, such as a sophomore-levelproject-based course that provides the foundation for successful teamwork, professional ethics,design processes, and professional formation as a civil engineer. Project materials for this courseare provided by industry partners (e.g., data, plans, construction estimates, stakeholder input andfeedback), which are being developed into project case studies that can be integrated horizontallyand vertically into coursework to showcase how a component analysis fits within a largersystem. (See related paper being presented at this conference [1].) Cultural transformationincludes flexible departmental structures, for example replacing the current structure oforganizing faculty around sub-disciplines and instead organizing
of studentdesign reports indicate that design achievement and ability to communicate design improve asstudents complete additional projects. By implementing and assessing hands-on engineeringdesign project assignments at the sophomore and junior levels, we have improved student designknowledge, confidence, and achievement prior to capstone design.IntroductionAn undergraduate biomedical engineering (BME) curriculum should prepare students toapproach complex problems confidently. To achieve this, BME programs can offer curricula thathelp students develop into technically adept engineers, effective communicators, and skilleddesigners that account for social, economic, and ethical responsibilities. Modern health-relatedchallenges also require
Paper ID #28692Building Toys for Children by Applying Entrepreneurial-Minded Learningand Universal Design PrinciplesDr. Scott Streiner, Rowan University Dr. Scott Streiner is an assistant professor in the Experiential Engineering Education Department (ExEEd) at Rowan University. He received his Ph.D in Industrial Engineering from the University of Pittsburgh, with a focus in engineering education. His research interests include engineering global competency, cur- ricula and assessment; pedagogical innovations through game-based and playful learning; spatial skills development and engineering ethics education. His funded
them in simulation provides hapticfeedback to students.The overarching goal in this work is to cause students to 1.) expand upon the concepts learnedearlier in the course, 2.) explore new applications and limitations of the technologies introduced,3.) work in small groups to design and test an experiment, and 4.) collaborate and ethically sharemeasurement outcomes.MethodsEach of the earlier laboratories in the Microelectronic Devices & Circuits course, in which thisnon-idealities lab occurs, concludes with its own short experimental exploration. Theseexplorations ask students to use the technology they have just been exposed to in lab and apply itin a practical way. Such practical applications include LED lighting, signal rectification, a
related to self-understanding (personal strengths [8], values, ethics and social identity).Students completed eight reflection assignments, based on the lecture and discussion topics.Prior to Fall 2018, course evaluations for ENGR 110 consistently indicated that some studentsdesired more exposure to careers within the engineering field, while other students needed moresupport leveraging academic resources and integrating into the engineering communitysuccessfully. Many students indicated that their primary motivation for enrolling in the coursewas to determine which major to pursue and had limited interest in other topics provided by thecourse. In an effort to improve student engagement and motivation across a range of needs, weintroduced student
Body of Knowledge is a valuable resource for junior engineers to recognize the skillsand training necessary to enter the civil engineering profession, yet the resource has notnecessarily been adopted among civil engineering faculty in a deliberate way. The authors of theBOK specifically identify the senior design course as the likely opportunity for students toacquire knowledge in specific professional categories supporting full development intocompetent civil engineers. The BOK’s language identifies the course as one component of the“typical pathway for fulfillment” for the Social Sciences, Critical Thinking and Problem Solving,Teamwork and Leadership, Professional Responsibilities, and Ethical Responsibilities. Withthese (5) outcomes
of encouraging peermentoring [22]. To facilitate teamwork, students completed and submitted their Meyers-Briggstype including weight of each category with follow up discussions on how differences inpersonalities could make for positive or negative collaboration experience. Other activities tofacilitate teamwork included a Code of Ethics co-written by teams, a signed list of participationfor each member at each gate, and a teammate review for all team members at the end of thesemester. The final review contributed to 5% of student final grade.Instrument and procedure The instruments were iteratively developed since 2016 fall semester, with the overall goalof receiving feedback from students to further improve the learning experience
-residence at Nokia Bell Labs and an assistant professor at the University of Michigan teaching Sci-Fi Prototyping, a course combining sci-fi, prototyping, and ethics. Her ongoing objective is to combine her background in art, design, and engineering to inspire a more positive future. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020Considering people: An exploratory investigation of engineering student ideationLaura R. MurphyShanna R. DalyColleen M. SeifertEytan AdarSophia BruecknerUniversity of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USAAbstractHuman-centered design is a prominent approach to engineering design. However, research hasdocumented multiple engineering student challenges in considering the people who will use
, “Service learning: A positive approach to teaching engineering ethics and social impact of technology,” age, vol. 5, p. 2, 2000.[15] E. Tsang, C. D. Martin, and R. Decker, “Service Learning as a Strategy for Engineering Education for the 21 st Century,” in 1997 Annual Conference, 1997, pp. 2–355.[16] L. J. Bottomley and E. A. Parry, “Assessment of an engineering outreach program: Hands on engineering,” Proc. American Society for Engineering Education, ASEE 2002, 2002.[17] D. E. Giles Jr and J. Eyler, “The impact of a college community service laboratory on students’ personal, social, and cognitive outcomes,” Journal of adolescence, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 327–339, 1994.[18] A. R. Bielefeldt and N. Canney, “Impacts of service
instance, Table 4shows all the concepts that were found to be associated with the thematic branch labeled aspersonal attributes.Table 4. Concepts contained within the Personal Attributes Thematic Branch Personal Attributes Attitudes Behaviors Character/Personal Traits Adventure outlook action charisma Curiosity/how things work (inquisitiveness/interest) cognitive adaptability courage experience assess identity lesson learned dream ethics positive
courses that everystudent in the major is expected to take. As a result, these nodes are larger in the visualizationbecause more students take them. Because these courses represent the foundational aspects of thecurriculum, core courses are often spread across the curriculum and are very carefully sequencedthrough the use of prerequisites. This expectation is confirmed in Figure 7.What was surprising about this constellation is that one of the core courses was taken very late inthe curriculum (circled in red). By hovering on this node, we saw that the course is about theimpact computers have on society. A topics course about ethics and trends in computing, studentsmay take this course later in the curriculum to offset some of their more time
graduate students and two university professional developers),determined the audience and focus for the workshop. We felt the discrepancies between STEM-H discipline research and education research (e.g. natural laws vs. conceptual frameworks,feasibility and ethicality of controlled studies in education), would be the main source of initialconfusion for participants. We hypothesized that the participants would benefit from anintroduction to foundational education research ideas, and we addressed these discrepancies thatlead to tensions due to differing views and values of research among the discipline-basedcommunities. We sought to unpack and diffuse tensions by emphasizing that anywhere on thelandscape, valuable research means appropriately
Paper ID #28515Developing and Sustaining a Research Group: A Novel Approach toOnboarding Doctoral StudentsDr. Madeline Polmear, University of Florida Madeline Polmear is a postdoctoral researcher in the Department of Civil and Coastal Engineering at the University of Florida. Her research interests include workforce development and engineering ethics education.Dr. Denise Rutledge Simmons P.E., University of Florida Denise R. Simmons, Ph.D., PE, LEED-AP, is an associate professor in the Department of Civil and Coastal Engineering in the Herbert Wertheim College of Engineering at the University of Florida. She holds a
and effectiveness of inclusion and diversity initiatives and employing innovative, ethical and inclusive mixed methods research designs to People Research.Dr. Michelle Soledad, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Michelle Soledad is the Director of Communications and International Engagement in the Department of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. She holds degrees degrees in Electrical Engineering (BS, ME) from the Ateneo de Davao University (ADDU) in Davao City, Philippines, and in Engineering Education (PhD) from Virginia Tech. Her research interests include faculty development and data-informed reflec- tive practice. Michelle’s professional experience includes roles in industry and academia
, Conference Proceedings, 2017.[6] E. Schmitt, E. Kames, B. Morkos, and T. A. Conway, “The importance of incorporating designer empathy in senior capstone design courses,” in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, 2016.[7] J. L. Hess, J. Strobel, and A. O. Brightman, “The Development of Empathic Perspective- Taking in an Engineering Ethics Course,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 106, no. 4, pp. 534–563, 2017.[8] E. Segal, K. Gerdes, C. Lietz, M. A. Wagaman, and J. Geiger, Assessing Empathy. 2017.[9] M. Kouprie and F. S. Visser, “A framework for empathy in design: stepping into and out of the user’s life,” J. Eng. Des., vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 437–448, 2009.[10] J. Walther, S. E. Miller, and N. W. Sochacka, “A
, manyengineering experiments are costly and complicated, restricting their use to instructionallaboratories. Another common occurrence is that engineering lab classes often encompass a widevariety of learning objectives [9]. For the purposes of ABET evaluation and assessment, it is notuncommon for lab classes to be used to assess student outcomes beyond experimentation, andincluding student outcomes having to do with communication, teamwork, ethics andprofessionalism, and life-long learning. Communication, in particular, is a component in labclasses that often results in the majority of time being spent on the preparation of written reportsrather than on actually doing the experiment or in reflecting on the results [10]. As a result,students in dedicated
ethically, intellectually, andprofessionally prepared to serve their country and humanity. It offers Bachelor of Sciencedegrees in nine majors including civil engineering and all cadets must graduate in four years.Approximately 12% of the Class of 2020 are Civil Engineers (typically 10 – 15% for any givenyear). The civil engineering curriculum is broad and provides a solid background in thestructures, environmental, geotechnical, and construction sub-fields of civil engineering.Graduates pursue a number of different career paths and many of them serve in the United StatesCoast Guard (USCG) as practicing civil engineers, pursue professional licensure, and attendgraduate programs in civil engineering. Emphasis is placed on balancing theory and
common courses during their first year of study. These common first-yearcourses become also beneficial as they are typically required for field-specific ABET degree accreditations(ABET, 2018), thus allowing across different engineering and technology fields to use a standard first-yearcurricula.To orient students into college during their first-year of study (Ward-Roof, 2010), common first-year programsin many engineering and science programs are designed for students take introductory mathematics, science,English, and other general STEM courses, typically covering topics such as coding, data representation,engineering design, problem-based solving, teamwork, ethics, and effective communications. In addition, thecommon-first year programs may
support continuing someoutreach methods, streamlining workflows to exclusively use interlibrary loan as a request andfulfillment system, and the need to periodically train interlibrary loan staff. We also recommendthat discoverability of standards in our collection should be improved through catalogingimprovements and creation of finding aids for different audiences.IntroductionWhen designing something for human use, there is often a free-wheeling, creative phase that isunbounded by reality. However, at some point in the implementation of the design, constraintsbecome a part of the creator(s) process, whether it be the laws of physics, available materials, oran agreed-upon convention, ethical limit, or rule. Standards documents represent one form
-133, 2009. [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/29734077.[6] B. M. Capobianco, "Undergraduate women engineering their professional identities" vol. 12, no. 2-3, pp. 95-117, 2006-08-30 2006, doi: 10.1615/JWomenMinorScienEng.v12.i2- 3.10.[7] K. L. Meyers, M. Ohland, A. Pawley, S. Stephen, and K. Smith, Factors relating to engineering identity. 2012.[8] M. C. Loui, "Ethics and the Development of Professional Identities of Engineering Students," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 94, no. 4, pp. 383-390, 2005, doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2005.tb00866.x.[9] A. Rodriguez and M. P, Factors related to advanced course-taking patterns, persistence in science technology engineering and
education academy to evolve toinclude competency mastery” in engineering education programming in areas of continuouspersistence, ethical decision making and problem-solving [2]. A need exists for graduates inapplied sciences like engineering and technology education to acquire non-technical,transdisciplinary competencies like resilience. Problem solving, encountering and learning fromerror and engaging with team members with mature levels of emotional intelligence all requirepersistence [1], [2].Hernandez et al. in 2018 include resilience among top mental attitude and contextual responsesnecessary for retaining engineering students. Resilience competency attributes are practiced andtransferred into the engineering environment where one faces
Engineering andDesign (ENGR 104) course is a project based class that introduces students to the engineering design processand explores the role of creativity in design, team dynamics, 3D visualization, diversity of perspective, globalimpact of design, and ethics. All engineering and design students are required to take ENGR 104 as pre-majors, prior to applying to major. The majority of students take the course during their first year at WWU.The course is taught by a variety of instructors and has a class capacity of 50 students.The three interventions embedded into the course were 1) a collaborative activity establishing classroomnorms, 2) a mid-quarter activity engaging students with the concept of growth mindset, and 3) instructorconnection
keepindividuals from work they want to pursue.Across the engineering field, diversity has been linked to enhanced innovativeness, intellectualengagement, and innovation [1]. Because of the benefits to the field, some view it as imperativethat we more intentionally include students with disabilities within the civil engineering contextbecause they can provide nuanced and important insights to advance the accessibility ofinfrastructure and the field of civil engineering design. While we agree that diversity itself can beadvantageous, however, we believe it is equally, if not more, imperative to address inclusionfrom the perspective of justice and equity. That is, we believe that as a field, engineeringeducation is morally and ethically responsible for
engineeringcommunication classroom. For example, we have two student teams work together on theirprojects so they can learn more about technology, on the one hand, and writing, on the other. Inthis way, we likewise encourage these students to continue to keep learning over their 30-year-long professional career.3.0 Lifelong Learning Background The goals of the information literacy components of the communication course aresimilar to those of Feldmann and Feldmann’s [6] assignment for their class, which are thefollowing: to make students aware of the rich store of information available; to help the studentslearn the basic skills needed to locate their needed information; to encourage team-basedinteraction on their project; to understand the ethics of
Engineering Education Research (pp. 103-118). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press[6] Davis, M. (2012) A Plea for Judgment. Science Engineering Ethics, 18(4), 789-808.[7] Gorman, M. (2002) Turning Students into Professionals: Types of Knowledge and ABET Engineering Criteria. Journal of Engineering Education, 91(3), 327-332.[8] Bissell, C., & Dillon, C. (2000). Telling tales: models, stories and meanings. For the Learning of Mathematics, 20(3), 3-11.[9] Edwards, D. & Hamson, M. (1990) Guide to Mathematical Modelling. School of Mathematics and Computing. Thames polytechnic, London SE18GPF.[10] McNeill, N.J., Douglas, E.P., Koro-Ljungberg, M., Therriault, D.J., & Krause, I. (2016). Undergraduate Students’ Beliefs
large number of plagiarism cases, thereare fewer easy to use or well understood tools and interventions available to instructors of thesecourses. This paper describes a sequence of plagiarism cases in a large first-year computerprogramming course for engineers, and how the course was adapted in order to address theprevalence of these cases. Part of the issue with plagiarism in computer programming is a lack of consensus on what isand is not ethical to copy and use without acknowledgement when it comes to computer code.Many programmers gladly share code openly, and being able to find examples of code that canhelp you write a program can be a valuable and valid skill for a programmer. However, whencourses are tasked with teaching and assessing
, or project management. Within ABET, there are other non-technicalabilities identified that must be developed within an engineering program such ascommunication, ethics, and teamwork. Also within ABET, there are desirable attributesdescribed such as “consideration of public health, safety, and welfare.”17WAYS OF APPROACHING PROBLEMSSolving problems is central to engineering. The first two ABET student outcomes make thisexplicit: “(1) an ability to identify, formulate, and solve complex engineering problems byapplying principles of engineering, science, and mathematics, [and] (2) an ability to applyengineering design to produce solutions that meet specified needs with consideration of publichealth, safety, and welfare, as well as global
mechanical engineering through team- oriented projects. Table 3. Programs implemented by AmbassadorsIn addition to providing an overview of their projects and who the intended populations are, theAmbassadors provided further details on their plans, purpose and passion surrounding theirideas. The first ambassador showed excitement around being able to empower other girls andbuild their confidence: “I would like to spread my passion for STEAM and my passion for empowering girls so they can learn to believe that all they need is knowledge, confidence, strong work ethics and determination to achieve anything they want in any field they want. I will
were becoming more collaborative.Although it is not advisable that the students abandon their other learned conflict managementstyles as each style has their distinct benefits, it is important to note that their apparent short-comings in collaborative conflict management is an impediment to their continued success.References1. AIA National, AIA California Council (2007). Integrated Project Delivery: A Guide. AIA, AIA CC.2. Aristotle (340 BC). Nicomachean Ethics bk. 2, 1103a.3. Bowman, S. (2007). The Secret to Adult Learning: It’s NOT About Age! Bowperson Publishing and Training, Inc. Retrieved from: http://bowperson.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/AdultLearningArticle.pdf4. Bray, H.G. & Manry D.W. (2007). Active Learning in a