Paper ID #26387Resources and Partnerships for Community College Engineering and Tech-nology ProgramsProf. Karen Wosczyna-Birch, CT College of Technology/Regional Center for Next Generation Manufacturing Dr. Karen Wosczyna-Birch is the Executive Director and Principal Investigator of the Regional Center for Next Generation Manufacturing, an National Science Foundation Center of Excellence. She is the State Director for the College of Technology, a seamless pathway in technology and engineering from all 12 public community colleges to 8 public and private universities. Dr. Wosczyna-Birch has expertise with both the recruitment
countries, higher education institutions in Latin American arestill dominated by the concept of a ‘traditional education’ that emphasize the transmission ofdisciplinary contents and the paramount role of professors inside the classroom. This modelfocuses more on what is it taught (contents and topics of different subjects), and less on whatstudent will be able to do and how will be able to use acquired knowledge and skills in his or herprofessional life after graduating the program.To switch the traditional focus from teaching to learning is not easy since it implies theassumption of new curriculum concepts that should lead and assure an effective learning [7].It is worth noting, for example, that in some Latin American countries where academic
area of curriculum and academic program development, construction management, construction material waste minimization, sustainable residential construction, greenhouse gas reduction, green building rating programs and process evaluation. Don possesses diverse work experience in the design, construction and project management of various types of building and infrastructure projects.Mrs. Neetu Sharma, MacEwan University Neetu Sharma is an Associate Professor with the Department of Accounting and Finance at MacEwan University in Edmonton, Canada. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Experiential Student Learning through Collaborative Simulated
expose more students to the makerspace and to leverage making in helping studentslearn engineering concepts while applying them in projects. Both women and men had a near equaltendency to request a more integrated curriculum that includes utilizing the makerspace intoassignments, as a direct function of these students valuing making as an integral part ofengineering. For example, Waldo, a white man, discussed his idea to better integrate making intothe curriculum. We do have students coming in from a handful of classes that want to use the printers for their projects, but it's not as integrated into the curriculum as I think it should be. That's something we're definitely working on. Talking to professors saying, ‘Hey
Missouri-Rolla. Michelle is co-leading an Undergraduate Research Community to support students learning through research, efforts to integrate open-ended problems throughout students’ curricula, research to remove stormwater pollu- tants via engineered treatment wetlands, and development of appropriate technology courses and research with strong emphasis on social sustainability.Dr. Jennifer Mueller PE P.E., Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Jennifer Mueller, PhD, PE, is an Associate Professor in the Department of Civil and Environmental En- gineering at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology. She obtained her BS in Environmental Engineering from Northwestern University, and she earned her MS and PhD in Civil Engineering
curriculum design project that students deliver both as a written document and as aposter presentation.Two major challenges have arisen in converting this course for an online audience. Onechallenge lies with the content itself and the second challenge lies in a core aspect of the teachingphilosophy.What about the content is challenging to convey online? The essence of ENE 506 is the abilityto align various aspects of curricular design into one unified whole. The goal is for students tosee how aspects of what is learned (content) map to how to measure learning (assessment) andhow students practice that learning (pedagogy). This process, which is at the heart of the course,is a very holistic, integrated, iterative process. However, the learning
different fields of study [3],[5],[6]. Many times social responsibility inengineering is incorporated into engineering degree programs via service-learning, volunteerism,clubs, etc.; however, sometimes the mark is missed because students do not fully understand the“inequalities and injustices among those helping and those being helped” [3].Our course, The Sky’s the Limit: Drones for Social Good, was designed to engage engineeringstudents with concepts of social justice integrated into an engineering curriculum. While someengineering classes introduce themes of social awareness, such as ethics, into the curriculum, thepresentation is often done as a discrete class component lasting for a week or so. The inclusion ofsocial justice material in
ready for an aerial survey ofthe disaster area in order to gain as much information as possible to plan a potential rescue/aidresponse for a town named ‘Disasterville.’Disasterville: Aerial survey of a disaster areaOur UAV curriculum includes a capstone challenge titled “Aerial Survey of a Disaster Area”. Tocomplete the challenge, students must conduct an aerial survey, using their UAVs with theircameras, of a model town that has been damaged by a natural disaster. The model town, dubbed“Disasterville”, includes buildings made of blocks, toy cars, and figurines of people. Studentscannot directly see the town; Disasterville is hidden from them by an intervening “mountainrange” (a plastic tarp over some chairs). Students must fly their UAV over
engineeringethics” was observed (a) in situations where interview subjects articulate initiatives entailing engi-neering ethics intervention and their respective involvement in the process, or (b) in general whensubjects remark on engineering and its ethical and societal implications. This umbrella code rep-resenting various justifications or rationales of engineering ethics then probed further to identifynuances of “why engineering ethics” in each case. The low level codes, finally were integrated intoarguments used to rationalize promotion of engineering ethics education.3.1 Compliance Argument: Meeting RequirementsABET Engineering Criteria (EC) 2000, as well as the recent revisions modifying or clarifyingrequirements, explicitly mention ”an ability
engineering practice will produce graduates who can address a wider range ofsocietal problems bringing new perspectives to traditional areas. We highlight examples from arange of engineering courses throughout the undergraduate curriculum. Some of these effortsincorporate modules in traditional engineering classes including Electrical Circuits, MaterialsScience, Operations Research, and Heat Transfer. We have redesigned our User-CenteredDesign class to more explicitly engage with these topics. In addition, we have developedinnovative new courses that integrate a sociotechnical view of engineering throughout the courseincluding Engineering and Social Justice and Engineering Peace. We have also replaced ourexternal evaluator team with an external
Connecticut and a Ph.D. in Polymer Science in 1977 from the Institute of Materials Science at the University of Connecticut. Tom was the past international chairman of the IEC (International Electrotechnical Commission) Tech- nical Committee, TC 113 on Nanotechnology Standardization for Electrical and Electronic Components and Subsystems. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019Maximizing the effectiveness of one-time standards instruction sessions with formativeassessmentAbstractThere are multiple obstacles associated with integrating standards education into the collegecurriculum, including the limited experience faculty may have with standards, and the difficultyto fit such training into an
undergraduate classes as well as integration of innovation and entrepreneurship into the engineering curriculum. In particular, she is interested in the impact that these tools can have on student perception of the classroom environment, motivation and learning outcomes. She obtained her certifica- tion as a Training and Development Professional (CTDP) from the Canadian Society for Training and Development (CSTD) in 2010, providing her with a solid background in instructional design, facilitation and evaluation. She was selected to participate in the National Academy of Engineering (NAE) Fron- tiers of Engineering Education Symposium in 2013 and awarded the American Society for Engineering Education Educational Research
Logic Array (FPGA) architecture and design methodology, Engineer- ing Technology Education, and hardware description language modeling. Dr. Alaraje is a 2013-2014 Fulbright scholarship recipient at Qatar University, where he taught courses on Embedded Systems. Ad- ditionally, Dr. Alaraje is a recipient of an NSF award for a digital logic design curriculum revision in collaboration with the College of Lake County in Illinois, and a NSF award in collaboration with the University of New Mexico, Drake State Technical College, and Chandler-Gilbert Community College. The award focused on expanding outreach activities to increase the awareness of potential college stu- dents about career opportunities in electronics
Mathematical/Computational Methods. He is the recipient of numer- ous teaching and pedagogical research awards, including the NCSU Outstanding Teacher Award, NCSU Alumni Distinguished Undergraduate Professor Award, ASEE Chemical Engineering Division Raymond W. Fahien Award, and the 2013 and 2017 ASEE Joseph J. Martin Awards for Best Conference Paper. Dr. Cooper’s research interests include effective teaching, conceptual and inductive learning, and integrating writing and speaking into the curriculum and professional ethics.Dr. Cheryl A Bodnar, Rowan University Cheryl A. Bodnar, Ph.D., CTDP is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Experiential Engineering Education at Rowan University. Dr. Bodnar’s research interests
currently facilitates an interdisciplinary project entitled ”Developing Reflective Engineers through Artful Methods.” His scholarly interests include both teaching and research in engineering education, art in engineering, social justice in engineering, care ethics in engineering, humanitarian engineering, engineering ethics, and computer modeling of electric power and renewable energy systems.Ms. Ngan T.T. Nguyen, Texas Tech University Ngan Nguyen is a research assistant and doctoral student in the Department of Curriculum and Instruc- tion at Texas Tech University. Her research is focused on fostering the learning experiences of Asian international graduate students in higher education.Dr. Roman Taraban, Texas Tech
belt and place them accurately into a drop-off fixture. In an effort togenerate interest within the robotic program and from local industries, the Department ofEngineering Technology at Drexel University responded to strength its curriculum by adding newinnovative components in its robotics and automation course, such as machine vision. A keycomponent in the robotics and automation course is the hands-on experience where student teamsuse and apply the vision systems hardware and software in an automated work-cell. In addition,the students are taught the principles of vision integration with other control devices, such as robotsand Programmable Logic Controllers (PLCs). The experiment results make the studentsunderstand the vast use of sensor
adoption.Institutional Contexts First and foremost, we acknowledge that the work described in this paper is largelythanks to institutional support. At the University of San Diego (USD), where author DAC works,the push towards contextualization in engineering is situated in a larger university mission andstrategic vision, a liberal arts University Core curriculum, and an NSF RED grant sharedamongst leadership in the School of Engineering, as well as a new engineering department andprogram committed to helping students understand how their work impacts society. (Details canbe found in [11].) Due to this multi-layer united initiative, the new Integrated Engineeringprogram at USD is committed to broadening the definition of engineering and providingstudents
preliminarystudies were conducted to justify the suitability and feasibility of the minor. During departmentfaculty meetings the proposed minor degree, Marine Construction (MC) minor, was announcedand an unofficial vote was taken to determine the faculty’s opinion. Once the proposed minorwas approved within the department, an official “academic minor proposal” was submitted to theUniversity’s “Curriculum Committee” and “All University Committee” for consideration andapproval.A critical step in the developing the academic minor is establishing the Program EducationalObjectives (PEOs) and the course outcomes. While the MC minor is not in itself an accrediteddegree, the authors referred to ABET criteria for accrediting engineering degrees [1] indeveloping the
Research Associate at Texas A&M University’s Center for Teaching Excellence, Dr. Clint Patterson supports curriculum research, doctoral education, and academic grant writing. The goal of these efforts is to provide evidence-based information for the Center and Texas A&M academic lead- ership, as well as developing students. Clint graduated from Tarleton State University with a doctorate in educational leadership in 2018. This academic experience offered opportunities to be a researching practitioner in higher education, specifically within student affairs at Baylor University where he worked for twelve years. As an educator in student affairs, Clint developed skills to advocate, support, and lead areas of
need to be taught, supported, and integrated into the curriculum[7].The Association of College and Research Libraries (ACRL) Visual Literacy CompetencyStandards for Higher Education [30] established an intellectual framework and structure tofacilitate the development of skills and competencies required for students to engage with imagesin an academic environment, and critically use and produce visual media throughout theirprofessional lives. The Standards articulate observable learning outcomes that can be taught andassessed, supporting efforts to develop measurable improvements in student visual literacy. Inaddition to providing tools for educators across disciplines, the Standards offer a commonlanguage for discussing student use of visual
Dublin- The University of Dublin. he is a Fellow of ASEE and Life Fellow of IEEE. he is an Honorary Fellow of the Institution of Engineers Ireland. He has special interest in education for the professions and the role of professions in society. He is author of Engineering Education. Research and Development in Curriculum and Instruction; The Assessment of Learning in Engineering Education; The Human Side of Engineering, and Empowering Professional Teaching in Engineering. He co-authored A Case Study in Curriculum Assessment - GCE Engineering Science (Advanced).Prof. Carl O. Hilgarth, Shawnee State University Carl O. Hilgarth, M.S., is current division chair of the ASEE Technological and Engineering Literacy
engineering path selection in colleges and universities wasobtained, and content analysis technology was applied to analyze the data in a bid to verifythe theoretical model extract key factors in the construction of new engineering in collegesand universities eventually.Results Research shows that the path of discipline integration, the path of disciplinederivative, the path of Exogenously industry-led, and the path of Endogenouslydiscipline-driven have become the main paths for the construction of "new engineering" incolleges and universities. Moreover, the path of engineering innovation has also been fullyaffirmed by some universities. The nature of disciplines along with the types andcharacteristics of colleges and universities exerts an influence
Engineering ProblemsStudents expressed perspectives on the relationship between social and technical dimensions ofengineering problems – an extension from Theme 1 in Spring 2018 – on two axes, as shown inFigure 5. In this visualization, the horizontal axis ranges from technical-social dualism on the leftto sociotechnical integration on the right, and the vertical axis represents how muchresponsibility engineers have over the social and technical dimensions of engineering problems.Illustrative quotes are provided for each case. By sorting student perspectives into these fourquadrants (I-IV), our team can better represent patterns in students’ perspectives, attempt tounderstand whether any resistance to sociotechnical integration is a result of dualism
students.In this paper, an overview of the IMPACT program will be presented. The curriculum of the FLCand discussion of the theoretical framework will be discussed. Evidence is given of IMPACT’ssuccess as a faculty development and course transformation program since it started in thesummer of 2011. Specific evidence will be discussed regarding the program’s positive influenceon instructors’ teaching practices as well as student success and learning gains in STEM courses.Overview of the IMPACT programThe IMPACT program originally built upon the work of Carol Twigg and the National Center forAcademic Transformation (NCAT). Twigg and NCAT created a tightly structured program bysynthesizing research on active learning5. NCAT targeted large, introductory
Society. It provides the rationale for curriculum implementation, andthe integration of SDG’s topics into the course material.2. Vision of the ProgramThis project has significant institutional support, as Penn State and UNI entered into a university-wide strategic partnership agreement. UNI provides local resources, faculty, coordination andlocal students. At Penn State, the Cross-cultural Engagement and STEM Program has beenadded as a faculty-led program in its portfolio of approved perennial study abroad programs.The Cross-cultural Engagement and STEM Program represents a joint educational initiative,focusing on cultural immersion, exchange and STEM activities between Penn State and UNI. Inthis program, up to 30 Penn State students can travel
, interdisciplinary REUs can help students understand how to transfer thesoft- and hard-skills they learn across other courses and experiences beyond the classroom.Achieving this objective is a matter of configuring REUs to help students see and applyconnections across different learning experiences within the REU context. This paper presents apilot study that assesses how an interdisciplinary summer REU program provided STEMstudents with professional development training. The objective of this experimental programwas to provide educational experiences that allowed participants to integrate soft and technicalskills in an overall biomedical engineering context
graduation) is double among transfer studentscompared to students who entered as freshman. Consequently, transfer studentsdisproportionately lack the family knowledge resource necessary to form realisticexpectations. Researchers have shown that students successfully navigate through transfershock when they are more transfer ready. Transfer readiness is impacted by counseling,advice from students and faculty, and an understanding of the academic requirements of thenew institution [11]. Another prominent factor impacting students’ success in four year completion aftertransfer is integration into the social aspects of the new institution. This social integrationincludes participation in clubs, organizations, and events of different cultures
investigates on the factorsimpacting construction projects delivery in both domestic and international markets and exploresthe desired leadership skills to manage dynamically transforming project delivery process.Acknowledging the necessity of a transformation in leadership approach, the paper also includeshow the author incorporates the respective leadership skill development strategies into his coursecontent. The strategies included joint capstone and design projects for construction and civilengineering students in an international setting (e.g. study abroad), developing the capability toperform life cycle analysis (LCA) by integrating engineering economics problems into ProjectManagement course, inviting guest lecturers from the leadership team of
mindset (KEEN,2018). Across the country, undergraduate engineering programs are pursuing the integration ofentrepreneurial studies within STEM curriculum. Private and public institutions aresupplementing a didactic education (e.g. earning a Minor in Entrepreneurship) with co-curricularactivities, such as encouraging engineering student participation in related student organizations,in themed living learning communities, in entrepreneurship competitions, in internships atstartups, and in networking events with alumni entrepreneurs, to name a few. Finally, within thelast few years, there has been an upsurge in physical spaces created to support on-campusstartups and networking with entrepreneurs-in-residence. These so called co-working spaces
implemented for the first time in the 2018-19 academic yearacross a two-semester senior capstone course. In this implementation, the e-learning module andinitial guest lectures preceded the initial business competition rounds in order to encourage andsupport student teams in their efforts to develop and communicate their business startup ideas,with the ultimate goal being the encouragement of engineering entrepreneurship. Studentperceptions and self-assessment results are presented in order to quantify the effects ofcombining multiple business modules into a single course sequence.IntroductionIncorporating entrepreneurship education into the engineering curriculum has seen a significantincrease in recent years [1]. ASME Vision 2030, an effort to