- resented youth in after-school programs, which was developed and deployed over the past 3 years with support from an NSF ITEST grant.Mr. John Daniel Ristvey Jr., UCAR John Ristvey, M.S., (UCAR, Principal Investigator), is development lead for Engineering Experiences in collaboration with Dr. Tammy Sumner, Srinjita Bhaduri, and Dr. Randy Russell. He provides expertise in Out of School Time (OST) programming with student supports and STEM education. Ristvey coordinates each of the teams and lead the design team as well as the work of the advisory board. He has conducted extensive research and development work in STEM OST projects such as Cosmic Chemistry (Institute for Educational Sciences, Department of Education) and
Paper ID #24808Board 40: Understanding Industry’s Expectations of Engineering Communi-cation SkillsDr. Lilian Maria de Souza Almeida, Utah State University Dr. Lilian Almeida is a Ph.D. Research Assistant at Utah State University.Prof. Kurt Henry Becker, Utah State University - Engineering Education Kurt Becker is the current director for the Center for Engineering Education Research (CEER) which examines innovative and effective engineering education practices as well as classroom technologies that advance learning and teaching in engineering. He is also working on National Science Foundation (NSF) funded projects
an increase in the graduateschool enrollments in science and engineering fields [1]. However graduate school attrition ratestend to be dismal across all disciplines [5], possibly due to the isolation felt by graduate studentsthat are tied exclusively to their research projects. Programs aimed to improve graduate schoolcompletion include national “Transformative Graduate Education Programs” (TGP); however48% of universities do not participate in such opportunities [6]. Smaller programs that are notnecessarily multi-institutional are vital to graduate students as they can provide support andprofessional development, especially in the area of teaching [7]. Most graduate students do notreceive training in teaching, however teaching experiences
and community populations Example(s) Integrate design thinking Increase the difficulty of and Introduce a design project in activities into technical labs time spent on lab projects which students design for and because the challenge was how with an elementary school you developed as an engineer classTable 3. Comparison of Similar Heuristic Observed in All Three Datasets Team Meetings Instructor Interviews Course Papers Title Increase activity within lecture Get students active in lecture Increase activity in lecture Description Add hands-on
in Engineering Mechanics at Iowa State University (ISU). Her research expertise includes ”Resilient and Sustainable Civil Infrastructures” and ”Smart Materials for Structural Health Monitoring”. In addition to her academic experiences, Dr. Nazari worked as a structural design engineer for five years, where she participated in several seismic rehabilitation projects. Her recent research grants and awards include SB-1 California Transportation grant, ASCE Fresno Best Research Project, SEI/ASCE Young Professional Scholarship, and ISU’s Research Excellence award. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019Assessing the networking preferences and resource satisfaction among engineering
State University scientists, engineers, and graduate students to develop and deliver professional development opportunities for K-12 teachers. Gabe’s primary focus of work is creating professional development opportunities for elementary teachers related to STEM education. Gabe has extensive experience in public education having taught for 16 years in the classroom. During this time he taught math and science classes in grades 4, 5, and 6 as well as teaching middle school technology courses for grades 6-8. He also has taught all subjects in an inclusion classroom for several years. Gabe facilitated his classroom by engaging his students in an interdisciplinary thematic format as well as using project-based and
apply logical thinking to designing and solving 4.38 4.38 0/0 0.00 0.50 PS problems16 I am confident in leading a team to work on a project 3.79 4.42 0/0 0.63 0.00 TB17 I always maintain a good interpersonal relationship in a 4.13 4.46 0/0 0.33 0.01 TB team18 I am able to identify potential stakeholders for a new 2.83 3.78 6/0 0.95 0.00 ES product or service19 I am able to address stakeholder interests in a business 2.69 3.83 8/0 1.15 0.00 ES plan20 I am able to communicate an engineering solution in 3.19 3.92 3/0 0.73 0.01 AF economic terms21 I am able to substantiate claims
Paper ID #25283Analyzing Successful Teaching Practices in Middle School Science and MathClassrooms when using Robotics (Fundamental)Mrs. Veena Jayasree Krishnan, NYU Tandon School of Engineering Veena Jayasree Krishnan received a Master of Technology (M. Tech.) degree in Mechatronics from Vel- lore Institute of Technology, Vellore, India in 2012. She has two years of research experience at the Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, India. She is currently pursuing Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering at NYU Tandon School of Engineering. She is serving as a research assistant under an NSF-funded DR K-12 re- search project to
University of Central Florida. Dr. Ahmad has diverse expertise in human-computer interaction, quality engineering, and simulating man- ufacturing systems. Ali worked on projects related to transfer of training, user-centered design, process improvement, and virtual environments. Dr. Ahmad is a Certified Simulation Analyst and a Certified Six Sigma Black Belt. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Use of Minitab Statistical Analysis Software in Engineering TechnologyAbstractThe Engineering Technology curriculum provides wide spread knowledge in problem solving,management of resources, and process planning. Statistical decision-making is a key skillrequired by Engineering Technologists, and
presented is the first iteration of a larger system. For this firstphase of the project, the system uses standard (draft) schedule report spreadsheets. These areprocessed to calculate individual faculty loads, detect conflicts, produce visual schedules, trackunstaffed courses, banked credit, etc. More importantly, the analysis uses information about thestructure of the curriculum to support cohort oriented scheduling.The project has been implemented in Matlab using Tables. Although other platforms might bebetter suited to this type of data analysis, the use of Matlab makes it easier to modify and extendin Engineering schools. This is in major part due to the widespread use of Matlab inUndergraduate and Graduate curriculum. The programs described in
Engineering and Science (www.craftofscientificwriting.com) and the Assertion-Evidence Approach (www.assertion-evidence.com).Mrs. Melissa G. Kuhn, Old Dominion University Melissa G. Kuhn is a PhD Student in Educational Psychology and Program Evaluation at Old Dominion University. Additionally, she works at the Batten College of Engineering and Technology in educational projects and program coordination. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 1Work In Progress (WIP): Common Practices in Undergraduate Engineering Outreach Joanna K. Garner The Center for Educational
females than males and the samplewas representative of the class as a whole. The course consisted of in-class lecture deliveredthrough discussion of instructor notes. In-class assignments mainly consisted of individualhomework, individual design tasks, group projects, and test/quizzes. Lab periods were typicallyused for either additional lecturing or working on course assignments and projects. This paperreports on the first iteration of the designed intervention.For this study, students were given assessments of discipline specific and programming contentas well as surveys both before and after the designed intervention. Open-ended surveys weredesigned to capture student experiences with perceived benefits, challenges, and strategies
dimensions materials and the characterization and modeling of their material properties. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Work in Progress: The Attributes of a Prototypical Leader As Viewed by Undergraduate Engineering StudentsIntroductionThe professional development of leadership skills by undergraduate engineering students is keyto a successful long-term career. Increasing diversity and inclusion in leadership is also criticalfor technology companies as they become global enterprises. Within engineering education, theNational Science Foundation funded a multiyear research project lead by the American Societyof Engineering Education beginning in 2014 on “Transforming
focuses on various aspects of students’ develop- ment from novice to expert, including development of engineering intuition, as well as critical thinking, problem-solving, and communication skills. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Work-in-Progress: “Training Chemical Engineers as Technical Communicators”IntroductionThe ability to communicate effectively is a critical skill for engineers. Strong communicationskills are necessary for high-functioning engineering teams, successful projects, promotiveworkplace interactions, and career advancement. Engineering practitioners, educators, andstudents recognize communication as one of the key skills for
, he supports over 230 cadets in the ABET accredited systems engineering major. Systems Engineering is currently the largest engineering major at USAFA, administered by seven departments with cadets participating in over 30 engineering capstones projects. Trae received his undergraduate degree in Systems Engineering in 2012 from USAFA with a focus in Electrical Engineering. He is a distinguished graduate from the Air Force Institute of Technology receiving a Master of Science in Systems Engineering in 2018. Trae serves in the USAF as a developmental engineer and holds Department of Defense certifications in systems engineer- ing, science and technology management, test & evaluation, and program management. He
research project. During their sophomore year, theparticipating students learn the theoretical and practical knowledge required for their projects.They then outline the planning, objectives setting, data collecting, and analysis of their proposedproject. The end result is an oral and written presentation of their conducted research.Although Friction Stir Welding (FSW) is now an established and commercially available methodfor joining metals, there is a need for further improvement and investigation of new venues forresearch and development. Virginia State University owned a functioning FSW machine, alongwith material processing and testing facilities, to conduct studies on new manufacturingprocesses using this technology.One of the undergraduate
Engineering Education, 2019miniGEMS 2018: A Mixed Methods Study Exploring the Impact of a STEAM and Programming Camp on Middle School Girls’ STEM Attitudes Abstract miniGEMS (Girls in Engineering, Mathematics, and Science) is a free two-week summerSTEAM and programming camp for middle school girls launched in 2015. The goal ofminiGEMS is to address the female gender gap and introduce more female students into STEMfields through project-based learning experiences. This study utilized mixed methods to identifythe effectiveness of a STEM enrichment summer camp and explore how middle school girls’STEM attitudes changed after participating in miniGEMS. A pre- and post- survey wasconducted with 92
Technology Award. Dr. Salado holds a BSc/MSc in electrical engineering from Polytechnic Univer- sity of Valencia, an MSc in project management and a MSc in electronics engineering from Polytechnic University of Catalonia, the SpaceTech MEng in space systems engineering from Delft University of Technology, and a PhD in systems engineering from the Stevens Institute of Technology. He is a member of INCOSE and a senior member of IEEE and IIE.Mr. Andrew Katz, Purdue University, West Lafayette Andrew Katz is a doctoral candidate in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. He is working as a National Science Foundation graduate research fellow with a focus on engineering ethics education. He holds a B.S. in
questions: Likert scale, 6 2. Exam contribution to organizing research items ranging from strongly 3. Exam aiding to acquire information for research project disagree (1) to strongly 4. Exam broadening student knowledge agree (6) 5. Exam components well integrated with one another 6. Exam helping with PhD research plan 7. Exam instructions easy to follow 8. Exam being a worthwhile process Open-ended Your thoughts on the purpose of exam? Questions: Your suggestions for areas of improvement with the exam?Results and DiscussionA total of 56 doctoral candidates participated in
Resources Fellow, and a Shultz Humanitarian Engineering Fellow at the Colorado School of Mines (Mines). She holds BS and MS degrees in Petroleum Engineering from Mines, a JD from Loyola Uni- versity New Orleans School of Law, and a PhD in Environmental Science and Engineering from Mines. Prior to joining the Faculty at Mines, Linda served in various roles in the oil and gas industry including operations engineer, production engineer, attorney, and international negotiator for oil and gas project de- velopment. She teaches Properties of Reservoir Fluids, Petroleum Seminar, Field Session, Fossil Energy, Environmental Law and Sustainability, and Corporate Social Responsibility. In addition to teaching in the Petroleum
California, San Diego as postdoctoral fellow in the area of bioacoustics. He teaches dynamics, machine design, numerical methods and finite element methods. He has worked for the automotive industry in drafting, manufacturing, testing (internal combus- tion engines—power, torque and exhaust emissions, vibration fatigue, thermo-shock, tensile tests, etc.), simulations (finite element method), and as a project manager (planning and installation of new testing facilities). c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Design and validation of a bracket using laser scanner, topology optimization and a 3D printerIntroductionLaser scanners, topology optimization
Results Cafazzo et al. (2012) Positive Rose et al. (2013) Positive Stinson et al. (2013) PositiveCrowdsourcing: The word crowdsourcing is the combination of two words crowd andoutsourcing which means outsourcing to the crowd (Schenk et al., 2011). According to Howe(2006), “Crowdsourcing is the act of taking a job traditionally performed by a designated agent(usually an employee) and outsourcing it to an undefined, generally large group of people in theform of an open call.” Therefore, motivational factors have a great influence on participants totake part in crowdsourcing projects, namely, gamification
the ScLRprocess.The ScLR was broken into five stages: (1) identify the research questions, (2) identify relevantstudies, (3) study selection, (4) charting the data, and (5) collating, summarizing and reportingresults, closely following the methods outlined by Arksey and O'Malley [6]. These are iterativestages and expanded on in Table 1 below. Table 1 The Five Stages of a Scoping Literature Review Stage Objective Outcomes 1: Identify Research Determine scope of project and Inclusion and Exclusion Questions focus for search. Criteria 2: Identify Relevant Determine relevant sources of
Thermodynamics, Thermal Fluids Laboratory, and Guided Missiles Systems, as well as serving as a Senior Design Project Advisor for Mechanical Engineering Students. Her research interests include energy and thermodynamic related topics. Since 2007 she has been actively involved in recruiting and outreach for the Statler College, as part of this involvement Dr. Morris frequently makes presentations to groups of K-12 students, as well as perspective WVU students and their families. Dr. Morris was selected as a Statler College Outstanding Teacher for 2012, the WVU Honors College John R. Williams Outstanding Teacher for 2012, and the 2012 Statler College Teacher of the Year. ©American Society for
Paper ID #25514Board 26: What Features of the Problem Solving Studio Most Impact theStudents’ Experience?Miss Carmen Angelica Carrion, Georgia Institue of Technology Doctoral studies in Science Education. Specifically in informal settings and through the application of problem based and project based learning.Prof. Joseph M LeDoux, Georgia Institute of Technology Joe Le Doux is the Associate Chair for Undergraduate Learning and Experience in the Department of Biomedical Engineering at Georgia Tech and Emory University. Dr. Le Doux’s research interests in engineering education focus on problem-solving, diagrammatic reasoning
(t(25)= 1.54, p=0.07). The Out-of-Sequence group was also not different(t(20)= 1.50, p=0.076). As shown in Figure 4, this result shows that students not using the newcurriculum had a lower commitment to engineering at the end of the semester. This suggests thatthe new curriculum for both In- and Out-of-Sequence students may provide needed careersupport. This may be attributable to the design of the laboratories themselves, which focus onauthentic problems and require deliverables which are specific to the professional career contextof engineering.References[1] Crippen, K. J., Boyer, T. H., Wu, C.-Y., de Torres, T., Korolev, M., & Brucat, P. (2016). A Pilot Study of Project-Based Learning in General Chemistry for Engineers. Paper
Roughani is professor of physics and Associate Dean for the Natural and Applied Sciences at Loy- ola University Maryland. He is the PI on an NSF supported collaborative project, ”The PIPLINE Project”, aiming at enhancing Physics Innovation and Entrepreneurship (PIE) education. He also is leading the ”Pathways to Innovation” initiative at Loyola University Maryland. His expertise is on experimental con- densed matter physicist with emphasis on optical spectroscopy and Electron Microscopy of electronics and advanced materials. He established the very first ABET accredited Applied Physics program in the country while serving as department head the full co-op physics program at Kettering University prior to 2013
Paper ID #25715Board 81: Work-in-Progress: Building an Inclusive Faculty Community throughthe Teaching and Learning AcademyDr. Jianyu ”Jane” Dong, California State University, Los Angeles Jianyu Dong is a professor in electrical and computer engineering at CSULA and currently serves as the Associate Dean for the College of Engineering, Computer Science and Technology. Her area of expertise is video compression/communication, multimedia networks, QoS, etc. She has been engaged in multiple projects and initiatives in engineering education to increase the success of students from underserved low-income communities.Dr. Emily L
low dimensions materials and the characterization and modeling of their material properties. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019Research Initiation: A Study on the Intersection of Race and Gender on LeadershipFormation of Engineering StudentsThis NSF sponsored research initiation project explores the leadership beliefs, experiences, andknowledge/skills of undergraduate engineering students who have self-identified as havingleadership experience and that a Research I minority serving institution for Asian Americans andNative Americans, as well as a Hispanic Serving Institution. Undergraduate engineering studentswith self-identified leadership experience were recruited from the college of engineering
Integrated Class-Lab Approach to a Mechanics of Materials CourseIntroductionA Mechanics of Materials course offers rich opportunities for new theoretical understandings,development of laboratory skills, and small design projects. The three-year old Campbell Schoolof Engineering is promoting a class-lab approach in most of its courses. A traditional four creditlaboratory course might meet for three hours per week of lecture/recitation in a large section and2-3 hours per week of lab in smaller sections. In contrast, the class-lab meets for the sameamount of time but does not distinguish between lab and lecture time. In our case, we meet insections of 24 students in a room with six four-person tables surrounded by laboratory