was intended to be arefresher of selected curriculum design models and an enhancer of evidence-based teachingpractices. The workshops blended learning theories, formative assessment strategies, activelearning techniques, and effective use of technologies that teachers could experience and takeback to their own class. Each workshop was approximately two hours. The topics covered by theworkshop series include: (1) Team building activity, (2) Reflections on engineering education,(3) Curriculum standards, (4) TPACK design framework [8] and the Backward Design model[9], (5) Raising meaningful questions and engineering challenge, (6) Writing measurablelearning objectives, (7) Formative and summative assessment strategies, (8) The art ofstorytelling
engineering edu- cation, the professional formation of engineers, the role of empathy and reflection in engineering learning, and student development in interdisciplinary and interprofessional spaces.Dr. Stephen Secules, Purdue University-Main Campus, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Paper ID #27026 Stephen received a PhD in education at the University of Maryland researching engineering education. He has a prior academic and professional background in engineering, having worked professionally as an acoustical engineer. He has taught an
are trained technically, with less focus on critical examinationsof assumptions within engineering practice, and less emphasis on the larger contexts in whichengineering is embedded. With funding from an NSF IUSE/PFE Revolutionizing EngineeringDepartments (RED) grant, our School of Engineering is "revolutionizing" engineering education,with the aim of preparing students to innovate engineering solutions developed within acontextual framework that embeds humanitarian, sustainable and social justice approaches withtechnical engineering skills [1]. This requires an enhanced curriculum with a focus on studentteamwork, a greater consideration of social and economic factors, improved communication withdiverse constituents, and reflection on an
writing and further clarifies and improves the understanding the source code from anoutside perspective. A second level of classification is still needed to further classify sufficientcomments into their own categories. These include conceptual, reflective, organizational andliteral comment types. This classification system is further documented in a previous work [3].2. Cleaning and Processing the DataThe data set for this investigation comes from six sections of an Introduction to Programmingcourse; two sections (section 05 and section 08) are writing-to-learn to program sections and theadditional four sections are taught using the traditional lab approach. The training set consists of761 comments with 30% randomly sampled out as the test data
undergraduate engineering student, and an undergraduate teacher educationstudent. The STEM Stories afterschool program began in September and ran through April. Itmet twice a week for two hours each day at the school.EVALUATIONThe evaluation was approved by the UD’s Institutional Review Board (IRB). The evaluationincluded pre- and post- survey data, attendance data, and reading scores.Participants: Fifty-five grade 2 and 3 students registered for the afterschool program.Attendance records reflect that six students attended between 66% and 100% of the time; fourstudents attended between 51 and 65% of the time, eight students attended between 31 and 50%of the time, and 37 students attended between 0 – 30% of the time. The school has a 54 %minority
observations and interventions in a system,explaining that ideal observations are not impacted by the observer and won’t be used to promotechange. Since we will reflect on our purposeful observations (interviews), a potential result ofthis process is to promote and implement change, making our data collection process acombination of both observation and intervention (Midgley, 2003). While we hope to fully andaccurately portray the system to analyze it, the observer (interviewer) must be careful not toinfluence the thoughts and expertise of the stakeholder (interviewee). If interviewees areexplaining an ideal system as opposed to the actual system that we want to analyze, theeffectiveness of this systems thinking process significantly decreases
everything that can be learned is transferable, such as psychomotor skills, cognitiveskills, affective attitudes, methods, principles, theories, facts, concepts, relationships, structures,among others[6]. Therefore, universities should prepare integral professionals that articulateglobal knowledge, professional knowledge and work experiences, and recognize the needs andproblems of society to create sustainable and effective solutions. Competencies are the set ofskills, behaviors, and abilities that allow people to reflect on an action and know how to act whensituations are faced, even if the situation occurs in a new context [7]. Since they play a key rolein the process we decided to focus on competencies to better understand transfer of
thedesign cycle [4]. However, few studies have explicitly examined student learning through thelens of the knowledge and practice expectations of a 21st century engineer [14]. Yet, 21st centuryskills have been embraced by the Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET)and are included in the standards for engineering programs [15]. The 21st century skills includecollaboration and teamwork, creativity, communication, emotional competency, culturalcompetency, ethics, leadership and management, critical thinking, and content knowledge. Afundamental shift in the ABET engineer paradigm with the adoption of the 21st centuryframework reflects a focus on engineers as being at the service to society. The ABET standardssuggest that there is
refer toall those involved in the teaching process for this paper including professors at rank, instructors,and teaching assistants. The operational team aims to develop a quality-oriented teaching culturein the recently launched university. The ISW implemented with recourse to the vision of theprogram and with the support from admin and development of a core team of staff memberstrained leads to better teaching processes evidenced from both qualitative (teacher interviews)and quantitative (survey results) methods.The ISWThe Instructional Skills Workshop (ISW) is designed to encourage reflective practice and toassist participants in developing their teaching and feedback skills. The underlying principles ofthe ISW include: participatory
throughprocesses of community-building, organizing, and education, creating transformativeexperiences in democratic and reflective spaces that directly address root causes. This mayinclude every-day actions such as cooking, gardening, building, establishing space, as well asperformance and creative output.In conversation with Highlander’s practices of creative resistance and agency building, we alsotake from the foundational work of Imarisha Walidah and Adrienne Maree Brown regarding thepractice of emergent strategies for community organizing and enacting change [16]. Brown andWalidah have established the technique of future visioning through the writing of science fictionnarratives that enable social critique as well as creative resistance and playful
teaching plan to incorporate what they learned into their own teaching. Atthe end of the academic year, faculty participants are tasked with completing a final reflection. Inthis paper, we will report the content of the workshops as related to the overarching goals of theISE-2 program, along with how the coffee conversation topics complemented the workshopmaterial. Lastly, we will explore the role of the teaching plans and final reflections in changinginstructional practices.IntroductionImproving Student Experiences to Increase Student Engagement (ISE-2) focuses on a facultydevelopment program designed to reduce implicit bias and increase active learning in order toincrease underrepresented minority (URM), women, and first-generation students
various stakeholders’ views of the field’s nature and competencies it requires?2) To what extent do these models reflect Tufte’s principles of effective visual communication?Literature ReviewStakeholders who create competency models choose a means of visual communication overtextual communication. In this section, we will discuss possible reasons for and benefits of thesechoices define and explore visual communication,Visual CommunicationVisual communication models are derived from basic linear communication models posed byAristotle (speaker, message, listener) and Lasswell [4] as shown in Figure 1.Figure 1. Basic communication model [5]Lasswell’s linear model reads as “Who says what in which channel to whom with what effect?”This basic model
faculty or vice versa. We decided that it was mostimportant to have motivated and engaging faculty members for the course; on the other hand, webelieved that every faculty member can relate their area of expertise to the Cyber World. Hence,after forming our instructor-team, we sat down to find overlaps between their areas of expertiseand cyber issues. This resulted in a lecture series of 8 topics developed and delivered by facultyfrom four colleges: the College of Arts and Sciences, the College of Business, the TagliatelaCollege of Engineering, and the Henry C. Lee College of Criminal Justice and ForensicScience.Each of the topics is summarized below and reflects the instructor’s expertise under the umbrellaof Cyber World (topics are in order):1
conduct mutual interview through which they developboth reflective and reflexive understanding toward each other’s profession, cultures as well as biasduring the communication. The paper is organized in four parts. First, it reviews engineering education in the US andChina, identifying their ontological foundations and differences/similarities in terms ofpedagogies, curriculum and objectives. Seconds, it introduces the design and implementation ofthe Global Classroom in the context of US-China trade war, in particular, how teaching moduleswere concocted to situate ethics discussion in the world with growing hostility, and how themutual interview between US/Chinese students along with the self-evaluation of bias were builtinto the
may indicate that engineering students’ education narrowed to amore technical focus in later years of the curriculum.In-college international involvement related to SRBeyond courses, students and alumni described other international experiences that impactedtheir views of social responsibility. Reflecting back on his involvement in EWB, Sam noted: [EWB] was a way to use my...my engineering skills to help people; I think that was... a big goal of mine … I think I've kind of always just had a sense of, like, I've been given a lot and fortunate to, like, have a good education and those kinds of things, and that part of my responsibility is to do stuff to help other people who maybe haven't had that kind of opportunity. And I think
programs, especially as they are scaled, is critical to demonstrating impact to help makethe case to faculty and administrators on the benefits and potential in engineering. Data can takemany forms including evaluations of student products, interviews and observations and feedbackfrom alumni reflecting back on their experience after graduation. Self-reported studentevaluation and reflections on learning are other forms of data captured in many classrooms.This paper examines student evaluation and self-reported learning over 23 years as onecommunity-engagement program has grown significantly. Where there are clearly limits to theself-reported data, it does offer an insight into the student experience. The paper analyzes thestudent evaluation data
the originalRFP and how to structure the small group sections to provide the guiding students needed tocomplete the project, as well as how the assessment of the activity was performed. Then, we willpresent our reflections as instructors of the activity and our impressions of the students’ work.Finally, we will present the students’ impressions of the activity and industry judges’ perceptionsof student group presentations.Activity Preparation Both course managers decided that they wanted some type of integration activity at theend of the semester. The RFQ activity was chosen as a logical mid-program preparation for theRFP activity that students are required to do during their capstone course. One of the coursemanagers reached out at
’ ethical formation. Theresearch question that we seek to address is, “In what different ways and to what extent doesparticipation in departmental engineering and science courses cultivate STEM students’ ethicalformation?” We define ethical formation in terms of several skills and dispositions, includingempathy [10], civic-mindedness [11], and ethical reasoning [12].This study is part of a larger project that strives to explore the effectiveness of integratingcommunity-engaged pedagogy and ethical reflection in the science and engineering curriculum[13]. During the 2018-2019 academic semesters, a subset of faculty from the courses surveyed inthis study participated in a faculty learning community focused on ethics instruction andcommunity-engaged
of cash on hand at the end of a round, typically timed to about 20-30 minutes, with noresidual value for unsold inventory. Vehicles intended to be sold must identically match a masteror blueprint provided to each team at the start of a round. The customer can reject a sale for anyquality defects such as missing components, misplaced components, or incompletely attachedcomponents. The penalty for non-quality should be quite large as it reflects warranty costs in thereal world which can be very significant [16]. Quality defects can lead either to confiscation,financial penalty, or return of the vehicle to the manufacturer for warranty service.3.2 Physical Components: LEGO Brick VehiclesVehicles require about 20-40 individual LEGO brick parts
working on his Master’s in Civil Engineering. Mr. Fulk’s current research and interests reside in the preparation of future leaders of the construction industry. He has spent time evaluating current practices, cataloging industry needs, and reflecting on how students learn by digesting research provided in the field of Engineering Education.Mr. Seyedali Ghahari, Purdue University-Main Campus, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Ali graduated in B.Sc. Railway Engineering from IUST in 2011, and received his M.Sc. in Construc- tion Engineering and Management from AUT in 2013. He received his second M.Sc. in Construction Materials from Purdue in 2016. Ali has been a researcher at the Concrete Technology and Durability
, supports course completionthat reflects an indirect gauge to retention and facilitates understanding complex engineeringconcepts through technological simulations.Introduction and MotivationThe President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology encourages developinginnovative teaching practices, to improve student retention and enhance their learningexperiences [1]. Research reveals that STEM and building sciences are taught in astraightforward way based on fragmented concepts rather than embracing technology andcreative problem solving skills [2]. Although problems related to innovative pedagogies thattrain STEM students have been enhanced through for example vertically integrating courses thatsupport students learning and trainings [3
projectswhile also facilitating connections across teams and providing customized academic changefaculty development curriculum.While much of the translation of research to practice literature is in the health promotion andclinical medicine fields, the findings are still relevant for organizational change research.Research indicates that some of the translation problems result because the information shareddoes not reflect an understanding of contextual factors and/or is not deemed to have externalvalidity [4]. Given that REDPAR research is focused on many types of organizations thatreceived RED grants, and the research broadly addresses themes among these contexts, we canwrite tipsheets to help other change agents understand basic propositions/themes
several promising LGBTQ-inclusive behaviors.MethodsIn spring 2017, the researchers conducted an online survey with the Leadership Community inorder to measure and document progress, satisfaction and outcomes for the VCP community.The members of the VCP were asked to provide examples of ways in which the VCP andadvocacy activities have made a difference - personally, to students, to colleagues, to theirdepartment, or to the profession. The results reflect the perceptions of the members of aCommunity of Practice after one and a half years of development and will provide an indicationof the strength of the foundation of a sustainable community of practice capable of achievingindividual and community goals.The survey was sent to 20 active members of
”identity, with one of the most cited frameworks being that of Carlone and Johnson [12], whichposits that one’s science identity consists of the interrelationship among performance,competence, and recognition. Building on this framework and drawing from a social-cognitiveperspective, Hazari and colleagues [11] added a fourth component when they examined students’physics identity, namely interest, which reflects one’s desire or curiosity in a subject [11, 13-14].While these components were developed within the context of specific roles (e.g., science,physics), they reflect general aspects of one’s role-related identity, and therefore they areapplicable to specific fields beyond science. Drawing from this framework, this paper describesthe
ASEE Paper_2019_Final - Google Docs concerns. As such, the co-instructors framed the seminar as helping the LAs (a) learn how to support their students, (b) learn how to partner with course instructors to improve students’ experiences, and (c) develop their engineering skills (e.g reflect on design process, facilitate teamwork, and consider social justice implications). This second iteration of the seminar maintained some of the same learning objectives as the pilot version of the seminar such as (1) identify and critically evaluate claims from readings, (2) carefully observe and document classroom events, (3) analyze classroom events and consider multiple plausible
between engineering faculty expertise and the requirements of preparing students to function well in diverse settings and promote inclusive practices. Possible Topics for Future Papers/Collaborations • Given that engaged reflection is essential for students to optimize their learning from intercultural interactions and other diversity interventions, what are the most effective pedagogical strategies for getting students to engage in meaningful reflection? How can we structure reflection assignments so that they are optimally timed, efficient, and focused while still allowing space for
(e.g., Critical Reflective Writing; Teaching and Learningin Undergraduate Science and Engineering, etc.) All of these activities share a common goal of creat-ing curricular and pedagogical structures as well as academic cultures that facilitate students’ interests,motivation, and desire to persist in engineering. Through this work, outreach, and involvement in the com-munity, Dr. Zastavker continues to focus on the issues of women and minorities in science/engineering. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Work in Progress: Transformation through Liberal Arts-Focused Grand Challenges Scholars ProgramsAbstractThe National Academy of Engineering’s Grand Challenges Scholars Program
identifies perceived benefits and challenges for the students engaged in thecompetition. Complementing the report of the team's experience at the 2018 RTZ, this studyemphasizes the importance of teamwork collaboration in the present context of the AEC industrywhile drawing upon concepts of sustainable construction. The study encompasses data collectedfrom: (1) a survey with all the 8 students, (2) interviews with the faculty leader and the studentteam leader, and (3) the reflections of two of the authors of this paper based on their ownexperiences and observations as participants in the 2018 RTZ competition team. Three categoriesemerged from the data and background literature analyzed: teamwork, education and knowledge,skills, and abilities (KSA
theirjobs, and 3) reflection on the tools through journaling. Student evaluations and feedback havedemonstrated the power of these tools for significant improvements and even transformation inorganizational behavior. Future work is needed to potentially isolate effects of such skilldevelopment for engineers as compared with other populations, and to gather data on the relativebenefits of this approach as compared with others. Given the extensive systems skills that engineers have, such systems thinking tools canprovide a powerful way for them to exercise leadership through improvement and optimizationof organizational behavior. Such an approach can complement and augment the prevalentinitiatives for communication, social, and business skill
chilled the classroom?• Celebrate every moment spent on critical self-reflection about teaching The ETW places a premium on reflective self-assessment. The assessment of the third participant class relies heavily on self-assessment, with the intent that workshop participants will continue to develop these skills at their home institutions.There are several items on the list that are not currently in the ETW but could andprobably should be incorporated:• Build coalitions with educators who are different from me in terms of race, sexual orientation, gender, religion, home language, class, (dis)ability, and other identities The suggestion of building a coalition is a great one and it could easily be incorporated into the