of a career path REFERENCES[1] S. Peuker, and N.A.G. Schauss, “Improving student success andretention rates in engineering: An innovative approach for first-yearcourses,” June 2015. In Proceedings of the 122nd ASEE AnnualConference and Exposition. See also supporting materials athttp://discovery-press.com/discovery-press/studyengr/NewResource/0.asp[2] R.E. Wertz, S. Purzer, M.J. Fosmire, and M.E. Cardella, M. E.“Assessing information literacy skills demonstrated in an engineeringdesign task,.” 2013, Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 102,no. 4, pp.577-602.[3] Q. Zhang, M.. Goodman, and S. Xie, “Integrating library instructioninto the course management
. “Video games and the future of learning,”Phi delta kappan, vol. 87, no. 2, pp. 105-111, 2005.[5] S. Deterding, D. Dixon, R. Khaled, L. Nacke. “From game design elements to gamefulness:defining gamification,” In Proceedings of the 15th international academic MindTrek conference:Envisioning future media environments, pp. 9-15, 2011. ACM.[6] K.M. Kapp, The Gamification of Learning and Instruction. California: Pfeiffer, 2012, pp.6-12.[7] S. Nicholson. “Strategies for meaningful gamification: Concepts behind transformative playand participatory museums,” Meaningful Play, 2012.[8] Removed for peer review[9] Epicenter Blog (2015). “Innovation and entrepreneurship games.” [Online]. Available:http://epicenter.stanford.edu/resource/innovation-and
Resources, Inc. 1997.[3] Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. , “Motivational beliefs, values, and goals”, Annual Review of Psychology, 53(1), pp. 109-132, 2002[4] Honken, N. & Ralston, P. “Freshman engineering retention: A holistic look”. Journal of STEM Education: Innovations and Research, 14(2), pp. 29-37, 1997.[5] Anderson-Rowland, Mary R. "Understanding freshman engineering student retention through a survey", Engineering Student Retention: Reducing Attrition and Improving Graduation Rates of Upperclassmen Engineering Students. An Annotated Bibliography, pp. 1-9, 1997.[6] Microsoft. “Microsoft releases national survey findings on how to inspire the next generation of doctors, scientists, software developers and
]: −∆P 150μ (1 − ε)2 1.75 ρ (1 − ε) 2 = 2 v ̅s + v̅s ∆L Dp ε3 Dp ε3is introduced and compared, term by term, with the qualitative expression obtained previously. Inthe Ergun equation, Dp is the packing particle diameter, is the void space fraction, and ρ and μare the fluid density and viscosity, respectively.Finally, students work on the complete design and construction of the flow system to satisfy theoverall requirements. To validate their design, they take pressure drop measurements as afunction of air and water flow rates, perform analyses of the experimental data, and compare theaverage values of
the Perry Model [4] and the Reflective Judgement Stages of King and Kitchener? [5]Theoretical FrameworkOur theoretical framework consists of the Perry model of intellectual development, first formedduring the 1960’s, and the King and Kitchener Reflective Judgement Model, beginning in1994.[4] [5] [6] Both models are forms of epistemic cognition, involving the role of uncertaintyand context in the acquisition of knowledge, and its effects on the development of beliefs aboutspecific types of knowledge. It appears that the higher levels require the use of critical thinking.Perry originally identified nine levels of cognitive skills leading to knowledge from a state of“right” vs. “wrong” to a state of awareness that knowledge is relativistic and
. Both and D. Baggerear, "Hasso Plattner Institute of Design at Stanford," [Online]. Available: https://dschool.stanfard.edu/resources/the-bootcamp-bootleg.[2] A. J. Dupree, "How to annalyze a business opportunity," [Online]. Available: http://www.andrewjdupree.com/blog/2016/5/30/analyzing-a-business-opportunity.[3] Science Education Resource Center @ Carlton College, "Starting Point Teaching Entry Level Geoscience - What is a Gallery Walk," 14 November 2016. [Online]. Available: https://serc.carleton.edu/introgeo/gallerywalk/what.html. [Accessed 15 April 2018].[4] K. T. Ulrich and S. D. Eppinger, "Concept Generation," in Product Design and Development, New York, NY, McGraw-Hill Higher Education, 2008, pp. 101-104.[5] R. van der
engineering design specifications and parameterselections, the laboratory exercises related to control of the timer circuit and Booleanoperations with logic circuits. Students collect evidence of timer control by choosing theresistors and capacitors from the kit. The evidence is documented as displayed in Table 2.The students assemble the circuits to implement the NOT, AND, NAND, OR, and NORlogic gates. The operation of each gate is documented as shown in Table 3. Table 2: Timer control data Table 3: Truth table for logic circuit Resistor, Capacitor, Duration, Position of the Position of the LED Ohms (Ω) Farads (F) seconds (s) switch S1 switch S2 LIGHT
design. A second pilot is planned for Fall 2018 in which lessonsDesign projects in other categories tended to be either learned from this project will be incorporated.variations on existing designs or were underdeveloped. Students completed an on-line survey at the end of the REFERENCEScourse regarding the entrepreneurial design project and the [1] Besterfield-Scre, M., Zappe, S., Shartrand, A., Hochstedt, K.,design thinking methodology. They appreciated the “Faculty and Student Perceptions of the Content of Entrepreneurshipopportunity to be creative and enjoyed the project. One Courses in Engineering Education”, Advances in Engineering
engineering education at UC Irvine.the end of W15. As shown in Figure 3, both groups exhibited REFERENCESconsistent decrease across F14, W15 and W16. Furtherstudies are needed to examine the cause. [1] M. Borrego, J. E. Froyd, and T. S. Hall, “Diffusion of Engineering Education Innovations: A Survey of Awareness and Adoption Rates in U.S. Engineering Departments,” Journal of Engineering
2004,” National Science Board, May 2004 [Online].Available: http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/seind04/, last accessed May 25, 2009.[3] M. Yilmaz, J. Ren, S. Custer and J. Coleman, "Hands-On Summer Camp to Attract K–12Students to Engineering Fields," in IEEE Transactions on Education, vol. 53, no. 1, pp. 144-151,Feb. 2010.[4] S. Coffman-Wolph and K. Gray, “Women in STEM: What Experiences Influence Decisions”Paper to be presented at 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Salt Lake City, Utah. 10.June 2018.
meaningful project skills andlearning which might be significant when considering the lower amount of effort required.References1. Gelmon, S. B. (2001). Assessing service-learning and civic engagement: Principles and techniques. Campus Compact, Brown University.2. Lima, M., Oakes, W. C., & Gruender, J. L. (2006). Service-learning: Engineering in your community. Wildwood, MO: Great Lakes Press.3. Ropers-Huilman, B., Carwile, L., & Lima, M. (2005). Service-learning in engineering: A valuable pedagogy for meeting learning objectives. European Journal of Engineering Education, 30(2), 155-165.4. Coyle, E. J., Jamieson, L. H., & Sommers, L. S. (1997). EPICS: A model for integrating service-learning into the engineering curriculum
) underGrant No. 1734347. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed inthis material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NSF.References[1] X. Chen, C. E. Brawner, M. W. Ohland, and M. K. Orr, “A Taxonomy of Engineering Matriculation Practices,” 120th ASEE Annu. Conf. Expo., 2013.[2] M. K. Orr, C. E. Brawner, S. M. Lord, M. W. Ohland, R. A. Layton, and R. A. Long, “Engineering matriculation paths: Outcomes of Direct Matriculation, First-Year Engineering, and Post-General Education Models,” Proc. - Front. Educ. Conf. FIE, 2012.[3] M. K. Orr, C. E. Brawner, M. W. Ohland, and R. A. Layton, “The Effect of Required Introduction to Engineering Courses on
/xcell/Xcell32.pdf ,text [22], which was an outgrowth of the research presented https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xilinxhere [1]. [10] https://www.xilinx.com/products/silicon-devices/fpga/artix-7.html Thus based on written student surveys and observing the [11] https://www.xilinx.com/products/design-tools/vivado/vivado-general delight of students when building the projects, we webpack.htmlbelieve this approach (spiral model plus themed labs across [12] Brown, S. and Vranesic, Z., Fundamentals of Digital Logic withthe four years), and
2017 and 2018. In addition, two student teams presented their work at the 2017ASEE Zone II Conference and one team, composed of engineering students and an art student,presented a design solution at the spring 2018 ASEE SE Conference.Project Substantiation and ImportanceIn the 1980’s, research introduced that disability is socially created rather than rooted in theindividual [1]. More recent studies indicate that persons with disabilities may move through aprocess of seven types of identities: isolated affirmation, apathy, resignation, situationalidentification, affirmation, crusadership, and normalization [2]. Studies also indicate that the arts,including the visual arts, can be a tool to aid transition through these identities to enhance
science and technology as well as students approach to the technological designprocess. These areas will be explored more fully in future papers. References[1] X. Chen, “STEM Attrition: College Students’ Paths into and out of STEM Fields. Statistical Analysis Report. NCES 2014-001.,” Natl. Cent. Educ. Stat., 2013.[2] C. Dweck, Mindset: The new psychology of success. Random House, 2006.[3] D. S. Yeager and C. S. Dweck, “Mindsets That Promote Resilience: When Students Believe That Personal Characteristics Can Be Developed,” Educ. Psychol., vol. 47, no. 4, pp. 302– 314, Oct. 2012.[4] A. Rattan, K. Savani, D. Chugh, and C. S. Dweck, “Leveraging Mindsets to Promote Academic Achievement Policy
://peer.asee.org/18001. [Accessed: Mar. 29, 2018].[6] D. D. Burkey, M. F. Young, “Work-in-Progress: A 'Cards Against Humanity'-style card gamefor increasing engineering students' awareness of ethical issues in the profession,” in 2017 ASEEAnnual Conference & Exposition, Columbus, OH, USA, June 24-28, 2017, [Online]. Available:https://peer.asee.org/29190 . [Accessed: Mar 29, 2018].[7] Gulotta, J., Parisi, N., Bodnar, C. A., “Leveling Up by Gamifying Freshman EngineeringClinic” in 2016 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, New Orleans, LA, June 26-29, 2016,[Online]. Available at https://www.asee.org/public/conferences/64/papers/14871/view.[Accessed: March 29, 2018].[8] J. R. Rest, D. Navaez, S. J. Thoma, M. J. Bebeau, “DIT-2: Devising and testing a
thestandard deviation values decreased at the end of the term – thereby suggesting that the scatterwas more clustered at the end of the term. Whereas, the scatter was more varied at the begging ofthe term – suggesting that the incoming students had disparate skill sets.end of term student commentsStudent end-of-term comments in written evaluations were very positive - with the studentsindicating that the greatest benefit to them came from exposure to the Instructional TeamTeaching effort, which provided effective, supportive weekly monitoring and mentoring.references[1] Ulrich, K. T., & Eppinger, S. D. (2008). “Product Design and Development”. 2004. NewYork: McGraw-Hill.
Exercises Andinstructor has the opportunity to circulate and assess student Design Projects For First Year Engineering Students,” Proceedings ofprogress, or to address deeper issues that students may the 2001 Annual Conference.encounter. At the same time, students gain experience [7] Love, J. O., Freeman, S. F., Jaeger-Helton, K., and Whalen, R., “Noassessing their own work and build confidence in their ability Lab? No Shop? No Problem: Intentional Design of a First-yearto perform difficult laboratory skills. Another advantage of Engineering Learning Center with Enlightening Outcomes,” Proceedings of the 2015 ASEE
multidisciplinary hydroelectric generation design project,” in Proceedings of the 121st ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Indianapolis, IN, USA, June 15-18, 2014.[9] T. Bacquarta, S. Frisbee, E. Mitchell, L. Grigg, C. Coleb, C. Small, B. Sarkaref, "Multiple inorganic toxic substances contaminating the groundwater of Myingyan Township, Myanmar: arsenic, manganese, fluoride, iron, and uranium," Science of The Total Environment, vol. 517, pp. 232-245, 2015.[10] S. Frisbie, E. Mitchell, B. Sarkar, "Urgent need to reevaluate the latest World Health Organization guidelines for toxic inorganic substances in drinking water," Environmental Health, vol. 14, no. 1, 2015.
design project.In EXEP Cohort, students are registered for fall semester during summer orientation into thesame section of Algebra II, a First-Year CEAS Experience (ENGR 2100), and Introduction toEngineering Analysis (ENGR 1002). Depending on a student’s intended CEAS major, a fourthcourse – Engineering Graphics – or General Education course(s) are added to the schedule toattain full-time academic status, which is at least 12 credit hours. For the spring semester, afterthe EXEP students passed Algebra II with a grade of B or higher and are in Pre-Engineering orPre-Engineering Technology or Computer Science, they are registered into the same sections ofPrecalculus, Technical Communication, and General Chemistry I and Lab. Students add a CEASmajor
community service intent. ACKNOWLEDGMENTI would like to thank the two anonymous reviewers whosecomments ultimately added clarity and some additionalcontext to the paper. REFERENCES[1] Dimock, M., “Defining generations: Where Millennials end and post- Millennials begin”, Pew Research Center (retrieved from http://pewresearch.org), 01 March 2018[2] U.S. Census Bureau, 2016 American Community Survey 1-Year Estimates[3] Pennsylvania Budget and Policy Center, 2012 Student Poverty Concentration[4] Page, S. and Icsman, M., “5 things to know about the post-Millennial generation, or whatever you call them”, USA Today (retrieved from, https://www.usatoday.com), 22 March