preparinga competent and skilled workforce to meet the manufacturing’s needs. Following an intensecurriculum review of competencies within the Advanced Manufacturing specialization of theAssociate of Science (A.S.) Degree in Engineering Technology, a survey for industry wasdeveloped by Polk State College (PSC), in partnership with FloridaMakes, the Florida Forum forEngineering Technology (ET Forum) and FLATE (Florida Advanced Technological EducationCenter of Excellence). The survey was designed to check the alignment of the CurriculumFrameworks and Benchmarks of the A.S. Degree [1] with industry’s identified needs as well ascaptured both an importance level and frequency of use for each. All standards and benchmarkswere translated to competencies
Academic Department: A Case StudyAbstractLean approaches to continuous improvement, originally practiced and perfected by ToyotaMotor Company, have been widely used in the industry sector for many decades. There is agrowing trend at universities to adopt lean practices to improve higher education processes.Reduced financial support and growing competition amongst universities and academicprograms motivate the implementation of lean practices both at university and departmentlevels.1 Colleges and universities that have adopted lean practices are driven by the need tostrategically leverage resources to meet stakeholder expectations, reduce waste or costs, andimprove satisfaction with under-performing processes.2 This paper presents an overview of
ProcessIntroductionGraduates from ABET accredited engineering programs are expected to demonstrate an ability tocommunicate effectively [1-2]. Developing students’ technical writing skills are particularlydifficult to teach and more time consuming to assess [3], often limiting the number of opportunitiesstudents have to practice and improve throughout their undergraduate education. While recentstudies have shown positive impacts of using rubrics to measure student scientific writing skills[2-5], little has been reported regarding the cumulative impacts of a structured student writingproces. Here we expand on previous work, which introduced a student technical writing processand presented preliminary data supporting improvements in students’ technical writing skills
Engineers. In his fi- nal year of academia, Nicholas worked with Professor Kaw as an undergraduate research and learning assistant for a numerical methods course to study the effectiveness of flipped classrooms with adaptive learning. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Integrating adaptive learning lessons in a flipped STEM course: development, outcomes, and data analyticsIntroductionThe flipped classroom is currently a popular pedagogy [1] as it is believed to improve studentengagement, create self-regulation of learning, and establish habits for life-long learning [2]. Inaddition, the increased amount of in-class active learning created by the implementation of
-based study. Nevertheless, Cox acknowledges two elements critical toactive learning: (1) introducing student activity into the traditional lecture, and (2) promotingstudent engagement. Further, university structures and administrative obligations (e.g. ABETrequirements; department mandated course, content, and sequencing constraints; or adherence tocross-section uniformity) can also present barriers to change and experimentation by instructorswithin particular courses.This paper rests on the premise that political discussion and thinking around civic engagement isgermane to the work that engineers do, and critical for faculty to incorporate into classroomspaces. The study presented here explores a partnership at Tufts University between the
postsecondary enrollment in college (and by default engineering) including: 1) proximity to post-secondary schooling, 2) parent and family background (typical work in the area), 3) tuition support programs, 4) funding or program availability at the high school, and 5) the role of counselors and teachers. Although common in name, these factors are generally experienced differently at the different schools with a few similarities. Our project demonstrates that it is imperative to address issues of broadening participation froma systemic perspective in consultation with state-level partners in the Department of Education.We offer ideas for engaging school districts as well as state agency partners that should be ofinterest to
recognized as a key factor in the developmentof a positive college culture and a productive teaching and learning environment [1]. However, theindependent nature of faculty work as well as the segmented institutional structure has led to theprevalence of academic silos. In addition, with the changing landscape and budgets of institutionsof higher education, adjunct faculty who are hired through temporary contracts are playing anincreasingly important role in undergraduate education. In the College of Engineering, ComputerScience, and Technology (ECST) at Cal State LA, more than 50% of courses are taught by adjunctfaculty, many of whom are current or former working professionals. Clearly the work experienceand expertise of the adjunct faculty is a
SETs, which committee members reviewedprior to the working meeting. The current SET questions first were reviewed, and theniteratively each member suggested potential questions, based on the literature, and categorizedthem. Each potential question was systematically reviewed and evaluated using a rubric, goingthrough each SET category. The simple rubric supported objective review and discussion of thepotential questions using two criteria (what students are able to evaluate and the usefulness toinstructor) and a rating scale of 2=yes, 1=maybe, and 0=no. The rationale of the ratings anddiscussion comments also were noted on the rubric. To close the loop, the committee presentedthe recommendations to the deans and Faculty Senate members at the
Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Sustaining Change: Embedding Research Outcomes into School Practices, Policies and NormsWith an NSF Revolutionizing Engineering and Computer Science Departments (RED) grant, theSchool of Chemical, Biological and Environmental Engineering seeks to create (1) a culturewhere everyone in the CBEE community feels valued and that they belong, and (2) to create alearning environment that prompts students and faculty to meaningfully connect curricular andco-curricular activities and experiences to each other and to professional practice. We aim tohave students connect what they learn to the context of their lives, identities, and emergingcareers. We want CBEE graduates to be
. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Lessons learned: A three-office partnership to engage graduate TAs with mental health trainingIntroductionOne in five adults age 18–25 in the U.S. has a diagnosable mental illness [1], and a recentinternational study suggests that graduate students are six times more likely than the generalpopulation to experience depression and anxiety [2]. These trends compel colleges anduniversities to improve how they prepare and support graduate students in managing mentalhealth challenges for themselves, their peers, and the students whom they serve as teachingassistants (TAs).We share lessons from the collaborative design and implementation of an interactive
other materials areas [1].FMMI at the USF is devoted to interdisciplinary fundamental and manufacturing research andeducation on materials which have the potential to solve significant problems in energy,sustainability, human health, and national security. FMMI achieves this through a collaborativeinstitute with faculty members and researchers from the sciences, engineering, and medicine.Educational activities include an interdisciplinary MS program and a certificate program inMSE. Outreach activities involving K-12 activities, undergraduate research, and teacher-trainingprograms are also integrated into the fabric of FMMI vision.The overall research goals of FMMI are to: • take bottom-up and top-down approaches that exploit interactions
ResponsibilityIntroductionThis research aims to address the global initiative to increase diversity in the engineering workforce [1]. The U.S. military Veteran student population was identified as one of the most diversestudent groups in engineering; however, discontinue and dismissal rates of Veteran students inengineering were significantly higher than traditional engineering students in the U.S. [2]. TheseVeteran students hold identifiable traits that differ from traditional engineering students who areunder the age of 24 and financially dependent on their parents [3]. While a significant effort byinstitutions across the country have been made in engineering student retention, many of theseefforts have focused on traditional students. This research seeks to fill
well as difficulty navigatingnew expectations and interactions with faculty and other students [1]. It has been observed thatover 50% of students that leave college prior to graduating do so between their first and secondyears at the institution [2, 3]. The University of Pittsburgh studied attrition of engineeringstudents and found that half of the first-year students that left their program had been placed onacademic probation at the end of their first term [4]. Although interventions can help studentsafter they have been placed on academic probation, the driving force for the development of thelearning skills modules at Grand Valley State University (GVSU) was to provide students withthe skills to succeed prior to experiencing academic
, increase persistence rates both within degree programsand into the workforce. The initial study on student beliefs and endorsements wascompleted in 2017 and the video production intervention was piloted in 2018. At the time ofthe 2019 ASEE annual conference, the data analysis on the intervention will be completeand will be presented at the poster session.2. Background Goal-Congruity Theory (GCT) states that people are more likely to pursue a career thataffords the values they endorse (Diekman, 2010). From the perspective of a student, thereare two places that values are important: 1) what values does a student personally holddear? and 2) what opportunities does a student believe a given career provides for? Whenthese two types of values are
Engineering at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.The training is to be applicable to all types of GTA contexts: lab, discussion, and lecture. Becausemany of our engineering students’ career goals are within non-academic settings, students oftenhave little natural motivation to develop effective pedagogical skills. As explained in our previouspaper 1 , the team made a strategic decision to combine the teaching of leadership skills and peda-gogical skills in order to appeal to GTAs who plan to go into non-academic careers. In this paper,we will present our logic model for the iELITE program, which has four categories of inputs:GTAs, Engineering Faculty, Administration (College and Departments), and External Partners (in-dustry sponsors
, full implementation, program administration, andfuture plans.Introduction For the past few decades, there have been numerous calls to improve education in theUnited States from cradle to career. Of particular importance is the demand for better STEM(science, technology, engineering and mathematics) educational programs at all levels. Whilenumerous programs have been implemented across the country to address STEM education,there is still much more to be done in order to meet the STEM workforce growth, to close theperformance gap for underrepresented minorities, and the rectify the lack of quality STEMteachers [1]. The growth of science and engineering employment opportunities is predicted tooutpace the growth of jobs in general [2], thus
students that pulls knowledgefrom the journalism and performing arts community. Our program has three specificcomponents: (1) creating jargon-less podcasts; (2) receiving training from an improvisationalactor on stage presence; and (3) presenting at “curiosity cafes” to audiences from the generalpublic. This paper will present the design of the curriculum including the overarching theoreticalframework, programmatic issues, and recruiting. This paper will be of interest to faculty thatwish to improve graduate student oral communication skills and are seeking novel programs thatare being pilot tested at other universities.IntroductionThe effective communication of science to the general public is increasingly important as oursociety continues to
experience for thesynthesis and integration of prior engineering content knowledge [1]. It may have implication onthe disciplinary approach to teaching and learning, as well as how different educationalexperience and interventions in the classroom may advance learning. With an ultimate goal offacilitating more effective teaching and learning of design [2], this study proposes thedevelopment of methods to assess engineering understanding [3], conceptions of engineering anddesign, and an assessment framework for design learning. For the purposes of this study wedifferentiate between design and engineering ways of knowing, thinking and doing (problemformulation and problem solving), and design and engineering learning (focused on change inthe student’s
, improve communications, and increasetolerance for ambiguity. Researchers have revealed the benefits of engaging educators andprofessionals in innovative strategies to increase cultural awareness and competency skills [1].Numerous studies contain evidence that organizations with effective understanding of differentbusiness cultures in different countries have the capacity to transform business practices. Thechanges lead to distinctive commercial practices as demonstrated by the broad internationalpresence of Coca-Cola, Starbucks, and McDonalds corporations [9][25][43][49]. Businessleaders lacking cultural understanding are less likely to survive as indicated by the failure ofWalmart expansion in Germany [35]. This paper discusses American role in
1 below gives an example of smallUDI codes. Figure 1: Small sample UDI codes on PEEK materialEquipment Laser Marking Unit - Keyence MD-X1500,3-axis hybrid model. Software - Marking Builder 3.While these are the components that were used, the main intent of this paper is to discusspossible approaches to marking quality that could be easily applied to any piece of equipment. Itis, therefore, less important to me what was used to create these particular markings that will bediscussed, because the end deliverable is intangible. Gained knowledge that can be applied to awide variety of situations, equipment types, brand names, or even engineering disciplines is theadded value that I hope to be able to give the
Who of Asian Americans. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Support Remote Collaboration in Virtual Computer Labs1. IntroductionComputer labs are commonly used in computing education to help students reinforce theknowledge obtained in classrooms and to gain hands-on experience on specific learning subjects.While traditional computer labs are based on physical computer centers on campus, more andmore virtual computer lab systems (see, e.g., [1, 2, 3, 4]) have been developed that allowstudents to carry out labs on virtualized resources remotely through the Internet. Virtualcomputer labs make it possible for students to use their own computers at home, instead ofrelying on computer centers
. He is currently a professor and head of the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at Colorado State University. He is a fellow of IEEE. A complete vita is available at: http://www.engr.colostate.edu/ ˜aam. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019What Engineering Students Think About How They Learn Professional SkillsTo promote better engineering education within the United States, in 2004, the NationalAcademy of Engineering launched The Engineer of 2020 project [1]. This project ushered in anew era of engineering education by emphasizing not only technical skill development, but alsothe development of critical social skills needed for engineers to be successful in an
hurdles, including curriculum development, selection of textbooks, the development ofonline labs, and novel approaches to linking program content to courses. Informal feedback fromindustry indicates students know what they need to know to be successful. The adaptation of theUbD pedagogy was crucial to the development of the program and we believe it could be usedsuccessfully by others.IntroductionAn interdisciplinary group of university faculty worked together in a Faculty LearningCommunity to study a pedagogy called Understanding by Design (UbD). We then implementedit in our university courses. Results were reported in [1].Just as we were completing this study, I was tasked with developing a new program inManufacturing Engineering Technology
organizing and participating in the educational outreach programs such as science summer camps for middle school and high school girls. Before coming to UIUC, she was Associate Pro- fessor at the Eastern Illinois University where she mentored female and minority students in science and mathematics. She was Founding Chair and Mentor for the Women in Science and Mathematics (WISM) Initiative and Minority Mentoring in Mathematics and Sciences (M3S). c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Work in Progress: Introducing Bioengineering Approaches through Healthcare Grand ChallengesIntroductionAs the landscape of health and medicine is changing [1-2], we seek to
assessment of the learning gains using direct measures.The theoretical framing for this project is Cognitive Flexibility Theory (CFT), which Spiro et alsuggested as a means to help students learn in complex and ill-structured domains [1]. Whilethere has been recent discussion of CFT in the literature, there is no clear consensus on adefinition of cognitive flexibility or how it is directly measured, particularly in complexproblem-solving situations such as engineering design. One common definition of cognitiveflexibility is the ability to switch between thinking about two different concepts and being able tothink about multiple concepts simultaneously (for example, multiple design criteria or constraintsin an engineering problem or multiple
assessment of support provided to undergraduate students in STEM(science, technology, engineering, and mathematics), such an instrument will aid STEMeducators and college administrators in monitoring progress and identifying unmet needs in localenvironments, thereby providing data-driven evidence for targeted interventions. In thisexecutive summary, we present: 1) an overview of the instrument development process; 2) anevaluation of the prototype for face and content validity; and 3) a revised instrument and pilotdata to determine test validity and reliability across varied institutional contexts.Project OverviewWe began the instrument development process with theoretical constructs from the model of co-curricular support (MCCS), which is a
. Her experiences as a student and educator contributed to her support of learning settings where students’ diverse backgrounds are valued and included in the curriculum. Currently, she is a Ph.D. candidate in Literacy/Biliteracy at the University of Texas at El Paso engaging in research on students’ experiences in bilingual programs from their own voices and perspectives. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Latinx Persistence in and Beyond the Degree: Intersections of Gender and Ethnicity Hispanic-serving institutions [HSIs], which enroll almost half of Hispanic studentsattending college [1], HSIs represent less than 6% of
police, andadministrators in universities around the country. Since the enactment of Arkansas Act 562,permitting the concealed carrying of handguns on university campuses, little research has beenconducted to investigate students’ perceptions of risk associated with the new law. Therefore, thepurpose of this study is twofold: (1) to investigate whether engineering students’ perceptions ofrisk of an active shooter event occurring on campus and their stated intention to obtain aconcealed-carry license differ from other students on campus, and (2) to determine what factorspredict students’ stated intention to obtain a concealed-carry license. The investigator employeda survey of undergraduate engineering and education students (N = 89) in a four
; as well as consultingtwo underrepresented minority undergraduate engineering students, one male and one female,who were leaders in their engineering societies and who did not take part in the study. Thecoding of the interviews was done by the principal investigator. The first transcript was coded bythe principal investigator and the social scientists were in consensus with the initial codes. Theinterviews were structured around three themes: 1) Who are leaders (society, technology, etc.)and what are their attributes? 2) What inspired the engineering undergraduate student to take onleadership roles and the lessons learned and/or skills developed from these experiences? Theirself-selected social identities (e.g. race, gender, socioeconomic