: physically active students reviewingmaterials on a treadmill, or a parent multitasking with a carried baby sending a text message, forexample. These are examples of the application of principles of Universal Design for Learning(UDL), which due to space limitations we do not discuss further. See [13] for an introduction and[14] for a more recent accessibility-oriented discussion. Voice control of ClassTranscribe,discussed below, is planned for later 2019.During a live lecture, there is no option to replay recently missed information. A disengagedstudent, upon hearing an interesting phrase or completing a technology-based distraction ormental break, will attempt to re-engage and reconnect with the current lecture content andcontext. The attempt to
define the objectives of the course before setting any lesson plan. Then, rather thanusing pre-established structures for their course, they can determine the teaching elements thatwould be the most appropriate to reach those objectives. By continuing to move “backwards”, thetopics to be emphasized can be selected, and lastly, the content of each class can be set. Here, using backwards design, we adopt a hybrid approach, and present a multi-leveled activecourse. We created a new course structure that incorporates, in an engineering course, the activeelements that are traditionally used in business school curricula. By doing so, the “Fundamentalsof Nanobiotechnology and Nanobioscience” course aims to get students more involved andengaged in
establish an AP Engineeringcourse for American high school students have come many questions about the legitimacy ofsuch a plan. Questions about what to teach, how to grade student work and how to train teachersare some of the most prevalent. One universal question posed is: Can high school teachers, mostof whom are not engineers, effectively teach a college level introduction to engineering course? In this paper, we will examine longitudinal data documenting the success of the UA dual creditcourse, ENGR 102 HS. We will specifically tease out teacher effectiveness in relation to years inservice, and teacher/student gender match. Finally, we will examine teacher education comparingthose meeting the Higher Learning Commission (HLC) guidelines and
term project by completing several intermediate writing anddiscussion assignments. Intermediate writing assignments are brief, typically requiring fewerthan three pages. The goal is to encourage direct, specific responses to the assignment, makingthe student’s thinking as clear as possible. Development of more expansive text in the style of ajournal article comes later (primarily in Course 2). Typical assignments include the following: 1.Develop a list of preliminary readings and keywords; 2. Write and present a 1-page descriptionof the specific topic of the planned literature review; 3. Post, for class discussion, a recentresearch paper, and analyze it using the critical thinking framework; 4. Prepare and presentcritical summary and
. aligns recitation topics with lecture, structures class sessions well).• level of planning (e.g. comes prepared to class, knows the specific session material such as homework content before teaching it).• level of fairness (e.g. grades fairly, shows flexibility in extenuating circumstances).• clarity in teaching (e.g. frames lessons effectively, provides accessible explanations).• enthusiasm in teaching (e.g. shows excitement for topic, shows interest in student learning).The second coding pass identified all instances of these behaviors and put them in the context ofhow and why students thought those behaviors were important. The presence or absence of eachcode in each interview was tallied. This method was selected in lieu of
- facturing, Bioengineering, Material Science), and as Faculty in the engineering department for the past twenty seven years. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Paper ID #25116Industry experience: Consulting; since 1987; Had major or partial role in: I) performing research forindustry, DOE and NSF, and II) in several oil industry or government (DOE, DOD, and NSF) proposals.Performed various consulting tasks from USA for several oil companies (Jawaby Oil Service Co., WAHAOil and Oasis Co., London, England). The responsibilities included production planning, forecastingand reservoir maintenance. This production
learning compared with less academically successful students [37], [38].119 One important component of metacognition is the ability to plan, monitor, and evaluate learning. This is120 called self-regulated learning[39], [40]. As Zimmerman stated, self-regulated learning is about121 transforming “mental abilities into academic skills”[41]. Considering concepts such as Bloom’s122 taxonomy [42], students’ success can be fostered through direct instruction that challenges them to move123 from using lower-order to higher-order thinking on Bloom’s scale.124125 Promoting student metacognition includes instruction that explicitly helps students learn how to retain126 information, apply information to new situations, and skillfully and
Paper ID #25751Using CATME to Document and Improve the Effectiveness of Teamwork inCapstone CoursesMr. Behzad Beigpourian, Purdue University, West Lafayette Behzad Beigpourian is a Ph.D. student and Research Assistant in Engineering Education at Purdue Uni- versity. He earned his master’s in Structural Engineering from Shahid Chamran University in Iran, and his bachelor’s in Civil Technical Teacher from Shahid Rajaee Teacher Training University in Iran, Tehran. He has been official Technical Teacher at Ministry of Education in Iran from 2007 to 2018, and received many certificate in education such as Educational Planning
build on this semester? 5. What are your strengths in writing? What factored into your development of these strengths? 6. The start of semester reflection asked you to think about your greatest challenge regarding writing. Is that still a challenge, or has it changed? How did you tackle your writing challenges throughout the semester? 7. How do you plan to address these challenges in the spring semester? 8. What were your goal(s) for writing this semester? How did you meet them? (If not, how can you work on meeting them next semester?) 9. What are your writing goals for next semester? 10. What would you best accomplish these goals? List anything, including your own efforts and additional resources that
planned. Others have noted that team effectiveness theory from industrial andorganizational psychology may be helpful in dealing with student teams [4]. The instructor iscurrently collaborating with the School of Psychology at Florida Tech to evaluate team dynamicsand trust in aerospace capstone teams [10]; additional collaboration may yield insights on how tofurther improve the combination of time cards and instructor evaluations and to better preparestudent team leaders to deal with the challenges of holding their teams accountable. Another areaof forward work is to seek out other capstone instructors with large classes and an existing peerfeedback system who may be willing to experiment with the approach described here and toprovide an
; • scripting dialogue, song parodies, or simple puns to relate to the engineering material; • developing a physical model to demonstrate the engineering concept, often related to the theme; • when possible, adding props or pictures to enhance the classroom atmosphere; and • making references to the theme within the note handouts.Themed ClassesThe author managed to develop a curriculum plan with different individual themes for an entiresemester of Mechanics of Materials. The following ideas represent some of the more memorablethemes developed; a full listing is given in Table 1.First Day Rap BattleOn the first day of the course, students are asked to write eight lines of an engineering rap. Theinstructor gives them a list of terms from both
see projects completed fromstart to finish—I felt that allowing students to keep their respective designs would bestaccomplish these objectives. The cost of parts for each robot is shown in Figure, 23 arrangedfrom most expensive to least. These costs include shipping and, in most cases, were bought inlarge quantities from AliExpress [5]. I have found the parts to be of sufficiently high quality but,since the shipping time is about 6 to 8 weeks, planning ahead is very important. At just $35 perrobot, the Dean approved this expenditure and felt the remaining $65 was acceptable to maintainthe lab. Main PCB Board - Osh Park $ 6.72 Rubber Bands 2.5" x .5" $ 0.10 MG996R Servo Motor x2
). Intrinsic value, part of themotivational belief measure, refers to a student’s perception of the reasons for engaging in alearning task. Intrinsic value based reasons for engaging in a task include: curiosity, mastery, orfor the challenge of it. Self-regulation and strategy use comprise the learning strategies measure.Self-regulation refers to a combination of cognitive regulation; the use of planning andcomprehension monitoring, and effort regulation which consists of measuring a student’s abilityand willingness to persist at tasks. Strategic use indicates one’s ability to strategically implementpractices such as rehearsal, elaboration, and organization learning strategies [24, 29].The 20 students in the 2017 AcES cohort took the MSLQ survey at
described a level of mastery equal to what was expected of them at the end of the course,and a 5 was reserved for situations where they had prior knowledge that exceeded theexpectations of the course. The perceived need scale followed a similar pattern, with 1 meaningthat they did not anticipate needing this skill in future classes, a 2 indicating it might be useful tohave, but they could get by without it, a 3 indicating that they would likely see the content againbut would have an opportunity to relearn it as part of that new experience, a 4 indicating that thepreparation this class provided would aid them with future classes in the near future, and a 5indicating that this content area was directly related to their future career plans, and there
et al.’s study by offering more in-depth narratives of students’perspectives on reflection through semi-structured interviews.In our work, we captured narratives about students’ engagements with reflection, such as thenarratives shared by Boswell [8]. Boswell reports on a specific effort to support studentreflection during an experiential learning opportunity (an alternative spring break). Initially,Boswell’s team had planned highly structured, daily reflection activities. Over time, they learnedstudents had negative reactions to the trips’ structured reflections. Using the notion of the“structure trap” to capture the unintended consequences of over-structuring student reflection,Boswell goes on to explain how her team let go of a commitment
-cultural dimensions of pre-college engineering education. She received her M.A. and Ph.D. in Educational Studies from Emory University.Dr. Meltem Alemdar, Georgia Institute of Technology Dr. Meltem Alemdar is Associate Director and Senior Research Scientist at Georgia Tech’s Center for Education Integrating Science, Mathematics, and Computing (CEISMC). Dr. Alemdar has experience evaluating programs that fall under the umbrella of educational evaluation, including K-12 educational curricula, K-12 STEM programs after-school programs, and comprehensive school reform initiatives. Across these evaluations, she has used a variety of evaluation methods, ranging from a multi-level evalua- tion plan designed to assess program
nonlinear and iterative characteristic of the designprocess, though there were still about 20% of participants whose design process representationwas completely linear at the end of the course, indicating an area of improvement in the course.Another weakness in students’ understanding was found to be about the ‘Research’ phase in thedesign process. Many participants were not able to provide any specific details about this phaseat the end of the course, and for those who did provide specific details, their understanding aboutit is limited to ‘research existing solutions’.As for future work, the authors plan to address the weaknesses found in the course based onresults from the data analysis; collect more data to increase the total number of
. (1999). The Project Manager’s Desk Reference: A Comprehensive Guide to Project Planning, Scheduling, Evaluation, and System. New York: McGraw-Hill.Meadows, D. H. (2008). Thinking in systems. White River Junction, VT: Chelsea Green Publishing, 77-78.Midgley, G. (2003). Science as Systemic Intervention: Some Implications of Systems Thinking and Complexity for the Philosophy of Science. Systemic Practice and Action Research. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022833409353Repenning, N. P., Sweeney, L. B., & Stroh, P. D. (2000). Leveraging Change: The Power of Systems Thinking in Action: COMMENTS. REFLECTIONS-SOCIETY FOR ORGANIZATIONAL LEARINING, 2(2), 51-66.Stroh, D. P. (2015). Systems thinking for social change
job to make sure people know how to use and dispose of themproperly.”Several students were struck by the need to address the problem of e-waste at the design stage,combatting planned obsolescence.“Over all going there and seeing all of the electronic waste just makes me want to be anengineer who is good at future proofing technology.”“As an engineer I should be developing electronics that can adapt to the growing demands ofsociety instead of designing electronics that are meant to be replaced as soon as they come outto stores because they are already obsolete.”“Professionally, this makes me want to look into ways to improve the recycling process. If aprocess was able to be created that could recycle e-waste faster than it was produced
research (DBR) study[22], [23]. DBR is a method that allows researchers to test their hypotheses about how learningcan be supported by conducting iterative cycles of classroom-based study. In this method, thecourse instructor typically collaborates with a learning scientist to document and analyze theimpact of carefully planned instruction. Each cycle provides an opportunity to evaluate how theinstruction did or did not support learning as intended. This study, therefore, builds on findingsfrom the previous two iterations.Participants & settingThe participants included 56 students in 10 teams enrolled in a sophomore-level materials andenergy balances course, a core course in the chemical engineering program at a Hispanic-servingresearch
understanding the People work better and feel Knowing about the design I am planning on studying engineering design process, better when they feel included process makes it possible to aerospace engineering. In I will have a fuller in the process of learning, such re-define a complex my field, I will be designing understanding of
successful union of art into the sciences. The first showcase will be at the AmericanPhysical Society, Division of Fluid Dynamics, as an education symposia lecture. Another plan isto present this work as a workshop at Lilly Conferences that provides opportunities for thepresentation of the scholarship of teaching and learning. With more historical background, thiscould present the developments within fluid mechanics against the backdrop of scientificdevelopment.In April 2015, the University Faculty Senate (UFS) at Penn State University approved a newIntegrative Studies requirement within General Education; implementation details wereapproved in March of 2016. This requirement applies to students who start at Penn StateUniversity during or after the
, staff, and resources within the BME department. It was great to get to know the people behind the scenes and to give feedback in various ways throughout the summer. As a result of my CPM position I was included in many planning and feedback sessions and found myself with new leadership opportunities and visibility in the department. The CPM program was crucial to my college development and has led to many other opportunities.”Likely, this is because CPMs were given opportunities to participate in teaching facultyinterviews, work with staff (e.g. IT, facilities), and provide their input on the BME design space. Other Skills/Knowledge Acquired as a CPM I have a deeper understanding of
student sense-making and instructor responsiveness to thissense-making, answering our second research question.Future WorkWe are planning much future work that employs the TENOR Protocol to address the content ofquestion-initiated dialogue and, eventually, responsive teaching in engineering science courses.First, we will apply the TENOR Protocol to a different set of classroom data than was used todevelop the protocol. During the Fall 2018 semester we conducted 21 observations of 7 differentengineering science courses. These courses range from 200- to 400-level across fivedepartments. After transcribing question-initiated dialogue from the lecture capture video ofthese 21 class meetings, we will code these utterances and use this data set to
, 66(6), pp.888~898.[21] China Ministry of Education official website http://www.moe.gov.cn/srcsite/A08/s7056/201803/t20180329_331767.html[22] Barriball K L, While A. Collecting data using a semi-structured interview: a discussion paper.[J]. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 2010, 19(2):328-335.[23] Kolbe R H, Burnett M S. Content-analysis research: An examination of applications with directives for improving research reliability and objectivity.[J]. Journal of Consumer Research, 1991, 18(2):243-250.[24] Zhang Lei, Wang Chen. A comparative study of public policy issues in urban planning between China and the United States based on content analysis [j]. Urban Development Research, 2011, 18(11): 33 - 38.[25] Miles M B
given a unique hint meant to simulate therole of different perspectives on problem solving. For example, one hint asked students toconsider the effect of the moving crane load on the maximum shear and moment experienced bythe crane rail. Another hint gave students design tables from the AISC Manual of Steel Designand guidance to help them pick an appropriate shape. Teams completed the assignment outsideof class as homework. Plan View (view from above) Section View (view from end) 35 ft. 35 ft. Hoist is free to move Hoist
… and then yes it's going pretty well I think”In addition, even though the project courses ‘’advertised’’ the freedom of students, studentswere bounded to several limitations in terms of project planning, externally imposed deadlinesand mandatory feedback meetings. “I think if you, we go very often to these meeting, because we think they are important and we want to ask questions and it's nice to have time that we all sit together, however if it's not necessary ,then I feel that it's not really useful..if you have to go, so that's why I like the freedom”Perceived competence of students in project based coursesFor students in project course, sense of competence was a result of being equipped withadequate knowledge in
, will be two closing ceremonies; one for the attendees and aseparate one for the presenters. In the closing ceremony for the presenters, each member will berecognized and will receive a "Certificate of Presenter" and a letter of recommendation signed bythe directors of the programs. The OST programs from both universities have the goal topromote teens to pursue careers in the STEAM field. Anecdotal data confirm two importantpoints: 1) many of the presenters enrolled in the OST program offers them the possibility to be apresenter and explore STEAM topics, and 2) many of the presenters at the STEAM conferencehad indicated that they want to pursue careers in STEAM and they plan to apply to STEAM-oriented high schools or STEAM-oriented
. The child shows that he is planning to consider them and even restates some of thecriteria. He explores the loop and tries to assemble it to use it which also shows that he isconsidering the criteria; we consider this to be problem scoping rather than solution modelingbecause he seems to be engaged in exploring the problem criteria and materials available moreso than creating a specific solution. He realizes the constraint of having only one loop and healso seems to know that without the loop he cannot solve the problem as it is one of his criteria. Narrative 7. Mom tells John, “Think about the rollercoasters we have been on, how do they work?” John responds, “They always go up first and should start very high. All go very
, because you know, it's never going to go 100 percentto plan.” Similarly, a student responded with, “It's nice to feel that push from professors toincorporate the use of the space in their classes, to let us know that it's okay to experiment and itis okay to do it once and okay if it doesn't come out how you wanted it to.”In the space the students were almost always working in teams, particularly on assigned projects.The communication, collaboration, and interactions are aligned with the norms and practices ofprofessional engineers. Thus, the space reinforces student development of a professionalidentity. The autonomy and support for the students in the space further provides them with theopportunity to internalize the opportunity to gain the