Civil Engineering and Director of Construction Engineering at The Citadel in Charleston, SC. His academic experience includes: transporta- tion infrastructure planning and design, infrastructure resilience, traffic operations, highway safety, and geographic information systems. His research interests include: constructing spatial databases for bet- ter management of transportation infrastructure, improving transportation design, operation, safety and construction, understanding long-term effects of urban development patterns, and advancing active living within the built environment for improved public health. He teaches courses in interchange design, trans- portation engineering, highway design. engineering
to changes in geometry or operating conditions.In the course of developing this ability, students need to gain experience both in analyticalmodeling, and in making experimental measurements. In industrial scenarios in particular, it isoften important that experimental measurements be planned and executed in manner that causesminimal disruption of operations in addition to being carried out with sufficient accuracy for theresults to address the interests of the business.Development of these skills in the course of baccalaureate engineering technology programsaddresses three of the outcomes from the Criterion 3. Student Outcomes section of the 2019-20ABET documentation for accrediting engineering technology programs [1]. These Outcomesare:(1
all possible fronts. In response to the newest body of knowledge, the RTBCommittee is preparing an action plan to do just that.This paper summarizes the changes made to the CE-BOK between the 2nd and 3rd editions andexplains how the CE-BOK is and always has been the foundation of ASCE’s RTB effort. It willexplore how ASCE has historically used the CE-BOK as a catalyst to influence change in theprofessional preparation of civil engineers, and how it may be used in the future. Potentialhurdles to implementation will be shared, particularly considering significant changes that havebeen made. For example, CE-BOK3 has added an affective domain to some of its traditionalcognitive outcomes, which no doubt will present a challenge for implementation
Professor of Practice in SEDTAPP and Engineering Science at Penn State. Erdman has chaired the local Jaycees, Department of Social Services Advisory Council, GE Share Board, and Curling Club; and served on the Human Services Planning Council, United Way, Chamber of Commerce, and Capital Fund Drive Boards of Directors. Erdman has lectured on leadership topics at Penn State and RPI. He served as a recruiter (25 years) for GE and Lockheed Martin, on the Penn State College of Engi- neering Advisory Council, an Alumni Advisory Board, and as the President of the College of Engineering Alumni Society. Affiliations include Fellow of ASME, member of ASEE, AIAA, the Penn State Alumni Association, Centre County Chapter Board of
age of the participating students and to the timeframe available for the activities. 5 Figure 4: Elenco SC-750 Hobby kits [18]Mechanical Engineering and Mechanical Engineering Technology ActivitiesLEGO Mindstorms have been used in K-12 settings, and as a tool for teaching computerengineering and programming at the college level [19-23]. These robots are purchased witheducational modules and have plans for different age populations and respective activities, so itis easy to customize the activities based on the time available, the number of students, and theirage group.Robotic Badges Workshop Developed for the Girl ScoutsThe Robotic Badges workshop was held for the
’ confidence in chemistry, engineering andcomputer skills increased as a result of the course. The most significant increases were observedin engineering skills because initial confidence levels in this area were low. A majority ofstudents reported increased interest in STEM fields and 100% of students (during the 2018cohort) reported that increasing their confidence in science, math and engineering contributed tothis intensified interest. This program evaluation reviews the program’s objectives, format,teaching tools, student feedback and plans for future programming and assessment.IntroductionThe need for STEM-educated workers is long-standing and well-established [1, 2]. The USgovernment has responded by encouraging the development of a STEM
including technical work, planning,administration, writing, leadership, attitude, and initiative.Three years ago, only teams containing electrical or mechanical engineers participated in thiscompetition. Teams with exclusively computing majors (computer scientists and/or informationtechnologists) were exempt. But the following year, after seeing the benefits, the directors of thecomputer science and information technology programs requested that all teams participate.Sprint ReviewsThree years ago we developed an “agile-waterfall” design process to better accommodate projectswith both hardware and software components (which had become the majority of our projects).We interleave the traditional “waterfall” process common to engineering disciplines
Paper ID #27563Collaborative Autoethnographic Study of a Large-Scale Flipped ClassroomImplementation with Multiple InstructorsRobyn Paul, University of Calgary Robyn Paul PhD student at the Schulich School of Engineering, University of Calgary where she also works as the Program Evaluation and Planning Specialist. She is the team lead for the faculty on all matters related engineering education including teaching and learning, curriculum development, Capstone design and engineering accreditation. Robyn just completed master’s degree in engineering education where she is looking at the impact of engineering leadership
improvement. The project is groundedconceptually using the Academic Plan Model (APM) [11], which provides a holistic view of theeducational environment and provides context for how the educational environment is shaped.Viewing the FEC educational environment as an academic plan provided a way to criticallyexamine the educational environment, the elements that comprise it, and the factors thatinfluence it.The Academic Plan Model identified accommodating the “characteristics, goals and abilities” ofstudents (learners) ([11], p. 15) as a key element in decision-making for the educationalenvironment. In considering the FEC learning environment through APM, we acknowledge thatstudents’ past educational experiences influence why and how they engage in the
comparison to assessmentresults in a traditional course offering.BackgroundThe study of Construction Engineering involves courses in areas of construction practice such asestimation, scheduling, safety, project management, and plan reading and production. Suchcourses normally involve expenses for students in terms of textbooks, equipment, and software.The expenses for course textbooks and materials can be quite high. These include prices rangingto over $300 for individual textbooks in engineering [1], [2], to $700 per semester [3], toupwards of $1200 a year on average for civil engineering programs [4]. These costs also increaseat an exorbitant rate, with textbook costs estimated to have been increasing 1500%, or nearlythree times the overall rate
-part classroom observation protocol, an instructor interview protocol,two instructor surveys, and a student survey.We have collected data from nine courses taught in one of ten flexible classrooms at theUniversity of Michigan during the Fall 2018 semester. Two of these courses were first-yearintroduction to engineering courses co-taught by two instructors, and the other seven courseswere sophomore- and junior-level core technical courses taught by one instructor. Fiveinstructors participated in a faculty learning community that met three times during the semesterto discuss active learning, to learn how to make the best use of the flexible classroomaffordances, and to plan activities to implement in their courses. In each course we gathered
at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology. Kyle’s primary teaching duties include courses in geotechnical engineering and construction materials. His research interests include behavior and monitoring of in-place foundations and retaining structures. In addition to his teaching and research duties, Kyle is involved in geotechnical consulting and Engineers Without Borders.Dr. Matthew D. Lovell, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Matthew Lovell is an Associate Professor in the Civil Engineering Department at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology, and he currently serves as the Interim Senior Director of Institutional Research, Plan- ning, and Assessment office. He is also serving as the director of the Making Academic
. Jacob has focus on autonomous robotics spending time researching and competing in robotics. He plans on graduating in 2020 Jacob is currently the chair of the Autonomous Robotics Club (ARC). ARC annually compete in au- tonomous robotics competitions in the US. ARC also has focuses on educational robotics and volunteers or host events geared towards teaching robotics to grade schoolers. Please email janovosa@gmail.com to contact me.Mr. Huan Phan-Van, Southern Illinois University, Edwardsville Huan Phan-Van received his B.S. degree in Mechanical Engineering from Ho Chi Minh City University of Technology and Education, Ho Chi Minh, Vietnam, in 2013. He is currently a graduate student in Me- chanical Engineering
. Lopez Roshwalb), who had extensive experience (and was concurrently) teaching within the engineering design course. In our second iteration of the pedagogy seminar for engineering design LAs, we conceptualized the course as having three primary conceptual themes: (1) Theories and strategies for teaching and learning, (2) Design thinking in engineering, and (3) Equity (see the Appendix for a list of weekly readings and links to lesson plans). As mentioned above, all LAs enrolled in this seminar were concurrently working within the same introduction to engineering design course. As a consequence all students were able to bring in concrete “problems of practice” (Horn
instruction wall is a physical play structure.Children can enter the structure and climb between three levels, delivering colored balls to tubeslabeled with each of the three animals. Robot costumes allow children to be further immersed inthe role of a robot. The children are meant to weigh the benefits of different paths through the maze-likestructure, eventually choosing and “delivering the medicine” to the three animals along theoptimal route. On a station separated from the rest of the exhibit, labeled “Plan It!” on one sideand “Test It!” on the reverse, two-dimensional maps of the play structure can be used to plan andtest a route before physically entering the structure. To the right of the play structure, the exhibitfeatures a wall of
times they were meetingduring the week, how their tasks were being split up, and how they were planning for eachdesign phase. Appendix A provides the questions for each interview. Interviews were transcribedand analyzed by the primary author of this study.Results & DiscussionResults of the pre-survey are summarized as follows. Teams in group A were mechanicalengineering students who identified as makers and had taken a traditional engineering designcourse. One of the students in team A2 (which belonged to group A teams) had prior experiencewith the faculty’s design competition teams that were similar to his team’s capstone project.Teams in group B were students who identified as makers and participated in engineering designcourses that had
Commercialization 5X 2X 4. Project Management 1X 6X 5. Legal, Regulatory Issues, IP, and 5X 2X Important and need to Ethics be aware of it but isn’t generally a focus point 6. Strategic Planning 1X 3X 3X 7. Team Management 2X 5X 8. Professional Communications 1X 6X (written/verbal) 9. Entrepreneurship 4X 1X 2X This can be good or
Systems Engineering Failures Finding(s) Causal Action Discussion/Explanation The mine operator Pike River Mine explosion: “The original mine plan specified decided to change an two main fans located on the mountainside next to a ventilation aspect of the ventilation shaft. Two planning changes were made. Pike decided to relocate system design
course. Not every individual on the team needed to possess all skills but theteam required at least one individual who possessed strength in each skill. Student teamswere approved following completion of a composite skill matrix, and an adequate plan toaddress areas of team weakness.Between 2010 and 2013 team and leadership development activities were instituted andelaborated. In 2014 funding was provided by the Provost’s Office for a majorredevelopment of the capstone course for blended learning delivery. During the transition,course level learning outcomes were examined and mapped to the twelve CanadianEngineering Accreditation Board Graduate Attributes (CEAB GA) and the results wereincluded in the course syllabus (Jamieson, 2015; 2016; Ivey
managingtheir time. These students described struggling with scheduling time for work relating degreeprogress, balancing multiple responsibilities such as teaching or service, and planning theiractivities adequately for progress success. The fourth category was students that experiencedsocial isolation within their program and/or their institution. These students expressed in theirapplication struggling with specifically with being an ethnic and/or racial minority in adominantly white space.Year 3: As we plan for year three, we intend to continue having participants and advisors self-diagnose struggles as this approach has provided us with valuable information for tailoring theDI to incoming participants. Such information has allowed us to have a
-teachers who worked on planning and implementing lessonscollaboratively. Both co-teachers participated in the summer PD. This class met with the teachersevery school day of the week.Classroom B: 6th grade ProgrammingClassroom B with 21 students (12 male and 9 female) was an ICT class. It was allotted a doubleperiod (90 minutes) and was taught by a lead teacher who participated in the summer PD. He wasassisted by a co-teacher during the second half of the class. As the class was primarily roboticsbased, the lead teacher planed and implemented the lessons while the co-teacher assisted inmaintaining discipline and providing students with one-on-one support. This was also an Englishas Second Language (ESL) classroom, and all written instructions were
is an Undergraduate Mechanical Engineering student at Cal State LA. Joseph is an undergraduate research assistant, the Vice President of CSULA’s Robosub team, and he recently began an internship at NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory. Outside of engineering education, his research interests are in the field of trajectory planning and control for potential future Mars exploration aircraft.Mr. Jorge Diego Santillan, California State University, Los Angeles AUV Mr. J.Diego Santillan is an Electrical Engineer employed at NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory, cur- rently pursuing his Master’s in Computer Engineering. Diego acted as the President for the Robosub team as well as the senior design team lead for the same project in
Paper ID #25424Developing and Assessing Authentic Problem-Solving Skills in High SchoolPre-Engineering StudentsDr. Susheela Shanta, Governor’s STEM Academy @ the Burton Center for Arts and Technology - Center forEngineering Susheela Shanta earned her bachelor’s degree in Civil Engineering from India, a Master of Urban Plan- ning degree from the SUNY at Buffalo, NY and more recently, a doctoral degree in Curriculum and Instruction: I-STEM Ed from Virginia Tech. With ten years of experience in municipal planning in Philadelphia, PA, and Harrisburg, PA, and ten years in community development, planning, financing and
students enrolled in the After School STEM Practicum Course duringthe Spring 2018 semester participated in this study. All participants were enrolled asundergraduates in a large public university in the Western region of the United States, but variedin their academic year (2 sophomores, 4 juniors, and 11 seniors). Participants were primarilyfemale (16 female, 1 male) and liberal studies majors (16 liberal studies majors; 1 engineeringmajor). A majority of the students (11) stated on the first day of the semester that they hadalready planned to apply to a multiple subject (elementary) teaching credential program aftergraduation and the rest reported that they were considering teaching as a career.The course was taught during this semester by one of
andadequately planned for. Students’ performance data on this assignment and its learning objectivesare collected and used to assess learning based on the latest ABET-EAC Student Outcomes (2)and (4). Using the collected data and a set of associated rubrics, the instructor evaluates andgrades students’ performance and learning. Data also indicate that because of this exercise, amongothers, a number of students in the course choose hands-on electric vehicle-related design projectsfor their Senior Design I and Senior Design II course sequence in the following fall and springsemesters, respectively. The authors plan to publish the details of the senior design projects onelectric vehicles in future publications. Keywords—electric vehicles, V2G, G2V
value beliefs better predict plans to continue into an engineering career. Afterthe first year of engineering school, both expectancy and value beliefs decreased. The decreasein expectancy belief was expected since during the first year of college, students are transitioningfrom high school to harder college-level courses. The decrease in value belief was not easy toexplain. The paper notes (bold added): “What is more difficult to explain, however, is the finding that at the end of the year, students reported enjoying engineering less and viewed it as less important and useful than they did at the beginning of the year. One explanation may be that freshmen are idealistic at the beginning of their college careers and that
acrossinstitutions and with industry partners, these collaborations are not without their challenges. Oneresearcher at U of T discussed how government partners have very high expectations about thedeliverables that will result from the research partnership. While the expectation in academia isoften to publish research, the expectation in industry is typically to implement this research intoactionable plans. This dichotomy can lead to a disconnect with industry partners in terms oftimelines, aims, and research outcomes. Interviewees also noted that collaborating with partnersoutside academia can be a challenge in terms of gathering and sharing data. Both industry andacademia have a strong focus on protecting anonymity, which can make it challenging
course, but to enable in-class activitiesvarious examples and specific details were often omitted from lecture in favor of focusing timeon underlying concepts. With two class meetings per week, all or some of one class wasdedicated to an in-class lab, while the remaining class was largely a traditional lecture format. Tokeep the direct instruction portion of the class engaging various demonstrations and visuals werepresented, discussion was encouraged, and think-pair-share opportunities were provided. Think-pair-share discussion was utilized on the first day of class and the first lab was completed in thesecond week of the semester. This was planned intentionally, to set the tone that MASC 310would be an active learning experience and provide
logistical needs of managingthe program.Assignments in the 1-credit course UGTA preparation course included two reading assignmentswith follow-up online discussion forum posts relating the article content to their role as a UGTAand an implementation plan to introduce the reading outcomes for their specific class. Otherassignments included a focus on academic integrity, creation of a resume, and a reflectionsummary. Student feedback of the UGTAs who participated in this formal program revealed thata majority of students felt that their UGTA was prepared for in-class activities, helped tounderstand course material, provided help outside of the classroom, helped them succeed, andencouraged collaboration. However, feedback also suggested that there was
ethics module in Ethics Seminar course by assessing theimpact of the integrated e-learning module on: 1. knowledge of code(s) of ethics 2. using code(s) of ethics for ethical reasoning 3. conducting ethical reasoning 4. FE exam ethics section preparedness 5. ethical behavioral growthOnline Ethics ModuleThe University of New Haven developed a series of 18 online learning modules as part of their effort todevelop the entrepreneurial mindset of their engineering and computer science students [18]. Theuniversity’s plan is to integrate the modules into core engineering, and applied science courses and doesnot plan to use the modules outside off core classes. Content experts developed the modules with an onlineeducation